Next Article in Journal
Feasibility of Assessing Patient Health Benefits and Incurred Costs Resulting from Early Dysphagia Intervention during and Immediately after Chemoradiotherapy for Head-and-Neck Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
Using Family History Forms in Pediatric Oncology to Identify Patients for Genetic Assessment
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Survivorship Care Plans for Breast Cancer Patients: Understanding the Quality of the Available Evidence

1
BC Cancer Agency–Vancouver Island Centre, Victoria, BC, Canada
2
School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2017, 24(6), 446-465; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3632
Submission received: 4 September 2017 / Revised: 3 October 2017 / Accepted: 6 November 2017 / Published: 1 December 2017

Abstract

Aim: The overall goal of the present study was to contribute to consistency in the provincial approach to survivorship care planning through knowledge synthesis and exchange. Our review focused on the research concerning the physical and emotional challenges of breast cancer (BCa) patients and survivors and the effects of the interventions that have been used for lessening those challenges. Methods: The psychosocial topics identified in BCa survivorship care plans created by two different initiatives in our province provided the platform for our search criteria: quality of life (QOL), sexual function, fatigue, and lifestyle behaviours. We conducted an umbrella review to retrieve the best possible evidence, and only reviews investigating the intended outcomes in BCa survivors and having moderate-to-high methodologic quality scores were included. Results: Of 486 reports retrieved, 51 reviews met the inclusion criteria and form part of the synthesis. Our results indicate that BCa patients and survivors experience numerous physical and emotional challenges and that interventions such as physical activity, psychoeducation, yoga, and mindfulness-based stress reduction are beneficial in alleviating those challenges. Conclusions: Our study findings support the existing survivorship care plans in our province with respect to the physical and emotional challenges that BCa survivors often face. However, the literature concerning cancer risks specific to BCa survivors is scant. Although systematic reviews are considered to be the “gold standard” in knowledge synthesis, our findings suggest that much remains to be done in the area of synthesis research to better guide practice in cancer survivorship.
Keywords: breast cancer; survivorship; survivorship care planning; psychosocial concerns breast cancer; survivorship; survivorship care planning; psychosocial concerns

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

D’Souza, V.; Daudt, H.; Kazanjian, A. Survivorship Care Plans for Breast Cancer Patients: Understanding the Quality of the Available Evidence. Curr. Oncol. 2017, 24, 446-465. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3632

AMA Style

D’Souza V, Daudt H, Kazanjian A. Survivorship Care Plans for Breast Cancer Patients: Understanding the Quality of the Available Evidence. Current Oncology. 2017; 24(6):446-465. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3632

Chicago/Turabian Style

D’Souza, V., H. Daudt, and A. Kazanjian. 2017. "Survivorship Care Plans for Breast Cancer Patients: Understanding the Quality of the Available Evidence" Current Oncology 24, no. 6: 446-465. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3632

APA Style

D’Souza, V., Daudt, H., & Kazanjian, A. (2017). Survivorship Care Plans for Breast Cancer Patients: Understanding the Quality of the Available Evidence. Current Oncology, 24(6), 446-465. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3632

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop