Next Article in Journal
Fusion Approaches to Individual Tree Species Classification Using Multisource Remote Sensing Data
Previous Article in Journal
Soil Bacteria and Soil Fungi Respond Differently to the Changes in Aboveground Plants along Slope Aspect in a Subalpine Coniferous Forest
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Input–Output Analysis of China’s Forest Industry Chain

1
College of Forestry, College of Arts and Design, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2
Co-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
3
School of Statistics and Data Science, Nanjing Audit University, Nanjing 211815, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Forests 2023, 14(7), 1391; https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071391
Submission received: 27 May 2023 / Revised: 19 June 2023 / Accepted: 5 July 2023 / Published: 7 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Forest Economics, Policy, and Social Science)

Abstract

:
The goal of this article is to conduct a detailed study of China’s forestry industry chain and determine the effect it has on the national economy. Based on the 2018 China Input–Output Table (153 departments) and other relevant data released by the National Bureau of Statistics, as well as the input–output method established by Wassily Leontief, this article conducts a comprehensive and detailed analysis of China’s forest industry chain and its impact on the national economy. The results show that the backward industrial chain of China’s forestry industry involves 105 industrial departments. China’s forestry sector purchases the most products from the tertiary industry, accounting for 56.05% of all forestry purchases. The products of the tertiary industry have a significant impact on forestry. The forward industry chain of China’s forestry involves 131 industrial sectors, with China’s forestry selling the most products to the secondary industry, accounting for 93.47% of all forestry sales. The forestry sensitivity coefficient is 0.767 and the influence coefficient is 0.65. The secondary industry has a significant impact on the sales of forestry products. The impact of the forward industry chain is greater than that of the backward industry chain and the impact of forestry on the national economy is quite large. Suggestions about how to expand the planting area and production scale of domestic economic forests were put forward. An increase in the added value of exported forestry products, improved service quality of the tertiary industry to forestry, and improved quality and quantity of products provided by forestry to the secondary industry are necessary.

1. Introduction

The concept of the industrial chain first appeared in The Theory of Labor Division by Adam Smith FRSA. He believed that industrial production is composed of a series of interrelated chains and specialized divisions of labor that can improve productivity. The industrial chain is the process from production to final consumption of raw materials [1]. In the 1950s, Albert Otto Hirschman analyzed the industrial chain from the perspective of industrial linkage effects. He believed that the industrial chain is led by industrial linkages and it is formed by the strength of industrial connections [2]. In the 1980s, Harvard Business School professor Michael E. Porter proposed the “value chain analysis method”, which believed that a company’s value creation process mainly consists of two parts: basic activities and supportive activities. The relationship between the two is interdependent and complementary, forming the behavioral “chain” of company value creation, and this “chain” is referred to as the value chain [3]. Luis Cruz and his colleagues emphasize that the economic contribution of forests in Spain extends beyond figures associated with afforestation and the forestry industry, such as added value and employment. This highlights the importance of studying the value chain of forest products, which encompasses the primary end products that rely on the existence and development of forests. This value chain includes both direct and indirect products derived from timber and other forest resources. For instance, the production of “paper and paperboard products” does not directly depend on forest products. Instead, it relies on the consumption of “pulp”, which is derived from wood, and ultimately, the production of paper and paperboard requires timber. Such insights into the complex relationship between forest resources and their derived products are crucial for understanding the multifaceted economic contributions of forests [4].
In recent years, Chinese scholars have explored the concept of the forestry industry chain: Zou Fangfang believes that the scope of the forestry industry is very broad, including related content of the three industries. With the rapid development of the economy, the connection between forestry and the three major industries is becoming increasingly close, and the close cooperation of the three major industries forms the organic whole of the forestry industry [5]. According to Hong Chen, the forestry industry chain is a complex industry chain that includes upstream industries such as breeding and planting; midstream industries such as processing forest products as raw materials; and downstream industries such as warehousing, logistics, and marketing [6]. According to Zhiguang Zhang, one of the highest value-added uses of forestry resources is pulping and papermaking. In terms of environmental protection, the best raw material for pulp is wood fiber. During the pulping process, wood pulp is cleaner and easier to treat for pollutants than straw pulp. Therefore, it is logical for the pulp industry and paper making industry to work closely together to form a mutually beneficial and interdependent industrial chain [7].
It is necessary to study the forestry industrial chain. Ulf Johansen from Norway pointed out that the volume of mature forests in Norway is increasing due to large-scale afforestation efforts over the past few decades. National forestry policies emphasize sustainable and efficient resource utilization, as well as regional processing. They have developed a dynamic optimization model that integrates venture capital activities with regional macroeconomic factors. This model takes into account the forestry venture capital involved in the entire process, from logging to processing and sales to end users. By supplementing survey data with statistical data (input–output tables), they derive output and value-added multipliers for regions and the country. This enables them to consider the ripple effects of venture capital activities on the economy [8]. According to Youliang Ning, the scale of the forestry industry is huge, but the lack of cooperation among various links and the serious lag in the construction of socialized service systems weakens China’s international competitiveness [9]. According to Jiayan He, in order to fundamentally promote the sustainable and healthy development of the forestry industry, it is necessary to improve and optimize the structure of the forestry industry, achieve the transformation from low-end to high-end industry, expand the industrial chain to the maximum extent, enlarge the product market share, and strengthen market competitiveness [10].
Áine NíDhubháin, from Ireland, argued that the use of input–output models is rooted in the organization of data in tabular form. These tables present a snapshot of the economic structure of a country or region at a specific point in time, depicting the various flows of inputs into the production process. These flows are quantified in monetary terms and matched with corresponding outputs. In essence, the input–output model provides a clear framework for defining inter-industry linkages. It offers a visual representation of the economic landscape, showcasing the intricate relationships between different sectors and their interdependencies [11]. Many Chinese scholars often use traditional statistical indicator methods to study the forestry industry chain. Guoshuang Tian constructed an evaluation index system for the stability of the forestry ecological industry chain for analysis [12]. Guofeng Wang used the spatial econometric economic model (global Moran index, etc.) to analyze the spatial distribution and interdependence of China’s forestry production [13]. Guangyuan Qin analyzed the importance and driving effects of forestry in China using input–output models and the 2007 Input–Output Table [14].
In the past, there were few scholars using input–output methods to study the forestry industry chain. Their papers mainly focused on calculating and analyzing the relationship between forestry and the three industries. There was a lack of comprehensive industry correlation analysis of the forestry industry chain.
In this paper, the industrial chain refers to the form of the upstream and downstream chain relationship between the supply and demand of intermediate products formed between various industrial departments under certain economic and technological conditions. The forest industrial chain refers to the industrial chain that forestry production needs to purchase other industrial products and sell forestry products. This paper studies the impact of forestry on the national economy from the perspective of the supply chain and value chain between industries. In terms of research methods, differently from previous scholars’ research, this article takes the industrial correlation effect and input–output theory as an important theoretical framework, uses input–output methods, and calculates the input and distribution coefficients of the forestry industry based on data such as the 2018 China Input–Output Table (153 departments) released by the National Bureau of Statistics to study the forward and backward industrial chain status of China’s forestry production. Further, by calculating the influence and sensitivity coefficients of each industry and sorting and conducting cross analysis according to their numerical values, we can comprehensively observe the impact of forestry and the forest industry chain on the entire national economy. At the end, the conclusions and suggestions are summarized.
By calculating and analyzing, the following goals are achieved:
(1)
What industrial sectors does China’s forestry industry chain actually include? How much influence do these industrial sectors have in the forest industry chain?
(2)
How much impact does the forest industry chain have on the national economic system?
(3)
What are the problems and key elements for improvement?

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Research Methods

This article analyzes the input–output correlation of the forest industry chain by calculating the input and distribution coefficients and the influence and sensitivity coefficients of the forest industry.
This article directly describes and analyzes the backward and forward forest industry chain through the input and distribution coefficients of the forest industry.
By calculating the input coefficient, the input correlation between forestry and various industries in the forest industry chain can be analyzed. The input coefficient refers to the proportion of the product quantity of an industry consumed or purchased by forestry in the production process in relation to the total product quantity purchased by forestry. It is used to observe the industrial chain distribution of forestry purchasing various products as production supplies. It indicates the backward correlation of forestry and its degree of impact.
The output correlation between forestry and other industries in the forest industry chain can be analyzed by calculating the distribution coefficient. The distribution coefficient refers to the proportion of the amount of products sold by forestry or distributed to another industry in relation to the total amount of product sold by forestry to all industries. It is used to observe the distribution of the industrial chain in which forestry sells its own products to various industries as production supplies and indicates the forward correlation of forestry and its degree of impact [15,16].
In this article, the products purchased and sold by forestry refer to intermediate products used in production. Intermediate products refer to the products produced in one production process and then completely consumed or changed into a different form in another production process.
In order to have a deep understanding of what role the forest industry chain is playing in China, this article analyzes the degree of forward and backward correlation influence of the forest industry chain in China by calculating the influence and sensitivity coefficient of the forest industry.
The influence coefficient ( e j ) [17,18,19] refers to the degree to which changes in the production and demand of a certain industry have an impact on other production and supply industries. The influence coefficient formula is as follows:
e j = The   average   value   of   the   sum   of   the   column   coefficients   of   a   department   in   the   Leontief   inverse   matrix The   average   value   of   the   sum   of   all   the   column   coefficients   in   the   Leontief   inverse   matrix
If the influence coefficient ej > 1, it indicates that the influence of the industry is above the average level in all industries. The greater the influence coefficient, the higher the influence degree of the industry’s purchase of other industrial products, and the greater the effect is on other industries. If ej = 1, it indicates that the influence of the industry is at the average level in all industries. If ej <1, it indicates that the influence of the industry is at the downstream level in all industries.
The sensitivity coefficient (ei) [17,18,19] is used to study the degree to which the production and sales of an industry are affected by the production and demand of other industries. The sensitivity coefficient formula is as follows:
e i = The   average   value   of   the   sum   of   transverse   coefficients   of   a   department   in   the   Leontiev   inverse   matrix The   average   value   of   the   sum   of   all   transverse   coefficients   in   the   Leontiev   inverse   matrix
The sensitivity coefficient ei > 1 indicates that the sensitivity level received by the department is higher than the average social sensitivity level. The greater the sensitivity coefficient is, the greater the degree of demand sensitivity that the department receives, the greater the driving effect on the national economy, and the more it has the attributes of basic industries. It has more tendency to become a bottleneck industry if ei = 1. This indicates that the induction level of the industry is at the average level among all industries. If ei < 1, it indicates that the sensitivity of the industry is at the downstream level among all industries.

2.2. Data Source

The Chinese government conducts a national input–output survey every five years, with the main task of comprehensively reflecting China’s industrial structure and the economic and technological connections between various industrial sectors. It is credible and authoritative and is the most applicable and important method for studying the industrial chain. This year, China has issued a notice to carry out the eighth national input–output survey, and the data are expected to be released in the next year or two. Therefore, the seventh national input–output survey data used in this article are still the latest data. In December 2019, the Chinese government released the 2017 National Input–Output Table. Subsequently, based on the changes in industries in 2018, the 2018 China Input–Output Extension Table (153 industrial sectors, divided by product nature, with approximately 25,000 data) was compiled in 2020. This article analyzes the Chinese forest industry chain based on the 2018 Input–Output Table [20,21].

3. Results

3.1. Forward and Backward Correlation Analysis of Forestry Production

3.1.1. The Pulling Effect of Forestry Production on China’s Economy from the Perspective of Backward Correlation

The backward industrial chain of China’s forestry is the demand chain of forest products which reflects the demand for forestry to purchase other industrial products [22,23], according to China’s input–output data in 2018 (Table 1). The backward industrial chain involves 105 industrial departments. In 2018, the industries with a forestry input coefficient higher than 1% are as follows: agricultural, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery service products (31.51%), forest products (16.52%), fertilizers (8.03%), pesticides (6.55%), agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery machinery (5.31%), cargo transportation and auxiliary transportation activities (4.22%), monetary and other financial services (3.26%), science and technology promotion and application services (2.30%), wholesale (2.08%), insurance (1.63%), professional and technical services (1.62%), refined petroleum and nuclear fuel processing products (1.48%), and catering (1.12%). The intermediate products purchased from these industries account for 85.63% of all intermediate products required for forestry.
In China’s forestry production, fertilizers, pesticides, special machinery for agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery, and refined petroleum and nuclear fuel processing products that need to be purchased from the secondary industry account for 27.42% of the required intermediate products. The agricultural, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery service products that need to be purchased from the tertiary industry account for the largest number—31.51% of the total purchases. The cargo transport and auxiliary transport activities, monetary finance and other financial services, science and technology promotion and application services, wholesale, insurance, professional and technical services, and catering of the tertiary industry that also need to be purchased account for 24.54% of the required intermediate products. The forestry products belonging to the primary industry as intermediate products accounted for 16.52%. It can be seen that the role of China’s forestry in stimulating the national economy is in the order that the tertiary industry is bigger than the secondary industry, and both are bigger than the primary industry. The intermediate products of the tertiary industry such as agricultural, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery service products that forestry needs to purchase from takes 56.05% of the total industrial intermediate products. It has the largest pulling effect on the tertiary industry.

3.1.2. The Driving Effect of Forestry Production on China’s Economy from the Perspective of Forward Correlation

The forward industrial chain of China’s forestry is the supply chain of forest products that reflects the sales of forestry to other industries [22,23]; it involves 131 industrial departments, according to China’s input–output data in 2018 (Table 2). The industries whose forestry distribution coefficient is higher than 1% include wood processing and bamboo, rattan, palm, and grass products (38.12%), residential housing construction (14.61%), rubber products (11.35%), paper making and paper products (8.07%), forest products (5.16%), special chemical products and explosives, pyrotechnics, fireworks products (4.46%), furniture (4.23%), stadiums and other public buildings (2.98%), railway, road, tunnel, and bridge engineering construction (1.79%), architectural decoration and other construction services (1.58%), and arts and crafts (1.50%). Forestry sold its products to these industries as intermediate products, accounting for 88.69% of all intermediate products sold by forestry. The amount of forest products sold to secondary industries such as wood processing, bamboo, rattan, palm, and grass products, residential housing construction, rubber products, and paper and paper products as intermediate products accounted for 93.47% of all intermediate products. The tertiary industry accounted for only 1.37%, and the primary industry accounted for 5.16%. As far as the national economy is concerned, forestry has the largest role in promoting China’s secondary industry.

3.2. Comparative Analysis of the Intermediate Product Ripple Effects of China’s Forestry and Other Industries

3.2.1. How Forestry Production Affects China’s Economy from the Perspective of Influence Coefficients

The influence coefficient reflects the impact of the purchase demand of each industry on other supply industries and the impact of each industry’s demand chain [17,24], according to China’s input–output data in 2018 (Table 3). Among China’s 153 industrial departments, 79 have influence coefficients greater than 1. All 79 departments belong to the secondary industry except business services. The top 10 industries include computers, audio-visual equipment, communication equipment, radio and television equipment, radar and supporting equipment, electronic components, culture industry, office machinery, knitting or crochet knitting and its products, electrical machinery and equipment, and household appliances and other transportation equipment. There are 74 industries with an influence coefficient lower than 1, including 41 tertiary industries, 29 secondary industries, and 4 primary industries, namely, animal husbandry (with an influence coefficient of 0.773), fishery (0.717), agriculture (0.655), and forestry (0.65). The influence coefficient is ranked from large to small, and forestry ranks 144th. Forestry’s influence coefficient is 65% of the average. Compared with other industries, China’s forestry industry has a lower influence coefficient in purchasing intermediate products, ranking 10th from the bottom, higher than the industries of petroleum and natural gas exploitation products, retail, tobacco products, social work, education, capital market services, real estate, social security, and waste resources and waste materials recycling processing products.

3.2.2. How Forestry Production Affects China’s Economy from the Perspective of Sensitivity

The sensitivity coefficient reflects the sensitivity of each industry to other demand industries [17,24], and reflects the impact of each industry’s supply chain to other demand industries, according to China’s input–output data in 2018 (Table 4). Among China’s 153 industrial departments, 36 have sensitivity coefficients greater than 1, of which 24 belong to the secondary industry, 10 belong to the tertiary industry, and 2 belong to the primary industry, namely, agriculture (sensitivity coefficient 4.315) and animal husbandry (1.393). The top 10 industries with high sensitivity include: power and heat production and supply, electronic components, agriculture, monetary and other financial services, business services, wholesale, refined petroleum and nuclear fuel processing products, basic chemical raw materials, non-ferrous metals, and household appliances. There are 117 industries with sensitivity coefficients lower than 1, including 80 in the secondary industry, 35 in the tertiary industry, and 2 in the primary industry, namely, fishery (sensitivity coefficient is 0.81) and forestry (0.767). The sensitivity coefficients rank from large to small, and forestry ranks 65th. From the perspective of the sensitivity of intermediate product sales, the sensitivity coefficients of forest products are 76.7% of the average, higher than 88 industrial departments. From the perspective of the sensitivity coefficient, forestry plays a relatively large role in promoting China’s economy.

3.2.3. Comprehensive Analysis of Forestry Influence and Sensitivity

In order to study how forestry influences China’s economy, this paper classifies 153 industries in China from four perspectives: large influence coefficient and large sensitivity coefficient, large influence coefficient and small sensitivity coefficient, small influence coefficient and large sensitivity coefficient, and small influence coefficient and small sensitivity coefficient [25].
The industry in which the influence and sensitivity coefficient are both more than 1 has a strong stimulating effect on purchasing intermediate products from the upstream industry. After buying from the upstream industry, it produces more types of intermediate products and sells them to the downstream industry, so it also has a big impact on the downstream industry. In China, 17 departments, including electronic components (influence coefficient 1.34, sensitivity coefficient 4.691), have large influence coefficients and sensitivity coefficients. Except for business services, these departments all belong to the secondary industry, including wood processing, wood, bamboo, rattan, palm, and grass products (1.098, 1.156), and paper making and paper products (1.05, 1.872), which are highly related to forestry.
Industries with an influence greater than 1 and a sensitivity less than 1 have a strong effect on purchasing intermediate products produced by upstream industries, but their intermediate products sold to downstream industries have a relatively weak positive influence on those industries. In China, except for water passenger transport, 62 industrial sectors, including computers (1.455, 0.81), have a large influence coefficient and a small sensitivity coefficient, which are all secondary industries. Among them, special machinery for agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery (1.21, 0.478), special equipment for the chemical industry, wood, non-metallic processing (1.15, 0.507), pesticides (1.149, 0.602), furniture (1.143, 0.429), fertilizers (1.114, 0.863), rubber products (1.106, 0.889), railway, road, tunnel, and bridge engineering construction (1.096, 0.354), residential housing construction (1.089, 0.354), stadium and other public buildings (1.087, 0.354), arts and crafts (1.082, 0.417), and architectural decoration, decoration, and other architectural services (1.058, 0.616) are relatively related to forestry.
Industries with an influence less than 1 and a sensitivity greater than 1 have a relatively weak stimulating effect on purchasing intermediate products produced by upstream industries, but their intermediate products have a relatively strong impact on selling to downstream industries. The industries with a small influence coefficient and a large sensitivity coefficient in China include 20 industries such as power and heat production and supply (0.995, 4.998), among which 10 belong to the tertiary industry, 8 belong to the secondary industry, and 2 belong to the primary industry, including animal husbandry (0.773, 1.393) and agriculture (0.655, 4.315). Among them, industries such as professional and technical services (0.963, 1.078), catering (0.933, 1.266), refined petroleum and nuclear fuel processing products (0.905, 3.275), cargo transportation and auxiliary transportation activities (0.818, 2.287), monetary finance and other financial services (0.699, 4.247), and wholesale (0.654, 3.52) are closely related to forestry.
Industries with influence and sensitivity coefficients less than 1 are industries with weak effects. There are 54 industries with a small influence coefficient and sensitivity coefficient in China, including graphite and other non-metallic mineral products (0.999, 0.858), among which 32 belong to the tertiary industry, 20 belong to the secondary industry, and 2 belong to the primary industry, including fishery (0.717, 0.81) and forestry (0.65, 0.767). Science and technology promotion and application services (0.995, 0.768), insurance (0.826, 0.751), and agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery services (0.799, 0.74) are relatively related to forestry. Among the industries whose influence coefficient and sensitivity coefficient are less than 1, only 5 industries have an influence coefficient less than forestry, such as tobacco products; in terms of sensitivity, 38 industries, such as water cargo transportation and auxiliary transportation activities, are smaller than forestry. It can be seen that in industries with small influence and sensitivity coefficients, although the forestry sensitivity coefficient is less than 1, its sensitivity coefficient is still greater than 38 industrial sectors. The demand for forest products from downstream industrial sectors is greater than that from forestry to upstream industrial sectors.

4. Discussion

Looking at the forestry industry chain, the data calculated by the input–output table above reflects the current situation of China’s forestry industry chain under its economic and technological conditions. Based on its distribution, this article discusses the existing problems and key directions for improvement.
As far as the backward industrial chain is concerned, the intermediate product value chain of China’s backward forestry industry has the greatest impact on the tertiary industry, followed by the secondary industry. Among 153 departments, the backward industrial chain in China involves 105 industrial departments, and there are 39 industries in the tertiary industry and the proportion of intermediate products from the third industry accounts for 56.05% of the total. The value and proportion of the tertiary industry chain are the highest [26]. Therefore, improving the service quality of the tertiary industry for the forestry industry has become an important issue. The current forestry socialized service system is lagging behind and the development of the forestry tertiary industry is still insufficient, so it is necessary to improve the service quality of the tertiary industry of the forestry chain, especially agriculture, animal husbandry, and fishing services. Secondly, although forestry requires intermediate products from the secondary industry accounting only for 27.42%, the backward industrial chain of forestry includes as many as 65 industries in the secondary industry. Thus, it is also important to improve the quality of the secondary industry products that invest in forestry products, accelerate technological progress, and improve the economic benefits of forestry. Thirdly, forestry requires a big proportion of self-industry services, accounting for 16.52%. Consequently, attention should be paid to the improvement of forestry’s own industry services. To achieve a transition from a lower-end industrial chain to a higher-end industrial chain, a higher-level developed forestry investment structure and industrial chain should be formed.
As far as the forward industrial chain is concerned, the intermediate product value chain of China’s forward forestry industry has the greatest impact on the secondary industry, followed by the primary industry. The second industry chain has the highest value and the largest proportion. Among the 153 departments, China’s forestry forward industry chain involves 131 industrial sectors. The secondary industry in the forestry forward industry chain has 89 industries, and the proportion of forest products required to be provided to the secondary industry is 93.47%. Therefore, it is important to focus on the quantity and quality of products provided by forestry to the secondary industry. Forestry needs to accelerate scientific and technological research and development, create branded products, and pay special attention to improving the quantity and quality of forest products provided to industries such as wood processing, bamboo and rattan products, paper and paper products, furniture, and residential construction. It is important to promote the development of industries such as forestry biomass energy, materials, and medicine, and increase investment in ecological and leisure tourism [27]. In addition to domestically produced products, imported forest products are also included in forestry sales. Investment, consumption, and exports of Chinese forestry products account for 54.62%, 42.54%, and 2.84% of the total final use in the country, with exports having the smallest proportion. China’s forest product imports are large, with a trade deficit of 96.5 billion yuan. The import volume of forest products is 73.97 times that of exports, indicating a heavy dependence on imported forest products in the economy. It is correct to expand imports to protect precious forest resources, but in the case of restrictions on certain imported wood materials, it will be necessary to continue to expand the planting area and production scale of domestic economic forests in the future and strive to increase the added value of exported forest products, forming a coordinated distribution of the forestry forward industry chain among the three industries.
From the perspective of forest production, forest cultivation remains weak; China’s forest coverage reached 23.04% by the end of 2020, with a forest stock volume of 175 billion cubic meters and a forest area of 220 million hectares. With a total investment of 452.5 billion yuan by 2019 [28], China has achieved great success in forestry development. However, the current forest coverage rate in China is still below the global average of 32%, and the per capita forest area is only a quarter of the world average. The quantity of forest products is far from meeting the needs of the national economy. Therefore, it is crucial to strengthen forest cultivation and continue expanding afforestation and greening areas, with a particular focus on Northeast China, North China, and Northwest China. It is essential to coordinate the management and construction of the mountain–water–forest–field–lake–grass–sand ecological system [29], change the planting structure of forest products, and increase the high-value timber of long-term rotation forests [30]. Furthermore, it is important to increase support and investment in forestry ecological compensation areas, protected areas, and forest management areas. Additionally, a mechanism for resource compensation and ecological compensation should be established. Accelerating technological innovation and talent development are also necessary. By expanding forest coverage, China can not only meet the growing demand for forest products but also provide more forest products to support economic development. Efforts must be made to meet the needs of the national economy for forest products.
Assessing the role of forestry in the national economy from the perspective of the forestry industry chain, both the impact coefficient (0.65) and the induction coefficient (0.767) of forestry are less than 1. This suggests the economic driving and pushing forces of forestry are weaker than the average level of all industries. From the perspective of the influence of forestry’s own purchase of intermediate products, the driving effect on the national economy is relatively small. However, in terms of the sensitivity coefficient of forest product sales, the forestry sensitivity coefficient ranks higher among various industries. The demand of downstream industrial departments for forestry products is far greater than the demand of upstream industrial departments for forestry products. Also, the downstream industrial chain of forestry is longer than the upstream industrial chain. Among the industries in China with an influence coefficient and sensitivity coefficient greater than 1, wood processing and the production of wood, bamboo, rattan, palm, and grass products (1.098, 1.156), as well as paper and paper products (1.05, 1.872), have a significant correlation with forestry. In summary, forestry plays a great role in promoting the national economy when it comes to the sensitivity coefficient. The national economy has a high demand for the forest industry.
Conducting a detailed study of the upstream and downstream industry chain of the forest industry is beneficial because it provides valuable information for formulating appropriate policy measures and identifies key areas and directions for optimizing the industry chain. This research can be utilized to strengthen the planning, organization, and construction of China’s forest industry chain, optimize the structure of the forest industry, improve the quality of China’s forestry industry chain, and promote high-quality development in the forestry sector.

5. Conclusions

In this study, we employed the input-output method and real data from China to investigate the current status and crucial areas for improvement within the intricate forestry industry chain. By examining the backward linkages and forward inducements across all sectors of the Chinese economy, we have discovered that the forestry industry chain plays a substantial role in the national economy. Particularly, the downstream industries exhibit a significant demand for forestry products, underscoring the importance of enhancing the quality and quantity of these products. By utilizing comprehensive input-output data from 153 sectors in China, our research not only contributes to a deeper understanding of the complexities within the forestry industry chain but also provides valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders to analyze and optimize the industry chain. Furthermore, our findings serve as a valuable reference for studying the interdependencies within other industry chains, making a meaningful contribution to the field of economic analysis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.C.; methodology, W.J. and X.J.; software, W.J.; validation, W.J. and X.J.; formal analysis, W.J.; investigation, W.J.; resources, X.J.; data curation, W.J. and X.J.; writing—original draft preparation, W.J.; writing—review and editing, X.J.; visualization, W.J.; supervision, F.C.; project administration, F.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset used in this study is available at http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/ and http://cioa.ruc.edu.cn/zlxz/trccb/index.htm (accessed on 4 July 2023).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wei, J. Analysis of Adam Smith’s Division of Labor Theory. Enterp. Reform Manag. 2015, 23, 74–75. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang, Z. Extension of the Industrial Chain in Resource-based Mining Areas and Sustainable Development of Mining Areas. Xuzhou Inst. Technol. 2006, 5, 40–44. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhang, X. Corporate Behavior and Competitive Advantage: A Review of Michael Porter’s Value Chain Theory. Int. Econ. Trade Res. 1997, 3, 34–37. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  4. Cruz, L.; Ramos, P.; Barata, E.; Ferreira, J.P. The forestry products value chain and the costs of reshaping it: Multi-regional impacts of shrinking the pulp and paper industries in Portugal. Investig. Reg. = J. Reg. Res. 2021, 51, 149–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zou, F.; Chen, Q. Research on the Construction of “Forestry—Tourism” Ecological Industry Chain. Issues For. Econ. 2019, 39, 590–598. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, H.; Gao, E. Study on Low Carbon Forestry Industry Chain. China For. Econ. 2011, 3, 19–22. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, Z. A New Trend in Forestry Industry Administration: Forestry Green Supply Chain. For. Econ. 2008, 12, 57–62. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  8. Johansen, U.; Werner, A.; Nørsteb, V. Optimizing the Wood Value Chain in Northern Norway Taking into Account National and Regional Economic Trade-Offs. Forests 2017, 8, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ning, Y.; Shen, W.; Song, C.; Zhao, R. Studying on the Promotion Strategies of High quality Development of Forestry Industry. Agric. Econ. Issues 2021, 2, 117–122. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. He, J. Preliminary study on forestry industry development and forest resources protection measures. New Agric. 2021, 4, 18. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  11. Dhubháin, Á.N.; Fléchard, M.-C.; Moloney, R.; O’Connor, D. Assessing the value of forestry to the Irish economy—An input-output approach. For. Policy Econ. 2009, 11, 50–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, G. Analysis of the Forestry Ecological Industrial Chain Construction Stability and Evaluation Index. For. Econ. 2014, 11, 74–79. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  13. Wang, G.; Chen, J.; Deng, X. Modelling Analysis of Forestry Input-Output Elasticity in China. Int. J. For. Res. 2016, 2016, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Qin, G.; Liu, H. The Driving Effects of Forest Industry in China: An Input-Output Analysis. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhong, Q.; Yu, J.; Shao, H.; Zhang, J. Economic Plan; Renmin University of China Press: Beijing, China, 1986. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  16. Li, L.; Wu, W.; Zhang, M.; Lin, L. Linkage Analysis between Finance and Environmental Protection Sectors in China: An Approach to Evaluating Green Finance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Liu, Z.; An, T. Analysis of Modern Industrial Economy; Nanjing University Press: Nanjing, China, 2009; Volume 5, pp. 111–115. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  18. Choi, J.; Kim, W.; Choi, S. The Economic Effects of China’s Distribution Industry: An Input-Output Analysis. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Suha, J. The role of the forestry industry for the success of community forestry: A comparative input–output analysis across India and the Philippines. South. For. A J. For. Sci. 2014, 76, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. National Bureau of Statistics of China. The Input-Output Table of China. In China Statistical Yearbook; National Bureau of Statistics: Beijing, China, (In Chinese). Available online: http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/ndsj/ (accessed on 4 July 2023).
  21. National Bureau of Statistics of China. Input-Output Table 2002–2018. In China Input Output Association; National Bureau of Statistics: Beijing, China, (In Chinese). Available online: http://cioa.ruc.edu.cn/zlxz/trccb/index.htm. (accessed on 4 July 2023).
  22. Jia, X. Study on Industrial Structure of China; Nanjing Normal University Press: Nanjing, China, 2004; Volume 12, p. 142. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  23. Jia, X. Study on Industrial Structure of Yangtze River Delta; Economic Science Press: Beijing, China, 2011; Volume 12, pp. 127–131. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  24. Gao, M.; Li, J.; Xu, J. Principles of National Economic Accounting and Practice in China; Renmin University of China Press: Beijing, China, 2007; pp. 128–129. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  25. Jia, X. The Research on the Chinese Industrial Development and the Key for Industrial Adjustment. Stat. Res. 2001, 11, 12–16. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  26. Jiang, Z. Modern Forestry of China; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2008; Volume 10, pp. 316–317. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  27. Cai, D. Forest Culture & Ecological Civilization; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2011; Volume 3, pp. 322–324. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  28. National Bureau of Statistics of China. National Statistical Yearbook-2022; National Bureau of Statistics: Beijing, China, 2023; pp. 8–36. (In Chinese)
  29. Kimmins, J.P.; Cao, F. Forest Culture & Ecological Civilization; China Forestry Publishing House: Beijing, China, 2005; Volume 8, pp. 541–542. [Google Scholar]
  30. Hung, D.M.; Trinh, B. Forestry Sector and Policies on Sustainable Development in Vietnam: Analyze from the Input—Output Model. Int. J. Soc. Adm. Sci. 2019, 4, 253–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Input coefficient table of forest products in China in 2018. Unit:%.
Table 1. Input coefficient table of forest products in China in 2018. Unit:%.
Department NameInfluence CoefficientRank
Agricultural, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishing service products31.5101
Forest product16.5202
Fertilizer8.0303
Pesticides6.5504
Special machinery for agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishing5.3105
Road freight transportation and transportation assistance activities4.2206
Monetary finance and other financial services3.2607
Technology promotion and application services2.3008
Wholesale2.0809
Insurance1.6310
Professional technical services1.6211
Refined petroleum and nuclear fuel processing products1.4812
Food and beverage1.1213
Metalware0.9714
Retail0.9515
Water cargo transportation and transportation assistance activities0.8816
Electricity and heat production and supply0.7717
Capital market services0.7218
Other transportation equipment0.6319
Drinks0.6320
Textile, clothing, and apparel0.6121
Railway freight transportation and transportation auxiliary activities0.5822
Public management and social organizations0.5423
Railway passenger transportation0.5024
Air cargo transportation and transportation assistance activities0.5025
Loading, unloading, handling, and warehousing0.4926
Other services0.4127
Internet and related services0.3828
Telecom0.3629
Cultural, educational, sports, and entertainment supplies0.3530
Multimodal transportation and transportation agency0.3231
Air passenger transport0.3032
Post office0.2933
Accommodation0.2734
Coal mining and washing products0.1935
Business services0.1936
Pharmaceutical products0.1937
Urban public transportation and highway passenger transportation0.1838
Refined tea0.1739
Automotive parts and accessories0.1640
Home appliances0.1441
Daily chemical products0.1442
Steel rolling products0.1143
Production and supply of water0.1044
Building decoration, decoration, and other building services0.0845
Water conservancy management0.0846
Computer0.0847
Other general equipment0.0848
Education0.0849
Cultural and office machinery0.0750
Pipeline transportation0.0751
Glass and glass products0.0652
Furniture0.0653
Wood processing and wood, bamboo, rattan, palm, and grass products0.0654
Tobacco products0.0655
Paper and paper products0.0556
Culture and art0.0557
Gas production and supply0.0558
Social security0.0559
Alcohol and liquor0.0460
Knitting or crochet weaving and its products0.0461
Metal products, machinery, and equipment repair services0.0462
Textile manufactured goods0.0363
Other manufactured products0.0364
Leather, fur, feathers, and their products0.0265
Lease0.0266
Entertainment0.0267
Water passenger transportation0.0268
News and publishing0.0269
Sanitation0.0170
Other specialized equipment0.0171
Ecological protection and environmental governance0.0172
Production of radio, television, film, and film recordings0.0173
Rubber products0.0174
Electric machinery0.0175
Transmission, distribution, and control equipment0.0176
Pumps, valves, compressors, and similar machinery0.0177
Note: The data in the table are calculated and collated according to the 2018 China Input–Output Table. The input coefficients for the industries listed in the table are all above 0.01%. Due to the fact that China’s Input–Output Table is structured based on product departments, the forestry sector is referred to as ‘forest products’ in the table, and the same logic applies to other industries.
Table 2. Distribution coefficient table of forest products in China in 2018. Unit:%.
Table 2. Distribution coefficient table of forest products in China in 2018. Unit:%.
Department NameInfluence CoefficientRank
Wood processing and bamboo, rattan, palm, and grass products38.1201
Residential building construction14.6102
Rubber products11.3503
Paper and paper products8.0704
Forest product5.1605
Specialized chemical and explosives, pyrotechnic and fireworks products4.4606
Furniture4.2307
Sports venues and other housing buildings2.9808
Railway, road, tunnel, and bridge engineering construction1.7909
Building decoration, decoration, and other building services1.5810
Handicraft article1.5011
Other civil engineering buildings0.9612
Shoes0.4413
Agricultural, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishing service products0.4314
Cultural, educational, sports, and entertainment supplies0.4015
Other manufactured products0.3416
Coal mining and washing products0.3417
Pharmaceutical products0.2618
Vegetables, fruits, nuts, and other processed agricultural and sideline 0.2519
Food and beverage 0.2020
Daily chemical products0.1821
Gypsum cement products and similar products0.1722
Synthetic material0.1523
Monetary finance and other financial services0.1524
Metalware0.1525
Building installation0.1326
Public facilities and land management0.1127
Building materials such as bricks, tiles, stones, etc.0.1128
Other foods0.1129
Resident services0.0830
Ecological protection and environmental governance0.0731
Drinks0.0632
Glassware0.0633
Special equipment for chemical, wood, and non-metallic processing0.0634
Home appliances0.0535
Air cargo transportation and transportation assistance activities0.0536
Business services0.0537
Other specialized equipment0.0538
Chemical fiber products0.0439
Cotton, chemical fiber textiles, and printing and dyeing finished products0.0440
Telecom0.0341
Vegetable oil processed products0.0342
Non-metallic mineral mining and beneficiation products0.0343
Non-ferrous metal mining and beneficiation products0.0344
Steel rolling products0.0245
Car0.0246
Alcohol and liqueur0.0247
Education0.0248
Railway passenger transportation0.0249
Entertainment0.0150
Refractory products0.0151
Pipeline transportation0.0152
Automotive parts and accessories0.0153
Railway freight transportation and transportation auxiliary activities0.0154
Accommodation0.0155
Refined petroleum and nuclear fuel processing products0.0156
Ships and related installations0.0157
Non-ferrous metals and their alloys0.0158
Non-ferrous metal rolling products0.0159
Metal products, machinery, and equipment repair services0.0460
Electricity and heat production and supply0.0461
Retail0.0462
Oven, fan, packaging, and other equipment0.0363
Electric machinery0.0364
Cement, lime, and gypsum0.0265
Ferrous metal products0.0266
Wholesale0.0267
Research and experimental0.0268
Urban public transportation and highway passenger transportation0.0269
Professional technical services0.0170
Capital market services0.0171
Graphite and other non-metallic mineral products0.0172
Transmission, distribution, and control equipment0.0173
Road freight transportation and transportation assistance activities0.0174
Other electrical machinery and equipment0.0175
Insurance0.0176
Feed processing products0.0177
Material handling equipment0.0178
Electric wires, cables, optical cables, and electrical equipment0.0179
Iron and iron alloy products0.0180
Note: The data in the table are calculated and collated according to the 2018 China Input–Output Table. The industrial distribution coefficients listed in the table are all above 0.01%.
Table 3. The influence coefficient of some industrial departments in China in 2018 (in descending order).
Table 3. The influence coefficient of some industrial departments in China in 2018 (in descending order).
Department NameInfluence CoefficientRank
Computer1.455 01
Audio-visual equipment 1.405 02
Communication equipment1.403 03
Radio and television equipment, radar and supporting equipment1.369 04
Electronic components 1.340 05
Culture and office machinery1.330 06
Knitting or crochet knitting and its products1.315 07
Other electrical machinery and equipment1.305 08
Household appliances1.279 09
Other transportation equipment 1.265 10
Special machinery for agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery1.210 21
Special equipment for chemical, wood, and non-metallic processing1.150 41
Pesticide1.149 42
Fertilizer1.114 49
Rubber products 1.106 51
Wood processing and wood, bamboo, rattan, palm, grass products1.098 53
Residential buildings 1.089 56
Sports venues and other buildings 1.087 57
Arts and crafts 1.082 59
Building decoration and other building services1.058 67
Paper and paper products1.050 70
Science and technology promotion and application service0.99581
Vegetables, fruits, nuts, and other agricultural and sideline food processed products 0.98687
Professional technical service0.96391
Catering0.93398
Livestock products0.773132
Fishing products0.717139
Monetary finance and other financial services0.699141
Agricultural products0.655142
Wholesale0.654143
Forest products0.650144
Petroleum and natural gas exploitation products0.650145
Retail 0.642146
Tobacco products0.639147
Social work 0.618148
Education0.610149
Capital market services0.601150
Real estate0.563151
Social security0.539152
Recycling and processing products of waste resources and materials0.451153
Note: The data in the table are calculated and collated according to the 2018 China Input–Output Table. Since there are 153 departments and too many industries, this table only lists the industrial departments with the largest and smallest influence and relatively high correlation with forestry. The influence coefficient of the selected industrial departments are ranked from large to small as indicated in the table.
Table 4. Sensitivity coefficients of 153 industrial departments in China in 2018 (in descending order).
Table 4. Sensitivity coefficients of 153 industrial departments in China in 2018 (in descending order).
Department NameCoefficient SensitivityRank
Electric power and heat production and supply 4.998 01
Electronic components4.691 02
Agricultural products 4.315 03
Monetary and other financial services 4.247 04
Business services 4.221 05
Wholesale3.520 06
Refined petroleum and nuclear fuel processing products 3.275 07
Basic chemical raw materials3.261 08
Non-ferrous metals and their alloys 3.172 09
Petroleum and natural gas exploitation products3.060 10
Retail2.50011
Road cargo transportation and auxiliary transportation activities2.287 14
Specialized chemical products and explosives, initiatives, fireworks 2.021 20
Paper making and paper products1.872 23
Livestock products 1.393 24
Catering1.266 27
Wood processing and wood, bamboo, rattan, palm, grass products1.156 31
Professional technical services 1.078 34
Rubber products 0.889 42
Fertilizer0.863 48
Fishery products0.810 57
Science and technology promotion and application service0.768 63
Forest products0.767 65
Insurance0.751 68
Agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery service products 0.740 70
Building decoration and other building services0.616 87
Pesticides 0.602 89
Special equipment for chemical, wood, and non-metallic processing0.507 108
Special machinery for agriculture, forestry, animal husbandry, and fishery0.478 117
Furniture0.429 131
Ecological protection and environment0.424 132
Arts and crafts 0.417 133
News and publishing0.397 139
Research and test development 0.355 147
Residential buildings0.354 148
Sports venues and other buildings0.354 149
Railway, road, tunnel, and bridge engineering construction 0.354 150
Other civil engineering buildings 0.354 151
Building installation0.354 152
Social work0.354 153
Note: The data in the table are calculated and collated according to the 2018 China Input–Output Table. As there are 153 departments and too many industries, this table only lists the industrial departments with the highest sensitivity, the lowest sensitivity, and relatively high relevance to forestry. The influence coefficient of the selected industrial departments are ranked from large to small as indicated in the table.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jia, W.; Cao, F.; Jia, X. Input–Output Analysis of China’s Forest Industry Chain. Forests 2023, 14, 1391. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071391

AMA Style

Jia W, Cao F, Jia X. Input–Output Analysis of China’s Forest Industry Chain. Forests. 2023; 14(7):1391. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071391

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jia, Wenting, Fuliang Cao, and Xiaofeng Jia. 2023. "Input–Output Analysis of China’s Forest Industry Chain" Forests 14, no. 7: 1391. https://doi.org/10.3390/f14071391

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop