Next Article in Journal
A Replication-Defective Myxoma Virus Inducing Pro-Inflammatory Responses as Monotherapy and an Adjuvant to Chemo- and DC Immuno-Therapy for Ovarian Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
HSV-1 Infection in Retinal Pigment Epithelial Cells: A Possible Contribution to Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Previous Article in Special Issue
Heterologous Immunization with Improved HIV-1 Subtype C Vaccines Elicit Autologous Tier 2 Neutralizing Antibodies with Rapid Viral Replication Control After SHIV Challenge
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

The Evolution of Cell Culture Systems to Study Hepatitis B Virus Pathogenesis and Antiviral Susceptibility

1
Discipline of Virology, University of KwaZulu-Natal, School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Sciences and National Health Laboratory Service, Durban 4013, South Africa
2
Discipline of Medical Biochemistry and Chemical Pathology, School of Laboratory Medicine and Medical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Howard College Campus, Durban 4013, South Africa
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Viruses 2025, 17(8), 1057; https://doi.org/10.3390/v17081057
Submission received: 25 April 2025 / Revised: 22 July 2025 / Accepted: 24 July 2025 / Published: 29 July 2025

Abstract

The global burden of hepatitis B virus (HBV) remains high, with ongoing concerted efforts to eliminate viral hepatitis as a public health concern by 2030. The absence of curative treatment against HBV makes it an active area of research to further study HBV pathogenesis. In vitro cell culture systems are essential in exploration of molecular mechanisms for HBV propagation and the development of therapeutic targets for antiviral agents. The lack of an efficient cell culture system is one of the challenges limiting the development and study of novel antiviral strategies for HBV infection. However, the evolution of cell culture systems to study HBV pathogenesis and treatment susceptibility in vitro has made a significant contribution to public health. The currently available cell culture systems to grow HBV have their advantages and limitations, requiring further optimization. The discovery of sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (NTCP) as a receptor for HBV was a major breakthrough for the development of a robust cell model, allowing the study of de novo HBV infection through NTCP expression in the HepG2 hepatoma cell line. This review is aimed at highlighting the evolution of cell culture systems to study HBV pathogenesis and in vitro treatment susceptibility.

1. Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO), in its 2024 report, estimated that 254 million people live with chronic HBV infection globally [1]. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) also reported that over 6 million children under the age of 5 years live with chronic HBV infection [2]. Moreover, the CDC estimated that HBV contributes to 820,000 deaths annually [2]. According to a WHO report, approximately 1.1 million HBV-related deaths occurred in 2022 [1], with over 60 million sub-Saharan Africans living with chronic HBV, of which 2.7 million are from South Africa in 2022 [1,3].
The availability of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and the HBV vaccine has tremendously changed the incidence of HBV [4,5]. Nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs), such as tenofovir (TDF and TAF), lamivudine (3TC), and emtricitabine (FTC), are used to suppress HBV replication and are often combined in regimens for HIV/HBV co-infected patients. Entecavir is an alternative treatment when tenofovir is contraindicated [6]. Guidelines from the WHO, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), and Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) recommend first-line treatment with TDF, TAF, or entecavir to prevent liver disease progression and complications, such as cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [1,7,8,9,10,11]. Treatment initiation is generally recommended for patients with active liver disease, significant fibrosis, or cirrhosis, and for specific populations, such as pregnant women and those co-infected with HCV, HIV, or HDV [7,9,12,13,14]. Despite effective viral suppression, long-term therapy is challenged by drug toxicity, resistance, and metabolic side effects [15].
The WHO has set an ambitious target to eliminate viral hepatitis by 2030; however, progress is limited by the lack of robust in vitro models for HBV research [16,17,18]. The discovery of sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (NTCP) as an HBV receptor enabled the development of the HepG2-NTCP cell line, which supports de novo HBV infection and facilitates studies on viral pathogenesis, antiviral screening, and drug toxicity [19,20,21,22]. This review examines the progress in developing cell culture systems to study HBV and highlights the HepG2-NTCP cell culture system as an emerging and promising approach. The HepG2-NTCP model shows promise for advancing research on the complete HBV life cycle, existing therapeutic strategies, and their mechanisms of action, potentially leading to a deeper understanding of HBV infection and more effective treatment.

2. HBV Biological Organization

HBV, a virus of the Hepadnaviridae family, primarily infects humans and can also infect chimpanzees, chacma baboons, and tree shrews [23,24]. It has up to ten genotypes and a partially double-stranded relaxed circular deoxyribonucleic acid (rcDNA) genome [23]. The virus exists in three forms: infectious Dane particles and non-infectious spherical and filamentous particles [23,24].

2.1. Organization and Structure of the Genome

The Dane particle of HBV is 30–42 nm in diameter (Figure 1) [24]. The HBV genome has four overlapping open reading frames (ORFs): S (surface proteins), C (core proteins), P (polymerase), and X (HBx protein). The multifunctional viral protein known as HBV X protein (HBx) controls a number of signaling pathways, activates transcription, advances the cell cycle, and is involved in deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) repair and the breakdown of proteins [15]. The P ORF encodes a polymerase with reverse transcriptase and RNase H activity, which is required for viral replication [25,26]. HBV has a durable viral genome embedded in episomes and covalently closed circular deoxyribonucleic acid (cccDNA), which plays a significant role in the nuclei of infected hepatocytes. Understanding the biological organization of HBV and therapeutic drug targets is crucial for developing a cure. The inner nucleocapsid is icosahedral and contains the core antigen (HBcAg) enclosed by lipid-implanted surface proteins (HBsAg) [27] (Figure 1). Pre-S1 and pre-S2 are crucial parts of the virion protein envelope, involved in assembly, infection, replication, and host immune feedback [28,29,30]. Mutations in the pre-S gene can result in immunological evasion, liver dysfunction [31], and suppression of M protein expression [32]. HBV core gene expression produces two distinct homodimer proteins with distinct physiological properties: the core antigen (HBcAg) and the e antigen (HBeAg) [33]. The secreted form of HBcAg in the bloodstream is HBeAg, a marker of active viral replication of HBV [34,35,36].
Significant biomarkers of HBV include blood HBV DNA, anti-HBe antibody, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg), and hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg) [37,38]. Infections caused by the virus are categorized as HBeAg-positive or HBeAg-negative based on the secreted form of HBcAg, HBeAg. Patients with HBeAg-positive infections have higher viral levels and robust disease progression [39]. In accordance with recommendations from major hepatology societies, key biomarkers such as HBeAg, HBsAg quantification, HBV DNA levels, and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels are used to guide therapy decisions [9]. Despite the availability of a safe and effective vaccine, no known treatment plan consistently eliminates chronic HBV.

2.2. The Viral Transmission of HBV and Replication Cycle

HBV is transmitted through infected bodily fluids [37], with the main route being during the perinatal period and early childhood [38,39]. Pregnant women can vertically transmit the virus to their offspring, leading to high levels of viremia and HBeAg positivity [38,39]. HBV replicates in hepatocytes [40], where HBsAg, particularly through the pre-S1 region, is crucial for viral interaction [41,42]. The virus enters hepatocytes via NTCP, a transporter [20], and nucleocapsid complexes are released from endocytic vesicles, generating transcription templates in the nucleus [43,44,45].

2.3. HBV Replication and the Contribution of Cell Division to HBV Resolution

The formation of cccDNA is a crucial step in the HBV life cycle, allowing the virus to establish a persistent infection in hepatocytes. After entering the nucleus, the capsid breaks down, releasing partially double-stranded relaxed circular DNA (rcDNA) [46]. This process involves DNA repair machinery and cellular enzymes, such as DNA polymerase κ and tyrosyl-DNA-phosphodiesterase 2 (TDP2) [47]. HBV replication within infected cells relies on cccDNA, which serves as a template for the transcription of pregenomic RNA (pgRNA) [48,49,50]. HBV polymerase interacts with host factors, such as heat shock protein 90, facilitating viral replication and allowing the terminal protein to engage with epsilon (ε) RNA [51,52,53].
Cell division is crucial in determining the fate of cccDNA and the resolution of HBV infection [54]. Hepatocyte proliferation contributes to the reduction of cccDNA, which may be lost or unevenly distributed during mitosis (Figure 2A) [55,56]. Targeting HBV-infected cells and stimulating cell division may offer a potential therapeutic avenue. Some studies have developed a HepG2-NTCP cell culture system for efficient HBV production and spread; however, questions remain. A study by Michailidis, Pabon [57] found that enhanced HBV infection in HepG2-NTCP cells is NTCP-dependent (Figure 2B) [57].

3. Cell Culture Systems to Study HBV Pathogenesis

HBV cell culture systems generally lack the ability to propagate HBV [48]. Earlier studies described a method of generating full-length HBV genomes cable of being circularized in a manner similar to that of cccDNA, allowing for HBV replication when transfected into the Huh7 cell line [59]. These greater-than-genome-length HBV DNA constructs facilitate the production of viral RNA and their subsequent proteins in culture. Two well-defined human hepatoma cell lines, HepG2 and Huh7, support viral replication following transfection with an appropriate vector [48,60,61]. These transiently transfected cell lines offer a robust system useful in HBV replication and inhibition analysis, as seen with the extensive use of HepG22.2.15 in antiviral research [60].

3.1. Primary Human Hepatocytes

Primary human hepatocytes (PHHs) are used to assess hepatic metabolism, drug interactions, and toxicity in vitro [62,63]. They support the HBV life cycle (Figure 3), maintain liver function, and express host-specific factors [64,65,66,67]. However, their use is limited by factors such as limited donor availability [68], loss of differentiation [62], culture conditions influencing the longevity of cell lines, variability in infection susceptibility [69], and rapid dedifferentiation [62].
Recent advances in HBV research have included a combination of animal models (in vivo) and cell culture-based models using mouse models grafted with partially humanized livers to improve the efficiency of studying HBV replication. These in vivo and in vitro models for HBV research have been reviewed elsewhere [70].
PHHs are the preferred model for liver disease research because of their resemblance to the in vivo hepatic environment. High-activity PHHs have been harvested from liver tissue obtained during surgeries, offering improved selection methods for tissue sources and infection systems [71]. Cryopreservation techniques have also advanced, allowing PHHs to retain their characteristics for weeks after thawing [72]. Novel models using hepatocytes isolated from humanized mouse livers have shown high infection rates, supporting the complete HBV life cycle [73]. However, PHHs cannot be sub cultured, and their long-term viability and sensitivity to HBV are limited. New methods, such as 2D and 3D cultures, are helping to overcome these challenges [74]. Spheroid culture methods, such as bioreactors or ultra-low attachment surfaces, are suitable for long-term studies of drug metabolism and virus–host interactions [75,76].

3.2. Human Fetal Hepatocytes

Human fetal hepatocytes, which resemble adult hepatocytes, are an attractive research system because of their functional capabilities and ability to produce vital markers (Table 1) [77]. They support HBV replication, producing viral proteins, RNA, DNA, and infectious particles [77]. However, their infection efficiency is low, and they lose sensitivity to further attacks [77]. Researchers have developed serum-free cultures that maintain hepatocyte characteristics for up to four months and co-cultured hepatocytes with nonparenchymal cells to extend liver function and HBV susceptibility for longer periods [78].

3.3. Huh7

The Huh7 cell line (Figure 3), derived from hepatocellular carcinoma, is used as an experimental substitute for primary hepatocytes [101]. However, Huh7 cells do not fully replicate the normal hepatocyte characteristics due to poor polarization [102]. Researchers have identified NTCP as a functional receptor for HBV and have overexpressed it in Huh7 cells to support HBV infection [67]. DMSO treatment is unnecessary for Huh7.5-NTCP cells [103], as it induces cell growth arrest [104], alters protein expression, and causes cytotoxicity [105]. Unfortunately, Huh7 cells lack support for viral uncoating and replication processes [19].

3.4. HepG2.2.15 Cells

The HepG2.2.15 cell line, developed by Sells et al., is a valuable system for studying HBV replication, gene expression, and antiviral drug screening (Figure 3) [60]. It was created by co-transfecting HepG2 human hepatoma cells with the recombinant vector pDoLTHBV-1, which contains two head-to-tail dimers of HBV DNA and a plasmid encoding the neomycin resistance gene [60]. The cell line can generate various HBV-specific mRNAs and produce Dane particles, which are infectious HBV virions [79]. However, it lacks the NTCP receptor, which is essential for HBV entry, making it resistant to infection. The absence of immune system components also prevents the study of host immune responses to HBV [79].

3.5. Vector-Based Systems

Vector-based systems play a significant role in advancing our understanding of viral replication, gene delivery, and the development of therapeutic strategies in HBV research (Figure 3). In these systems, viruses such as adenoviruses (AdVs) and adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) deliver HBV DNA to cells, particularly hepatocytes [106,107,108]. There are different types of vector-based systems, including AdVs, AAVs, recombinant HBV vectors (rHBVs), and other viral vectors, each offering distinct advantages for HBV research. AdVs are commonly used vectors to model HBV replication by delivering greater-than-genome-length HBV DNA to hepatocytes, which facilitates efficient translation, replication, and production of the virus [108,109]. AdV and rHBV systems enable control studies of HBV replication both in vitro and in vivo to assist in understanding the HBV life cycle. Additionally, HBV can be inhibited using genes delivered by AAV or rHBV vectors, which target viral proteins or stimulate the host’s immune response to clear the virus [110,111]. HBV vaccine candidates that express viral antigens and stimulate robust immune responses have been developed using AdVs, as they mimic acute infections and can be used to test vaccine effectiveness. New antiviral drugs can be tested in a controlled environment using vector systems based on HBV, such as rHBV [112]. T-cell and B-cell responses to HBV can be studied using AdV-HBV systems to mimic acute infection [113].

3.6. HepAD38 (EF9 and EFS19) Cells

Researchers have developed several HepG2-derived cell lines to study HBV replication and screen for potential antiviral drugs. The HepAD38 cell line, engineered by Ladner et al., contains 1.1 copies of the HBV genome and is controlled by an inducible promoter (Table 1) [79,114]. It produces significantly higher levels of HBV DNA than HepG2.2.15 cells because of a disrupted precore gene [79]. HepAD38 cells use HBeAg as a surrogate marker to estimate cccDNA levels, making them suitable for studying virus–host interactions during the early stages of HBV infection. New cell lines, HepDE19 and HepDES19, have been developed to enhance the study of HBV replication, such as the HepBHAe82 cell line for cccDNA detection and the Hep38.7-Tet cell line for higher levels of HBV replication and cccDNA [115,116].

3.7. Ad-HBV 1.3 System

The Ad-HBV1.3-HepG2 system, developed by He et al., is a novel method for studying HBV replication [106]. The system uses an adenoviral vector to deliver a 1.3-fold overlength HBV genome into a 293-packaging cell line and infects HepG2 cells with the recombinant virus, Ad-HBV1.3 [106]. This allows researchers to study how cells from different species can support HBV replication and the role of specific viral proteins in regulating the viral life cycle [106]. However, this system is associated with significant cytotoxicity, which may limit its use in certain research applications.

3.8. HepaRG Cells

The HepaRG cell line, derived from a liver tumor caused by the hepatitis C virus, is a valuable model for studying hepatic function (Figure 3) [117]. It expresses nuclear receptors and essential liver enzymes, making it more comparable to primary human hepatocytes (PHHs) [95]. HepaRG cells produce infectious HBV particles for over 100 days in a differentiated state [118]; however, HBV infection is limited. Viral replication in HepaRG cells is slow, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) is commonly used to promote differentiation [117,118]. Forskolin, an alternative to DMSO, enhances differentiation by boosting hepatic marker expression [119]. A five-chemical cocktail (5C-medium) has been employed to accelerate differentiation and maintain differentiated characteristics of iPSCs [120]. Despite the limitations of HBV infection studies, HepaRG cells are widely used in antiviral drug metabolism research because of their ability to express various CYP450 enzymes and study the entire HBV life cycle [94].

3.9. The 3D Culture

In vitro culturing and maintenance of hepatocytes present challenges due to their rapid loss of cuboidal morphology and liver-specific functions [121,122]. To address these issues, researchers have developed three-dimensional (3D) culture systems to promote spheroid morphology in PHHs (Figure 3) [123]. One method involves placing PHHs on a single-layer collagen matrix; however, this results in a decline in basic liver functions [124]. A novel 3D cell culture method involves the fabrication of PHH microtissues through droplet microfluidics and encapsulation of PHHs with fibroblasts [125]. This method has demonstrated sustained expression of hepatocyte genes and maintenance of functional liver-specific genes for one month or longer [126,127]. However, the quest for a robust in vitro culture system for HBV infections remains essential for studying the virus’s life cycle and developing new therapeutic strategies.

3.10. HBV Baculovirus System

Delaney et al. created a recombinant baculovirus/HepG2 system that enabled the expression of HBV antigens and detection of high levels of viral products (Table 1) [128,129]. The system can sustain HBV replication at elevated levels for at least 35 days, showing dose-dependent expression levels and viral infection [130]. It can quantify the impact of antiviral agents on nuclear HBV DNA and investigate the virus’s resistance to nucleoside analogues [128,129]. However, it has some limitations. A significant drawback is that traditional baculovirus vectors are not suitable for animal experiments because they are quickly inactivated by the complement system [131,132].

3.11. Co-Culture System

Primary human hepatocyte (PHH) cultures are useful for studying HBV infection in vitro; however, they often undergo rapid dedifferentiation, making viral infections abortive (Table 1) [87]. Zhou and colleagues developed a co-culture system that maintains hepatocyte differentiation for up to three months, preserving liver functions like bile canalicular structures [85]. Winer et al. developed a stromal cell-assisted co-culture (SACC) system that promotes advanced liver morphology and extends the functional lifespan of hepatocytes [133,134]. This system supports reproducible HBV infections and is suitable for high-throughput screening applications, allowing for the evaluation of direct-acting antivirals, host-targeting antivirals, and potentially vaccine-induced neutralizing antibodies [135] (Table 1).

3.12. Primary Tupaia Hepatocytes

Tree shrews, which are small mammals, are known to be susceptible to HBV infection. Primary hepatocytes from tree shrews support HBV infection, with detectable viral markers and key antigens (Table 1) [136]. The early stages of HBV infection resemble human hepatocytes, but the efficiency is low [90]. Researchers have developed a method using a recombinant adenoviral vector carrying the full HBV genome to overcome the inhibitory effect of human serum. This system allows tree shrew hepatocytes to support the complete replication cycle of HBV, including the formation of cccDNA, secretion of viral proteins, and generation of fully functional virus particles. Tree shrew hepatocytes have been pivotal in identifying NTCP as an HBV receptor [20].
Numerous in vitro cell culture systems have been developed over the past decades to investigate host viral immune responses and HBV life cycle. Nevertheless, little is known about the host response to HBV infection, and there is currently no curative treatment for HBV infections. The absence of reliable methods for culturing HBV-infected cell lines may be due to restricted host and tissue tropism [137]. Some of the drawbacks of in vitro cell culture systems are altered cell morphology, absence of an extracellular matrix, inadequate accessory cells, aberrant expression of liver enzymatic proteins, improper cell-to-cell communication, short duration of viral infection, and lack of hepatic functions after isolation and plating [62]. However, cell culture systems are the best tools for toxicity evaluation in pharmaceutical development [21,22]. Moreover, cell culture systems have contributed a great deal of knowledge and key pathways in the exploration of diseases.

4. In Vitro Systems Based on Induced Pluripotent Stem (iPS)

Cell-Derived Human Hepatocytes

Human primary hepatocytes are limited in availability and tend to lose their metabolic functionality in vitro, making them less suitable for long-term studies. Hepatoma cell lines are easier to cultivate but are not susceptible to HBV infection and lack key cellular pathways. Scientists have sought alternative cell culture systems to study the HBV life cycle and its interactions with host cells [79]. One promising approach is the use of pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), which can differentiate into various cell types and maintain genetic stability [138,139]. Researchers have also developed iPSC-derived hepatocyte lines capable of expressing NTCP, a key receptor involved in HBV entry. These hepatocyte-like cells have been used to model HBV infection and virus-induced liver dysfunction, providing a potential platform for personalized hepatitis therapies [99]. Despite challenges (the complexity of the differentiation process, strict culture requirements, and the need for advanced technical expertise), iPSC-derived systems offer promising tools for HBV research, drug development, and personalized medicine approaches.

5. HepG2-NTCP Cell Culture System for Studying HBV

The HepG2-NTCP cell line includes hepatoma cells engineered to express NTCP, an essential receptor for HBV and Hepatitis D viral entry. The standard HepG2 cells are not optimal for HBV infection due to the lack of the cell receptor NTCP. The HepG2-NTCP cell line has been further engineered into HepG2-NTCP sec+ cells which select for enhanced HBsAg secretion [140,141].

5.1. NTCP, an Effective HBV Entry Receptor

The sodium-taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (NTCP) is encoded by the human SLC10A1 (solute carrier family 10 member 1) gene. The liver bile acid transporter (LBST) is 56 kDa in mass [142]. The HBV entry receptor NTCP was discovered in 2012, and its overexpression supports the establishment of a susceptible cell line for HBV infection. This discovery has made it possible to investigate HBV infection in greater detail and to investigate potential new treatments [20,143].
NTCP is located at the hepatocyte plasma membrane on the cell’s basolateral side, where it is involved in the hepatic influx of conjugated bile salts from the portal blood circulation [142]. Primarily, NTCP binds to a complex containing two Na+ ions and bile acid for uptake; however, it can also attach to other compounds, including a range of xenobiotics, drug-conjugated bile salts, thyroid hormones, and steroid hormones. Numerous NTCP single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been demonstrated to change the transporter’s activity; however, none of these abnormalities have been linked to serious diseases [144,145]. Knockdown studies have shown that the absence of NTCP expression in human liver cells decreases HBV infection, whereas overexpression of NTCP increases susceptibility to HBV infection [100,146,147]. The sequence of the NTCP binding site at amino acids at position 157–165 has high affinity for preS-1 of L-HBsAg, facilitating viral entry [148]. The relationship between NTCP and HBV sheds light on the early stages of viral infection and could provide a new target for antiviral therapy (Figure 4). Prior to the discovery of NTCP, heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG) was thought to be the HBV adsorption mediation cell surface receptor, but this did not decode the direct link between HBV and hepatocytes [149].

5.2. HepG2 Cell Culture

HepG2 cells are human hepatoma cell lines. HepG2 cell lines are commonly employed in drug metabolism and hepatotoxicity research [20,150]. Moreover, HepG2 cells have recently been used in highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) toxicity studies [151,152]. HepG2.2.15 [60] and HepAD38 [114], two HepG2-derived cells, were used to generate cell culture-derived HBV to access the culminating phase of the viral life cycle and conduct antiviral research [80,153]. HepG2 cells’ exogenous NTCP expression facilitated the full HBV life cycle and the spread of the virus [19,57]. It has been demonstrated that HepG2-NTCP cells’ hepatocyte maintenance medium (HMM), which is produced from commercial human inducible pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), increases HBV infection and NTCP expression [154]. HepG2-NTCP culture systems are deemed a near-perfect surrogate model for HBV studies because of their characteristics, such as good repeatability of experimental outcomes and efficient viral infection [155,156].

5.3. HepG2-NTCP Cell Culture

The HepG2-NTCP cell culture method offers a valuable tool for understanding different stages of HBV infection. There is even evidence suggesting that HepG2-NTCP cells are more susceptible to HBV infection then Huh7 cells expressing NTCP [19]. However, its limitations include the absence of miRNA-122 [157] and increased usage of DMSO and polyethylene glycol (PEG) [158,159,160], which are essential for sustaining viral infection in culture. König, Yang [161] demonstrated that HepG2-NTCP sec+ cells are capable of supporting the full life cycle of HBV and the long-term spread of the virus [161]. In contrast, HepG2-NTCP sec+ cells have a short-distance route for HBV to spread to nearby cells, resulting in HBV-infected cell clusters and necessitating the use of PEG and high viral titer inoculum (up to 5000 GEq/mL) to enhance infectivity. Zahoor, Kuipery [141] presented an improved in vitro infection system using the HepG2-NTCP-A3/C2 subclone in the absence of PEG [141]. HepG2-NTCP and HepG2-NTCP sec+ cell lines are promising for the exploration of HBV life cycle and pathogenesis in vitro. Moreover, the advantages of readily available, high reproducibility, and robust viral infection outweigh the limitations [39].

6. Phenotypic Drug Susceptibility and Resistance Testing Using Cell Culture Systems

Analyzing the functional impact of HBV mutations on antiviral efficacy requires the use of cell culture methods for phenotypic drug susceptibility and resistance testing. This approach involves introducing mutations, either naturally occurring or engineered, into HBV genomes and testing their replication capabilities in hepatoma cell lines such as HepG2 or Huh7. Cells are exposed to antiviral drugs that includes ETV or TDF to measure their inhibitory effects on viral replication [162,163]. Drug susceptibility or resistance is determined by half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values, which are derived from key outcomes such as HBV DNA levels and antigen production [162,163].
Recent studies have utilized phenotypic testing to elucidate resistance mechanisms. These studies highlight the value of phenotypic testing, prime examples being Marlet, Lier [162] demonstrating that specific polymerase mutations could significantly reduce susceptibility to ETV in the Huh7 cell line, highlighting the importance of understanding complex mutation patterns. Furthermore, Mokaya, McNaughton [164] reviewed resistance to TDF using HepG2 and Huh7 cell lines and found limited evidence for clinically significant mutations, emphasizing the need for ongoing phenotypic testing to identify rare resistance mechanisms. Moreover, Chen, Liu [163] examined the rtA181S+T184I+M204I mutation pattern in a large patient cohort using the HepG2 cell line, showing its association with multidrug resistance [163]. These findings highlight the importance of phenotypic testing in enhancing genotypic analysis and guiding treatment strategies.

7. HepG2 and HepG2-NTCP Cell Culture Systems in the Exploration of HBV Pathogenesis and Treatment for HBV Disease

In vitro and in vivo models have aided the investigation of the antiviral activity and potential toxicity of new substances. Knowledge of the NTCP cell surface receptor, major details of cccDNA, pgRNA degradation, and the HBx protein’s role in viral transcription has enabled investigations of multiple new therapeutic targets and a better understanding of the HBV life cycle [26,165]. However, more studies are needed to achieve the ultimate goal of a functional HBV cure. Hepatoma cell lines, especially HepG2 cells, have paved the way for researchers to study de novo HBV infection in simple and easy-to-use cell culture systems. This is made possible by the overexpression of NTCP in HepG2 cells [57]. Michailidis, Pabon [57] designed a robust cell culture system supporting the complete life cycle of HBV, including its spread, which allows for a better understanding of accurate therapeutic drug target sites.

7.1. HBV Entry Inhibitors

There are a number of studies that used HepG2 cells to investigate the inhibition of HBV entry inhibitors into hepatocytes prior to the identification of NTCP as a receptor in hepatocytes. The key mechanism for the viral entry is the interaction between the pre-S1 domain of L-HBsAg and NTCP (Figure 5) [166]. Some FDA-approved compounds that inhibit HBV entry were studied in HepG2 cell cultures. Among the most prominent and clinically advanced entry inhibitors is Myrcludex B (bulevirtide), a synthetic lipopeptide derived from the pre-S1 region of L-HBsAg. Myrcludex B binds with high affinity to NTCP, competitively blocking HBV (and hepatitis D virus) entry into hepatocytes and preventing new infections [167,168]. In addition, other compounds include the antihyperlipidemic ezetimibe [169], the immunosuppressant cyclosporin A and its derivatives [92,170], the angiotensin II receptor antagonist irbesartan [171], and the immunosuppressant rapamycin [172]. Another HepG2 cell culture study indicated that the green tea flavonoid epigallocatechin-3-gallate can effectively prevent the virus’s NTCP-mediated entrance [173]. All of the above highlight the potential of the HepG2 cell culture system in the exploration of the HBV pathogenesis and response to treatment, with Myrcludex B serving as a leading example of clinical applicability.

7.2. Terminal Protein Domain Inhibitors

Terminal protein domain inhibitors have been studied in HepG2 and HepG2-derived cell lines, and this is evident by the following studies: the discovery of rosmarinic acid’s ability to decrease HepG2 (and HepG2-derived) cell lines’ extracellular HBV DNA concentrations by Tsukamoto, Ikeda [174] and the identification of (Z)-2-(allylamino)-4-amino-N′-cyanothiazole-5-carboximidamide as a disruptor of ε RNA–polymerase interaction with the ability to reduced encapsidated pgRNA levels by Jo, Ryu [175]. Moreover, the studies above all demonstrated HBV DNA reduction abilities by these compounds of interest in HepG2 cell lines. There is little to no limit as to what researchers can do with a reliable HepG2-NTCP cell culture system, as they were able to demonstrate significant findings with the HepG2 cell lines above.

7.3. Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors

Targeting the reverse transcriptase (RT) domain, which is the key catalytic region of the HBV DNA polymerase, has proven to be a successful strategy for NAs for inhibiting the polymerase. NAs, after being converted to triphosphate derivatives, inhibit polymerase by competing with natural deoxyribonucleotide triphosphates and incorporate into nascent DNA. NAs lack the 3′–hydroxyl group and their incorporation into nascent DNA causes DNA elongation termination (Figure 5) [176]. A prime example of such NAs was lamivudine, which was the first NA until the newer agents, entecavir and tenofovir, were introduced to overcome developing resistance.
There are several novel compounds that have been developed in recent years that have the ability to inhibit HBV DNA replication by targeting the RT domain. Most of these studies employed HepG2 cell culture systems to identify the ability of various compounds. This is evident in the work of Higashi-Kuwata, Hayashi [177], who used HepG2.2.15 cells to show that the compound (1S, 3S, 5S, E)-3-(2-Amino-6-oxo-1,6-dihydro-9H-purin-9-yl)-2-(fluoromethylene)-5-hydroxy-1-(hydroxymethyl) cyclopentane-1-carbonitrile inhibits HBV DNA production, and Zhang, Zhai [178], who demonstrated that 2′,3′-dideoxy guanosine inhibits HBV DNA replication in HepAD38 cells. Nakajima, Watashi [179] screened 1120 compounds and identified stilbene derivatives, including piceatannol as a potential anti-HBV agent, using HepG2 cells [179]. Qiu, Gong [180] employed HepG2 cells to demonstrate the ability of phenyl propionamide derivatives to inhibit HBV [180]. Parvez, Rehman [181] demonstrated that quercetin, baccatin III, psoralen, embelin, menisdaurin, and azadirachtin have the ability to inhibit hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) production [181]. Ohsaki and Ueda [182] identified that suramin inhibited HBV in NTCP/G2. Further studies by Wang, Zhang [183], showed that 2-arylthio-5-iodopyrimidin analogues were good HBV polymerase inhibitors.

7.4. Ribonuclease H Inhibitors

Ribonuclease H (RNase H) is responsible for cleaving the RNA strand of a RNA–DNA hybrid during reverse transcription to allow complementary DNA strand synthesis. Therefore, to prevent viral replication, inhibition of RNase H is required, which prevents the cleavage of the RNA strand, leading to the accumulation of RNA–DNA duplexes inside capsids [184]. There are two classes of RNase H inhibitors (RHIs), alpha-hydroxytropolones (α-HTs) and N-hydroxyimides. Interestingly, αHTs have the ability to inhibit HIV and HBV RNase H [185,186]. Several studies have been conducted to gain a better understanding of α-HTs as RNase H inhibitors [187,188,189]. HepG2 cells and HepG2-derived cell lines have been employed to explore RHIs and their potential in the elimination of HBV. In one of the recent studies, Huber, Michailidis [190] demonstrated that analogues belonging to the class HPD inhibited HBV DNA synthesis in HepAD38 cells. Another study by Lomonosova, Zlotnick [191] examined the efficacy of RHIs (HID and α-HT) against HBV DNA synthesis in combination with 3TC and an experimental core protein allosteric modulator and found a beneficial synergistic effect in a HepG2-derived cell line [191]. In a more recent study, Chauhan, Li [192] demonstrated the suppression of cccDNA formation and inhibition of HBV during infection by RHIs in HBV-infected human hepatoma cell lines [192].

7.5. Inhibiting HBV Through Host-Polymerase Interactions

HBV polymerase depends on host factors such as tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase (TDP2) to promote viral DNA replication, which could be targeted for the development of anti-HBV agents [193]. Inhibition of RNAi-mediated TDP2 in human cells reduces the rcDNA to cccDNA conversion rate [47]. Another host enzyme, myxovirus resistance protein 2 (MX2) inhibits the rcDNA to cccDNA conversion rate in hepatoma cells and primary hepatocytes [194]. Another additional study showed that heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) decreases capsid formation and virus particles in HepG2.2.15 cells and synergistically promotes capsid assembly with HSP90 [195]. HSPs, including HSP70 and HSP90, have been found to mediate HBV polymerase interactions [196,197,198]. Some studies have also shown that DDX3, another host factor, binds to HBV polymerase independently of pgRNA and inhibits HBV replication in hepatoma and non-hepatoma cells [199]. Although current studies demonstrating host-polymerase interactions on HepG2 cells and their derivatives are still limited, finding the essential interactions that HBV polymerase requires for replication of DNA could result in discovering new therapeutic targets that can successfully inhibit HBV infections. Therefore, more research is necessary to close the gaps and propel our knowledge of host-polymerase interactions toward the better HBV therapeutics.

7.6. Capsid Inhibitors

Capsid inhibitors, particularly capsid assembly modulators (CAMs), are a key class of agents being investigated for their ability to disrupt nucleocapsid formation and thereby interfere with HBV replication and cccDNA formation (Figure 5) [200,201,202]. Compounds such as GLS4 and JNJ-56136379 have demonstrated significant efficacy in HepG2.2.15 cells by reducing HBV DNA levels and preventing cccDNA formation [200,201,202]. These in vitro studies using HepG2.2.15 cells have demonstrated that CAMs can effectively reduce HBV DNA levels and prevent the establishment of cccDNA in infected hepatocytes, suggesting that CAMs could be potent antiviral agents for chronic HBV management [200,202].

7.7. siRNAs and Antisense Oligonucleotides (ASOs)

Small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and ASOs represent another promising RNA interference-based therapeutic strategy targeting HBV at the transcriptional level (Figure 5). These molecules degrade HBV RNA, leading to reduced expression of viral proteins such as HBsAg [201]. HepG2-NTCP cells provide a reliable model for evaluating these RNA-targeting therapies. Evidently, the HBV RNA destabilizer AB-452 demonstrated significant antiviral activity by reducing HBV RNA, DNA, and antigens in HepG2-NTCP cells [201]. These findings suggest that further tests on siRNAs and ASOs are critical for translating these findings into clinical application.

7.8. cccDNA Formation Inhibitors

Inhibition of cccDNA formation is a critical strategy for achieving a functional cure for HBV. cccDNA is a persistent form of the viral genome that resides in the nucleus of infected hepatocytes (Figure 5) [203]. HepG2-NTCP cells have been instrumental in evaluating cccDNA formation inhibitors, such as disubstituted sulfonamides (CCC-0975 and CCC-0346), which impair the conversion of rcDNA to cccDNA [203]. Studies employing HepG2-NTCP cells have demonstrated that these inhibitors can effectively reduce cccDNA levels, highlighting their potential as therapeutic agents [203]. Both di-substituted sulfonamides have been tested in HepG2-derived cells and shown to significantly impair the conversion of rcDNA into cccDNA [200].
Gene editing, particularly CRISPR/Cas9, has significantly advanced the study of cccDNA formation and its inhibition in HBV research. When combined with robust and physiologically relevant cell culture systems, such as HepG2-NTCP and differentiated HepaRG cells, gene editing enables the precise manipulation of both host and viral factors that regulate cccDNA synthesis and persistence [204,205]. CRISPR/Cas9 has been used to target HBV DNA directly or to knock out host genes critical for viral replication and cccDNA maintenance, offering a unique approach for evaluating potential inhibitors of cccDNA formation [25]. These integrated systems provide a valuable platform for screening novel antiviral agents and elucidating the molecular pathways that sustain HBV infections. In hepatocyte-derived cells, Cas9 and guide RNA can be efficiently transduced using modified delivery systems, often using AAV vectors [206]. Additionally, these platforms can serve as preclinical models for developing cccDNA-targeted antiviral therapies and for evaluating gene-editing efficacy and specificity [111].

7.9. Genetic Targeting of Host Factors

Host-directed therapies represent another promising approach in addition to direct antiviral agents, host factors involved in the HBV life cycle are being explored as novel targets. DNA polymerase κ (POLK) has been identified as a host enzyme involved in cccDNA formation [207]. Silencing POLK expression using siRNA in HepG2-NTCP cells impairs cccDNA synthesis, providing insights into virus–host interactions and offering alternative antiviral strategies [207].

8. Conclusions and Future Developments

HBV infection continues to be a significant global cause of mortality. Despite the success of nucleoside analogue antivirals in HBV treatment, it remains prone to resistance and is not curative. Over the years, advancements in cell culture systems for investigating HBV pathogenesis and treatment responses have greatly benefited public health. These improved systems offer crucial insights into HBV life cycles, virus–host interactions, and therapeutic effectiveness, as highlighted in this review. The refinement of cell culture models, including innovations such as primary hepatocyte cultures, and other mentioned cell lines, has enabled more accurate study outcomes. Consequently, these models have been essential in enhancing preclinical research, supporting the development of more effective treatments and vaccines against HBV. In vitro cell culture systems have potential for exploring molecular mechanisms of the complex HBV genetic diversity and its diverse clinical presentations. Furthermore, the HepG2 cell line and its derivatives have paved the way for identifying multiple drug targets. This is evident by the studies presented above. However, there is still a long way to go in research to achieve the goal of eliminating HBV as a health threat. The development of therapeutic targets for antiviral agents relies on in vitro cell culture systems as the first stage in drug development. The discovery of NTCP as a receptor for HBV [19,20] allowed researchers to develop the HepG2-NTCP cell culture system, supporting the study of the complete life cycle and spread [57]. This opened an array of opportunities to study HBV pathogenesis and its potential cure using a relatively simple and reliable system.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, N.M.; Writing—original draft preparation, T.S.; Writing—review and editing, N.M., L.M., L.X. and A.A.C.; Supervision, N.M.; Project administration and Funding acquisition, N.M. and A.A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the University of KwaZulu-Natal, Capacity Development Programme (UCDP).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

ARVantiretroviral
AASLDAmerican Association for the Study of Liver Diseases
ASOsantisense oligonucleotides
ARTantiretroviral therapy
ALTalanine aminotransferase
α-HTsalpha-hydroxytropolones
CAMscapsid assembly modulators
cccDNAcovalently closed circular deoxyribonucleic acid
CYP450cytochrome P450 enzymes
CMV-IEcytomegalovirus immediate-early
DAAsdirect-acting antivirals
DNAdeoxyribonucleic acid
DMSOdimethyl sulfoxide
FTCemtricitabine
FDAFood and Drug Administration
GFPgreen fluorescent protein
IC50half-maximal inhibitory concentration
HBxHBV X protein
HBVHepatitis B virus
HCVhepatitis C virus
HBeAghepatitis B e antigen
HBcAghepatitis B core antigen
HBsAghepatitis B surface antigen
HSPGsheparan sulphate proteoglycans
HLCshepatocyte-like cells
HSPGheparan sulphate proteoglycan
HCChepatocellular carcinoma
HMMhepatocyte maintenance medium
HepG2 cellshuman hepatoblastoma cell line
HepG2-NTCP cellHepG2-sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide
HepaRG cellshuman hepatic bipotent progenitor cell line
Huh7human liver carcinoma cell line
Huh7-NTCPHuh7-sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide
HepAD38 (EF9,EFS19) cellsliver-derived cell lines
HepG2.2.15 cellshuman hepatoblastoma cell line
HSP90heat shock protein 90
HSP70heat shock protein 70
HAARThighly active antiretroviral therapy
HTShigh-throughput screening
HTAshost-targeting antivirals
HIVhuman immunodeficiency virus
iPSCsinducible pluripotent stem cells
3TClamivudine
miRNA-122microRNA-122
MOImultiplicity of infection
MX2myxovirus resistance protein 2
NAsnucleos(t)ide analogues
ORFopen reading frame
PHHprimary human hepatocyte
PEGpoly-ethylene glycol
pgRNApregenomic RNA
POLKDNA polymerase κ
RTreverse transcriptase
RNase Hribonuclease H
RHIsRNase H inhibitors
rcDNArelaxed circular deoxyribonucleic acid
siRNAssmall interfering RNAs
SNPssingle nucleotide polymorphisms
NTCPsodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide
TDFtenofovir disoproxil fumarate
TAFtenofovir alafenamide
EASLEuropean Association for the Study of the Liver
APASLAsian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver
TPterminal protein
2Dtwo-dimensional
3Dthree-dimensional
TDP2tyrosyl-DNA-phosphodiesterase 2
CDCU.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

References

  1. WHO. Hepatitis B. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/hepatitis-b (accessed on 2 July 2024).
  2. CDC. Fast Facts: Global Hepatitis B Vaccination. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/global-hepatitis-b-vaccination/data-research/index.html#:~:text=Approximately%20296%20million%20people1,liver)%2C%20and%20liver%20failure (accessed on 2 July 2024).
  3. Faniyi, A.A.; Okesanya, O.J.; Manirambona, E.; Oso, T.A.; Olaleke, N.O.; Nukpezah, R.N.; Ilesanmi, A.O.; Lucero-Prisno, D.E., III. Advancing public health policies to combat Hepatitis B in Africa: Challenges, advances, and recommendations for meeting 2030 targets. J. Med. Surg. Public Health 2024, 2, 100058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Seremba, E.; Ssempijja, V.; Kalibbala, S.; Gray, R.H.; Wawer, M.J.; Nalugoda, F.; Casper, C.; Phipps, W.; Ocama, P.; Serwadda, D. Hepatitis B incidence and prevention with antiretroviral therapy among HIV-positive individuals in Uganda. Aids 2017, 31, 781–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Yardeni, D.; Chang, K.-M.; Ghany, M.G. Current best practice in hepatitis B management and understanding long-term prospects for cure. Gastroenterology 2023, 164, 42–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. CLINICALINFO.HIV.GOV. Considerations for Antiretroviral Use in Patients with Coinfections. Available online: https://clinicalinfo.hiv.gov/en/guidelines/hiv-clinical-guidelines-adult-and-adolescent-arv/hepatitis-b-virus-hiv-coinfection (accessed on 3 July 2024).
  7. WHO. Guidelines for the Prevention, Care, and Treatment of Persons with Chronic Hepatitis B Infection. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549059 (accessed on 7 December 2024).
  8. Lai-Hung Wong, G.; Lemoine, M. The 2024 updated WHO guidelines for the prevention and management of chronic hepatitis B: Main changes and potential implications for the next major liver society clinical practice guidelines. J. Hepatol. 2025, 82, 918–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Terrault, N.A.; Lok, A.S.; McMahon, B.J.; Chang, K.M.; Hwang, J.P.; Jonas, M.M.; Brown, R.S., Jr.; Bzowej, N.H.; Wong, J.B. Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance. Hepatology 2018, 67, 1560–1599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lampertico, P.; Agarwal, K.; Berg, T.; Buti, M.; Janssen, H.L.; Papatheodoridis, G.; Zoulim, F.; Tacke, F. EASL 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatitis B virus infection. J. Hepatol. 2017, 67, 370–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sarin, S.; Kumar, M.; Lau, G.; Abbas, Z.; Chan, H.; Chen, C.; Chen, D.; Chen, H.; Chen, P.; Chien, R. Asian-Pacific clinical practice guidelines on the management of hepatitis B: A 2015 update. Hepatol. Int. 2016, 10, 1–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C: Final update of the series (☆). J. Hepatol. 2020, 73, 1170–1218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the Prevention Care and Treatment of Persons with Chronic Hepatitis B Infection; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  14. Wedemeyer, H.; Schöneweis, K.; Bogomolov, P.; Blank, A.; Voronkova, N.; Stepanova, T.; Sagalova, O.; Chulanov, V.; Osipenko, M.; Morozov, V. Safety and efficacy of bulevirtide in combination with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in patients with hepatitis B virus and hepatitis D virus coinfection (MYR202): A multicentre, randomised, parallel-group, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2023, 23, 117–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sibiya, T.; Ghazi, T.; Chuturgoon, A. The potential of spirulina platensis to ameliorate the adverse effects of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Nutrients 2022, 14, 3076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Howell, J.; Pedrana, A.; Schroeder, S.E.; Scott, N.; Aufegger, L.; Atun, R.; Baptista-Leite, R.; Hirnschall, G.; Hutchinson, S.J.; Lazarus, J.V. A global investment framework for the elimination of hepatitis B. J. Hepatol. 2021, 74, 535–549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wong, G.L.-H.; Wong, V.W.-S. Eliminating hepatitis B virus as a global health threat. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2016, 16, 1313–1314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xu, M.; Terrault, N.A. Hepatitis B Virus Elimination Strategies. Curr. Hepatol. Rep. 2024, 23, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ni, Y.; Lempp, F.A.; Mehrle, S.; Nkongolo, S.; Kaufman, C.; Fälth, M.; Stindt, J.; Königer, C.; Nassal, M.; Kubitz, R. Hepatitis B and D viruses exploit sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide for species-specific entry into hepatocytes. Gastroenterology 2014, 146, 1070–1083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Yan, H.; Zhong, G.; Xu, G.; He, W.; Jing, Z.; Gao, Z.; Huang, Y.; Qi, Y.; Peng, B.; Wang, H. Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide is a functional receptor for human hepatitis B and D virus. eLife 2012, 1, e00049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jain, A.K.; Singh, D.; Dubey, K.; Maurya, R.; Mittal, S.; Pandey, A.K. Models and methods for in vitro toxicity. In In Vitro Toxicology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; pp. 45–65. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ramirez, T.; Strigun, A.; Verlohner, A.; Huener, H.-A.; Peter, E.; Herold, M.; Bordag, N.; Mellert, W.; Walk, T.; Spitzer, M. Prediction of liver toxicity and mode of action using metabolomics in vitro in HepG2 cells. Arch. Toxicol. 2018, 92, 893–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk to Humans. Biological Agents; International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, France, 2012. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK304352/#:~:text=HBV%20is%20an%20enveloped%20virus,bound%20to%20the%20viral%20polymerase. (accessed on 14 August 2024).
  24. Magnius, L.; Taylor, J.; Mason, W.S.; Sureau, C.; Dény, P.; Norder, H.; Consortium, I.R. ICTV virus taxonomy profile: Deltavirus. J. Gen. Virol. 2018, 99, 1565–1566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Seeger, C.; Mason, W.S. Molecular biology of hepatitis B virus infection. Virology 2015, 479, 672–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Revill, P.; Testoni, B.; Locarnini, S.; Zoulim, F. Global strategies are required to cure and eliminate HBV infection. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 13, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dryden, K.A.; Wieland, S.F.; Whitten-Bauer, C.; Gerin, J.L.; Chisari, F.V.; Yeager, M. Native hepatitis B virions and capsids visualized by electron cryomicroscopy. Mol. Cell 2006, 22, 843–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Le Seyec, J.; Chouteau, P.; Cannie, I.; Guguen-Guillouzo, C.; Gripon, P. Role of the pre-S2 domain of the large envelope protein in hepatitis B virus assembly and infectivity. J. Virol. 1998, 72, 5573–5578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Blanchet, M.; Sureau, C. Infectivity determinants of the hepatitis B virus pre-S domain are confined to the N-terminal 75 amino acid residues. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 5841–5849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Schulze, A.; Schieck, A.; Ni, Y.; Mier, W.; Urban, S. Fine mapping of pre-S sequence requirements for hepatitis B virus large envelope protein-mediated receptor interaction. J. Virol. 2010, 84, 1989–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kao, J.-H.; Chen, P.-J.; Chen, D.-S. Recent advances in the research of hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: Epidemiologic and molecular biological aspects. Adv. Cancer Res. 2010, 108, 21–72. [Google Scholar]
  32. Chen, B.F.; Liu, C.J.; Jow, G.M.; Chen, P.J.; Kao, J.H.; Chen, D.S. High prevalence and mapping of pre-S deletion in hepatitis B virus carriers with progressive liver diseases. Gastroenterology 2006, 130, 1153–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Miyanohara, A.; Imamura, T.; Araki, M.; Sugawara, K.; Ohtomo, N.; Matsubara, K. Expression of hepatitis B virus core antigen gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Synthesis of two polypeptides translated from different initiation codons. J. Virol. 1986, 59, 176–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Kramvis, A.; Kostaki, E.-G.; Hatzakis, A.; Paraskevis, D. Immunomodulatory function of HBeAg related to short-sighted evolution, transmissibility, and clinical manifestation of hepatitis B virus. Front. Microbiol. 2018, 9, 2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hadziyannis, S.J.; Lieberman, H.M.; Karvountzis, G.G.; Shafritz, D.A. Analysis of Liver Disease, Nuclear HBcAg, Viral Replication, and Hepatitis B Virus DNA in Liver and Serum of HBcAg Vs. Anti-HBe Positive Carriers of Hepatitis B Virus. Hepatology 1983, 3, 656–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Liang, T.J.; Ghany, M. Hepatitis B e Antigen—The Dangerous Endgame of Hepatitis B. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 347, 208–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Ponzetto, A.; Hoyer, B.H.; Popper, H.; Engle, R.; Purcell, R.H.; Gerin, J.L. Titration of the Infectivity of Hepatitis D Virus in Chimpanzees. J. Infect. Dis. 1987, 155, 72–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Polakoff, S. Transmission from mother to infant of hepatitis B virus infection. Midwives Chron. 1983, 96, 4–5. [Google Scholar]
  39. Lee, G.S.; Purdy, M.A.; Choi, Y. Cell Culture Systems for Studying Hepatitis B and Hepatitis D Virus Infections. Life 2023, 13, 1527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Chen, P.J.; Kalpana, G.; Goldberg, J.; Mason, W.; Werner, B.; Gerin, J.; Taylor, J. Structure and replication of the genome of the hepatitis delta virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1986, 83, 8774–8778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Engelke, M.; Mills, K.; Seitz, S.; Simon, P.; Gripon, P.; Schnölzer, M.; Urban, S. Characterization of a hepatitis B and hepatitis delta virus receptor binding site. Hepatology 2006, 43, 750–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Barrera, A.; Guerra, B.; Notvall, L.; Lanford, R.E. Mapping of the hepatitis B virus pre-S1 domain involved in receptor recognition. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 9786–9798. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Xia, Y.P.; Yeh, C.-T.; Ou, J.-H.; Lai, M. Characterization of nuclear targeting signal of hepatitis delta antigen: Nuclear transport as a protein complex. J. Virol. 1992, 66, 914–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Cooper, A.; Shaul, Y. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis and lysosomal cleavage of hepatitis B virus capsid-like core particles. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281, 16563–16569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rabe, B.; Glebe, D.; Kann, M. Lipid-mediated introduction of hepatitis B virus capsids into nonsusceptible cells allows highly efficient replication and facilitates the study of early infection events. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 5465–5473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Kann, M.; Schmitz, A.; Rabe, B. Intracellular transport of hepatitis B virus. World J. Gastroenterol. WJG 2007, 13, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Königer, C.; Wingert, I.; Marsmann, M.; Rösler, C.; Beck, J.; Nassal, M. Involvement of the host DNA-repair enzyme TDP2 in formation of the covalently closed circular DNA persistence reservoir of hepatitis B viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, E4244–E4253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sun, D.; Nassal, M. Stable HepG2-and Huh7-based human hepatoma cell lines for efficient regulated expression of infectious hepatitis B virus. J. Hepatol. 2006, 45, 636–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Jun-Bin, S.; Zhi, C.; Wei-Qin, N.; Jun, F. A quantitative method to detect HBV cccDNA by chimeric primer and real-time polymerase chain reaction. J. Virol. Methods 2003, 112, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wei, L.; Ploss, A. Mechanism of hepatitis B virus cccDNA formation. Viruses 2021, 13, 1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jones, S.A.; Boregowda, R.; Spratt, T.E.; Hu, J. In vitro epsilon RNA-dependent protein priming activity of human hepatitis B virus polymerase. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 5134–5150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Hu, J.; Flores, D.; Toft, D.; Wang, X.; Nguyen, D. Requirement of heat shock protein 90 for human hepatitis B virus reverse transcriptase function. J. Virol. 2004, 78, 13122–13131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hu, J.; Anselmo, D. In vitro reconstitution of a functional duck hepatitis B virus reverse transcriptase: Posttranslational activation by Hsp90. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 11447–11455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bertoletti, A.; Ferrari, C. Republished: Innate and adaptive immune responses in chronic hepatitis B virus infections: Towards restoration of immune control of viral infection. Postgrad. Med. J. 2013, 89, 294–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Lechardeur, D.; Sohn, K.; Haardt, M.; Joshi, P.; Monck, M.; Graham, R.; Beatty, B.; Squire, J.; O’brodovich, H.; Lukacs, G. Metabolic instability of plasmid DNA in the cytosol: A potential barrier to gene transfer. Gene Ther. 1999, 6, 482–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, X.; Le, N.; Denoth-Lippuner, A.; Barral, Y.; Kroschewski, R. Asymmetric partitioning of transfected DNA during mammalian cell division. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, 7177–7182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Michailidis, E.; Pabon, J.; Xiang, K.; Park, P.; Ramanan, V.; Hoffmann, H.-H.; Schneider, W.M.; Bhatia, S.N.; de Jong, Y.P.; Shlomai, A. A robust cell culture system supporting the complete life cycle of hepatitis B virus. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Allweiss, L.; Dandri, M. The role of cccDNA in HBV maintenance. Viruses 2017, 9, 156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gunther, S.; Li, B.C.; Miska, S.; Kruger, D.H.; Meisel, H.; Will, H. A novel method for efficient amplification of whole hepatitis B virus genomes permits rapid functional analysis and reveals deletion mutants in immunosuppressed patients. J. Virol. 1995, 69, 5437–5444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Sells, M.A.; Chen, M.-L.; Acs, G. Production of hepatitis B virus particles in Hep G2 cells transfected with cloned hepatitis B virus DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1987, 84, 1005–1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lentz, T.B.; Loeb, D.D. Development of cell cultures that express hepatitis B virus to high levels and accumulate cccDNA. J. Virol. Methods 2010, 169, 52–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Gripon, P.; Diot, C.; Theze, N.; Fourel, I.; Loreal, O.; Brechot, C.; Guguen-Guillouzo, C. Hepatitis B virus infection of adult human hepatocytes cultured in the presence of dimethyl sulfoxide. J. Virol. 1988, 62, 4136–4143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Levy, G.; Bomze, D.; Heinz, S.; Ramachandran, S.D.; Noerenberg, A.; Cohen, M.; Shibolet, O.; Sklan, E.; Braspenning, J.; Nahmias, Y. Long-term culture and expansion of primary human hepatocytes. Nat. Biotechnol. 2015, 33, 1264–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Kidambi, S.; Yarmush, R.S.; Novik, E.; Chao, P.; Yarmush, M.L.; Nahmias, Y. Oxygen-mediated enhancement of primary hepatocyte metabolism, functional polarization, gene expression, and drug clearance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 15714–15719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yoneda, M.; Hyun, J.; Jakubski, S.; Saito, S.; Nakajima, A.; Schiff, E.R.; Thomas, E. Hepatitis B virus and DNA stimulation trigger a rapid innate immune response through NF-κB. J. Immunol. 2016, 197, 630–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Luangsay, S.; Gruffaz, M.; Isorce, N.; Testoni, B.; Michelet, M.; Faure-Dupuy, S.; Maadadi, S.; Ait-Goughoulte, M.; Parent, R.; Rivoire, M. Early inhibition of hepatocyte innate responses by hepatitis B virus. J. Hepatol. 2015, 63, 1314–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Verrier, E.R.; Colpitts, C.C.; Schuster, C.; Zeisel, M.B.; Baumert, T.F. Cell culture models for the investigation of hepatitis B and D virus infection. Viruses 2016, 8, 261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zeisel, M.B.; Lucifora, J.; Mason, W.S.; Sureau, C.; Beck, J.; Levrero, M.; Kann, M.; Knolle, P.A.; Benkirane, M.; Durantel, D. Towards an HBV cure: State-of-the-art and unresolved questions—Report of the ANRS workshop on HBV cure. Gut 2015, 64, 1314–1326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Bhogal, R.H.; Hodson, J.; Bartlett, D.C.; Weston, C.J.; Curbishley, S.M.; Haughton, E.; Williams, K.T.; Reynolds, G.M.; Newsome, P.N.; Adams, D.H. Isolation of primary human hepatocytes from normal and diseased liver tissue: A one hundred liver experience. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e18222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Allweiss, L.; Strick-Marchand, H. In-vitro and in-vivo models for hepatitis B cure research. J. Clin. Investig. Hepatol. 2020, 15, 173–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Schulze-Bergkamen, H.; Untergasser, A.; Dax, A.; Vogel, H.; Büchler, P.; Klar, E.; Lehnert, T.; Friess, H.; Büchler, M.W.; Kirschfink, M. Primary human hepatocytes–a valuable tool for investigation of apoptosis and hepatitis B virus infection. J. Hepatol. 2003, 38, 736–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Rijntjes, P.; Moshage, H.; Van Gemert, P.; De Waal, R.; Yap, S. Cryopreservation of adult human hepatocytes: The influence of deep freezing storage on the viability, cell seeding, survival, fine structures and albumin synthesis in primary cultures. J. Hepatol. 1986, 3, 7–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Ishida, Y.; Yamasaki, C.; Yanagi, A.; Yoshizane, Y.; Fujikawa, K.; Watashi, K.; Abe, H.; Wakita, T.; Hayes, C.N.; Chayama, K. Novel robust in vitro hepatitis B virus infection model using fresh human hepatocytes isolated from humanized mice. Am. J. Pathol. 2015, 185, 1275–1285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ulvestad, M.; Darnell, M.; Molden, E.; Ellis, E.; Åsberg, A.; Andersson, T.B. Evaluation of organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B1 and CYP3A4 activities in primary human hepatocytes and HepaRG cells cultured in a dynamic three-dimensional bioreactor system. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2012, 343, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Tostões, R.M.; Leite, S.B.; Serra, M.; Jensen, J.; Björquist, P.; Carrondo, M.J.; Brito, C.; Alves, P.M. Human liver cell spheroids in extended perfusion bioreactor culture for repeated-dose drug testing. Hepatology 2012, 55, 1227–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Vorrink, S.U.; Ullah, S.; Schmidt, S.; Nandania, J.; Velagapudi, V.; Beck, O.; Ingelman-Sundberg, M.; Lauschke, V.M. Endogenous and xenobiotic metabolic stability of primary human hepatocytes in long-term 3D spheroid cultures revealed by a combination of targeted and untargeted metabolomics. FASEB J. 2017, 31, 2696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ochiya, T.; Tsurimoto, T.; Ueda, K.; Okubo, K.; Shiozawa, M.; Matsubara, K. An in vitro system for infection with hepatitis B virus that uses primary human fetal hepatocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1989, 86, 1875–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Lázaro, C.A.; Croager, E.J.; Mitchell, C.; Campbell, J.S.; Yu, C.; Foraker, J.; Rhim, J.A.; Yeoh, G.C.; Fausto, N. Establishment, characterization, and long-term maintenance of cultures of human fetal hepatocytes. Hepatology 2003, 38, 1095–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Xu, R.; Hu, P.; Li, Y.; Tian, A.; Li, J.; Zhu, C. Advances in HBV infection and replication systems in vitro. Virol. J. 2021, 18, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, G.-Q.; Xu, W.-Z.; Wang, J.-X.; Deng, W.-W.; Li, D.; Gu, H.-X. Combination of small interfering RNA and lamivudine on inhibition of human B virus replication in HepG2. 2.15 cells. World J. Gastroenterol. WJG 2007, 13, 2324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Indrasetiawan, P.; Aoki-Utsubo, C.; Hanafi, M.; Hartati, S.; Wahyuni, T.S.; Kameoka, M.; Yano, Y.; Hotta, H.; Hayashi, Y. Antiviral activity of cananga odorata against hepatitis B virus. Kobe J. Med. Sci. 2019, 65, E71. [Google Scholar]
  82. Yang, P.L.; Althage, A.; Chung, J.; Chisari, F.V. Hydrodynamic injection of viral DNA: A mouse model of acute hepatitis B virus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 13825–13830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Lucifora, J.; Vincent, I.E.; Berthillon, P.; Dupinay, T.; Michelet, M.; Protzer, U.; Zoulim, F.; Durantel, D.; Trepo, C.; Chemin, I. Hepatitis B virus replication in primary macaque hepatocytes: Crossing the species barrier toward a new small primate model. Hepatology 2010, 51, 1954–1960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wang, F.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Hui, L.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X. Effect of fibronectin on HBV infection in primary human fetal hepatocytes in vitro. Mol. Med. Rep. 2012, 6, 1145–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Zhou, M.; Zhao, F.; Li, J.; Cheng, Z.; Tian, X.; Zhi, X.; Huang, Y.; Hu, K. Long-term maintenance of human fetal hepatocytes and prolonged susceptibility to HBV infection by co-culture with non-parenchymal cells. J. Virol. Methods 2014, 195, 185–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Lin, M.; Chen, Q.; Yang, L.-Y.; Li, W.-Y.; Cao, X.-B.; Wu, J.-R.; Peng, Y.-P.; Chen, M.-R. Hepatitis B virus infection and replication in primarily cultured human fetal hepatocytes. World J. Gastroenterol. WJG 2007, 13, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Galle, P.R.; Hagelstein, J.; Kommerell, B.; Volkmann, M.; Schranz, P.; Zentgraf, H. In vitro experimental infection of primary human hepatocytes with hepatitis B virus. Gastroenterology 1994, 106, 664–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lauschke, V.M.; Shafagh, R.Z.; Hendriks, D.F.; Ingelman-Sundberg, M. 3D primary hepatocyte culture systems for analyses of liver diseases, drug metabolism, and toxicity: Emerging culture paradigms and applications. Biotechnol. J. 2019, 14, 1800347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Rose, K.A.; Holman, N.S.; Green, A.M.; Andersen, M.E.; LeCluyse, E.L. Co-culture of hepatocytes and Kupffer cells as an in vitro model of inflammation and drug-induced hepatotoxicity. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 105, 950–964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Glebe, D.; Aliakbari, M.; Krass, P.; Knoop, E.V.; Valerius, K.P.; Gerlich, W.H. Pre-s1 antigen-dependent infection of Tupaia hepatocyte cultures with human hepatitis B virus. J. Virol. 2003, 77, 9511–9521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Baumert, T.F.; Yang, C.; Schürmann, P.; Köck, J.; Ziegler, C.; Grüllich, C.; Nassal, M.; Liang, T.J.; Blum, H.E.; Von Weizsäcker, F. Hepatitis B virus mutations associated with fulminant hepatitis induce apoptosis in primary Tupaia hepatocytes. Hepatology 2005, 41, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Nkongolo, S.; Ni, Y.; Lempp, F.A.; Kaufman, C.; Lindner, T.; Esser-Nobis, K.; Lohmann, V.; Mier, W.; Mehrle, S.; Urban, S. Cyclosporin A inhibits hepatitis B and hepatitis D virus entry by cyclophilin-independent interference with the NTCP receptor. J. Hepatol. 2014, 60, 723–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Schulze, A.; Mills, K.; Weiss, T.S.; Urban, S. Hepatocyte polarization is essential for the productive entry of the hepatitis B virus. Hepatology 2012, 55, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Gripon, P.; Cannie, I.; Urban, S. Efficient inhibition of hepatitis B virus infection by acylated peptides derived from the large viral surface protein. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 1613–1622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Aninat, C.; Piton, A.; Glaise, D.; Le Charpentier, T.; Langouët, S.; Morel, F.; Guguen-Guillouzo, C.; Guillouzo, A. Expression of cytochromes P450, conjugating enzymes and nuclear receptors in human hepatoma HepaRG cells. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2006, 34, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Marion, M.-J.; Hantz, O.; Durantel, D. The HepaRG Cell Line: Biological Properties and Relevance as a Tool for Cell Biology, Drug Metabolism, and Virology Studies. In Hepatocytes: Methods and Protocols; Methods in Molecular Biology; Guillouzo, A., Ed.; Springer: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2010; Volume 640, pp. 261–272. [Google Scholar]
  97. Shlomai, A.; Schwartz, R.E.; Ramanan, V.; Bhatta, A.; de Jong, Y.P.; Bhatia, S.N.; Rice, C.M. Modeling host interactions with hepatitis B virus using primary and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocellular systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 12193–12198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Gómez-Lechón, M.J.; Tolosa, L. Human hepatocytes derived from pluripotent stem cells: A promising cell model for drug hepatotoxicity screening. Arch. Toxicol. 2016, 90, 2049–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Nie, Y.-Z.; Zheng, Y.-W.; Miyakawa, K.; Murata, S.; Zhang, R.-R.; Sekine, K.; Ueno, Y.; Takebe, T.; Wakita, T.; Ryo, A. Recapitulation of hepatitis B virus–host interactions in liver organoids from human induced pluripotent stem cells. EBioMedicine 2018, 35, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Iwamoto, M.; Watashi, K.; Tsukuda, S.; Aly, H.H.; Fukasawa, M.; Fujimoto, A.; Suzuki, R.; Aizaki, H.; Ito, T.; Koiwai, O. Evaluation and identification of hepatitis B virus entry inhibitors using HepG2 cells overexpressing a membrane transporter NTCP. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 443, 808–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Nakabayashi, H.; Taketa, K.; Miyano, K.; Yamane, T.; Sato, J. Growth of human hepatoma cell lines with differentiated functions in chemically defined medium. Cancer Res. 1982, 42, 3858–3863. [Google Scholar]
  102. Chiu, J.H.; Hu, C.P.; Lui, W.Y.; Lo, S.J.; Chang, C. The formation of bile canaliculi in human hepatoma cell lines. Hepatology 1990, 11, 834–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Le, C.; Sirajee, R.; Steenbergen, R.; Joyce, M.A.; Addison, W.R.; Tyrrell, D.L. In vitro infection with hepatitis B virus using differentiated human serum culture of Huh7. 5-NTCP cells without requiring dimethyl sulfoxide. Viruses 2021, 13, 97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Vondráček, J.; Souček, K.; Sheard, M.A.; Chramostová, K.; Andrysík, Z.; Hofmanová, J.; Kozubík, A. Dimethyl sulfoxide potentiates death receptor-mediated apoptosis in the human myeloid leukemia U937 cell line through enhancement of mitochondrial membrane depolarization. Leuk. Res. 2006, 30, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Steenbergen, R.H.; Joyce, M.A.; Thomas, B.S.; Jones, D.; Law, J.; Russell, R.; Houghton, M.; Tyrrell, D.L. Human serum leads to differentiation of human hepatoma cells, restoration of very-low-density lipoprotein secretion, and a 1000-fold increase in HCV Japanese fulminant hepatitis type 1 titers. Hepatology 2013, 58, 1907–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Sprinzl, M.F.; Oberwinkler, H.; Schaller, H.; Protzer, U. Transfer of hepatitis B virus genome by adenovirus vectors into cultured cells and mice: Crossing the species barrier. J. Virol. 2001, 75, 5108–5118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Mao, Y.; Wang, X.; Hu, W.; Li, A.; Li, Y.; Huang, H.; Yan, R.; Zhang, Y.; Li, J.; Li, H.; et al. Long-term and efficient inhibition of hepatitis B virus replication by AAV8-delivered artificial microRNAs. Antivir. Res. 2022, 204, 105366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Suzuki, M.; Kondo, S.; Yamasaki, M.; Matsuda, N.; Nomoto, A.; Suzuki, T.; Saito, I.; Kanegae, Y. Efficient genome replication of hepatitis B virus using adenovirus vector: A compact pregenomic RNA-expression unit. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Mnyandu, N.Z.; Limani, S.W.; Ely, A.; Wadee, R.; Arbuthnot, P.; Maepa, M.B. Long-term inhibition of Hepatitis B virus gene expression by a primary microrna expressing ancestral adeno-associated viral vector. Virol. J. 2025, 22, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Protzer, U.; Nassal, M.; Chiang, P.-W.; Kirschfink, M.; Schaller, H. Interferon gene transfer by a hepatitis B virus vector efficiently suppresses wild-type virus infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1999, 96, 10818–10823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Stone, D.; Long, K.R.; Loprieno, M.A.; Feelixge, H.S.D.S.; Kenkel, E.J.; Liley, R.M.; Rapp, S.; Roychoudhury, P.; Nguyen, T.; Stensland, L. CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing of hepatitis B virus in chronically infected humanized mice. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 2021, 20, 258–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Hu, J.; Lin, Y.Y.; Chen, P.J.; Watashi, K.; Wakita, T. Cell and Animal Models for Studying Hepatitis B Virus Infection and Drug Development. Gastroenterology 2019, 156, 338–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Boudewijns, R.; Ma, J.; Neyts, J.; Dallmeier, K. A novel therapeutic HBV vaccine candidate induces strong polyfunctional cytotoxic T cell responses in mice. JHEP Rep. 2021, 3, 100295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Ladner, S.K.; Otto, M.J.; Barker, C.S.; Zaifert, K.; Wang, G.-H.; Guo, J.-T.; Seeger, C.; King, R.W. Inducible expression of human hepatitis B virus (HBV) in stably transfected hepatoblastoma cells: A novel system for screening potential inhibitors of HBV replication. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1997, 41, 1715–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Cai, D.; Wang, X.; Yan, R.; Mao, R.; Liu, Y.; Ji, C.; Cuconati, A.; Guo, H. Establishment of an inducible HBV stable cell line that expresses cccDNA-dependent epitope-tagged HBeAg for screening of cccDNA modulators. Antivir. Res. 2016, 132, 26–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Iwamoto, M.; Cai, D.; Sugiyama, M.; Suzuki, R.; Aizaki, H.; Ryo, A.; Ohtani, N.; Tanaka, Y.; Mizokami, M.; Wakita, T. Functional association of cellular microtubules with viral capsid assembly supports efficient hepatitis B virus replication. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 10620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Gripon, P.; Rumin, S.; Urban, S.; Le Seyec, J.; Glaise, D.; Cannie, I.; Guyomard, C.; Lucas, J.; Trepo, C.; Guguen-Guillouzo, C. Infection of a human hepatoma cell line by hepatitis B virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 15655–15660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Hantz, O.; Parent, R.; Durantel, D.; Gripon, P.; Guguen-Guillouzo, C.; Zoulim, F. Persistence of the hepatitis B virus covalently closed circular DNA in HepaRG human hepatocyte-like cells. J. Gen. Virol. 2009, 90, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Mayati, A.; Moreau, A.; Le Vée, M.; Bruyère, A.; Jouan, E.; Denizot, C.; Parmentier, Y.; Fardel, O. Functional polarization of human hepatoma HepaRG cells in response to forskolin. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Xiang, C.; Du, Y.; Meng, G.; Soon Yi, L.; Sun, S.; Song, N.; Zhang, X.; Xiao, Y.; Wang, J.; Yi, Z. Long-term functional maintenance of primary human hepatocytes in vitro. Science 2019, 364, 399–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Boess, F.; Kamber, M.; Romer, S.; Gasser, R.; Muller, D.; Albertini, S.; Suter, L. Gene expression in two hepatic cell lines, cultured primary hepatocytes, and liver slices compared to the in vivo liver gene expression in rats: Possible implications for toxicogenomics use of in vitro systems. Toxicol. Sci. 2003, 73, 386–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Rodríguez-Antona, C.; Donato, M.T.; Boobis, A.; Edwards, R.J.; Watts, P.S.; Castell, J.V.; Gómez-Lechón, M.-J. Cytochrome P450 expression in human hepatocytes and hepatoma cell lines: Molecular mechanisms that determine lower expression in cultured cells. Xenobiotica 2002, 32, 505–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Schyschka, L.; Sánchez, J.M.; Wang, Z.; Burkhardt, B.; Müller-Vieira, U.; Zeilinger, K.; Bachmann, A.; Nadalin, S.; Damm, G.; Nussler, A. Hepatic 3D cultures but not 2D cultures preserve specific transporter activity for acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity. Arch. Toxicol. 2013, 87, 1581–1593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Long-Term Culture and Coculture of Primary Rat and Human Hepatocytes. In Epithelial Cell Culture Protocols, 2nd ed.; Randell, S.H., Fulcher, M.L., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2013; pp. 287–302. [Google Scholar]
  125. Kukla, D.A.; Crampton, A.L.; Wood, D.K.; Khetani, S.R. Microscale collagen and fibroblast interactions enhance primary human hepatocyte functions in three-dimensional models. Gene Expr. 2020, 20, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Vinken, M.; Decrock, E.; Doktorova, T.; Ramboer, E.; De Vuyst, E.; Vanhaecke, T.; Leybaert, L.; Rogiers, V. Characterization of spontaneous cell death in monolayer cultures of primary hepatocytes. Arch. Toxicol. 2011, 85, 1589–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ullah, I.; Kim, Y.; Lim, M.; Oh, K.B.; Hwang, S.; Shin, Y.; Kim, Y.; Im, G.-S.; Hur, T.-Y.; Ock, S.A. In vitro 3-D culture demonstrates incompetence in improving maintenance ability of primary hepatocytes. Anim. Cells Syst. 2017, 21, 332–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Delaney IV, W.E.; Miller, T.G.; Isom, H.C. Use of the hepatitis B virus recombinant baculovirus-HepG2 system to study the effects of (−)-β-2′, 3′-dideoxy-3′-thiacytidine on replication of hepatitis B virus and accumulation of covalently closed circular DNA. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 1999, 43, 2017–2026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Delaney, W.E.; Isom, H.C. Hepatitis B virus replication in human HepG2 cells mediated by hepatitis B virus recombinant baculovirus. Hepatology 1998, 28, 1134–1146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Abdelhamed, A.M.; Kelley, C.M.; Miller, T.G.; Furman, P.A.; Isom, H.C. Rebound of hepatitis B virus replication in HepG2 cells after cessation of antiviral treatment. J. Virol. 2002, 76, 8148–8160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hofmann, C.; Sandig, V.; Jennings, G.; Rudolph, M.; Schlag, P.; Strauss, M. Efficient gene transfer into human hepatocytes by baculovirus vectors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1995, 92, 10099–10103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Hofmann, C.; Strauss, M. Baculovirus-mediated gene transfer in the presence of human serum or blood facilitated by inhibition of the complement system. Gene Ther. 1998, 5, 531–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Atienzar, F.A.; Novik, E.I.; Gerets, H.H.; Parekh, A.; Delatour, C.; Cardenas, A.; MacDonald, J.; Yarmush, M.L.; Dhalluin, S. Predictivity of dog co-culture model, primary human hepatocytes and HepG2 cells for the detection of hepatotoxic drugs in humans. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2014, 275, 44–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Bonn, B.; Svanberg, P.; Janefeldt, A.; Hultman, I.; Grime, K. Determination of human hepatocyte intrinsic clearance for slowly metabolized compounds: Comparison of a primary hepatocyte/stromal cell co-culture with plated primary hepatocytes and HepaRG. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2016, 44, 527–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Winer, B.Y.; Huang, T.S.; Pludwinski, E.; Heller, B.; Wojcik, F.; Lipkowitz, G.E.; Parekh, A.; Cho, C.; Shrirao, A.; Muir, T.W. Long-term hepatitis B infection in a scalable hepatic co-culture system. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Walter, E.; Keist, R.; Niederöst, B.; Pult, I.; Blum, H.E. Hepatitis B virus infection of tupaia hepatocytes in vitro and in vivo. Hepatology 1996, 24, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Schieck, A.; Schulze, A.; Gähler, C.; Müller, T.; Haberkorn, U.; Alexandrov, A.; Urban, S.; Mier, W. Hepatitis B virus hepatotropism is mediated by specific receptor recognition in the liver and not restricted to susceptible hosts. Hepatology 2013, 58, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Takahashi, K.; Tanabe, K.; Ohnuki, M.; Narita, M.; Ichisaka, T.; Tomoda, K.; Yamanaka, S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell 2007, 131, 861–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Sakurai, F.; Mitani, S.; Yamamoto, T.; Takayama, K.; Tachibana, M.; Watashi, K.; Wakita, T.; Iijima, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Mizuguchi, H. Human induced-pluripotent stem cell-derived hepatocyte-like cells as an in vitro model of human hepatitis B virus infection. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 45698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Jo, E.; Kim, H.; König, A.; Yang, J.; Yoon, S.K.; Windisch, M.P. Determination of infectious hepatitis B virus particles by an end-point dilution assay identifies a novel class of inhibitors. Antivir. Res. 2021, 196, 105195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Zahoor, M.A.; Kuipery, A.; Mosa, A.I.; Gehring, A.J.; Feld, J.J. HepG2-NTCP Subclones Exhibiting High Susceptibility to Hepatitis B Virus Infection. Viruses 2022, 14, 1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Hagenbuch, B.; Dawson, P. The sodium bile salt cotransport family SLC10. Pflügers Arch. 2004, 447, 566–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Yan, H.; Liu, Y.; Sui, J.; Li, W. NTCP opens the door for hepatitis B virus infection. Antivir. Res. 2015, 121, 24–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Anwer, M.S.; Stieger, B. Sodium-dependent bile salt transporters of the SLC10A transporter family: More than solute transporters. Pflügers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 2014, 466, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Elinger, S. HBV: Stowaway of NTCP. Clin. Res. Hepatol. Gastroenterol. 2014, 38, 661–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Tsukuda, S.; Watashi, K.; Iwamoto, M.; Suzuki, R.; Aizaki, H.; Okada, M.; Sugiyama, M.; Kojima, S.; Tanaka, Y.; Mizokami, M. Dysregulation of retinoic acid receptor diminishes hepatocyte permissiveness to hepatitis B virus infection through modulation of sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP) expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 5673–5684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Yan, R.; Zhang, Y.; Cai, D.; Liu, Y.; Cuconati, A.; Guo, H. Spinoculation enhances HBV infection in NTCP-reconstituted hepatocytes. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0129889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Li, H.; Zhuang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lin, Y.; Yuan, Q.; Xia, N. HBV life cycle is restricted in mouse hepatocytes expressing human NTCP. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2014, 11, 175–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Schulze, A.; Gripon, P.; Urban, S. Hepatitis B virus infection initiates with a large surface protein–dependent binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Hepatology 2007, 46, 1759–1768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Umetsu, T.; Inoue, J.; Kogure, T.; Kakazu, E.; Ninomiya, M.; Iwata, T.; Takai, S.; Nakamura, T.; Sano, A.; Shimosegawa, T. Inhibitory effect of silibinin on hepatitis B virus entry. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2018, 14, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Sibiya, T.; Ghazi, T.; Mohan, J.; Nagiah, S.; Chuturgoon, A.A. Spirulina platensis ameliorates oxidative stress associated with antiretroviral drugs in hepg2 cells. Plants 2022, 11, 3143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Sibiya, T.; Ghazi, T.; Mohan, J.; Nagiah, S.; Chuturgoon, A.A. Spirulina platensis mitigates the inhibition of selected miRNAs that promote inflammation in HAART-treated HepG2 cells. Plants 2022, 12, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Xin, X.-m.; Li, G.-q.; Guan, X.-r.; Li, D.; Xu, W.-z.; Jin, Y.-Y.; Gu, H. Combination therapy of siRNAs mediates greater suppression on hepatitis B virus cccDNA in HepG2. 2.15 cell. Hepato-Gastroenterol. 2008, 55, 2178–2183. [Google Scholar]
  154. Li, X.; Xu, Z.; Mitra, B.; Wang, M.; Guo, H.; Feng, Z. Elevated NTCP expression by an iPSC-derived human hepatocyte maintenance medium enhances HBV infection in NTCP-reconstituted HepG2 cells. Cell Biosci. 2021, 11, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Li, W.; Urban, S. Entry of hepatitis B and hepatitis D virus into hepatocytes: Basic insights and clinical implications. J. Hepatol. 2016, 64, S32–S40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Liguori, M.J.; Blomme, E.A.; Waring, J.F. Trovafloxacin-Induced Gene Expression Changes in Liver-Derived In Vitro Systems: Comparison of Primary Human Hepatocytes to HepG2 Cells. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2008, 36, 223–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Coulouarn, C.; Factor, V.M.; Thorgeirsson, S.S. Loss of miR-122 Expression in Liver Cancer Correlates with Suppression of the Hepatic Phenotype and Gain of Metastatic Properties. Oncogene 2009, 28, 3526–3536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Song, Y.M.; Song, S.-O.; Jung, Y.-K.; Kang, E.-S.; Cha, B.S.; Lee, H.C.; Lee, B.-W. Dimethyl sulfoxide reduces hepatocellular lipid accumulation through autophagy induction. Autophagy 2012, 8, 1085–1097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Pal, R.; Mamidi, M.K.; Das, A.K.; Bhonde, R. Diverse effects of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) on the differentiation potential of human embryonic stem cells. Arch. Toxicol. 2012, 86, 651–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Verheijen, M.; Lienhard, M.; Schrooders, Y.; Clayton, O.; Nudischer, R.; Boerno, S.; Timmermann, B.; Selevsek, N.; Schlapbach, R.; Gmuender, H. DMSO induces drastic changes in human cellular processes and epigenetic landscape in vitro. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 4641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. König, A.; Yang, J.; Jo, E.; Park, K.H.P.; Kim, H.; Than, T.T.; Song, X.; Qi, X.; Dai, X.; Park, S. Efficient long-term amplification of hepatitis B virus isolates after infection of slow proliferating HepG2-NTCP cells. J. Hepatol. 2019, 71, 289–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Marlet, J.; Lier, C.; Roch, E.; Maugey, M.; Moreau, A.; Combe, B.; Lefeuvre, S.; d’Alteroche, L.; Barbereau, D.; Causse, X. Revisiting HBV resistance to entecavir with a phenotypic approach. Antivir. Res. 2020, 181, 104869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Chen, R.; Liu, Y.; Luo, D.; Si, L.; Huang, B.; Wang, J.; Li, X.; Cheng, F.; Xu, D.; Duan, C. Hepatitis B virus mutation pattern rtA181S+ T184I+ M204I may contribute to multidrug resistance in clinical practice: Analysis of a large cohort of Chinese patients. Antivir. Res. 2020, 180, 104852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Mokaya, J.; McNaughton, A.L.; Bester, P.A.; Goedhals, D.; Barnes, E.; Marsden, B.D.; Matthews, P.C. Hepatitis B virus resistance to tenofovir: Fact or fiction? A systematic literature review and structural analysis of drug resistance mechanisms. Wellcome Open Res. 2020, 5, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Lok, A.S.; Zoulim, F.; Dusheiko, G.; Ghany, M.G. Hepatitis B cure: From discovery to regulatory approval. Hepatology 2017, 66, 1296–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Dawson, P.A.; Lan, T.; Rao, A. Bile acid transporters. J. Lipid Res. 2009, 50, 2340–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Volz, T.; Allweiss, L.; Ben, M.M.; Warlich, M.; Lohse, A.W.; Pollok, J.M.; Alexandrov, A.; Urban, S.; Petersen, J.; Lütgehetmann, M.; et al. The entry inhibitor Myrcludex-B efficiently blocks intrahepatic virus spreading in humanized mice previously infected with hepatitis B virus. J. Hepatol. 2013, 58, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Blank, A.; Markert, C.; Hohmann, N.; Carls, A.; Mikus, G.; Lehr, T.; Alexandrov, A.; Haag, M.; Schwab, M.; Urban, S.; et al. Myrcludex B: A first-in-human clinical study with a first-in-class hepatitis B and hepatitis D virus entry inhibitor. J. Hepatol. 2016, 65, 483–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Lucifora, J.; Esser, K.; Protzer, U. Ezetimibe blocks hepatitis B virus infection after virus uptake into hepatocytes. Antivir. Res. 2013, 97, 195–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Shimura, S.; Watashi, K.; Fukano, K.; Peel, M.; Sluder, A.; Kawai, F.; Iwamoto, M.; Tsukuda, S.; Takeuchi, J.S.; Miyake, T. Cyclosporin derivatives inhibit hepatitis B virus entry without interfering with NTCP transporter activity. J. Hepatol. 2017, 66, 685–692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Wang, X.-j.; Hu, W.; Zhang, T.-y.; Mao, Y.-y.; Liu, N.-n.; Wang, S.-q. Irbesartan, an FDA approved drug for hypertension and diabetic nephropathy, is a potent inhibitor for hepatitis B virus entry by disturbing Na+-dependent taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide activity. Antivir. Res. 2015, 120, 140–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Passioura, T.; Watashi, K.; Fukano, K.; Shimura, S.; Saso, W.; Morishita, R.; Ogasawara, Y.; Tanaka, Y.; Mizokami, M.; Sureau, C. De novo macrocyclic peptide inhibitors of hepatitis B virus cellular entry. Cell Chem. Biol. 2018, 25, 906–915. e905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Huang, H.-C.; Tao, M.-H.; Hung, T.-M.; Chen, J.-C.; Lin, Z.-J.; Huang, C. (−)-Epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits entry of hepatitis B virus into hepatocytes. Antivir. Res. 2014, 111, 100–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Tsukamoto, Y.; Ikeda, S.; Uwai, K.; Taguchi, R.; Chayama, K.; Sakaguchi, T.; Narita, R.; Yao, W.-L.; Takeuchi, F.; Otakaki, Y. Rosmarinic acid is a novel inhibitor for Hepatitis B virus replication targeting viral epsilon RNA-polymerase interaction. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0197664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Jo, E.; Ryu, D.-K.; König, A.; Park, S.; Cho, Y.; Park, S.-H.; Kim, T.-H.; Yoon, S.K.; Ryu, W.-S.; Cechetto, J. Identification and characterization of a novel hepatitis B virus pregenomic RNA encapsidation inhibitor. Antivir. Res. 2020, 175, 104709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Bazzoli, C.; Jullien, V.; Tiec, C.L.; Rey, E.; Mentré, F.; Taburet, A.-M. Intracellular pharmacokinetics of antiretroviral drugs in HIV-infected patients, and their correlation with drug action. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2010, 49, 17–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Higashi-Kuwata, N.; Hayashi, S.; Kumamoto, H.; Ogata-Aoki, H.; Das, D.; Venzon, D.; Hattori, S.-i.; Bulut, H.; Hashimoto, M.; Otagiri, M. Identification of a novel long-acting 4’-modified nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor against HBV. J. Hepatol. 2021, 74, 1075–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Zhang, P.; Zhai, S.; Chang, J.; Guo, J.-T. In Vitro Anti-hepatitis B Virus Activity of 2′, 3′-Dideoxyguanosine. Virol. Sin. 2018, 33, 538–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Nakajima, S.; Watashi, K.; Fukano, K.; Tsukuda, S.; Wakae, K.; Aizaki, H.; Muramatsu, M.; Wakita, T.; Toyoda, T. Non-nucleoside hepatitis B virus polymerase inhibitors identified by an in vitro polymerase elongation assay. J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 55, 441–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Qiu, J.; Gong, Q.; Gao, J.; Chen, W.; Zhang, Y.; Gu, X.; Tang, D. Design, synthesis and evaluation of novel phenyl propionamide derivatives as non-nucleoside hepatitis B virus inhibitors. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018, 144, 424–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Parvez, M.K.; Rehman, M.T.; Alam, P.; Al-Dosari, M.S.; Alqasoumi, S.I.; Alajmi, M.F. Plant-derived antiviral drugs as novel hepatitis B virus inhibitors: Cell culture and molecular docking study. Saudi Pharm. J. 2019, 27, 389–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Ohsaki, E.; Ueda, K. Screening and evaluation of novel compounds against hepatitis B virus polymerase using highly purified reverse transcriptase domain. Viruses 2020, 12, 840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Wang, J.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Q.; Tian, C.; Zhang, Z.; Liu, J.; Wang, X. 2-Arylthio-5-iodo pyrimidine derivatives as non-nucleoside HBV polymerase inhibitors. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 2018, 26, 1573–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Himmel, D.M.; Maegley, K.A.; Pauly, T.A.; Bauman, J.D.; Das, K.; Dharia, C.; Clark, A.D.; Ryan, K.; Hickey, M.J.; Love, R.A. Structure of HIV-1 reverse transcriptase with the inhibitor β-thujaplicinol bound at the RNase H active site. Structure 2009, 17, 1625–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Fullagar, J.L.; Garner, A.L.; Struss, A.K.; Day, J.A.; Martin, D.P.; Yu, J.; Cai, X.; Janda, K.D.; Cohen, S.M. Antagonism of a zinc metalloprotease using a unique metal-chelating scaffold: Tropolones as inhibitors of P. aeruginosa elastase. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 3197–3199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Hirsch, D.R.; Cox, G.; D’Erasmo, M.P.; Shakya, T.; Meck, C.; Mohd, N.; Wright, G.D.; Murelli, R.P. Inhibition of the ANT (2″)-Ia resistance enzyme and rescue of aminoglycoside antibiotic activity by synthetic α-hydroxytropolones. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2014, 24, 4943–4947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Tavis, J.E.; Cheng, X.; Hu, Y.; Totten, M.; Cao, F.; Michailidis, E.; Aurora, R.; Meyers, M.J.; Jacobsen, E.J.; Parniak, M.A. The hepatitis B virus ribonuclease H is sensitive to inhibitors of the human immunodeficiency virus ribonuclease H and integrase enzymes. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Hu, Y.; Cheng, X.; Cao, F.; Huang, A.; Tavis, J.E. β-Thujaplicinol inhibits hepatitis B virus replication by blocking the viral ribonuclease H activity. Antivir. Res. 2013, 99, 221–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Lu, G.; Lomonosova, E.; Cheng, X.; Moran, E.A.; Meyers, M.J.; Le Grice, S.F.; Thomas, C.J.; Jiang, J.-k.; Meck, C.; Hirsch, D.R. Hydroxylated tropolones inhibit hepatitis B virus replication by blocking viral ribonuclease H activity. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 1070–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Huber, A.D.; Michailidis, E.; Tang, J.; Puray-Chavez, M.N.; Boftsi, M.; Wolf, J.J.; Boschert, K.N.; Sheridan, M.A.; Leslie, M.D.; Kirby, K.A. 3-Hydroxypyrimidine-2, 4-diones as novel hepatitis B virus antivirals targeting the viral ribonuclease H. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e00245-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Lomonosova, E.; Zlotnick, A.; Tavis, J.E. Synergistic interactions between hepatitis B virus RNase H antagonists and other inhibitors. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e02441-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Chauhan, R.; Li, Q.; Woodson, M.E.; Gasonoo, M.; Meyers, M.J.; Tavis, J.E. Efficient inhibition of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication and cccDNA formation by HBV ribonuclease H inhibitors during infection. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2021, 65, e0146021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Ledesma, F.C.; El Khamisy, S.F.; Zuma, M.C.; Osborn, K.; Caldecott, K.W. A human 5′-tyrosyl DNA phosphodiesterase that repairs topoisomerase-mediated DNA damage. Nature 2009, 461, 674–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Wang, Y.-X.; Niklasch, M.; Liu, T.; Wang, Y.; Shi, B.; Yuan, W.; Baumert, T.F.; Yuan, Z.; Tong, S.; Nassal, M. Interferon-inducible MX2 is a host restriction factor of hepatitis B virus replication. J. Hepatol. 2020, 72, 865–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Seo, H.W.; Seo, J.P.; Jung, G. Heat shock protein 70 and heat shock protein 90 synergistically increase hepatitis B viral capsid assembly. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018, 503, 2892–2898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Stahl, M.; Beck, J.r.; Nassal, M. Chaperones activate hepadnavirus reverse transcriptase by transiently exposing a C-proximal region in the terminal protein domain that contributes to ε RNA binding. J. Virol. 2007, 81, 13354–13364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Beck, J.; Nassal, M. Efficient Hsp90-independent in vitro activation by Hsc70 and Hsp40 of duck hepatitis B virus reverse transcriptase, an assumed Hsp90 client protein. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278, 36128–36138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Lubkowska, A.; Pluta, W.; Strońska, A.; Lalko, A. Role of heat shock proteins (HSP70 and HSP90) in viral infection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Yedavalli, V.S.; Neuveut, C.; Chi, Y.-h.; Kleiman, L.; Jeang, K.-T. Requirement of DDX3 DEAD box RNA helicase for HIV-1 Rev-RRE export function. Cell 2004, 119, 381–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Ogunnaike, M.; Das, S.; Raut, S.S.; Sultana, A.; Nayan, M.U.; Ganesan, M.; Edagwa, B.J.; Osna, N.A.; Poluektova, L.Y. Chronic hepatitis B infection: New approaches towards cure. Biomolecules 2023, 13, 1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Lam, A.M.; Dugyala, R.R.; Sheraz, M.; Liu, F.; Thi, E.P.; Graves, I.E.; Cuconati, A.; Steuer, H.M.; Ardzinski, A.; Overholt, N. Preclinical antiviral and safety profiling of the HBV RNA destabilizer AB-161. Viruses 2024, 16, 323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Berke, J.M.; Dehertogh, P.; Vergauwen, K.; Van Damme, E.; Mostmans, W.; Vandyck, K.; Pauwels, F. Capsid assembly modulators have a dual mechanism of action in primary human hepatocytes infected with hepatitis B virus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2017, 61, e00560-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Alonso, S.; Guerra, A.-R.; Carreira, L.; Ferrer, J.-Á.; Gutiérrez, M.-L.; Fernandez-Rodriguez, C.M. Upcoming pharmacological developments in chronic hepatitis B: Can we glimpse a cure on the horizon? BMC Gastroenterol. 2017, 17, 168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Allweiss, L.; Dandri, M. Experimental in vitro and in vivo models for the study of human hepatitis B virus infection. J. Hepatol. 2016, 64, S17–S31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Lucifora, J.; Xia, Y.; Reisinger, F.; Zhang, K.; Stadler, D.; Cheng, X.; Sprinzl, M.F.; Koppensteiner, H.; Makowska, Z.; Volz, T. Specific and nonhepatotoxic degradation of nuclear hepatitis B virus cccDNA. Science 2014, 343, 1221–1228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Krooss, S.A.; Dai, Z.; Schmidt, F.; Rovai, A.; Fakhiri, J.; Dhingra, A.; Yuan, Q.; Yang, T.; Balakrishnan, A.; Steinbrück, L.; et al. Ex Vivo/In vivo Gene Editing in Hepatocytes Using “All-in-One” CRISPR-Adeno-Associated Virus Vectors with a Self-Linearizing Repair Template. iScience 2020, 23, 100764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  207. Qi, Y.; Gao, Z.; Xu, G.; Peng, B.; Liu, C.; Yan, H.; Yao, Q.; Sun, G.; Liu, Y.; Tang, D. DNA polymerase κ is a key cellular factor for the formation of covalently closed circular DNA of hepatitis B virus. PLoS Pathog. 2016, 12, e1005893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Structural representation of infectious HBV virions. HBsAg S, M, and L surface proteins on the lipid envelope. The lipid envelope surrounds the nucleocapsid (containing a relaxed circular DNA (rcDNA) and the viral DNA polymerase. Created in BioRender. Xaba, L. (2025) https://BioRender.com/i0t9boo (accessed on 18 July 2025).
Figure 1. Structural representation of infectious HBV virions. HBsAg S, M, and L surface proteins on the lipid envelope. The lipid envelope surrounds the nucleocapsid (containing a relaxed circular DNA (rcDNA) and the viral DNA polymerase. Created in BioRender. Xaba, L. (2025) https://BioRender.com/i0t9boo (accessed on 18 July 2025).
Viruses 17 01057 g001
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) fate in HBV-infected PHH and HBV spread in HepG2-NTCP cells [57,58]. (A) Proliferation of HBV-infected hepatocytes results in the loss of cccDNA; this shows how individual cccDNA molecules are distributed during cell division [58]. Red-shaded squares represent cells infected with active HBV replication and cccDNA is represented by the infinity symbol (∞). (B) Schematic representation of experimental designs showing fate of HBV in two co-culture systems of HBV donor (red squared with green circles) and acceptor cells (white squares with white circles) in the presence of PEG [57]. Red squares with white circles are infected acceptor cells due to spread. PHH: primary human hepatocyte; NTCP: sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (adapted with permission from Professor Maura Dandri).
Figure 2. Schematic illustration of HBV covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) fate in HBV-infected PHH and HBV spread in HepG2-NTCP cells [57,58]. (A) Proliferation of HBV-infected hepatocytes results in the loss of cccDNA; this shows how individual cccDNA molecules are distributed during cell division [58]. Red-shaded squares represent cells infected with active HBV replication and cccDNA is represented by the infinity symbol (∞). (B) Schematic representation of experimental designs showing fate of HBV in two co-culture systems of HBV donor (red squared with green circles) and acceptor cells (white squares with white circles) in the presence of PEG [57]. Red squares with white circles are infected acceptor cells due to spread. PHH: primary human hepatocyte; NTCP: sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide (adapted with permission from Professor Maura Dandri).
Viruses 17 01057 g002
Figure 3. HBV cell culture systems in chronological order of development.
Figure 3. HBV cell culture systems in chronological order of development.
Viruses 17 01057 g003
Figure 4. Diagrammatic representation of HBV entry into HepG2-NTCP cells via NTCP. HBV interacts with the HSPG on the cell surface and binds to the specific receptor NTCP on the HepG2-NTCP cell, and then proceeds to enter the HepG2-NTCP cell. HSPG: heparan sulphate proteoglycan; NTCP: Na+-taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide; and cccDNA: covalently closed circular DNA [79]. Created in BioRender. Mthethwa, L. (2025) https://BioRender.com/r09j085 (accessed on 18 July 2025).
Figure 4. Diagrammatic representation of HBV entry into HepG2-NTCP cells via NTCP. HBV interacts with the HSPG on the cell surface and binds to the specific receptor NTCP on the HepG2-NTCP cell, and then proceeds to enter the HepG2-NTCP cell. HSPG: heparan sulphate proteoglycan; NTCP: Na+-taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide; and cccDNA: covalently closed circular DNA [79]. Created in BioRender. Mthethwa, L. (2025) https://BioRender.com/r09j085 (accessed on 18 July 2025).
Viruses 17 01057 g004
Figure 5. Diagrammatic representation showing where the inhibitors are acting in the replication cycle of HBV. Created in BioRender. Mthethwa, L. (2025) https://BioRender.com/r09j085 (accessed on 18 July 2025) and edited in Microsoft PowerPoint.
Figure 5. Diagrammatic representation showing where the inhibitors are acting in the replication cycle of HBV. Created in BioRender. Mthethwa, L. (2025) https://BioRender.com/r09j085 (accessed on 18 July 2025) and edited in Microsoft PowerPoint.
Viruses 17 01057 g005
Table 1. Summary of HBV in vitro hepatocyte culture models [79], highlighting advantages and limitations.
Table 1. Summary of HBV in vitro hepatocyte culture models [79], highlighting advantages and limitations.
Cell LineAdvantagesShortcomingsHBV Infection Rate and Application of the Models
HepG2.2.15 cellscccDNA accumulation. Continuous HBV gene expression and replication.Reduced viral replication. Unstable antigen expression.
Virion production from integrated DNA.
Antiviral compound screening and assessment, etc. [80].
HepAD38 (EF9 and EFS19) cellsThese cells differentiate rapidly and produce significant quantities of viral particles. Importantly, they also allow for the accumulation of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), a crucial aspect of the HBV life cycle.Virions are created from integrated DNA and represent an incomplete viral life cycle.The model is useful for studying HBV infection, cccDNA persistence, and exploring antiviral treatment strategies in a controlled lab setting. A possible source of virions produced from tissue culture [81].
Ad-HBV1.3-systemsNo species barrier.
Effective HBV expression.
Controllable HBV expression and mutation.
Direct measurement of the efficacy of transfection and infection (integrated green fluorescent protein gene).
Lacking the normal infection stage of HBV.Used to create acute hepatitis B infection models in animals [82].
HBV baculovirus systemEasy detection of riboprotein-bound
HBV DNA.
High HBV replication level.
Formation of infectious viruses and a detectable intracellular cccDNA pool.
Nonreceptor-mediated entry.
Gene transfer is restricted to certain species.
Missing HBV natural infection stage.
Quantify the effect of antiviral agents on nuclear HBV DNA.
Used for studying the resistance of HBV to
nucleoside analogues [83].
Primary human hepatocytes (PHH)Supports the full life cycle of HBV infections: Capable of replicating every stage of infection, from viral entry and replication to release.
Includes a variety of liver-specific host factors: These hepatocyte-specific components ensure that the model closely mimics the natural infection process in human liver cells.
Has a fully functional innate immune system: This feature allows the system to simulate the body’s initial immune response to the viral infections, facilitating the study of immune evasion and antiviral defenses.
Scarcity of high-quality donors and limited cell lifespan.
Varying degrees of susceptibility to HBV infections.
Loss of functional characteristics following plating.
Challenges in maintaining appropriate culture conditions.
Assessment of drug candidates’ toxicity, drug–drug interactions, drug transporter activity, and metabolism in vitro.
Human fetal hepatocytesPhenotypically and biologically functionally close to primary adult human hepatocytes.Low infection efficiency.
Short infection time.
Limited availability.
Large donor–donor variations.
HBV infection rate 12–90% [77,84].
Co-culturing with hepatic non-parenchymal cells and subsequent addition of 2%
DMSO leads to the formation of hepatocyte islands with prolonged phenotypic maintenance [85].
The early events in viral entry into cells as well as viral replication [86].
Adult human hepatocytesThe gold standard host cell to HBV infection experiments.
Closest to the physiological characteristics of hepatocytes in vivo.
Close to the natural process of infection.
Limited life cycle.
Unpassable culture.
Phenotypically unstable in vitro.
Rapidly lose permissiveness for HBV
Infection.
Large donor–donor variations.
HBV infection rate 20–100% [71,87].
Used for studying the process of HBV infection [62,87].
Used for studying apoptosis [71].
Preparation of 3D primary hepatocyte culture system for analyses of liver diseases, drug metabolism, and toxicity [75,88].
Co-culture systemTest the utility of various direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and putative host-targeting antivirals (HTAs).
Assessing preclinically the efficacy of other entry inhibitors and possibly (vaccine-induced) neutralizing antibodies.
Wide variability between donors in terms of HBV permissiveness.Inflammation and drug-induced hepatotoxicity [89].
Primary Tupaia hepatocytesThe only species susceptible to HBV infection besides humans and chimpanzees.Expensive.HBV infection rate > 70% [90].
Used for in vitro as well as in vivo infection
experiments [91].
HBV-specific receptor identification [92].
HepaRG cellsPreserve the specific functional properties of hepatocytes.
Support the complete HBV life cycle.
Produce HBV cccDNA.
Involved in liver functions.
Produces transcripts for a variety of nuclear receptors.
Strict culture conditions.
Exhibits low infection efficiency.
Requires cellular differentiation.
Limited ability for cell-to-cell transmission.
HBV infection rate < 30% [92,93].
HBV molecular mechanism and screening,
evaluation of anti-HBV drugs, cccDNA
spread, etc. [94].
Drug metabolism and toxicity [95,96].
In vitro systems based on induced
pluripotent stem (iPS) cell-derived
human hepatocytes
Exhibit characteristics closely resembling those of healthy liver cells capable of supporting the entire viral replication cycle.
Possess a fully functional immune response system.
Complex procedure.HBV infection rates can reach as high as 25% [97].
Screening for drug-induced hepatotoxicity [98].
The HBV virus’s life cycle and the damage it causes to the liver [99].
NTCP overexpressing hepatoma cell
lines
Supporting the full life cycle of a virus.
Flexibility and ease of use.
The cells exhibit low sensitivity to infection by HBV derived from serum.
Achieving infection requires a very high multiplicity of infection (MOI).
After infection occurs, there is minimal viral spread to other cells.
HBV infection rates can reach as high as 50% [100].
Screen antiviral drugs on a large scale, with a focus on targeting the NTCP receptor, which is essential for HBV entry into liver cells [81].
Huh7-NTCPEnhanced infection efficiency.Only partially replicate the behavior of normal hepatocytes due to inadequate polarization.
Lacks detectable levels of the receptor.
Useful for studies of the HBV virus.
HepG2-NTCPEasily accessible.
Consistent reproducibility.
Strong viral infection.
Incomplete mimicry of normal hepatocyte function.
Reduced viral replication and infection efficiency.
Necessitates additional use of PEG and DMSO for optimal results.
HBV studies.
In vitro evaluation of metabolism.
HepG2-NTCP sec+Complete HBV life cycle support.
Sustained viral propagation.
Requires a high viral titer for effective inoculation.
Needs PEG to enhance viral infectivity.
HBV studies.
In vitro evaluation of metabolism.
The 3D culturePreserves cell morphology.
No PEG or DMSO requirement.
Does not fully replicate the natural hepatic environment or maintain liver-specific functions.HBV studies.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sibiya, T.; Xaba, L.; Mthethwa, L.; Chuturgoon, A.A.; Msomi, N. The Evolution of Cell Culture Systems to Study Hepatitis B Virus Pathogenesis and Antiviral Susceptibility. Viruses 2025, 17, 1057. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17081057

AMA Style

Sibiya T, Xaba L, Mthethwa L, Chuturgoon AA, Msomi N. The Evolution of Cell Culture Systems to Study Hepatitis B Virus Pathogenesis and Antiviral Susceptibility. Viruses. 2025; 17(8):1057. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17081057

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sibiya, Thabani, Lunga Xaba, Lulama Mthethwa, Anil A. Chuturgoon, and Nokukhanya Msomi. 2025. "The Evolution of Cell Culture Systems to Study Hepatitis B Virus Pathogenesis and Antiviral Susceptibility" Viruses 17, no. 8: 1057. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17081057

APA Style

Sibiya, T., Xaba, L., Mthethwa, L., Chuturgoon, A. A., & Msomi, N. (2025). The Evolution of Cell Culture Systems to Study Hepatitis B Virus Pathogenesis and Antiviral Susceptibility. Viruses, 17(8), 1057. https://doi.org/10.3390/v17081057

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop