Next Article in Journal
Chronic L-Name-Treatment Produces Hypertension by Different Mechanisms in Peripheral Tissues and Brain: Role of Central eNOS
Previous Article in Journal
Systemic Action of Inflammatory Mediators in Patients with Essential Hypertension and Diastolic Chronic Heart Failure: A Clinical Pathophysiological Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Why We Still Need Reliable Animal Models

Institute of Normal and Pathological Physiology, Centre of Experimental Medicine, Slovak Academy of Sciences, 813 71 Bratislava, Slovakia
President of the International Society for Pathophysiology (ISP).
Pathophysiology 2020, 27(1), 44-45; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathophysiology27010006
Submission received: 11 December 2020 / Accepted: 11 December 2020 / Published: 14 December 2020
Animal models are still an essential tool for identifying key molecular mechanisms and pathophysiological manifestations of different diseases, as well as for the analysis of the most effective intervention for the treatment and reduction of the consequences of pathophysiological conditions. Their use is profoundly important for a thorough demonstration of the effectiveness and safety of drugs and obtaining basic information on the route of administration, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. However, each model system has different specific limitations and disadvantages, which may be the reason why no animal model has fully reproduced all the key features of the severe form of COVID-19 yet. This deficit in preclinical modelling is very serious, as vaccines are not yet widely available and their use will be accompanied by several limitations.
Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify potential treatment for patients who have already experienced SARS-CoV-2 infection and are at risk of progressing to severe COVID-19. Significant evidence of the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions to prevent or promote regression of severe COVID-19 may be an improvement of clinically relevant endpoints in biomodels that are as close as possible to the consequences of COVID-19. Clinical signs of COVID-19 range from mild to critical, with individuals with a mild form of the disease showing no signs, or mild pneumonia only. The severe disease is characterized by moderate to severe pneumonia. A critical form of COVID-19 includes the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), septic shock, and multiple organ failure. Risk factors, including older age, male gender, obesity, diabetes, and immunodeficiency, predispose people to the development of severe or critical forms of COVID-19 [1,2].
Histological analysis, surface visual inspection, and radiological imaging were the predominant approaches used to assess the development of inflammation and lung damage after experimental SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, these pathological observations have so far only been documented in some experimental animals. This is probably due to the focus of studies on early viral infection and its transmission. However, for rigorous drug efficacy studies, it is important that disease-relevant clinical signs can be measured in such a way that the effects of potential therapeutics on the consequences of COVID-19 can be statistically determined. This is why it is important to develop a relevant biomodel for monitoring the consequences of COVID-19. Previous studies for the in vivo monitoring of COVID-19 infection have been described in macaques [3], cats [4], ferrets [5], hamsters [6], mink [7], and transgenic mice that express human angiotensin I converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). These models have been used successfully for transmission and immunity studies, but only partially simulate the mechanisms involved in the consequences of COVID-19 [8]. The biggest limitation in the ACE2 transgenic mouse model is its lethal effects caused by neuroinvasion affecting the central nervous system [9,10].
In addition, many laboratories prefer to use a rat model for testing, which does not require the equipment of larger animals, and compared to mice, rat models are better adapted to simulate human diseases, apart from transgenic mice. Although there is not yet a relevant rat model for monitoring the consequences of severe COVID-19, there is a relatively good basis of biomodels, including spontaneously hypertensive, obese, diabetic, or immunodeficient rats, in which appropriate intervention can induce ARDS-like lung damage. The development of a rat model for monitoring the consequences of COVID-19 would bring new possibilities for monitoring drugs and substances that have the potential to treat COVID-19. Future studies are needed to standardize the relevant rat model of COVID-19 and protocols to allow comparisons of different drug candidate interventions.
We would like to invite all scientists and clinicians to send in their experimental and review articles devoted to the research of pathophysiological mechanisms of diseases, including COVID-19, on animal models to Pathophysiology [11], the flagship journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology (ISP) [12].

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Xie, P.; Ma, W.; Tang, H.; Liu, D. Severe COVID-19: A Review of Recent Progress With a Look Toward the Future. Front. Public Health 2020, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Henry, B.M.; De Oliveira, M.H.S.; Benoit, S.; Plebani, M.; Lippi, G. Hematologic, biochemical and immune biomarker abnormalities associated with severe illness and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A meta-analysis. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2020, 58, 1021–1028. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  3. Munster, V.; Feldmann, F.; Williamson, B.N.; Van Doremalen, N.; Pérez-Pérez, L.; Schulz, J.; Meade-White, K.; Okumura, A.; Callison, J.; Brumbaugh, B.; et al. Respiratory disease in rhesus macaques inoculated with SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Cell Biol. 2020, 585, 268–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Shi, J.; Wen, Z.; Zhong, G.; Yang, H.; Wang, C.; Huang, B.; Liu, R.; He, X.; Shuai, L.; Sun, Z.; et al. Susceptibility of ferrets, cats, dogs, and other domesticated animals to SARS–coronavirus 2. Science 2020, 368, 1016–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Richard, M.; Kok, A.; De Meulder, D.; Bestebroer, T.M.; Lamers, M.M.; Okba, N.M.A.; Van Vlissingen, M.F.; Rockx, B.; Haagmans, B.L.; Koopmans, M.; et al. SARS-CoV-2 is transmitted via contact and via the air between ferrets. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Chan, J.F.-W.; Zhang, A.J.; Yuan, S.; Poon, V.K.-M.; Chan, C.C.-S.; Lee, A.C.-Y.; Chan, W.-M.; Fan, Z.; Tsoi, H.-W.; Wen, L.; et al. Simulation of the Clinical and Pathological Manifestations of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in a Golden Syrian Hamster Model: Implications for Disease Pathogenesis and Transmissibility. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Gillim-Ross, L.; Taylor, J.; Scholl, D.R.; Ridenour, J.; Masters, P.S.; Wentworth, D.E. Discovery of Novel Human and Animal Cells Infected by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus by Replication-Specific Multiplex Reverse Transcription-PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 3196–3206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Jiang, R.-D.; Liu, M.-Q.; Chen, Y.; Shan, C.; Zhou, Y.-W.; Shen, X.-R.; Li, Q.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, Y.; Si, H.-R.; et al. Pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 in Transgenic Mice Expressing Human Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2. Cell 2020, 182, 50–58.e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Kumar, S.; Yadav, P.K.; Srinivasan, R.; Perumal, N. Selection of animal models for COVID-19 research. VirusDisease 2020, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Muñoz-Fontela, C.; Dowling, W.E.; Funnell, S.G.P.; Gsell, P.-S.; Riveros-Balta, A.X.; Albrecht, R.A.; Andersen, H.; Baric, R.S.; Carroll, M.W.; Cavaleri, M.; et al. Animal models for COVID-19. Nat. Cell Biol. 2020, 586, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pathophysiology New Homepage. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/pathophysiology (accessed on 30 November 2020).
  12. International Society of Pathophysiology Homepage. Available online: https://ispweb.cc (accessed on 30 November 2020).
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pechanova, O. Why We Still Need Reliable Animal Models. Pathophysiology 2020, 27, 44-45. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathophysiology27010006

AMA Style

Pechanova O. Why We Still Need Reliable Animal Models. Pathophysiology. 2020; 27(1):44-45. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathophysiology27010006

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pechanova, Olga. 2020. "Why We Still Need Reliable Animal Models" Pathophysiology 27, no. 1: 44-45. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathophysiology27010006

APA Style

Pechanova, O. (2020). Why We Still Need Reliable Animal Models. Pathophysiology, 27(1), 44-45. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathophysiology27010006

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop