Susceptibility Issues of Control Instrumentation in Electromagnetic Environment of High Current Laboratory
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Repetitive Damped Oscillatory Waves
3. Measurement of Transient Fields Due to Closing of the MV Circuit Breaker
- free space electric field sensor SFE3-5G with bandwidth from 100 kHz to 3.5 GHz,
- free space magnetic field sensor SFM2G with bandwidth from 100 kHz to 2 GHz,
- Digital oscilloscope WAVESURFER 3074 with 750 MHz analog bandwidth and 4 GS/s sampling rate, product of TELEDYNE LeCroy.
4. MV Circuit Breaker Tests in Stand-Alone Operation
- 9 V DC,
- 15 kV, 50 Hz.
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- KATKT10008. Vacuum Circuit Breaker Evolis 24 kV. 2004. Available online: http://www.schneider-electric.pl (accessed on 20 March 2022).
- Sadura, J.; Sroka, J.; Owsiński, M.; Jóśko, A. Identification of EM disturbances interfering the time-phase controller by short circuit tests. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility—EMC EUROPE, Rome, Italy, 23–25 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
- IEC 61000-6-5; Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)—Part 6–5: Generic Standards—Immunity for Equipment Used in Power Station and Substation Environments. IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
- IEC 61000-4-18; Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)—Part 4–18: Testing and Measurement Techniques—Damped Oscillatory Wave Immunity Test. IEC: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019.
- Burger, D.; Tenbohlen, S.; Köhler, W.; Ebbinghaus, W. Sources of transient electromagnetic disturbance in medim voltage switchgear. In Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility, York, UK, 26–30 September 2011; pp. 597–602. [Google Scholar]
- WG C4.208; EMC within Power Plants and Substations. CIGRE: Paris, France, 2013; ISBN 978-2-85873-229-6.
- Imposimato, C.; Hoeffelman, J.; Eriksson, A.; Siew, W.; Pretorius, P.; Wong, P. EMI Characterization of HVAC Substations—Updated data and Influence on Immunity Assessment; CIGRE: Paris, France, 2002; pp. 36–108. [Google Scholar]
- Cangemi, G.; Cataliotti, A.; Cipriani, G.; Di Dio, V.; Nucio, S.; Di Cara, D.; Tin, G.; Melodia, M. Experimental EMF Characterization of a Secondary Substation. In Proceedings of the AEIT Annual Conference, Naples, Italy, 14–16 October 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Meng, Y.; Zhang, B.; Shen, W.; Wang, S.; Ma, Y. Overvoltage of secondary cables in substation due to short circuit fault. In Proceedings of the Electromagnetic Compatibility and 2018 IEEE Asia-Pacific Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC/APEMC), Singapore, 14–18 May 2018; pp. 1099–1102. [Google Scholar]
- Sadura, J.; Sroka, J.; Owsiński, M. Rough identification of EM disturbances interfering the time-phase controller by the short circuit tests. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Electrical Power Quality and Utilisation (EPQU’20), Kraków, Poland, 14–15 September 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Ott, H.W. Noise Reduction Techniques in Electronic Systems; John Willey & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1988. [Google Scholar]
- Paul, C.R. Introduction to Electromagnetic Compatibility; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1992. [Google Scholar]
- Starzyński, J.; Sroka, J. Improved Simulation Model of Electrical Breakdown in Air. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 20th International Conference on Computational Problems of Electrical Engineering (CPEE), Lviv-Slavske, Ukraine, 15–18 September 2019; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Kawamata, K.; Minegishi, S.; Haga, A.; Sato, R. Measurement Method Using Coupled Transmission Lines for Voltage Transients on the Distribution Line. Electr. Eng. Jpn. 1995, 115, 563–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]




















| K | n | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.12 | 2.45 | 49.8 ns | 1 MHz | 3.77 µs |
| Field Component | Signal at | Signal at | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| the Low Voltage Transformer Port | the Controller Input | ||||
| 100 ms | The First Stage | The Second Stage | The First Stage | The Second Stage | |
| - | - | - | - | ||
| [V] | [V] | [V] | [V] | [V] | |
| vertical | 208.31 | >1400 | 294.11 | >8 | 0.249 |
| perpendicular | 202.73 | >2468 | 348.55 | 10.23 | 0.425 |
| along | 194.92 | >2800 | 313.20 | 9.54 | 0.212 |
| Field Component | Launching the First Interference, Referred to 0-Crossing [ms] | Dwell Time of the First Interference [ms] | Time Delay between the First and the Second Interference [ms] | Dwell Time of the Second Interference [ms] |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vertical | 3.562 | 0.333 | 0.82 | 0.308 |
| perpendicular | 2.498 | 0.284 | 0.743 | 0.379 |
| along | 6.579 | 0.326 | 0.869 | 0.3 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sadura, J.; Sroka, J.; Sul, P.; Jóśko, A.; Owsiński, M. Susceptibility Issues of Control Instrumentation in Electromagnetic Environment of High Current Laboratory. Energies 2022, 15, 4682. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134682
Sadura J, Sroka J, Sul P, Jóśko A, Owsiński M. Susceptibility Issues of Control Instrumentation in Electromagnetic Environment of High Current Laboratory. Energies. 2022; 15(13):4682. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134682
Chicago/Turabian StyleSadura, Jolanta, Jan Sroka, Przemysław Sul, Adam Jóśko, and Maciej Owsiński. 2022. "Susceptibility Issues of Control Instrumentation in Electromagnetic Environment of High Current Laboratory" Energies 15, no. 13: 4682. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134682
APA StyleSadura, J., Sroka, J., Sul, P., Jóśko, A., & Owsiński, M. (2022). Susceptibility Issues of Control Instrumentation in Electromagnetic Environment of High Current Laboratory. Energies, 15(13), 4682. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15134682

