Next Article in Journal
Promoting Positive Psychology Using Social Networking Sites: A Study of New College Entrants on Facebook
Next Article in Special Issue
Drinking Water Management: Health Risk Perceptions and Choices in First Nations and Non-First Nations Communities in Canada
Previous Article in Journal
Biofilm Formation and Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Staphylococcus epidermidis Strains from a Hospital Environment
Previous Article in Special Issue
Risk Factors Associated with the Choice to Drink Bottled Water and Tap Water in Rural Saskatchewan
Article

Drinking Water Quality Guidelines across Canadian Provinces and Territories: Jurisdictional Variation in the Context of Decentralized Water Governance

by 1,*, 1,2 and 1,3
1
Program on Water Governance, University of British Columbia, 439-2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada
2
Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, 120-1984 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z2, Canada
3
Institute of Resources Environment and Sustainability, 421-2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11(5), 4634-4651; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110504634
Received: 17 February 2014 / Revised: 8 April 2014 / Accepted: 17 April 2014 / Published: 25 April 2014
This article presents the first comprehensive review and analysis of the uptake of the Canadian Drinking Water Quality Guidelines (CDWQG) across Canada’s 13 provinces and territories. This review is significant given that Canada’s approach to drinking water governance is: (i) highly decentralized and (ii) discretionary. Canada is (along with Australia) only one of two Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) member states that does not comply with the World Health Organization’s (WHO) recommendation that all countries have national, legally binding drinking water quality standards. Our review identifies key differences in the regulatory approaches to drinking water quality across Canada’s 13 jurisdictions. Only 16 of the 94 CDWQG are consistently applied across all 13 jurisdictions; five jurisdictions use voluntary guidelines, whereas eight use mandatory standards. The analysis explores three questions of central importance for water managers and public health officials: (i) should standards be uniform or variable; (ii) should compliance be voluntary or legally binding; and (iii) should regulation and oversight be harmonized or delegated? We conclude with recommendations for further research, with particular reference to the relevance of our findings given the high degree of variability in drinking water management and oversight capacity between urban and rural areas in Canada. View Full-Text
Keywords: drinking water guidelines; drinking water standards; decentralized water governance; water policy; heterogeneity; Canada drinking water guidelines; drinking water standards; decentralized water governance; water policy; heterogeneity; Canada
MDPI and ACS Style

Dunn, G.; Bakker, K.; Harris, L. Drinking Water Quality Guidelines across Canadian Provinces and Territories: Jurisdictional Variation in the Context of Decentralized Water Governance. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 4634-4651. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110504634

AMA Style

Dunn G, Bakker K, Harris L. Drinking Water Quality Guidelines across Canadian Provinces and Territories: Jurisdictional Variation in the Context of Decentralized Water Governance. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2014; 11(5):4634-4651. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110504634

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dunn, Gemma, Karen Bakker, and Leila Harris. 2014. "Drinking Water Quality Guidelines across Canadian Provinces and Territories: Jurisdictional Variation in the Context of Decentralized Water Governance" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11, no. 5: 4634-4651. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110504634

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop