National Implementation of the Forest Europe Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Development of the Pan-European Criteria and Indicators for SFM
1.2. Improvement Processes of the C&I for SFM
1.3. Objectives
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Development of National Sets of Indicators for SFM
3.1.1. Structure of the National Indicator Sets
3.1.2. Inclusion of Targets or Thresholds as Tools for Assessments of SFM
3.2. Linking the National Set of SFM Indicators to National Objectives or Strategies
3.3. Information and Communication Function of C&I Sets
3.3.1. Key Indicators, Indices, and National Subsets of Indicators
3.3.2. Model-Based Elaboration
3.3.3. Data Availability for All National SFM Indicators
3.3.4. Basis for a Related National Report on SFM
4. Conclusions and Outlook
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
BOKU | University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna |
C&I | Criteria and indicators |
FAO | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations |
FE | Forest Europe |
FRA | Forest Resources Assessments of the FAO |
ITTO | International Tropical Timber Organization |
MCPFE | Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe |
MEDMONT | Monitoring in the Mediterranean Areas |
SEMAFOR | System for the Evaluation of the Management of Forests |
SFM | Sustainable forest management |
References
- Linser, S.; Wolfslehner, B.; Asmar, F.; Bridge, S.R.J.; Gritten, D.; Guadalupe, V.; Jafari, M.; Johnson, S.; Laclau, P.; Robertson, G. 25 years of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: Why some intergovernmental C&I processes flourished while others faded. Forests 2018, 9, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Linser, S.; Wolfslehner, B.; Pülzl, H. The Genesis of the Pan-European Criteria and Indicators and Their Further Development towards Emerging Policy Needs. In Proceedings of the XIV World Forestry Congress Forests and People: Investing in a Sustainable Future, Sub-Theme Monitoring Forests for Better Decision-Making, Durban, South Africa, 7–11 September 2015; Available online: http://foris.fao.org/wfc2015/api/file/5547e25b15ae74130aee6a6b/contents/a7b97f2c-a66c-4e64-9b50-66b5114551ef.pdf (accessed on 5 May 2021).
- Forest Europe. Work Programme 2021–2024; Forest Europe Liaison Unit: Bonn, Germany, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- MCPFE. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, 16–17 June 1993 in Helsinki Documents; Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry: Helsinki, Finland, 1993; ISBN 951-47-8283-6. [Google Scholar]
- MCPFE. European List of Criteria and Most Suitable Quantitative Indicators; Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry: Helsinki, Finland, 1994. [Google Scholar]
- MCPFE. Vienna Living Forest Summit Declaration. European Forests—Common Benefits, Shared Responsibilities. In Proceedings of the Fourth Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, MCPFE Liaison Unit, Vienna, Austria, 28–30 April 2003; Available online: https://foresteurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/ALL_COMMITMENTS.pdf (accessed on 5 May 2021).
- MCPFE. Third Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe. General Declaration and Resolutions Adopted. Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Fisheries of Portugal and Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, Lisbon, Portugal, 1998. Available online: https://foresteurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/ALL_COMMITMENTS.pdf (accessed on 5 May 2021).
- MCPFE. Third Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, June 1998 in Lisbon. Resolution L2: Pan-European Criteria, Indicators and Operational Level Guidelines for Sustainable Forest Management. Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Fisheries of Portugal and MCPFE Liaison Unit: Lisbon, Portugal, 1998. Available online: https://foresteurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/ALL_COMMITMENTS.pdf (accessed on 5 May 2021).
- EFI. Implementing Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management in Europe; European Forest Institute, Ed.; European Forest Institute: Joensuu, Finland, 2013; ISBN 978-952-5980-04-2. [Google Scholar]
- Baycheva-Merger, T.; Wolfslehner, B. Evaluating the implementation of the pan-European criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management—A SWOT analysis. Ecol. Indic. 2016, 60, 1192–1199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linser, S.; Wolfslehner, B.; Gritten, D.; Rasi, R.; Johnson, S.; Bridge, S.R.J.; Payn, T.; Prins, K.; Robertson, G. 25 years of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management—Have they made a difference? Forests 2018, 9, 578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Standing Forestry Committee; Working Group on Sustainable Forest Management Criteria & Indicators. Final Report of the Standing Forestry Committee Ad Hoc; EC DG Agriculture and Rural Development: Brussels, Belgium, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. Project on Strengthening Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management in Policy and Practice; Final report submitted to the FAO, unpublished; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. Keeping an Eye on SDG 15—Working with Countries to Measure Indicators for Forests and Mountains; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2013; Available online: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i7334e.pdf (accessed on 1 June 2021).
- United Nations. Global Indicator Framework for the Sustainable Development Goals and Targets of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development; A/RES/71/313 E/CN.3/2018/2; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Forest Europe. Minutes of the Forest Europe Expert Group to Propose Improvements in Tools for Sustainable Forest Management, 4–5 June 2014 in Helsinki; Forest Europe Liaison Unit: Madrid, Spain, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Forest Europe. Final Report of the Forest Europe Advisory Group on the Updating of the Pan-European Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management. 3 June 2015; Forest Europe Liaison Unit: Madrid, Spain, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Linser, S.; Wolfslehner, B. Report on the Mid-Term Evaluation: Meeting the Goals for European Forests and the European 2020 Targets for Forests; Forest Europe Liaison Unit: Madrid, Spain, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Linser, S. Critical Analysis of the Basics for the Assessment of Sustainable Development by Indicators; Freiburger Forstliche Forschung, Vol. 17; Forstliche Versuchs- und Forschungsanstalt Baden-Württemberg: Freiburg, Germany, 2002; p. 157. ISBN 3-933548-17-9. [Google Scholar]
- Forest Europe. Madrid Ministerial Declaration—25 Years Together Promoting Sustainable Forest Management in Europe; Forest Europe Liaison Unit: Madrid, Spain, 2015; Available online: https://foresteurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/ALL_COMMITMENTS.pdf (accessed on 5 May 2021).
- MCPFE. State of Europe’s Forests 2003; The MCPFE Report on Sustainable Forest Management in Europe; MCPFE Liaison Unit: Vienna, Austria, 2003; ISBN 3-902073-09-8. [Google Scholar]
- Forest Europe. State of Europe’s Forests 2007; The MCPFE Report on Sustainable Forest Management in Europe; Forest Europe Liaison Unit: Warsaw, Poland, 2007; ISBN 978-83-922396-8-0. [Google Scholar]
- Forest Europe; UNECE; FAO. State of Europe’s Forests 2011; Status and Trends in Sustainable Forest Management in Europe; Forest Europe Liaison Unit: Oslo, Norway, 2011; ISBN 978-82-92980-05-7. [Google Scholar]
- Forest Europe. State of Europe’s Forests 2015; Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe; Forest Europe Liaison Unit: Madrid, Spain, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Forest Europe. The State of Europe’s Forests 2020; Köhl, M., Linser, S., Prins, K., Eds.; Forest Europe Liaison Unit: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Forest Europe. Minutes of the Kick-Off Meeting of the Expert Group on Implementation of Updated Pan-European Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management, 24–25 January 2017; Forest Europe Liaison Unit: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Pülzl, H.; Mayer, P. Assessment of the Achievements and Added Value of the Forest Europe Process, Unpublished Report. In Proceedings of the Forest Europe Expert Level Meeting in Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 20–22 January 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Forest Europe. Future Direction of Forest Europe; Final Report: Survey Results and Recommendations for Action; Forest Europe Liaison Unit: Bratislava, Slovakia, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- ITTO. Twenty-Five Success Stories: Illustrating ITTO’s 25-Year Quest to Sustain Tropical Forests; ITTO: Yokohama, Japan, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Harisson, C. Mail Surveys and Paper Questionnaires. In Handbook of Survey Research; Emerald: Bingley, UK, 2010; pp. 527–551. [Google Scholar]
- Dillman, D.A.; Messer, B.L. Mixed-Mode Surveys. In Handbook of Survey Research; Emerald: Bingley, UK, 2010; pp. 551–574. [Google Scholar]
- Lijphart, A. Comparative Politics and the Comparative Method. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 1971, 3, 682–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Collier, D. The Comparative Method. In Political Science: The State of Discipline II; Finiter, A.W., Ed.; American Political Science Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1993; pp. 105–119. [Google Scholar]
- Rametsteiner, E.; Linser, S. Gesamteuropäische Kriterien für Nachhaltige Waldbewirtschaftung. Forstzeitung 2001, 112, 34–35. [Google Scholar]
- McCool, S.; Stankey, G. Representing the Future: A Framework for Evaluating the Utility of Indicators in the Search for Sustainable Forest Management. In Criteria and Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management; Raison, R., Brown, A., Flinn, D., Eds.; CAB International: Wallingford, UK, 2001; pp. 93–109. ISBN 978-0851993928. [Google Scholar]
- Rametsteiner, E.; Pülzl, H.; Alkan-Olsson, J.; Frederiksen, P. Sustainability indicator development—Science or political negotiation? Ecol. Indic. 2011, 11, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wolfslehner, B.; Vacik, H. Mapping indicator models: From intuitive problem structuring to quantified decision-making in sustainable forest management. Ecol. Indic. 2011, 11, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- United Nations. Earth Summit Agenda 21, The United Nations Program of Action from Rio; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 1997; p. 294. [Google Scholar]
- FAO. Global Forest Resources Assessments. Available online: http://www.fao.org/forest-resources-assessmen (accessed on 6 May 2021).
- UNECE. Pilot Project on the System for the Evaluation of the Management of Forests (SEMAFOR); Geneva Timber and Forest Discussion Paper 66; United Nations: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Onida, M. Forest and forestry policy between the EU and its Member States. ELNI Rev. 2020, 22–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lier, M.; Köhl, M.; Korhonen, K.; Linser, S.; Prins, K. Forest relevant targets in EU policy instruments—Can progress be measured by the pan-European criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management? For. Policy Econ. 2021, 128, 102481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kelley, J.G.; Simmons, B.A. Politics by number: Indicators as social pressure in international relations. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 2015, 59, 55–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- MCPFE. Vienna Resolution 1. Strenghen Synergies for Sustainable Forest Management in Europe through Cross-Sectoral Cooperation and National Forest Programmes. In Proceedings of the Fourth Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, Vienna, Austria, 28–30 April 2003; MCPFE Liaison Unit: Vienna, Austria. Available online: https://foresteurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/ALL_COMMITMENTS.pdf (accessed on 5 May 2021).
- Yamasaki, S.H.; Kneeshaw, D.D.; Munson, A.D.; Dorion, F. Bridging boundaries among disciplines and institutions for effective implementation of criteria and indicators. For. Chron. 2002, 78/4, 487–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- EC Standing Forestry Committee; Ad Hoc Working Group on Sustainable Forest Management Criteria & Indicators. Final Report; EC: Brussels, Belgium, 2015; p. 24. [Google Scholar]
- FAO Committee on Forestry. Accelerating Progress towards SDG 15; FO:COFO/2018/5.1; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations. Monitoring, Assessment and Reporting: Progress on the Implementation of the United Nations Strategic Plan for Forests 2017–2030, including the United Nations Forest Instrument, and Voluntary National Contributions; Note by the Secretariat, E/CN.18/2021/5; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- United Nations. The Global Forest Goals Report 2021; United Nations: New York, NY, USA, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- OECD. OECD Core Set of Indicators for Environmental Performance Reviews: A Synthesis Report by the Group on the State of the Environment; Environment Monographs; OECD: Paris, France, 1993; Volume 83, p. 35. [Google Scholar]
- Hammond, A.; Adriansee, A.; Rodenburg, E.; Bryant, D.; Woodward, R. Environmental Indicators: A systematic Approach to Measuring and Reporting on Environmental Policy Performance in the Context of Sustainable Development; World Resources Institute: Washington, DC, USA, 1995; p. 43. [Google Scholar]
- Kazana, V.; Bonnieux, F.; Campos-Palacin, P.; Croitorou, L.; Gatto, P.; Kazaklis, A.; Merlo, M.; Paoli, J.C.; Zadnik, L. MEDMONT: Tools for Evaluating Investment in the Mountain Mediterranean Areas—An Integrated Framework for Sustainable Development; Final Report; EC DG-Research: Brussels, Belgium, 2015; p. 255. [Google Scholar]
- Kazana, V.; Kazaklis, A.; Merou, T.; Takos, I. Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Modelling for Impact Assessment in the Context of Sustainable Forest Management, A Greek Case Study. In EFI Proceedings; Palahi, M., Birot, Y., Bravo, F., Gorriz, E., Eds.; European Forest Institute: Joensuu, Finland, 2009; Volume 57, pp. 175–184. [Google Scholar]
- Brändli, U.-B.; Brändli, R. Swiss NFI Cockpit—Forest Indicator Trends; Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL: Birmensdorf, Switzerland, 2015; Available online: http://www.lfi.ch/publikationen/publ/NFIcockpit-en.php. (accessed on 5 May 2021).
- Gough, A.D.; Innes, J.L.; Allen, S.D. Development of common indicators of sustainable forest management. Ecol. Indic. 2008, 8, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linser, S.; O’Hara, P. Guidelines for the Development of a Criteria and Indicator Set for Sustainable Forest Management; ECE/TIM/DP/73; United Nations: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019; ISBN 978-92-1-117190-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Linser, S.; Lier, M. The contribution of sustainable development goals and forest-related indicators to national bioeconomy progress monitoring. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- MCPFE. Third Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe; Report on SFM in Europe; MCPFE Liaison Unit: Lisbon, Portugal, 1998. [Google Scholar]
- Wolfslehner, B. The Use of Indicator Models for the Evaluation of Sustainable Forest Management in a Multi-Criteria Analysis Framework. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria, 2007; p. 98. [Google Scholar]
- MacDicken, K.; Sola, P.; Hall, J.; Sabogal, C. Global progress toward sustainable forest management. For. Ecol. Manag. 2015, 352, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Pan-European Criteria for SFM | |
---|---|
Criterion 1 | Maintenance and appropriate enhancement of forest resources and their contribution to global carbon cycles |
Criterion 2 | Maintenance of forest ecosystem health and vitality |
Criterion 3 | Maintenance and encouragement of productive functions of forests (wood and non-wood) |
Criterion 4 | Maintenance, conservation, and appropriate enhancement of biological diversity in forest ecosystems |
Criterion 5 | Maintenance and appropriate enhancement of protective functions in forest management (notably soil and water) |
Criterion 6 | Maintenance of other socioeconomic functions and conditions |
Color Coding | Categories | Number of Forest Europe Signatory Countries and Their International Country Codes | Share of Pan-European Forest Cover |
---|---|---|---|
Dark green | National set of SFM indicators existing and at least partly based on the pan-European C&I | 23 (AL, AT, BY, BE (Wallonia), CH, CY, CZ, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, GE, GR, IE, IT, LV, ME, NO, PT, SI, SK, TR) | 13.7% |
Medium green | National set of SFM indicators existing, but not based on pan-European C&I | 1 (RU) | 78.1% |
Light green | National set of SFM indicators under development | 2 (IS, RS) | 0.3% |
Yellow | National set of SFM indicators planned | 4 (BA, LT, PL, RO) | 2.0% |
Orange | National set of SFM indicators not existing/ not intended | 11 (BG, DE, GB, HR, HU, LI, LU, MT, NL, SE, UA) | 5.8% |
Grey | No reply to the survey received | 5 (AD, MC, MD, MK, VA) | 0.1% |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Linser, S.; Wolfslehner, B. National Implementation of the Forest Europe Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management. Forests 2022, 13, 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020191
Linser S, Wolfslehner B. National Implementation of the Forest Europe Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management. Forests. 2022; 13(2):191. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020191
Chicago/Turabian StyleLinser, Stefanie, and Bernhard Wolfslehner. 2022. "National Implementation of the Forest Europe Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management" Forests 13, no. 2: 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020191
APA StyleLinser, S., & Wolfslehner, B. (2022). National Implementation of the Forest Europe Indicators for Sustainable Forest Management. Forests, 13(2), 191. https://doi.org/10.3390/f13020191