You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
MDPIMDPI
Search all articles
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Download PDF
  • Article
  • Open Access

8 April 2022

Association between Internalized Stigma and Depression among People Living with HIV in Thailand

,
,
,
,
,
,
and
1
Faculty of Nursing, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
2
Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
3
Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
4
Faculty of Nursing, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health2022, 19(8), 4471;https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19084471
Version Notes
Order Reprints
Review Reports

Abstract

Internalized stigma and depression are among the most common mental health problems in people living with HIV (PLHIV). This study aimed to examine the association between depression and overall internalized stigma, as well as different aspects of internalized stigma in PLHIV. The study included 400 PLHIV receiving care in Bangkok and Chiang Mai, Thailand. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman correlation coefficients. The results indicated the PLHIV with mild depression had lower median scores for the social relationship internalized stigma subscale than PLHIV with major depressive disorder (p = 0.009). Total HIV internalized stigma scores were significantly correlated with PHQ-9 scores in the mild depression group (r = 0.327, p = 0.004). Depression and internalized stigma were prevalent and associated, especially in the area of social relationships. Health personnel should be aware of possible depression in PLHIV who have internalized stigma. Intervention to promote understanding and social support for PLHIV is warranted.

1. Introduction

HIV/AIDS remains a major public health concern around the world. According to the Joint United Nations Program on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), there were approximately 1.5 million new HIV infections, 680,000 deaths, and 37.7 million people living with HIV (PLHIV) in 2020 [1]. UNAIDS set global targets to reach the 90-90-90 targets by 2020 given widespread access to highly effective antiretroviral medications. A recent assessment found that the targets were missed by a considerable margin, and HIV stigma was mentioned as one of the key obstacles [2,3,4].
Stigma is a Greek term denoting a mark that was burned or cut into the flesh of an unsavory character, traitor, criminal, or slave in ancient times [5]. In our modern scientific world, Erving Goffman’s definition of stigma is largely recognized. Stigma, according to Goffman, is an unfavorable social label that alters people’s perceptions of themselves and bars them from full social acceptance [6]. HIV stigma refers to society’s negative views and perceptions about people living with HIV. Lack of knowledge about HIV which led to fear of contracting HIV, negative social perceptions about HIV and PLHIV, and moral judgement toward PLHIV were cited as the drivers of HIV stigma [7].
Graham Scambler categorized stigma as ‘external’ and ‘internal’ [8]. In the HIV context, ‘external stigma’ refers to unfair treatment experienced by PLHIV from others, while ‘internal stigma’ (internalized stigma) refers to socially constructed views and negative stereotypes about HIV/AIDS which PLHIV have incorporated into their self-concept. Internalized stigma is made up of three steps: becoming aware of the stereotype, agreeing with it, and applying it to oneself [9]. In other words, internalized stigma is the loss of a person’s self-esteem or feeling of self-worth as a result of the individual’s belief that he or she is socially unacceptable.
Internalized stigma, which is the subject of this study, can be just as harmful as external stigma. Unlike external stigma, which requires more extensive intervention, internalized stigma can be self-managed. Internalized stigma has been linked to lower levels of HIV testing [10], late linkage to care and treatment [11], decreased treatment adherence [12], and lower levels of viral suppression among those on treatment [13].
Mental health problems are more common in PLHIV, with research showing that 28–62 percent of PLHIV having some form of mental illness [14] with depression the most common mental health issue among those living with HIV. A recent report on the global prevalence of depression in PLHIV compared six World Health Organization (WHO) regions and found that the South-East Asia region had the highest prevalence of depression (40%) [15]. In Thailand, one study documented that PLHIV had high depression mean scores (12.9 out of 15) [16].
Depression aggravates HIV infection in many ways; however, this can be difficult to diagnose in PLHIV because the signs and symptoms can be confounded with HIV illness symptoms. For example, weight loss, exhaustion, sleeplessness, and anorexia are all linked to both depression and HIV. As a result, depression in PLHIV is frequently undiagnosed and undertreated [17,18]. Adherence to antiretroviral medicine is also affected by depression, which can hasten the progression of HIV disease [19]. While depression among PLHIV has been extensively researched around the world, only a few studies have been conducted in Asian developing countries such as Thailand [20].
Several studies from Asia, Africa, Australia, the Caribbean, and the United States have shown a correlation between internalized stigma and depression among PLHIV [16,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. From a cognitive theory perspective, depression is defined by people’s dysfunctional negative beliefs about themselves, their life experience, their future, and the world in general [31], while internalized stigma entails accepting society’s negative attitudes and feelings regarding PLHIV and applying them to oneself [32]. These similarities could explain why depression has been linked to internalized stigma.
In Thailand, only one study has explored the relationship between internalized stigma and depression among PLHIV [16]. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2007 and found that internalized stigma was a predictor of depression after controlling for gender, age, income, and education. Because societal conditions have changed dramatically since the previous study, and a better measurement of internalized stigma among PLHIV has since been created, it is important for this topic to be revisited. The current study used a multidimensional measure of internalized HIV stigma [33] to describe levels of total internalized stigma as well as levels in internalized stigma subscales. The study also documented the prevalence of depression and investigated the connections between HIV internalized stigma and depression among Thai PLHIV.

2. Materials and Methods

Design: This study used a cross-sectional descriptive correlational design.

2.1. Study Participants and Setting

This study used data collected in Bangkok and in Chiang Mai, located in Northern Thailand. Four hundred participants were required to achieve a 95% confidence level and 5% precision, given an expected depression prevalence of 50% among PLHIV (Daniel, 1999). Inclusion criteria included HIV positive diagnosis and awareness of HIV positive diagnosis for one or more years, being 18 years or older, and receiving care at a government hospital. There were 400 participants in the study. Their demographic characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Participant characteristics.

2.2. Data Collection

Data collection took place at the antiretroviral clinics of participating hospitals. Researchers visited the clinics when PLHIV had appointments. First, clinic staff gave a brief introduction about the study to the PLHIV and those who showed interest were invited to meet with trained interviewers in a private room. The interviewers gave a more detailed explanation of the study, screened for eligibility, and conducted the informed consent process. Information was collected using face-to-face interviews technique.

2.3. Measures

  • A demographic questionnaire was developed by the research team for the Thai context and included questions on age, gender, marital status, religion, educational attainment, occupation, type of health insurance, family income, and sufficiency of income.
  • The Internalized HIV Stigma scale used in this study was developed by Sayles et, al. [28]. It was translated into Thai using Brislin’s back translation protocol. The measurement was comprised of 28 items categorized into four HIV internalized stigma subscales: (1) HIV stereotypes (12 items), (2) HIV disclosure concerns (five items), (3) Social relationship (seven items), and (4) Self-acceptance (four items). Responses for each item used a five-point categorical response scale (none of the time, a little of the time, some of the time, most of the time, or all of the time). Total mean scores were transformed linearly to a 0–100 range and described as total HIV internalized stigma score, with lower scores reflecting less perception and fewer experiences of internalized HIV stigma, and higher scores reflecting higher levels of stigma. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for this study was 0.92 for total HIV internalized stigma score, 0.90 for HIV stereotypes internalized stigma subscale, 0.93 for HIV disclosure internalized stigma concerns subscale, 0.89 for social relationship subscale, and 0.21 for self-acceptance subscale.
  • Depression was assessed using the PHQ-9 (Thai version). The PHQ-9 was comprised of nine items with each item rated from “0” (not at all) to “3” (nearly every day) and total scores ranging from 0 to 27. The total depression score was categorized into five categories: 0–4 = no depression, 5–8 = mild depression, 9–14 = major depressive disorder (mild or dysthymia), 15–19 = major depressive disorder (moderate), and ≥20 = major depressive disorder (severe). The instrument had satisfactory internal consistency with Cronbach’s alpha = 0.83.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used to describe participant demographics, HIV-related internalized stigma, and depression scores. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare HIV-related internalized stigma scores (total and four subscales) based on depression status. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to examine the correlation between total HIV-related internalized stigma score and depression score in participants who had some form of depression, namely mild depression (PHQ-9 score 5–8) and major depression (PHQ-9 score ≥ 9). Participants who did not have depression (PHQ-9 score 0–4) were not included in this correlational analysis.

2.5. Ethical Considerations

This study was approved by the Human Experimentation Committee at the Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University (Certificate number 24/2019). All participation was voluntary and written informed consent was obtained from each participant. Participants who were found to have major depressive disorder were referred to care appropriate to coverage provided by their respective health insurance schemes.

3. Results

Table 1 shows detailed demographic characteristics of the participants.
The median and IQR score of total internalized stigma score for all participants was 71.0 (60.2–80.8). Subscale scores were HIV stereotypes, median and IQR score of 31.0 (25.0–37.0); HIV disclosure concerns, median and IQR score of 14.0 (10.0–18.0); social relationship, median and IQR score of 14.0 (10.0–15.0); and self-acceptance, median and IQR score of 12.0 (11.0–14.0) (Table 2).
Table 2. Total HIV internalized stigma score and subscale scores by depression category.
Ninety-six participants (24.0%) could be defined as having depression. Of these, 74 (18.5%) had mild depression while 22 (5.5%) had major depressive disorder. Median scores of total HIV internalized stigma in the major depressive disorder group (78.0) was higher than the mild depression group (77.0) and the group without depression (67.0) (Table 2).
Comparisons of the total HIV internalized stigma score and the subscales using the Mann-Whitney U test showed the scores for social relationship internalized stigma subscale were significantly different (p < 0.01) between participants with mild depression (14.0) and those with major depressive disorder (18.0). However, no significant difference was found in the other comparisons (Table 3).
Table 3. Comparison of HIV internalized stigma scores between mild depression and major depressive disorder groups.
The Spearman correlation showed that total HIV internalized stigma scores were significantly correlated with PHQ-9 scores in the mild depression group (r = 0.327, p = 0.004). However, no correlation was found between total HIV internalized stigma scores and PHQ-9 scores of the major depressive disorder group (Table 4).
Table 4. Correlations between total HIV internalized stigma score and PHQ-9 score in the mild depression and major depressive disorder groups.

4. Discussion

Based on the PHQ-9, 24% of our participants were considered to be depressed, consistent with the range of 12.8–78% reported in a global systematic review [34], though our rate was lower than the 37.9% reported in another systematic review of depression in PLHIV in Ethiopia [35]. The prevalence of depression in this study was lower than the rate reported in other Thai studies. These included the prevalence studies in Thai adult PLHIV (32.2%) [36] and in Thai adolescents with vertically acquired HIV (39.3%) [37]. Differences in participant characteristics, dates of data collection, and the measurements employed could explain the variations in results.
Several research studies have indicated a link between internalized stigma and depression in PLHIV. The phenomenon was consistently found in general adults living with HIV [16,22,23,26,38], women living with HIV [21], older adults living with HIV (aged ≥ 50 years old) [24], and MSM [25]. However, these studies only examined overall internalized HIV stigma. The current study had the unique opportunity to investigate the link between different domains of internalized HIV stigma and depression, having received permission to use a scale that measured both overall HIV internalized stigma and different aspects of internalized stigma [33]. More specific results found in the study might aid healthcare professionals in developing a more targeted solution to address the issue.
In this study, an analysis was performed to determine if total internalized stigma and/or internalized stigma as represented in the four subscales differed between PLHIV with mild depression and those with major depressive disorder. Knowledge of potential differences is important, since major depressive disorder is a serious health issue that necessitates treatment. Only the median scores for the internalized stigma social relationship subscale had a significant difference, with the mild depression group scoring lower than the major depressive disorder group. This is a logical finding given the evidence that healthy social relationships are necessary for psychological well-being, particularly for PLHIV. For example, high levels of perceived social support were linked to lower levels of perceived HIV stigma [39], a precursor of internalized HIV stigma [40]. In a study of older adults living with HIV in Namibia, social support from friends had a significant negative relationship with symptoms of depression [41]. PLHIV with lower spirituality and participation in the religious community had more symptoms of depression than those with greater spirituality and religious participation [42]. Internalized stigma was also found to be influenced by how PLHIV viewed their social position. In a study among women living with HIV in the United States, internalized HIV stigma was negatively linked with greater neighborhood racial diversity, while internalized HIV stigma was positively associated with higher neighborhood household income [43].
Total internalized HIV stigma scores were positively associated with PHQ-9 scores in the mild depression group, but this was not true for the major depressive disorder group. In other words, an incrementally increased level of depression was linked to a higher likelihood of internalized stigma among our participants. The reason why this correlation was not found in the major depressive disorder group should be further examined. The small sample size of this study may explain the differing findings between the two groups.
The findings from this study highlighted the need to reduce internalized stigma, particularly among PLHIV with mild depression, in the hopes of averting a more serious condition. Interventions should promote social support among PLHIV, as perceived social support was linked to less stigma and depressed symptoms in this population [44]. To promote understanding and social support for PLHIV, community action to reduce HIV stigma is required. According to a study conducted in Thailand, community mobilization activities, which included monthly campaigns, funfairs, and information and educational materials helped to reduce HIV stigma at the community level [45]. A South African study also found that having a treatment buddy helped PLHIV participants feel less stigmatized [46]. From the PLHIV perspective, it was discovered that disclosing HIV status to one trusted family member was the first step in gaining more involvement and support from others [47]. In an African study, youth living with HIV whose friends and family members continued to socialize with them after disclosure of their HIV status had higher levels of perceived social support [48]. Another study from Africa also found that Disclosure of HIV status is associated with increased adherence to clinic visits [49]. The intervention, of course, is dependent on the individuals’ HIV disclosure status as well as the stigma experience in their specific environment.
This study’s strength was that it was the first in Thailand to examine HIV internalized stigma in PLHIV at the subscale level. This study showed that having more severe depression increased the likelihood of internalized stigma for social relationships, while having mild depression increased risk of overall internalized stigma among PLHIV. The relatively poor socio-economic status of the participants might play an important role in these findings. Some limitations included small sample size and the fact that participants were not chosen at random and represented a specific subgroup of PLHIV, specifically those receiving treatment from government programs. Additionally, the major depressive disorder group was only represented by a small number of individuals, resulting in limited statistical power when calculating correlations for the total HIV internalized stigma score. Another disadvantage is that this study was cross-sectional, preventing the assessment of temporal correlations.
Recommendations for future study include studies with a larger sample size and inclusion of participants with more diverse backgrounds. An interventional study to improve social relationships for PLHIV would be promising, as such an intervention would improve overall mental health while addressing internalized stigma.

5. Conclusions

Depression and internalized stigma were prevalent and associated with each other among Thai PLHIV who took part in this study, especially in the area of social relationships. Health personnel should be aware of possible depression in PLHIV who have internalized stigma. Intervention to promote understanding and social support for PLHIV is warranted.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.T., K.S., P.U., S.S., R.W. and A.T.; methodology, D.T., K.S., P.U., S.S., R.W. and A.T.; software, K.S. and P.S.; validation, D.T. and K.S.; formal analysis, K.S. and P.S.; investigation, D.T., K.S., P.U., S.S., R.W., A.T., S.W. and P.S.; resources, K.S. and A.T.; data curation, K.S. and P.S.; writing—original draft preparation, D.T. and K.S.; writing—review and editing, D.T., K.S., P.U., S.S., R.W., A.T., S.W. and P.S.; visualization, K.S. and P.S.; supervision, D.T., K.S. and P.U.; project administration, K.S. and A.T.; funding acquisition, K.S. and A.T. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was partially supported by Chiang Mai University.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Human Experimentation Committee at the Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University (Certificate number 24/2019).

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are openly available in FigShare at http://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.19333958 (accessed on 10 March 2022).

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Thai HCP who participated in this study. We also would like to thank the staff of the Provincial Health Offices in the study areas.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. UNAIDS. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS); UNAIDS: Geneva, Switzerland, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. Ekstrand, M.L.; Bharat, S.; Srinivasan, K. HIV stigma is a barrier to achieving 90-90-90 in India. Lancet HIV 2018, 5, e543–e545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mahy, M.I.; Sabin, K.M.; Feizzadeh, A.; Wanyeki, I. Progress towards 2020 global HIV impact and treatment targets. J. Int. AIDS Soc. 2021, 24 (Suppl. 5), e25779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Stover, J.; Glaubius, R.; Teng, Y.; Kelly, S.; Brown, T.; Hallett, T.B.; Revill, P.; Bärnighausen, T.; Phillips, A.N.; Fontaine, C.; et al. Modeling the epidemiological impact of the UNAIDS 2025 targets to end AIDS as a public health threat by 2030. PLoS Med. 2021, 18, e1003831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Harvey, R.D. Individual Differences in the Phenomenological Impact of Social Stigma. J. Soc. Psychol. 2001, 141, 174–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Goffman, E. Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity; Prentice Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, 1963. [Google Scholar]
  7. Fauk, N.K.; Hawke, K.; Mwanri, L.; Ward, P.R. Stigma and Discrimination towards People Living with HIV in the Context of Families, Communities, and Healthcare Settings: A Qualitative Study in Indonesia. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 5424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Scambler, G. Stigma and disease: Changing paradigms. Lancet 1998, 352, 1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Corrigan, P.W.; Larson, J.E.; Rüsch, N. Self-stigma and the “why try” effect: Impact on life goals and evidence-based practices. World Psychiatry 2009, 8, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Golub, S.A.; Gamarel, K.E. The impact of anticipated HIV stigma on delays in HIV testing behaviors: Findings from a commu-nity-based sample of men who have sex with men and transgender women in New York City. AIDS Patient Care STDS 2013, 27, 621–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sabapathy, K.; Mubekapi-Musadaidzwa, C.; Mulubwa, C.; Schaap, A.; Hoddinott, G.; Stangl, A.; Floyd, S.; Ayles, H.; Fidler, S.; Hayes, R.; et al. Predictors of timely link-age-to-ART within universal test and treat in the HPTN 071 (PopART) trial in Zambia and South Africa: Findings from a nested case-control study. J. Int. AIDS Soc. 2017, 20, e25037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Katz, I.; Ryu, A.E.; Onuegbu, A.G.; Psaros, C.; Weiser, S.D.; Bangsberg, D.R.; Tsai, A.C. Impact of HIV-related stigma on treatment adherence: Systematic review and meta-synthesis. J. Int. AIDS Soc. 2013, 16 (Suppl. 2), 18640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hargreaves, J.R.; Pliakas, T.; Hoddinott, G.; Mainga, T.; Mubekapi-Musadaidzwa, C.; Donnell, D.; Piwowar-Manning, E.; Agyei, Y.; Mandla, N.F.; Dunbar, R.; et al. HIV Stigma and Viral Sup-pression Among People Living With HIV in the Context of Universal Test and Treat: Analysis of Data From the HPTN 071 (PopART) Trial in Zambia and South Africa. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2020, 85, 561–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hoare, J.; Sevenoaks, T.; Mtukushe, B.; Williams, T.; Heany, S.; Phillips, N. Global Systematic Review of Common Mental Health Disorders in Adults Living with HIV. Curr. HIV/AIDS Rep. 2021, 18, 569–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Rezaei, S.; Ahmadi, S.; Rahmati, J.; Hosseinifard, H.; Dehnad, A.; Aryankhesal, A.; Shabaninejad, H.; Ghasemyani, S.; Alihosseini, S.; Bragazzi, N.; et al. Global prevalence of depression in HIV/AIDS: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Support. Palliat. Care 2019, 9, 404–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Li, L.; Lee, S.-J.; Thammawijaya, P.; Jiraphongsa, C.; Rotheram-Borus, M.J. Stigma, social support, and depression among people living with HIV in Thailand. AIDS Care 2009, 21, 1007–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fulk, L.J.; Kane, B.E.; Phillips, K.D.; Bopp, C.M.; Hand, G.A. Depression in HIV-infected patients: Allopathic, complementary, and alternative treatments. J. Psychosom. Res. 2004, 57, 339–351. [Google Scholar]
  18. Bhatia, M.S.; Munjal, S. Prevalence of Depression in People Living with HIV/AIDS Undergoing ART and Factors Associated with it. J. Clin. Diagn. Res. 2014, 8, WC01–WC04. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Elbadawi, A.; Mirghani, H. Depression among HIV/AIDS Sudanese patients: A cross-sectional analytic study. Pan. Afr. Med. J. 2017, 26, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Tran, B.X.; Ho, R.C.M.; Ho, C.S.H.; Latkin, C.A.; Phan, H.T.; Ha, G.H.; Vu, G.T.; Ying, J.; Zhang, M.W.B. Depression among Patients with HIV/AIDS: Research De-velopment and Effective Interventions (GAP(RESEARCH)). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Vyavaharkar, M.; Moneyham, L.; Corwin, S.; Saunders, R.; Annang, L.; Tavakoli, A. Relationships Between Stigma, Social Support, and Depression in HIV-Infected African American Women Living in the Rural Southeastern United States. J. Assoc. Nurses AIDS Care 2009, 21, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  22. Charles, B.; Jeyaseelan, L.; Pandian, A.K.; Sam, A.E.; Thenmozhi, M.; Jayaseelan, V. Association between stigma, depression and quality of life of people living with HIV/AIDS (PLHA) in South India—A community based cross sectional study. BMC Public Health 2012, 12, 463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kalomo, E.N. Associations between HIV-related stigma, self-esteem, social support, and depressive symptoms in Namibia. Aging Ment. Health 2018, 22, 1570–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kalomo, E.N.; Jun, J.S.; Lee, K.; Kaddu, M.N. HIV stigma, resilience and depressive symptoms among older adults living with HIV in rural Namibia. Afr. J. AIDS Res. 2020, 19, 198–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Meyers-Pantele, S.A.; Lammert, S.; Rendina, H.J.; Shalhav, O.; Talan, A.J.; Smith, L.R.; Pitpitan, E.V.; Horvath, K.J. Examining HIV Stigma, Depression, Stress, and Recent Stimulant Use in a Sample of Sexual Minority Men Living with HIV: An Application of the Stigma and Substance Use Process Model. AIDS Behav. 2021, 26, 138–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Simbayi, L.C.; Kalichman, S.; Strebel, A.; Cloete, A.; Henda, N.; Mqeketo, A. Internalized stigma, discrimination, and depression among men and women living with HIV/AIDS in Cape Town, South Africa. Soc. Sci. Med. 2007, 64, 1823–1831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Yigit, I.; Bayramoglu, Y.; Weiser, S.D.; Johnson, M.O.; Mugavero, M.J.; Turan, J.M.; Turan, B. Changes in Internalized Stigma and HIV Health Outcomes in Individuals New to HIV Care: The Mediating Roles of Depression and Treatment Self-Efficacy. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2020, 34, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Geibel, S.; Gottert, A.; Friedland, B.A.; Jeremiah, K.; McClair, T.L.; Mallouris, C.; Kentutsi, S.; Hows, J.; Sprague, L.; Pulerwitz, J. Internalized stigma among people living with HIV: Assessing the Internalized AIDS-Related Stigma Scale in four countries. AIDS 2020, 34 (Suppl. 1), S33–S41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bebell, L.M.; Kembabazi, A.; Musinguzi, N.; Martin, J.N.; Hunt, P.W.; Boum, Y., 2nd; O’Laughlin, K.N.; Muzoora, C.; Haberer, J.E.; Bwana, M.B.; et al. Internalized stigma, depressive symptoms, and the modifying role of antiretroviral therapy: A cohort study in rural Uganda. SSM Ment. Health 2021, 1, 100034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Heywood, W.; Lyons, A. HIV and Elevated Mental Health Problems: Diagnostic, Treatment, and Risk Patterns for Symptoms of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress in a National Community-Based Cohort of Gay Men Living with HIV. AIDS Behav. 2016, 20, 1632–1645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Beck, A.T.; Dozois, D.J. Cognitive Therapy: Current Status and Future Directions. Annu. Rev. Med. 2011, 62, 397–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Phillips, K.D.; Moneyham, L.; Tavakoli, A. Development of an Instrument to Measure Internalized Stigma in Those with HIV/AIDS. Issues Ment. Health Nurs. 2011, 32, 359–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Sayles, J.N.; Hays, R.D.; Sarkisian, C.A.; Mahajan, A.P.; Spritzer, K.L.; Cunningham, W.E. Development and Psychometric Assessment of a Multidimensional Measure of Internalized HIV Stigma in a Sample of HIV-positive Adults. AIDS Behav. 2008, 12, 748–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Uthman, O.A.; Magidson, J.F.; Safren, S.A.; Nachega, J.B. Depression and Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy in Low-, Middle- and High-Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr. HIV/AIDS Rep. 2014, 11, 291–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Amare, T.; Getinet, W.; Shumet, S.; Asrat, B. Prevalence and Associated Factors of Depression among PLHIV in Ethiopia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis, 2017. AIDS Res. Treat. 2018, 2018, 5462959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Buathong, N.; Hiransuthikul, N.; Tangwongchai, S.; Komoltri, C. Association between depression and adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy among adult HIV infectedpatients in Thailand. Asian Biomed. 2009, 3, 127–133. [Google Scholar]
  37. Lee, B.; Chhabra, M.; Oberdorfer, P. Depression among Vertically HIV-Infected Adolescents in Northern Thailand. J. Int. Assoc. Physicians AIDS Care 2011, 10, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Chan, B.T.; Pradeep, A.; Prasad, L.; Murugesan, V.; Chandrasekaran, E.; Kumarasamy, N.; Mayer, K.H.; Tsai, A.C. Association between internalized stigma and depression among HIV-positive persons entering into care in Southern India. J. Glob. Health 2017, 7, 020403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Galvan, F.H.; Davis, E.M.; Banks, D.; Bing, E.G. HIV Stigma and Social Support among African Americans. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2008, 22, 423–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Latalova, K.; Kamaradova, D.; Prasko, J. Perspectives on perceived stigma and self-stigma in adult male patients with depression. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2014, 10, 1399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Kalomo, E.N.; Jun, J.S.; Lee, K.H.; Kaddu, M.N. Depressive symptoms among older adults with HIV in Namibia: The role of social support and spirituality. Afr. J. AIDS Res. 2021, 20, 25–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Taggart, T.; Mayer, K.H.; Vermund, S.H.; Huang, S.; Hayashi, K.; Ransome, Y. Interaction of Religion/Spirituality With Internalized HIV Stigma, Depression, Alcohol Use, and Sexual Risk Among Black Men Who Have Sex With Men: The 6 City HPTN 061 Study. JAIDS J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2021, 87, e188–e197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Crockett, K.B.; Edmonds, A.; Johnson, M.O.; Neilands, T.B.; Kempf, M.-C.; Konkle-Parker, D.; Wingood, G.; Tien, P.C.; Cohen, M.; Wilson, T.E.; et al. Neighborhood Racial Diversity, Socioeconomic Status, and Perceptions of HIV-Related Discrimination and Internalized HIV Stigma Among Women Living with HIV in the United States. AIDS Patient Care STDs 2019, 33, 270–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rao, D.; Chen, W.-T.; Pearson, C.R.; Simoni, J.M.; Fredriksen-Goldsen, K.; Nelson, K.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, F. Social support mediates the relationship between HIV stigma and depression/quality of life among people living with HIV in Beijing, China. Int. J. STD AIDS 2012, 23, 481–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Jain, A.; Nuankaew, R.; Mongkholwiboolphol, N.; Banpabuth, A.; Tuvinun, R.; Na Ayuthaya, P.O.; Richter, K. Community-based interventions that work to reduce HIV stigma and discrimination: Results of an evaluation study in Thailand. J. Int. AIDS Soc. 2013, 16 (Suppl. 2), 18711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Masquillier, C.; Wouters, E.; Mortelmans, D.; Booysen, F.L.R. The Impact of Community Support Initiatives on the Stigma Experienced by People Living with HIV/AIDS in South Africa. AIDS Behav. 2015, 19, 214–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Maman, S.; Van Rooyen, H.; Groves, A.K. HIV status disclosure to families for social support in South Africa (NIMH Project Accept/HPTN 043). AIDS Care 2014, 26, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Lee, S.; Yamazaki, M.; Harris, D.R.; Harper, G.W.; Ellen, J. Social Support and Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Status Disclosure to Friends and Family: Implications for Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Youth. J. Adolesc. Health 2015, 57, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Izudi, J.; Okoboi, S.; Lwevola, P.; Kadengye, D.; Bajunirwe, F. Effect of disclosure of HIV status on patient representation and adherence to clinic visits in eastern Uganda: A propensity-score matched analysis. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0258745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Download PDF
Effects of Iron Powder Addition and Thermal Hydrolysis on Methane Production and the Archaeal Community during the Anaerobic Digestion of Sludge
Previous
Association between Increasing Social Capital and Decreasing Prevalence of Smoking at the Municipality Level: Repeated Cross-Sectional Study from the JAGES
Next