You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Energies
  • Correction
  • Open Access

18 July 2024

Correction: Algayyim et al. Sugarcane Biomass as a Source of Biofuel for Internal Combustion Engines (Ethanol and Acetone-Butanol-Ethanol): A Review of Economic Challenges. Energies 2022, 15, 8644

,
,
,
,
,
and
1
School of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
2
Al-Diwaniyah Water Department, Al-Diwaniyah Governorate, Al-Diwaniyah 58001, Iraq
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Al-Qadisiyah, Al-Diwaniyah 58001, Iraq
4
School of Engineering and Technology, Central Queensland University, Brisbane, QLD 4008, Australia
In the original publication [1], there was an error. The original article had incorrectly included the following article in the reference list: [84] “[Vickers, N.J. Animal Communication: When I’m Calling You, Will You Answer Too? Curr. Biol. 2017, 27, R713–R715]”. The intended reference for that statement should be [84] “[Adsul, M.; Sandhu, S.K.; Sinhania, R.R.; Gupta, R.; Puri, S.K.; Mathur, A. Designing a cellulolytic enzyme cocktail for the efficient and economical conversion of lignocellulosic biomass to biofuels. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2020, 133, 109442]”.
A correction has been made to 9. Economic Challenges, Paragraph 1 as follows:
Biofuel production from sugarcane waste has some challenging factors. One obstacle is the high cost of the enzymatic hydrolysis process [46] that is used for biofuel production. In addition, another challenge is the low yield produced after fermentation. Carpio and Souza [83] evaluated biofuel production from second-generation bagasse using different market prices and bagasse allocation scenarios. The results analysis showed that the bagasse allocation to second generation ethanol increases with the reduction of its production costs. They also showed that second-generation ethanol production costs 0.30 USD/L. Several researchers have evaluated and analysed the traditional processing approaches used to reach the desired reduction in second-generation biofuel production costs. For example, using enzymatic cocktails for hydrolysis is one of the most critical steps in terms of processing cost reduction [84]. Prajapati et al. [85] produced high hydrolysis efficiency with 74.9% from cellulase and hemicellulose using novel technics.
The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Algayyim, S.J.M.; Yusaf, T.; Hamza, N.H.; Wandel, A.P.; Fattah, I.M.R.; Laimon, M.; Rahman, S.M.A. Sugarcane Biomass as a Source of Biofuel for Internal Combustion Engines (Ethanol and Acetone-Butanol-Ethanol): A Review of Economic Challenges. Energies 2022, 15, 8644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.