You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
Current Oncology
  • Article
  • Open Access

30 September 2024

The Experience of Patients with Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer: A Patient Journey Map Based on Qualitative Research

,
and
1
School of Nursing, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
2
Guangzhou Chest Hospital, Guangzhou 510095, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Abstract

(1) Background: While there is extensive documentation on the medical experience of breast cancer, a thorough understanding of the various stages of endocrine therapy remains insufficient. The aim of this study was to map the experiences and coping styles of breast cancer patients during endocrine therapy. (2) Methods: Qualitative research was conducted to gather insights into the experiences of breast cancer patients undergoing endocrine therapy. The themes were organized through content analysis and induction. Subsequently, patients were invited for face-to-face interviews at a top-three hospital in Guangzhou to supplement and validate the findings from the literature review. The patient journey was then mapped based on both the literature review and the semi-structured interviews. (3) Results: A total of 24 studies were included that described patients’ experiences and behaviors during the early, middle, and late stages of treatment, leading to the formation of a preliminary framework. Interviews were conducted with 20 patients, which confirmed and enriched the findings from the literature review. Based on these results, a stage trajectory for endocrine therapy in breast cancer was established. (4) Conclusions: The patient journey map developed in this study clearly and intuitively illustrates the thought and emotion matrix, as well as the behavior matrix, of breast cancer patients undergoing endocrine therapy. This provides a theoretical foundation for enhancing clinical services tailored to the needs of these patients.

1. Introduction

According to statistics, approximately 20 million new cancer cases were projected worldwide in 2020, with breast cancer accounting for about 11.7% of those cases. This represents a significant challenge to global health [1,2]. Hormone receptor-positive breast cancer is the most common subtype and carries a high risk of recurrence over an extended period. Adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) has been shown to significantly reduce mortality and recurrence risk among ER (+) patients [3,4]; however, it is often accompanied by side effects such as hot flashes and osteoporosis [5]. Previous studies have indicated that patients encounter difficulties in making the initial decision to undergo treatment and subsequently face challenges when adjusting to continue or discontinue treatment early. A woman’s ability, knowledge, and support in managing medication side effects can greatly influence adherence, as they often prioritize their quality of life [6,7].
In summary, the recurrence rate among ER (+) patients is high, necessitating attention to endocrine therapy. However, the long treatment duration, numerous side effects, significant individual differences, and the potential for various questions or psychological behavior changes make this a complex issue. Understanding the psychological and behavioral trends of these patients can aid in developing targeted care plans, ultimately improving the patient’s medical experience and self-management capabilities.
Qualitative studies provide a valuable approach to understanding the experiences and behaviors of breast cancer patients throughout their extended course of endocrine therapy. While numerous descriptive studies exist regarding the medical experiences of breast cancer patients, there is a notable lack of comprehensive literature addressing the various stages of endocrine therapy. The patient journey map, a patient-centered tool for visualizing patient experiences, has gained significant traction in patient management in recent years. Unlike other patient experience measurement tools, the patient journey map emphasizes patient interactions across different medical scenarios. By considering their feelings and behaviors in a holistic context, it enables healthcare professionals to accurately identify gaps in care and better understand patient needs, ultimately enhancing patient experience and self-management capabilities [8]. In light of this, the present study first conducted a systematic review of narrative studies involving patients undergoing endocrine therapy for breast cancer. Subsequently, patients were invited to participate in semi-structured interviews to validate and enrich the findings of the review. Based on the collected data, a comprehensive patient journey map was developed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Evidence Consolidation

2.1.1. Search Strategy

A comprehensive search was conducted across three databases: CNKI, PubMed, and Web of Science. The keywords employed in the search included “Breast Neoplasm”, “breast cancer”, “Breast Carcinoma”, “Endocrine therapy”, “hormonal treatment”, “Qualitative Research”, “Qualitative Study”, “Research, Qualitative”, “Qualitative Studies”, as well as “experience”, “challenge”, and “life”. The search period spans from the inception of the database up to 18 June 2024, with no restrictions on the search language.

2.1.2. Literature Selection Criteria

Two researchers independently selected the literature based on the following established criteria: (1) Inclusion Criteria: The subjects were female patients with a clinical diagnosis of breast cancer. This study reported the duration of endocrine therapy. The research focused on the experiences and challenges encountered during endocrine therapy. The study design was either qualitative or mixed methods. The article included first-person narrative accounts from patients. (2) Exclusion Criteria: Quantitative studies were excluded. Studies lacking access to qualitative results were not considered. Literature reviews and studies focusing on specific symptoms were also excluded.

2.1.3. Data Extraction and Data Analysis

Two researchers independently extracted pertinent information from the selected studies, encompassing the authors, publication year, research location, sample size, and sample characteristics. They synthesized the hierarchical themes and illustrative excerpts from interviews within the included research. The quality of the studies was evaluated using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP), while the credibility of the review evidence was assessed through the GRADE-CERQual framework. The CASP checklists focus on several critical aspects, including the clarity of the research question, the appropriateness of the research design, participant recruitment strategies, data collection methods, and the validity of the findings. In our assessment of confidence in the qualitative findings, we concentrated on four key components: methodological limitations, coherence, relevance, and data adequacy. To implement the CERQual approach, the researchers evaluated the methodological quality of the studies, assessed their relevance to the review question, analyzed the coherence of the findings, and determined the sufficiency of the available data [9,10]. In cases of disagreement between the researchers, they engaged in discussions to resolve the discrepancies or consulted a third researcher until a consensus was achieved.

2.2. Qualitative Interviews

2.2.1. Participant Selection and Interview Process

Between June 2024 and July 2024, breast cancer patients who met the following criteria were selected and interviewed at the Department of Breast Surgery in a Top Three hospital in Guangzhou using a convenience sampling method: (1) female patients, (2) diagnosed with primary breast cancer, (3) receiving endocrine therapy, (4) knowing their own disease, (5) voluntarily participating in the interview; Exclusion criteria: (1) previous or current mental illness; (2) severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency; (3) other serious chronic disease or cancer.

2.2.2. Data Collection

An interview outline was developed based on a comprehensive literature review and the objectives of the research. To refine the outline, 2–3 participants were engaged in pre-interviews. The finalized interview outline is presented in Table 1. Following consultations with the interview subjects, semi-structured interviews were conducted at suitable times in a natural and quiet environment to gather insights into the patients’ experiences and behaviors during endocrine therapy.
Table 1. Interview Guide.
Prior to the interviews, participants were informed about the study and provided their consent. During the interviews, care was taken to avoid interrupting or leading the interviewees in their responses, and the interview strategy was adjusted as needed based on the specific context. The sample size was determined according to the principle of information saturation, with interviews concluding when no new themes emerged from the analyzed data [11].

2.2.3. Data Analysis

Within 48 h after the interviews, two researchers collaboratively transcribed the text, read it independently, and refined the themes while ensuring that non-verbal expressions were not overlooked. Ultimately, they reviewed and refined the topics together, discussing any differences that arose or seeking assistance from a third researcher to aid in the analysis [12]. The data analysis methods utilized are outlined in Table 2.
Table 2. Process of thematic analysis.

3. Results

3.1. Review

A total of 226 articles were retrieved, of which 24 met the inclusion criteria and were selected for further analysis. The process of literature screening is illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Literature screening flowchart.
All the included papers were of medium and high quality. The basic characteristics of the paper are shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Basic Characteristics of the Included Literature.
Based on the data gathered from the included studies, the experiences of patients before, during, and after treatment were analyzed to identify significant themes at each stage, along with an evaluation of their confidence levels. The details of this analysis can be found in Table 4.
Table 4. Evidence Pooling and Confidence Assessment.

3.2. Interview

During the interview process, data saturation was approached after the 18th patient was interviewed. Following additional interviews with two more patients, it was concluded that no new themes emerged, resulting in a total of 20 patients being interviewed. The basic demographic data of the participants are presented in Table 5.
Table 5. Basic Participant Information.
The interview results revealed that patients had limited knowledge regarding endocrine therapy medications. During their treatment, they encountered challenges such as difficulty initiating the medication, adherence issues, and a fragile mentality. Cultural differences between China and the West may contribute to the fact that Chinese women often feel embarrassed discussing the adverse effects of these drugs on sexual health. The impact of drug side effects varies among patients, with many viewing exercise as an effective means to enhance their quality of life. Additionally, middle-aged and elder women tended to maintain a more positive attitude compared to younger women, and those with better treatment outcomes reported higher levels of self-efficacy. Overall, five categories were identified: (1) Initiating treatment while experiencing stress; (2) Limited understanding of endocrine therapy; (3) Feeling weak on the inside but unable to express it; (4) Self-management behaviors and their influencing factors; (5) Self-management challenges. Table 6 shows the details.
Table 6. Identified themes.

3.3. Patient Journey Map

Previous literature has documented the state of mind and feelings of patients before, as well as within 2 years, 5 years, and beyond 5 years after undergoing endocrine therapy. During the interviews, patients expressed their emotions prior to starting treatment and in the early stages of their therapy. They also shared effective self-management strategies, noting that adjusting their roles and responsibilities helped them navigate the challenges posed by their illness and treatment. Figure 2 shows the details.
Figure 2. Patient journey map.

4. Discussion

Before initiating treatment, patients often feel a sense of relief after having navigated the most challenging phase of their journey, having just completed primary treatment. However, they must then adjust their mindset, confront any initial trauma, and prepare for the next stage of their treatment. It is important to note that while endocrine therapy is generally less physically taxing than chemotherapy, patients remain highly sensitive and vulnerable. Many face significant challenges when beginning endocrine therapy, leading some to delay its initiation. During this phase, patients may experience a range of psychological changes, including relaxation, depression, worry, and a renewed determination to fight. Medical staff should be attentive to the psychological needs of patients during this stage. Providing a comprehensive explanation of endocrine therapy, alongside information support, is crucial. Ensuring that patients fully understand the necessity and significance of their treatment helps establish a strong belief in the process and encourages adherence to the treatment plan. This approach is vital not only for improving patient survival outcomes but also for enhancing their overall quality of life.
In the first year of treatment, patients often experience a sense of survival, hope, and post-traumatic growth, which enables them to maintain a resilient outlook [37]. However, as time progresses, the side effects of endocrine therapy begin to manifest, leading to a decline in patients’ treatment confidence. They may experience significant maladjustment, with previously established self-assurance gradually wavering, resulting in increased anxiety and uncertainty. At this stage, it is crucial to focus on psychological support and reinforcing treatment beliefs. Regular follow-ups should be maintained to monitor the patient’s treatment progress, and patients should be encouraged to communicate openly with their healthcare providers to address any concerns, thereby avoiding the temptation to discontinue treatment without guidance. Moreover, due to the lengthy nature of endocrine therapy, patients may inadvertently miss doses, making it essential to establish consistent medication habits and routines. Utilizing reminders such as SMS alerts or alarm clocks for timed medication can significantly help in this regard. It is evident that during the early stages of treatment, fostering a strong belief in the treatment process, maintaining follow-up care, and enhancing doctor–patient communication are particularly vital for patient well-being and adherence to therapy.
During the 2–5 years of treatment, patients enter a transitional phase that connects their previous experiences with future challenges, often marked by increased difficulties and susceptibility to negative emotions such as anxiety and worry. As they begin to recover, the pressure to reintegrate into their families and society can create additional stress in their work and personal lives, while the toxic effects and side effects of endocrine therapy impose further burdens on their daily experiences. Some patients find effective coping strategies for managing these side effects, which can lead to improved treatment adherence. However, those who lack adequate information or effective coping mechanisms may risk discontinuing therapy or passively enduring side effects, leading to a diminished quality of life. Trust in healthcare providers is also critical for maintaining adherence to treatment. Therefore, it is essential for healthcare professionals to cultivate a trusting relationship with patients, ensure consistent follow-up and communication, provide robust information support, strengthen patients’ belief in their treatment, and encourage them to seek support from family and friends during this pivotal stage.
In the later stages of treatment, patients may be approaching the conclusion of their therapy or may be informed that the duration of treatment needs to be extended. This news can evoke feelings of surprise, disappointment, and stress among patients. They are faced with the difficult decision of whether to persist with the treatment or to discontinue it prematurely. Healthcare providers play a crucial role at this juncture by providing patients with detailed information regarding the reasons for the treatment extension and carefully analyzing the associated pros and cons. Given that numerous factors influence a patient’s treatment decisions, it is essential to listen attentively to their genuine thoughts and feelings during this time. Offering encouragement and understanding can significantly impact their ability to cope with the situation and make informed choices about their treatment journey.
Numerous factors influence patient adherence throughout all stages of treatment, including treatment beliefs, side effects and associated risks, self-management strategies, social support, information support, effective communication, follow-up care, trust in healthcare providers, and various sociodemographic factors such as age, marital status, family responsibilities, cultural background, beliefs, and personality traits, which can inform personalized care. A literature review and patient interviews revealed that those taking tamoxifen often experience more severe side effects, including hot flashes, depression, insomnia, and other perimenopausal symptoms, while patients on aromatase inhibitors frequently report muscle and joint discomfort. Effective coping strategies identified by patients include regular exercise, substance therapy, relaxation techniques, and the use of calcium supplements, probiotics, and lubricants to mitigate adverse reactions; in cases where patients struggle significantly, they reach out to their doctors for assistance. The long duration of endocrine treatment and the heavy symptom burden faced by patients highlight the importance of establishing a strong professional image among medical staff and maintaining active communication with patients. Understanding the psychological characteristics and behavioral patterns of patients during different treatment phases is crucial for providing relevant information support, empowering patients to effectively manage the toxic side effects of treatment, and enhancing their treatment belief, self-efficacy, and self-management abilities.
Through this study, the psychological processes of patients at different treatment stages can be preliminarily integrated, and the psychological and behavioral changes experienced during endocrine therapy can be visually represented through the patient journey map. However, due to the wide range of disease stages addressed in the included studies, the duration of endocrine therapy reported by some studies was not sufficiently clear, limiting the exploration of patients’ psychological and behavioral trends in greater detail. Additionally, the lack of diversity among the interviewees may result in biased findings. It is hoped that future research will address these limitations to validate and enhance the conclusions of this study.

5. Conclusions

This study systematically reviewed the treatment experience of patients with breast cancer who received endocrine therapy, enriched and validated the literature review results through face-to-face patient interviews. The results suggest that the behavior, emotions and psychological feelings of patients will have subtle changes and different problems before the start of treatment and at different treatment stages. Therefore, in the process of nursing this population, we should be fully aware that endocrine therapy is a long and difficult process, and we should make corresponding assessments in different treatment processes, focusing on prominent stage problems, and aiming to solve the physical and mental troubles of patients.

Author Contributions

All authors were involved in the study design and writing the paper. Y.Y., T.H. and X.T. collaborated in literature screening, data extraction, and analysis. X.T. reviewed the article and put forward valuable suggestions. Face-to-face interview data were collected by Y.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Medical Teaching and Education Management Reform Research Project at Jinan University [grant number:2021YXJG033], Teaching Quality and Teaching Reform Project of Jinan University [grant number:JG2022025], Undergraduate University Teaching Quality and Teaching Reform Project Construction Project of Guangdong Province in 2022.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Jinan University (protocol code HXJNYY-YXLL2022023), accessed on 26 October 2022.

Data Availability Statement

Due to the protection of patient privacy, interview recording data cannot be provided.

Acknowledgments

I would like to acknowledge all the patients who participated in the study, the resources provided by the Overseas Chinese Hospital, and all the personnel who made this study convenient.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Katsura, C.; Ogunmwonyi, I.; Kankam, H.K.; Saha, S. Breast cancer: Presentation, investigation and management. Br. J. Hosp. Med. 2022, 83, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F.; Bsc, M.F.B.; Me, J.F.; Soerjomataram, M.I.; et al. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Clancy, C.; Lynch, J.; Oconnor, P.; Dowling, M. Breast cancer patients’ experiences of adherence and persistence to oral endocrine therapy: A qualitative evidence synthesis. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2020, 44, 101706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Huppert, L.A.; Gumusay, O.; Idossa, D.; Rugo, H.S. Systemic therapy for hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative early stage and metastatic breast cancer. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2023, 73, 480–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cella, D.; Fallowfield, L.J. Recognition and management of treatment-related side effects for breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2008, 107, 167–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. AlOmeir, O.; Patel, N.; Donyai, P. Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy among breast cancer survivors: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of the qualitative literature using grounded theory. Support. Care Cancer 2020, 28, 5075–5084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cucciniello, L.; Garufi, G.; Di Rienzo, R.; Martinelli, C.; Pavone, G.; Giuliano, M.; Arpino, G.; Montemurro, F.; Del Mastro, L.; De Laurentiis, M.; et al. Estrogen deprivation effects of endocrine therapy in breast cancer patients: Incidence, management and outcome. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2023, 120, 102624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zong, X.; Wu, F.; Huang, Q.; Yang, R.; Yuan, C. Application of patient journey map based on patient experience in patient management. China Hosp. Manag. 2019, 44, 61–65. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  9. Treloar, C.; Champness, S.; Simpson, P.L.; Higginbotham, N. Critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research studies. Indian. J. Pediatr. 2000, 67, 347–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lewin, S.; Glenton, C.; Munthe-Kaas, H.; Carlsen, B.; Colvin, C.J.; Gülmezoglu, M.; Noyes, J.; Booth, A.; Garside, R.; Rashidian, A. Using qualitative evidence in decision making for health and social interventions: An approach to assess confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses (GRADE-CERQual). PLoS Med. 2015, 12, e1001895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sun, X. An empirical analysis of in-depth interview research methods. J. Xi’an Jiaotong Univ. (Soc. Sci. Ed.) 2012, 32, 101–106. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  12. Braun, V.; Clarke, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 2006, 3, 77–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Flanagan, J.; Tetler, D.; Winters, L.; Post, K.; Habin, K. The Experience of Initiating Oral Adjuvant Treatment for Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. Oncol. Nurs. Forum 2016, 43, E143–E152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Toivonen, K.I.; Oberoi, D.; King-Shier, K.; Piedalue, K.-A.L.; Rash, J.A.; Carlson, L.E.; Campbell, T.S. Both “Vitamin L for Life” and “One Milligram of Satan”: A Multi-Perspective Qualitative Exploration of Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy Use after Breast Cancer. Curr. Oncol. 2021, 28, 2496–2515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Xu, L.; Wang, A. Health belief about adjuvant endocrine therapy in premenopausal breast cancer survivors: A qualitative study. Patient Prefer. Adherence 2019, 13, 1519–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Harrow, A.; Dryden, R.; McCowan, C.; Radley, A.; Parsons, M.; Thompson, A.M.; Wells, M. A hard pill to swallow: A qualitative study of women’s experiences of adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. BMJ Open 2014, 4, e0052856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Humphries, B.; Collins, S.; Guillaumie, L.; Lemieux, J.; Dionne, A.; Provencher, L.; Moisan, J.; Lauzier, S. Women’s Beliefs on Early Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Breast Cancer: A Theory-Based Qualitative Study to Guide the Development of Community Pharmacist Interventions. Pharmacy 2018, 6, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Karlsson, S.A.; Wallengren, C.; Olofsson Bagge, R.; Henoch, I. “It is not just any pill”-Women’s experiences of endocrine therapy after breast cancer surgery. Eur. J. Cancer Care 2019, 28, e130093SI. [Google Scholar]
  19. Bluethmann, S.M.; Murphy, C.C.; Tiro, J.A.; Mollica, M.A.; Vernon, S.W.; Bartholomew, L.K. Deconstructing Decisions to Initiate, Maintain, or Discontinue Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Mixed-Methods Study. Oncol. Nurs. Forum 2017, 44, E101–E110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moon, Z.; Moss-Morris, R.; Hunter, M.S.; Hughes, L.D. Understanding tamoxifen adherence in women with breast cancer: A qualitative study. British J. Health Psychol. 2017, 22, 978–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rooth, K.; Sundberg, K.; Gustavell, T.; Langius-Eklöf, A.; Gellerstedt, L. Symptoms and need for individualised support during the first year after primary treatment for breast cancer-A qualitative study. J. Clin. Nurs. 2024, 33, 2298–2308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Jacobs, J.M.; Walsh, E.A.; Park, E.R.; Berger, J.; Peppercorn, J.; Partridge, A.; Horick, N.; Safren, S.A.; Temel, J.S.; Greer, J.A. The Patient’s Voice: Adherence, Symptoms, and Distress Related to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy After Breast Cancer. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2020, 27, 687–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. van Londen, G.J.; Donovan, H.S.; Beckjord, E.B.; Cardy, A.L.; Bovbjerg, D.H.; Davidson, N.E.; Morse, J.Q.; Switzer, G.E.; Verdonck-de Leeuw, I.M.; Dew, M.A. Perspectives of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Survivors on Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy-Related Symptoms. Oncol. Nurs. Forum 2014, 41, 660–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pieters, H.C.; Green, E.; Khakshooy, S.; Sleven, M.; Stanton, A.L. A qualitative comparison of how older breast cancer survivors process treatment information regarding endocrine therapy. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e02109721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Eraso, Y.; Stefler, D.; Moon, Z.; Rossi, L.; Assefa, S. Extending Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for 10 Years: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Women’s Decision Making in an Online Breast Cancer Forum. Healthcare 2021, 9, 688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Brett, J.; Boulton, M.; Fenlon, D.; Hulbert-Williams, N.J.; Walter, F.M.; Donnelly, P.; Lavery, B.; Morgan, A.; Morris, C.; Watson, E.K. Adjuvant endocrine therapy after breast cancer: A qualitative study of factors associated with adherence. Patient Prefer. Adherence 2018, 12, 291–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yussof, I.; Mohamed Shah, N.; Ab Muin NF, I.; Abd Rahim, S.; Hatah, E.; Mohd Tahir, N.A.; Loganathan, K.; Munisamy, M. Challenges in Obtaining and Seeking Information Among Breast Cancer Survivors in an Asian Country: A Qualitative Study. J. Cancer Educ. 2024, 39, 383–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Gomaa, S.; Lopez, A.; Slamon, R.; Smith, R.; Lapitan, E.; Nightingale, G.; Miller, S.M.; Wen, K.-Y. The lived experience of patients with breast cancer on adjuvant endocrine therapy: Side effects and coping strategies during the first year of medication initiation. Support. Care Cancer 2023, 31, 71912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wickersham, K.; Happ, M.B.; Bender, C.M. “Keeping the Boogie Man Away”: Medication Self-Management among Women Receiving Anastrozole Therapy. Nurs. Res. Pract. 2012, 2012, 462121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wen, K.; Smith, R.; Padmanabhan, A.; Goldstein, L. Patient experience of taking adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer: A tough pill to swallow. Patient Exp. J. 2017, 4, 104–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Pellegrini, I.; Sarradon-Eck, A.; Ben Soussan, P.; Lacour, A.; Largillier, R.; Tallet, A.; Tarpin, C.; Julian-Reynier, C. Women’s perceptions and experience of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy account for their adherence: Breast cancer patients’ point of view. Psychooncology 2010, 19, 472–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Brauer, E.R.; Ganz, P.A.; Pieters, H.C. “Winging It”: How Older Breast Cancer Survivors Persist with Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment. J. Oncol. Pract. 2016, 12, e991–e1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Bourmaud, A.; Rousset, V.; Regnier-Denois, V.; Collard, O.; Jacquin, J.-P.; Merrouche, Y.; Lapoirie, J.; Tinquaut, F.; Lataillade, L.; Chauvin, F. Improving Adherence to Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Breast Cancer Through a Therapeutic Educational Approach: A Feasibility Study. Oncol. Nurs. Forum 2016, 43, E94–E103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Roche, N.; Le Provost, J.; Borinelli-Franzoi, M.-A.; Boinon, D.; Martin, E.; Menvielle, G.; Dumas, A.; Rivera, S.; Conversano, A.; Matias, M.; et al. Facing points of view: Representations on adjuvant endocrine therapy of premenopausal patients after breast cancer and their healthcare providers in France. The FOR-AD study. Eur. J. Oncol. Nurs. 2023, 62, 102259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Edwards, T.; Norcross, L.; Fine, J.; Martin, S.; Coulouvrat, C.; Spears, P.; Herold, C.I.; Ferrari, G.; Onwudiwe, N. Side effects and impacts of extended adjuvant endocrine therapy: A qualitative study among women with HR+/HER2-breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 41S, e12509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. AlOmeir, O.; Patel, N.; Donyai, P. Hobson’s choice or a horned dilemma: A grounded theory on adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy verified with breast cancer survivors. Support. Care Cancer 2022, 30, 10127–10136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Groarke, A.; Curtis, R.; Groarke, J.M.; Hogan, M.J.; Gibbons, A.; Kerin, M. Post-traumatic growth in breast cancer: How and when do distress and stress contribute? Psychooncology 2017, 26, 967–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.