Next Article in Journal
“Are Filipinos Aging Well?”: Determinants of Subjective Well-Being among Senior Citizens of the Community-Based ENGAGE Study
Next Article in Special Issue
Understanding the Intersection of Race/Ethnicity, Socioeconomic Status, and Geographic Location: A Scoping Review of U.S. Consumer Food Purchasing
Previous Article in Journal
Exploration of the Evaluation and Optimization of Community Epidemic Prevention in Wuhan Based on a DEA Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Model Depicting the Retail Food Environment and Customer Interactions: Components, Outcomes, and Future Directions
Article

Urban vs. Rural Socioeconomic Differences in the Nutritional Quality of Household Packaged Food Purchases by Store Type

The Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(20), 7637; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207637
Received: 1 September 2020 / Revised: 8 October 2020 / Accepted: 16 October 2020 / Published: 20 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Retail Strategies to Support Healthy Eating)
The U.S. food system is rapidly changing, including the growth of mass merchandisers and dollar stores, which may impact the quality of packaged food purchases (PFPs). Furthermore, diet-related disparities exist by socioeconomic status (SES) and rural residence. We use data from the 2010–2018 Nielsen Homescan Panel to describe the nutritional profiles of PFPs by store type and to assess whether these vary by household urbanicity and SES. Store types include grocery stores, mass merchandisers, club stores, online shopping, dollar stores, and convenience/drug stores. Food and beverage groups contributing the most calories at each store type are estimated using survey-weighted means, while the associations of urbanicity and SES with nutritional quality are estimated using multivariate regression. We find that households that are customers at particular store types purchase the same quality of food regardless of urbanicity or SES. However, we find differences in the quality of foods between store types and that the quantity of calories purchased at each store type varies according to household urbanicity and SES. Rural shoppers tend to shop more at mass merchandisers and dollar stores with less healthful PFPs. We discuss implications for the types of store interventions most relevant for improving the quality of PFPs. View Full-Text
Keywords: diet quality; nutrition; diet disparities; urban; rural; socioeconomic; income disparities; consumer packaged goods; packaged foods diet quality; nutrition; diet disparities; urban; rural; socioeconomic; income disparities; consumer packaged goods; packaged foods
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Lacko, A.; Ng, S.W.; Popkin, B. Urban vs. Rural Socioeconomic Differences in the Nutritional Quality of Household Packaged Food Purchases by Store Type. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7637. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207637

AMA Style

Lacko A, Ng SW, Popkin B. Urban vs. Rural Socioeconomic Differences in the Nutritional Quality of Household Packaged Food Purchases by Store Type. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(20):7637. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207637

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lacko, Allison, Shu W. Ng, and Barry Popkin. 2020. "Urban vs. Rural Socioeconomic Differences in the Nutritional Quality of Household Packaged Food Purchases by Store Type" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 20: 7637. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207637

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop