Next Article in Journal
Lessons from Research for Sustainable Development and Conservation in Borneo
Next Article in Special Issue
Using REDD+ Policy to Facilitate Climate Adaptation at the Local Level: Synergies and Challenges in Vietnam
Previous Article in Journal
Foliage Chemistry of Pinus baksiana in the Athabasca Oil Sands Region, Alberta, Canada
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transforming Justice in REDD+ through a Politics of Difference Approach
Open AccessArticle

A Dominant Voice amidst Not Enough People: Analysing the Legitimacy of Mexico’s REDD+ Readiness Process

Institute of Environmental Science and Technology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain
Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ICREA), Pg. Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain
Instituto de Ecología, A. C., Red de Ecología Funcional, Carretera Antigua a Coatepec 351, El Haya, 91070 Xalapa, Mexico
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Damian C. Adams and Timothy A. Martin
Forests 2016, 7(12), 313;
Received: 28 September 2016 / Revised: 11 November 2016 / Accepted: 30 November 2016 / Published: 10 December 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue REDD+ Crossroads Post Paris: Politics, Lessons and Interplays)
In the development of national governance systems for Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest Degradation (REDD+), countries struggle with ensuring that decision-making processes include a variety of actors (i.e., input legitimacy) and represent their diverse views in REDD+ policy documents (i.e., output legitimacy). We examine these two dimensions of legitimacy using Mexico’s REDD+ readiness process during a four-year period (2011–2014) as a case study. To identify REDD+ actors and how they participate in decision-making we used a stakeholder analysis; to assess actors’ views and the extent to which these views are included in the country’s official REDD+ documents we conducted a discourse analysis. We found low level of input legitimacy in so far as that the federal government environment agencies concentrate most decision-making power and key land-use sectors and local people’s representatives are absent in decision-making forums. We also observed that the REDD+ discourse held by government agencies and both multilateral and international conservation organisations is dominant in policy documents, while the other two identified discourses, predominantly supported by national and civil society organisations and the academia, are partly, or not at all, reflected in such documents. We argue that Mexico’s REDD+ readiness process should become more inclusive, decentralised, and better coordinated to allow for the deliberation and institutionalisation of different actors’ ideas in REDD+ design. Our analysis and recommendations are relevant to other countries in the global South embarking on REDD+ design and implementation. View Full-Text
Keywords: discourses; legitimacy; Mexico; REDD+; stakeholder analysis discourses; legitimacy; Mexico; REDD+; stakeholder analysis
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Špirić, J.; Corbera, E.; Reyes-García, V.; Porter-Bolland, L. A Dominant Voice amidst Not Enough People: Analysing the Legitimacy of Mexico’s REDD+ Readiness Process. Forests 2016, 7, 313.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Search more from Scilit
Back to TopTop