Next Article in Journal
Corrigendum: Progression-Free Survival in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Canadian Review and Expert Panel Perspective
Previous Article in Journal
Promoting Best Gynecologic Oncology Practice: A Role For The Society of Gynecologic Oncologists of Canada
 
 
Current Oncology is published by MDPI from Volume 28 Issue 1 (2021). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Multimed Inc..
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Intensity Modulated and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy Plans for Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Comparison of Their Sensitivity to Set-Up Errors and Uncertainties

1
Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Department of Medical Physics, and University of Calgary, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
2
Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
3
University of Calgary, Department of Oncology, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Oncol. 2006, 13(2), 61-66; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol13020005
Submission received: 4 January 2006 / Revised: 8 February 2006 / Accepted: 14 March 2006 / Published: 1 April 2006

Abstract

We compared the effect of set-up error and uncertainty on two radiation therapy treatment plans for head and neck cancer: one using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and one using conventional three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT). We used a Pinnacle3 (Philips Medical Systems, Markham, Ontario) system to create the two treatment plans (7-beam IMRT and 5-beam 3D-CRT) for the same volumetric data set, based on the objectives and constraints defined in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group H-0022 protocol. In both plans, the dose–volume constraints for the targets and the organs at risk (OARS) were met as closely as the beam geometries would allow. Monte Carlo–based simulations of set-up error and uncertainty were performed in three orthogonal directions for 840 simulated “courses of treatment” for each plan. A systematic error (chosen from distributions characterized by standard deviations ranging from 0 mm to 6 mm) and random uncertainties (2 mm standard deviation) were incorporated. We used a probability approach to compare the sensitivities of the IMRT and the 3D-CRT plans to set-up error and uncertainty in terms of equivalent uniform dose (EUD) to targets and OARS. Based on the EUD analysis, the targets and OARS showed considerably greater sensitivity to set-up error with the IMRT plan than with the 3D-CRT plan. For the IMRT plan, target EUDS were reduced by 4%, 7.5%, and 10% for 2-mm, 4-mm, and 6-mm set-up errors respectively. However, even with set-up error, the mandible, spinal cord, and parotid EUDS always remained lower with the IMRT plan than with the 3D-CRT plan. We conclude that, when quantified by EUD, IMRT plan doses to OARS and targets are more sensitive to set-up error than are 3D-CRT-plan doses. However, as judged by the differences between target and OAR doses, IMRT retains its superiority over 3D-CRT, even in the presence of set-up error.
Keywords: Equivalent uniform dose; set-up error; head-and-neck cancer; imrt; 3D-crt Equivalent uniform dose; set-up error; head-and-neck cancer; imrt; 3D-crt

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ploquin, N.; Lau, H.; Dunscombe, P. Intensity Modulated and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy Plans for Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Comparison of Their Sensitivity to Set-Up Errors and Uncertainties. Curr. Oncol. 2006, 13, 61-66. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol13020005

AMA Style

Ploquin N, Lau H, Dunscombe P. Intensity Modulated and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy Plans for Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Comparison of Their Sensitivity to Set-Up Errors and Uncertainties. Current Oncology. 2006; 13(2):61-66. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol13020005

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ploquin, N., H. Lau, and P. Dunscombe. 2006. "Intensity Modulated and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy Plans for Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Comparison of Their Sensitivity to Set-Up Errors and Uncertainties" Current Oncology 13, no. 2: 61-66. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol13020005

APA Style

Ploquin, N., Lau, H., & Dunscombe, P. (2006). Intensity Modulated and Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy Plans for Oropharyngeal Cancer: A Comparison of Their Sensitivity to Set-Up Errors and Uncertainties. Current Oncology, 13(2), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol13020005

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop