You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
MDPIMDPI
Search all articles
Viruses
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open Access

22 January 2024

Detection, Characterization and Sequencing of BTV Serotypes Circulating in Cuba in 2022

,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
National Center for Animal and Plant Health (CENSA), Carretera de Tapaste y Autopista Nacional, Apartado Postal 10, San José de las Lajas, San José de las Lajas 32700, Cuba
2
ANSES/INRAE/ENVA-UPEC, UMR 1161 Virology, Laboratoire de santé animale, 14 rue Pierre et Marie Curie, 94700 Maisons Alfort, France
3
Genomics Platform IdentyPath, Laboratory for Food Safety, ANSES, 94700 Maisons-Alfort, France
4
Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale dell’Abruzzo e del Molise, 64100 Teramo, Italy
Viruses2024, 16(1), 164;https://doi.org/10.3390/v16010164
This article belongs to the Special Issue Culicoides-Borne Viruses 2023
Version Notes
Order Reprints

Abstract

In Cuba, despite a high sero-prevalence of bluetongue virus (BTV), circulating serotypes remain unknown. The aim of this study was to identify circulating BTV serotypes in farms throughout the western region of Cuba. Blood samples were collected from 200 young cattle and sheep between May and July 2022 for virological analyses (PCR, viral isolation and virus neutralization) and genome sequencing. The results confirmed viral circulation, with viro-prevalence of 25% for BTV. The virus was isolated from 18 blood samples and twelve BTV serotypes were identified by sequencing RT-PCR products targeting the segment 2 of the BTV genome (BTV-1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 22 and 24). Finally, the full genome sequences of 17 Cuban BTV isolates were recovered using a Sequence Independent Single Primer Amplification (SISPA) approach combined to MinION Oxford Nanopore sequencing technology. All together, these results highlight the co-circulation of a wide diversity of BTV serotypes in a quite restricted area and emphasize the need for entomological and livestock surveillance, particularly in light of recent changes in the global distribution and nature of BTV infections.

1. Introduction

Bluetongue (BT) is an infectious, non-contagious disease caused by BTV which belongs to the Orbivirus genus of the Sedoreoviridae family [1]. This virus is transmitted by biting midges of the genus Culicoides (order Diptera, family Ceratopogonidae), mainly affecting domestic and wild ruminants [2].
BT is included on the WOAH list of notifiable diseases due to the rapid transmission and high dissemination of BTV, posing a risk of infection to various ruminant species [3]. The major negative impact of BTV infections lies in the economic losses due to international animal movement restrictions, as well as the disease prevention and control expenses affecting both individual farmers and the broader agricultural industry [4,5].
BTV has a genome of 10 double-stranded RNA segments (S) encoding 7 structural viral proteins (VP1 to VP7) and 6 non-structural proteins (NS1-NS4, NS3a and NS5) [6,7]. BTV has two capsid layers [8]: the outer capsid consists of VP2 and VP5, while VP7 and VP3 form the inner capsid which contains the viral genome and the replication complex (VP1, VP4 and VP6). VP2, the major constituent of the outer capsid, is exposed on the surface of the virus particle and determines the serotype-specific antigen.
Currently, 36 serotypes have been widely recognized [9,10,11,12,13]. The specific antigen (VP2) of each serotype induce the production of serotype-specific neutralizing antibodies.
Multiple serotypes have been identified in the Americas and Caribbean regions. Five BTV serotypes have been identified in North America, specifically BTV-10, 11, 13 and 17, while BTV-2 was restricted to the southeastern USA until 2010, when this serotype was reported in California [14]. Since 1998, 10 additional serotypes (BTV-1, 3, 5, 6, 9, 12, 14, 19, 22, 24), previously identified as exotic, have been isolated in the southeastern USA without being associated to any clinical cases [15,16,17]. In Central America and in the Caribbean islands, different BTV serotypes have been reported (serotypes 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 22 and 24), although clinical signs have rarely been described in ruminants in these tropical and subtropical zones [2,18,19]. In South America, BTV has been reported in Argentina (serotype 4), Brazil (serotypes 4, 6, 14, 17, 19 and 20), Colombia (serotypes 12, 14 and 17), Chile, Ecuador (serotypes 9, 13 and 18), French Guiana (serotypes 1, 2, 6, 10, 12, 13, 17 and 24), Guyana (serotypes 14 and 17), Peru, Suriname (serotypes 6, 14 and 17) and Venezuela [18,20,21,22].
In Cuba, although the presence of BTV has been reported to the World Organization for Animal Health (WOAH) since 2007 and a large number of serologically positive animals have been reported [23], there is no evidence of clinical manifestations following BTV infections and the serotype(s) circulating are still unknown.
The objective of the present study was to identify the circulating serotypes of BTV from blood samples of cattle and sheep from different farms in the western region of Cuba. In addition, we present here the sequencing of 17 genomes of BTV strains from Cuba, using a Sequence Independent Single Primer Amplification (SISPA) approach—a version allowing Orbivirus sequences enrichment—and the Oxford nanopore MinION sequencing technology.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Area

Cuba is located in an area where BT is considered as endemic. Cuba is an archipelago with an area of 109,884 km2. The north is bordered by the state of Florida (USA). The average temperature (between 24 and 26 °C) and relative humidity (>60%) are high. The rainy period (May to October) records about 80% of the total annual rainfall. Cuba has a total of fifteen provinces and 168 municipalities, including the municipality of Isla de la Juventud. In this study, we selected two provinces of the western region of Cuba (Havana and Mayabeque) and four of its municipalities (Guanabacoa, San José de las Lajas, Catalina de Güines and Jaruco) to collect bovine samples.

2.2. Sampling Frame

Two-hundred blood samples were collected between May and July 2022 in seven distinct farms from Havana and Mayabeque, provinces from the western region of Cuba (Figure 1). They were obtained from young cattle (n = 183) and sheep (n = 17) in tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for virological assays. Animals were healthy and without clinical signs. These blood samples were stored at 4 °C for 8 to 10 months. They were sent at room temperature to the laboratory for animal health (Maisons Alfort, France). It took two weeks for the samples to arrive in France.
Figure 1. Geographical location of animals sampled in Cuba between May and July 2022. Colored dots indicate the collection sites of the blood samples. The dot color determines the municipalities: in Habana Province—Guanabacoa (Vista Hermosa, represented by a yellow dot) and in Mayabeque Province—San José de las Lajas (CENSA and Guayabal, represented by a pink dot), Catalina de Güines (ICA, represented by orange dot), Jaruco (Tenería 1 Perú, Típica 14 Perú and Típica 4 Perú, represented by blue dot).

2.3. Molecular Analysis

2.3.1. Nucleic Acid Sample Preparation

Total RNA was extracted from 100 µL of blood or cell culture supernatant using the Kingfisher 96 robot and the ID Gene™ Mag Universal Extraction Kit (Innovative Diagnostics, Grabels, France) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Finally, the RNAs were eluted with 80 µL of ultrapure water and used for BTV reverse-transcription polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR).

2.3.2. BTV Group-Specific Real-Time RT-PCR

Five µL of RNA denatured at 95 °C during 3 min were added to a commercial real-time RT-PCR (rtRT-PCR) kit mix (ADI-352, Bio-X Diagnostics S.A., Ploufragan, France) according to manufacturer’s instructions. This kit allowed all BTV serotypes to be detected, by amplification of a portion of the BTV S10 encoding NS3.

2.4. Virus Isolation

Viral isolations were first carried out on cultured Culicoides cells (KC cells) [24], then in the event of failure, blood was inoculated into embryonated eggs. Insect cells or eggs were inoculated with a 10−1 dilution of washed and lysed blood. However, when the hematite pellet (after washing the EDTA bloods) was tiny, the EDTA blood sample was simply inoculated diluted to the tenth.

2.4.1. On KC Cells

A confluent monolayer of Culicoides sonorensis larvae cells (KC cells) was inoculated with diluted or lysed blood samples [24]. Inoculated flasks were incubated at 28 °C for 7 days. One hundred µL of culture cell supernatant was analyzed by BTV rtRT-PCR. If the cycle threshold (Ct) value was >30, a second passage was carried out. If the CT was <30, the cells/supernatants were inoculated to BSR cells following the protocol described in Section 2.4.3.

2.4.2. On Embryonated Chicken Eggs

Groups of three embryonated chicken eggs (ECE) were each intravenously inoculated with 0.1–0.2 mL of diluted or lysed BTV RT-PCR-positive blood samples [25]. The eggs were incubated until 7 days at 35 °C and examined daily. The embryos that died between days 2 and 7 were removed and homogenized. The tissue homogenates were then clarified by centrifugation at 2000× g for 10 min at 4 °C and 100 µL of the supernatant was tested by RT-PCR.

2.4.3. On BSR Cells

Positive RT-PCR supernatants from KC or homogenized embryonated eggs were inoculated into BSR cells. Inoculated flasks were incubated at 37 °C and examined under a microscope every day for 7 days to check for cytopathic effects (CPE).

2.5. BTV Serotyping Using Subgroup-Specific RT-PCR and Sanger Sequencing

BTV serotypes of the eighteen Cuban strains successfully isolated were then determined using conventional RT-PCR and Sanger sequencing of the genomic S2. Eight primer pairs, designed to specifically target the different BTV nucleotypes forming by the clustering of the S2 sequences of the 24 classic BTV serotypes, were used in conventional RT-PCR using the one-step RT-PCR Kit (Qiagen, France) as already described [21,26]. Five microliters of each RT-PCR products was analyzed by electrophoresis on a 1.5% agarose gel and directly sequenced in both directions, using the primer pairs used for amplification (Eurofins Genomics, Ebersberg, Germany). Sanger sequencing results were assembled using Geneious Prime (version 2022.0.2) and compared to the homologous sequences available in GenBank using the online BLAST search tool.

2.6. Virus Neutralization Test

Virus neutralization test (VNT) was carried out using methods similar to those described in the WOAH Manual of Standards for Diagnosis tests and vaccines [27]. Constant amounts of each BTV type-specific antiserum (50 µL/well) were added in microtiter plates to a tenfold dilution series of each virus sample (50 µL/well) and the serum–virus mixtures incubated for 1 h at 37 °C. BSR cells (100 µL/well), diluted in Eagle’s MEM, supplemented with 10% of fetal calf serum, 100 µg/µL streptomycin and 100 IU/mL penicillin, were then added at a concentration of 105 cells/mL. Microtiter plates were sealed and incubated at 37 °C for 7 days. The BTV type-specific antiserum that reduced the virus titre by at least two log10 compared with the virus control in the absence of any antiserum designated the virus serotype.

2.7. Minion Sequencing

The 17 Cuban strains of BTV isolated on BSR cells or embryonated chicken eggs were sequenced using a SISPA approach [28,29] adapted to orbiviruses sequencing and the Oxford Nanopore MinION technology.

2.7.1. RNA Extraction and Validation

Total RNA was extracted from 140 µL of cell culture virus using a QIAamp Viral RNA Mini Kit and QIACube automat (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions (without addition of RNA carrier). Extracted RNA was eluted into 60 μL of nuclease-free water and 5 µL of RNA (denatured 95 °C; 3 min) was analyzed using a commercial pan-BTV kit as described below (ADI-352, Bio-X Diagnostics, Ploufragan, France).

2.7.2. cDNA Synthesis and Amplification Using the SISPA Approach

First, overrepresented rRNA from the host were depleted using the NEBNext® rRNA Depletion Kit with RNA Sample Purification Beads (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Then, ds cDNAs were produced and amplified using a SISPA approach; a combination of random-tagged primers (FR26RV-N; 50 mM), and specific-tagged primers (FR-BT_F; 10 mM and FR-BT_R; 10 mM) targeting the conserved extremities of the ten orbiviruses genomic segments (see Table 1). Briefly, ds RNA samples were denatured at 95 °C during 5 min and set at 4 °C for 3 min. Then, RNAs were reverse transcribed into cDNA with Transcriptase inverse SuperScript™ IV Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Second-strand synthesis (SSB) of the cDNA was performed by adding 1 µL (5 U) of polymerase, Klenow Fragment (3′→5′ exo-,) (New England Biolabs, USA), at 37 °C, 60 min and 10 min at 75 °C. A tenfold dilution of the ds cDNA was then amplified using the FR20_Rv primer targeting the SISPA tag (see Table 1) and the Q5® Hot Start High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (New England Biolabs, USA) as recommended. Produced amplicons were purified using HighPrep PCR Clean-up System (MagBio Genomics Inc., Gaithersburg, MD, USA) and eluted in 30 µL of DNase free water. Finally, total ds cDNA was quantified with the dsDNA High Sensitivity (HS) assay Kit and Orbivirus ds cDNA checked using BTV specific rtRT-PCR (without the RT step). The quality and the average size of the amplicon sample was assessed using a TapeStation 2200 system (Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and the Genomic DNA ScreenTape kit (Agilent Technologies, USA).
Table 1. Primers used for cDNA synthesis and amplification.

2.7.3. Sequencing Using Oxford Nanopore Technology

Sequencing libraries were prepared using the SQK-LSK109 Kit and EXP-NBD104 or EXP-NBD114 Native Barcode expansion (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, UK) following the ligation sequencing amplicons protocol with native barcoding available on the manufacturer website (version “NBE_9065_v109_revAP_14Aug2019”). Fifty fmoles of final pooled library were loaded onto a FLO-MIN106 R9.4.1 flow cell (ONT). A 72 h run was conducted with standard settings and the MinKNOW software (version 22.12.7).

2.8. Sequences Data Analysis

2.8.1. Sequencing Data Analysis

Raw reads were basecalled and demultiplexed using GUPPY (version 6.4.6) and the highly accurate model. Then, reads were analyzed using a custom mapping workflow on Geneious Prime (version 2022.0.2). First, SISPA labels were removed from the read sequences (20 bases removed in 5′ and 3′ of each read), size selection was applied in order to select reads with expected length (between 150 and 9000 bp). Trimmed and filtered reads were then mapped on reference sequences using minimap2 (kmer length of 10) selected according to BTV serotype and geographic origin (BTV-1: OP185814 to OP185823; BTV-2: OP185734–OP185743; BTV-3: MT815674–MT815683; BTV-10: MZ395202–MZ395211; BTV-12: OP185744–OP185753; BTV-13: KY049872–KY049880 and KX442584; BTV-17: OR611816–OR611825; BTV-18: KY049881–KY049889 and KX442585; BTV-19: MT815694–MT815703; BTV-22: OP185864–OP185873; BTV-24: OP185764–OP185773). Consensus sequences were produced with a minimum of 100 of sequencing depth. In a few cases, if the mapping quality allowed it, the minimum of sequencing depth was lowered to recover the conserved segment extremities. Genomes were annotated and deposited in GenBank (see Section 3.4 for accession number).

2.8.2. Phylogenetic Analyses

The identification of the closest nucleotide homology available in GenBank nt database was performed for each genomic segment using the online BLAST search tool. Alignment and phylogenetic analysis were performed using MEGA X (version 10.2.0) [32]. Alignments were achieved using MUSCLE [33], and phylogenetic trees reconstructed using the Maximum Likelihood method and Tamura–Nei model, with a bootstrap of 1000 [34]. The trees were drawn to scale, with branch lengths established by measuring in the number of substitutions per site. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. Further information is provided in the figure legends.

3. Results

3.1. Pan-BTV Real-Time RT-PCR Analyses

A total of 50 out of 200 (25%) blood samples tested in this study were found positive for BTV using the pan-BTV RT-qPCR system, with Ct values ranging from 22 to 38. Among the positive blood samples, 45 were collected from bovine and five from sheep.

3.2. Viral Isolation

Forty-three blood samples were selected for viral isolation (BTV-positive blood samples with Ct values inferior to 33), and 18 BTV isolates were obtained. Thirteen were obtained with KC cells and five with embryonated chicken eggs (Table 2).
Table 2. BTV serotypes identified in Mayabeque and Havana provinces.

3.3. Serotype Determination

The serotypes of the 18 BTV isolates were determined by conventional RT-PCR, using subgroup-specific primers, and Sanger sequencing of the PCR products. The partial S2 sequences obtained were identified by alignment with sequences available in GenBank. A total of 12 BTV serotypes were identified (BTV-1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 22 and 24) (Table 2). Almost all isolates corresponded to mono-infection, but one sample was found co-infected by BTV-6 and 22. Serotype identification was also confirmed by the VNT analysis, except for the co-infected strain for which VNT was not possible.

3.4. Full Genome Sequencing

The genome of the 17 mono-infected BTV isolates were fully recovered using the SISPA-MinION sequencing approach described in this study, including the genome of one BTV-2, 3, 13, 19, 22 and 24 strain, two BTV-1, 10, 12 and 17 strains and three BTV-18 strains (Table 3).
Table 3. Corresponding accession numbers of the Cuban strain genomic sequences deposited on NCBI.

3.5. Phylogenetic Analysis of S2 (VP2) and S6 (VP5) of the Cuban BTV Strains

Sequences of S2 and S6, encoding the outer capsid proteins, were fully recovered and annotated. Closest homologies between the Cuban sequences and established sequences were determined using blastn algorithm and Genbank database (Table 4). S2 sequences recovered from Cuba displayed 95 to 98% of identity with published sequences from the western hemisphere, mostly sequences from USA and some others from French Guiana (Table 4). Similar homologies results were observed with the alignment of Cuban S6 sequences, except for serotype 3, which only displayed 93% of identity with a reference sequence from USA.
Table 4. First closest homology between theS2 and S6 sequences of the Cuban strains and sequences available in GenBank with 100% of sequence coverage (AN: accession number; Id%: percentage of nucleotide identity).
Finally, phylogenetic trees of S2 (Figure 2) and S6 (Figure 3) were built to analyze the phylogenetic relationship between the Cuban sequences and sequences in Genbank. We selected both closely related and more distant sequences from the eastern hemisphere to add some diversity.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analysis of S2 sequences of the Cuban BTV strains. Phylogenetic analysis of S2 sequences of BTV-1, 2, 3, 13, 18, 19 (A), 10, 12, 17, 22 and 24 (B) strains using the maximum likelihood method and Tamura–Nei model with 1000 bootstrap replicates in MEGA X. This analysis involved 39 (A) and 33 (B) nucleotide sequences, and there were a total of 2932 (A) and 2997 (B) positions in the final dataset. Bootstrap values appeared at the corresponding nodes. In the phylogenetic tree, accession number, serotype, country and year of sample collection are given. The Cuban sequences are marked in red. Brackets indicate nucleotypes clustering.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic analysis of S6 sequences of the Cuban BTV strains. Phylogenetic analysis of S6 sequences of BTV-1, 2, 3, 13, 18, 19 (A), 10, 12, 17, 22 and 24 (B) strains using the maximum likelihood method and Tamura–Nei model with 1000 bootstrap replicates in MEGA X. This analysis involved 51 (A) and 37 (B) nucleotide sequences, and there were a total of 1581 (A) and 1645 (B) positions in the final dataset. Bootstrap values appeared at the corresponding nodes. In the phylogenetic tree, accession number, serotype, country and year of sample collection are given. The Cuban sequences are marked in red. Brackets indicate nucleotypes clustering.
As expected, S2 sequences clustered according to the serotype of the BTV strains. Within each serotype, Cuban sequences clustered with sequences identified in the western hemisphere, including USA, Latin America and the Caribbean. As well, serotypes clustering followed the nucleotypes grouping [35,36].
The analysis of S6 sequences confirmed most of the previous observations. The majority of the sequences clustered according to nucleotypes and the serotypes.
Sequence homology research results on the seven other genomic segments (1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10) of the 18 BTV strains are available in the Supplementary Materials (Table S1), together with distance matrices and phylogenetic trees resulted from the alignments of the Cuban sequences for each segment (Figures S1–S8 and Table S2).

4. Discussion

Blood samples analyzed in this study were collected on asymptomatic animals from a quite small area including four municipalities in the province of Havana and Mayabeque. Yet, prevalence of BTV among our sampling reached 25% (50 PCR BTV positive blood samples out of 200 tested). Together with a previous work conducted 10 years ago that demonstrated 99.7% of BTV seropositivity among 1100 healthy bovines, our results strongly support the endemicity of BTV on the island [23]. Scant epidemiological data are available on BTV life cycle in the area; however, multiple parameters could explain the high prevalence of the virus, including the presence of the Culicoides vector, such as Culicoides insignis [15,37], the absence of vector control measures or BTV surveillance, and the asymptomatic circulation of the virus.
Eighteen Cuban BTV strains were successfully isolated from 43 blood samples (those with required viral load). This good yield of virus isolation highlights that despite the delay between sample collection and the analyses, in addition with the substandard storage conditions and transport, blood samples infectivity was not altered. Indeed, blood samples were stored for 6 to 8 months at +4 °C, and then at room temperature for around 3 weeks (including time spent in Havana and during air transport to France). Lysing and washing the blood before isolation on KC cells or eggs and then, in case of failure, inoculating EDTA blood diluted to the 10th, helped to the success of the viral isolation tests. Finally, as a last attempt, five more isolates were obtained on embryonated eggs.
This study is the first characterization of the BTV serotypes circulating on the island of Cuba. All isolates were serotyped using classical RT-PCRs and Sanger sequencing of the segment 2 and confirmed by VNT. Surprisingly, a total of twelve BTV serotypes (1, 2, 3, 6, 10, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 22 and 24) were identified, showing a high level of co-circulation of BTV strains in a very restricted area close to Havana, at least between May and July 2022. It would be very interesting to investigate other regions of Cuba to find out whether additional serotypes are circulating and if contrasted situation could be observed on the island. Serotypes identified in this study were also reported in different regions of the Americas such as the USA, Latin America and the Caribbean, including the Lesser Antilles, an area close to Cuba, suggesting a large distribution within the western hemisphere [2,14,18,21].
In this study, we also presented for the first time the recovery of BTV full genomes from Cuba using the combined approach of SISPA sample preparation and MinION sequencing. The twelve BTV serotypes were fully confirmed. Most of the S2 and S6 recovered from strains belonging to the same serotype shared very high nt homology (from 98.4 to 99.8%), forming the same phylogenetic cluster. In contrast, S2 of the two BTV-10 strains displayed only 93.6% of nt identity and each of the Cuban strains were more closely related to BTV-10 strains from French Guiana (94.9 and 95.7%), suggesting that two different BTV-10 are circulating in this region.
While S2 and S6 analysis are fundamental for orbiviruses serotyping, the recovery of the eight other segments offer the opportunity to obtain some insights into the relationships and dynamic of BTV strains. Alignments of the Cuban S1, S3, S4, S5, S7, S8, S9 and S10 displayed very different clustering patterns, all completely independent from the BTV serotypes identified, highlighting multiple reassortment phenomena between the different segments and strains (Supplementary Data). Interestingly, some segments displayed remarkable nucleotide diversity (below 96% of nt identity) but quite conserved protein sequences, such as VP7, with twelve isolates sharing a similar sequence (100% of aa identity), additionally to VP1 and VP3 displaying 98.5 to 100% and 99.4 to 100% of AA homology, respectively. The predominance of these protein sequences could suggest that they represent the best adaptation to their environment and hosts (insect or mammal) [38].
Finally, the closest homology and phylogenetic analysis of the Cuban BTV segments supported a common origin with the North American strain. Indeed, most of the S2 and S6 from Cuba shared 92.6 to 98.4% of nt identity with strains from the USA, and similar observations were made when analyzing the closest homology of the other segments (Supplementary Data Figures S1–S8 and Table S1). Particularly, homology research of the Cuban S9 even suggested recent exchanges in the area with closest homology implying American strains described in 2022 (Supplementary Data Table S1). Although database could influence at some extent such results, considering that the USA and France overseas department are the main sources of western BTV genomes submitted in Genbank, the geographical proximity of these two countries might explain the close phylogenetic relationship between the Cuban and the American strains. Bluetongue, like other vector-borne diseases, can be introduced into new regions through legal and illegal movements of susceptible hosts or through conveyance of the vector in vehicles or by the wind, or through the exchange of infected semen or embryos [39]. The proximity of Cuba to the southern region of the USA could be a possible route of exchange of BTV serotypes by windborne transportation of infected Culicoides [40]. The closest distance between Cuba and the USA is Key West, the main island of the Keys, located 90 miles (144 km) south of Florida. Even though the vectors that transmit BTV have a limited flight time, they can be easily transported over long distances by the wind [41], even as far as 700 km under certain climatologic conditions when wind speed is sufficient [42] and orographic barriers are absent [43,44].
Collectively, the results of this study underline the great BTV diversity circulating in Cuba where the virus seemed well established. More epidemiological studies are required to better understand BTV life cycle in those (sub)-tropical area, such as vectors and hosts involved, in both domesticated and wild life, BTV distribution and ways of exchange between the Caribbean islands and the Americas. To conclude, in addition to the importance of serotyping in disease surveillance and control, more efforts should be made in BTV genotypes characterization and genome sequencing to decipher BTV evolution and dynamic.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/v16010164/s1, Figures S1–S8: Phylogenetic analysis of the Cuban strains of BTV, segments 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9 and 10; Table S1: First closest homology between the genomic sequences of the Cuban strains and reference sequences available in GenBank with 100% of sequence coverage (AN: accession number of the recovered sequence; Id% and Cov% percentage of nucleotide identity and coverage between Cuban and reference sequences); Table S2: Distance matrices determined from the Cuban sequences alignment.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: A.M.A., C.S. and E.B.; writing—original draft preparation: M.C. and L.P.; writing—review and editing: A.M.A., M.G., E.B., S.Z., F.V., M.-L.T., M.T., G.S., A.L., C.L.P., C.D., Y.O., D.V., P.D., M.M. and C.S.; supervision: A.M.A., C.S. and E.B.; Investigation M.C., A.M.A., L.P., M.G. and M.T.; Data curation and Software: M.G., F.V. and M.-L.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded in the frame of the FSPI project (Fonds de solidarité pour les projects innovants) VectoCaribe from the Embassy of France in Cuba. The Minion sequencing was partially funded by PREPMEDVET, grant number ANR-20-SEBM-0004 and by the Blue-Med project (PRIMA program, an Art.185 initiative supported and funded under European Union Horizon 2020).

Institutional Review Board Statement

No ethical approval was required. All samples were taken by qualified veterinarians.

Data Availability Statement

All data presented in this study are summarized in the paper. The detailed data of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank the veterinarians of the farms for their help in the field work and all the staff of the UMR 1161 Virologie for the results obtained in this research.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses. Available online: https://ictv.global/report/chapter/sedoreoviridae/sedoreoviridae/orbivirus (accessed on 8 November 2022).
  2. Walton, T.E. The history of bluetongue and a current global overview. Vet. Ital. 2004, 40, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. WOAH-Listed Diseases. Available online: https://www.woah.org/en/what-we-do/animal-health-and-welfare/animal-diseases/ (accessed on 6 August 2021).
  4. Acevedo, A.M.; Hinojosa, Y.; Relova, D.; Perera, C.L. Bluetongue virus: A known virus, a current threat. Rev. Salud Anim. 2016, 38, 52–59. [Google Scholar]
  5. Zientara, S.; Sanchez-Vizcaino, J.M. Control of bluetongue in Europe. Vet. Microbiol. 2013, 165, 33–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mertens, P.P.; Brown, F.; Sangar, D.V. Assignment of the genome segments of bluetongue virus type 1 to the proteins which they encode. Virology 1984, 135, 207–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mohd Jaafar, F.; Attoui, H.; Bahar, M.W.; Siebold, C.; Sutton, G.; Mertens, P.P.; De Micco, P.; Stuart, D.I.; Grimes, J.M.; De Lamballerie, X. The structure and function of the outer coat protein VP9 of Banna virus. Structure 2005, 13, 17–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Roy, P. Bluetongue Virus Proteins And Particles And Their Role In Virus Entry, Assembly, And Release. Adv. Virus Res. 2005, 64, 69–123. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bumbarov, V.; Golender, N.; Erster, O.; Khinich, Y. Detection and isolation of Bluetongue virus from commercial vaccine batches. Vaccine 2016, 34, 3317–3323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jenckel, M.; Breard, E.; Schulz, C.; Sailleau, C.; Viarouge, C.; Hoffmann, B.; Hoper, D.; Beer, M.; Zientara, S. Complete coding genome sequence of putative novel bluetongue virus serotype 27. Genome Announc. 2015, 3, 10–1128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Maan, S.; Maan, N.S.; Belaganahalli, M.N.; Rao, P.P.; Singh, K.P.; Hemadri, D.; Putty, K.; Kumar, A.; Batra, K.; Krishnajyothi, Y.; et al. Full-Genome Sequencing as a Basis for Molecular Epidemiology Studies of Bluetongue Virus in India. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0131257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ries, C.; Vogtlin, A.; Hussy, D.; Jandt, T.; Gobet, H.; Hilbe, M.; Burgener, C.; Schweizer, L.; Hafliger-Speiser, S.; Beer, M.; et al. Putative Novel Atypical BTV Serotype ‘36’ Identified in Small Ruminants in Switzerland. Viruses 2021, 13, 721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sun, E.C.; Huang, L.P.; Xu, Q.Y.; Wang, H.X.; Xue, X.M.; Lu, P.; Li, W.J.; Liu, W.; Bu, Z.G.; Wu, D.L. Emergence of a Novel Bluetongue Virus Serotype, China 2014. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2016, 63, 585–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Maclachlan, N.J.; Wilson, W.C.; Crossley, B.M.; Mayo, C.E.; Jasperson, D.C.; Breitmeyer, R.E.; Whiteford, A.M. Novel serotype of bluetongue virus, Western North America. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 665–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Maclachlan, N.J.; Guthrie, A.J. Re-emergence of bluetongue, African horse sickness, and other orbivirus diseases. Vet. Res. 2010, 41, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mayo, C.; McDermott, E.; Kopanke, J.; Stenglein, M.; Lee, J.; Mathiason, C.; Carpenter, M.; Reed, K.; Perkins, T.A. Ecological Dynamics Impacting Bluetongue Virus Transmission in North America. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Rivera, N.A.; Varga, C.; Ruder, M.G.; Dorak, S.J.; Roca, A.L.; Novakofski, J.E.; Mateus-Pinilla, N.E. Bluetongue and Epizootic Hemorrhagic Disease in the United States of America at the Wildlife-Livestock Interface. Pathogens 2021, 10, 915. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Lager, I.A. Bluetongue virus in South America: Overview of viruses, vectors, surveillance and unique features. Vet. Ital. 2004, 40, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. MacLachlan, N.J.; Zientara, S.; Stallknecht, D.E.; Boone, J.D.; Goekjian, V.H.; Sailleau, C.; Balasuriya, U.B. Phylogenetic comparison of the S10 genes of recent isolates of bluetongue virus from the United States and French Martinique Island. Virus Res. 2007, 129, 236–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Homan, E.J.; Taylor, W.P.; de Ruiz, H.L.; Yuill, T.M. Bluetongue virus and epizootic haemorrhagic disease of deer virus serotypes in northern Colombian cattle. J. Hyg. 1985, 95, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Viarouge, C.; Lancelot, R.; Rives, G.; Breard, E.; Miller, M.; Baudrimont, X.; Doceul, V.; Vitour, D.; Zientara, S.; Sailleau, C. Identification of bluetongue virus and epizootic hemorrhagic disease virus serotypes in French Guiana in 2011 and 2012. Vet. Microbiol. 2014, 174, 78–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Legisa, D.M.; Gonzalez, F.N.; Dus Santos, M.J. Bluetongue virus in South America, Central America and the Caribbean. Virus Res. 2014, 182, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Martínez, N.; Alfonso, A.; Barrera, M. Primer reporte de bovinos seroreactores al virus de la lengua azul en Cuba. Rev. Salud Anim. 2011, 33, 131–133. [Google Scholar]
  24. Wechsler, S.J.; McHolland, L.E.; Tabachnick, W.J. Cell lines from Culicoides variipennis (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) support replication of bluetongue virus. J. Invertebr. Pathol. 1989, 54, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Clavijo, A.; Heckert, R.A.; Dulac, G.C.; Afshar, A. Isolation and identification of bluetongue virus. J. Virol. Methods 2000, 87, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Maan, N.S.; Maan, S.; Belaganahalli, M.N.; Ostlund, E.N.; Johnson, D.J.; Nomikou, K.; Mertens, P.P. Identification and differentiation of the twenty six bluetongue virus serotypes by RT-PCR amplification of the serotype-specific genome segment 2. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e32601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. WOAH. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals 2021; WOAH: Paris, France, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chrzastek, K.; Lee, D.H.; Smith, D.; Sharma, P.; Suarez, D.L.; Pantin-Jackwood, M.; Kapczynski, D.R. Use of Sequence-Independent, Single-Primer-Amplification (SISPA) for rapid detection, identification, and characterization of avian RNA viruses. Virology 2017, 509, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Djikeng, A.; Halpin, R.; Kuzmickas, R.; Depasse, J.; Feldblyum, J.; Sengamalay, N.; Afonso, C.; Zhang, X.; Anderson, N.G.; Ghedin, E.; et al. Viral genome sequencing by random priming methods. BMC Genom. 2008, 9, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Peserico, A.; Marcacci, M.; Malatesta, D.; Di Domenico, M.; Pratelli, A.; Mangone, I.; D’Alterio, N.; Pizzurro, F.; Cirone, F.; Zaccaria, G.; et al. Diagnosis and characterization of canine distemper virus through sequencing by MinION nanopore technology. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 1714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sghaier, S.; Sailleau, C.; Marcacci, M.; Thabet, S.; Curini, V.; Ben Hassine, T.; Teodori, L.; Portanti, O.; Hammami, S.; Jurisic, L.; et al. Epizootic Haemorrhagic Disease Virus Serotype 8 in Tunisia, 2021. Viruses 2023, 15, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kumar, S.; Stecher, G.; Li, M.; Knyaz, C.; Tamura, K. MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across Computing Platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2018, 35, 1547–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Edgar, R.C. MUSCLE: Multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004, 32, 1792–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Tamura, K.; Nei, M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1993, 10, 512–526. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Maan, S.; Maan, N.S.; Nomikou, K.; Veronesi, E.; Bachanek-Bankowska, K.; Belaganahalli, M.N.; Attoui, H.; Mertens, P.P. Complete genome characterisation of a novel 26th bluetongue virus serotype from Kuwait. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e26147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Maan, S.; Maan, N.S.; Samuel, A.R.; Rao, S.; Attoui, H.; Mertens, P.P.C. Analysis and phylogenetic comparisons of full-length VP2 genes of the 24 bluetongue virus serotypes. J. Gen. Virol. 2007, 88 Pt 2, 621–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Garcia, A. Insectos hematófagos de Cuba. Poeyana Inst. Zool. Acad. Cienc. Cuba. 1976, 154, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  38. McDonald, S.M.; Nelson, M.I.; Turner, P.E.; Patton, J.T. Reassortment in segmented RNA viruses: Mechanisms and outcomes. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 448–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Mintiens, K.; Meroc, E.; Mellor, P.S.; Staubach, C.; Gerbier, G.; Elbers, A.R.; Hendrickx, G.; De Clercq, K. Possible routes of introduction of bluetongue virus serotype 8 into the epicentre of the 2006 epidemic in north-western Europe. Prev. Vet. Med. 2008, 87, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Aguilar-Vega, C.; Fernandez-Carrion, E.; Sanchez-Vizcaino, J.M. The possible route of introduction of bluetongue virus serotype 3 into Sicily by windborne transportation of infected Culicoides spp. Transbound. Emerg. Dis. 2019, 66, 1665–1673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Reynolds, D.R.; Chapman, J.W.; Harrington, R. The migration of insect vectors of plant and animal viruses. Adv. Virus Res. 2006, 67, 453–517. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sellers, R.F.; Maarouf, A.R. Possible introduction of epizootic hemorrhagic disease of deer virus (serotype 2) and bluetongue virus (serotype 11) into British Columbia in 1987 and 1988 by infected Culicoides carried on the wind. Can. J. Vet. Res. 1991, 55, 367–370. [Google Scholar]
  43. Bishop, A.L.; Spohr, L.J.; Barchia, I.M. Effects of altitude, distance and waves of movement on the dispersal in Australia of the arbovirus vector, Culicoides brevitarsis Kieffer (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). Prev. Vet. Med. 2004, 65, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Hendrickx, G.; Gilbert, M.; Staubach, C.; Elbers, A.; Mintiens, K.; Gerbier, G.; Ducheyne, E. A wind density model to quantify the airborne spread of Culicoides species during north-western Europe bluetongue epidemic, 2006. Prev. Vet. Med. 2008, 87, 162–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Download PDF
The Chinese Hamster Ovary Cell-Based H9 HA Subunit Avian Influenza Vaccine Provides Complete Protection against the H9N2 Virus Challenge in Chickens
Previous
The Inovirus Pf4 Triggers Antiviral Responses and Disrupts the Proliferation of Airway Basal Epithelial Cells
Next