Abstract
This study provides an illustrated synoptic key and comparative morphology to the 38 known larvae of dryophthorine genera representing seven subtribes in four of the five tribes: Cactophagus LeConte, Cosmopolites Chevrolat, Cyrtotrachelus Schoenherr, Diathetes Pascoe, Diocalandra Faust, Dryophthoroides Roelofs, Dryophthorus Germar, Dynamis Chevrolat, Eucalandra Faust, Eugnoristus Schoenherr, Foveolus Vaurie, Mesocordylus Lacordaire, Metamasius Horn, Metamasius (=Paramasius Kuschel), Myocalandra Faust, Nassophasis Waterhouse, Nephius Pascoe, Odoiporus Chevrolat, Phacecorynes Schoenherr, Polytus Faust, Poteriophorus Schoenherr, Rhabdoscelus Marshall, Rhinostomus Rafinesque, Rhodobaenus LeConte, Rhynchophorus Herbst, Scyphophorus Schoenherr, Sipalinus Marshall, Sitophilus Schoenherr, Sparganobasis Marshall, Sphenophorus Schoenherr, Stenommatus Wollaston, Temnoschoita Chevrolat, Trigonotarsus Guerin-Meneville, Trochorhopalus Kirsch, Tryphetus Faust, Xerodermus Lacordaire, and Yuccaborus LeConte. Only Prodioctes Pascoe was not included due to lack of specimens to examine. Seven genera are reported here for the first time. Detailed line drawings of the mouthparts of 37 genera are provided. The synoptic key is a multi-entry key, different from a traditional, single entry dichotomous key, which allows the user to identify dryophthorine larvae using any combination of characters (couplets). A total of 52 characters are included. This study provides support for the retention of Stromboscerini in the subfamily.
1. Introduction
Some of the most devastating weevil pests that have plagued human agriculture globally have been dryophthorines (e.g., granary weevil (Sitophilus granarius (Linnaeus)) and palm weevils (Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier), R. vulneratus (Panzer), and R. palmarum Linnaeus)). Dryophthorines are major pests of various important agricultural commodities such as banana (e.g., Cosmopolites sordidus (Germar), Odoiporus longicollis (Olivier), and Polytus mellerborgii (Boheman)), agave (the sisal weevil Scyphophorus acupunctatus Gyllenhal), coconut palm (Rhinostomus barbirostris (Fabricius), Rhabdoscelus obscurus (Boisduval), and R. palmarum), sugar cane (Metamasius hemipterus (Linnaeus) and Rhabdoscelus obscurus), oil and sago palm (Rhabdoscleus obscurus, Rhynchophorus palmarum and R. ferrugineus), and date palm (Rhynchophorus palmarum) among other monocotyledons.
Worldwide, Dryophthorinae include approximately 1200 species in 153 genera and five tribes (Cryptodermatini, Dryophthorini, Orthognathini, Rhynchophorini and Stromboscerini;) with most species associated with woody monocots [1,2]. Cryptodermatini include the Oriental genus Cryptoderma Ritsema; Dryophthorini include the cosmopolitan Dryophthorus Germar and Stenommatus Wollaston and the Oriental/Australasian Psilodryophthorus Wollaston. Orthognathini are subdivided into two subtribes, Rhinostomina, which include Rhinostomus Rafinesque and Yuccaborus LeConte, and Orthognathina containing Mesocordylus Lacordaire, Orthognathus Schoenherr, and Sipalinus Marshall. The two most diverse tribes are Stromboscerini with 12 genera and Rhynchophorini, which include 125 genera in six subtribes [3].
The monophyly of Dryophthorinae has been supported by a number of higher-level phylogenic studies of the Curculionoidea [4,5,6]. However, the molecular-based phylogeny presented by McKenna et al. [7], which includes a taxon sampling of nine dryophthorines, does not recover a monophyletic Stromboscerini + Dryophthorinae. The phylogeny of Dryophthorinae is currently under study based on combined analyses of molecular and morphological data. The current comparative study of the morphological features of the immature stages, here presented in the form of a synoptic key, will serve as a valuable source of data towards inferring the phylogeny of the subfamily.
In an attempt to provide flexibility and usability of diagnostic tools, and circumvent the inherent limitations of single entry keys, a synoptic key structure is here adopted to provide the user with multiple start options when attempting to identify larval dryophthorines. In addition, an updated and overarching tool to identify Dryophthorinae larvae is sorely needed given the agricultural importance of this group and the limitations of currently available diagnostic tools [8]. Presently, to attempt an identification of dryophthorine larvae, a combination of several publications must be consulted, of which Anderson’s [9] and May’s [10] work stand out. Anderson’s [9] dichotomous keys work best with a perfectly preserved, prepared, and mounted specimen, which may not always be available. These keys also do not allow for the potential use of obvious characters of the head, thorax, and abdomen as a primary way to quickly eliminate distinct taxa. All currently known larvae representing 37 dryophthorine genera, with the exception of Prodioctes Pascoe (known as the rhizome weevil in India) are included in this key and incorporates seven (eight if Paramasius is granted generic status) new ones (Table 1). Three genera, Dynamis Chevrolat, Dryophthoroides Roelofs, and Xerodermus Lacordaire, were coded based on published records [11,12,13]. Detailed line drawings of the mouthparts of 37 genera, including reproductions of Gardner’s [11,12] illustrations of Dryophthoroides and Xerodermus, are provided in alphabetical order at the end of the key (Figure 56, Figure 57, Figure 58, Figure 59, Figure 60, Figure 61, Figure 62, Figure 63, Figure 64, Figure 65, Figure 66, Figure 67, Figure 68, Figure 69, Figure 70, Figure 71, Figure 72, Figure 73, Figure 74, Figure 75, Figure 76, Figure 77, Figure 78, Figure 79, Figure 80, Figure 81, Figure 82, Figure 83, Figure 84, Figure 85, Figure 86, Figure 87, Figure 88, Figure 89, Figure 90, Figure 91 and Figure 92).
Table 1.
Genera of known dryophthorinae larvae arranged based on current classification, biogeographic range, and depository (Australian National Insect Collection, ANIC; British Museum of Natural History, BMNH; Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas de Amazonias, INPA; Museu Zoologico de Sao Paulo, MZSP; National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, NTNU; United States National Museum, USNM). Paramasius Kuschel is here included as a separate genus from Metamasius Horn; however, this was done in an attempt to uncover potential characters that may distinguish this once valid genus from Metamasius. This table references the figure plates of each genus.
Figure 56.
Cactophagus validus mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus and labrum; (c) detail of hypopharynx, mala, and maxillary palp, dorsal view; (d) detail of mala and maxillary palp, ventral view; and (e) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 57.
Cosmopolites sordidus mouthparts: (a), epipharynx; (b) clypeus and labrum; (c) detail of mala and maxillary palp, dorsal view; (d) detail of mala and maxillary palp, ventral view; (e) detail of mala and maxillary palp, opposite side, ventral view; (f) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view; and (g) mandible and detail of cusps.
Figure 58.
Cyrtotrachelus thompsoni mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus and labrum; (c) detail of hypopharynx, mala, and maxillary palp, dorsal view; (d) antenna, anterior view; (e) antenna, oblique lateral view; (f) detail of mala, ventral view; (g) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view; and (h) mandible.
Figure 59.
Diathetes morio mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus (incomplete) and labrum; (c) detail of hypopharynx, mala, and maxillary palp, dorsal view; (d) mandible; and (e) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 60.
Diocalandra frumenti mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus and labrum; (c) detail of hypopharynx, mala, and maxillary palp, dorsal view; (d) mandible; and (e) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 61.
Reproduction of Gardner’s ([12], p. 260) Plate V: “Larvae of Curculionidae. Figure 58. Himatinum lalli, ventral mouthparts. Figures 59 and 60. Phloeophagosoma aesculi. 59. Epipharynx. 60. Ventral mouthparts. Figures 61 and 62. Macrorhyncholus ventilaginis. 61. Mandible. 62. Spiracle. Figures 63 and 64. Trochorrhopalus [sic] balwanti. 63. Larva. 64. Caudal extremity, dorsal view. Figures 65–71. Anius [Nephius] pauperatus. 65. Maxillary mala and palp. 66. Caudal extremity, dorsal view. 67. Caudal extremity, ventral view. 68. Labium. 69. Larva. 70. Epipharynx. 71. Spiracle. Figures 72 and 73. Dryophthoroides parvungulis. 72. Epipharynx. 73. Maxillary mala and palp.”
Figure 62.
Dryophthorus americanus mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus and labrum; (c) detail of hypopharynx, mala, and maxillary palp, dorsal view; and (d) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 63.
Eucalandra setulosa mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) mala and hypopharynx, dorsal view; (c) antenna, lateral view; (d) detail of mala and maxillary palp, ventral view; (e) mandible; and (f) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 64.
Eugnoristus braueri mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus (incomplete) and labrum; (c) hypopharynx, mala, and maxillary palp, dorsal view; (d) antenna, oblique-lateral view; (e) antenna, antero-lateral view; and (f) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 65.
Foveolus c.f. maculatus mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus (incomplete) labrum; (c) hypopharynx, mala, and maxillary palp, dorsal view; (d detail of mala and dorsal malar setae; (e) detail of mala and ventral malar setae; and (f) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 66.
Probably Mesocordylus sp. mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus (incomplete) and labrum; (c) detail of hypopharynx, mala and maxillary palp, dorsal view; (d) mandible; (e) detail of mala and ventral malar setae; and (f) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 67.
Metamasius ritchiei mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus (incomplete) and labrum; (c) maxillae and hypopharynx, dorsal view; (d) Metamasius hemipterus clypeus (incomplete) and labrum; (e) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view; and (f) thoracic spiracle.
Figure 68.
Myocalandra sp. Mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus and labrum; (c) maxillae and hypopharynx, dorsal view; (d) spiracles; (e) mandibles; and (f) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 69.
Nassophasis sp. Mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus and labrum; (c) maxillae and hypopharynx, dorsal view; (d) spiracles; (e) mandibles; and (f) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 70.
Nephius (=Anius) pauperatus mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) antenna, lateral view; (c) maxillae and hypopharynx, dorsal view; (d) mandible; (e) spiracles; and (f) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view. Th (L): thorax, left side; Th (R): thorax, right side; VII: 7th abdominal segment; VIII: 8th abdominal segment.
Figure 71.
Odoiporus longicollis mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus (incomplete) and labrum; (c) detail of hypopharynx, mala, and maxillary palp, dorsal view; (d) detail of mala and dorsal malar setae; (e) mandible; (f) detail of mala and ventral malar setae; and (g) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 72.
Paramasius cristulatus mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) labrum; (c) maxillae and hypopharynx, dorsal view; (d) mala, ventral view; (e) mandible, internally with scerotized process; and (f) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 73.
Phacecorynes zamiae mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus and labrum; (c) maxillae and hypopharynx, dorsal view; (d) mandible; and (e) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 74.
Polytus mellerborgii mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus and labrum; (c) maxillae and hypopharynx, dorsal view; (d) mandibles; and (e) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 75.
Poteriophorus uhlemanni mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) labium; (c) detail of maxilla and hypopharynx, dorsal view; and (d) labrum. Als: anterolateral setael; ams: anteromedian setae; dms: dorsal malar setae; lgs: ligular setae; lms: labral setae; mes: median epipharyngeal setae; pasps: posterior accessory sensory pores; pms: postmental setae; prms: premental setae; snp: sensory pores of epipharynx.
Figure 76.
Rhabdoscelus prob. obscurus mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus (incomplete) and labrum; (c) maxillae and hypopharynx, dorsal view; (d) detail of mala and dorsal malar setae; (e) detail of mala and ventral malar setae; and (f) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 77.
Rhinostomus barbirostris mouthparts: (a) clypeus (without setae) and labrum; and (b) epipharynx.
Figure 78.
Rhodobaenus tredecempunctatus mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus and labrum; (c) mala, maxillary palp, and hypopharynx, ventral view; (d) mandible; (e) detail, mala, ventral view; (f) detail, mala, dorsal view; and (g) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 79.
Rhynchophorus palmarum mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus and labrum; (c) mala and maxillary palp, dorsal view; (d) detail, mala and hypopharynx, ventral view; (e) maxillae, hypopharynx, labium, dorsal view; and (f) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 80.
Scyphophorus acupunctatus mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus and labrum; (c) mala, maxillary palp, and hypopharynx, dorsal view; (d) detail of mala and ventral malar setae; and (e) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 81.
Sipalinus gigas mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus (incomplete) and labrum; (c) detail, mala and maxillary palp, dorsal view; (d) mala and maxillary palp, ventral view; (e) labio-maxillary complex, dorsal view; and (g) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view (lms2: labial setae 2 broken).
Figure 82.
Sitophilus spp. mouthparts: (a) Sitophilus granarius epipharynx; (b) Sitophilus linearis, labrum, clypeus, mandible, antenna and anterior margin of frons; (c) Sitophilus linearis, epipharynx; (d) Sitophilus oryzae, epipharynx; (e) Sitophilus oryzae, labrum, clypeus, and anterior margin of frons; (f) Sitophilus linearis, labio-maxillary complex, ventral view; and (g) Sitophilus granarius detail, mala and labium, ventral view.
Figure 83.
Sparganobasis subcruciata mouthparts: (a) epipharynx, setae broken/weathered; (b) clypeus and labrum, setae broken/weathered; (c) mala and hypopharynx, dorsal view; (d) mandible; (e) detail, mala and dorsal malar setae, some setae broken/weathered; and (f) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view, some setae broken/weathered.
Figure 84.
Sphenophorus spp. mouthparts: (a) Sphenophorus discolor, epipharynx; (b) Sphenophorus discolor; clypeus and labrum; (c) Sphenophorus aequalis, epipharynx; (d) Sphenophorus aequalis, clypeus and labrum; (e) Sphenophorus maidis, epipharynx; and (f) Sphenophorus maidis, clypeus (incomplete) and labrum.
Figure 85.
Sphenophorus spp. mouthparts and spiracles: (a) Sphenophorus pontederiae, epipharynx; (b) Sphenophorus pontederiae, spiracles; (c) Sphenophorus maidis spiracles; (d) Sphenophorus maidis, maxillae and hypopharynx, dorsal view; (e) Sphenophorus maidis, maxillae and hypopharynx, dorsal view; (f) Sphenophorus maidis, detail, mala and labium, ventral view; (g) Sphenophorus maidis, antenna; (h) Sphenophorus maidis, mandible; and (i) Sphenophorus maidis, labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 86.
Stenommatus musae mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) epipharynx, variation; (c) clypeus and labrum; (d) antennae; (e) mala, hypopharynx, maxillary palp, dorsal view; (f) mandible; (g) mandible; and (h) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 87.
Temnoschoita sp. Mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus and labrum; (c) detail of hypopharynx and maxillae, dorsal view; (d) mandible; and (e) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 88.
Trigonotarsus calandroides mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus (incomplete) and labrum; (c) hypopharynx, and maxillary palp, dorsal view; (d) detail of mala and ventral malar setae; and (e) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 89.
Trochorhopalus strangulatus mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus and labrum; (c) detail of hypopharynx, mala, and maxillary palp, dorsal view; (d) mandible; and (e) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view.
Figure 90.
Tryphetus incarnatus mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) labrum and clypeus; (c) detail of hypopharynx, mala, and maxillary palp, dorsal view; (d) mandible; (e) spiracles; (f) detail, mala, hypopharynx, maxillary palp, dorsal view; and (g) labio-maxillary complex, ventral view. Th: thorax; III: 3rd abdominal segment; VIII: 8th abdominal segment.
Figure 91.
Reproduction of Gardner ([11], 48) Plate VI: “Larvae of Curculionidae. Figures 93–96. Sipalus [Sipalinus] hypocrita Boh. 93. Maxillary mala, dorsal view. 94. Epipharynx. 95. Abdominal spricale. 96. Posterior extremity, dorsal view. Figures 97 and 98. Cyrtotrachelus longipes F. 97. Lateral view. 1 (1 In Figure 97 the numerals IX and X should have been interchanged). 98. Mandible. Figure 99. Calandra [Sitophilus] rugicollis Casey. Figure 100. Rhynchophorus ferrugienus Ol., posterior extremity in dorsal view. Figures 101 and 102. Odoiporus longicollis Ol. 101. Posterior extremity in dorsal view. 102. Mandible. Figures 103–105. Xerodermus himalayanus Mshl. 103. Labium. 104. Posterior extremity in dorsal view. 105. Spiracle. Figures 106–110. Cossonus binodosus Mshl. 106. Ventral mouthparts. 107. Abdominal spiracle. 108. Lateral view. 109. Epipharynx. 110. Mandible. Figure 111. Brachydemnus himalayensis Stebb., an abdominal spiracle.”
Figure 92.
Yuccaborus lentiginosus mouthparts: (a) epipharynx; (b) clypeus (incomplete) and labrum; (c) detail of hypopharynx and maxillae, dorsal view; (d) mandible and antenna; and (e) labium, ventral view.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Specimens
Specimens included in this study are deposited in the following institutions, as indicated in Table 1 and Table 2:
Table 2.
Material examined including locality data and depository.
Australian National Insect Collection, ANIC;
British Museum of Natural History, BMNH;
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas de Amazonias, INPA;
Museu Zoologico de São Paulo, MZSP;
National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, NTNU; and
United States National Museum, USNM.
2.2. Slides/Associations
Associations and identifications were made by competent authorities (listed in Table 2 of the material examined) based on larva-pupa-adult associations, collected from known host plant, and/or through rearing (Figure 93 and Figure 94). Therefore, ambiguity or uncertainty are indicated with a pound symbol (#) next to the taxon name or remains uncategorized and is listed at the bottom of the character (couplet). Taxon names with an asterisk (*) indicate polymorphism. When multiple species of a genus were available for study, these were examined and in the case of Sitophilus and Sphenophorus, also illustrated and coded. The identity of Mesocordylus is based on identification of the pupa and therefore it is considered tentative in this study. However, the larva is identified as belonging in the subtribe Orthognathina. Paramasius is here included as a separate genus from Metamasius; however, this was done in an attempt to uncover potential characters that may confirm synonymy or possibly resurrection from Metamasius.
Figure 93.
Phacecorynes variegatus: (a) adult; (b) variable form, adult; (c) larva, lateral view; (d) larva, lateral view partially concealled; (e) pupa, ventral view; Phacecorynes sommeri: (f) adult; (g) larva, lateral view; and (h) pupa, lateral view. Photographs courtesy of Rolf Oberprieler.
Figure 94.
Sipalinus gigas.: (a) adult; (b) external damage; (c) larva, caudal view; (d) larva, lateral view; Trigonotarsus calandroides (e) adult, lateral view;: (f) larva, lateral view; (g) larva undergoing peristaltic behavior, lateral view; and (h) pupa, ventral view. Photographs courtesy of Rolf Oberprieler.
All of Cotton’s and Anderson’s slides housed at the USNM were examined. In the interest of time, not all were given a unique identifier or included in Table 2. Incomplete taxa for which specimens were not available for examination are Dynamis, Dryophthoroides, Rhinostomus, and Xerodermus. Their inclusion in the key largely reflects literature sources and and therefore were not included in all couplets. Prodioctes is not included and information on the larva of this taxon remains elusive. The only specimen available for study of Rhinostomus was of a prepared slide containing only the labrum/epipharynx; consequently the head, remained of the mouthparts, thorax, and abdomen were not examined. Finally, variation across instars or populations was not significantly studied.
2.3. Slide Preparation
Slide preparation of the mouthparts follows Chamorro et al. [14] with the additional step of clearing the mouthparts with 10% KOH prior to placing them on the mounting medium (PVA #6371A, Bioquip Products). The reader should consult May [10,15] for a detailed description of slide preparation procedures. Her work is a fundamental resource for the study of the immature stages of weevils.
2.4. Drawings and Imaging
Pencil drawings were rendered by the author with the aid of a drawing tube mounted on a Zeiss Axiophot compound microscope, for the mouthparts, and a Zeiss Discovery v8 stereomicroscope for the head, thorax, and abdomen of large specimens. The pencil drawings were scanned and imported as templates into Adobe Illustrator (Adobe Systems) to render digital vector graphics. Plates were arranged and labeled with Adobe Illustrator and Adobe InDesign (for color photographs).
Images were taken with an Olympus PEN5 camera mounted on a Zeiss Discovery v8 stereomicroscope. Individual images were taken at different focal planes and combined to create a single image with Zerene Stacker (Zerene Systems, LLC, Richland, WA, USA).
2.5. Terminology
Terminology follows Oberprieler et al. [16] and Chamorro et al. [17] (Figure 74). Initially, character and character state management and coding were facilitated with the use of the program vSysLab: a virtual Systematics Laboratory [18] and LUCID (lucidcentral.org).
2.6. Key: Structure and User Instructions
The synoptic key follows Holloway [19] and this publication should be consulted for relevant references and for a detailed description and example on how to use a synoptic key. Briefly, a synoptic key can best be described as a static (paper) LUCID key, which allows the user to identify a specimen using any combination of characters (couplets). A synoptic key is multi-entry, in contrast to a traditional, single entry dichotomous key. A LUCID key will be generated as a follow-up to this study.
This study focuses largely on the mouthparts, however some characters of the head, chaetotaxy, and overall body characters, such as thoracic and abdominal spiracles and shape of posterior segments (VIII and IX), are also included. The user is encouraged to first eliminate taxa by referencing the included characters of the head, general body form, spiracles, caudal processes, and, following dissection of the mouthparts, the chaetotaxy of the labrum such as als and ams of the epipharynx (indicated in grey). The key is arranged into the following nine categories, each containing a variable number of couplets (characters): habitus (3 couplets), head (3), thorax (1), abdomen (4), labrum/epipharynx (20), mandibles (4), hypopharynx (2), maxillae (10), and labium (5). The taxon chosen to illustrate a given character is underlined for each couplet. The taxon or taxa chosen to illustrate a given character state (lead) is underlined. Taxa not included in a given couplet are listed at the end of each couplet. Information on possible host commodity/host plant is included in Table 2 for most specimens as part of the material examined and this information, as well as generalized distribution data included in Table 2, may prove helpful in the identification process. Finally, as suggested by Marshall [20] (p. 395): “If the key below is used to identify specimens involved in published research (print or online), please cite this work and include the full citation in the list of references.”
To begin, select any character (couplet) (but preferably ones indicated in grey, which tend to be diagnostic at higher levels or do not require dissections of the mouthparts) and identify the character state (lead) that best describes the feature observed on the specimen. Each state is illustrated to avoid uncertainty. List the taxa under the selected character state (lead). To narrow down the list, choose a subsequent character (couplet), determine which state (lead) best describes your specimen and delete the name(s) that do not appear on the list under that state (lead). Continue this elimination process until a single taxon name remains.
3. Results
The following diagnostic characters were listed by May [15] (p. 663) to distinguish Dryophthorinae larvae. Characters 1, 2, 11, and 12 are among the most salient features.
“Larva, 1. Body shape typically expanded between Abd IV and Abd V, narrowing abruptly (seed inhabiting forms such as Sitophilus Schoenherr are subspherical). 2. Abd VIII/IX together forming a depressed dorsal disk. 3. Dorso- and ventropleural abdominal areas subdivided into 2, 3, or 4 superimposed lobes. 4. Anus subterminal or ventral. 5. Head usually free, longer than wide, entire behind; postoccipital condyles obsolete. 6. Labrum rounded, rarely distinctly trilobate. 7. Tormae well developed, subparallel, or convergent, often joined by a basal bridge. 8. Maxilla with dorsal malal setae usually branched; some setae of other mouthparts may also be branched. 9. Hypopharynx often densely pubescent. 10. Hyphopharyngeal bracon clear (Sitophilus granarius and S. zeamais are exceptions). 11. Spiracles ovate-fringed with an outer skin fold narrowly pigmented, or subtriangular with unpigmented skin fold; aligned vertically with airtubes dorsal. 12. Spiracles of Abd VIII positioned on dorsal disk, caudad.”
Known larvae of some Molytinae (Anderson’s [9] Cholini and most Hylobiini) resemble dryophhtorine larvae in that they possess almost identical abdominal spiracles [9]. Anderson [9] stressed the importance of the orientation of abdominal spiracles on segment VIII as the key feature distinguishing dryophthorines from these groups. In Dryophthorinae, the spiracular airtubes of segment VIII are directed caudad and not dorsad. The larvae of at least three molytine genera, Sternechus Schoenherr, Anchonus Schoenherr, and Heilipus Germar, possess abdominal spiracles with airtubes directed nearly posterad [9].
The following key presents illustrated characters (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14, Figure 15, Figure 16, Figure 17, Figure 18, Figure 19, Figure 20, Figure 21, Figure 22, Figure 23, Figure 24, Figure 25, Figure 26, Figure 27, Figure 28, Figure 29, Figure 30, Figure 31, Figure 32, Figure 33, Figure 34, Figure 35, Figure 36, Figure 37, Figure 38, Figure 39, Figure 40, Figure 41, Figure 42, Figure 43, Figure 44, Figure 45, Figure 46, Figure 47, Figure 48, Figure 49, Figure 50, Figure 51, Figure 52, Figure 53, Figure 54 and Figure 55) useful to distinguish known dryophthorine larvae. In addition, detailed illustrations of the mouthparts of the following 36 genera are provided at the end of the key (Figure 56, Figure 57, Figure 58, Figure 59, Figure 60, Figure 61, Figure 62, Figure 63, Figure 64, Figure 65, Figure 66, Figure 67, Figure 68, Figure 69, Figure 70, Figure 71, Figure 72, Figure 73, Figure 74, Figure 75, Figure 76, Figure 77, Figure 78, Figure 79, Figure 80, Figure 81, Figure 82, Figure 83, Figure 84, Figure 85, Figure 86, Figure 87, Figure 88, Figure 89, Figure 90, Figure 91 and Figure 92): Cactophagus LeConte (Figure 56), Cosmopolites Chevrolat (Figure 57), Cyrtotrachelus Schoenherr (Figure 58), Diathetes Pascoe (Figure 59), Diocalandra Faust (Figure 60), Dryophthoroides Roelofs (Figure 61), Dryophthorus Germar (Figure 62), Eucalandra Faust (Figure 63), Eugnoristus Schoenherr (Figure 64), Foveolus Vaurie (Figure 65), Mesocordylus Lacordaire (Figure 66), Metamasius Horn (Figure 67), Myocalandra Faust (Figure 68), Nassophasis Waterhouse (Figure 69), Nephius Pascoe (Figure 70), Odoiporus Chevrolat (Figure 71), Paramasius Kuschel (currently a junio synonym of Metamasius) (Figure 72), Phacecorynes Schoenherr (Figure 73), Polytus Faust (Figure 74), Poteriophorus Schoenherr (Figure 75), Rhabdoscelus Marshall (Figure 76), Rhinostomus Rafinesque (Figure 77, only labrum/epipharynx), Rhodobaenus LeConte (Figure 78), Rhynchophorus Herbst (Figure 79), Scyphophorus Schoenherr (Figure 80), Sipalinus Marshall (Figure 81), Sitophilus Schoenherr (Figure 82), Sparganobasis Marshall (Figure 83), Sphenophorus Schoenherr (Figure 84 and Figure 85), Stenommatus Wollaston (Figure 86), Temnoschoita Chevrolat (Figure 87), Trigonotarsus Guerin-Meneville (Figure 88), Trochorhopalus Kirsch (Figure 89), Tryphetus Faust (Figure 90), Xerodermus Lacordaire (Figure 91), and Yuccaborus LeConte (Figure 92). Dynamis Chevrolat is not illustred. Among characters considered important to distinguish among the tribes and genera are: the number of frontal setae of the head, the shape of the thoracic and abdominal spiracles, the shape of abdominal segments VIII and IX, the chaetotaxy of the labrum and epipharynx, and the chaetotaxy and overall shape of the mala. Photographs of live adult, larva, and pupa in situ in their hosts are included for Phacecorynes, Sipalinus, and Trigonotarsus (Figure 93 and Figure 94).
Figure 1.
Larva, lateral view: (a) Sitophilus; (b) Stenommatus; (c) Diocalandra; (d) Tryphetus; (e) Eucalandra; and (f) Nephius.
Figure 2.
Larva, lateral view: (a) Phacecorynes; (b) Sphenophorus; (c) Scyphophorus; and (d) Temnoschoita.
Figure 3.
Larva, lateral view: (a) Cosmopolites; (b) Mesocordylus (probably); (c) Eugnoristus; (d) Foveolus; (e) Metamasius; (f) Nassophasis; (g) Odoiporus; (h) Paramasius; and (i) Trochorhopalus.
Figure 4.
Larvae, lateral view: (a) Cyrtotrachelus; (b) Diathetes; (c) Poteriophorus; (d) Sipalinus; (e) Sparganobasis; and (f) Trigonotarsus.
Figure 5.
Thorax and abdomen, larva, lateral view: (a) Phacecorynes zamiae; and (b) Eugnoristus braueri.
Figure 6.
Head, larva, dorsal view: (a) Mesocordylus; (b) Diathetes; (c) Eugnoristus; (d) Foveolus; (e) Odoiporus; (f) Paramasius; (g) Phacecorynes; (h) Sparganobasis; and (i) Trigonotarsus.
Figure 7.
Head, larva, dorsal view: (a) Cyrtotrachelus; (b) Eucalandra; (c) Nephius (=Anius); (d) Cosmopolites; (e) Dryophthorus; (f) Diocalandra; (g) Myocalandra; (h) Nassophasis; (i) Polytus; (j) Rhodobaenus; (k) Rhynchophorus; (l) Poteriophorus; (m) Sphenophorus maidis; (n) Sphenophorus pontederiae; and (o) Trochorhophalus.
Figure 8.
Head, larva, dorsal view: (a) Cyrtotrachelus; and (b) Diocalandra.
Figure 9.
Head, dorsal view and detail of antenna: (a) Nephius (=Anius); and (b) Poteriophorus.
Figure 10.
Thoracic spiracles, larva: (a) Cosmopolites sordidus; (b) Metamasius ritchie; (c) Phacecorynes zamiae; (d) Nephius (=Anius) pauperatus; (e) Trochorhopalus strangulatus; and (f) Rhynchophorus palmarum.
Figure 11.
Thoracic and abdominal spiracles, larva: (a) Metamasius; (b) Phacecorynes; (c) Rhodobaenus; (d) Stenommatus; (e) Trochorhopalus; (f) Cosmopolites; and (g) Rhynchophorus.
Figure 12.
Larvae, lateral view: (a) Nephius (=Anius); (b) Phacecorynes.
Figure 13.
Larvae, lateral view: (a) Eugnoristus (abdomen only); (b) Phacecorynes; and (c) Nephius (=Anius).
Figure 14.
Segments VIII and IX, larva, caudal view: (a) Cosmopolites; (b) Metamasius; (c) Myocalandra; (d) Nassophasis; (e) Phacecorynes; (f) Rhodobaenus; (g) Rhynchophorus; (h) Stenommatus; and (i) Trochorhopalus.
Figure 15.
Labrum, larva: (a) Poteriophorus sp.; and (b) Metamasius hemipterus; lms1–3: labral seta.
Figure 16.
Labrum, larva: (a) Cosmopolites; (b) Myocalandra; (c) Rhodobaenus; and (d) Sphenophorus maidis.
Figure 17.
Epipharynx, larva: (a) Phacecorynes; (b) Rhodobaenus; and (c) Polytus.
Figure 18.
Epipharynx, larva: (a) Myocalandra; and (b) Cyrtotrachelus.
Figure 19.
Epipharynx, larva: (a) Diocalandra; (b) Metamasius; (c) Nephius (=Anius); (d) Trochorhopalus; (e) Eugnoristus; and (f) Phacecorynes.
Figure 20.
Epipharynx, larva: (a) Diocalandra; (b) Eugnoristus; (c) Metamasius; (d) Trochorhopalus; and (e) Sipalinus.
Figure 21.
Epipharynx, larva: (a) Diocalandra; (b) Metamasius; and (c) Phacecorynes.
Figure 22.
Epipharynx, larva: (a) Sitophilus; (b) Eucalandra; and (c) Polytus.
Figure 23.
Epipharynx, larva: (a) Tryphetus; (b) Sphenophorus; (c) Phacecorynes; and (d) Rhynchophorus.
Figure 24.
Epipharynx, larva: (a) Eucalandra; (b) Metamasius; (c) Temnoschoita; (d) Stenommatus; and (e) Trochorhopalus.
Figure 25.
Epipharynx, larva: (a) Tryphetus; (b) Poteriophorus; (c) Sipalinus; (d) Yuccaborus; (e) Rhynchophorus; and (f) Cyrtotrachelus. Als1–3: anterolateral setae of epipharynx.
Figure 26.
Epipharynx, larva: (a) Cactophagus; (b) Eucalandra; and (c) Sipalnus.
Figure 27.
Epipharynx, larva: (a) Phacecorynes; (b) Temnoschoita; (c) Poteriophorus; and (d) Rhinostomus. Mes3: median epipharyngeal setae; ams1, 2: anteromedian setae of epipharynx.
Figure 28.
Epipharynx, larva: (a) Poteriophorus; (b) Metamasius; and (c) Yuccaborus. Mes3: median epipharyngeal setae; ams1, 2: anteromedian setae of epipharynx.
Figure 29.
Epipharynx, larva: (a) Eucalandra; (b) Phacecorynes; and (c) Rhodobaenus.
Figure 30.
Epipharynx, larva: (a) Foveolus; (b) Cosmopolites; and (c) Rhinostomus.
Figure 31.
Epipharynx, larva: (a) Sphenophorus pontederiae; and (b) Nephius (=Anius).
Figure 32.
Epipharynx, larva: (a) Sphenophorus maidis; and (b) Nassophasis.
Figure 33.
Epipharynx, larva: (a) Nephius (=Anius); (b) Eugnoristus; (c) Sipalinus; and (d) Yuccaborus.
Figure 34.
Epipharynx, larva: (a) Nassophasis; (b) Rhynchophorus palmarum; (c) Yuccaborus.
Figure 35.
Mandible, larva: (a) Eucalandra; (b) Nassophasis; and (c) Polytus.
Figure 36.
Mandible, larva: (a) Cyrtotrachelus; and (b) Polytus.
Figure 37.
Mandible, larva: (a) Cyrtotrachelus; and (b) Polytus.
Figure 38.
Head and mandibles, larva, anterior view: (a) Dryophthorus; and (b) Diocalandra.
Figure 39.
Hypopharynx, mala, and maxillary palp, larva, dorsal view: (a) Myocalandra; and (b) Nassophasis.
Figure 40.
Hypopharynx, mala, and maxillary palp, larva, dorsal view: (a) Diocalandra; (b) Polytus; (c) Temnoschoita; and (d) Sipalinus.
Figure 41.
Mala and maxillary palp, larva, dorsal view: (a) Cactophagus; (b) Cosmopolites; and (c) Rhynchophorus.
Figure 42.
Mala and maxillary palp, larva, dorsal view: (a) Dryophthorus; (b) Sipalinus; (c) Rhodobaenus; and (d) Trigonotarsus.
Figure 43.
Hypopharynx, mala, and maxillary palp, larva, dorsal view: (a) Sipalinus; (b) Poteriophorus; (c) Nephius (=Anius); and (d) Cyrtotrachelus. Dms: dorsal malar setae.
Figure 44.
Hypopharynx, mala, and maxillary palp, larva, dorsal view: (a) Stenommatus; and (b) Rhynchophorus.
Figure 45.
Hypopharynx, mala and maxillary palp, larva, dorsal view: (a) Tryphetus; (b) Myocalandra; (c) Stenommatus (d) Eucalandra; (e) Odoiporus; (f) Rhynchophorus; (g) Sipalinus; and (h) Cyrtotrachelus.
Figure 46.
Hypopharynx, mala and maxillary palp, larva, dorsal view: (a) Cactophagus; and (b) Cosmopolites.
Figure 47.
Mala and maxillary palp (d only), larva, dorsal view: (a) Rhodobaenus; (b) Temnoschoita; (c) Myocalandra; and (d) Eucalandra.
Figure 48.
Mala and maxillary palp, larva, dorsal view: (a) Rhodobaenus; (b) Diocalandra; (c) Eucalandra; (d) Poteriophorus; (e) Temnoschoita; and (f) Sipalinus.
Figure 49.
Mala, larva, dorsal view: (a) Cosmopolites; (b) Polytus; (c) Sipalinus; and (d Nassophasis.
Figure 50.
Mala, larva, ventral view: (a) Tryphetus; and (b) Cyrtotrachelus.
Figure 51.
Labium, labio-maxillary complex: (a) Rhynchophorus; and (b) Sphenophorus.
Figure 52.
Labium, larva: (a) Poteriophorus; (b) Eucalandra; and (c) Yuccaborus. Lgs1, 2: ligular setae.
Figure 53.
Labium, larva: (a) Stenommatus; and (b) Polytus.
Figure 54.
Labium, larva: (a) Dryophthorus; and (b) Cosmopolites.
Figure 55.
Labium, larva: (a) Phacecorynes; (b) Sipalnus; (c) Cosmopolites; and (d) Nephius.
3.1. Synoptic Key to Larval Dryophthorinae
3.1.1. Habitus
1. Body length of mature larva
- a.
- Small (~2–8 mm) (Figure 1)Diocalandra*, Dryophthoroides, Dryophthorus, Eucalandra*, Myocalandra*, Nephius (=Anius), Polytus, Stenommatus, Tryphetus, Xerodermus
- b.
- Cactophagus, Cosmopolites, Diathetes*, Diocalandra*, Eucalandra*, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Myocalandra*, Nassophasis, Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Poteriophorus*, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Scyphophorus, Sparganobasis*, Sphenophorus, Temnoschoita, Trochorhopalus
- c.
- Large (~16–40 mm) (Figure 4)Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes*, Dynamis, Poteriophorus*, Rhinostomus, Rhynchophorus, Sipalinus, Sitophilus, Sparganobasis*, Trigonotarsus, Yuccaborus
2. Expansion of abdomen ventrolaterally from segments II, III, or IV to V or VI, abruptly narrowed posterad
- a.
- PresentCactophagus, Cosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Dynamis [13], Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Stenommatus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Xerodermus [11], Yuccaborus
- b.
- AbsentSitophilus, Tryphetus
3. Location of anus (=position of segment X) (Figure 5)
- a.
- Ventral, subapicalCactophagus, Cosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Dynamis [13], Eucalandra, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhinostomus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Stenommatus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Xerodermus [11], Yuccaborus
- b.
- TerminalEugnoristus, Sitophilus, Tryphetus
3.1.2. Head
- a.
- 8 (4 pairs) (fs1 absent)Cyrtotrachelus#
- b.
- 10 (5 pairs)Cactophagus, Cosmopolites, Diathetes, Diocalandra (fs1 minute), Dynamis [13], Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhinostomus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Sitophilus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus, Yuccaborus
- c.
- 12 (6 pairs)Dryophthorus, StenommatusNot included: Dryophthoroides, Xerodermus
2. Minute, clumped asperites (leopard-like) surface (Figure 8)
- a.
- Prominent laterally and mediallyCyrtotrachelus
- b.
- AbsentCactophagus, Cosmopolites, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthorus, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sitophilus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Stenommatus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus, YuccaborusNot included: Dryophthoroides, Xerodermus
3. Sensorium of antenna (Figure 9)
- a.
- Apical, convex sensorium moderately sized in relation to cushion-like, basal segmentCactophagus, Cosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Dynamis [13], Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Nassophasis, Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Polytus#*, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Yuccaborus (seemingly 2 sensoria)
- b.
- Conical, sensorium relatively enlargedDiocalandra, Dryophthorus, Myocalandra#, Nephius (=Anius), Polytus#*, Sitophilus, Stenommatus, Xerodermus [11], TryphetusNot included: Dryophthoroides (but possibly b), Rhinostomus
3.1.3. Thorax
1. Relative length of orifice and airtube of thoracic spiracle (Figure 10)
- a.
- Orifice 4 times longer than air tubeCosmopolites, Temnoschoita, Yuccaborus#*
- b.
- Orifice 3–4 times longer than air tube (elongate)Cactophagus, Metamasius ritchei*, Odoiporus, Rhabdoscelus*, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus*, Trigonotarsus
- c.
- Orifice 2.5–2 times longer than air tube lengthDiocalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Rhabdoscelus*, Sitophilus granarius*, Sphenophorus pontederiae, Tryphetus
- d.
- Orifice as long as air tubeDiathetes, Nephius (=Anius), Nassophasis, Scyphophorus, Sitophilus granarius*, Sphenophorus maidis, Sphenophorus cariosus, Xerodermus [11]
- e.
- Orifice shorter than length of air tube (less than 3/4 length)Drophthorus, Metamasius ritchiei?* (USNMENT01448165), Mesocordylus#, Myocalandra, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhodobaenus, Stenommatus, Trochorhopalus
- f.
- Lacks air tubesCyrtotrachelus, Dynamis [13], Rhynchophorus, Sipalinus#* see [12], Yuccaborus* (perhaps a separate state is warranted to accommodate the uniquely shaped spiracles (rounded, non-slit like orifice with small, non-scalloped airtubes) present in Yuccaborus and perhaps Sipalinus and Cyrtotrachelus.)
- g.
- Spiracles functionally absent, vestigialEucalandra#, Sipalinus#*Not included: Dryophthoroides, Rhinostomus
3.1.4. Abdomen
1. Functional spiracles of segments I-VII (Figure 11)
- a.
- Prominent and all sub-equal in sizeCactophagus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Nassophasis, Odoiporus, Paramasius, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Phacecorynes, Rhodobaenus, Scyphophorus, Sitophilus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Tryphetus
- b.
- Very smallCosmopolites*, Myocalandra*, Xerodermus* [11], Sipalinus (Gardner [12] states these are present on all segments, however, spiracles are usually very difficult to observe and may be misinterpreted as “e”.) # [12]
- c.
- Present only on VIIDryophthoroides [12], Nephius (=Anius)
- d.
- Present only on I and VIIStenommatus
- e.
- Present, but II, III, and IV reduced in size by about halfTrochorhopalus
- f.
- None discernable, absentCyrtotrachelus, Cosmopolites*, Dryophthorus, Polytus, Dynamis, Myocalandra* (may be interpreted as being absent), Rhynchophorus, Xerodermus [12], YuccaborusNot included: Rhinostomus
2. Abdominal segment VIII (Figure 12)
- a.
- With a pair of digitate projectionsDryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus (reduced), Mesocordylus (probably) (reduced), Nephius (=Anius), Sipalinus, Xerodermus [11,12], Yuccaborus
- b.
- Without a pair of digitate projectionsCactophagus, Cosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dynamis [13], Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sitophilus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Stenommatus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, TryphetusNot included: Rhinostomus
3. Posterior margin of abdominal segment IX (Figure 13)
- a.
- Without a pair of projections, may be broad and truncateCactophagus, Cosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus, Diocalandra, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Odoiporus, Paramasius, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhynchophorus, Sitophilus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Temnoschoita, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus
- b.
- With 1 pair of digitate projectionsDiathetes, Dryophthorus, Dryophthoroides [12], Phacecorynes, Rhodobaenus, Scyphophorus, Stenommatus, Trigonotarsus, Xerodermus [11,12], Yuccaborus
- c.
- With 2 pairs of digitate projectionsMesocordylus (probably), Nephius (=Anius), SipalinusNot included: Dynamis, Rhinostomus
4. Shape of posterior abdominal digitate projections of segment IX (Figure 14)
- a.
- Not applicableCactophagus, Cosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes* (may be misinterpreted as this), Diocalandra, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Odoiporus, Paramasius, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhynchophorus, Sitophilus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Temnoschoita, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus
- b.
- Short and bluntly conicalDiathetes*, Rhodobaenus, Trigonotarsus
- c.
- 1.5 to 2× longer than wide (long and broad; reference widest section)Dryophthorus, Dryophthoroides [12], Mesocordylus (probably), Nephius (=Anius), Phacecorynes, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Stenommatus, Xerodermus [11,12], YuccaborusNot included: Dynamis, Rhinostomus
3.1.5. Labrum/Eipharynx
1. Shape of labral seta 2 (lms2) (Figure 15)
- a.
- EntireCactophagus, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthorus, Eugnoristus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius*, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Paramasius Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sitophilus, Sphenophorus, Stenommatus, Temnoschoita*, Trigonotarsus Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus, Yuccaborus
- a.
- Branched (at least 1)Cosmopolites, Eucalandra, Foveolus, Metamasius hemipterus*, Odoiporus, Temnoschoita*Not included: Dryophthoroides, Dynamis, Rhinostomus, Sparganobasis (broken), Xerodermus
2. Peg-like pore basally on labrum (Figure 16)
- a.
- AbsentCosmopolites, Dryophthorus, Nassophasis#, Sitophilus*, Sphenophorus#*, Stenommatus
- b/c.
- Single medially/submediallyCactophagus (Right), Diocalandra (Medially), Eucalandra (Left)#*, Eugnoristus (L), Foveolus (L), Mesocordylus (probably) (M), Metamasius (M), Myocalandra (M), Nephius (=Anius)#, Paramasius (R/L), Phacecorynes (R), Polytus (M), Poteriophorus (R), Rhabdoscelus (R), Rhodobaenus (R), Sitophilus oryzae*(Medial/L), Sparganobasis (L), Temnoschoita (R), Trochorhopalus (M, slight R), Tryphetus (M)
- d.
- Two submediallyCyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Eucalandra#*, Odoiporus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sphenophorus* maidis, Trigonotarsus, YuccaborusNot included: Dryophthoroides, Xerodermus
3. Shape of epipharynx (Figure 17)
- a.
- Sub-rectangular, margin evenly rounded or moderately to weakly produced mediallyCactophagus, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Dynamis [13], Eucalandra, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus#*, Rhinostomus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sitophilus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Stenommatus, Trigonotarsus (medially emarginated), Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus, Xerodermus* ([11], p. 41) “Labrum strongly transverse, anterior margin trilobed, posterior margin extended medially.”), Yuccaborus
- b.
- Sub-rectangular, margin truncateEugnoristus, Metamasius, Rhabdoscelus#*, Rhodobaenus, Temnoschoita
- c.
- Sub-quadrate, markedly produced mediallyCosmopolites, Polytus
4. Lateral asperites/setae on epipharynx (Figure 18)
- a.
- AbsentDiocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Myocalandra, Polytus, Sitophilus, Stenommatus, Tryphetus
- b.
- PresentCactophagus, Cosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus (present basolaterally), Diathetes, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably) (present basolaterally), Metamasius, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhinostomus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, YuccaborusNot included: Dynamis, Xerodermus
5. Modification of lateral setae on epipharynx (Figure 19)
- a.
- Setae absentDiocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Myocalandra, Polytus, Sitophilus, Stenommatus, Tryphetus
- b.
- Not modified (straight, tapering)Cosmopolites*, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Eucalandra, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Rhinostomus, Sipalinus, Sphenophorus*, Trigonotarsus, Yuccaborus* (on one side)
- c.
- TwistedNephius (=Anius)
- d.
- Curved mesallyFoveolus* (anteriorly), Paramasius, Trochorhopalus (with rounded asperites medially)
- e.
- Asperites throughoutEugnoristus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus
- f.
- Asprites distally or medially, setose proximally (and laterally)Cactophagus, Cosmopolites*, Foveolus*, Nassophasis, Odoiporus, Phacecorynes, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus*, Temnoschoita, Yuccaborus*Not included: Dynamis, Xerodermus
6. Distribution of lateral microsetae/asperites of epipharynx (Figure 20)
- a.
- Setae absentDiocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Myocalandra, Polytus, Sitophilus, Stenommatus, Tryphetus
- b.
- 1/3–1/4 distal length of labral rodsEucalandra, Eugnoristus, Rhabdoscelus
- c/d.
- Variously patterned, entire length or between 1/2–2/3 distal length of labral rodsCactophagus, Cosmopolites, Foveolus, Metamasius, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Poteriophorus, Rhinostomus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Temnoschoita, Trochorhopalus
- e.
- Throughout area 2/3 or less proximal length of labral rodsCyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Mesocordylus (probably), Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Trigonotarsus#, YuccaborusNot included: Dynamis, Xerodermus
7. Lateral microsetae/asperites of epipharynx (Rhynchophorus and Cyrtotrachelus have large setae on the lateral margin) (Figure 21)
- a.
- Setae absentDiocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Myocalandra, Polytus, Sitophilus, Stenommatus, Temnoschoita, Tryphetus
- b.
- Not reaching lateral margin of labrumCactophagus, Cyrtotrachelus, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Paramasius, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Sphenophorus, Trochorhopalus, Yuccaborus
- c.
- Reaching lateral margin of labrumCosmopolites, Diathetes, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Phacecorynes, Rhinostomus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus (minimally), Sparganobasis, TrigonotarsusNot included: Dynamis, Xerodermus
8. Mesal asperites on epipharynx (Figure 22)
- a.
- AbsentSitophilus, Tryphetus
- b.
- Present over labral rodsEucalandra
- c.
- Present mediallyCactophagus, Cosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhinostomus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Stenommatus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, YuccaborusNot included: Dynamis, Xerodermus
9. Modification of mesal asperites of epipharynx (Figure 23)
- a.
- Asperites absentSitophilus, Tryphetus
- b.
- Setae onlyCosmopolites*, Cyrtotrachelus, Sphenophorus
- c.
- Asperites onlyCactophagus, Cosmopolites*, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthorus, Eugnoristus, Mesocordylus (probably), Myocalandra, Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Poteriophorus, Rhinostomus, Rhodobaenus, Sipalinus, Sparganobasis, Stenommatus*, Trochorhopalus (possibly a few setae)
- d.
- Setae and asperitesEucalandra, Foveolus, Metamasius, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius) (rounded asperites), Polytus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Stenommatus*, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, YuccaborusNot included: Dynamis, Dryophthoroides, Xerodermus (([11], p. 41) “…between the posteriorly conjoined rods is a pair of short setae and numerous skin points.”) (maybe “a”)
10. Orientation/placement of mesal asperites of epipharynx (Figure 24)
- a.
- Asperites absent or on labral rodsEucalandra, Sitophilus, Tryphetus
- b.
- Forming a well defined elongate, mesal glabrous areaFoveolus*, Metamasius, Nassophasis, Rhinostomus, Rhodobaenus, Sphenophorus*
- c.
- Forming a well defined subrectangular, mesal glabrous areaFoveolus* (could be interpreted as “b”), Paramasius, Temnoschoita
- d.
- Glabrous mesal area, but loosely defined by asperitesCyrtotrachelus, Diocalandra, Myocalandra, Nephius (=Anius), Phacecorynes, Rhynchophorus, Sipalinus, Sphenophorus*, Stenommatus
- e.
- Without mesal glabrous area (between asperites)Cactophagus, Cosmopolites, Diathetes, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Eugnoristus, Mesocordylus (probably), Odoiporus, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Scyphophorus, Sparganobasis, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, YuccaborusNot included: Dynamis, Xerodermus
11. Number of anterolateral epipharyngeal setae (als) (Figure 25)
- a.
- 2 on each sideSitophilus, Tryphetus
- b.
- 3 on each sideCactophagus, Cosmopolites, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, F7veolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus* (on one side, but probably unusual), Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Stenommatus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Xerodermus [11]
- c.
- 4 on each sideSipalinus*, Yuccaborus*
- d.
- 5 on each sideYuccaborus*
- e.
- 10–11 on each sideDynamis [13], Rhinostomus (10), Rhynchophorus (11)
- f.
- At least 14 on each sideCyrtotrachelus
12. Shape of anterolateral epipharyngeal setae (als 1, 2, 3) (Figure 26)
- a.
- Tapering to apexCactophagus, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus (sometimes subapically expanded before tapering), Sitophilus, Sphenophorus*, Stenommatus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus, Xerodermus [11]
- b.
- BifurcateCosmopolites, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus (als1 bifurcate, als2 trifurcate), Odoiporus, Sphenophorus*
- c.
- Deeply trifurcate, multifurcate (tufted)Rhinostomus, Sipalinus, YuccaborusNot included: Dynamis, Sparganobasis (broken/ equally weathered?)
13. Shape of anteromedian epipharyngeal seta 1 (ams1) (Figure 27)
- a.
- EntireCactophagus, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Mesocordylus (probably), Myocalandra, Nephius (=Anius), Phacecorynes, Polytus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Sitophilus, Sphenophorus*, Stenommatus, Trigonotarsus#, Tryphetus, Xerodermus [11]
- a.
- BifurcateCosmopolites*, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Metamasius, Nassophasis, Paramasius, Poteriophorus*, Rhabdoscelus, Scyphophorus*, Sphenophorus*, Temnoschoita, Trochorhopalus
- c.
- Trifurcate (largely)Cosmopolites*, Foveolus* (could be interpreted as “c”), Odoiporus, Poteriophorus*, Scyphophorus*, Sipalinus
- d.
- Multifurcate, tuftedFoveolus*, Rhinostomus, YuccaborusNot included: Dynamis, Sparganobasis (broken/weathered all equally?)
14. Shape of anteromedian epipharyngeal seta 2 (ams2) (Figure 28)
- a.
- EntireCactophagus, Cosmopolites*, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Mesocordylus (probably), Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sitophilus, Sphenophorus, Stenommatus, Trigonotarsus (but could be broken), Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus, Xerodermus [11]
- b.
- BifurcateCosmopolites*, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Metamasius, Odoiporus, Sipalinus, Temnoschoita
- c.
- Tufted (deeply furcate)Rhinostomus, YuccaborusNot included: Dynamis, Sparganobasis (broken/weathered all equally?)
15. Relative length of ams1 and ams2 (Figure 29)
- a.
- Sub-equalCactophagus, Diocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus*, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Paramasius, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhinostomus, Scyphophorus*, Sipalinus, Sitophilus, Sphenophorus, Stenommatus#, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus, Yuccaborus
- b.
- ams1 approximately twice as long as ams2Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Eugnoristus*, Phacecorynes, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus*
- c.
- ams1 approximately 1/3 longer than ams2Cosmopolites, Metamasius, Rhodobaenus, TemnoschoitaNot included: Sparganobasis (broken/weathered), Trigonotarsus (broken/weathered; maybe b/c), Xerodermus
16. Position of median epipharyngeal setae 3 (mes3) (Figure 30)
- a.
- mes3 anterad on margin between 2 ams pairs; linear (this interpretation gives the appearance of 6 ams)Cactophagus, Eucalandra, Foveolus, Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Sipalinus, Sitophilus, Sphenophorus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus
- b.
- mes3 proximal and almost directly in front of ams1; not linearCosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus#, Eugnoristus, Mesocordylus (probably), Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sparganobasis, Stenommatus, Xerodermus [12], Yuccaborus
- c.
- mes3 proximal and almost directly in front of ams2; not linearRhinostomus
17. Minute setae apically on labrum/epipharynx (Figure 31)
- a.
- AbsentCactophagus, Cosmopolites, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius*, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Odoiporus, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhinostomus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sitophilus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus pontederiae*, Stenommatus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus, Yuccaborus
- b.
- PresentCyrtotrachelus, Metamasius*, Nephius (=Anius), Paramasius, Sphenophorus*Not included: Dynamis, Xerodermus
18. Short setae at the base of ams1, ams2, and mes3 (Figure 32)
- a.
- AbsentCactophagus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhinostomus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sitophilus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus maidis*, Stenommatus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus, Yuccaborus
- b.
- PresentCosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus, Nassophasis, Paramasius, Sphenophorus pontederiae*Not included: Dynamis, Xerodermus
19. Shape of mes3 apically (Figure 33)
- a.
- EntireCactophagus, Cosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthorus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nephius (=Anius), Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sitophilus, Sphenophorus*, Stenommatus, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus, Xerodermus [11]
- b.
- BifurcateEucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Nassophasis, Sphenophorus*, Temnoschoita
- c.
- TrifurcateOdoiporus, Sipalinus
- d.
- TuftedRhinostomus, YuccaborusNot included: Dynamis, Sparganobasis (broken/weathered all equally?), Trigonotarsus (broken, weathered, maybe “a”)
20. Condition of mes1 (Figure 34)
- a.
- Present, unmodifiedCactophagus, Cosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhinostomus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus*, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus (very lightly sclerotized), Sitophilus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Stenommatus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus, Xerodermus [11]
- b.
- Present, minute (approximately 1/4 size of mes2)Odoiporus, Rhynchophorus*
- c.
- Trifurcate (tufted)Foveolus (shallow), YuccaborusNot included: Dynamis
3.1.6. Mandibles (Orientation of Mandibles on a Slide Preparation May Obscure Some of the Characters)
1. Number of incisor cusps of mandible (Figure 35)
- a.
- SingleCactophagus, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Nephius (=Anius), Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus#, Sitophilus granarius, Sitophilus linearis, Sparganobasis (with sub-apical lobe), Sphenophorus, Trigonotarsus, Yuccaborus
- b.
- BidentateCosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Stenommatus, Temnoschoita, Trochorhopalus#, Tryphetus, Xerodermus [11]
- c.
- TridentatePolytusNot included: Dryophthorus, Metamasius, Rhinostomus
2. Internal edge with elongate concavity (Figure 36)
- a.
- AbsentCactophagus, Cyrtotrachelus, Dryophthorus, Eucalandra, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Poteriophorus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sitophilus granarius, Sitophilus linearis, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Yuccaborus
- b.
- PresentCosmopolites, Diathetes (apparently doble), Diocalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Mesocordylus#, Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, StenommatusNot included: Dryophthoroides, Dynamis, Metamasius, Sipalinus, Rhinostomus, Xerodermus
3. Pair of deltoid projections at base of concavity (Figure 37)
- a.
- AbsentCactophagus, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthorus, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sitophilus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Stenommatus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus, Yuccaborus
- b.
- PresentCosmopolites, Foveolus, Odoiporus, PolytusNot included: Dryophthoroides, Dynamis, Rhinostomus, Xerodermus
4. Granular area on subapical surface of mandible (Figure 38)
- a.
- AbsentCactophagus, Cosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sitophilus*, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Stenommatus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus
- b.
- PresentDryophthorus, Sitophilus* granarius, Yuccaborus (basally, reduced)Not included: Dryophthoroides, Dynamis, Rhinostomus, Xerodermus
3.1.7. Hypopharynx
1. Setation of lateral lobes of hypopharynx (Figure 39)
- a.
- Reduced setationDiocalandra*, Dryophthorus, Eucalandra#, Eugnoristus#, Myocalandra, Sitophilus#, Stenommatus, Tryphetus#
- b.
- PubescentCactophagus, Cosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra*, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, YuccaborusNot included: Dryophthoroides, Rhinostomus, Xerodermus
2. Location of setae on hypopharynx (Figure 40)
- a.
- Laterad, medially glabrousCyrtotrachelus, Diocalandra, Dryophthorus, Mesocordylus (probably), Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius)*, Phacecorynes, Rhodobaenus, Sitophilus, Sphenophorus*, Stenommatus, Tryphetus
- b.
- Laterad with scattered medial setaeCosmopolites, Foveolus, Nephius (=Anius)*, Polytus
- c.
- Covering anterior margin not extending beyond length of malaEugnoristus#, Temnoschoita
- d.
- Covering anterior margin and extending posterad beyond mala, usually in a narrow pubescent lateral strip resulting in a glabrous medial areaCactophagus, Diathetes, Eucalandra, Metamasius, Odoiporus, Paramasius, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sparganobasis#, Sphenophorus*, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, YuccaborusNot included: Dryophthoroides, Dynamis, Rhinostomus, Xerodermus
3.1.8. Maxilla
1. Shape of mala (Figure 41)
- a.
- Digitate (anterior margin rounded)Cactophagus, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Eucalandra, Mesocordylus (probably), Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Scyphophorus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus* (but could be interpreted as “b” by some), Temnoschoita, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus
- b.
- Subquadrate (anterior margin angled but distinctly truncate)Cosmopolites, Eugnoristus, Metamasius, Polytus, Rhodobaenus, Sipalinus, Sitophilus, Sphenophorus* (but could be interpreted as “a” by some), Yuccaborus
- c.
- Quadrate (anterior margin truncate)Foveolus, Rhynchophorus, Stenommatus, TrigonotarsusNot included: Xerodermus, Rhinostomus
2. Asperites/microsetae on dorsal mala (Figure 42)
- a.
- None discernableCyrtotrachelus, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Mesocordylus (probably), Myocalandra, Rhabdoscelus, Sitophilus, Stenommatus
- b.
- Present but not between dmsDiocalandra, Nassophasis, Phacecorynes, Rhodobaenus *(may be misinterpreted as “c”), Rhynchophorus, Sipalinus, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus
- c.
- Present at base of and between dmsCactophagus, Cosmopolites (asperites mostly), Diathetes (dms 3–8), Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus (dms 2–8), Metamasius, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus (copious amounts), Paramasius (dms 1–8), Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhodobaenus* (but setae not asperites), Scyphophorus, Sparganobasis (only at base of dms 2–8), Sphenophorus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Yuccaborus
- d.
- Present between dms 4–8 and as a distinct rounded area of microsetae (dms 1–3)TrigonotarsusNot included: Rhinostomus, Xerodermus
3. Asperites/microsetae on stipes distally (base of maxillary palp), dorsal view (Figure 43)
- a.
- None discernableDryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Foveolus (but asperites at base of mala), Metamasius, Myocalandra, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Rhabdoscelus, Sipalinus, Sitophilus, Sphenophorus*, Stenommatus, Tryphetus
- b.
- Asperites presentCactophagus, Cosmopolites, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Mesocordylus (probably) (serrate), Nassophasis, Odoiporus, Paramasius, Poteriophorus, Rhodobaenus (very fine), Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus* (very fine), Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Yuccaborus
- c.
- Elongate and thin setae presentNephius (=Anius)
- d.
- Elongate and stout setae presentCyrtotrachelusNot included: Dynamis, Rhinostomus, Xerodermus
4. Arrangement of dorsal malar setae (dms) (Figure 44)
- a.
- Regularly aligned in single row (dms 7,8 may sometimes be more lateral, but always in a single file)Cactophagus (dms 7,8 laterad), Cosmopolites, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Eucalandra (dms 7,8 somewhat distant from dms 3–8), Eugnoristus, Foveolus (dms 7,8 somewhat distant from dms 1–6), Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius (dms 7,8 somewhat distant from dms 3–8), Myocalandra, Nassophasis (dms 7,8 somewhat distant from dms 1–6), Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Paramasius (dms 7,8 somewhat distant from dms 1–6), Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus (dms 7,8 somewhat distant from dms 1–6), Rhabodscelus (dms 7,8 somewhat distant from dms 1–6), Rhodobaenus (dms 7,8 somewhat distant from dms 1–6), Scyphophorus (dms 7,8 somewhat distant from dms 1–6), Sipalinus, Sitophilus oryzae#(some Sitophilus may have dms irregularly distributed), Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus (dms 7,8 somewhat distant from dms 1–6), Stenommatus, Temnoschoita (dms 7,8 somewhat distant from dms 1–6), Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus, Xerodermus [11], Yuccaborus
- b.
- Regularly distributed medially, proximally somewhat clumpedCyrtotrachelus, Rhynchophorus, Trigonotarsus#Not included: Dynamis, Rhinostomus
5. Number of dorsal malar setae (dms) (Figure 45)
- a.
- Less than five (5)Sitophilus (but unclear)
- b.
- Six (6)Dryophthoroides# ([12], (p. 253) “…row of about six fissile setae and one or two simple setae.”), Dryophthorus, Eugnoristus* (but not entirely clear), Tryphetus#*, Xerodermus [11]
- c.
- Seven (7)Myocalandra
- d.
- Seven (7) (with a small pore)Stenommatus
- e.
- Eight (8)Cactophagus, Cosmopolites, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus*, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Scyphophorus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus#*
- f.
- Ten (10)Odoiporus (10–11), Yuccaborus
- g.
- Fourteen (14)Rhynchophorus
- h.
- Fifteen (15)Sipalinus
- i.
- More than 30CyrtotrachelusNot included: Dynamis, Rhinostomus
6. Shape of dorsal malar setae (dms) (if at least one is branching, select b, see next couplet) (Figure 46)
- a.
- EntireCactophagus, Cyrtotrachelus (possibly some distally may be superficially branched), Phacecorynes, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus (occasional bifurcate seta), Sitophilus, Tryphetus
- b.
- BranchingCosmopolites, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Paramasius, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Stenommatus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Xerodermus [11], Yuccaborus (tufted)Not included: Dynamis, Rhinostomus
7. Progression of branching of dorsal malar setae (dms) (this is a more generalized version of character 8 below) (Figure 47)
- a.
- Entire, not branchingCactophagus, Cyrtotrachelus (possibly some distally may be superficially branched), Phacecorynes, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus (occasional bifurcate seta), Sitophilus, Tryphetus
- b.
- All dms equally branchingCosmopolites, Diocalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Nassophasis, Odoiporus, Paramasius*, Polytus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Temnoschoita, Yuccaborus
- c.
- Branching dms distally decreasingDiathetes (dms 3–8 branching), Dryophthoroides [12], Dryophthorus, Mesocordylus (probably), Myocalandra, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Stenommatus, Trigonotarsus
- d.
- Branching dms distally increasedEucalandra, Metamasius, Nephius (=Anius), Paramasius*, Sparganobasis (dms 8 bifurcate, others trifurcate?), Sphenophorus, TrochorhopalusNot included: Dynamis, Rhinostomus, Xerodermus
8. Variation of branching of dms (slight plasticity may exist and should be considered; this couplet is a more complicated (less generalized) version of couplets #6, 7 above) (Figure 48)
- a.
- Not branchingCactophagus, Cyrtotrachelus (distal setae may be superficially branched), Phacecorynes, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus (occasional bifurcate seta), Sitophilus, Tryphetus
- b.
- All bifurcateCosmopolites, Diocalandra, Eugnoristus, Paramasius*, Polytus, Sparganobasis
- c.
- Some dms entire, others bifurcateDiathetes [dms 1–2 entire, dms 3–8 bifurcate (shallow)], Dryophthorus (dms 2–6 bifurcate, dms 1 entire), Eucalandra (dms 1–6 bifurcate, dms 7, dms 8 entire), Mesocordylus (probably) (dms 1–5 entire, dms 6–8 bifurcate), Metamasius (dms 1–6 bifurcate, dms 7, dms 8 entire; sometimes dms 7 or 8 may be bifurcate), Myocalandra (dms 1–6 entire, dms 7 bifurcate), Nephius (=Anius) (dms 1–6 bifurcate, dms 7, dms 8 entire), Paramasius* (dms 1–7 bifurcate, dms 8 enitre), Sphenophorus (dms 1–6 bifurcate, dms 7, dms 8 entire), Stenommatus (dms 1 entire, dms 2–7 bifurcate), Trochorhopalus (dms 1–6 bifurcate, dms 7, dms 8 entire)
- d.
- Some dms bifurcate, others multifurcateDryophthoroides#* (([12], p. 253) “…row of about six fissile setae and one or two simple setae.”) [12], Poteriophorus (dms 1–3 bifurcate, dms 4–8 tufted, shallow and multi-furcate), Rhabdoscelus (dms 1–2, 8 bifurcate, dms 3–7 multifurcate), Scyphophorus [dms 1–6 bifurcate, dms 7, 8 tufted (deeply and multi-furcate)], Trigonotarsus (dms 1–5 bifurcate, dms 6–8 multifurcate)
- e.
- All tufted (shallow and multi-furcate)Dryophthoroides#* [12], Foveolus (with long setae at base), Nassophasis, Odoiporus, Temnoschoita
- f.
- All tufted (deeply and multi-furcate)Sipalinus, YuccaborusNot included: Dynamis, Rhinostomus, Xerodermus ([11], (p. 41) “…mala with several branched setae, six of them in a longitudinal row not extending far from apex.”)
9. Ventral malar setae (vms) (Figure 49)
- a.
- UnbranchedCactopahgus, Cosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthorus, Eucalandra, Mesocordylus (probably), Myocalandra, Nephius (=Anius), Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sitophilus, Sparganobasis Sphenophorus, Stenommatus, Tryphetus
- b.
- One (1) branched, remainder unbranchedPolytus, Rhabdoscelus, Trigonotarsus#
- c.
- Two (2) branchedFoveolus#*, Eugnoristus, Metamasius, Sipalinus, Trochorhopalus
- d.
- More than two branchedFoveolus#*, Nassophasis, Odoiporus (3), Poteriophorus, Temnoschoita, Yuccaborus (at least 3)Not included: Dryophthoroides, Dynamis, Rhinostomus, Xerodermus
10. Pair of short, contiguous vms4 and vms3 (bilobed vms3?) (Figure 50)
- a.
- AbsentCactopahgus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthorus, Eugnoristus, Foveolus#*, Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sphenophorus, Stenommatus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus (apparently very small one present, but unclear), Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus, Yuccaborus
- b.
- PresentCosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus, Eucalandra, Foveolus#*, Mesocordylus (probably), Polytus, Sitophilus, Sparganobasis (bilobed vms3?)Not included: Dryophthoroides, Dynamis, Rhinostomus, Xerodermus
3.1.9. Labium
1. Ligula with copious apical setation (Figure 51)
- a.
- AbsentCactopahgus, Cosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Eucalandra, Mesocordylus (probably), Nassophasis, Odoiporus, Phacecorynes, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sitophilus, Sparganobasis, Trigonotarsus, Tryphetus, Yuccaborus
- b.
- PresentDiocalandra, Dryophthorus (small amounts of setae), Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nephius (=Anius), Paramasius, Polytus, Sphenophorus, Stenommatus (reduced), Temnoschoita, Trochorhopalus (reduced), Xerodermus [11]Not included: Dryophthoroides, Dynamis, Rhinostomus
2. Ligular seta 1 (lgs1) (Figure 52)
- a.
- EntireCactopahgus, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthorus, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Paramasius, Poteriophorus, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sitophilus, Sparganobasis (broken/weathered), Sphenophorus, Stenommatus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus, Xerodermus [11]
- b.
- BranchedCosmopolites, Eucalandra, Odoiporus
- c.
- TuftedYuccaborusNot included: Dryophthoroides, Dynamis, Rhinostomus, Sipalinus
3. Position of postmental setae (pms1, 2, 3) (Figure 53)
- a.
- LinearDryophthorus, Mesocordylus (probably), Stenommatus
- b.
- Not linearCactophagus, Cosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sitophilus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus, YuccaborusNot included: Dryophthoroides, Dynamis, Rhinostomus, Xerodermus
4. Second labial palpomere (Figure 54)
- a.
- Absent/reducedDryophthorus, Stenommatus
- b.
- Present, prominentCactophagus, Cosmopolites, Cyrtotrachelus, Diathetes, Diocalandra, Dryophthoroides [12], Eucalandra, Eugnoristus, Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Nephius (=Anius), Odoiporus, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Polytus, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhodobaenus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sipalinus, Sitophilus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus, Xerodermus [11], Yuccaborus
5. Pigmentation of premental sclerite (Figure 55)
- a.
- TridentCactophagus, Cyrtotrachelus, Diocalandra, Dryophthorus, Dryophthoroides# [12], Eucalandra, Eugnoristus (anteriorly reduced), Foveolus, Mesocordylus (probably), Metamasius, Myocalandra, Nassophasis, Paramasius, Phacecorynes, Polytus*, Poteriophorus, Rhabdoscelus, Rhynchophorus, Scyphophorus, Sitophilus, Sparganobasis, Sphenophorus, Stenommatus, Temnoschoita, Trigonotarsus#*, Trochorhopalus, Tryphetus, Xerodermus [11]
- b.
- Trident, with prominent, narrow, elongate anterior extension (almost reaching apex of ligula)Sipalinus, Trigonotarsus#*, Yuccaborus
- c.
- TriangularCosmopolites, Polytus*, Rhodobaenus
- d.
- EffacedDiathetes, Nephius (=Anius), OdoiporusNot included: Dynamis, Rhinostomus
4. Discussion
Fifty-two (52) fully illustrated characters of dryophthorine larvae are provided to assist in the identification of this economically important group and difficult to identify life stage. The larvae of some dryophthorine genera, such as Sipalinus, Scyphophorus, and Cosmopolites, are readily recognizable based on a combination of salient characters such as the presence of caudal digitate processes and/or the absence of functional spiracles on the abdomen. This key attempts to provide the user with the freedom to initiate the identification process from any couplet in the key. This identification tool focuses rather heavily on characters of the mouthparts.
This study includes, for the first time, information on the larva of six previously unknown genera of Dryophthorinae: Mesocordylus (probably), Foveolus, Nassophasis, Poteriophorus, Sparganobasis, Eugnoristus, and Tryphetus. In addition, the larva of the once valid genus Paramasius, now treated as a junior synonym of Metamasius, is described for the first time. Data on the larva of Paramasius will be included in ongoing phylogenetic and comparative studies to determine whether synonymy of this genus is supported.
Chaetotaxy of the body, although historically relied upon by authors to segregate the major groups within Dryophthorinae [9], was not used here because of extensive amount of missing data due to rubbing or deterioration of specimens. Furthermore, characters previously used by May [15] and Marvaldi and Morrone [6], such as the number of abdominal superimposed lobes (2, 3, or 4) were not included. Additional features that presented challenges and were not included due to difficulty assessing homology are the presence and location of the posterior accessory sensory pores (pasps) and of the sensory pores (snp).
The current comparative study of dryophthorine larvae is intended to serve as a source of data for ongoing phylogenetic analyses of the subfamily, and preliminary results suggests the presence of significant signal for understanding relationships among higher groups within Dryophthorinae. Zimmerman [21] provided the most comprehensive overview of dryophthorines to date (his Rhynchophoridae) and discussed the placement of the now tribes Stromboscerini and Dryophthirini, which Anderson [9] placed collectively under Stromboscerinae. Grebennikov [22] hypothesized Dryophthorini and Stromboscerini to be sister taxa and suggested the possible exclusion of Nephius from Stromboscerini. Study of known stromboscerine larvae Dryophthoroides, Xerodermus [11,12], and Nephius (=Anius) suggests retention of the tribe in Dryophthorinae and supports its distinction from Dryophthorini, here represented by Stenommatus and Dryophthorus. The retention of Nephius in Stromboscerini remains uncertain. These are preliminary results and a morphological and molecular phylogenetic analysis is currently underway.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Acknowledgments
The addition of the new larvae of dryophthorine genera would not have been possible without the generosity and assistance of Ramesha Barikkad (Kerala University), Beulah Gardner (UKNHM), Chia-Lung Huang (National Taiwan Normal University), Bruno de Madeiros (MCZ), and Rolf Oberprieler (ANIC). Elizabeth Roberts (USDA ARS SEL) completed the majority of the digital illustrations of the body and head and Lucrecia Rodriguez (USDA ARS SEL) generated several habitus images. Their contributions are greatly appreciated. This manuscript benefited greatly from the comments, edits and careful evaluation of three anonymous reviewers; their dedication and time is greatly appreciated. Matt Buffington and Petra Lacayo-Chamorro offered invaluable assistance during the course of this study and their help is greatly appreciated. The USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA.
Conflicts of Interest
The author declares no conflict of interest.
References
- Oberprieler, R.G.; Marvaldi, A.E.; Anderson, R.S. Weevils, weevils, weevils everywhere. Zootaxa 2007, 1668, 491–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Anderson, R.S.; Marvaldi, A.E. 3.7.3 Dryophthorinae Schoenherr, 1825. In Handbook of Zoology. Arthropoda: Insecta: Coleoptera; Leschen, R.A.B., Beutel, R.G., Eds.; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; München, Germany; Boston, MA, USA, 2014; pp. 477–483. [Google Scholar]
- Alonso-Zarazaga, M.A.; Lyal, C.H.C. A World Catalogue of Families and Genera of Curculionoidea (Insecta: Coleoptera) (Excepting Scolytidae and Platypodidae); Entomopraxis: Barcelona, Spain, 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Kuschel, G. A phylogenetic classification of Curculionoidea to families and subfamilies. Mem. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 1995, 14, 5–33. [Google Scholar]
- Thompson, R.T. Observations on the morphology and classification of weevils (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea) with a key to major groups. J. Nat. Hist. 1992, 26, 835–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marvaldi, A.E.; Morrone, J.J. Phylogenetic systematics of weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionoidea): A reappraisal based on larval and adult morphology. Insect Syst. Evol. 2000, 31, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- McKenna, D.D.; Sequeira, A.S.; Marvaldi, A.E.; Farrell, B.D. Temporal lags and overlap in the diversification of weevils and flowering plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 7083–7088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chamorro, M.L.; Huang, C.L. First description of the Immature Stages of Poteriophorus Schoenherr: The larva, pupa and biology of P. uhlemanni (Curculionidae: Dryophthorinae) discovered through Dawu Traditional Ecological Knowledge. Coleopt. Bull. 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Anderson, W.H. Larvae of Some Genera of Calendrinae (=Rhynchophorinae) and Stromboscerinae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1948, 41, 413–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- May, B.M. An Introduction to the Immature Stages of Australian Curculionoidea. In Australian Weevils; Csiro Publishing: Melbourne, Australia, 1994; Volume II, pp. 365–728. [Google Scholar]
- Gardner, C.M. Immature stages of Indian Coleoptera (14) (Curculionidae). Indian For. Rec. (Entomol. Ser.) 1934, 20, 1–48, Plates I–VI. [Google Scholar]
- Gardner, J.C.M. Immature stages of Indian Coleoptera (24, Curculionidae contd.). Indian For. Rec. (New Ser.) Entomol. 1938, 3, 227–260, Plates I–V. [Google Scholar]
- Wattanapongsiri, A. A Revision of the Genera Rhynchophorus and Dynamis (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Ph.D. Thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA, 1966; p. 418. [Google Scholar]
- Chamorro, M.L.; Volkovitsh, M.G.; Poland, T.M.; Haack, R.A.; Lingafelter, S.W. Preimaginal Stages of the Emerald Ash Borer, Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire (Coleoptera: Buprestidae): An Invasive Pest on Ash Trees (Fraxinus). PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- May, B.M. Larvae of Curculionoidea (Insecta: Coleoptera): A systematic overview. Fauna N. Z. 1993, 28, 226p. [Google Scholar]
- Oberprieler, R.G.; Anderson, R.S.; Marvaldi, A.E. 3 Curculionoidea Latreille, 1802: Introduction, Phylogeny. In Handbook of Zoology. Arthropoda: Insecta: Coleoptera; Leschen, R.A.B., Beutel, R.G., Eds.; De Gruyter: Berlin, Germany; München, Germany; Boston, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 285–300. [Google Scholar]
- Chamorro, M.L.; Persson, J.; Torres-Santana, C.W.; Keularts, J.; Scheffer, S.J.; Lewis, M.L. Molecular and Morphological Tools to Distinguish Scyphophorus acupunctatus Gyllenhal, 1838 (Curculionidae: Dryophthorinae): A New Weevil Pest of the Endangered Century Plant, Agave eggersiana from St. Croix, U.S. Virgin Islands. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 2016, 118, 218–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jonhnson, N.F. Future taxonomy today: New tools applied to accelerate the taxonomic process. In Systema Naturae 250: The Linnaean Ark; Polaszek, A., Ed.; CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group: London, UK, 2010; pp. 137–147. [Google Scholar]
- Holloway, B.A. Anthribidae (Insecta: Coleoptera). Fauna N. Z. 1982, 3, 272p. [Google Scholar]
- Marshall, C.J. Two new species of rain beetle (Coleoptera: Pleocomidae: Pleocoma LeConte, 1856) in the Pacific Northwest of the United States of America. Zootaxa 2018, 4471, 387–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zimmerman, E. Australian Weevils. Volume III. Nanophyidae, Rhynchophoridae, Erirhinidae, Curculionidae: Amycterinae, Literature Consulted; CSIRO Publications: Melbourne, Australia, 1993; 854p. [Google Scholar]
- Grebennikov, V.V. Dryophthorinae weevils (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) of the forest floor in Southeast Asia: Illustrated overview of nominal Stromboscerini genera. Zootaxa 2018, 4418, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
This article is published under the terms of the free Open Government Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/open-government-licence.htm.