Next Article in Journal
The Impact of Demographic, Socio-Economic and Geographic Factors on Mortality Risk among People Living with Dementia in England (2002–2016)
Next Article in Special Issue
Estimating the Bioaccumulation Potential of Hydrophobic Ultraviolet Stabilizers Using Experimental Partitioning Properties
Previous Article in Journal
High Intensity Functional Training (HIFT) Improves Fitness in Recruit Firefighters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs): Occurrence and Fate in Aquatic Ecosystems

by
Paolo Pastorino
1,* and
Antoni Ginebreda
2
1
The Veterinary Medical Research Institute for Piemonte, Liguria and Valle d’Aosta, Via Bologna 148, 10154 Torino, Italy
2
Department of Environmental Chemistry, Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Studies (IDAEA-CSIC), Jordi Girona 18–26, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(24), 13401; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413401
Submission received: 9 December 2021 / Accepted: 14 December 2021 / Published: 20 December 2021
Contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) are typically divided into chemicals, as they are properly called, and biological CECs, such as pathogens [1]. CECs comprise a vast array of contaminants that have only recently appeared in water, or that are of recent concern because they have been detected at concentrations significantly higher than expected, and/or their risk to human and environmental health may not be fully understood [2,3]. CECs span natural and artificial chemical substances and their by-products, comprising pharmaceuticals, personal care products (PPCPs), flame retardants (FRs), pesticides, artificial sweeteners (ASWs), nanoparticles, microplastics and their transformation products, but also antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB), antibiotic resistant genes (ARG) and, more recently, the SARS-CoV-2 virus [4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15].
There are many CECs and PPCPs that act as so-called endocrine disruptors (EDCs) [16]. EDCs are compounds that alter the normal functions of hormones, resulting in a variety of health effects. EDCs can alter hormone levels, leading to reproductive effects in aquatic organisms, and evaluating these effects may require testing methodologies not typically available, along with endpoints not previously evaluated using current guidelines [17].
Another most serious risk for freshwater and marine ecosystems, and consequently human health, derives from the occurrence of pathogens (parasites and bacteria), especially ARB and ARGs, which are now widespread throughout the aquatic environment and pose a serious emerging risk for aquatic organisms (especially fish) and human health [18].
It is important to point out that the number of CECs is continuously evolving as new chemical compounds are produced, and improvements in chemical analysis increase our understanding of the effects of current and past contaminants on human and environmental health. Moreover, as the climate and environment change, humans, plants, and animals increasingly migrate, allowing disease-causing organisms of all kinds to find new areas and new hosts to live in. This leads to the frequent emergence of new diseases [19].
Introduction routes into the aquatic environment for CECs consist of point and non-point sources [20]. Major point sources include wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), industries and hospitals [21]. Regarding the level of persistence, some CECs pass unaltered through WWTPs, and therefore, they are released into different aquatic environments [22]. Many other CECs, though not persistent per se, owing to their continuous release into the environment, can be truly qualified as “pseudo-persistent”. Although CECs are ubiquitous and cause blanket exposure with chronic, subtle impacts on human and environmental health, little is known about their occurrence in both biotic and abiotic matrices; therefore, data are needed to assess the risks associated with their presence [23,24].
Biological assessment is crucial for measuring the ecological integrity of aquatic ecosystems and for protecting aquatic and human life. Aquatic organisms may transfer the contaminants that they bioaccumulate from water or sediment to the fish that forage on them, and then to the humans who consume the fish [25]. The extent to which these sediment-associated contaminants can move through the aquatic food chain, and thus potentially affect organisms at higher trophic levels, is critical for environmental decision-making [26].
CECs persist for long periods in sediments, where bottom-dwelling animals accumulate them and pass them up the food chain to fish [27]. CECs levels can increase as they move up the food chain, resulting in top predators in a food chain having levels several orders of magnitude higher than the water. CEC levels in fish tissues are also an important indicator of the health of waterbodies and the risk to human health from consuming fish [24].
It is well documented that CECs are susceptible to poor removal during the conventional WWTPs, which introduce them back into the environment at concentration levels ranging from ng/L (i.e., carbamazepine) up to mg/L (i.e., acesulfame). On this path, the limited knowledge of SARS-CoV-2’s behavior in wastewater makes the proper treatment of wastewater difficult, leaving a gap that should be taken and studied to improve the technologies proposed to eliminate the presence of the virus in aquatic compartments [28].
The European Union has long recognized the importance of environmental monitoring for recording the combined exposure of the environment and humans to contaminants and the unique role that these instruments play in identifying exposure to substances problematic for human health and the environment [29]. However, the current EU legislation relative to the water environment (Water Framework Directive and other daughter directives) is incomplete, not only because of the limited number of substances included compared to the huge amount used by our society (to date, only 45 priority substances have fixed environmental quality standards), but also because any mixture effects resulting from joint occurrence have been overlooked [30]. As the human population continues to increase, as industrial development, energy and land use continue to expand, and despite advances in pollution control, the continued production of pollution remains inevitable. Thus, the need for environmental monitoring is still as great as ever. The current body of evidence on the nature and spread of CECs is sparse, and further data are needed. Therefore, this Special Issue aims to focus on the occurrence and fate of CECs in the aquatic environment.
Contributions (i.e., original article, review, systematic review, communication, brief report, case report, discussion) may include, but are not limited to:
  • occurrence of CECs in the aquatic environment;
  • measurement techniques to investigate CECs;
  • integration of multiple stressors with CEC exposure in aquatic systems;
  • lethal and sublethal effects of CECs on aquatic organisms;
  • complexity of mixtures of CECs in the aquatic environment;
  • trophic consequences of CEC exposure across aquatic food webs;
  • duration of CEC exposure within and across generations in aquatic species;
  • pressure caused by antibiotic and other antimicrobial agents on the acquisition and spread of antibiotic resistance in the aquatic environment;
  • plastics, microplastics and nanoplastics;
  • CECs in wastewater;
  • remediation technologies involved in the treatment and removal of pollutants;
  • emerging pathogens for aquatic organisms and public health.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We thank Zeta Chen and the Editorial Office of the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health for their assistance with making this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Nawaz, T.; Sengupta, S. Chapter 4—Contaminants of Emerging Concern: Occurrence, Fate, and Remediation. In Advances in Water Purification Techniques: Meeting the Needs of Developed and Developing Countries; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2019; pp. 67–114. [Google Scholar]
  2. Starling, M.C.V.; Amorim, C.C.; Leão, M.M.D. Occurrence, control and fate of contaminants of emerging concern in environmental compartments in Brazil. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 372, 17–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Smital, T. Acute and chronic effects of emerging contaminants. In Emerging Contaminants from Industrial and Municipal Waste; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 105–142. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jelic, A.; Gros, M.; Ginebreda, A.; Cespedes-Sànchez, R.; Ventura, F.; Petrovic, M.; Barceló, D. Occurrence, partition and removal of pharmaceuticals in sewage water and sludge during wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2011, 45, 1165–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Keerthanan, S.; Jayasinghe, C.; Biswas, J.K.; Vithanage, M. Pharmaceutical and Personal Care Products (PPCPs) in the environment: Plant uptake, translocation, bioaccumulation, and human health risks. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. 2021, 51, 1221–1258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xu, H.; Meng, L.; Zhao, X.; Chen, J.; Lu, J.; Chovelon, J.M.; Ji, Y. Accelerated oxidation of the emerging brominated flame retardant tetrabromobisphenol S by unactivated peroxymonosulfate: The role of bromine catalysis and formation of disinfection byproducts. Water Res. 2021, 204, 117584. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Primel, E.G.; Caldas, S.S.; Marube, L.C.; Escarrone, A.L.V. An overview of advances in dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction for the extraction of pesticides and emerging contaminants from environmental samples. Trends Environ. Anal. Chem. 2017, 14, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Praveena, S.M.; Cheema, M.S.; Guo, H.R. Non-nutritive artificial sweeteners as an emerging contaminant in environment: A global review and risks perspectives. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019, 170, 699–707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Köck-Schulmeyer, M.; Ginebreda, A.; Petrovic, M.; Giulivo, M.; Aznar-Alemany, Ò.; Eljarrat, E.; Valle-Sistac, J.; Molins-Delgado, D.; Diaz-Cruz, M.S.; Monllor-Alcaraz, L.S.; et al. Priority and emerging organic microcontaminants in three Mediterranean river basins: Occurrence, spatial distribution, and identification of river basin specific pollutants. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 754, 142344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Broccoli, A.; Anselmi, S.; Cavallo, A.; Ferrari, V.; Prevedelli, D.; Pastorino, P.; Renzi, M. Ecotoxicoloical effects of new generation pollutants (nanoparticles, amoxicillin and white musk) on freshwater and marine phytoplankton species. Chemosphere 2021, 279, 130623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Pastorino, P.; Pizzul, E.; Bertoli, M.; Anselmi, S.; Kušće, M.; Menconi, V.; Prearo, M.; Renzi, M. First insights into plastic and microplastic occurrence in biotic and abiotic compartments, and snow from a high-mountain lake (Carnic Alps). Chemosphere 2020, 265, 129121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pastorino, P.; Nocita, A.; Ciccotelli, V.; Zaccaroni, A.; Anselmi, S.; Giugliano, R.; Tomasoni, M.; Silvi, M.; Menconi, V.; Vivaldi, B.; et al. Health Risk Assessment of Potentially Toxic Elements, Persistence of NDL-PCB, PAHs, and Microplastics in the Translocated Edible Freshwater Sinotaia quadrata (Gasteropoda, Viviparidae): A Case Study from the Arno River Basin (Central Italy). Expo. Health 2021, 13, 583–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Sicuro, B.; Pastorino, P.; Barbero, R.; Barisone, S.; Dellerba, D.; Menconi, V.; Righetti, M.; De Vita, V.; Prearo, M. Prevalence and antibiotic sensitivity of bacteria isolated from imported ornamental fish in Italy: A translocation of resistant strains? Prev. Vet. Med. 2020, 175, 104880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Ginebreda, A.; Barceló, D.; Rodríguez-Mozaz, S. Environmental Risk Assessment of Pharmaceuticals in Wastewater Treatment. In Removal and Degradation of Pharmaceutically Active Compounds in Wastewater Treatment; Rodriguez-Mozaz, S., Blánquez Cano, P., Sarrà Adroguer, M., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2020; Volume 108, pp. 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  15. Picó, Y.; Barceló, D. Mass Spectrometry in Wastewater-Based Epidemiology for the Determination of Small and Large Molecules as Biomarkers of Exposure: Toward a Global View of Environment and Human Health under the COVID-19 Outbreak. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 30865–30872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Oates, R.P.; Longley, G.; Hamlett, P.; Klein, D. Pharmaceutical and Endocrine Disruptor Compounds in Surface and Wastewater in San Marcos, Texas. Water Environ. Res. 2017, 89, 2021–2030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sumpter, J.P. Endocrine disrupters in the aquatic environment: An overview. Acta Hydrochim. Hydrobiol. 2005, 33, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shao, S.; Hu, Y.; Cheng, J.; Chen, Y. Research progress on distribution, migration, transformation of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in aquatic environment. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2018, 38, 1195–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ogden, N.H.; Gachon, P. Climate change and infectious diseases: The challenges: Climate change and infectious diseases: What can we expect? CCDR 2019, 45, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Tijani, J.O.; Fatoba, O.O.; Babajide, O.O.; Petrik, L.F. Pharmaceuticals, endocrine disruptors, personal care products, nanomaterials and perfluorinated pollutants: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2016, 14, 27–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Sörengård, M.; Campos-Pereira, H.; Ullberg, M.; Lai, F.Y.; Golovko, O.; Ahrens, L. Mass loads, source apportionment, and risk estimation of organic micropollutants from hospital and municipal wastewater in recipient catchments. Chemosphere 2019, 234, 931–941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Sengupta, A.; Lyons, J.M.; Smith, D.J.; Drewes, J.E.; Snyder, S.A.; Heil, A.; Maruya, K.A. The occurrence and fate of chemicals of emerging concern in coastal urban rivers receiving discharge of treated municipal wastewater effluent. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2014, 33, 350–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ebele, A.J.; Abdallah, M.A.E.; Harrad, S. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) in the freshwater aquatic environment. Emerg. Contam. 2017, 3, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Picó, Y.; Belenguer, V.; Corcellas, C.; Díaz-Cruz, M.S.; Eljarrat, E.; Farré, M.; Rodríguez-Mozaz, S.; Sabater, L.; Santín, G.; Barcelò, D. Contaminants of emerging concern in freshwater fish from four Spanish Rivers. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 659, 1186–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pastorino, P.; Prearo, M.; Bertoli, M.; Abete, M.C.; Dondo, A.; Salvi, G.; Zaccaroni, A.; Elia, A.C.; Pizzul, E. Accumulation of As, Cd, Pb, and Zn in sediment, chironomids and fish from a high-mountain lake: First insights from the Carnic Alps. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 729, 139007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Landrum, P.F.; Robbins, J.A. Bioavailability of sediment-associated contaminants to benthic invertebrates. In Sediments: Chemistry and Toxicity of In-Place Pollutants; Baudo, R., Giesy, J.P., Muntau, H., Eds.; Lewis Publishers: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1990; pp. 237–263. [Google Scholar]
  27. Previšić, A.; Rožman, M.; Mor, J.R.; Acuña, V.; Serra-Compte, A.; Petrović, M.; Sabater, S. Aquatic macroinvertebrates under stress: Bioaccumulation of emerging contaminants and metabolomics implications. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 704, 135333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Pacheco, C.A.R.; Hilares, R.T.; Andrade, G.D.J.C.; Mogrovejo-Valdivia, A.; Tanaka, D.A.P. Emerging contaminants, SARS-COV-2 and wastewater treatment plants, new challenges to confront: A short review. Bioresour. Technol. Rep. 2021, 15, 100731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. European Commission. Towards a Sustainable Chemicals Policy Strategy of the Union—Council Conclusions (10713/19). Available online: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/40042/st10713-en19.pdf (accessed on 7 December 2021).
  30. Kortenkamp, A.; Faust, M. Regulate to reduce chemical mixture risk. Science 2018, 361, 224–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pastorino, P.; Ginebreda, A. Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs): Occurrence and Fate in Aquatic Ecosystems. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 13401. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413401

AMA Style

Pastorino P, Ginebreda A. Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs): Occurrence and Fate in Aquatic Ecosystems. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(24):13401. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413401

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pastorino, Paolo, and Antoni Ginebreda. 2021. "Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs): Occurrence and Fate in Aquatic Ecosystems" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 24: 13401. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413401

APA Style

Pastorino, P., & Ginebreda, A. (2021). Contaminants of Emerging Concern (CECs): Occurrence and Fate in Aquatic Ecosystems. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24), 13401. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413401

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop