Next Article in Journal
The Association of Maternal Accompaniment at Family Dinners and Depressive Symptoms of Korean Adolescents
Previous Article in Journal
The Mediating Role of the Patient Health Engagement Model on the Relationship Between Patient Perceived Autonomy Supportive Healthcare Climate and Health Literacy Skills
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 5
10.3390/ijerph17051742
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte and Platelet-To-Lymphocyte Ratios as Prognostic Markers of Survival in Patients with Head and Neck Tumours—Results of a Retrospective Multicentric Study

by
Zsuzsanna Szilasi
1,*,
Valéria Jósa
2,
Zsombor Zrubka
3,
Tünde Mezei
4,
Tamás Vass
5,
Keresztély Merkel
5,
Frigyes Helfferich
1 and
Zsolt Baranyai
6
1
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, HDF Medical Centre, H-1134 Budapest, Hungary
2
Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Jahn Ferenc Hospital, H-1204 Budapest, Hungary
3
Department of Health Economics, Corvinus University of Budapest, H-1093 Budapest, Hungary
4
Department of Urology, Jahn Ferenc Hospital, H-1204 Budapest, Hungary
5
Department of Surgery, Szent Imre Hospital, H-1115 Budapest, Hungary
6
1st Department of Surgery, Semmelweis University, H-1082 Budapest, Hungary
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(5), 1742; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051742
Submission received: 15 January 2020 / Revised: 27 February 2020 / Accepted: 3 March 2020 / Published: 7 March 2020
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) may be useful for drawing conclusions about the survival of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. Methods: Clinical data of 156 patients managed for HNSCC at two head and neck surgery centres were analyzed retrospectively. We studied the relationships between survival and PLR as well as NLR. Results: With regards to 5-year survival, the difference between the two groups with PLR values lower or higher than the threshold was statistically significant (p = 0.004), and we found the same for disease-free survival (p = 0.05), and tumour-specific mortality (p = 0.009). Concerning NLR, the difference in tumour-specific survival was statistically significant (p = 0.006). According to the multivariate analysis, NLR values higher than the threshold indicated an enhanced risk for overall as well as for tumour-specific mortality. Conclusion: In HNSCC patients, a high NLR may be considered as an independent risk factor for 5-year overall survival.

1. Introduction

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) of mucosal origin is the sixth most common malignancy, with an estimated 900,000 new cases and about 350,000 fatalities a year worldwide [1]. The availability of an easy-to-determine prognostic factor could improve the effectiveness of individualized therapy.
Certain formed elements of the blood, as well as their ratios, can be used to establish the diagnosis and to predict prognosis.
Malignant tumours influence the number of platelets and alter their functioning. However, the mechanisms of the relationship between thrombocytosis and the tumour have not yet been fully elucidated and several hypotheses have been proposed [2].
The facilitatory role of chronic inflammation in the development and progression of solid tumours have been described for malignancies of the lung, breast, and gastrointestinal tract, the prostate, and the ovaries [3,4,5,6,7], as well as for HNSCC [8,9].
Neutrophils might, in fact, facilitate tumour growth and the formation of metastases—these cells can inhibit the activities of the lymphocytes and thereby attenuate the antitumour immune response [10]. Neutrophil cells can contribute to carcinogenesis and tumour progression in many ways [11]: (1) These cells can release genotoxic substances, which damage the DNA of epithelial cells [12]. (2) They can promote tumour growth by releasing soluble factors and proteases, such as prostaglandin E2 and neutrophil elastase [13,14]. (3) Neutrophils facilitate metastasis formation by enhancing the capabilities of the tumour cells for migration, invasive spread, and colony formation, as well as by breaking down the extracellular matrix [15]. (4) They contribute to the formation of new blood vessels by producing pro-angiogenic factors, such as matrix metalloproteinase-9, and vascular endothelial growth factor [16]. (5) Neutrophils exert immunosuppressive action by inhibiting effector T-cells along with the proliferation and the functioning of natural killer cells, as well the fact that they enhance tumour growth and metastasis formation through the modulation of macrophage activity [17].
These observations suggest that neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) determined in the blood of patients with a malignancy might be related to tumour growth [18].
Our study intended to ascertain whether pre-treatment NLR and PLR values determined in HNSCC patients are suitable predictors of survival.

2. Materials and Methods

The study was approved by the Scientific and Research Ethics Committee of the Hungarian Medical Research Council on 14 December 2015 (Nr. 8951-3/2015/EKU (0444/15).
We conducted a retrospective analysis on the clinical data of patients managed for primary HNSCC at two head and neck surgical centres (Uzsoki Street Hospital, Budapest and Medical Centre of the Hungarian Defence Forces, Budapest), between 2000 and 2014. The criteria for inclusion comprised the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma confirmed by histology, and the availability of platelet, neutrophil, and lymphocyte counts measured at the earliest one month before treatment. The exclusion criteria were as follows: the lack of an R0 resection, the presence of a synchronous tumour, inflammatory conditions (fistula of the neck, pneumonia, wound infection, abscess, cholecystitis, cannula sepsis, endocarditis, urinary tract infection, Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, etc.), thromboembolic events (deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction), corticosteroid therapy, and treatment with platelet aggregation inhibitors during the month before blood sampling.
The data available on the factors predisposing to malignancy (smoking, alcohol consumption, infection by human papillomavirus or by the Epstein–Barr virus, etc.) were incomplete and hence, we did not take these into account in our study. Overall survival was defined as the period from the first day of treatment to the day of death from any cause—or to the last date of observation. Disease-free survival was calculated as the time from the start date of treatment and to the date of the detection of recurrence. Missing mortality data were supplemented with information obtained from public health databases maintained by the government.
Based on the above criteria, 393 out of the 549 patients were excluded owing to incomplete laboratory data and hence, 156 patients were included in the study. They were staged according to the 7th edition of the TNM classification of the American Joint Committee on Cancer. Due to the occasional uncertainty of the clinical information available, we had to work with diverse survival data. In particular, overall, disease-specific, and tumour-specific survivals were analysed using data available from 156, 150, and 149 patients.

Statistical Analysis

The relationships among categorical variables were analysed with the cross-table method and the χ2 test. The non-parametric Mann–Whitney, U-, and Kruskal–Wallis tests were used to study the associations between the continuous variables PLR, NLR, and the subgroups of patients. The survival of patients with PLR and NLR values lower or higher than the threshold was analysed with the log-rank test and plotted as a Kaplan–Meier survival curve. The correlations between PLR, NLR, and survival were controlled for age, gender, and the characteristics of the malignancy, and then subjected to multivariate Cox regression analysis. The joint effect of discrete, multiple categorical variables was appraised with the Wald test. The validity of Cox models was verified by testing the proportional hazard assumption with the Grambsch and Ternau score test [19], the goodness of fit on 4 quantiles of risk with the May and Hosmer test [20], and the global significance of the models with the likelihood ratio (LR) test. All calculations were performed with version 14.2 of the Stata statistical software [21].
The optimal threshold values of PLR and NLR were determined as follows: the effect of individual PLR and NLR thresholds was studied as independent variables in logistic regression models designed to assess 5-year survival. Rounding PLR and NLR values to the accuracy of 1 and of 0.1, we calculated the area under the ROC curve (AUROC) for every threshold level. The optimal threshold values most effective for distinguishing among the patients by 5-year mortality, as determined based on AUROC peaks were 107 for PLR (Figure 1A) and 3.9 for NLR. (Figure 1B)

3. Results

The mean age of the subjects was 58.1 years (± SD: 8.7); and the proportion of females was 19.9%. The median duration of follow-up was 36 months, whereas the shortest duration was 4.9 and the longest was 161 months. Sixty-three patients died during the study, and 43 of them from malignant disease. Recurrence occurred in 72 patients. Median survival was 124.4 months (95% CI 71.6–∞), whereas median disease-free survival was 78.5 months (95% CI 33.5–∞).
The distributions of both PLR and NLR were skewed to the right (Figure 2). Median PLR was 113 (IQR: 84.5 to 160), and its value reached or exceeded the threshold of 107 in 53.9% of the patients. Median NLR was 2.8 (IQR: 2.1 to 3.8), and 20.5% of the patients had an NLR value corresponding to the threshold of 3.9 or higher—the latter was observed only in combination with PLR values higher than the threshold. PLR was elevated in 33.3% of the patients, and neither PLR nor NLR was elevated in 46.2%. Considering the demographical parameters and the characteristics of the malignancy, a significant relationship of PLR and NLR values was detected only with tumour stage (Kruskal–Wallis test p < 0.001, and p = 0.004), and with the primary extension of the tumour (Figure 3). Red blood cell count (median: 4.57; IQR: 4.31 to 4.93) was not correlated with PLR (r = −0.019, p = 0.811) or with NLR (r = −0.023, p = 0.770). Platelet count (median: 270 G/L; IQR: 220.5 to 333) exhibited moderate correlation with PLR (r = 0.680, p < 0.001), and weak correlation with NLR values (r = 0.227, p = 0.004). The study population was divided into three groups by primary treatment modality—that is, into groups formed by patients treated with surgery, by radio-/chemotherapy, or radiotherapy. Considering primary and secondary therapies together, 136 patients underwent surgery, 65 were treated with chemotherapy, and 49 with radiotherapy.
The subjects were also studied after grouping by the site of origin of the tumour (Table 1). The age distribution, tumour stage, the proportion of patients with a PLR value higher than the threshold, and of those surviving for 5 years differed significantly by tumour location. The proportion of patients with PLR values higher than the threshold was the largest (71.7%) among those with tumours of the hypopharynx, and the smallest (25.0%) among those with oropharyngeal malignancies.
Over a period of five years, 24.6% of the patients with a PLR value under the threshold of 107 died, whereas the mortality rate was 46.4% among those with a PLR ≥107—the difference between these two groups was statistically significant (log-rank test χ2 (df = 1) = 8.14, p = 0.004). Over five years, tumour recurrence occurred in 37.1% of patients with a PLR value lower than the threshold, and in 52.2% of those with a PLR value higher than the threshold. The difference between the two groups was significant also with regard to disease-free survival (log-rank test χ2 (df = 1) = 4.03, p = 0.045), as well as tumour-specific mortality (log-rank test χ2 (df = 1) = 6.89, p = 0.009).
The mortality rate of patients with an NLR value under the threshold of 3.9 was 32.3%, whereas 56.5% of patients with NLR ≥ 3.9 died. The five-year recurrence rate was 43.0% in the former and 55.2% in the latter group; this difference was not statistically significant (log-rank test χ2 (df = 1) = 2.21, p = 0.138). By contrast, a statistically significant difference in tumour-specific survival was noted between the two groups (log-rank test χ2 (df = 1) = 7.43, p = 0.006).
We also studied the correlation between the combination of PLR and NLR values and five-year mortality. The subjects could be categorised into the following three groups: (1) Both NLR and PLR were higher than the threshold, (2) only PLR was higher than the threshold, and (3) both NLR and PLR were lower than the threshold. We found significant differences among the three groups in overall survival (log-rank test χ2 (df = 2) = 12.78, p = 0.002), and in tumour-specific survival (log-rank test χ2 (df = 2) = 9.92, p = 0.007). However, disease-free survival was not significantly different among these three groups (log-rank test χ2 (df = 2) = 4.45, p = 0.108). The chance for five-year survival was the highest in patients who had both NLR and PLR values under the threshold, and it was the lowest in those in whom both ratios were elevated (Figure 4).
We analysed the five-year mortality, tumour-specific mortality, and disease-free survival with multivariate Cox-regression, using the impact of PLR and of NLR, as well as the joint effect of these two markers as independent variables. Age, gender, tumour stage, the grade of differentiation, initial region, red blood cell count, and thrombocytosis were used as control variables. In our study population, NLR values higher than the threshold were observed only in combination with elevated PLR values and therefore, studying the effect of isolated NLR elevation was not possible. The assumption for the proportional hazard was not fulfilled in the models designed to study tumour-specific mortality and accordingly, their coefficients are of limited validity. Among the control variables, male gender and advanced tumour stage were associated with an enhanced risk with respect to survival. Further, the likelihood of tumour recurrence was significantly correlated with male gender and with the grade of tumour differentiation. There was an inverse relationship between red blood cell count and the risk of mortality and of recurrence—that is, the elevation of red blood cell count was associated with a lower risk of death or tumour recurrence (Table 2). In models controlled for the extension of T stage—analysed instead of or in combination with TNM stage—the conclusions regarding overall survival remained unchanged. The models containing platelet count as a continuous control variable similarly did not influence the negative prognostic role of NLR for overall survival. However, the coefficients of the model of tumour-specific mortality did not prove stable upon adjusting the control variables, and the NLR value lost significance following the addition of T stage as a control variable.

4. Discussion

Patients with a high platelet count are at an increased risk of cancer, as well as certain malignancies which exhibit a closer relationship with thrombocytosis [22,23]. Previous studies confirmed the prognostic significance of platelet count in a variety of solid (renal-cell, hepatocellular, lung, colorectal, gastric, and gynaecological) tumours [24,25,26,27,28,29].
Similar to elevated platelet count, high PLR has been found to be associated with worse survival in a variety of solid (hepatocellular, ovarian, cervix, colorectal, bile duct, breast, lung, renal cell, gastric, prostate, and oesophageal) tumours [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. Moreover, several studies confirmed the relationship between elevated NLR and a worse prognosis in patients with malignant oesophageal [41], colorectal [42,43], pancreas [44,45], prostate [46,47], hepatic [48,49], bile duct [50], breast [51], gastric [52,53], cutaneous melanocytic [54], thyroid medullary [55], and lung [56] tumours. It is important to note, however, that NLR may be elevated also in many benign disorders [57,58].
The NLR and PLR cut-off levels chosen in various studies varied in a wide range (NLR: 2.0 to 4.2 [55,59,60,61,62,63], PLR: 105.3–170 [55,62,63]). In our study, the optimal threshold value, determined with the statistical method detailed herein, was 107 for PLR and 3.9 for NLR.
The association between elevated PLR or NLR and worse prognosis was observed also in HNSCC [61,63,64,65,66], although these studies were limited to tumours of a specific location or stage, or to patients receiving a certain treatment modality. According to our findings, elevated PLR was associated with a significantly inferior five-year survival and disease-free survival, as well as with greater tumour-specific mortality. In case of elevated NLR, by contrast, only the increase of tumour-specific mortality was significant. Primary treatment modality had no significant influence on NLR/PLR values.
RASSOULI et al. found that when considered together as a prognostic marker for survival, the combination of NLR and PLR proves as reliable as does TNM staging [62]. Our study yielded similar findings, because the chance for five-year survival was the highest if neither NLR nor PLR exceeded the threshold level. Conversely, survival rate was the lowest when both NLR and PLR were elevated.
In another study, the prognostic value of NLR was also assessed by the primary location of naso-/oro-/hypopharyngeal or laryngeal tumours; however, only patients undergoing radiotherapy were included. A significant relationship was demonstrated for nasal, hypopharyngeal, and laryngeal— but not for oropharyngeal—tumours [60]. In our study, we did not detect any significant differences between NLR and the different primary locations of the tumours. By contrast, the proportion of patients with PLR values higher than the threshold differed significantly by primary site: it was the highest with hypopharyngeal and the lowest with oropharyngeal tumours. HPV status was not available for our analysis, but the frequent occurence of HPV-positive tumours in the oropharynx may give an explanation for the above-mentioned lower incidence of high PLR value at this tumour site. Some studies suggest that HPV infection might alter inflammatory response by altering white blood cell distribution and thus affect the PLR and NLR values [67]. Rosculet et al. obtained similar results in their retrospective study. They found that NLR is an indicator of both disease-free and overall survival, but it does not have independent prognostic significance when HPV status is incorporated into multivariate analysis [68].
When used as prognostic factors, the advantage of NLR and PLR is that both can be determined by routine laboratory methods. However, both are influenced by inflammation or anaemia, and this may undermine their reliability. This is why we defined active inflammation among the exclusion criteria, as well as used red blood cell count as a control variable during the multivariate analysis. According to the multivariate Cox regression analysis controlled in this fashion, PLR had no significant influence on mortality risk in any of the models. By contrast, NLR values higher than the threshold represented an enhanced risk both for overall and for tumour-specific mortality. Neither PLR nor NLR had a significant impact on the risk of tumour recurrence.

5. Conclusions

NLR values over the threshold of 3.9 (determined using the data of our patients) may be regarded as an independent risk factor for five-year survival in malignancies of the head and neck region. NLR was closely associated, both with the size of the primary tumour and with the stage of the malignant disease. Furthermore, NLR values higher than the threshold represented an enhanced risk regarding overall survival, as well as in other models controlled for the extension of the primary tumour, for the stage of the malignant disease, and for other demographical parameters, or disease characteristics. In view of the foregoing, therefore, we recommend determining NLR in routine clinical practice as a risk factor for five-year overall survival. On the other hand, we could not demonstrate a significant relationship between tumour-free survival and NLR, and this relationship was not consistent with regard to tumour-specific survival.
Nevertheless, it would be desirable to undertake a similar study in a larger population of patients, and with other malignancies (of the thyroid or salivary glands, for example) of the head and neck region.

Author Contributions

Z.S.: acquisition of data, literature search, writing the article. V.J.: data collection, literature search. Z.Z.: statistical analysis, interpretation of data. T.M.: acquisition of data, literature search. T.V.: acquisition of data, critical revision. K.M.: literature search, critical revision. F.H.: study conception and design, critical revision. Z.B.: study conception and design, writing the article, critical revision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical Standards

The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional guidelines on human experimentation (Scientific and Research Ethics Committee of the Hungarian Medical Research Council (Nr. 8951-3/2015/EKU (0444/15)) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2013.

Abbreviations

PLRplatelet-to-lymphocyte ratio
NLRneutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio
HNSCChead and neck squamous cell carcinoma

References

  1. Singh, J.; Jayaraj, R.; Baxi, S.; Ramamoorthi, R.; Thomas, M. Incidence and mortality from mucosal head and neck cancers amongst Australian states and territories: What it means for the northern territory. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2013, 14, 5621–5624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Buergy, D.; Wenz, F.; Groden, C.; Brockmann, M.A. Tumor—Platelet interaction in solid tumors. Int. J. Cancer 2012, 130, 2747–2760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ardies, C.M. Inflammation as cause for scar cancers of the lung. Integr. Cancer Ther. 2003, 2, 238–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Van der Auwera, I.; Van Laere, S.J.; Van den Eynden, G.G.; Benoy, I.; van Dam, P.; Colpaert, C.G.; Fox, S.B.; Turley, H.; Harris, A.L.; Van Marck, E.A.; et al. Increased angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis in inflammatory versus noninflammatory breast cancer by real-time reverse transcriptase-PCR gene expression quantification. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 2004, 10, 7965–7971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Karaman, H.; Karaman, A.; Erden, A.; Poyrazoglu, O.K.; Karakukcu, C.; Tasdemir, A. Relationship between colonic polyp type and the neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio as a biomarker. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. APJCP 2013, 14, 3159–3161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wang, W.; Bergh, A.; Damber, J.E. Chronic inflammation in benign prostate hyperplasia is associated with focal upregulation of cyclooxygenase-2, Bcl-2, and cell proliferation in the glandular epithelium. Prostate 2004, 61, 60–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Altinoz, M.A.; Korkmaz, R. NF-kappaB, macrophage migration inhibitory factor and cyclooxygenase-inhibitions as likely mechanisms behind the acetaminophen- and NSAID-prevention of the ovarian cancer. Neoplasma 2004, 51, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Hanna, G.J.; Adkins, D.R.; Zolkind, P.; Uppaluri, R. Rationale for neoadjuvant immunotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2017, 73, 65–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ambatipudi, S.; Langdon, R.; Richmond, R.C.; Suderman, M.; Koestler, D.C.; Kelsey, K.T.; Kazmi, N.; Penfold, C.; Ho, K.M.; McArdle, W.; et al. DNA methylation derived systemic inflammation indices are associated with head and neck cancer development and survival. Oral Oncol. 2018, 85, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Jenne, C.N.; Urrutia, R.; Kubes, P. Platelets: Bridging hemostasis, inflammation, and immunity. Int. J. Lab. Hematol. 2013, 35, 254–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, X.; Zhang, W.; Yuan, X.; Fu, M.; Qian, H.; Xu, W.R. Neutrophils in cancer development and progression: Roles, mechanisms, and implications (Review). Int. J. Oncol. 2016, 49, 857–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Haqqani, A.S.; Sandhu, J.K.; Birnboim, H.C. Expression of interleukin-8 promotes neutrophil infiltration and genetic instability in mutatect tumors. Neoplasia 2000, 2, 561–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Houghton, A.M.; Rzymkiewicz, D.M.; Ji, H.; Gregory, A.D.; Egea, E.E.; Metz, H.E.; Stolz, D.B.; Land, S.R.; Marconcini, L.A.; Kliment, C.R.; et al. Neutrophil elastase-mediated degradation of IRS-1 accelerates lung tumor growth. Nat. Med. 2010, 16, 219–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Gong, L.; Cumpian, A.M.; Caetano, M.S.; Ochoa, C.E.; De la Garza, M.M.; Lapid, D.J.; Mirabolfathinejad, S.G.; Dickey, B.F.; Zhou, Q.; Moghaddam, S.J. Promoting effect of neutrophils on lung tumorigenesis is mediated by CXCR2 and neutrophil elastase. Mol. Cancer 2013, 12, 154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Liang, W.; Ferrara, N. The Complex Role of Neutrophils in Tumor Angiogenesis and Metastasis. Cancer Immunol. Res. 2016, 4, 83–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Tazzyman, S.; Lewis, C.E.; Murdoch, C. Neutrophils: Key mediators of tumour angiogenesis. Int. J. Exp. Pathol. 2009, 90, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, J.; Qiao, X.; Shi, H.; Han, X.; Liu, W.; Tian, X.; Zeng, X. Circulating tumor-associated neutrophils (cTAN) contribute to circulating tumor cell survival by suppressing peripheral leukocyte activation. Tumour Biol. 2016, 37, 5397–5404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ueno, H.; Hawrylowicz, C.M.; Banchereau, J. Immunological intervention in human diseases. J. Transl. Med. 2007, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Grambsch, P.M.; Therneau, T.M. Proportional hazards tests and diagnostics based on weighted residuals. Biometrika 1994, 81, 515–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hosmer, D.; Lemeshow, S.; May, S. Applied Survival Analysis; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  21. Stata Corp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14; Stata Corp LP.: College Station, TX, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  22. Nash, G.F.; Turner, L.F.; Scully, M.F.; Kakkar, A.K. Platelets and cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2002, 3, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bailey, S.E.R.; Ukoumunne, O.C.; Shephard, E.; Hamilton, W. How useful is thrombocytosis in predicting an underlying cancer in primary care? a systematic review. Fam. Pract. 2017, 34, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Aoe, K.; Hiraki, A.; Ueoka, H.; Kiura, K.; Tabata, M.; Tanaka, M.; Tanimoto, M. Thrombocytosis as a useful prognostic indicator in patients with lung cancer. Respiration 2004, 71, 170–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bensalah, K.; Leray, E.; Fergelot, P.; Rioux-Leclercq, N.; Tostain, J.; Guillé, F.; Patard, J.-J. Prognostic value of thrombocytosis in renal cell carcinoma. J. Urol. 2006, 175, 859–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Carr, B.I.; Guerra, V. Thrombocytosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2013, 58, 1790–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Ishizuka, M.; Nagata, H.; Takagi, K.; Iwasaki, Y.; Kubota, K. Preoperative thrombocytosis is associated with survival after surgery for colorectal cancer. J. Surg. Oncol. 2012, 106, 887–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yu, M.; Liu, L.; Zhang, B.-L.; Chen, Q.; Ma, X.-L.; Wu, Y.-K.; Liang, C.-S.; Niu, Z.-M.; Qin, X.; Niu, T. Pretreatment thrombocytosis as a prognostic factor in women with gynecologic malignancies: A meta-analysis. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2012, 13, 6077–6081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hwang, S.G.; Kim, K.M.; Cheong, J.H.; Kim, H.I.; An, J.Y.; Hyung, W.J.; Noh, S.H. Impact of pretreatment thrombocytosis on blood-borne metastasis and prognosis of gastric cancer. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol. 2012, 38, 562–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dong, L.; Bai, K.; Cao, Y.; Huang, Q.; Lv, L.; Jiang, Y. Prognostic Value of Pre-Operative Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio in Patients with Resected Primary Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin. Lab. 2016, 62, 2191–2196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hu, D.; Lin, Y.; Liu, F.; Zeng, L.; Ouyang, X.; Wang, K.; Zheng, X.; Huang, Q. Elevated Preoperative Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio Indicates Poor Survival in Patients with Resected High-grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma. Clin. Lab. 2016, 62, 1443–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, L.; Jia, J.; Lin, L.; Guo, J.; Ye, X.; Zheng, X.; Chen, Y. Predictive value of hematological markers of systemic inflammation for managing cervical cancer. Oncotarget 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Kim, J.H.; Lee, J.Y.; Kim, H.K.; Lee, J.W.; Jung, S.G.; Jung, K.; Kim, S.E.; Moon, W.; Park, M.I.; Park, S.J. Prognostic significance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with stage III and IV colorectal cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2017, 23, 505–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cho, K.-M.; Park, H.; Oh, D.-Y.; Kim, T.-Y.; Lee, K.-H.; Han, S.-W.; Im, S.-A.; Kim, T.-Y.; Bang, Y.-J. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and their dynamic changes during chemotherapy is useful to predict a more accurate prognosis of advanced biliary tract cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 2329–2341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Zhu, Y.; Si, W.; Sun, Q.; Qin, B.; Zhao, W.; Yang, J. Platelet-lymphocyte ratio acts as an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 1023–1030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Han, Y.; Wang, J.; Hong, L.; Sun, L.; Zhuang, H.; Sun, B.; Wang, H.; Zhang, X.; Ren, X. Platelet-lymphocyte ratio is an independent prognostic factor in patients with ALK-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. Future Oncol. 2017, 13, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Park, T.J.; Cho, Y.H.; Chung, H.S.; Hwang, E.C.; Jung, S.-H.; Hwang, J.E.; Bae, W.K.; Kim, J.W.; Heo, S.H.; Hur, Y.H.; et al. Prognostic significance of platelet-lymphocyte ratio in patients receiving first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors for metastatic renal cell cancer. Springerplus 2016, 5, 1889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Xu, Z.; Xu, W.; Cheng, H.; Shen, W.; Ying, J.; Cheng, F.; Xu, W. The Prognostic Role of the Platelet-Lymphocytes Ratio in Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, Y.; Xu, F.; Pan, J.; Zhu, Y.; Shao, X.; Sha, J.; Wang, Z.; Cai, Y.; Liu, Q.; Dong, B.; et al. Platelet to lymphocyte ratio as an independent prognostic indicator for prostate cancer patients receiving androgen deprivation therapy. BMC Cancer 2016, 16, 329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Yodying, H.; Matsuda, A.; Miyashita, M.; Matsumoto, S.; Sakurazawa, N.; Yamada, M.; Uchida, E. Prognostic Significance of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Oncologic Outcomes of Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann. Surg. Oncol. 2016, 23, 646–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Han, F.Y.; Liu, Y.Q.; Cheng, S.Q.; Sun, Z.H.; Sheng, C.C.; Sun, X.Y.; Shang, X.M.; Tian, W.J.; Wang, X.Y.; Li, J.M.; et al. Diagnosis and survival values of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and red blood cell distribution width (RDW) in esophageal cancer. Clin. Chim. Acta 2019, 488, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Sunakawa, Y.; Yang, D.Y.; Cao, S.; Zhang, W.; Moran, M.; Astrow, S.H.; Hsiang, J.; Stephens, C.; Tsuji, A.; Takahashi, T.; et al. Immune-related Genes to Dominate Neutrophil-lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) Associated With Survival of Cetuximab Treatment in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Clin. Colorectal Cancer 2018, 17, E741–E749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Diakos, C.I.; Wilson, K.; Asher, R.; Gebski, V.; Yip, S.; van Hazel, G.; Robinson, B.; Broad, A.; Price, T.J.; Simes, J.; et al. Is baseline neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) an independent prognostic biomarker for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)? Analysis of the AGITG MAX study. Ann. Oncol. 2016, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Garcea, G.; Ladwa, N.; Neal, C.P.; Metcalfe, M.S.; Dennison, A.R.; Berry, D.P. Preoperative Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) is Associated with Reduced Disease-free Survival Following Curative Resection of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma. World J. Surg. 2011, 35, 868–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Alagappan, M.; Pollom, E.L.; von Eyben, R.; Kozak, M.M.; Aggarwal, S.; Poultsides, G.A.; Koong, A.C.; Chang, D.T. Albumin and Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) Predict Survival in Patients With Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Treated With SBRT. Am. J. Clin. Oncol. Cancer Clin. Trials 2018, 41, 242–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lorente, D.; Mateo, J.; Templeton, A.J.; Zafeiriou, Z.; Bianchini, D.; Ferraldeschi, R.; Bahl, A.; Shen, L.; Su, Z.; Sartor, O.; et al. Baseline neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is associated with survival and response to treatment with second-line chemotherapy for advanced prostate cancer independent of baseline steroid use. Ann. Oncol. 2015, 26, 750–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Nuhn, P.; Vaghasia, A.M.; Goyal, J.; Zhou, X.C.; Carducci, M.A.; Eisenberger, M.A.; Antonarakis, E.S. Association of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated with first-line docetaxel. BJU Int. 2014, 114, E11–E17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Ji, F.; Liang, Y.; Fu, S.J.; Guo, Z.Y.; Shu, M.; Shen, S.L.; Li, S.Q.; Peng, B.G.; Liang, L.J.; Hua, Y.P. A novel and accurate predictor of survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after surgical resection: The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) combined with the aspartate aminotransferase/platelet count ratio index (APRI). BMC Cancer 2016, 16, 137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Afshar, M.; Clarke, H.; Jackson-Wilding, A.; Ahmed, A.; Ma, Y.T.; Punia, P. Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (nlr) at diagnosis is a predictor for survival in patients receiving sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (hcc): A large UK cohort. J. Hepatol. 2015, 62, S442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ha, H.; Nam, A.R.; Bang, J.H.; Park, J.E.; Kim, T.Y.; Lee, K.H.; Han, S.W.; Im, S.A.; Kim, T.Y.; Bang, Y.J.; et al. Soluble programmed death-ligand 1 (sPDL1) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predicts survival in advanced biliary tract cancer patients treated with palliative chemotherapy. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 76604–76612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Orditura, M.; Galizia, G.; Diana, A.; Saccone, C.; Cobellis, L.; Ventriglia, J.; Iovino, F.; Romano, C.; Morgillo, F.; Mosca, L.; et al. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) for prediction of distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in early breast cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis. ESMO Open 2016, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Li, Y.C.; Wang, C.Y.; Xu, M.D.; Kong, C.C.; Qu, A.B.; Zhang, M.; Zheng, Z.C.; Zhang, G.R. Preoperative NLR for predicting survival rate after radical resection combined with adjuvant immunotherapy with CIK and postoperative chemotherapy in gastric cancer. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 143, 861–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Guo, J.; Chen, S.X.; Chen, Y.M.; Li, S.; Xu, D.Z. Combination of CRP and NLR: A better predictor of postoperative survival in patients with gastric cancer. Cancer Manag. Res. 2018, 10, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Capone, M.; Giannarelli, D.; Mallardo, D.; Madonna, G.; Festino, L.; Grimaldi, A.M.; Vanella, V.; Simeone, E.; Paone, M.; Palmieri, G.; et al. Baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and derived NLR could predict overall survival in patients with advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab. J. Immunother. Cancer 2018, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Jiang, K.; Lei, J.; Chen, W.; Gong, Y.; Luo, H.; Li, Z.; Gong, R.; Zhu, J. Association of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios with lymph node metastasis and recurrence in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma. Medicine 2016, 95, e5079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Powles, T.; Jin, C.Y.; Zheng, Y.N.; Baverel, P.; Narwal, R.; Mukhopadhyay, P.; Jin, X.P.; Dennis, P.A.; Gupta, A.K.; Ben, Y.; et al. Tumor shrinkage and increased overall survival are associated with improved albumin, neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and decreased durvalumab clearance in NSCLC and UC patients receiving durvalumab. J. Clin. Oncol. 2017, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Turkmen, K.; Erdur, F.M.; Ozcicek, F.; Ozcicek, A.; Akbas, E.M.; Ozbicer, A.; Demirtas, L.; Turk, S.; Tonbul, H.Z. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio better predicts inflammation than neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in end-stage renal disease patients. Hemodialysis Int. 2013, 17, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Shah, N.; Parikh, V.; Patel, N.; Patel, N.; Badheka, A.; Deshmukh, A.; Rathod, A.; Lafferty, J. Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio significantly improves the Framingham risk score in prediction of coronary heart disease mortality: Insights from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey-III. Int. J. Cardiol. 2014, 171, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Salim, D.K.; Mutlu, H.; Eryilmaz, M.K.; Salim, O.; Musri, F.Y.; Tural, D.; Gunduz, S.; Coskun, H.S. Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio is an independent prognostic factor in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell cancer. Mol. Clin. Oncol. 2015, 3, 839–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Cho, Y.; Kim, J.W.; Yoon, H.I.; Lee, C.G.; Keum, K.C.; Lee, I.J. The Prognostic Significance of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Head and Neck Cancer Patients Treated with Radiotherapy. J. Clin. Med. 2018, 7, 512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Hyder, J.; Molitoris, J.; Engelman, A.; Hanlon, A.; D’Emic, N.; Suntharalingam, M.; Chuong, M.D. Changes in Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) During Chemoradiation for Head and Neck Cancer Are Significant Predictor for Overall Survival. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2015, 93, S174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Rassouli, A.; Saliba, J.; Castano, R.; Hier, M.; Zeitouni, A.G. Systemic inflammatory markers as independent prognosticators of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2014, 37, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Turri-Zanoni, M.; Salzano, G.; Lambertoni, A.; Giovannardi, M.; Karligkiotis, A.; Battaglia, P.; Castelnuovo, P. Prognostic value of pretreatment peripheral blood markers in paranasal sinus cancer: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio. Head Neck 2017, 39, 730–736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Ong, H.S.; Gokavarapu, S.; Wang, L.Z.; Tian, Z.; Zhang, C.P. Low Pretreatment Lymphocyte-Monocyte Ratio and High Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio Indicate Poor Cancer Outcome in Early Tongue Cancer. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2017, 75, 1762–1774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Kara, M.; Uysal, S.; Altinişik, U.; Cevizci, S.; Güçlü, O.; Dereköy, F.S. The pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, and red cell distribution width predict prognosis in patients with laryngeal carcinoma. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2017, 274, 535–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Foster, C.C.; Kochanny, S.; Khattri, A.; Acharya, R.; Dekker, A.; Tan, Y.H.C. Association of a baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with progressionfree and overall survival in head and neck cancer patients receiving anti-PD-1 therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Rachidi, S.; Wallace, K.; Wrangle, J.M.; Day, T.A.; Alberg, A.J.; Li, Z. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and overall survival in all sites of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2016, 38 (Suppl. S1), E1068–E1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Rosculet, N.; Zhou, X.C.; Ha, P.; Tang, M.; Levine, M.A.; Neuner, G.; Califano, J. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: Prognostic indicator for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head Neck 2017, 39, 662–667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijerph 17 01742 g001 550
Figure 1. Threshold values of PLR (A) and NLR (B).
Figure 1. Threshold values of PLR (A) and NLR (B).
Ijerph 17 01742 g001
Ijerph 17 01742 g002 550
Figure 2. The distribution of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (A), and of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (B).
Figure 2. The distribution of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (A), and of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (B).
Ijerph 17 01742 g002
Ijerph 17 01742 g003 550
Figure 3. The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (A), and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (B) in subgroups defined according to the stage and the location of the primary tumour (T).
Figure 3. The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (A), and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (B) in subgroups defined according to the stage and the location of the primary tumour (T).
Ijerph 17 01742 g003
Ijerph 17 01742 g004 550
Figure 4. Five-year survival as a function of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (A), of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (B), or of both markers (C).
Figure 4. Five-year survival as a function of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (A), of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (B), or of both markers (C).
Ijerph 17 01742 g004
Table
Table 1. Main patient characteristics by tumour location.
Table 1. Main patient characteristics by tumour location.
All PatientsHypo-PharynxOropharynxOral CavitySub-/SupraglottisGlottisMultiple Regions
N (%)N (%)N (%)N (%)N (%)N (%)N (%)χ2
GenderFemale31 (19.9)8 (15.1)7 (43.8)1 (20.0)7 (20.6)7 (15.6)1 (33.3)p = 0.195
Male125 (80.1)45 (84.9)9 (56.2)4 (80.0)27 (79.4)38 (84.4)2 (66.7)
Age<65 years116 (74.4)49 (92.5)13 (81.2)4 (80.0)23 (67.6)25 (55.6)2 (66.7)p = 0.002
≥65 years40 (25.6)4 (7.5)3 (18.8)1 (20.0)11 (32.4)20 (44.4)1 (33.3)
T stage138 (24.4)6 (11.3)8 (50.0)0 (0.0)5 (14.7)18 (40)1 (33.3)p < 0.001
240 (25.6)9 (17)4 (25.0)3 (60.0)16 (47.1)8 (17.8)0 (0.0)
350 (32.1)31 (58.5)4 (25.0)1 (20.0)6 (17.6)7 (15.6)1 (33.3)
428 (17.9)7 (13.2)0 (0.0)1 (20.0)7 (20.6)12 (26.7)1 (33.3)
N stage082 (52.6)14 (26.4)5 (31.2)4 (80.0)18 (52.9)40 (88.9)1 (33.3)p < 0.001
130 (19.2)15 (28.3)7 (43.8)0 (0.0)6 (17.6)1 (2.2)1 (33.3)
240 (25.6)21 (39.6)3 (18.8)1 (20.0)10 (29.4)4 (8.9)1 (33.3)
34 (2.6)3 (5.7)1 (6.2)0 (0.0)0 (0)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
TNM stage126 (16.7)2 (3.8)3 (18.8)0 (0.0)3 (8.8)18 (40)0 (0.0)p < 0.001
224 (15.4)4 (7.5)1 (6.2)2 (40.0)9 (26.5)8 (17.8)0 (0.0)
344 (28.2)20 (37.7)8 (50)1 (20.0)7 (20.6)7 (15.6)1 (33.3)
462 (39.7)27 (50.9)4 (25)2 (40.0)15 (44.1)12 (26.7)2 (66.7)
Grade of differentiation120 (12.8)4 (7.5)0 (0.0)2 (40.0)3 (8.8)11 (24.4)0 (0.0)p = 0.270
254 (34.6)17 (32.1)6 (37.5)1 (20.0)15 (44.1)14 (31.1)1 (33.3)
337 (23.7)11 (20.8)4 (25)1 (20.0)9 (26.5)11 (24.4)1 (33.3)
42 (1.3)0 (0.0)1 (6.2)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)1 (2.2)0 (0.0)
Unknown43 (27.6)21 (39.6)5 (31.2)1 (20.0)7 (20.6)8 (17.8)1 (33.3)
Platelets-to-lymphocytes ratio<10772 (46.2)15 (28.3)12 (75.0)2 (40.0)16 (47.1)26 (57.8)1 (33.3)p = 0.011
≥10784 (53.8)38 (71.7)4 (25.0)3 (60.0)18 (52.9)19 (42.4)2 (66.7)
Neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio<3,9125 (80.1)39 (73.6)15 (93.8)4 (80.0)26 (76.5)38 (84.4)3 (100.0)p = 0.435
≥3,931 (19.9)14 (26.4)1 (6.2)1 (20.0)8 (23.5)7 (15.6)0 (0.0)
5-year mortalityDeceased58 (37.2)28 (52.8)4 (25.0)1 (20.0)16 (47.1)8 (17.8)1 (33.3)p = 0.01 *
Total 1565316534453
* log-rank test.
Table
Table 2. Multivariate Cox regression analysis of five-year and of tumour-specific mortality, and of tumour recurrence.
Table 2. Multivariate Cox regression analysis of five-year and of tumour-specific mortality, and of tumour recurrence.
Overall MortalityTumour-Specific MortalityTumour Recurrence
PLR≥1071.499 1.499 1.651
NLR≥3.9 2.122 * 2.122 * 1.800
PLR and NLR aggregatelyPLR ≥ 107 and NLR < 3.9 1.153 1.153 1.435
PLR ≥ 107 and NLR ≥ 3.9 2.291 * 2.291 * 2.180 *
Age a≥65 years0.9061.0451.0180.9061.0451.0180.8250.8760.860
Gender bMale2.4602.730 *2.732 *2.4602.730 *2.732 *3.530 **3.809 **3.840 **
Stage c26.690 g6.802 g6.6166.690 g6.802 g6.6162.1982.2692.175
37.315 g7.698 g7.4397.315 g7.698 g7.4391.2931.4431.306
414.44 *g13.40 *g12.87 *14.44 *g13.40 *g12.87 *2.5912.733 *2.447
Grade of differentiation d21.7781.9111.9411.7781.9111.9414.274 *4.518 *4.741 *
31.3411.5341.5401.3411.5341.5402.5392.7622.854
4------4.1594.0204.845
Unknown1.9542.2102.2371.9542.2102.2372.9773.2723.393
Location eOropharynx0.8170.7960.8330.8170.7960.8331.2851.1961.331
Oral cavity0.5460.5490.5590.5460.5490.55912.29 **13.21 **13.30 **
Sub-/supraglottis1.2211.1521.1891.2211.1521.1891.3301.1601.264
Glottis0.6310.5600.5770.6310.5600.5771.1000.9911.064
Multiple locations0.4750.5950.5930.4750.5950.5930.6330.6180.676
RBC 0.503 *0.508 **0.509 **0.503 *0.508 **0.509 **0.508 **0.512 **0.510 **
Platelet count f≥400 G/L0.9061.0451.0180.9061.0451.0180.8250.8760.860
Number of patients 156156156156156156148148148
The table shows hazard ratios; values over 1 indicate an enhanced risk. a Base: <65 years, b Base: Female, c Base: Stage 1, d Base: Grade 1, e Base: Hypopharynx, f Base: <400 G/L, g Wald-test p < 0.05, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Szilasi, Z.; Jósa, V.; Zrubka, Z.; Mezei, T.; Vass, T.; Merkel, K.; Helfferich, F.; Baranyai, Z. Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte and Platelet-To-Lymphocyte Ratios as Prognostic Markers of Survival in Patients with Head and Neck Tumours—Results of a Retrospective Multicentric Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1742. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051742

AMA Style

Szilasi Z, Jósa V, Zrubka Z, Mezei T, Vass T, Merkel K, Helfferich F, Baranyai Z. Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte and Platelet-To-Lymphocyte Ratios as Prognostic Markers of Survival in Patients with Head and Neck Tumours—Results of a Retrospective Multicentric Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(5):1742. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051742

Chicago/Turabian Style

Szilasi, Zsuzsanna, Valéria Jósa, Zsombor Zrubka, Tünde Mezei, Tamás Vass, Keresztély Merkel, Frigyes Helfferich, and Zsolt Baranyai. 2020. "Neutrophil-To-Lymphocyte and Platelet-To-Lymphocyte Ratios as Prognostic Markers of Survival in Patients with Head and Neck Tumours—Results of a Retrospective Multicentric Study" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 5: 1742. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051742

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop