Next Article in Journal
The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Perception of Health and Treatment-Related Issues among Patients with Phenylketonuria in Poland—The Results of a National Online Survey
Previous Article in Journal
Facing Death: Attitudes toward Physician-Assisted End of Life among Physicians Working at a Tertiary-Care-Hospital in Israel
Review

Perspectives, Measurability and Effects of Non-Contact Biofield-Based Practices: A Narrative Review of Quantitative Research

1
Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, 4200-465 Porto, Portugal
2
Centro de Biociências em Saúde Integrativa (CBSIn), Atlântico Business School, 4405-604 Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal
3
Centro Transdisciplinar de Estudos da Consciência (CTEC), Universidade Fernando Pessoa, 4249-004 Porto, Portugal
4
Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), Universidade do Porto, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal
5
Instituto de Engenharia Biomédica (INEB), Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
6
Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (i3S), Universidade do Porto, 4200-135 Porto, Portugal
7
German Society of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Paul B. Tchounwou
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(12), 6397; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126397
Received: 13 April 2021 / Revised: 7 June 2021 / Accepted: 9 June 2021 / Published: 13 June 2021
Practices such as “Reiki”, therapeutic touch, healing touch, and external “Qigong” have been regarded as some form of “energy medicine” or “biofield therapy”. The biofield concept has been studied and debated by researchers of distinct areas of expertise, and although the phenomenon was sometimes described as physically related to electromagnetics, other factors such as “subtle energy” and focused intention might be involved. These nonconventional practices integrate contact and non-contact techniques, and those dealing with so-called distant healing interventions are perhaps the most difficult to understand and accept. Practitioners describe these so-called nonlocal interventions as involving intentional factors and particular states of consciousness. With a spiritual mindset and a particular state of awareness, compassion is said to work out as a catalyst to produce physiological and physical changes through mechanisms that are still unknown. At the body level, these vegetative changes might be related to individual self-perception variations as part of the body neurovegetative feedback system of regulation. Further mechanisms are difficult to document and measure, and might be more accessible to research by using physical signal detectors, chemical dynamics methods, detectors using biological materials, detectors using living sensors, and detectors using the human body. The growing interest in these practices and the considerable amount of research exploring their effects and clinical applications encouraged this narrative review, which aims to provide an easy to consult partial overview of the history, theory and findings of quantitative research strategies exploring non-contact biofield-based practices. This work also aims to stimulate the reader’s mind with the raised hypotheses, catalyzing further research on the subject to confirm or deny the reported outcomes. View Full-Text
Keywords: biofield; nonlocality; consciousness; intention; healing biofield; nonlocality; consciousness; intention; healing
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Matos, L.C.; Machado, J.P.; Monteiro, F.J.; Greten, H.J. Perspectives, Measurability and Effects of Non-Contact Biofield-Based Practices: A Narrative Review of Quantitative Research. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 6397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126397

AMA Style

Matos LC, Machado JP, Monteiro FJ, Greten HJ. Perspectives, Measurability and Effects of Non-Contact Biofield-Based Practices: A Narrative Review of Quantitative Research. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021; 18(12):6397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126397

Chicago/Turabian Style

Matos, Luís C., Jorge P. Machado, Fernando J. Monteiro, and Henry J. Greten 2021. "Perspectives, Measurability and Effects of Non-Contact Biofield-Based Practices: A Narrative Review of Quantitative Research" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, no. 12: 6397. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18126397

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop