Next Article in Journal
Staging and Surgical Approaches in Gastric Cancer: A Clinical Practice Guideline
Previous Article in Journal
Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy in Breast Cancer: Use and Trends in Radiotherapy Practice
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of an Online, Patient-Centred Decision Aid for Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer in the Transoral Robotic Surgery Era

1
Department of Radiation Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
2
Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2017, 24(5), 318-323; https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3669
Submission received: 3 July 2017 / Revised: 7 August 2017 / Accepted: 4 September 2017 / Published: 1 October 2017

Abstract

Background: Radiotherapy (RT) has been the standard treatment for early oropharyngeal cancer, achieving excellent outcomes, but with significant toxicities. Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) has emerged as a promising alternative. A decision aid (DA) can help to establish patient treatment preferences. Methods: A DA was developed and piloted in 40 healthy adult volunteers. Assuming equal oncologic outcomes of the treatments, participants indicated their preference. The treatment trade-off point was then established, and participant perceptions were elicited. Results: More than 80% of participants initially selected TORS for treatment, regardless of facilitator background. For all participants, the treatment trade-off point changed after an average 15% cure benefit. Treatment toxicities, duration, novelty, and perceptions all influenced treatment selection. All subjects valued the DA. Conclusions: A DA developed for early oropharyngeal cancer treatment holds promise in the era of shared decision-making. Assuming equal cure rates, TORS was preferred over RT by healthy volunteers.
Keywords: oropharyngeal cancer; decision aids; shared decision-making; transoral robotic surgery; radiation therapy oropharyngeal cancer; decision aids; shared decision-making; transoral robotic surgery; radiation therapy

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lam, J.S.; Scott, G.M.; Palma, D.A.; Fung, K.; Louie, A.V. Development of an Online, Patient-Centred Decision Aid for Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer in the Transoral Robotic Surgery Era. Curr. Oncol. 2017, 24, 318-323. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3669

AMA Style

Lam JS, Scott GM, Palma DA, Fung K, Louie AV. Development of an Online, Patient-Centred Decision Aid for Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer in the Transoral Robotic Surgery Era. Current Oncology. 2017; 24(5):318-323. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3669

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lam, J. S., G. M. Scott, D. A. Palma, K. Fung, and A. V. Louie. 2017. "Development of an Online, Patient-Centred Decision Aid for Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer in the Transoral Robotic Surgery Era" Current Oncology 24, no. 5: 318-323. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3669

APA Style

Lam, J. S., Scott, G. M., Palma, D. A., Fung, K., & Louie, A. V. (2017). Development of an Online, Patient-Centred Decision Aid for Patients with Oropharyngeal Cancer in the Transoral Robotic Surgery Era. Current Oncology, 24(5), 318-323. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.24.3669

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop