Next Article in Journal
Rebirth of Distributed AI—A Review of eHealth Research
Previous Article in Journal
Post-Drive Standing Balance of Vehicle Passengers Using Wearable Sensors: The Effect of On-Road Driving and Task Performance
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Lightweight Prototype of a Magnetometric System for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Application of Multispectral Imaging and Portable Spectroscopic Instruments to the Analysis of an Ancient Persian Illuminated Manuscript

1
Department of Cultural Heritage, University of Padova, Piazza Capitaniato 7, 35139 Padova, Italy
2
Department of Chemical Sciences, University of Padova, Via Marzolo 1, 35131 Padova, Italy
3
Interdepartmental Center for Research, Study and Conservation of Archaeological, Architectural and Historical-Artistic Heritage—CIBA, University of Padova, Piazza Capitaniato 7, 35139 Padova, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2021, 21(15), 4998; https://doi.org/10.3390/s21154998
Submission received: 11 June 2021 / Revised: 18 July 2021 / Accepted: 21 July 2021 / Published: 23 July 2021

Abstract

:
Illuminated manuscripts are, in general, the final products of a wise and complex interaction of different competencies. In particular, each manuscript reflects uses and techniques rooted in the historical and geographical traditions of the area of realization. Defining the characteristics and the materials in these valuable artefacts is an essential element to reconstruct their history and allow a more precise collocation and a possible comparison with other works in similar periods and areas. Non-invasive methods, mainly using portable instruments, offer undoubtedly good support in these studies. Recent analyses of an ancient Persian illuminated manuscript, combining multispectral imaging and spectroscopic measurements made with portable instruments (XRF, FORS, micro-Raman, IR-ATR) on selected points, provided new data for an improved understanding of this rare book. This study details the possibilities offered by combining these non-invasive methods for an in-depth understanding of the techniques and practices behind the realization of Middle Eastern illuminated manuscripts and provided new perspectives for multidisciplinary approaches to research in this field.

1. Introduction

Ancient illuminated manuscripts represent the result of broad, long-lasting collaboration among different competencies. Parchment and papermakers, bookbinders, scribes, and illuminators generally selected materials based on their knowledge [1]. Additionally, differences in traditions, historical contexts, and specific geographic areas often influenced the final product. Not surprisingly, the manuscript was then a precious and rare, generally unique artwork.
The intrinsic complexity that characterizes illuminated manuscripts describes the diversity of aspects that interest these artefacts from an artistic-historical and scientific-technical point of view. Non-invasive, portable techniques, developed and applied for the study of pictorial surfaces at larger scales, offer in this sense excellent support for the characterization and comparison of different manuscripts as well as the various materials used in the same manuscript.
For these studies, the most widely used methods are imaging techniques: multispectral and hyperspectral applications [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9] and spectroscopic techniques (e.g., XRF, FORS, Raman) using portable and lab equipment [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. In general, most of the scientific studies carried out thus far on manuscripts of different periods and geographical areas have concerned the analysis of the inks [21], the variety and distribution of pigments in the decorations, in some cases, the identification of the techniques of realization, and sporadically, the study of the paper.
Imaging techniques help identify qualitative differences (e.g., transparencies of pigments, underdrawings), whereas spectroscopic methods support defining elemental and molecular properties in single, selected points. The scientific literature shows that Western European manuscripts have been undoubtedly more extensively studied than the Middle Eastern (e.g., Persian, Arabian), only partially analyzed [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. The insufficient literature on these studies is probably due to the greater availability, and the consequent possibility of studying, European manuscripts compared to Oriental ones. In general, scientific analyses are possible and support the study and restoration works of these artefacts. However, the scientific literature reveals a lack of systematic multi-scale approaches based on the combined use of imaging techniques and single-point analyses. In general, multispectral imaging supports identifying underdrawings or pentimenti, whereas single-point analyses facilitate the specific characterization of different materials.
In this case study, we present some aspects of a broader study regarding a 17th century Persian manuscript analysis. In particular, we propose a multi-methodological approach (e.g., multispectral imaging, XRF, FORS, Raman) to demonstrate how the combination of different sensors and techniques can help, in similar contexts, to identify specific details of the decorative apparatus and paper characteristics. The characterization of different mixes and shades of colours, specifically greens, also represents another critical topic in this study. All the results of this multi-methodological study contribute to increasing the overall level of knowledge about this ancient Persian manuscript and, more generally, about Middle Eastern manuscripts still rarely studied in terms of materials and techniques.

2. Materials and Methods

The MS2522_23 Quintet (Khamse) of Nizami Ganjavi is a 17th century illuminated Persian manuscript containing 22 full-page miniatures, two diptychs (1 at the beginning and one at the end of the manuscript), many filigree initials, and finely decorated margins and gold/coloured frames between and around the dark text (Figure 1).
This valuable manuscript is a part of the Venetian Fondazione Cini Onlus collection and was analyzed with non-invasive portable methods during its restoration.
In particular, different portable techniques were applied to collect details and information on various pigments and colour blends, identify the characteristics of the paper, develop general information on the artists’ practices, and detect the presence of preparatory drawings or pentimenti.
Following a general to a particular approach, a large dataset of multispectral images covering all the miniatures was planned. This mapping aimed to identify at a general, macroscopic, and qualitative level the main features in the decorative apparatus and the differences among the scenes. Thanks to this preliminary screening, it was possible to identify similar chromatic areas with different spectral responses. In this way, it was possible to choose the specific points of interest to carry out in-depth spectroscopic investigations.
In the context of the analysis of ancient documents and, in particular, in the recovery of details on images, the use of multispectral imaging reveals enormous potential.
Indeed, there are several examples in the recent literature of using this technique in the ultraviolet (UV) and infrared (IR) bands. This method is applied for text retrieval on reuse sheets [4], for the identification of executive details on illuminated documents [9], then for recovering the legibility of text and images on sheets and writing different media that have been blackened for various reasons [5], while also passing through the analysis of specific details on the paper/material used as a support for writing.
A NIKON D800 FR modified reflex camera, 2 NIKON sb-910 flashes, and five specific optical band-cutting filters [6] were used for multispectral analysis.
The removal of the UV and IR band cutter filters applied in the sensor of the reflex cameras restores the complete sensitivity in the range of 300–1000 nm. In this range, the use of filters placed in front of the lens allows one to take pictures of individual bands (UV, VIS, IR), obtaining valuable information on details regarding the state, conditions not visible to the naked eye.
Micro-Raman, fiber optics reflectance spectroscopy (FORS), and X-ray fluorescence (XRF) are generally applied for molecular and elemental characterization of pigments. In particular, in this case, we used two different micro-Raman instruments to analyze selected points in the manuscript. First of all, a portable BWTEK i-Raman Plus instrument equipped with a laser line at 785 nm and a BAC100 probe connected to a microscope were used. Output power was reduced by 50 dB by an external attenuator to avoid any possible damage. A microscope magnification of 4× or 10× was applied. Raman spectra were collected in the range 150–3350 cm−1, with 100 accumulations (1 s/acc).
A second micro-Raman spectrometer, Renishaw InVia, equipped with a Leica DM-LM microscope and with laser lines at 514 nm and 633 nm, was also used. Magnification was 20×, with ten accumulations (10 s/acc). For both micro-Raman instruments, the same wavelength range was selected.
A portable μ-XRF Bruker ARTAX 200, equipped with a Mo anode source, adjustable tripod and probe head, spotting areas less than 0.1 mm diameter, was used for XRF analysis. The voltage was set to 45 kV and current to 700 mA; acquisition time was 2 min per spectrum.
FORS acquisitions were carried out with portable equipment consisting of a UV-VIS Xenon lamp connected to a flexible probe encompassing 6 quartz fibers for illumination and a single central quartz fiber to collect the light diffused by the sampled point.
The collected light was fed into an Ocean Optics HR2000+ spectrophotometer through the primary fiber, whose detection range was 300–900 nm. The illumination spot was 3 mm in diameter, acquisition time 40 ms per accumulation, 30 scans, with a boxcar noise filter set to 20.
A total of 50 sampling points were collected in spectroscopic analyses, with a broader investigation (19 points) on the first diptych (folios f. 2r–f. 2v), representing the feast of the Sultan (Figure 2). These folios contained a rich palette, covering most of the colours/pigments used in the entire manuscript. The other sampling points were distributed in different miniatures (Figure 3) to characterize blue and green colours, focusing mainly on greens, which appeared quite different, starting from the evidence registered by multispectral imaging (Figure 4).
During the restoration, some folios were temporarily removed, permitting FTIR spectroscopy analysis to characterize the materials. The used range of FTIR spectra was 600–4500 cm−1, 32 scans, pseudo-absorbance mode, and ATR correction.

3. Results

3.1. White Paper Analysis

Multispectral imaging of white areas in two different folios (f. 285r and f. 285v) enhanced the detection of grooves deriving from the looms used for paper preparation (Figure 5 and Figure 6).
The type and texture of grooves is a relevant codicological parameter to establish the kind of paper, i.e., if the paper was of European or Islamic production [33]. ATR-IR was applied on white areas to characterize the materials used in paper manufacture.
The nature and type of grooves, quite dense and uniform, revealed by the multispectral analysis (Figure 5 and Figure 6), suggest an Islamic production. Additionally, in all the examined folios, no watermarks were identified, indicating the likely Islamic output of the paper.
ATR-IR measurements were carried out on white areas of both removed folios (f. 285r and f. 285v).
For all sampled areas, the IR spectra appeared very similar (Figure 7a) and typical of cellulose, the main component of paper. The strong peak at 1023 cm−1, due to C-O stretching mode, the complicated pattern between 1200 and 1400 cm−1, and the strong broadband between 3000 and 3500 cm−1, due to OH stretching mode, are specific for cellulose. The 1023 peak was structured in distinct, sharp peaks related to the different C-O bonds in cellulose, indicating a good quality paper without degradation. Moreover, the OH band was characterized by small features around 3400 and 3500 cm−1, related to slightly different OH groups, suggesting good cellulose crystallinity. In Figure 7b, the ranges 1400–2500 cm-1 and 2500–3000 cm−1 of the IR spectrum on blank areas of folio 285 (black line) are magnified, as the main variations a paper can show in the IR spectrum because of surface treatments, sizing, or degradation occur in this region. As a reference (in red), the IR spectrum of a pure cellulose paper is shown. The two spectra, red and black, were normalized for the 1023 peak, which generally is contributed only by cellulose. The window shows the spectra difference, obtained by subtracting the red spectrum from the black one (Figure 7b). Two bands with maxima at 1548 and 1650 cm−1 are evident, attributable to the amide I and II protein peaks. This outcome indicated a gelatin-based sizing, as typical of western paper, or a shiny coating applied using egg tempera or casein, as usual in eastern paper production.

3.2. Details in the Miniatures

As previously described, in addition to the information obtained on the structure of the paper, supporting the ATR-IR investigations (Figure 5 and Figure 6), multispectral imaging provided information about the presence of different transparencies in pigments, including greens (Figure 4). The multispectral analysis also made it possible to obtain important details on the miniatures and pentimenti presence (Figure 8b).
In particular, an interesting aspect, in addition to the transparency of apparently similar colours in the visible range (e.g., greens and blues), was created by the presence of a golden background in the yellow/green scenes (e.g., meadows, texts) or other decorated parts as clearly visible in Figure 8b and Figure 9b.
Gilded pigments were probably applied to all the miniatures for which precious details were foreseen (swords, decorations in the texts, etc.). The golden details were obtained by leaving between corresponding elements a gap that makes golden the only part of interest. In contrast, the remaining parts are covered by other coloured pigments over the background.

3.3. Artist Palette

The spectroscopic study carried out over the illuminated manuscripts MS2522-23 concerned a selection of principal pigments, dyes, and pigment mixtures present in the valuable book. Pigment identification was based on the elemental composition derived from XRF analysis and comparison with collected Raman spectra and reference samples. When the reference sample was not available, the literature reference database was adopted [34]. In addition, FORS analysis provided complementary information based on comparisons with online reference spectra databases [19].
The principal palette included the following:
-
Lead white (2PbCO3.Pb(OH)2), easily identified by strong Pb signals in the XRF spectra and by the characteristic Raman peak at 1050 cm−1 ca. It was used both as a white pigment and in mixtures with other pigments to obtain lighter hues.
-
Minium/red lead (Pb3O4) for the orange areas, unequivocally characterized by all three spectroscopies (very intense Pb signals in the XRF spectra concerning other areas; sharp inflexion points in the UV-Vis spectra at 571 nm; characteristic Raman peaks, even the weakest, at about 546, 390, 388, 340, 311, e 220 cm−1). Red lead was also employed in a mixture, or overlaid, with lead white in the reddish horse coats, as Raman analysis indicated.
-
Orpiment (As2S3), appeared as the preferred pigment employed in yellow areas. It was used alone in the light-yellow details (spectroscopic features: As signals in XRF spectra; specific inflexion points at 480nm of the reflectance spectra; strong characteristic Raman peaks at 380, 352, 308, 290, 200, 177 e 152 cm−1). It was mixed with ochres/earth in the darker tones suggested by FORS analysis because the reflectance curve presented the inflexion point at 580 nm and the typical profile of ochres. A similar mixture was presumed for the light brown hue of deer coats, although only Raman analysis was carried out here, and it highlighted the presence of orpiment. However, Raman signals of ochres, often broad and weak, were probably covered by strong orpiment signals. In dark green areas, the artist employed a mixture of orpiment and indigo identified by Raman spectra and confirmed by XRF and FORS analysis (see below in the text for further information).
-
Cinnabar/vermilion (HgS) for the bright red tones, clearly characterized by the high amounts of Hg signals in XRF spectra, the typical sigma-profile of reflectance spectrum with an inflexion point at 600 nm and the strong Raman peaks at 340, 281 e 250 cm−1. Raman analysis showed that cinnabar was employed in a mixture with red lead for darker skin tones. The same combination, lightened by lead white, was used in the intermediate skin hues.
-
Earths/ochres, complex mixtures of Fe(III) oxides, hydroxides, oxo-hydroxides, and silicates and some other transition metal compounds. Red ochres were identified in dark red areas, as indicated by the distinctive inflexion point at 580 nm and the absorbance maximum at higher wavelengths in the FORS spectra, combined with strong iron signals in the XRF spectra. As already mentioned, natural ochres/earth were found in a mixture with other pigments to give, e.g., dark yellow or light brown hues.
-
Verdigris (copper acetates), found in aqua-green areas and lapis lazuli, were extensively used in blue areas (their spectral features will be discussed more thoroughly later in the text). In dark blue regions, the presence of organic dyes in a mixture with lapis lazuli was not excluded, but there was no clear spectroscopic evidence. Lapis lazuli was lightened with lead white in light blue areas.
-
Silver (now oxidized) was employed to depict the water in the illumination with the princess at the source. The metal was identified by XRF analysis, along with alteration compounds such as chlorides.
The spectroscopic analysis carried out on pink and light purple areas only showed the presence of lead white. The artist probably employed red lake pigments for these tones, but their presence could be inferred only from the absence of elements characterizing the inorganic pigments of the corresponding colour. Organic reds cause in Raman spectra a high fluorescence background, and their constitutive elements were undetectable by XRF. XRF e Raman analysis showed nothing except lead white presence in grey areas, probably used in a mixture with carbon black. Lastly, it is essential to underline the ubiquitous Pb signals in all XRF spectra.
The summaries of the spectroscopic campaign carried out on f. 2r-2v, f. 303v, and on miniatures of Figure 3b–e are reported, respectively, in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3.
A specific section in Supplementary Materials shows a comparative XRF analysis of the red-yellow areas, supporting the evidence provided by the Raman-XRF-FORS results. XRF (see Figure S1) confirmed that dark red areas were realized using ochres, light red areas with cinnabar, and yellow ones with orpiment. In only small orange areas, we registered red lead.

3.4. Green and Blue Pigments

Multispectral analysis, as previously mentioned, evidenced the occurrence of greens and blues, appearing almost similar in the visible images but partially transparent in the IR ones, indicating the use of different pigments and mixtures for the green/blue tones (Figure 4).
Starting from this evidence, specific green points 6, 8, 17, 18, 19, 34, 44, 45, 47, 48, 49, and 50 (Figure 2 and Figure 3) were analyzed. The spectroscopic results (Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3) revealed the occurrence of three types of green tones: (1) blue-green tones in some dress or cap (pt. 6, 34); (2) yellow-green tones in the foliage (the green of leaves, bushes, etc., pt. 19, 44,45,48); and (3) dark green tones (pt. 8, 47) in some dress, fabric, or bush (pt. 8, 47, 49, 50). XRF and FORS analyses unambiguously indicated that the blue-green tone (aqua green) was realized using verdigris, a mixture of different copper acetates. The FORS curve (Figure 10a) showed a typical profile of verdigris, with a relative minimum at 725 nm and maximum at 550 nm, whereas XRF detected a strong copper signal (Figure 10b).
It was impossible to identify the pigment using micro-Raman, due to its fluorescence. This situation is familiar with verdigris, which often induces fluorescent compounds related to degradation reactions occurring in the organic binders. In Persian manuscripts, this fact has been attributed also to the presence of saffron mixed with verdigris, as preservative and dye [32]. An overlooked aspect is the frequent absence of verdigris pigment grains, preventing the detection of the pigment through Raman; this could also be related to verdigris’ propensity to dissolve in proteinaceous binders, with significant alteration of the original structure [35].
In the yellow-green or dark green areas (yellow-green for the foliage and grass, dark green for bushes), the illuminators used a mixture of orpiment and indigo, identified clearly by Raman spectroscopy (Figure 11a): peaks observed at 378, 353, 306, 290, 198, 117, 151 and 134 cm−1 are typical of orpiment, while peaks at 1581, 1574, 1307, 1248, 1222, 594 e 543 cm−1 are characteristic of indigo. XRF confirmed the presence of orpiment, displaying intense signals of As (Figure 11b). This mixture is well-known with vergaut, and its use is documented in various ancient technical handbooks in Western and Eastern areas [36]. Analysis of other Persian illuminated manuscripts often shows the presence of vergaut in the miniatures [28,30].
Only in two points did we detect a significant copper signal using XRF (pt. 17 and 18 in Table 1), but the area was too small for FORS, and Raman was unable to identify the green pigments. According to visual inspection, the green tone in these areas was darker than common verdigris.
A wide range of blue tones could be observed in the miniature; one could distinguish deep blue areas, e.g., in some dresses and the friezes in the opening and closing of the codex, together with many blue shades. A comprehensive characterization of these blue areas was carried out, and in all the examined cases, the pigment was the precious natural ultramarine, i.e., the mineral lazurite, mixed with lead white (pt. 27–29, 32, 42, 43 in Table 2 and Table 3). In the Raman spectrum at 785 nm of the blue frieze (Figure 12), the peak at 548 cm−1 is a clear indication of lazurite, but other signals were also visible, including the peak at 1284 cm−1 and peaks at 1017, 1483, 1541, and 1815 cm−1. A Raman study regarding the characterization of different ultramarine natural and artificial pigments [37] shows that these spot peaks, observed in the Raman at 785 nm of natural ultramarine pigments, can be attributed to diopside fluorescence, a mineral present within the lapis lazuli, and can therefore be used as a marker for the pigment provenance. Finally, as usual in Persian manuscripts, the text was enclosed in gilded frames. Small floral decorations, bordered with red, green, and blue lines, were painted above the gilded frames. A blue copper-based pigment was detected on the blue lines of the frame embedding the text, but it was not possible to acquire Raman or FORS spectra; we can only speculate the use of azurite.
An XRF analysis was also carried out on many green areas (Figure S2 in Supplementary Materials), comparing Cu and As signals as reference for green copper-based pigments and vergaut. The XRF results show that most of the greens in the vegetation were realized with vergaut, while the objects used copper-based pigments.

4. Discussion

4.1. Folio Characterization

XRF analysis showed an almost ubiquitous occurrence of gold signals on the examined leaves, not only on the illuminated parts but even in white areas. Microscopic examination of the folios indicated small spots of shell gold everywhere on the folios, as suggested by the multispectral imaging, indicating shell gold sprinkling on the leaves as preparation before writing and painting.
ATR-IR and multispectral imaging of the white paper indicated good manufacturing and proteinaceous coating. The limited knowledge of paper manufacture in ancient Islamic and Persian areas made the attribution of sizing/finishing solely through this non-invasive analysis uncertain. This knowledge gap recently prompted a comprehensive analysis of more than 200 samples of paper from Islamic production, employing different techniques [33]. That investigation has shown that many folios (more than half of the total) were coated with a shiny finish (“polishing”) with a proteinaceous substance, which could be casein or egg white, according to the ancient treatises. Of note, in this study, several mock-ups were prepared using Whatman paper coated with egg white, and their IR spectrum, with main peaks at 1533 and 1639 cm−1, were very similar to the spectra recorded on leaf 284. Particularly relevant also was the region between 2800 and 3000 cm−1 (Figure 7b); strong signals appeared at 2850 and 2918 cm−1, which could be attributable to a lipid component, maybe deriving from an egg yolk residue, and therefore supporting the assignment to an egg-based polishing.

4.2. Illuminated and Decorated Areas

4.2.1. Artist Palette: General Aspects and Interesting Mixes

The pigment palette identified in the decorative apparatus of MS2522-23 broadly matches the known pigments studied for this specific manuscript [22,29]. The spectroscopic cross-analysis confirmed the unicity and high value of the examined manuscript; a rich set of pigments were detected, including expensive pigments such as lapis lazuli and gold pigments, extensively employed in the decorations. Lead white for pure and bright areas, the extensive use of orpiment and cinnabar/vermilion, verdigris for light green regions, lapis lazuli for blues, minium/red lead for orange areas, organic reds for rendering pink and purple tones, silver for water elements: all in agreement with Persian painting practice.
Moreover, historical sources and analytical evidence often stress the particular fondness for mixtures shown by Persian illuminators. According to this tendency, artists mostly preferred mixing pigments rather than using them alone. Lead white was widely employed in combinations to lighten or modulate tones. Vergaut was characterized in green areas depicting vegetation. Interestingly, the intensity of the XRF signal of iron acquired in correspondence of three green areas in which spectroscopies identified vergaut was higher than average (Fe is a ubiquitous element, always recorded in traces). This evidence could suggest the possible use of green earth in the mixture. The examined skin tones provided interesting data because these hues often take second place in the palette characterization, and few data are available in the literature. In addition to that, historical sources do not give much information regarding mixing pigments in general for skin hues. Some recipes were handed down by experience, such as mixing lead white and red lead for skin tones [30]. However, the illuminators employed a mixture of lead white, vermilion, and red lead for intermediate and dark skin tones (Figure 13), a mix characterized only by Clark and Mirabaud in Persian illuminated manuscripts [26].
The ubiquitous XRF signal of lead could be due to the presence of a thin preparatory layer of white lead or the white pigment in the mix with several pigments and dyes.

4.2.2. Green and Blue Pigments

Most surprisingly, the only green pigment reported in the ancient treatise was zangar, corresponding to verdigris, for which several recipes were proposed [28]. This aspect contrasts with the experimental findings on Persian illuminated manuscripts, where malachite was found in some areas of the miniatures in many cases, combined with other primary green copper pigments such as atacamite [24,25,27]. Copper pigments are challenging to identify because they often result in degradation, which is related to fluorescent compounds hampering the detection through Raman. XRF can detect copper, but not the way it is bound. Often, FORS is the only technique to identify in a non-invasive and portable way the type of copper pigment. Unfortunately, copper pigments are also prone to chemical transformation, resulting in a variety of different copper compounds, especially the synthetic green ones such as verdigris [38]. Through XRF and FORS, we identified the verdigris present in several zones of the manuscript. Still, copper green pigments (e.g., pt. 17, 18 in Table 1) were detected in small areas through XRF; visually, the color appeared darker than verdigris, but due to the small area, it was not possible to use FORS. However, the most widespread green detected in the manuscript was vergaut, mainly used in vegetation by the illuminators, likely because this mixture allows one to obtain very natural green shades, with tones from yellow to dark green, in the foliage, a superb imitation of proper vegetation. Excluding the blue line in the frame, the only blue pigment detected was natural ultramarine, i.e., lazurite, used to paint both decorations and miniatures. Still, the blue tones could be very different in the miniatures, due to a balanced mixture with white lead, indicating the high level of skill attained by the Persian illuminators.

5. Conclusions

This study detailed the results of a thorough investigation of an ancient illuminated Persian manuscript with multispectral imaging and portable spectroscopic measurements. In general, the scientific literature has presented few technical studies on Persian manuscripts compared to European ones. For this study, a holistic approach was adopted, considering that the manuscript had to be viewed as a unicum, where the single parts are strongly related to each other. New data were provided on the artist palette, considering 50 representative points using Raman, XRF, and FORS methods. ATR-IR analysis combined with multispectral imaging of the white folios clarified the nature, size, and types of grooves in the folios and the possible presence of watermarks. Concerning the palette, green and blue areas were deeply characterized, revealing different choices in realizing the hues, with natural ultramarine applied as the only blue pigment.
In contrast, green colors were realized either as a mixture of orpiment and indigo (vergaut) or mainly with verdigris. Different amounts of orpiment and indigo to modulate the green tones in the foliage, from yellow to dark green were revealed. This mix of orpiment and indigo was mirrored in the lighter and darker areas in the IR 850 nm image. Concerning the leaves, ATR-IR investigation supported the presence of a polishing, likely egg-based, and multispectral imaging indicate the occurrence of almost transparent laid lines with no clear watermark. These latter data support the assignment to Islamic paper production.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/s21154998/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.Z. and R.D.; methodology, R.D., A.Z., C.R., M.M. and R.B.; software, R.D., C.R. and A.Z.; validation, R.D. and A.Z.; formal analysis, R.D. and A.Z.; investigation, R.D., C.R., R.B. and A.Z.; data curation, R.D., A.Z. and C.R.; writing—original draft preparation, R.D., A.Z. and C.R.; writing—review and editing, R.D.; visualization, R.D., A.Z. and C.R.; supervision, R.D.; project administration, R.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study received no external funding. It was fully supported thanks to the instruments’ availability with funding from the University of Padua (Strategic Research Infrastructure “Da.Ta.Ma.Ge.E.C.H.” andand P-DISC #02BIRD2016-UNIPD, “Nanomaterials for Conservation and Diagnostics in Cultural Heritage”).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Fondazione Giorgio Cini (Venice) for the opportunity of this study, in the framework of the agreement with the Interdepartmental Center for Research, Study and Conservation of Archaeological, Architectural and Historical-Artistic Heritage—CIBA, University of Padova. This study is a part of the activities aimed at the restoration of the illuminated Persian manuscript (1624–1625) bearing the Khamsa (Pentalogy) of Ilyâs ibn Yûsuf Nizâmî-i Ganjavî, richly decorated by the School of Shîrâz illuminators (ms. inv., 2225/23), preserved in the Library of the Nuova Manica Lunga of the Fondazione Giorgio Cini in Venice, collection “Illuminated manuscripts and cuttings”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Panayotova, S. (Ed.) The Art & Science of Illuminated Manuscripts: A Handbook; Harvey Miller Publishers: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  2. Bianco, G.; Bruno, F.; Salerno, E.; Tonazzini, A. Quality Improvement of Multispectral Images for Ancient Document Analysis. In Proceedings of the EuroMed 2010, 3rd International Conference Dedicated on Digital Heritage, Lemessos, Cyprus, 8–13 November 2010; pp. 29–34. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cucci, C.; Delaney, J.K.; Picollo, M. Reflectance Hyperspectral Imaging for Investigation of Works of Art: Old Master Paintings and Illuminated Manuscripts. Acc. Chem. Res. 2016, 49, 2070–2079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Janke, A. Multispectral Imaging of the San Lorenzo Palimpsest (Florence, Archivio Del Capitolo Di San Lorenzo, Ms. 2211). Manuscr. Cult. 2014, 7, 113. [Google Scholar]
  5. Tournie, A.; Fleischer, K.; Bukreeva, I.; Palermo, F.; Perino, M.; Cedola, A.; Andraud, C.; Ranocchia, G. Ancient Greek text concealed on the back of unrolled papyrus revealed through shortwave-infrared hyperspectral imaging. Sci. Adv. 2019, 5, eaav8936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Melis, M.; Miccoli, M.; Quarta, D. Multispectral hypercolorimetry and automatic guided pigment identification: Some masterpieces case studies. In Proceedings of the SPIE Optical Metrology 2013, Munich, Germany, 13–16 May 2013; Volume 87900, p. 87900W. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kim, S.J.; Deng, F.; Brown, M.S. Visual enhancement of old documents with hyperspectral imaging. Pattern Recognit. 2011, 44, 1461–1469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Beeby, A. Spectral imaging of medieval manuscripts. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, Budapest, Hungary, 25–28 July 2020; Volume 11576, p. 115760A. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mounier, A.; Daniel, F. Hyperspectral imaging for the study of two thirteenth-century Italian miniatures from the Marcadé collection, Treasury of the Saint-Andre Cathedral in Bordeaux, France. Stud. Conserv. 2015, 60, S200–S209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Pessanha, S.; Manso, M.; Carvalho, M. Application of spectroscopic techniques to the study of illuminated manuscripts: A survey. Spectrochim. Acta Part B At. Spectrosc. 2012, 71–72, 54–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ricciardi, P.; Legrand, S.; Bertolotti, G.; Janssens, K. Macro X-ray fluorescence (MA-XRF) scanning of illuminated manuscript fragments: Potentialities and challenges. Microchem. J. 2016, 124, 785–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ricciardi, P.; Pallipurath, A.; Rose, K. ‘It’s not easy being green’: A spectroscopic study of green pigments used in illuminated manuscripts. Anal. Methods 2013, 5, 3819–3824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Guerra, M.; Manso, M.; Pessanha, S.; Gac, A.; Longelin, S.; Guilherme, B.A.; Gil, M.; Seruya, A.; Carvalho, M. XRF spectrometry as a diagnostic tool in conservation of illuminated manuscripts. In Cultural Heritage: Protection, Developments and International Perspectives; Nova Science Publishers: Hauppauge, NY, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  14. MacLennan, D.; Llewellyn, L.; Delaney, J.K.; Dooley, K.A.; Schmidt Patterson, C.; Szafran, Y.; Trentelman, K. Visualizing and measuring gold leaf in fourteenth- and fifteenth-century Italian gold ground paintings using scanning macro X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy: A new tool for advancing art historical research. Herit. Sci. 2019, 7, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Turner, N.K.; Patterson, C.S.; MacLennan, D.K.; Trentelman, K. Visualizing underdrawings in medieval manuscript illuminations with macro-X-ray fluorescence scanning. X-ray Spectrom. 2019, 48, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wehling, B.; Vandenabeele, P.; Moens, L.; Klockenkämper, R.; Von Bohlen, A.; Van Hooydonk, G.; De Reu, M. Investigation of pigments in medieval manuscripts by micro raman spectroscopy and total reflection X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. Microchim. Acta 1999, 130, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bicchieri, M.; Nardone, M.; Sodo, A. Application of micro-Raman spectroscopy to the study of an illuminated medieval manuscript. J. Cult. Herit. 2000, 1, S277–S279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Delaney, J.K.; Ricciardi, P.; Glinsman, L.D.; Facini, M.; Thoury, M.; Palmer, M.; De La Rie, E.R. Use of imaging spectroscopy, fiber optic reflectance spectroscopy, and X-ray fluorescence to map and identify pigments in illuminated manuscripts. Stud. Conserv. 2014, 59, 91–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Aceto, M.; Agostino, A.; Fenoglio, G.; Idone, A.; Gulmini, M.; Picollo, M.; Ricciardi, P.; Delaney, J.K. Characterization of colourants on illuminated manuscripts by portable fibre optic UV-visible-NIR reflec-tance spectrophotometry. Anal. Methods 2014, 6, 1488–1500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tempesta, G.; Porfido, C.; Bellino, M.; Monno, A. The “Exultet 1” of Bari: Multi-methodological approach for the study of a rare medieval parchment roll. Period. Mineral. 2018, 87, 93–102. [Google Scholar]
  21. Nastova, I.; Grupče, O.; Minčeva-Šukarova, B.; Ozcatal, M.; Mojsoska, L. Spectroscopic analysis of pigments and inks in manuscripts: I. Byzantine and post-Byzantine manuscripts (10–18th century). Vib. Spectrosc. 2013, 68, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Purinton, N.; Waiters, M. A Study of the Materials Used by Medieval Persian Painters. J. Am. Inst. Conserv. 1991, 30, 125–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tanevska, V.; Nastova, I.; Minčeva-Šukarova, B.; Grupče, O.; Ozcatal, M.; Kavčić, M.; Jakovlevska-Spirovska, Z. Spectroscopic analysis of pigments and inks in manuscripts: II. Islamic illuminated manuscripts (16th–18th century). Vib. Spectrosc. 2014, 73, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bruni, S.; Cariati, F.; Casadio, F.; Guglielmi, V. Micro-Raman identification of the palette of a precious XVI century illuminated Persian codex. J. Cult. Herit. 2001, 2, 291–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jurado-López, A.; Demko, O.; Clark, R.J.H.; Jacobs, D. Analysis of the palette of a precious 16th century illuminated Turkish manuscript by Raman microscopy. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2004, 35, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Clark, R.J.H.; Mirabaud, S. Identification of the pigments on a sixteenth century Persian book of poetry by Raman microscopy. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2006, 37, 235–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Burgio, L.; Clark, R.J.H.; Burgio, L.; Muralha, V.S.F.; Stanley, T. Pigment analysis by Raman microscopy of the non-figurative illumination in 16th-to 18th-century Islamic manuscripts. J. Raman Spectrosc. 2008, 39, 1482–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Muralha, V.S.F.; Burgio, L.; Clark, R.J.H. Raman spectroscopy analysis of pigments on 16–17th c. Persian manuscripts. Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2012, 92, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Barkeshli, M. Paint palette used by Iranian masters based on Persian medieval recipes. Restaurator. Int. J. Preserv. Libr. Arch. Mater. 2013, 34, 101–133. [Google Scholar]
  30. Anselmi, C.; Ricciardi, P.; Buti, D.; Romani, A.; Moretti, P.; Beers, K.R.; Brunetti, B.G.; Miliani, C.; Sgamellotti, A. MOLAB® meets Persia: Non-invasive study of a sixteenth-century illuminated manuscript. Stud. Conserv. 2015, 60, S185–S192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Knipe, P.; Eremin, K.; Walton, M.; Babini, A.; Rayner, G. Materials and techniques of Islamic manuscripts. Herit. Sci. 2018, 6, 55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Barkeshli, M.; Ataie, G.H. pH Stability of Saffron Used in Verdigris as an Inhibitor in Persian Miniature Paintings. Restaurator 2002, 23, 154–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Mahgoub, H.; Bardon, T.; Lichtblau, D.; Fearn, T.; Strlič, M. Material properties of Islamic paper. Herit. Sci. 2016, 4, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Bell, I.M.; Clark, R.J.; Gibbs, P.J. Raman spectroscopic library of natural and synthetic pigments (pre- ≈ 1850 AD). Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 1997, 53, 2159–2179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zoleo, A.; Nodari, L.; Rampazzo, M.; Piccinelli, F.; Russo, U.; Federici, C.; Brustolon, M. Characterization of Pigment and Binder in Badly Conserved Illuminations of a 15th-Century Manuscript. Archaeometry 2013, 56, 496–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Herringham, C.J.P.; Cennini, C. The Book of the Art of Cennino Cennini: A Contemporary Practical Treatise on Quattrocento Painting; Andesite Press: New York, NY, USA, 2017; 332p. [Google Scholar]
  37. Schmidt, C.M.; Walton, M.S.; Trentelman, K. Characterization of Lapis Lazuli Pigments Using a Multitechnique Analytical Approach: Implications for Identification and Geological Provenancing. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 8513–8518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Buse, J.; Otero, V.; Melo, M.J. New Insights into Synthetic Copper Greens: The Search for Specific Signatures by Raman and Infrared Spectroscopy for Their Characterization in Medieval Artworks. Heritage 2019, 2, 1614–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. Some examples of different decoration types ((a): f. 1 r, (b): f. 30r, (c): f. 69r, (d): f. 37r, (e): f. 28r, (f): f. 2r, (g): f. 53 r, (h): f. 3r) in the studied illuminated Persian manuscript M2522_23 (Fondazione—Venice).
Figure 1. Some examples of different decoration types ((a): f. 1 r, (b): f. 30r, (c): f. 69r, (d): f. 37r, (e): f. 28r, (f): f. 2r, (g): f. 53 r, (h): f. 3r) in the studied illuminated Persian manuscript M2522_23 (Fondazione—Venice).
Sensors 21 04998 g001
Figure 2. Distribution of point analyses for spectroscopic measurements in folios f. 2r (enlargements (a,b)) and f. 2v (enlargement (c)) of the studied Persian manuscript 2522_23 (Fondazione—Venice).
Figure 2. Distribution of point analyses for spectroscopic measurements in folios f. 2r (enlargements (a,b)) and f. 2v (enlargement (c)) of the studied Persian manuscript 2522_23 (Fondazione—Venice).
Sensors 21 04998 g002
Figure 3. Distribution of point analyses for spectroscopic measurements in folios f. 303v (a), f. 180r (b), f. 41v (c), f. 117v, and (d) f. 155v (e) of the studied Persian manuscript 2522_23 (Fondazione Cini—Venice).
Figure 3. Distribution of point analyses for spectroscopic measurements in folios f. 303v (a), f. 180r (b), f. 41v (c), f. 117v, and (d) f. 155v (e) of the studied Persian manuscript 2522_23 (Fondazione Cini—Venice).
Sensors 21 04998 g003
Figure 4. Visible (on the left) and IR 850 nm (on the right) details of a miniature (folio f. 2r in Figure 2) showing the different transparencies of green colours and mixtures identified in 8 points.
Figure 4. Visible (on the left) and IR 850 nm (on the right) details of a miniature (folio f. 2r in Figure 2) showing the different transparencies of green colours and mixtures identified in 8 points.
Sensors 21 04998 g004
Figure 5. Visible images of the folios f. 284r (a) and f. 285v (d) and 2 different elaborations of the f. 284r (b,c) and f. 285v (e,f) in the 850 nm IR band in the white area of the folios.
Figure 5. Visible images of the folios f. 284r (a) and f. 285v (d) and 2 different elaborations of the f. 284r (b,c) and f. 285v (e,f) in the 850 nm IR band in the white area of the folios.
Sensors 21 04998 g005
Figure 6. Visible images of the folios f. 285r (a) and f. 286v (d) and two different elaborations of f. 285r (b,c) and f. 286v (e,f) in the 850 nm IR band in the white area of the folios.
Figure 6. Visible images of the folios f. 285r (a) and f. 286v (d) and two different elaborations of f. 285r (b,c) and f. 286v (e,f) in the 850 nm IR band in the white area of the folios.
Sensors 21 04998 g006
Figure 7. (a) FT-IR spectra acquired in correspondence of 3 different points of the white margin in f. 285r; (b) Comparison between IR spectrum of the white margin in f. 285r (black spectrum) and the IR spectrum acquired on a pure cellulose sheet (red spectrum). The difference between the black and the red spectra is shown in the window.
Figure 7. (a) FT-IR spectra acquired in correspondence of 3 different points of the white margin in f. 285r; (b) Comparison between IR spectrum of the white margin in f. 285r (black spectrum) and the IR spectrum acquired on a pure cellulose sheet (red spectrum). The difference between the black and the red spectra is shown in the window.
Sensors 21 04998 g007
Figure 8. Visible (a) IR (b) and UV (c) folio f. 26r details of the studied Persian manuscript M2522_23 (Fondazione Cini—Venice).
Figure 8. Visible (a) IR (b) and UV (c) folio f. 26r details of the studied Persian manuscript M2522_23 (Fondazione Cini—Venice).
Sensors 21 04998 g008
Figure 9. Visible (a) IR (b) and UV (c) folio f. 303r details of the studied Persian manuscript M2522_23 (Fondazione Cini—Venice).
Figure 9. Visible (a) IR (b) and UV (c) folio f. 303r details of the studied Persian manuscript M2522_23 (Fondazione Cini—Venice).
Sensors 21 04998 g009
Figure 10. (a) FORS spectrum of point 6 in the folios f. 2r–f. 2v, showing verdigris profile. (b) XRF spectrum acquired in the same point, showing Cu signals.
Figure 10. (a) FORS spectrum of point 6 in the folios f. 2r–f. 2v, showing verdigris profile. (b) XRF spectrum acquired in the same point, showing Cu signals.
Sensors 21 04998 g010
Figure 11. (a) Raman spectrum acquired on point 44 in folio f. 40v corresponds to a green area depicting foliage (black line). Reference spectra of orpiment (dark yellow line) and indigo (blue line) are also reported in the figure for comparison. All spectra were acquired with the same laser line (785 nm). (b) XRF spectrum of the green bush in folio f. 155v. Strong As signals could be noted. Visible S and Fe signals (and a weak K signal, too) could also be observed.
Figure 11. (a) Raman spectrum acquired on point 44 in folio f. 40v corresponds to a green area depicting foliage (black line). Reference spectra of orpiment (dark yellow line) and indigo (blue line) are also reported in the figure for comparison. All spectra were acquired with the same laser line (785 nm). (b) XRF spectrum of the green bush in folio f. 155v. Strong As signals could be noted. Visible S and Fe signals (and a weak K signal, too) could also be observed.
Sensors 21 04998 g011
Figure 12. Raman spectra acquired with 785 nm laser line in correspondence with a blue area of the frieze (P2 in folios f. 2r–f. 2v). The distinctive peak of lazurite at 548 cm−1 is highlighted, along with the starred satellite peak due to diopside.
Figure 12. Raman spectra acquired with 785 nm laser line in correspondence with a blue area of the frieze (P2 in folios f. 2r–f. 2v). The distinctive peak of lazurite at 548 cm−1 is highlighted, along with the starred satellite peak due to diopside.
Sensors 21 04998 g012
Figure 13. (a) Raman spectrum acquired on point 37 in the folio f. 303v corresponding to a dark flash tone (black line). Reference spectra of red lead (orange line), lead white (blue line), and vermilion (red line) are also reported in the figure for comparison. All spectra were acquired with the same laser line (785 nm). (b) XRF spectrum of the Sultan flesh tone (P14 in the folios f. 2r–f. 2v). Strong Pb signals and Hg signals could be observed.
Figure 13. (a) Raman spectrum acquired on point 37 in the folio f. 303v corresponding to a dark flash tone (black line). Reference spectra of red lead (orange line), lead white (blue line), and vermilion (red line) are also reported in the figure for comparison. All spectra were acquired with the same laser line (785 nm). (b) XRF spectrum of the Sultan flesh tone (P14 in the folios f. 2r–f. 2v). Strong Pb signals and Hg signals could be observed.
Sensors 21 04998 g013
Table 1. Summary of analytical results from spectroscopic methods for points of folios f. 2r–2v indicated in Figure 2. F means FORS spectroscopy, X means XRF spectroscopy, R means Raman spectroscopy with 785 nm laser line, R5 and R6 respectively represent Raman spectroscopy with 514 nm and 633 nm laser lines.
Table 1. Summary of analytical results from spectroscopic methods for points of folios f. 2r–2v indicated in Figure 2. F means FORS spectroscopy, X means XRF spectroscopy, R means Raman spectroscopy with 785 nm laser line, R5 and R6 respectively represent Raman spectroscopy with 514 nm and 633 nm laser lines.
N.DescriptionApplied SpectroscopiesPigment Assignment Based on Cross Data
1Frieze, orange flowerXMinium/red lead
2Frieze, blue areaF, X, RLapis lazuli (possibly mixed with an organic dye/lake)
3Frieze, pink flowerX, RLead white probably in mixture with red lake
4Golden areaXGold
5Red hatF, XCinnabar/vermilion
6Green robeF, XVerdigris
7Orange robeF, XMinium/red lead
8Green pantsF, X, ROrpiment and indigo in mixture; lead white in mixture or in the preparatory layer
9Dark yellow robeF, X, ROrpiment (and possibly red ochre in mixture)
10Light yellow robeF, X, ROrpiment
11Dark red robeF, XRed ochre
12Blue robeFLapis lazuli
13Green leafX, ROrpiment and indigo in mixture
14Grass, yellow areaXOrpiment
15Purple robeF, X, RN.d. (only lead white in mixture or in the preparatory layer)
16Sultan, flesh toneF, X, RMinium/red lead, cinnabar/vermilion and lead white in mixture
17Green trayXCopper-based pigment
18Flag, green areaX, R6, R5Copper-based pigment, possibly mixed with an organic dye/lake; cinnabar/vermilion in trace
19Green foliageX, ROrpiment and indigo in mixture; possibly Fe-based pigment
Table 2. Summary of analytical results from spectroscopic methods for points of folio f. 303v indicated in Figure 3a. F means FORS spectroscopy, X means XRF spectroscopy, R means Raman spectroscopy with 785 nm laser line, R5 and R6 respectively represent Raman spectroscopy with 514 nm and 633 nm laser lines.
Table 2. Summary of analytical results from spectroscopic methods for points of folio f. 303v indicated in Figure 3a. F means FORS spectroscopy, X means XRF spectroscopy, R means Raman spectroscopy with 785 nm laser line, R5 and R6 respectively represent Raman spectroscopy with 514 nm and 633 nm laser lines.
N.DescriptionApplied SpectroscopiesPigment Assignment Based on Cross Data
20Orange robeRMinium/red lead
21
22
23
Sultan red robeRRed ochres/red earths
24Sultan flesh toneRCinnabar/vermilion and lead white in mixture
25Red hatRCinnabar/vermilion
26Light yellow robeROrpiment
27
28
29
Dark blue robeRLapis lazuli
30
31
Mounts, purpleRN.d. (only lead white in mixture or in the preparatory layer)
32Blue robeRLapis lazuli and lead white in mixture
33Dark red robeR6N.d.
34Green hatRVerdigris (altered?)
35
36
Light flesh toneRLead white in mixture with an undetermined red crystalline pigment
37Dark flesh toneRCinnabar/vermilion, lead white and red lead/minium in mixture
38Light gray birdRLead white possibly mixed with carbon black
39Brown deerROrpiment and natural ochers or earths in mixture
40
41
Brown horseRMinium/red lead and lead white in mixture
Table 3. Summary of analytical results from spectroscopic methods for points indicated in Figure 3b–e, where the second column shows the specific folios. F means FORS spectroscopy, X means XRF spectroscopy, R means Raman spectroscopy with 785 nm laser line, R5 and R6 respectively represent Raman spectroscopy with 514 nm and 633 nm laser lines.
Table 3. Summary of analytical results from spectroscopic methods for points indicated in Figure 3b–e, where the second column shows the specific folios. F means FORS spectroscopy, X means XRF spectroscopy, R means Raman spectroscopy with 785 nm laser line, R5 and R6 respectively represent Raman spectroscopy with 514 nm and 633 nm laser lines.
N.IlluminationDescriptionApplied SpectroscopiesPigment Assignment Based on Cross Data
42181rBlu frameXCu-based pigment—possibly azurite
43181rLight blue wallXPb-based pigment—lead white and possibly lapis lazuli in mixture
4440vGreen foliageX, ROrpiment (and possibly indigo in mixture)
4540vGreen grassX, ROrpiment and indigo in mixture
4640vBrown soil/silver waterX, RSilver (altered)
47117vGreen tentX, RN.d. (only lead white in mixture or in the preparatory layer)
48117vGreen grassX, ROrpiment and indigo in mixture (and a Fe-based pigment like ochres/earths?)
49155vGreen bushX, ROrpiment (and a Fe-based pigment in mixture?)
50155vLight green bushX, ROrpiment
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rossi, C.; Zoleo, A.; Bertoncello, R.; Meneghetti, M.; Deiana, R. Application of Multispectral Imaging and Portable Spectroscopic Instruments to the Analysis of an Ancient Persian Illuminated Manuscript. Sensors 2021, 21, 4998. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21154998

AMA Style

Rossi C, Zoleo A, Bertoncello R, Meneghetti M, Deiana R. Application of Multispectral Imaging and Portable Spectroscopic Instruments to the Analysis of an Ancient Persian Illuminated Manuscript. Sensors. 2021; 21(15):4998. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21154998

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rossi, Cecilia, Alfonso Zoleo, Renzo Bertoncello, Moreno Meneghetti, and Rita Deiana. 2021. "Application of Multispectral Imaging and Portable Spectroscopic Instruments to the Analysis of an Ancient Persian Illuminated Manuscript" Sensors 21, no. 15: 4998. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21154998

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop