Next Article in Journal
Metabolomic Investigations Reveal Properties of Natural Low-Temperature Adaptation Strategies in Five Evergreen Trees
Previous Article in Journal
Separating Biomass Gains and Losses of Planted Forest and Natural Forest and Their Contributions to Forest Biomass Carbon Storage in China for 2005–2020
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Structure and Regeneration Differentiation of Coniferous Stand Groups in Representative Altay Montane Forests: Demographic Evidence from Dominant Boreal Conifers

1
State Key Laboratory of Ecological Safety and Sustainable Development in Arid Lands, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
2
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
3
College of Geography and Remote Sensing Sciences, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China
4
Faculty of Earth Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, 41-200 Sosnowiec, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2025, 16(6), 885; https://doi.org/10.3390/f16060885 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 10 March 2025 / Revised: 19 May 2025 / Accepted: 22 May 2025 / Published: 23 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Ecology and Management)

Abstract

With the intensification of global climate change and human activities, coniferous species as the main components of natural forests in the Altay Mountains are facing the challenges of aging and regeneration. This study systematically analyzed structural heterogeneity and regeneration of three coniferous stand groups, Larix sibirica Ledeb. stand group, Abies sibirica Ledeb.-Picea obovata Ledeb.-Larix sibirica mixed stand group, and Picea obovata stand group, respectively, across western, central, and eastern forest areas of the Altay Mountains in Northwest China based on field surveys in 2023. Methodologically, we integrated Kruskal–Wallis/Dunn’s post hoc tests, nonlinear power-law modeling (diameter at breast height (DBH)–age relationships, validated via R2, root mean square error (RMSE), and F-tests), static life tables (age class mortality and survival curves), and dynamic indices. Key findings revealed structural divergence: the L. sibirica stand group exhibited dominance of large-diameter trees (>30 cm DBH) with sparse seedlings/saplings and limited regeneration; the mixed stand group was dominated by small DBH individuals (<10 cm), showing young age structures and vigorous regeneration; while the P. obovata stand group displayed uniform DBH/height distributions and slow regeneration capacity. Radial growth rates differed significantly—highest in the mixed stand group (average of 0.315 cm/a), intermediate in the P. obovata stand group (0.216 cm/a), and lowest in the L. sibirica stand group (0.180 cm/a). Age–density trends varied among stand groups: unimodal in the L. sibirica and P. obovata stand groups while declining in the mixed stand group. All stand groups followed a Deevey-II survival curve (constant mortality across ages). The mixed stand group showed the highest growth potential but maximum disturbance risk, the L. sibirica stand group exhibited complex variation with lowest risk probability, while the P. obovata stand group had weaker adaptive capacity. These results underscore the need for differentiated management: promoting L. sibirica regeneration via gap-based interventions, enhancing disturbance resistance in the mixed stand group through structural diversification, and prioritizing P. obovata conservation to maintain ecosystem stability. This multi-method framework bridges stand-scale heterogeneity with demographic mechanisms, offering actionable insights for climate-resilient forestry.
Keywords: Larix sibirica Ledeb.; Picea obovata Ledeb.; Abies sibirica Ledeb.; radial growth; static life table; dynamic index; survival curve Larix sibirica Ledeb.; Picea obovata Ledeb.; Abies sibirica Ledeb.; radial growth; static life table; dynamic index; survival curve

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, H.; Yu, Y.; Sun, L.; Li, C.; He, J.; Malik, I.; Wistuba, M.; Yu, R. Structure and Regeneration Differentiation of Coniferous Stand Groups in Representative Altay Montane Forests: Demographic Evidence from Dominant Boreal Conifers. Forests 2025, 16, 885. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16060885

AMA Style

Zhang H, Yu Y, Sun L, Li C, He J, Malik I, Wistuba M, Yu R. Structure and Regeneration Differentiation of Coniferous Stand Groups in Representative Altay Montane Forests: Demographic Evidence from Dominant Boreal Conifers. Forests. 2025; 16(6):885. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16060885

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Haiyan, Yang Yu, Lingxiao Sun, Chunlan Li, Jing He, Ireneusz Malik, Malgorzata Wistuba, and Ruide Yu. 2025. "Structure and Regeneration Differentiation of Coniferous Stand Groups in Representative Altay Montane Forests: Demographic Evidence from Dominant Boreal Conifers" Forests 16, no. 6: 885. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16060885

APA Style

Zhang, H., Yu, Y., Sun, L., Li, C., He, J., Malik, I., Wistuba, M., & Yu, R. (2025). Structure and Regeneration Differentiation of Coniferous Stand Groups in Representative Altay Montane Forests: Demographic Evidence from Dominant Boreal Conifers. Forests, 16(6), 885. https://doi.org/10.3390/f16060885

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop