Next Article in Journal
Deep Learning Sensor Fusion for Autonomous Vehicle Perception and Localization: A Review
Next Article in Special Issue
A High-Strength Strain Sensor Based on a Reshaped Micro-Air-Cavity
Previous Article in Journal
All-Fiber Measurement of Surface Tension Using a Two-Hole Fiber
Previous Article in Special Issue
Nonlinear Hydraulic Pressure Response of an Improved Fiber Tip Interferometric High-Pressure Sensor
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Review of Coating Materials Used to Improve the Performance of Optical Fiber Sensors

1
Department of Physics, School of Science, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China
2
School of measurement and communication engineering, Harbin University of Science and Technology, Harbin 150080, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2020, 20(15), 4215; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20154215
Submission received: 27 June 2020 / Revised: 23 July 2020 / Accepted: 26 July 2020 / Published: 29 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Collection Optical Fiber Sensors)

Abstract

:
In order to improve the performance of fiber sensors and fully tap the potential of optical fiber sensors, various optical materials have been selectively coated on optical fiber sensors under the background of the rapid development of various optical materials. On the basis of retaining the original characteristics of the optical fiber sensors, the coated sensors are endowed with new characteristics, such as high sensitivity, strong structure, and specific recognition. Many materials with a large thermal optical coefficient and thermal expansion coefficients are applied to optical fibers, and the temperature sensitivities are improved several times after coating. At the same time, fiber sensors have more intelligent sensing capabilities when coated with specific recognition materials. The same/different kinds of materials combined with the same/different fiber structures can produce different measurements, which is interesting. This paper summarizes and compares the fiber sensors treated by different coating materials.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

With the wide application of optical fiber sensors in industrial production and environmental detection, the advantages of optical fiber sensors have been fully reflected. In order to meet the requirements of different applications and improve the performance of optical fiber sensors, a variety of sensors with different structures have emerged. However, the processing of the fiber structure cannot fully develop the potential of the fiber sensor. In the context of the emergence of various optical materials and the gradual perfection of optical fiber sensing theory, various optical materials are known and applied to optical fiber sensors.
For basic fiber sensors, a variety of structures based on MZI (Mach–Zehnder Interference), PCF (photonic crystal fiber), FBG (fiber Bragg grating), and F-P (Fabry–Pérot) are made. Sensors are assigned different tasks depending on the workplace and the accuracy of the test. In temperature sensing, the effective length and refractive index of the optical fiber sensor will change with temperature fluctuation. However, the coefficients of thermal expansion and thermo-optic of SiO2 are small, and the overall thermal sensitivity of the fiber sensor is relatively low. To improve the sensitivities of the sensors, many materials with a higher thermo-optical coefficient are coated on the fiber. Sensors coated with polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS), polyimide, UV-sensitive materials, or graphene were proposed to be used with various optical fiber structures. The same fiber sensor may have the ability to simultaneously measure multiple parameters. Similarly, the same optical fiber structure coated with different materials will have different response characteristics. Therefore, it is necessary to analyze the sensing principle of various sensors.
In this review, studies are summarized according to the types of utilized materials and sensing principles. In the first part of this review, we summarize the optical fiber sensors coated with PDMS and discuss them according to the optical fiber structure. At the same time, the advantages of PDMS as a coating material and its sensing function in different applications are introduced. In the second part of the review, the role of polyimide as a coating material in humidity sensing is summarized. In the third part of the review, the different applications of UV-sensitive materials in optical fiber sensing are briefly introduced. In the rest, the performance of graphene, metal ions and other coating materials in sensing is described.

2. Sensors Coated with the PDMS

In the development of PDMS, the preparation and performance testing of PDMS films are indispensable steps. Through the discussion of the fabrication method and properties of the PDMS membrane, a kind of film that can be loaded and unloaded repeatedly was prepared [1]. Due to its excellent biocompatibility and biologically relevant mechanical properties, it has the potential to be a fiber coating material. In the fabrication of integrated optical circuits and circuits [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13], PDMS is usually made into a special waveguide in an integrated system [14,15]. After a large number of experimental studies, it was found that the integrated system prepared by PDMS has the characteristics of low loss, high temperature stability, and sufficient mechanical stability, and the sensitive characteristic of temperature and humidity also began to be concerned. At the same time, many optical fiber waveguides directly made of PDMS were prepared [16,17,18]. Due to the good plasticity of PDMS, optical waveguides can easily be fabricated into a variety of different structures, such as knotted, twisted, and tapered fiber. In Table 1, the thermal expansion coefficients of common materials are shown. It can be found that the value of PDMS is bigger than others. So, PDMS has the potential to improve the temperature sensitivity of fiber sensors.

2.1. A Variety of Structures Based on Mach–Zehnder Interference

In the traditional optical fiber sensing principle based on Mach-Zehnder interference, the light in the sensor can usually be divided into core-mode light (reference-mode light) and cladding-mode light (sensing mode light) [19,20]. The energy distribution of the light field can be analyzed according to the light intensity interference formula [20,21,22,23]:
I = I 1 + I 2 + 2 I 1 I 2 cos ( Δ φ )
In the above formula, I1 and I2 are the descriptions of the core light intensity and cladding light intensity, respectively. Δ φ is the optical path difference formed when light travels through different paths, at the same time; it can be expressed in another concrete form:
Δ φ = 2 π L Δ n e f f λ
It can be seen from the above equation that the effective length L and the effective refractive index difference Δ n e f f of the sensor have an important influence on Δ φ . λ is the free space wavelength. In practice, the change of these two parameters will indirectly affect the sensing performance of the fiber. In the sensor test of parameters, such as temperature and the refractive index, L and Δ n e f f will be changed accordingly with the change of the parameters to be measured. For the effective length, when the fiber is combined with material, it is limited by both the fiber and utilized material. A comprehensive thermal expansion coefficient α e f f is used to describe the α f i b e r of the fiber itself and the α m a t e r i a l endowed by the utilized material. When the measured temperature changes Δ T , the effective length changes as follows:
Δ L = α e f f Δ T L
The description of the effective refractive index is divided into two common cases: One is that the material is coated outside the cladding of the fiber, and the other is that the material is filled inside the fiber core. In the first case, the effective refractive index of cladding will be changed, while in the second case, the effective refractive index of the core will be changed. For two different cases, ε 1 , ε 2 , and ε m a t e r i a l are defined as the thermo-optic coefficient of the core, cladding, and material, respectively. When the material is filled into the core, ε 1 e f f is used to describe the effective parameters of ε 1 and ε m a t e r i a l . In the same way, ε 2 e f f is used to describe the effective parameters of ε 2 and ε m a t e r i a l for the material coated outside the cladding [20]. Depending on the situation, the difference of the effective refractive index can be defined as:
Δ n e f f = n c o r e e f f n c l a d e f f = ( ε 1 e f f n c o r e ε 2 e f f n c l a d ) Δ T
When the excitation of the optical fiber sensors is a broadband light source, the dips of the interference spectrum will appear at the particular location, and m is a positive integer:
λ d i p = 2 Δ L Δ n e f f 2 m + 1
The spectral drift is defined under the influence of many parameters:
Δ λ = [ ( α e f f + ε 1 e f f + ε 2 e f f ) Δ T ] λ
By coating the material on the optical fiber, the variables in the formula are modified, so as to improve the sensitivity of optical fiber sensing. This is the principle used in this part of the sensor. The performance of PDMS, which has a higher negative thermal optical coefficient (−4.66 × 10−4/°C) and thermal expansion coefficient (300 × 10−6/°C), has been fully reflected in the sensor [19].
When PDMS is coated on the fiber cladding, in order to fully reflect the negative thermal optical coefficient characteristic of the PDMS, the underlying fiber structure needs to be able to excite strong evanescent waves. The core off-set fiber, tapered fiber, and bend fiber can excite a strong evanescent wave, and it is characterized by simple preparation, strong plasticity, and low cost, which are widely concerned [20,21,22,23,24]. A fiber structure composed of multi-mode fiber (MMF), thin-mode fiber (TMF), and multi-mode fiber was used to verify the improvement of temperature sensitivity of the fiber sensor by PDMS in [20]. Through several temperature experiments on the sensor before and after PDMS coating, it was found that the sensitivity of the temperature changed from 47.14 pm/°C to 75.04 pm/°C, and the sensitivity increased 1.6 times. Better temperature stability was shown through the long-term temperature test. In the literature, the fiber was suspended on a scaffolding and kept perpendicular to the ground. PDMS was added at the upper end of the sensing part with a glue head dropper. Under the action of gravity, PDMS flowed down the fiber, and PDMS was coated on the fiber. This coating process is very simple. The comparison of the original fiber, which is with just the cladding, and coated fiber is shown in Figure 1, where it can be found that the thickness of the PDMS film is relatively uniform, which fully demonstrates the simplicity of the PDMS coating process.
Various kinds of tapered fibers were made to measure different parameters. In [21], the tapered fiber was obtained by tapering the standard single-mode fiber (SMF) [21], which can be used to measure the temperature; the fiber is shown as Figure 2a. The cladding of a section of fiber is removed and the new cladding of the fiber is replaced by a thicker PDMS layer [22], as shown in Figure 2b. In [23], the bowknot-type taper was prepared by melting two single-mode fibers into balls. It is a deformation of the tapered structure, as shown in Figure 2c. In Figure 2d, a section of fiber was pulled into an s-shaped fiber taper (SFT) [24], giving it the ability to measure pressure by adding PDMS blocks throughout the tapered area.
The sensors of [21,23,24] were used to measure the temperature, and they can measure the pressure in [22,24]. Although the fiber structure and the measurement are different, PDMS plays a role in protecting the fiber, especially in the pressure test. A soft PDMS membrane is necessary for the fragile tapered structure.
It is different from the all-fiber sensor based on the Mach–Zehnder interference. The Mach–Zehnder sensors in [25,26] completed the sensor arm and the reference arm. From Figure 3a, the PDMS microfiber was the reference arm, which transmitted light steadily, and the light intensity was relatively stable. Because the micro-nano fiber made by PDMS had good flexibility, it can be stretched in a certain range. With the increase of the distance between the two fiber ends, the light intensity in the air arm decreases, resulting in the change of the interference spectrum, so as to measure the micro-displacement [25]. A sensor with a real sensor arm is shown in Figure 3b. By coating the sensor arm with PDMS, it is made more sensitive to temperature sensing [26]. Different from the structure in [26], the temperature sensing experiment was completed in [27] with only one micro-nano fiber ring, and the sensitivity increased 9 times, from 183 to 1.67 nm/°C.
In the literature described above, PDMS was coated outside the cladding of the fiber as a coating material. In [28,29,30], PDMS was filled into the fiber as a special fiber core. As you can see in Figure 4, a section of the cladding and core of the standard single-mode fiber was removed, and the damaged area of the fiber was filled with PDMS with a certain thickness [28]. PDMS acts as the cladding and core at the same time. In order to give the fiber structure greater mechanical strength, a segment of hollow core fiber (HCF) filled with PDMS can be connected within the sensor [29]. In a similar fiber optic structure, two air chambers are added to both ends of the PDMS [30]. At the same temperature change, the PDMS size has the potential to change even more, making it possible for the fiber to achieve higher sensitivity. However, this delicate manipulation is more difficult.

2.2. A Variety of Structures Based on FBG/LPFG (Long-Period Fiber Grating)

Among the many kinds of optical fiber sensor components, FBG has become the highest commercial optical fiber sensor due to its better stability and lower price. Although the stability of FBG in the sensor is far less than that of other sensors, the fact that its sensors are less sensitive cannot be ignored. Usually, methods of making FBG with special materials and coating the material outside FBG are selected to improve the sensitivity of the sensor [31,32,33,34]. The sensor principle of FBG is also discussed from two aspects, stress and temperature.
The Bragg resonance wavelength ( λ B ) will appear in the following position [32]:
λ B = 2 n e f f Λ
In the above equation, n e f f and Λ represent the effective refractive index of the core and grating pitch, respectively. Obviously, n e f f and Λ are the two main factors affecting the sensitivity. They will change according to the external environment; the related formula can be obtained [32,33,34]:
Δ λ B λ B = Δ n e f f n e f f + Δ Λ Λ
When FBG is subjected to external strain, the grating constant changes as the length of FBG becomes longer, and the refractive index of FBG changes under the elasto-optical effect. A classic description is summed up to describe this change, where P e is represented by the photoelastic constant, and ε is represented by the strain induced:
Δ λ B λ B = ( 1 P e ) ε
In the temperature test, the grating constant and refractive index of the grating are affected by the thermal expansion coefficient ( α ) and thermo-optic coefficient ( ξ ), respectively. The total effect of the temperature on the wavelength drift is as follows:
Δ λ B λ B = ( α + ξ ) Δ T
After a comprehensive treatment of temperature and strain, a comprehensive formula is summed up:
Δ λ B λ B = ( 1 P ) ε + ( α + ξ ) Δ T
Whether PDMS is coated outside FBG or filled inside FBG, it can be discussed through the four aspects in the above equation.
A kind of LPFG composed of tapered fiber and PDMS grating was made [31], as shown in Figure 5. Before processing, the tapered fiber was passed through the mold with a periodically recessed structure. The PDMS was injected into the mold, in order to ensure that PDMS had good fluidity and could fill the entire mold, and the temperature was kept at 110 °C for 10 min. After the PDMS solidified, the outer mold was removed, and one LPFG was finished. For the current high-precision processing technology, this process is very simple, and the PDMS grating produced by this method has good controllability in the micron size. In the temperature test, a temperature sensitivity of −1.328 nm/°C was shown, which is not possible for conventional LPFG.
Different from the preparation method in [31], the method of coating PDMS on the outer layer of the sensor is more acceptable. In [32,33], PDMS was selected to increase the temperature sensitivity. As expected, the temperature sensitivities of the FBG and LPFG could be effectively improved by 4.2 times [32] and 4 times [21], respectively. Comparing the principles of Figure 6a,b, the functionality of PDMS is different. The light field is distributed only in the fiber core for FBG. Therefore, when the temperature increases, the size of PDMS will become longer and the length of FBG will increase. Af and Ap represent the starting position and end position of the PDMS jacket after expansion [32], respectively. For the LPFG, there is part of the light intensity in the cladding. Under the effect of the evanescent wave, light waves will interact with the external materials. Therefore, when considering the effect of thermal expansion on the size of LPFG, the effect of PDMS on the effective refractive index of cladding should also be considered [33]. In [34], an FBG coated with PDMS was designed and manufactured to detect chemical reagents. Because of the selective tensile effects of the PDMS, in different volatile organic compound (VOC) solutions, the length of PDMS will change, which will provide power for the size change of FBG [34]. This provides a new idea for the application of PDMS.

2.3. A Variety of Structures Based on F-P

According to the characteristics of PDMS, it is usually used to change the effective sensing length and effective refractive index of P-F sensors. PDMS is generally coated at the end of sensors or filled into the cavity, because it adopts the sensing mode of endpoint measurement [35,36,37,38,39].
Five F-P sensors with a similar structure are summarized for comparison in Figure 7, and their infrastructure is a standard single mode fiber (SMF). In [35], PDMS was dropped at the end of SMF and formed a hemispherical structure when PDMS solidified; the sensor is shown as Figure 7a. After leaving the SMF, the light in the fiber core will continue to spread in PDMS and will be emitted on the basic surface of PDMS and air, and the forward-propagating light will interfere with the back-propagating light. When the temperature changes, the length and refractive index of PDMS change, and the position of the interference wavelength changes significantly, while the peak intensity does not [35]. A segment of the hollow core fiber (HCF) was fused to SMF and a layer of PDMS film was applied to the end of the HCF [36], which is shown as Figure 7b. With the same function as PDMS in [34], the sensors were used to measure VOCs.
Different from the structure of [36], PDMS was filled into the core of a hollow silica capillary (HSC) to prevent PDMS leakage, and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) was applied to the outside of the sensor for sealing [37]. In the temperature range of 35 to 45 °C, its sensitivity can be up to 1.509 nm/°C. In Figure 7c, the positions of PDMS and PMMA are clearly marked.
An air cavity was also applied to the F-P structure in [38]. Instead of using HCF directly, a hollow will be created by heating the paraffin, which is coated between the optical fiber and PDMS [38]. In Figure 7d, two layers of PDMS can be seen, where the outer PDMS acts to protect the sensor. The length of PDMS will change after adsorption of toluene vapor. In [39], a thin layer of TiO2 was coated on one port of fiber, before two SMFs were fused, and an F-P structure was introduced into the fiber. TiO2 (red section) is shown in Figure 7e. Through the analysis of the above examples, it can be found that PDMS not only plays a role in temperature sensing but is also widely used in chemical measurement.

2.4. A Variety of Structures Based on SPR (Surface Plasmon Resonance)

In the above fiber-optic sensor example, we have seen that PDMS is widely used but PDMS is not a panacea. In order to meet the needs of optical fiber sensing, we can choose other materials for replacement, and we can also combine PDMS with other materials to improve the sensing performance of PDMS [40]. Especially for fiber optic sensors based on SPR, the combination of metal materials and PDMS is very important [41,42,43,44]. PCF is used in sensors due to its inherent air hole and good sensing performance. PDMS was filled into the air holes to improve the ability to reduce the energy loss with the temperature rising [41]. The micrograph is shown in Figure 8.
In [42], in order to excite the evanescent wave required for the SPR principle, the PCF was fused in the middle of the MMF. At the same time, gold and PDMS were coated on the PCF in turn [42]. The evanescent wave generated by the SPR effect can penetrate the metal layer and interact with PDMS, where the change of the refractive index of PDMS played a major role in the sensing as the fiber length was limited by gold, which is shown as Figure 9. The temperature sensitivity was −1.551 nm/°C.
A sensor with a relatively simple MMF-SMF-MMF structure was applied to the SPR sensors [43,44]. Similar to the sensor in [42], Au was coated outside the SMF to excite SPR. What is interesting is that PDMS was only applied to half of the SMF; the description is shown as Figure 10. The sensor coated with PDMS was sensitive to temperature while, at the same time, the bare sensor was better at detecting the refractive index. The temperature and refractive index can be measured simultaneously [43]. In [44], graphene-gold-Au@Ag NPs-PDMS were coated on a sensor of the same MMF-SMF-MMF structure. In this work, the graphene-gold-Au@Ag NPs showed an ability to excite SPR as a special metal, and PDMS was used to increase the temperature sensitivity [44]. More importantly, a good ability to combine with other materials was fully demonstrated.

2.5. SPR Sensors Based on LPFG

A necessary mechanism for the SPR effect is to have a sufficiently strong evanescent wave to excite the SPW (surface plasmon wave). When the propagation constant of the light wave in the cladding matches that of the SPW, the energy of the cladding mode will be converted into the energy of SPW, so that the light energy of the corresponding band of the transmission spectrum will suddenly drop and a resonance absorption peak will appear, whose position is the SPR resonance wavelength [45,46,47]. Therefore, the fiber optic sensor needs to be configured with a special structure to stimulate a strong evanescent wave, which is described in Section 2.4. However, the special fiber structure will not only destroy the mechanical strength of the fiber but also increase the difficulty of sensor preparation. LPFG with an original characteristic of the strong evanescent wave is more suitable to be combined with the SPR principle [45,46,47,48].
According to the basic principle of LPFG, the position of the light intensity and the interference spectrum of the evanescent wave can be controlled by adjusting parameters, such as the grating period. For the LPFG sensors, there are many active modes of light within the cladding that interact with the material coated outside the cladding. Different from the plate-SPR principle, SPR is considered as a new mode outside the cladding for LPFG-SPR.
An SPR sensor based on side-polished LPFG was applied to continuous glucose monitoring in [49]; the concrete schematic diagram can be found in Figure 11a. At the same time, the similar fiber structure is shown in Figure 11b in [50]. In [49], the composite metal thin layer of chromium, gold, and graphene was used to excite the SPR; however, the metal layer was replaced by chrome and gold in [50]. The biocompatible borate polymer, PAA-ran-PAAPBA, was coated on the metal layer part of the two sensors. The purpose of using multiple layers of metal is to get a stronger SPW and the PAA-ran-PAAPBA is a carrier that can be specifically identified with glucose, while the sensors have the function to monitoring the glucose [49,50].
In [51], in the gas sensor shown in Figure 12, part of the cladding on LPFG was removed. This led to a more intense evanescent wave because the light path was reduced, and Ag and graphene were used to excite the SPR. Because the surface of graphene is loose and porous, the gas can act well on the SPP. So, the sensor has a high sensitivity of the gas. In this study, the sensitivities of LPFG, LPFG + Ag, and LPFG + Ag + graphene were compared, and the result showed that the sensitivity of LPFG + Ag + graphene was much higher than the other two cases [51].
Novel reflected SPR sensors based on LPFG were proposed in [52,53], the schematic diagram is shown in Figure 13. They were different from the two SPR sensors mentioned above, as this type of sensor not only needs to coat the cladding with metal material but also needs to ensure that the fiber cross-section is flat enough to ensure that enough light is returned to the OSA. This sensor can be used in a wide range of exploration fields due to its more flexible and compact structure [52,53]. In the experiment, there is a noticeable spectral drift of different concentrations of alcohol.

3. Sensors Coated with Polyimide, Acrylate, and Materials for Cryogenic Applications

Unlike PDMS, which is mostly used for temperature measurement, polyimide is mostly used for humidity measurement while measuring temperature. With a strong structural strength, polyimide can still exist stably in an environment of 400 °C and can be used for a long time in the temperature range of −200 to 300 °C [54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76].
The application of sensors coated with different materials is becoming more and more abundant at cryogenic temperatures. It is worth discussing the coating materials to improve cryogenic temperature sensitivity. In [54], fiber sensors coated with different coating materials, such as acrylate, tin, indium-bismuth, and lead-tin, were described in the temperature range from 4.2 to 61 K. The results showed that the fiber coated with indium-bismuth had minimal sensitivity variation compared to the others [54]. Aluminum and PMMA, which are two contrast materials, were applied on FBG to verify the temperature sensitivities in the temperature range from 80 to 300 K [56]. The temperature sensitivity of the PMMA substrate, which was 0.04 nm/K, was twice as large as that of the aluminum substrate at 100 K. In [57], the sensitivities of bare FBG, acrylate-coated FBG, and polymer-coated FBG were compared and analyzed at temperatures from −180 to 25 °C [57]. The FBG coated with polymer had the biggest value of 48 pm/°C, which was 10 times bigger than that of the bare FBG. The same type of experiment was conducted in [60], where different materials, such as Ni, Cu, Zn, and Sn, were coated on the FBGs [60]. The temperature sensitivities of them were 1.5 times, 2 times, 2.5 times, and 3 times more than that of the bare FBG, respectively [60]. Equally important, the structures of fiber sensors were not damaged under the cryogenic temperatures [54,62,63]. It is an essential advantage for fiber sensors to be applied in the field of cryogenic measurement.
When the fiber is bent, not only the loss of light intensity will increase but also the structure of the fiber will become weak. At very low temperatures (77 K), the fiber made up of SiO2 will become very fragile. This is disastrous for fiber optics applications in ultra-low temperatures [64]. In [64], polyimide was coated on the outer layer of the curved fiber to improve the frost resistance of the fiber. The stability of the optical fiber sensor in a high-temperature test was discussed by the sensor coated with polyimide, copper, aluminum, or gold [75]. By analyzing the experimental results in detail, we found that polyimide and copper had good stability. However, copper oxidizes easily at high temperatures, thus polyimide is the best option. An FBG was made by the fiber, which was made up of polyimide, to measure the temperature in the range of 30–180 °C [76].
In practical applications, there are many parameters to be measured, and the method of cascading two FBGs is used to obtain a stronger sensing capability [77]. As shown in Figure 14, a sensor consisting of two FBGs was used to measure temperature and salinity. When salinity changes, the water absorption capacity of polyimide will change, leading to a change in the length of the sensor. So, the FBG coated with polyimide was sensitive to both temperature and salinity. However, the acrylate cannot absorb water and was only sensitive to the temperature. The sensor can compensate for salinity while measuring the temperature. In [78], the polyimide was also coated on FBG for the temperature test. For FBG with the same parameters, different thicknesses of polyimide will also change the measurement results [79]. The effect of the polyimide film thickness on temperature sensing was discussed in [79]. Coated FBGs with effective diameters of 170 and 143 um were tested in a radiation hard humidity range of 0 to 100. To ensure the accuracy of the results, the experiments were completed at 20, 0, and −15 °C, respectively. It was found that the thicker sensor had a higher sensitivity.
A composite structure of FBG was produced to complete the measurement of cell growth and temperature in [80]. A complete FBG was partially etched and a polyimide silica hybrid membrane (PSHM) was coated on the etched FBG [80]. The configuration of the FBG is shown in Figure 15. Compared with the sensor of [77], the structure of [80] was compacted; however, the process was more difficult.
In [81], an FBG coated with polyimide was installed in the rhombus metal structure; the relative positions of FBG and rhombus are shown in Figure 16. The sensor was used for the strain at a high temperature, and the function of polyimide was the stability sensing performance [81], which is the same as that in [75].
When sensing, the change of the refractive index and the length of polyimide are the main factors used to enhance the sensing performance. Adding different compounds to polyimide will greatly improve its basic performance. Various pore-foaming agents, such as lithium chloride, acetone, methyl alcohol, and activated carbon, have been added into the polyimide to explore the effects on sensitivity in [82,83]. By comparing the sensitivities of different doped materials, the sensitivity of a sensor coated with polyimide-lithium chloride was nearly three times that of the other sensors [82].
In [84], a salinity sensor consisting of a PCF loop coated with polyimide was used to measure the temperature and liquid, which is shown in Figure 17. The experimental results show that the sensitivity of salinity, which was 0.742 nm/(mol/L), was 45 times than that of FBG coated with polyimide [84]. When polyimide absorbs water, the volume increase will generate pressure in the radial direction of the loop. Because the length of the loop was 20.8 cm, which was larger than the traditional sensor, the sensitivity of salinity was ideal. The FBG was only sensitive to temperature, and it can compensate for the temperature. An F-P sensor consisting of SMF, HCF, and polyimide membrane is shown in Figure 18. When the salinity is changed, the length of the air chamber will change by the shrinkage of polyimide [85]. The influence of temperature on the interference spectrum can be removed by adjusting the length of HCF, so a temperature-independent fiber salinity sensor is thus successfully produced.
An MZI sensor was proposed by welding SMF, MMF, and SMF in turn [86], and the sensor had a stable sensitivity of 0.0115 nm/°C in the range of 30–300 °C by coating polyimide on the sensor. In Figure 19, two 3-dB couplers are connected together by SMF and PIMF (polyimide microfiber) [87]. PIMF was connected at both ends of sharp tapers as an amplifier for temperature and salinity. When the length of PIMF was changed, the spectrum of interference changed accordingly. At the same time, the sensitivities of different diameters/length of PIMF were discussed, and sensitivity increased as the diameter/length increased. This suggested that a larger PIMF is more responsive to measurement.

4. Sensors Coated with UV-Sensitive Materials

Compared with other materials, the fabrication of coating UV-curable polymer on the fiber is relatively simple, because UV-curable polymer has the characteristic of curing when exposed to UV light [88,89,90,91,92,93,94]. In the absence of UV light at room temperature, UV-curable polymer can maintain the state of the liquid for a long time, which makes it possible to manipulate it on sensors. When UV-curable polymer is irradiated by UV light, the volume of it will shrink with the curing process. So, the shrinkage of cured volume was explored in [88]. A lensed fiber was proposed, which consisted of SMF, CSF (coreless silica fiber), and a hemisphere of UV-curable polymer. The description is shown in Figure 20a.
The fabrication is similar to that in [35], where the F-P sensor based on SMF was used again. The sensors of Figure 20 were tested in [90,91], where the difference is that the sensor was used to measure the temperature and refractive index in [81], while it was used to measure temperature and pressure in [91]. This fully shows the potential of UV-curable polymer in fiber sensing.
A compact M-Z sensor was developed by fusing SMF and graded index fiber (GIF) [92]. From Figure 21, it can be found that GIF has a tiny cavity filled with UV-curable polymer. When light propagates in GIF, due to the different refractive indexes of GIF and UV-curable polymer, the optical path of the two parts is different, and an interference phenomenon will occur. Through many experiments, it was found that the sensor has a good stability, which is also the embodiment of UV-curable polymer’s performance. In order to fully understand the performance of UV-curable polymer, various elements were doped in it for temperature experiments. A PCF filled with the mixture of CdSe/ZnS quantum and UV curing adhesive was demonstrated in [93].
The combination of UV-curable adhesive and SPR is indispensable in many kinds of sensors. In [94] and Figure 22, an SPR sensor was proposed based on SMF, UV-curable adhesive, and gold film. The whole sensing area was completely enclosed by UV-curable adhesive, which enhanced the sensing function while protecting the fiber structure. To ensure the accuracy of the temperature sensitivity, experiments were carried out at 25 to 100 °C and 100 to 25 °C.

5. Sensors Coated with Graphene, Metal Ions, and Others

In recent years, different kinds of graphene and metal ions have been widely studied and used in optical fiber sensors. Many sensors, although coated with different materials, are based mostly on SPR principles [95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119]. Because the effective surface area of the optical fiber is small, it is difficult to coat the material on the optical fiber. A prism coated with material was used in the SPR sensor [95,96,97]; at the same time, it is the original structure based on SPR. However, in prism experiments, the instruments are more expensive and the process more complex. Once again, the focus of the experiment goes back to the fiber.
For sensors coated with graphene, in [99], a U-shaped sensor coated with graphene/AgNPs was proposed by SPR [99]. In [100], the cladding of SMF was removed, the graphene oxide encapsulated gold nanoparticle was coated on the core, and a novel cladding was made [100]. A structure that was similar to that in [28,94] was mentioned again, except that the coated material became graphene. Without exception, such sensors are also structurally weak. To solve this problem, a section of HCF internally filled graphene quantum dots were used to strengthen the optical fiber structure [102]. The approach is also suitable for sensors that use alcohol as a sensor. The PCF filled with alcohol was proposed to avoid alcohol evaporation [103]. In [104], a microfiber made up of poly methyl methacrylate (PMMA) was connected with silica microfiber as shown in Figure 23. Under the evanescent wave, the light in the silica microfiber will be transmitted to the PMMA microfiber. When the temperature changes, the interference spectrum will vary with the length of the PMMA microfiber.
With the development of coating technology and fiber processing methods, more and more materials, such as ITO [107], TiO2 [108], gold nanoparticles [109,110,111,112,113], and ZnO [118,119], have been applied to fibers. In addition to the usual temperature and refractive index measurements, different chemicals were added to the coating material to enable the sensor to gain specific recognition. For example, the silver nanoparticles/PVP/PVA hybrid was used to measure ammonia [115].
In Table 2, the sensors mentioned above are classified according to the different coating materials and fiber structure. The serial numbers of the corresponding documents are filled in the form. According to the number of studies, we can find that PDMS materials and sensors based on MZI and FBG/LPFG are widely used.

6. Conclusions

In this review, fiber sensors based on different structures and materials were summarized and analyzed. Through the analysis of the sensing principle, it can be found that most coated materials have a large thermal expansion coefficient and thermal light coefficient. When the amount of temperature change is the same, the coated material can provide the sensor with a greater change of effective parameters, thus enabling the sensor to obtain a higher sensitivity. For the fiber sensor that needs to be coated, the performances of the material are very important, and the stability and reliability of the fiber structure are equally important. So, sensors based on FBG/LPFG are more widely used, while FBG/LPFG have better production technology and theoretical analysis. The same fiber structure with different coating materials will be given different sensing properties, and the combination of fiber and material is therefore flexible. However, it is not necessary to make the fiber structure with a fragile structure in order to better excite the material performance. In the future, more varieties of fibers coated with materials will be produced. With the development of chemical materials, materials with specific recognition functions will be applied to fiber sensors, which will bring the application of optical fiber sensing to a new milestone.

Author Contributions

Formal analysis, C.L., W.Y., M.W., Y.X. and Y.Y.; investigation, C.L., W.Y. and M.W.; writing—original draft preparation, C.L.; funding acquisition, W.Y.; writing—review and editing, C.L., W.Y., M.W., Y.X., Y.Y., X.Y., J.F. and L.L.; project administration, W.Y.; conceptualization, X.Y., J.F. and Y.X.; supervision, X.Y. and J.F.; resources, X.Y. and L.L.; visualization, Y.Y. and L.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the University Nursing Program for Young Scholars with Creative Talents in Heilongjiang Province (No. UNPYSCT-2017095), the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province (Grant NO. YQ2019A004), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11444004 and NO. 61372013).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Thangawng, A.L.; Ruoff, R.S.; Swartz, M.A.; Glucksberg, M.R. An ultra-thin PDMS membrane as a bio/micro–nano interface: Fabrication and characterization. Biomed. Microdevices 2007, 9, 587–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Zhou, J.; Ellis, A.V.; Voelcker, N.H. Recent developments in PDMS surface modification for microfluidic devices. Electrophoresis 2010, 31, 2–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Berthier, E.; Young, E.W.K.; Beebe, D. Engineers are from PDMS-land, Biologists are from Polystyrenia. Lab Chip 2012, 12, 1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, L.; Xiao, Z.; Tan, S.; Pu, L.; Zhang, Z. Composite PDMS membrane with high flux for the separation of organics from water by pervaporation. J. Membr. Sci. 2004, 243, 177–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Odom, T.W.; Thalladi, V.R.; Love, A.J.C.; Whitesides, G.M. Generation of 30−50 nm Structures Using Easily Fabricated, Composite PDMS Masks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 12112–12113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Camou, S.; Fujita, H.; Fujii, T. PDMS 2D optical lens integrated with microfluidic channels: Principle and characterization. Lab Chip 2003, 3, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wu, P.; Field, R.; England, R.; Brisdon, B. A fundamental study of organofunctionalised PDMS membranes for the pervaporative recovery of phenolic compounds from aqueous streams. J. Membr. Sci. 2001, 190, 147–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bhagat, A.A.S.; Jothimuthu, P.; Papautsky, I. Photodefinable polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) for rapid lab-on-a-chip prototyping. Lab Chip 2007, 7, 1192–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shiku, H.; Saito, T.; Wu, C.-C.; Yasukawa, T.; Yokoo, M.; Abé, H.; Matsue, T.; Yamada, H. Oxygen Permeability of Surface-modified Poly(dimethylsiloxane) Characterized by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy. Chem. Lett. 2006, 35, 234–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Chaffin, K.; Wilson, C.L.; Himes, A.K.; Dawson, J.W.; Haddad, T.D.; Buckalew, A.J.; Miller, J.P.; Untereker, D.F.; Simha, N.K. Abrasion and fatigue resistance of PDMS containing multiblock polyurethanes after accelerated water exposure at elevated temperature. Biomaterials 2013, 34, 8030–8041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Liu, H.-S.; Pan, B.-C.; Liou, G.-S. Highly transparent AgNW/PDMS stretchable electrodes for elastomeric electrochromic devices. Nanoscale 2017, 9, 2633–2639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Francioso, L.; De Pascali, C.; Bartali, R.; Morganti, E.; Lorenzelli, L.; Siciliano, P.A.; Laidani, N. PDMS/Kapton Interface Plasma Treatment Effects on the Polymeric Package for a Wearable Thermoelectric Generator. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 6586–6590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tai, Y.-L.; Yang, Z.-G. Flexible pressure sensing film based on ultra-sensitive SWCNT/PDMS spheres for monitoring human pulse signals. J. Mater. Chem. B 2015, 3, 5436–5441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Chang-Yen, D.; Eich, R.; Gale, B.K. A monolithic PDMS waveguide system fabricated using soft-lithography techniques. J. Light. Technol. 2005, 23, 2088–2093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Kopetz, S.; Cai, D.; Rabe, E.; Neyer, A. PDMS-based optical waveguide layer for integration in electrical–optical circuit boards. AEU—Int. J. Electron. Commun. 2007, 61, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Valouch, S.; Sieber, H.; Kettlitz, S.; Eschenbaum, C.; Hollenbach, U.; Lemmer, U. Direct fabrication of PDMS waveguides via low-cost DUV irradiation for optical sensing. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 28855–28861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Martincek, I.; Pudis, D.; Gaso, P. Fabrication and Optical Characterization of Strain Variable PDMS Biconical Optical Fiber Taper. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2013, 25, 2066–2069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Martincek, I.; Pudis, D.; Chalupová, M. Technology for the Preparation of PDMS Optical Fibers and Some Fiber Structures. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2014, 26, 1446–1449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sidek, O.; Bin Afzal, M.H. A review paper on fiber-optic sensors and application of PDMS materials for enhanced performance. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Symposium on Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications (ISBEIA), Langkawi, Malaysia, 25–28 September 2011; pp. 458–463. [Google Scholar]
  20. Yang, W.; Li, C.; Wang, M.; Yu, X.; Fan, J.; Xiong, Y.; Yang, Y.; Li, L. The Polydimethylsiloxane Coated Fiber Optic for All Fiber Temperature Sensing Based on the Multi-Thin-Multi Fiber Structure. IEEE Sens. J. 2020, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Romano, I.H.; Monzón-Hernández, D.; Moreno-Hernández, C.; Moreno-Hernández, D.; Villatoro, J. Highly Sensitive Temperature Sensor Based on a Polymer-Coated Microfiber Interferometer. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2015, 27, 2591–2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kacik, D.; Tatar, P.; Turek, I. Locally pressed etched optical fiber with PDMS coating for a sensor application. Optik. 2016, 127, 5631–5635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Gong, J.; Shen, C.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhang, C.; Ding, Z.; Deng, H.; Yu, J.; Hou, Y.; Fang, J.; et al. Optical fiber temperature sensor based on Mach-Zehnder interferometer coated with a film of PDMS. In Proceedings of the 2019 18th International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks (ICOCN), Huangshan, China, 5–8 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yang, R.; Yu, Y.-S.; Zhu, C.-C.; Xue, Y.; Chen, C.; Zhang, X.-Y.; Zhang, B.-L.; Sun, H.-B. PDMS-Coated S-Tapered Fiber for Highly Sensitive Measurements of Transverse Load and Temperature. IEEE Sens. J. 2015, 15, 3429–3435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Martincek, I.; Kacik, D. A PDMS microfiber Mach-Zehnder interferometer and determination of nanometer displacements. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2018, 40, 13–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Liu, Z.; Xiao, H.; Liao, M.; Han, X.; Chen, W.; Zhao, T.; Jia, H.; Yang, J.; Tian, Y. PDMS-Assisted Microfiber M-Z Interferometer with a Knot Resonator for Temperature Sensing. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2019, 31, 337–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Fan, R.; Yang, J.; Li, J.; Meng, F. Temperature measurement using a microfiber knot ring encapsulated in PDMS. Phys. Scr. 2019, 94, 125706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. He, C.; Fang, J.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, Y.; Yu, J.; Zhang, J.; Guan, H.; Qiu, W.; Wu, P.; Dong, J.; et al. High performance all-fiber temperature sensor based on coreless side-polished fiber wrapped with polydimethylsiloxane. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 9686–9699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Cai, L.; Liu, Y.; Hu, S.; Liu, Q. Optical fiber temperature sensor based on modal interference in multimode fiber lengthened by a short segment of polydimethylsiloxane. Microw. Opt. Technol. Lett. 2019, 61, 1656–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gao, H.; Hu, H.-F.; Zhao, Y.; Li, J.; Lei, M.; Zhang, Y. Highly-sensitive optical fiber temperature sensors based on PDMS/silica hybrid fiber structures. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2018, 284, 22–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Martinez-Gaytan, A.; Soto-Olmos, J.; Oropeza-Ramos, L.; Hernández-Cordero, J. Fabrication Process for PDMS Polymer/Silica Long-Period Fiber Grating Sensors. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2015, 27, 2150–2153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Park, C.-S.; Joo, K.-I.; Kang, S.-W.; Kim, H.-R. A PDMS-Coated Optical Fiber Bragg Grating Sensor for Enhancing Temperature Sensitivity. J. Opt. Soc. Korea 2011, 15, 329–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Q.; Du, C.; Zhang, J.; Lv, R.; Zhao, Y. Sensitivity-enhanced temperature sensor based on PDMS-coated long period fiber grating. Opt. Commun. 2016, 377, 89–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Joo, K.-I.; Han, Y.; Park, C.-S.; Lee, Y.W.; Kong, S.H.; Kang, S.-W.; Kim, H.-R. Optical sensing of solvents using selective tensile effects of a PDMS-coated Fiber Bragg Grating. In Proceedings of the IEEE Sensors 2010 Conference, Kona, HI, USA, 1–4 November 2010; pp. 1645–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, X.-Y.; Yu, Y.-S.; Zhu, C.-C.; Chen, C.; Yang, R.; Xue, Y.; Chen, Q.-D.; Sun, H.-B. Miniature End-Capped Fiber Sensor for Refractive Index and Temperature Measurement. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2013, 26, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ning, X.; Yang, J.; Zhao, C.L.; Chan, C.C. PDMS-coated fiber volatile organic compounds sensors. Appl. Opt. 2016, 55, 3543–3548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Kong, L.-X.; Zhang, Y.-X.; Zhang, Y.-X.; Zhang, Y.-S.; Yu, L.; Wang, S.; Geng, P.-C.; Yan, T.-Y. High-sensitivity and fast-response fiber-optic micro-thermometer based on a plano-concave Fabry-Pérot cavity filled with PDMS. Sens. Actuators A Phys. 2018, 281, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kacik, D.; Martincek, I. Toluene optical fibre sensor based on air microcavity in PDMS. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2017, 34, 70–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Romano, I.H.; Cruz-Garcia, M.A.; Moreno-Hernández, C.; Monzón-Hernández, D.; López-Figueroa, E.O.; Paredes-Gallardo, O.E.; Torres-Cisneros, M.; Villatoro, J. Optical fiber temperature sensor based on a microcavity with polymer overlay. Opt. Express 2016, 24, 5654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mukhopadhyay, R. When PDMS isn’t the best. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 3248–3253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Markos, C.; Vlachos, K.; Kakarantzas, G. Bending loss and thermo-optic effect of a hybrid PDMS/silica photonic crystal fiber. Opt. Express 2010, 18, 24344–24351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Wang, Y.; Huang, Q.; Zhu, W.; Yang, M.; Lewis, E. Novel optical fiber SPR temperature sensor based on MMF-PCF-MMF structure and gold-PDMS film. Opt. Express 2018, 26, 1910–1917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Velázquez-González, J.S.; Monzón-Hernández, D.; Moreno-Hernández, D.; Martínez-Piñón, F.; Romano, I.H. Simultaneous measurement of refractive index and temperature using a SPR-based fiber optic sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 242, 912–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Huang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, W.; Lai, T.; Peng, J.; Lyu, D.; Guo, D.; Yuan, Y.; Lewis, E.; Yang, M. Graphene–Gold–Au@Ag NPs-PDMS Films Coated Fiber Optic for Refractive Index and Temperature Sensing. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2019, 31, 1205–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Coelho, L.; Queirós, R.B.; Santos, J.L.; Martins, M.C.L.; Viegas, D.; Jorge, P.A.S. DNA-Aptamer optical biosensors based on a LPG-SPR optical fiber platform for point-of-care diagnostic. In Proceedings of the Plasmonics in Biology and Medicine XI. International Society for Optics and Photonics, San Francisco, CA, USA, 3 March 2014; Volume 8957, p. 89570K. [Google Scholar]
  46. Gu, Z.; Lan, J.; Gao, K. Characteristics of plasmon coupling mode in SPR based LPFG. Opt. Quantum Electron. 2016, 48, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Hu, H.-F.; Deng, Z.-Q.; Zhao, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, Q. Sensing Properties of Long Period Fiber Grating Coated by Silver Film. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2015, 27, 46–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Wang, W.; Wu, W.; Huang, J.; Tian, X.; Fei, X. Modeling of a long-period fiber-optic grating-assisted surface plasmon resonance refractive index sensor. In Proceedings of the Advanced Sensor Systems and Applications VII, Beijing, China, 4 November 2016. [Google Scholar]
  49. Lu, B.; Sun, Y.; Lai, X.; Pu, Z.; Yu, H.; Xu, K.; Li, D. Side-polished fiber SPR sensor with temperature self-compensation for continuous glucose monitoring. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 29th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS), Shanghai, China, 24–28 January 2016. [Google Scholar]
  50. Li, D.; Wu, P.; Zhu, R.; Yang, J.; Yu, H.; Xu, K. Implantable fiber-optic SPR sensor modified with LPFG and PAA-ran-PAAPBA for continuous glucose monitoring. In Proceedings of the IEEE Sensors 2012, Taipei, Taiwan, 28–31 October 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wei, W.; Nong, J.; Zhang, G.; Tang, L.; Jiang, X.; Chen, N.; Luo, S.; Lan, G.; Zhu, Y. Graphene-Based Long-Period Fiber Grating Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor for High-Sensitivity Gas Sensing. Sensors 2016, 17, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Zhang, G.; Wang, C.; Zhao, M.; Cao, B. Optical resonance analysis of reflected long period fiber gratings with metal film overlay. In Proceedings of the ASIA-PACIFIC Optical Communications, Hangzhou, China, 26–30 October 2008; p. 713438. [Google Scholar]
  53. Zhao, M.; Zhang, G.; Ma, D. Single-ended long period fiber grating refractive index sensor based on metal-coated surface plasma resonance. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Conference on Optical Instruments and Technology: Advanced Sensor Technologies and Applications, Beijing, China, 16–19 November 2008; p. 7157. [Google Scholar]
  54. Scurti, F.; McGarrahan, J.; Schwartz, J. Effects of metallic coatings on the thermal sensitivity of optical fiber sensors at cryogenic temperatures. Opt. Mater. Express 2017, 7, 1754–1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Marx, B.; Warstat, K.; Röhrich, A.; Hill, W. Amplitude-Based BOTDR Sensing at Cryogenic Temperatures using Polyimide Coated Fibers. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Optical Fiber Sensors, Lausanne, Switzerland, 24–28 September 2018; p. TuE24. [Google Scholar]
  56. Gupta, S.; Mizunami, T.; Yamao, T.; Shimomura, T. Fiber Bragg grating cryogenic temperature sensors. Appl. Opt. 1996, 35, 5202–5205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Sampath, U.; Kim, D.; Kim, H.; Song, M. Polymer-coated FBG sensor for simultaneous temperature and strain monitoring in composite materials under cryogenic conditions. Appl. Opt. 2018, 57, 492–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yamada, H.; Tanaka, Y.; Ogata, M.; Mizuno, K.; Nagashima, K.; Okumura, S.; Terada, Y. Measurement and improvement of characteristics using optical fiber temperature sensors at cryogenic temperatures. Phys. C Supercond. Appl. 2011, 471, 1570–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mahar, S.; Geng, J.; Schultz, J.; Minervini, J.V.; Jiang, S.; Titus, P.; Takayasu, M.; Gung, C.-Y.; Tian, W.; Chavez-Pirson, A. Real-time simultaneous temperature and strain measurements at cryogenic temperatures in an optical fiber. In Proceedings of the Optical Engineering + Applications, San Diego, CA, USA, 10–14 August 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Li, Y.; Yang, K.; Li, X. Temperature sensing characteristics of metal coated FBG during dynamic cooling process. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2018, 45, 368–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lu, X.; Soto, M.A.; Thevenaz, L. Impact of the Fiber Coating on the Temperature Response of Distributed Optical Fiber Sensors at Cryogenic Ranges. J. Light. Technol. 2017, 36, 961–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Scurti, F.; Sathyamurthy, S.; Rupich, M.; Schwartz, J. Self-monitoring ‘SMART’(RE) Ba2Cu3O7—X conductor via integrated optical fibers. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 2017, 30, 114002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Liu, Y.; Badcock, R.A.; Fang, X.; Fang, J.; Yan, X.; Zhou, W. Selecting of FBG Coatings for Quench Detection in HTS Coils. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2018, 28, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Jiang, J.; Zhong, L.; Duan, X.; Song, M.; Li, L.; Wu, Z.; Li, Z.; Huang, Z.; Jin, Z.; Yao, L.; et al. Bend Limitation of a Polyimide-Coated Optical Fiber at Cryogenic Temperature of 77 K. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 2018, 29, 8400305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Brannon, J.H.; Lankard, J.R.; Baise, A.I.; Burns, F.; Kaufman, J. Excimer laser etching of polyimide. J. Appl. Phys. 1985, 58, 2036–2043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kanno, M.; Kawakami, H.; Nagaoka, S.; Kubota, S. Biocompatibility of fluorinated polyimide. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 2002, 60, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yoshida, M.; Lal, M.; Kumar, N.D.; Prasad, P.N. TiO2 nano-particle-dispersed polyimide composite optical waveguide materials through reverse micelles. J. Mater. Sci. 1997, 32, 4047–4051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Huang, J.-C.; Zhu, Z.-K.; Ma, X.-D.; Qian, X.-F.; Yin, J. Preparation and properties of montmorillonite/organo-soluble polyimide hybrid materials prepared by a one-step approach. J. Mater. Sci. 2001, 36, 871–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, H.; Li, Y.; Wang, T.; Wang, Q. In situ synthesis and thermal, tribological properties of thermosetting polyimide/graphene oxide nanocomposites. J. Mater. Sci. 2012, 47, 1867–1874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Newaz, G.M.; Mian, A.; Sultana, T.; Mahmood, T.; Georgiev, D.; Auner, G.; Witte, R.; Herfurth, H. A comparison between glass/polyimide and titanium/polyimide microjoint performances in cerebrospinal fluid. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. Part A 2006, 79, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Lagorce, L.; Allen, M. Magnetic and mechanical properties of micromachined strontium ferrite/polyimide composites. J. Microelectromechanical Syst. 1997, 6, 307–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  72. Nicholson, L.M.; Whitley, K.S.; Gates, T.S.; Hinkley, J.A. Influence of molecular weight on the mechanical performance of a thermoplastic glassy polyimide. J. Mater. Sci. 2000, 35, 6111–6121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ramos, M. Theoretical study of metal–polyimide interfacial properties. Vacuum 2002, 64, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Al-Kandary, S.; Ali, A.A.M.; Ahmad, Z. New polyimide-silica nano-composites from the sol-gel process using organically-modified silica network structure. J. Mater. Sci. 2006, 41, 2907–2914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Laarossi, I.; Quintela, M.; López-Higuera, J.M. Comparative Experimental Study of a High-Temperature Raman-Based Distributed Optical Fiber Sensor with Different Special Fibers. Sensors 2019, 19, 574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Satori, K.; Fukuchi, K.; Kurosawa, Y.; Hongo, A.; Takeda, N. Polyimide-coated small-diameter optical fiber sensors for embedding in composite laminate structures. In Proceedings of the SPIE’S 8th Annual International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Newport Beach, CA, USA, 5–8 March 2001; Volume 4328, pp. 285–295. [Google Scholar]
  77. Men, L.; Lu, P.; Chen, Q. A multiplexed fiber Bragg grating sensor for simultaneous salinity and temperature measurement. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Wang, L.; Fang, N.; Huang, Z. Polyimide-Coated Fiber Bragg Grating Sensors for Humidity Measurements. In High Performance Polymers-Polyimides Based-from Chemistry to Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Berruti, G.; Consales, M.; Giordano, M.; Sansone, L.; Petagna, P.; Buontempo, S.; Breglio, G.; Cusano, A. Radiation hard humidity sensors for high energy physics applications using polyimide-coated fiber Bragg gratings sensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 177, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhong, N.; Liao, Q.; Zhu, X.; Zhao, M. Fiber Bragg Grating with Polyimide–Silica Hybrid Membrane for Accurately Monitoring Cell Growth and Temperature in a Photobioreactor. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 9278–9285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Gao, X.; Xia, Z. High temperature strain sensor based on a fiber Bragg grating and rhombus metal structure. Appl. Opt. 2015, 54, E109–E112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wang, W.; Sun, T.; Peng, J.; Dai, J.; Yang, M. Humidity Sensor Based on Fiber Bragg Grating Coated with Different Pore-Foaming Agent Doped Polyimides. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2017, 29, 1963–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Sun, T.; Wang, W.; Peng, J.; Qu, Y.; Dai, J.; Yang, M. Effect of Different Inorganics on Polyimide-Based Bragg Grating Humidity Sensor. IEEE Sens. J. 2019, 19, 2016–2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Wu, C.; Guan, B.-O.; Lu, C.; Tam, H.Y. Salinity sensor based on polyimide-coated photonic crystal fiber. Opt. Express 2011, 19, 20003–20008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Zhang, X.; Peng, W. Temperature-independent fiber salinity sensor based on Fabry-Perot interference. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 10353–10358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Peng, Z.; Wang, L.; Yan, H. Research on high-temperature sensing characteristics based on modular interference of single-mode multimode single-mode fiber. SPIE/COS Photonics Asia 2016, 10025, 1002519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Wang, S.; Liu, T.; Wang, X.; Liao, Y.; Wang, J.; Wen, J. Hybrid structure Mach-Zehnder interferometer based on silica and fluorinated polyimide microfibers for temperature or salinity sensing in seawater. Measurement 2019, 135, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Wang, Q.K.; Huang, B.Q.; Wei, X.F.; Shen, H.C. Study on Shrinkage of Cured Volume for UV-Curing Coatings. Appl. Mech. Mater. 2015, 731, 588–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Kim, K.-R.; Chang, S.; Oh, K. Refractive microlens on fiber using UV-curable fluorinated acrylate polymer by surface-tension. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2003, 15, 1100–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Tan, X.L.; Geng, Y.F.; Li, X.J.; Deng, Y.-L.; Yin, Z.; Gao, R. UV-Curable Polymer Microhemisphere-Based Fiber-Optic Fabry–Perot Interferometer for Simultaneous Measurement of Refractive Index and Temperature. IEEE Photonics J. 2014, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sun, B.; Wang, Y.; Qu, J.; Liao, C.; Yin, G.; He, J.; Zhou, J.; Tang, J.; Liu, S.; Li, Z.; et al. Simultaneous measurement of pressure and temperature by employing Fabry-Perot interferometer based on pendant polymer droplet. Opt. Express 2015, 23, 1906–1911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  92. Zhang, F.; Xu, X.; He, J.; Du, B.; Wang, Y. Highly sensitive temperature sensor based on a polymer-infiltrated Mach-Zehnder interferometer created in graded index fiber. Opt. Lett. 2019, 44, 2466–2469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Wang, H.; Yang, A. Temperature sensing property of hollow-core photonic bandgap fiber filled with CdSe/ZnS quantum dots in an UV curing adhesive. Opt. Fiber Technol. 2017, 38, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Liu, S.; Cao, S.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Liao, C.; Wang, Y. Temperature Sensor Based on Side-Polished Fiber SPR Device Coated with Polymer. Sensors 2019, 19, 4063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Zeng, S.; Sreekanth, K.V.; Shang, J.-Z.; Yu, T.; Chen, C.-K.; Yin, F.; Baillargeat, D.; Coquet, P.; Ho, H.-P.; Kabashin, A.V.; et al. Graphene-Gold Metasurface Architectures for Ultrasensitive Plasmonic Biosensing. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 6163–6169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Sreekanth, K.V.; Zeng, S.; Yong, K.; Yu, T. Sensitivity enhanced biosensor using graphene-based one-dimensional photonic crystal. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 182, 424–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zeng, S.; Hu, S.; Xia, J.; Anderson, T.; Dinh, X.Q.; Meng, X.-M.; Coquet, P.; Yong, K. Graphene–MoS2 hybrid nanostructures enhanced surface plasmon resonance biosensors. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 207, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Sharma, A.K.; Gupta, J. Enhancement in performance of an evanescent wave fiber optic sensor in the near-infrared region by graphene’s chemical potential. Photonics Nanostructures Fundam. Appl. 2018, 31, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Zhang, C.; Li, Z.; Jiang, S.Z.; Li, C.; Xu, S.C.; Yu, J.; Li, Z.; Wang, M.H.; Liu, A.H.; Man, B.Y. U-bent fiber optic SPR sensor based on graphene/AgNPs. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 251, 127–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Nayak, J.K.; Parhi, P.; Jha, R. Graphene oxide encapsulated gold nanoparticle based stable fibre optic sucrose sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 22, 835–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kim, J.A.; Hwang, T.; Dugasani, S.R.; Amin, R.; Kulkarni, A.; Park, S.H.; Yeom, G.Y.; Reddy, D.S. Graphene based fiber optic surface plasmon resonance for bio-chemical sensor applications. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 187, 426–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Zhao, Y.; Tong, R.-J.; Chen, M.-Q.; Xia, F. Fluorescence Temperature Sensor Based on GQDs Solution Encapsulated in Hollow Core Fiber. IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 2017, 29, 1544–1547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Qian, W.; Zhao, C.-L.; He, S.; Dong, X.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Z.; Jin, S.; Guo, J.; Wei, H. High-sensitivity temperature sensor based on an alcohol-filled photonic crystal fiber loop mirror. Opt. Lett. 2011, 36, 1548–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Irawati, N.; Harun, S.W.; Rahman, H.A.; Chong, S.S.; Hamizi, N.A.; Ahmad, H. Temperature sensing using CdSe quantum dot doped poly(methyl methacrylate) microfiber. Appl. Opt. 2017, 56, 4675–4679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Davies, E.; Viitala, R.; Salomäki, M.O.; Areva, S.; Zhang, L.; Bennion, I. Sol–gel derived coating applied to long-period gratings for enhanced refractive index sensing properties. J. Opt. Pure Appl. Opt. 2008, 11, 15501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hosoki, A.; Nishiyama, M.; Igawa, H.; Seki, A.; Choi, Y.; Watanabe, K. A surface plasmon resonance hydrogen sensor using Au/Ta2O5/Pd multi-layers on hetero-core optical fiber structures. Sens. Actuators B 2013, 185, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Ruiz-Zamarreño, C.; Hernaez, M.; Del Villar, I.; Matias, I.R.; Arregui, F. Tunable humidity sensor based on ITO-coated optical fiber. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2010, 146, 414–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Jiang, M.; Li, Q.-S.; Wang, J.-N.; Jin, Z.; Sui, Q.; Ma, Y.; Shi, J.; Zhang, F.; Jia, L.; Yao, W.-G.; et al. TiO2 nanoparticle thin film-coated optical fiber Fabry-Perot sensor. Opt. Express 2013, 21, 3083–3090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Cheng, S.-F.; Chau, L.-K. Colloidal Gold-Modified Optical Fiber for Chemical and Biochemical Sensing. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Shao, Y.; Xu, S.; Zheng, X.; Wang, Y.; Xu, W. Optical Fiber LSPR Biosensor Prepared by Gold Nanoparticle Assembly on Polyelectrolyte Multilayer. Sensors 2010, 10, 3585–3596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. García, J.; Monzón-Hernández, D.; Manriquez, J.M.; Bustos, E. One step method to attach gold nanoparticles onto the surface of an optical fiber used for refractive index sensing. Opt. Mater. 2016, 51, 208–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Cennamo, N.; D’Agostino, G.; Donà, A.; Dacarro, G.; Pallavicini, P.; Pesavento, M.; Zeni, L. Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance with Five-Branched Gold Nanostars in a Plastic Optical Fiber for Bio-Chemical Sensor Implementation. Sensors 2013, 13, 14676–14686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Tang, J.-L.; Cheng, S.-F.; Hsu, W.-T.; Chiang, T.-Y.; Chau, L.-K. Fiber-optic biochemical sensing with a colloidal gold-modified long period fiber grating. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2006, 119, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ortega-Mendoza, J.G.; Vivanco, A.P.; Quitl, C.T.; Zaca-Morán, P.; Villegas-Hernández, D.; Chavez, F. Optical Fiber Sensor Based on Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance Using Silver Nanoparticles Photodeposited on the Optical Fiber End. Sensors 2014, 14, 18701–18710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  115. Raj, D.R.; Prasanth, S.; Vineeshkumar, T.; Sudarsanakumar, C. Ammonia sensing properties of tapered plastic optical fiber coated with silver nanoparticles/PVP/PVA hybrid. Opt. Commun. 2015, 340, 86–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Hu, J.; Jiang, M.; Lin, Z. Novel technology for depositing a Pd–Ag alloy film on a tapered optical fibre for hydrogen sensing. J. Opt. Pure Appl. Opt. 2005, 7, 593–598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wen, C. Temperature and strain sensing properties of the zinc coated FBG. Optik 2016, 127, 6463–6469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Shukla, S.; Sharma, N.K.; Sajal, V. Sensitivity enhancement of a surface plasmon resonance based fiber optic sensor using ZnO thin film: A theoretical study. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2015, 206, 463–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Gupta, S.K.; Joshi, A.; Kaur, M. Development of gas sensors using ZnO nanostructures. J. Chem. Sci. 2010, 122, 57–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Microscopic images of sensors: (a) original fiber sensor. (b) PDMS-coated fiber sensor [20].
Figure 1. Microscopic images of sensors: (a) original fiber sensor. (b) PDMS-coated fiber sensor [20].
Sensors 20 04215 g001
Figure 2. The fiber sensors coated with PDMS: (a) Tapered fiber embedded in PDMS [21]; (b) Core-fiber with PDMS cladding [22]; (c) Bowknot taper fiber coated with PDMS [23]; (d) S-shaped taper fiber coated with PDMS [24].
Figure 2. The fiber sensors coated with PDMS: (a) Tapered fiber embedded in PDMS [21]; (b) Core-fiber with PDMS cladding [22]; (c) Bowknot taper fiber coated with PDMS [23]; (d) S-shaped taper fiber coated with PDMS [24].
Sensors 20 04215 g002
Figure 3. Applications of PDMS and Mach–Zehnder structure: (a) Sensor consists of the PDMS microfiber and air arm [25]; (b) Sensor consists of a bend arm and straight arm [26].
Figure 3. Applications of PDMS and Mach–Zehnder structure: (a) Sensor consists of the PDMS microfiber and air arm [25]; (b) Sensor consists of a bend arm and straight arm [26].
Sensors 20 04215 g003
Figure 4. The sensors were filled with PDMS: (a) D-shaped fiber coated with PDMS [28]; (b) Hollow core fiber filled with PDMS [29]; (c) Hollow core fiber filled with air gap-PDMS-air gap [30].
Figure 4. The sensors were filled with PDMS: (a) D-shaped fiber coated with PDMS [28]; (b) Hollow core fiber filled with PDMS [29]; (c) Hollow core fiber filled with air gap-PDMS-air gap [30].
Sensors 20 04215 g004aSensors 20 04215 g004b
Figure 5. The schematic diagram of LPFG made up of PDMS [31].
Figure 5. The schematic diagram of LPFG made up of PDMS [31].
Sensors 20 04215 g005
Figure 6. The schematic diagram of sensors: (a) FBG sensor coated with PDMS [32]; (b) LPFG with a tube filled with PDMS [33].
Figure 6. The schematic diagram of sensors: (a) FBG sensor coated with PDMS [32]; (b) LPFG with a tube filled with PDMS [33].
Sensors 20 04215 g006
Figure 7. The descriptions of different F-P sensors: (a) The F-P sensor consists of SMF and PDMS [35]; (b) F-P sensor consists of SMF, HCF, and PDMS [36]; (c) F-P consists of SMF, HCF filled with PDMS and a PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate) protective layer [37]; (d) Sensor structure consists of SMF, air cavity, and two-PDMS layers [38]; (e) Sensor consists of SMF with the TiO2 layer and PDMS [39].
Figure 7. The descriptions of different F-P sensors: (a) The F-P sensor consists of SMF and PDMS [35]; (b) F-P sensor consists of SMF, HCF, and PDMS [36]; (c) F-P consists of SMF, HCF filled with PDMS and a PMMA (polymethylmethacrylate) protective layer [37]; (d) Sensor structure consists of SMF, air cavity, and two-PDMS layers [38]; (e) Sensor consists of SMF with the TiO2 layer and PDMS [39].
Sensors 20 04215 g007
Figure 8. The schematic diagram of PCF filled with PDMS [41].
Figure 8. The schematic diagram of PCF filled with PDMS [41].
Sensors 20 04215 g008
Figure 9. The description of PCF coated with PDMS based on SPR [42].
Figure 9. The description of PCF coated with PDMS based on SPR [42].
Sensors 20 04215 g009
Figure 10. The description of the SPR sensor coated with Au and PDMS [43].
Figure 10. The description of the SPR sensor coated with Au and PDMS [43].
Sensors 20 04215 g010
Figure 11. The description of the SPR sensors: (a) The jacket of LPFG is side-polished and coated with multilayer materials [49]; (b) LPFG sensor coated with chrome, gold, and the functional material [50].
Figure 11. The description of the SPR sensors: (a) The jacket of LPFG is side-polished and coated with multilayer materials [49]; (b) LPFG sensor coated with chrome, gold, and the functional material [50].
Sensors 20 04215 g011aSensors 20 04215 g011b
Figure 12. The gas sensor based on SPR-LPFG with Ag and graphene [51].
Figure 12. The gas sensor based on SPR-LPFG with Ag and graphene [51].
Sensors 20 04215 g012
Figure 13. The structure of the reflected LPFG-SPR sensors [52,53].
Figure 13. The structure of the reflected LPFG-SPR sensors [52,53].
Sensors 20 04215 g013
Figure 14. The FBG sensor coated with polyimide and acrylate [77].
Figure 14. The FBG sensor coated with polyimide and acrylate [77].
Sensors 20 04215 g014
Figure 15. The configuration of the FBG with PSHM [80].
Figure 15. The configuration of the FBG with PSHM [80].
Sensors 20 04215 g015
Figure 16. The schematic diagram of polyimide-FBG installed in the rhombus metal structure [81].
Figure 16. The schematic diagram of polyimide-FBG installed in the rhombus metal structure [81].
Sensors 20 04215 g016
Figure 17. The sensor consists of FBG and salinity fiber [84].
Figure 17. The sensor consists of FBG and salinity fiber [84].
Sensors 20 04215 g017
Figure 18. The configuration of the F-P consists of SMF, HCF, and polyimide [85].
Figure 18. The configuration of the F-P consists of SMF, HCF, and polyimide [85].
Sensors 20 04215 g018
Figure 19. The MZI sensor based on PIMF and SMF [87].
Figure 19. The MZI sensor based on PIMF and SMF [87].
Sensors 20 04215 g019
Figure 20. The description of the structures: (a) The lensed fiber consists of SMF, CSF, and UV-curable polymer [90]; (b) Sensor consists of SMF and UV-curable polymer [91].
Figure 20. The description of the structures: (a) The lensed fiber consists of SMF, CSF, and UV-curable polymer [90]; (b) Sensor consists of SMF and UV-curable polymer [91].
Sensors 20 04215 g020
Figure 21. The MZI sensor based on GIF and UV-polymer [92].
Figure 21. The MZI sensor based on GIF and UV-polymer [92].
Sensors 20 04215 g021
Figure 22. The SPR sensor consists of UV-curable adhesive and gold film [94].
Figure 22. The SPR sensor consists of UV-curable adhesive and gold film [94].
Sensors 20 04215 g022
Figure 23. The sensor based on the PMMA microfiber [104].
Figure 23. The sensor based on the PMMA microfiber [104].
Sensors 20 04215 g023
Table 1. The thermal expansion coefficients of materials at room temperature.
Table 1. The thermal expansion coefficients of materials at room temperature.
MaterialsThermal Expansion Coefficient
(/°C)
PDMS300 × 10−6
AL23.03 × 10−6
Ti8.35 × 10−6
Au14 × 106
polyimide20 × 106–30 × 106
SiO20.55 × 10−6
Table 2. A conclusion of the sensing function and sensitivities.
Table 2. A conclusion of the sensing function and sensitivities.
MZISPRF-PFBG/PCF
LPFG
PDMS202935 41
75.04 pm/°C 42−240.425 dB/RI32
21−1.551 nm/°C385.46 pm/°C0.042 nm/°C
3101.8 pm/°C4613.73 nm/RIU36 (VOCs)33
22(Refractive Index Unit)1.17 pm/ppm255.4 pm/°C
applied pressure43(Parts Per Million)34
232323.4 nm/RIU37
0.1957 nm/°C−2.850 nm/°C1.509 nm/°C
244438 (toluene)
−29.03 nm/N 2.17 nm/°C−1.02 nm/°C1.4 nm/g.m3
251224 nm/RIU39
applied 0.13 dB/°C
displacement
26
−41.58 pm/°C
27
1.67 nm/°C
28
−0.4409 nm/°C
29
580.6 pm/°C
30
−384 pm/°C
polyimide86 8476
0.0115 nm/°C 8512.7 pm/°C
87 0.45 nm/(mol/L)1.2 pm/µε
0.09648 nm/°C (salinity)77
60.5 pm/‰ 0.0094 nm/°C
(salinity) 0.0165 nm/M
(salinity)
78
79
80
1.97 mmol/L/h
(cell growth)
81
1.814 pm/με
82
1.71 pm/%RH
(humidity)
84
0.742 nm/(mol/L)
(salinity)
UV-sensitive materials929490 93
24611.54 nm/RIU8800 nm/RIU0.19 nm/°C 0.057 nm/°C
−13.27 nm/°C−0.978 nm/°C260 dB/RIU
91
249 pm/°C
1130 pm/MPa
graphene9649 49, (glucose)
8.25 × 102/RIU51 51, (gas sensors)
97102 0.344 nm%−1
99123.7 pm/°C
100
2.449 ∆A/RIU
(sucrose)
101
alcohol 103,
6.6 nm/°C
methyl
methacrylate
104
58.5 pm/°C
Sol-gel derived Ti, SiO2 105
1067.15 nm/RIU
Au-Ta2O5-Pd/Au 50 50 (glucose)
106 (hydrogen sensor) 113
109 −17.93 nm/RIU 37.31 dB/RIU
110
111
765 nm/RIU
112
TiO210745108,45,
5.4 RH/nm(DNA aptamer)69.38 dB/RIU(DNA aptamer)
(humidity)
Ag/PVP/PVA 51 51
52 52
114
67.6 nm/RIU
115
0.9 counts/ppm
(ammonia)
Zn/ZnO 117
49.59 pm/°C

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, C.; Yang, W.; Wang, M.; Yu, X.; Fan, J.; Xiong, Y.; Yang, Y.; Li, L. A Review of Coating Materials Used to Improve the Performance of Optical Fiber Sensors. Sensors 2020, 20, 4215. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20154215

AMA Style

Li C, Yang W, Wang M, Yu X, Fan J, Xiong Y, Yang Y, Li L. A Review of Coating Materials Used to Improve the Performance of Optical Fiber Sensors. Sensors. 2020; 20(15):4215. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20154215

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Changxu, Wenlong Yang, Min Wang, Xiaoyang Yu, Jianying Fan, Yanling Xiong, Yuqiang Yang, and Linjun Li. 2020. "A Review of Coating Materials Used to Improve the Performance of Optical Fiber Sensors" Sensors 20, no. 15: 4215. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20154215

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop