Response to: Second-Line Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Wild-Type EGFR Status. What Is the Best Approach?
Excerpt
We thank Drs. Ibrahim Elghissassi, Saber Boutayeb, Hanane Inrhaoun, Hind Mrabti, and Hassan Errihani for their comments on our paper [...]
Share and Cite
Anh, M.K.; Kasymjanova, G.; Cohen, V.; Agulnik, J. Response to: Second-Line Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Wild-Type EGFR Status. What Is the Best Approach? Curr. Oncol. 2016, 23, 160-161. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.2955
Anh MK, Kasymjanova G, Cohen V, Agulnik J. Response to: Second-Line Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Wild-Type EGFR Status. What Is the Best Approach? Current Oncology. 2016; 23(2):160-161. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.2955
Chicago/Turabian StyleAnh, Ma Kim, Goulnar Kasymjanova, Victor Cohen, and Jason Agulnik. 2016. "Response to: Second-Line Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Wild-Type EGFR Status. What Is the Best Approach?" Current Oncology 23, no. 2: 160-161. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.2955
APA StyleAnh, M. K., Kasymjanova, G., Cohen, V., & Agulnik, J. (2016). Response to: Second-Line Treatment of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with Wild-Type EGFR Status. What Is the Best Approach? Current Oncology, 23(2), 160-161. https://doi.org/10.3747/co.23.2955