Next Article in Journal
The Deformation Behavior and Bending Emissions of ZnO Microwire Affected by Deformation-Induced Defects and Thermal Tunneling Effect
Previous Article in Journal
Electrical Detection of Innate Immune Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
IMU-Based Effects Assessment of the Use of Foot Orthoses in the Stance Phase during Running and Asymmetry between Extremities
Communication

A Simple Low-Cost Electrocardiogram Synchronizer

1
School of Telecommunications Engineering, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, 08034 Barcelona, Spain
2
ICREC Research Program, Health Science Research Institute Germans Trias i Pujol, Can Ruti Campus, 08916 Badalona, Spain
3
CIBERCV, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, 28029 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: James F. Rusling
Sensors 2021, 21(17), 5885; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21175885
Received: 6 July 2021 / Revised: 24 August 2021 / Accepted: 28 August 2021 / Published: 1 September 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomedical Sensors-Recent Advances and Future Challenges)
Electrocardiogram (ECG) synchronization is useful to avoid the effects of cardiac motion in medical measurements, and is widely used in standard medical imaging. A number of medical equipment include embedded commercial synchronizers. However, the use of independent synchronization modules is sometimes needed when several non-integrated instruments are used, or in the development of new medical instruments and procedures. We present a simple low-cost ECG synchronizer module based on an Arduino controller board that converts the ECG signal into a transistor-transistor-logic (TTL) one, allowing real-time medical measurements triggered at specific phases of the cardiac cycle. The device and conversion algorithm developed is optimized in vitro using synthetic and human ECG signals, and tested in vivo on three swine specimens. Error rates during the in vivo testing stage remain below the 2% of the cycles in all animals and critical false positives are less than 1%, which is sufficient for most applications. Possible algorithm updates are discussed if its performance needs to be improved. View Full-Text
Keywords: biomedical signals; ECG; bioinstrumentation; synchronization; trigger; medical sensor development biomedical signals; ECG; bioinstrumentation; synchronization; trigger; medical sensor development
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Amorós, S.; Gálvez-Montón, C.; Rodríguez-Leor, O.; O’Callaghan, J.M. A Simple Low-Cost Electrocardiogram Synchronizer. Sensors 2021, 21, 5885. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21175885

AMA Style

Amorós S, Gálvez-Montón C, Rodríguez-Leor O, O’Callaghan JM. A Simple Low-Cost Electrocardiogram Synchronizer. Sensors. 2021; 21(17):5885. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21175885

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amorós, Susana, Carolina Gálvez-Montón, Oriol Rodríguez-Leor, and Juan M. O’Callaghan 2021. "A Simple Low-Cost Electrocardiogram Synchronizer" Sensors 21, no. 17: 5885. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21175885

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop