Next Article in Journal
Experimental Analysis of Cool Traditional Solar Shading Systems for Residential Buildings
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of a Mild Sub-Critical Hydrothermal Carbonization Pretreatment on Umbila Wood. A Mass and Energy Balance Perspective
Open AccessArticle

Estimation of CO2 Transport Costs in South Korea Using a Techno-Economic Model

Offshore CCS Research Unit, Korea Research Institute of Ships and Ocean Engineering, 32 1312 Beon-gil, Yuseong-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-343, Korea
Division of Ocean Systems Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 291 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-701, Korea
Ocean Science & Technology School, Korea Maritime and Ocean University, 727 Taejong-ro, Youngdo-gu, Busan 606-791, Korea
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Peter G. Taylor
Energies 2015, 8(3), 2176-2196;
Received: 16 December 2014 / Revised: 5 March 2015 / Accepted: 16 March 2015 / Published: 19 March 2015
In this study, a techno–economic model was used to calculate the costs of CO2 transport and specify the major equipment required for transport in order to demonstrate and implement CO2 sequestration in the offshore sediments of South Korea. First, three different carbon capture and storage demonstration scenarios were set up involving the use of three CO2 capture plants and one offshore storage site. Each transport scenario considered both the pipeline transport and ship transport options. The temperature and pressure conditions of CO2 in each transport stage were determined from engineering and economic viewpoints, and the corresponding specifications and equipment costs were calculated. The transport costs for a 1 MtCO2/year transport rate were estimated to be US$33/tCO2 and US$28/tCO2 for a pipeline transport of ~530 km and ship transport of ~724 km, respectively. Through the economies of scale effect, the pipeline and ship transport costs for a transport rate of 3 MtCO2/year were reduced to approximately US$21/tCO2 and US$23/tCO2, respectively. A CO2 hub terminal did not significantly reduce the cost because of the short distance from the hub to the storage site and the small number of captured sources. View Full-Text
Keywords: carbon capture and storage; CO2 transport; cost; scale effect carbon capture and storage; CO2 transport; cost; scale effect
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Kang, K.; Seo, Y.; Chang, D.; Kang, S.-G.; Huh, C. Estimation of CO2 Transport Costs in South Korea Using a Techno-Economic Model. Energies 2015, 8, 2176-2196.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop