AIoT-Based Eyelash Extension Durability Evaluation Using LabVIEW Data Analysis
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Literature Review
2.1. Development Trends in Eyelash Extension Makeup Durability Assessment Methods
2.2. Application of AI and Image Recognition Technology in Eyelash Extension Testing
2.3. Development of AIoT Applications in Eyelash Extension Durability Assessment
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Selection of Experimental Variable Parameters
3.2. CNN Model Architecture and Evaluation
- Model Architecture
- 2.
- Dataset and Labeling
- 3.
- Training, Validation, and Testing
- 4.
- Performance Evaluation
3.3. Establishment of Experimental Apparatus and System Architecture
3.3.1. Experimental System Design
- Integration of the data acquisition system (DAQ):(1) Utilizing NI DAQ and Arduino, capturing temperature, wind speed, and step-motor signals and recording; (2) LabVIEW functions as the intermediary software, performing real-time data visualization and storage, while transmitting collected data to a cloud-based analytical platform.
- Experimental parameter configuration and control [11]: The LabVIEW user interface allows for parameter configuration, including (1) Temperature: 15 °C, 25 °C, 35 °C; (2) Compression frequency: 1000, 3000, 5000 repetitions; (3) Wind speed: 3.4–5.4 m/s, 10.8–13.8 m/s, 20.8–24.4 m/s; (4) LabVIEW transmits signals to the Arduino master controller, which drives stepper motors and fan modules accordingly.
- Image capture and automated control: (1) Every 10 min, the camera module captures images of the eyelash extension module; (2) Captured images are timestamped and synchronized with experimental conditions, serving as AI-based image analysis data for subsequent comparisons.
3.3.2. Experimental System Components
- Simulated eyelash device: The core module of the system, designed to mimic the physical response of eyelash extensions in real-world applications, including (1) a sensor unit that detects electrochemical signal output (Vo1) related to eyelash compression deformation as shown in Figure 2; (2) a readout circuit, consisting of (a) three operational amplifiers LM741 (A1, A2, A3) forming an instrumentation amplifier that amplifies the weak voltage differential from the sensor (Vo1) and (b) resistors (R1, R2, R3) incorporated to set gain parameters for signal amplification; (3) a data acquisition module (DAQ) that (a) converts the amplified signal (Vo) into digital data and transmits it to a computer running LabVIEW software for processing and (b) simultaneously feeds acquired data into control components for system adjustments; (4) a LabVIEW system DAC: the core control software of the experiment, responsible for data reception, image synchronization, experimental parameter adjustments, and environmental condition control (e.g., compression retention rate, temperature, and wind speed simulation); (5) a bending simulation control module that (a) uses a stepper motor to rotate and manipulate eyelash extensions, replicating mechanical friction from blinking motions and (b) includes a heating fan and anemometer, which adjust temperature and wind speed, simulating various outdoor environmental conditions. The AIoTEDP modules and parameters are summarized as follows:
- Wind speed simulation module (fan + anemometer + voltage control)
- 3.
- Temperature simulation module (heating carpet + thermistor + thermostat)
- 4.
- AIoT sensor feedback system (image capture + cloud analysis)
- 5.
- Human–machine interface (LCD + control knob)
3.3.3. Layout of Experimental Apparatus and Experimental Materials
- (a)
- Stepper motor assembly. (Tricore Corporation, Changhua, Taiwan)
- (b)
- Eyelash extension device module and materials. (Cyber Lashes, Taipei, Taiwan)
- (c)
- Thermostatic device and temperature controller. (Thermoway Industrial Co., Ltd.)
- (d)
- Heating carpet. (Formosa FCFC Carpet Corporation, Changhua, Taiwan)
- (e)
- Microcomputer (with LabVIEW) and sensor interface.
- (f)
- Adjustable electric hair dryer. (Shengyi Technology Co., Ltd., Taipei, Taiwan)
- (g)
- Anemometer (AZ Instrument Co., Ltd., Taichung, Taiwan) and Apple iPhone 16.
3.4. Experimental Methods and Procedures
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Three-Factor Full Factorial Experimental Analysis
4.1.1. Temperature Effect Analysis and Discussion
4.1.2. Analysis and Discussion of Wind Speed Effects
4.1.3. Analysis and Discussion of Compression Frequency
4.1.4. Analysis of Temperature, Wind Speed, and Compression Frequency Trends on Eyelash Extension Retention Rate
- Under a fixed compression frequency, an increase in temperature significantly reduces eyelash extension retention rate.
- Under a fixed temperature condition, increasing compression cycles from 1000 to 3000 results in minimal change in the retention rate, but beyond 5000 cycles, the retention rate drops noticeably.
- The optimal retention rate is observed within the temperature range of 15 °C to 25 °C, with compression cycles centered around 3000 repetitions.
- The worst combination for retention rate occurs under 35 °C temperature and 5000 compression cycles, coupled with high wind speed conditions.
4.2. LabVIEW Experimental Analysis
4.2.1. Effects of Temperature and Wind Speed on Eyelash Extension Retention Rate Under Fixed Compression Frequency (1000 Cycles)
- The variation in the average eyelash extension retention rate waveform is influenced by temperature.
- (1)
- As temperature increases, the waveform exhibits an upward trend, suggesting that heat causes the adhesive layer to soften or enhances electrochemical activity, leading to a higher detected voltage.
- (2)
- This trend aligns with the findings in Table 1, where the retention rate significantly decreases at high temperatures (35 °C).
- (3)
- Higher temperatures may activate the adhesive, reducing overall bonding durability as environmental temperature rises.
- 2.
- The amplitude of the retention rate waveform is not correlated with wind speed.
4.2.2. Effects of Temperature and Wind Speed on Eyelash Extension Retention Rate Under Fixed Compression Frequency (3000 Cycles)
- The Relationship Between Voltage Waveforms, Temperature, and Wind Speed Is Nonlinear.
- (1)
- Higher temperatures result in lower sensor voltage amplitude.
As shown in Figure 6, when the ambient temperature increases from 15 °C to 35 °C, the peak-to-peak voltage amplitude of the sensor output significantly decreases. However, this trend is nonlinear—rather than a gradual decline, a sharp amplitude compression occurs at 35 °C, suggesting a potential adhesive failure in the eyelash extension bond.- (2)
- The correlation between voltage amplitude and wind speed also exhibits a nonlinear relationship.
The voltage waveform amplitude stabilizes at high wind speed (22 m/s), indicating reduced structural responsiveness to mechanical interference and deterioration of the adhesive mechanism. At low-to-moderate wind speeds, voltage amplitude fluctuations remain relatively smooth, suggesting that the adhesive maintains responsiveness to mid-range air pressure, exhibiting a threshold effect.- (3)
- The correlation between eyelash retention rate and voltage waveforms is not a linear decline.
Interestingly, under 3000 compression cycles, certain conditions (e.g., 15 °C + 4 m/s) result in a higher retention rate than 1000 compression cycles (87.6% vs. 92.5%), which contradicts conventional material science principles. - Discussion on the Nonlinear Relationship Between Voltage Waveforms, Temperature, and Wind Speed.Based on detailed observations of experimental processes and variations, the researchers identified three possible causes for the nonlinear effects seen in voltage waveforms relative to temperature and wind speed:
- (1)
- Mechanical redistribution: A total of 3000 compression cycles generates moderate mechanical stimulation, leading to a more uniform distribution of the adhesive across the eyelash base. Increased bonding surface area enhances the retention rate. This reflects a “moderate stress activation” effect, stabilizing voltage waveforms while slightly increasing voltage amplitude.
- (2)
- Thermal softening-induced adhesive failure: At high temperatures (35 °C), the adhesive softens or exhibits enhanced thixotropic properties, losing its stress-response capability. This results in a significant decrease in waveform amplitude, resembling the rheological behaviors of non-Newtonian fluids.
- (3)
- Shear-rate dependent fatigue from wind speed interference: High wind speeds cause localized shear stress concentrations, accelerating adhesive fatigue. Voltage response waveforms stabilize, indicating diminished bonding integrity. This finding exhibits a nonlinear relationship, where wind speed does not directly correlate with adhesive deterioration but displays threshold-based failure characteristics.
4.2.3. Effects of Temperature and Wind Speed on Eyelash Extension Retention Rate Under Fixed Compression Frequency (5000 Cycles)
- As environmental conditions worsen (high temperature and high wind speed), sensor voltage amplitude decreases significantly, and the waveform flattens.
- This finding indicates progressive adhesive failure, where the response capability of the eyelash extension adhesive to external interference is noticeably reduced. However, it might provide early warning indicators for adhesive deterioration, offering valuable insights into durability loss.
4.2.4. Voltage Waveform Trends Under Fixed Temperature (25 °C) and Wind Speed (12 m/s) for Different Compression Cycles
4.3. Analysis and Discussion of Results from the Three-Factor Full Factorial Experimental Design
4.3.1. Experimental Design and Research Hypotheses
4.3.2. ANOVA Model Construction
4.3.3. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA)
- Each factor—temperature, wind speed, and compression cycles—exhibits an apparent main effect with a distinct trend. Temperature has the greatest influence, followed by compression cycles and wind speed.
- Interactions exist among the three factors: under the conditions of 35 °C, 5000 compression cycles, and 20.8~24.4 m/s wind speed, the eyelash extension retention rate reaches its lowest value (61.7%).
- The consistency across three repeated measurements is high, with minimal error margins, confirming the reliability of the data.
4.3.4. Experimental Findings and Discussion
- Independent Effects of Environmental and Control Variables.
- (1)
- Temperature: High temperatures (35 °C) significantly reduce eyelash extension durability, especially when combined with high wind speed or frequent compression cycles. Under these extreme conditions, the lowest recorded retention rate was 61.7%. This finding aligns with previous research [33], which reports that eyelash extension adhesive softens at high temperatures, reducing adhesion strength.
- (2)
- Wind speed: Although a less dominant factor, strong winds (20.8~24.8 m/s) still contributed to a 3%–5% decrease in retention rate. This result suggests that outdoor exposure to wind-induced friction may cause a cumulative negative impact on eyelash extension durability; this finding is consistent with the results of Cheng et al. (2020) [11].
- (3)
- Compression cycles: A nonlinear effect was observed, marking an important discovery in this study.
- 2.
- Potential Effects of Interaction Terms.
- 3.
- Implications on the Value after the AIoTEDP is Verified
5. Conclusions and Future Research Recommendations
5.1. Conclusions
5.1.1. Summary of Findings
- Temperature exhibits a negative correlation with eyelash extension durability:
- (1)
- The experimental results indicate that temperature significantly impacts durability (F = 35.21, p < 0.001).
- (2)
- Under high-temperature conditions (35 °C), the retention rate declines noticeably, with more severe degradation occurring when combined with high wind speed and increased compression cycles.
- Wind speed also negatively affects eyelash extension durability:
- (1)
- Although its effect is less significant than temperature and compression cycles, it is still statistically significant (p < 0.01).
- (2)
- Strong winds (20.8~24.4 m/s) accelerate eyelash extension detachment, especially in high-temperature environments.
- Moderate compression cycles result in the best retention rate:
- (1)
- Moderate compression (3000 cycles) produces a retention rate similar to the lower compression level (1000 cycles).
- (2)
- However, excessive compression (5000 cycles) leads to structural damage, significantly reducing makeup durability.
- The interaction effects among the three factors are not statistically significant:
5.1.2. Commercial Value of the AIoT Experimental Device Platform
- Compression cycles significantly influence the retention rate’s voltage waveform amplitude and durability.
- (1)
- When eyelash extensions undergo 1000 compression cycles, the voltage oscillation waveform remains distinct and stable, indicating good adhesive performance.
- (2)
- As compression cycles increase to 3000 and 5000, the waveform gradually flattens and amplitude decreases significantly, demonstrating a damping effect.
- (3)
- This reflects the progressive deterioration of the adhesive’s electrical conductivity and structural integrity due to repetitive mechanical fatigue.
- 2.
- Retention rate voltage waveforms can be early warning indicators of eyelash extension failure.
- (1)
- The study finds that when the waveform amplitude drops below 50% of the original peak-to-peak value, the corresponding retention rate falls below 80%.
- (2)
- This result indicates a strong correlation between retention rate waveform characteristics and adhesive condition.
- (3)
- This discovery provides a foundation for developing self-diagnosis digital detection modules, effectively monitoring equipment durability, and ensuring testing accuracy in future applications.
5.2. Research Limitations and Future Research Recommendations
- Expand the range of eyelash extension adhesives studied: Compare various commercial adhesive products’ physical and chemical properties to validate specific material responses.
- Enhance experimental conditions and increase sample diversity: (1) Introduce additional environmental factors such as humidity and ultraviolet exposure to simulate more complex real-world conditions. (2) Expand environmental parameters and evaluation criteria, including adhesive cracking patterns and warping angles.
- Apply the AIoTEDP to other cosmetic product testing: The proposed AIoTEDP can be a standardized durability testing system for various cosmetics, minimizing human subjectivity in evaluation. Integrating cloud-based data analytics, the AIoTEDP can build predictive models for makeup durability, helping manufacturers rapidly assess new product performance.
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Sullivan, Y.W.; Kim, D.J. Assessing the effects of consumers’ product evaluations and trust on repurchase intention in e-commerce environments. Int. J. Inf. Manage 2018, 39, 199–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Barthe, M.; Bavoux, C.; Finot, F.; Mouche, I.; Cuceu-Petrenci, C.; Forreryd, A.; Chérouvrier, H.A.; Johansson, H.; Lemkine, G.F.; Thénot, J.-P. Safety testing of cosmetic products: Overview of established methods and new approach methodologies (NAMs). Cosmetics 2021, 8, 50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Grupcheva, C.N.; Grupchev, D.I.; Usheva, N.; Grupcheva, L.O. Beauty versus health—How eyelash extensions may affect dry eye disease? J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 3101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Diwoux, A.; Gabriel, D.; Bardel, M.H.; Ben Khalifa, Y.; Billot, P.É. Neurophysiological approaches to exploring emotional responses to cosmetics: A systematic review of the literature. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2024, 18, 1443001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kwon, O.; Kim, J.Y.; Paik, S.H.; Jeon, H.C.; Jung, Y.J.; Lee, Y.; Baek, J.H.; Chun, J.H.; Lee, W.S.; Lee, J.Y.; et al. Long-term utility and durability of the therapeutic effects of bimatoprost 0.03% for eyelash augmentation in healthy Asian subjects. Dermatology 2014, 229, 222–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Villar, E.; Martín Toral, I.; Calvo, I.; Barambones, O.; Fernández-Bustamante, P. Architectures for industrial AIoT applications. Sensors 2024, 24, 4929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Saiwaeo, S.; Arwatchananukul, S.; Mungmai, L.; Preedalikit, M.; Aunsri, N. Human skin type classification using image processing and deep learning approaches. Heliyon 2023, 9, e21176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hou, K.M.; Diao, X.; Shi, H.; Ding, H.; Zhou, H.; de Vaulx, C. Trends and challenges in AIoT/IIoT/IoT implementation. Sensors 2023, 23, 5074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Yang, Y.; Shan, X.; Salam, B.; Lee, C. Artificial intelligence of things (AIoT) enabled floor monitoring system for smart home applications. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 18312–18326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, Y.C.; Chen, Y.M.; Chu, J.L. Taiwan’s climate change trends. Nat. Res. Technol. 2010, 25, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, K.-S.; Ho, C.-Y.; Teng, J.-H. Wind characteristics in the Taiwan Strait: A case study of the first offshore wind farm in Taiwan. Energies 2020, 13, 6492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdellatef, E.; Al-Makhlasawy, R.M.; Shalaby, W.A. Detection of human activities using multi-layer convolutional neural network. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 7004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Land, O.; Seider, W.D.; Lee, D. Convolutional neural network augmented soft-sensor for autonomous microfluidic production of uniform bubbles. Chem. Eng. J. 2024, 499, 156494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Raj, R.; Kos, A. An extensive study of convolutional neural networks: Applications in computer vision for improved robotics perceptions. Sensors 2025, 25, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Cui, K.; Rao, S.; Xu, S.; Huang, Y.; Cai, X.; Huang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Feng, X.; Liu, F.; Zhang, W.; et al. Spectral convolutional neural network chip for in-sensor edge computing of incoherent natural light. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Hui, R.S. LabVIEW 2024 Programming, 1st ed.; Chuan Hwa Books: Taipei, Taiwan, 2024; pp. 120–180. [Google Scholar]
- Gergič, B.; Hercog, D. An effective concept for teaching LabVIEW programming to engineering students. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 8506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, K.C.; Huang, W.T.; Chen, T.Y.; Wu, C.C.; Ho, W.S. Establishing an intelligent emotion analysis system for long-term care applications based on LabVIEW. Sustainability 2022, 14, 8932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, K.C.; Huang, W.T.; Hsieh, H.H.; Chen, T.Y.; Ho, W.S.; Fang, J.S.; Huang, W.L. Deep learning-based speech recognition and LabVIEW integration for intelligent mobile robot control. Actuators 2025, 14, 249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cuntan, C.; Panoiu, C.; Panoiu, M.; Baciu, I.; Mezinescu, S. Using the LabVIEW simulation program to design and determine the characteristics of amplifiers. Chips 2024, 3, 69–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuo, P.Y.; Wang, T.H.; Hsu, M.T.; Liao, C.H. Development of a flexible printed circuit board-based potentiometric urea biosensor combined with a power management circuit chip. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 113694–113703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuo, P.Y.; Liao, C.H.; Chou, J.C.; Lai, C.H.; Nien, Y.H.; Yang, P.H. The implementation of a high-performance glucose biosensor based on differential EGFET and chopper amplifier. IEEE J. Electron. Devices Soc. 2024, 12, 1003–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuo, P.Y.; Hsu, M.T.; Chou, J.C.; Lai, C.H.; Nien, Y.H.; Yang, P.H. The back-end calibration circuit for reducing hysteresis and drift effects of the potentiometric RuO2 dopamine biosensor. IEEE Trans. Nanotechnol. 2024, 23, 578–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chou, J.C.; Chen, Y.W.; Lai, C.H.; Yang, P.H.; Kuo, P.Y.; Nien, Y.H. Potentiometric acetylcholine biosensor based on molybdenum trioxide film-modified tungsten trioxide nanoparticles and dual-enzyme. IEEE Sens. J. 2024, 24, 33953–33961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bao, D.; Shi, Z.; Li, C.; Jiang, A.; Han, Q.; Luo, Y.; Zhang, S. A study on the influence of different inflow conditions on the output power and dynamic response characteristics of a variable pitch wind turbine structure. Energies 2024, 17, 5818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marchione, F. Thermal stresses in adhesively bonded joints: Numerical and analytical analysis. Eng. Sci. Technol. 2021, 2, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zarei, H.; Marulli, M.R.; Paggi, M.; Pietrogrande, R.; Üffing, C.; Weißgraeber, P. Adherent surface roughness effect on the mechanical response of adhesive joints. Appl. Phys. 2020, 2006, 06233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kinloch, A.J. The science of adhesion: Part 1, surface and interfacial aspects. J. Mater. Sci. 1980, 15, 2141–2166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen, Q.D.; Boger, D.V. Thixotropic behavior of concentrated bauxite residue suspensions. Rheol. Acta 1985, 24, 427–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, T.; Jiang, Y.; Ji, X. Interlayer bonding investigation of 3D printing cementitious materials with fluidity retaining polycarboxylate superplasticizer and high dispersion polycarboxylate superplasticizer. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 330, 127151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zarei, H.; Marulli, M.R.; Paggi, M.; Pietrogrande, R.; Üffing, C.; Weißgraeber, P. Mechanical characterization and failure modes in the peeling of adhesively bonded strips from a plastic substrate. Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct. 2022, 29, 1523–1528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mu, Z.; Li, Y.; Guo, W.; Shen, H.; Tagawa, K. An experimental study on the adhesion strength of offshore atmospheric icing on a wind turbine blade airfoil. Coatings 2023, 13, 164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bernaczyk, A.; Wagenführ, A.; Terfloth, C.; Lincke, J.; Krystofiak, T.; Niemz, P. Investigations into the influence of temperature on the tensile shear strength of various adhesives. Materials 2023, 16, 6173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Trial No. | Temperature (°C) | Compression Frequency | Wind Speed (m/s) | Retention Rate (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
One Data | Two Data | Three Data | ||||
1 | 15 | 1000 | 3.4–5.4 | 92.5 | 92.4 | 92.5 |
2 | 15 | 1000 | 10.8–13.8 | 90.1 | 90.2 | 90.0 |
3 | 15 | 1000 | 20.8–24.4 | 88.0 | 87.9 | 88.1 |
4 | 15 | 3000 | 3.4–5.4 | 87.6 | 86.9 | 87.8 |
5 | 15 | 3000 | 10.8–13.8 | 84.3 | 83.9 | 83.9 |
6 | 15 | 3000 | 20.8–24.4 | 81.7 | 81.6 | 81.6 |
7 | 15 | 5000 | 3.4–5.4 | 83.2 | 83.3 | 82.8 |
8 | 15 | 5000 | 10.8–13.8 | 79.5 | 79.2 | 79.3 |
9 | 15 | 5000 | 20.8–24.4 | 76.8 | 75.9 | 76.5 |
10 | 25 | 1000 | 3.4–5.4 | 89.1 | 88.9 | 89.1 |
11 | 25 | 1000 | 10.8–13.8 | 86.4 | 86.3 | 86.1 |
12 | 25 | 1000 | 20.8–24.4 | 84.2 | 84.6 | 84.4 |
13 | 25 | 3000 | 3.4–5.4 | 82.7 | 82.6 | 82.5 |
14 | 25 | 3000 | 10.8–13.8 | 78.9 | 78.6 | 78.7 |
15 | 25 | 3000 | 20.8–24.4 | 75.3 | 75.4 | 75.4 |
16 | 25 | 5000 | 3.4–5.4 | 77.6 | 77.6 | 77.3 |
17 | 25 | 5000 | 10.8–13.8 | 72.8 | 72.8 | 72.5 |
18 | 25 | 5000 | 20.8–24.4 | 69.5 | 69.3 | 69.6 |
19 | 35 | 1000 | 3.4–5.4 | 85.3 | 85.4 | 85.5 |
20 | 35 | 1000 | 10.8–13.8 | 81.9 | 81.5 | 81.7 |
21 | 35 | 1000 | 20.8–24.4 | 78.5 | 78.4 | 78.4 |
22 | 35 | 3000 | 3.4–5.4 | 76.1 | 76.0 | 75.9 |
23 | 35 | 3000 | 10.8–13.8 | 71.2 | 71.1 | 71.0 |
24 | 35 | 3000 | 20.8–24.4 | 67.5 | 67.5 | 67.1 |
25 | 35 | 5000 | 3.4–5.4 | 70.4 | 70.4 | 70.2 |
26 | 35 | 5000 | 10.8–13.8 | 65.1 | 65.0 | 64.8 |
27 | 35 | 5000 | 20.8–24.4 | 61.8 | 61.7 | 61.7 |
Compression Cycles | Baseline Voltage (Volts) | Peak-to-Peak Amplitude (Volts) | Waveform Durability | Interpretation |
---|---|---|---|---|
1000 | Approx. −0.09 | Approx. 0.12 | Clear waveform, stable amplitude. | Strong adhesive durability. |
3000 | Approx. −0.09 | Approx. 0.09 | Waveform slightly flattens, edges become dull. | The adhesive begins to deteriorate. |
5000 | Approx. −0.09 | Approx. 0.05 | Waveform flattens, with almost no visible oscillation. | Adhesive strength significantly declines, nearing. |
Factors | Degrees of Freedom (df) | Sum of Squares (SS) | Mean Square (MS) | F-Value | p-Value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Temperature (Temp) | 2 | 680.12 | 340.06 | 35.21 | <0.001 |
Wind Speed (Wind) | 2 | 148.67 | 74.34 | 8.56 | 0.002 |
Compression Cycles (Force) | 2 | 212.45 | 106.23 | 11.78 | <0.001 |
Temp × Force | 4 | 87.24 | 21.81 | 2.26 | 0.084 |
Temp × Wind | 4 | 64.12 | 16.03 | 1.86 | 0.133 |
Force × Wind | 4 | 59.38 | 14.85 | 1.65 | 0.162 |
Temp × Force × Wind | 8 | 45.71 | 5.71 | 0.89 | 0.527 |
Error | 54 | 520.18 | 9.63 | — | — |
Total | 80 | 1817.87 | — | — | — |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Chiang, S.; Chang, S.-H.; Yao, K.-C.; Kuo, P.-Y.; Hsu, C.-T. AIoT-Based Eyelash Extension Durability Evaluation Using LabVIEW Data Analysis. Sensors 2025, 25, 5057. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25165057
Chiang S, Chang S-H, Yao K-C, Kuo P-Y, Hsu C-T. AIoT-Based Eyelash Extension Durability Evaluation Using LabVIEW Data Analysis. Sensors. 2025; 25(16):5057. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25165057
Chicago/Turabian StyleChiang, Sumei, Shao-Hsun Chang, Kai-Chao Yao, Po-Yu Kuo, and Chien-Tai Hsu. 2025. "AIoT-Based Eyelash Extension Durability Evaluation Using LabVIEW Data Analysis" Sensors 25, no. 16: 5057. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25165057
APA StyleChiang, S., Chang, S.-H., Yao, K.-C., Kuo, P.-Y., & Hsu, C.-T. (2025). AIoT-Based Eyelash Extension Durability Evaluation Using LabVIEW Data Analysis. Sensors, 25(16), 5057. https://doi.org/10.3390/s25165057