Next Article in Journal
Performance of the Sardinia Radio Telescope Using the Dual-Polarized Cryogenic C-Low Receiver in the 4.2–5.6 GHz Frequency Band
Previous Article in Journal
Correction: Xu et al. MC-ASFF-ShipYOLO: Improved Algorithm for Small-Target and Multi-Scale Ship Detection for Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Images. Sensors 2025, 25, 2940
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sensors
Volume 26
Issue 2
10.3390/s26020697
sensors-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Correction to Sensors 2025, 25(16), 5122.
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Correction

Correction: Suzuki, K.; Ito, T. Virtual Observation Using Location-Dependent Statistical Information of Cyclists’ Movement for Estimation of Position and Uncertainty. Sensors 2025, 25, 5122

by
Kento Suzuki
and
Takuma Ito
*
Graduate School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2026, 26(2), 697; https://doi.org/10.3390/s26020697
Submission received: 26 December 2025 / Accepted: 4 January 2026 / Published: 21 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Navigation and Positioning)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes
An implementation mistake was found in our simulation program which makes minor changes in some figures and a table in the original publication [1].

Figure Correction

In the original publication [1], there were mistakes in Figures 23 and 25–29. The corrected version of the figures are provided below.
Sensors 26 00697 g023
Figure 23. Estimated results of data 22 in Cluster 2 using the proposed method.
Figure 23. Estimated results of data 22 in Cluster 2 using the proposed method.
Sensors 26 00697 g023
Sensors 26 00697 g025
Figure 25. Estimated results of data 11 in Cluster 2 using the proposed method.
Figure 25. Estimated results of data 11 in Cluster 2 using the proposed method.
Sensors 26 00697 g025
Sensors 26 00697 g026
Figure 26. Comparison of estimated velocity error between conventional and proposed methods. The blue boxes in the left graph indicate the interquartile range, and the red lines inside the blue box indicate the median. The red plus signs in the graphs indicate the outliers.
Figure 26. Comparison of estimated velocity error between conventional and proposed methods. The blue boxes in the left graph indicate the interquartile range, and the red lines inside the blue box indicate the median. The red plus signs in the graphs indicate the outliers.
Sensors 26 00697 g026
Sensors 26 00697 g027
Figure 27. Comparison of estimated offset error between conventional and proposed methods. The blue boxes in the left graph indicate the interquartile range, and the red lines inside the blue box indicate the median. The red plus signs in the graphs indicate the outliers.
Figure 27. Comparison of estimated offset error between conventional and proposed methods. The blue boxes in the left graph indicate the interquartile range, and the red lines inside the blue box indicate the median. The red plus signs in the graphs indicate the outliers.
Sensors 26 00697 g027
Sensors 26 00697 g028
Figure 28. Comparison of velocity uncertainty between conventional and proposed methods. The blue boxes in the left graph indicate the interquartile range, and the red lines inside the blue box indicate the median. The red plus signs in the graphs indicate the outliers.
Figure 28. Comparison of velocity uncertainty between conventional and proposed methods. The blue boxes in the left graph indicate the interquartile range, and the red lines inside the blue box indicate the median. The red plus signs in the graphs indicate the outliers.
Sensors 26 00697 g028
Sensors 26 00697 g029
Figure 29. Comparison of offset uncertainty between conventional and proposed methods. The blue boxes in the left graph indicate the interquartile range, and the red lines inside the blue box indicate the median.
Figure 29. Comparison of offset uncertainty between conventional and proposed methods. The blue boxes in the left graph indicate the interquartile range, and the red lines inside the blue box indicate the median.
Sensors 26 00697 g029

Table Correction

In the original publication [1], there were mistakes in Table 3. The corrected version of the table is provided below.
Table 3. Average ratio within 95% confidence interval in the state estimation with wrong classification.
Table 3. Average ratio within 95% confidence interval in the state estimation with wrong classification.
GT ClusterCluster 1 (5 Data)Cluster 2 (9 Data)Cluster 3 (15 Data)
Classified Cluster123123123
CorrectWrongWrongWrongCorrectWrongWrongWrongCorrect
Average ratio within the confidence intervalVelocity0.900.720.380.650.920.890.440.460.94
Offset0.770.650.360.570.930.830.240.150.93
The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original article has been updated. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.

Reference

  1. Suzuki, K.; Ito, T. Virtual Observation Using Location-Dependent Statistical Information of Cyclists’ Movement for Estimation of Position and Uncertainty. Sensors 2025, 25, 5122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Suzuki, K.; Ito, T. Correction: Suzuki, K.; Ito, T. Virtual Observation Using Location-Dependent Statistical Information of Cyclists’ Movement for Estimation of Position and Uncertainty. Sensors 2025, 25, 5122. Sensors 2026, 26, 697. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26020697

AMA Style

Suzuki K, Ito T. Correction: Suzuki, K.; Ito, T. Virtual Observation Using Location-Dependent Statistical Information of Cyclists’ Movement for Estimation of Position and Uncertainty. Sensors 2025, 25, 5122. Sensors. 2026; 26(2):697. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26020697

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suzuki, Kento, and Takuma Ito. 2026. "Correction: Suzuki, K.; Ito, T. Virtual Observation Using Location-Dependent Statistical Information of Cyclists’ Movement for Estimation of Position and Uncertainty. Sensors 2025, 25, 5122" Sensors 26, no. 2: 697. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26020697

APA Style

Suzuki, K., & Ito, T. (2026). Correction: Suzuki, K.; Ito, T. Virtual Observation Using Location-Dependent Statistical Information of Cyclists’ Movement for Estimation of Position and Uncertainty. Sensors 2025, 25, 5122. Sensors, 26(2), 697. https://doi.org/10.3390/s26020697

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop