Next Article in Journal
MTHFR and MTRR Polymorphisms Predict Sex-Dependent Psychotic Symptom Improvements, Not Metabolic Changes
Previous Article in Journal
Bridging Molecular and Bulk Nonlinearities: Kerr Effect Phenomena in Transparent Ceramic Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
Metabolic and Inflammatory Adipokine Profiles in PCOS: A Focus on Adiposity, Insulin Resistance, and Atherogenic Risk
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

From Genes to Lives: Integrating the Complexities of Primary Ovarian Insufficiency

by
Rand Abujaber
1,†,
Charnae Henry-Smith
2,† and
Sudha Sharma
1,3,*
1
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, College of Medicine, Howard University, 520 W Street, NW, Washington, DC 20059, USA
2
Department of Biology, College of Arts and Sciences, Howard University, 415 College Street, NW, Washington, DC 20059, USA
3
National Human Genome Center, College of Medicine, Howard University, 520 W Street, NW, Washington, DC 20059, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(3), 1353; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27031353
Submission received: 4 December 2025 / Revised: 20 January 2026 / Accepted: 28 January 2026 / Published: 29 January 2026

Abstract

Primary ovarian insufficiency (POI) affects up to 3% of reproductive-aged women and is a critical yet underrecognized contributor to infertility and systemic accelerated aging. While most cases remain idiopathic, advances in genomics increasingly reveal a genetic basis, implicating pathways that govern DNA repair, meiosis, chromosomal stability, and folliculogenesis. This review synthesizes the multifactorial etiology of POI, integrating genetic contributions with emerging evidence on epigenetic dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and environmental influences such as toxins and lifestyle factors. These mechanisms converge on core cellular processes, driving premature follicular depletion and shortening reproductive lifespan. We also highlight racial and ethnic disparities in POI prevalence and research representation, alongside the profound psychosocial burden experienced by affected individuals. Addressing these challenges through integrative strategies that unite mechanistic insight with equity is essential, not only for improving POI care but also for advancing precision approaches to ovarian aging and safeguarding reproductive health across the lifespan.

1. Introduction

Aging is a gradual, inevitable process that affects all organ systems, including the reproductive axis in women. This physiological decline in follicle number and quality culminates in menopause, a universal midlife milestone defined by the permanent cessation of menstrual cycles, typically occurring around age 50, with an average onset at 51 [1]. In contrast, Primary Ovarian Insufficiency (POI) represents a pathological, premature transition, often before age 40, leading to early ovarian failure and hormonal disruption. POI affects approximately 1 in 100 women by age 40 and 1 in 1000 by age 30 [2,3,4,5,6], with consequences for fertility and overall health. Seminal work by Ruth et al. (2021) has highlighted that the genetic architecture of reproductive aging often overlaps with that of POI, suggesting a shared biological continuum between natural menopause and pathological ovarian failure [7].
POI, also known as premature ovarian failure (POF), presents with a range of clinical phenotypes often characterized by the absence or disruption of menstruation (primary or secondary amenorrhea), increased gonadotropin levels, and low estradiol levels [3,8,9]. Primary amenorrhea is defined as the failure to begin menstruation by the age of 14, along with the absence of secondary sexual characteristics, or the failure to menstruate by age 16, regardless of sexual development [10]. Secondary amenorrhea refers to the cessation of menstruation for more than 3 months in a woman with previously regular periods or for more than 6 months in a woman with irregular cycles [11]. Additional symptoms of POI include fatigue, anxiety or depression, hot flashes, sleep disturbances, and decreased libido [12]. Early ovarian failure often leads to infertility, though spontaneous pregnancy has been reported to occur in 5–10% of cases [13,14].
Diagnosis of POI is often delayed, as symptoms are frequently mistaken for other diseases or overlooked [11,15,16]. Diagnostic criteria include menstrual irregularities before age 40 and abnormal hormone levels. According to international consensus, including guidelines from the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), diagnosis is supported by follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels exceeding 25 IU/L, which is below the previously suggested threshold of >40 IU/L, on two occasions at least 4 weeks apart [17,18]. Further tests may include karyotyping and FMR1 gene testing, screening for autoimmune conditions, physical exams to evaluate the presence and development of secondary sex characteristics, and pelvic ultrasounds to assess ovarian health, follicle counts, and endometrial thickness. Given the strong association with autoimmune disease, screening for thyroid (TSH, TPO-Ab) and adrenal (21-hydroxylase Ab) autoimmunity is also recommended [3,17,18,19,20].
Management of POI primarily centers on hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and fertility interventions [17,21]. HRT typically involves the administration of estrogen, progesterone, and androgens to alleviate hypoestrogenic symptoms and reduce long-term risks such as osteoporosis and cardiovascular disease [3,17,21]. Menopausal hormone therapy may help mitigate accelerated biological aging associated with POI, underscoring the systemic protective benefits of hormone therapy [22,23]. However, it does not restore ovarian function. For patients seeking pregnancy, oocyte donation remains the most effective option, while cryopreservation offers fertility preservation for those at risk of POI [24]. Promising approaches, such as stem cell therapies, in vitro activation, mitochondrial activation, and platelet-rich plasma infusion, are being explored for their potential to rejuvenate ovarian tissue and improve reproductive outcomes [3,24,25,26,27,28,29]. These innovations represent a shift toward restoring ovarian function rather than solely managing its loss.
This review synthesizes the multifactorial etiology of POI, integrating known genetic contributions with emerging evidence on epigenetic dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and environmental influences. We prioritized studies identifying causative germline variants, validated animal models, and recent large-scale cohorts to provide an up-to-date narrative on the biological and societal complexities of POI.

2. Biological Context: Oogenesis and Physiological Ovarian Decline

Understanding POI requires a foundational grasp of the ovary’s developmental and aging trajectory [1,30,31,32,33,34]. Oogenesis begins in utero when primordial germ cells (PGCs), specified in the epiblast, migrate to the gonadal ridges around embryonic weeks 5–6. This migration is accompanied by extensive proliferation. Upon reaching the gonads, PGCs differentiate into oogonia, which enter meiosis I and arrest at the diplotene stage of prophase I, a state they may remain in for decades. Each arrested oocyte becomes encapsulated by pre-granulosa cells, forming a primordial follicle. This marks the onset of folliculogenesis, the process by which follicles mature through primary, secondary, and antral stages. This critical developmental window is orchestrated by a precise interplay of genetic networks and epigenetic programming, establishing the oocyte’s competency and long-term survival [32,35].
The ovarian reserve peaks at approximately 6–7 million oocytes around 20 weeks of gestation, followed by a dramatic wave of apoptosis, leaving about 1 million oocytes at birth. By puberty, only 300,000 remain. This decline continues steadily; by age 30, roughly 100,000 oocytes persist, and by age 40, the number drops to 10,000. Menopause typically ensues when fewer than 1000 follicles remain [36].
This age-related attrition reflects a qualitative deterioration driven by molecular changes such as telomere shortening and reduced expression of DNA repair genes and cohesin loss, all of which impair chromosomal segregation [37,38]. These changes compromise oocyte integrity and mirror the molecular signatures observed in POI [32,36], suggesting that POI represents an accelerated form of physiological ovarian aging.
Throughout oogenesis, quality control mechanisms, including DNA damage checkpoints (ATM/ATR) and apoptotic pathways, maintain genomic fidelity and eliminate damaged or aneuploid oocytes [32,35,36]. The tightly regulated progression from embryonic germ cell specification to age-related follicular depletion underscores ovarian aging as a continuous physiological process [37] and supports the view that POI is a premature manifestation rather than a distinct pathology.
Consistent with this model, a 2025 study by Zhou et al., analyzing over 229,000 women from the UK Biobank and NHANES, provided the first large-scale evidence linking POI to accelerated biological aging [22].

3. Non-Genetic and Environmental Etiologies

POI is a multifactorial condition with diverse etiologies [3,15,24,28,39]. While genetic causes are increasingly identified, a majority of POI cases remain idiopathic or are attributed to environmental, iatrogenic, or metabolic insults (Figure 1). Understanding these non-genetic contributors is essential for identifying modifiable risk factors.

3.1. Environmental, Iatrogenic, and Lifestyle Factors

Non-genetic causes of POI include iatrogenic factors, such as ovarian surgeries, chemotherapy, and radiation [40]. These gonadotoxic treatments directly impair ovarian reserve; for example, alkylating agents like cyclophosphamide work by inducing double-strand breaks (DSBs) and apoptosis in oocytes [41].
Environmental exposures, including cigarette smoke [6], pesticides [42], and endocrine disruptors like bisphenol A (BPA) [43], have also been implicated in POI and accelerating ovarian aging. These agents often act by promoting oxidative stress pathways, impairing DNA repair gene expression, and disrupting granulosa cell function, which accelerates follicular atresia [40,41]. A meta-analysis of 38 studies identified modifiable risk factors such as chemical exposure, smoking, sleep deprivation, and psychological stress [39]. Occupational exposures, including hair dye chemicals, were associated with a fivefold increase in POI risk, underscoring the need for environmental health surveillance in reproductive-age women [39].
Dietary and lifestyle influences play a significant, albeit often underappreciated, role in ovarian health [44]. Obesity and low BMI exacerbate oxidative stress and inflammation, creating a hostile microenvironment for follicular development, while diets rich in omega-3 fatty acids and antioxidants (melatonin, CoQ10) may offer protective effects by neutralizing reactive oxygen species (ROS) and supporting mitochondrial function [44]. Emerging evidence also implicates gut microbiota dysbiosis in hormonal disruption, ovarian aging, and POI [45]. Collectively, these factors suggest that lifestyle modifications could serve as an adjuvant strategy for preserving ovarian function.
Metabolic disorders and autoimmune diseases (e.g., Addison’s disease, thyroiditis) contribute to POI through systemic inflammation and immune-mediated ovarian damage [3,15,22,46,47,48,49]. Autoimmune etiologies alone account for approximately 20–30% of cases, highlighting the overlap between systemic immunity and reproductive longevity [50].

3.2. Mitochondrial Dysfunction

Mitochondrial integrity is central to oocyte quality and survival. Many environmental and metabolic insults compromise mitochondrial integrity via excessive ROS production [23,49]. Mitochondrial dysfunction amplifies ROS generation, creating a vicious cycle that impairs ATP synthesis, steroidogenesis, and oocyte quality [51]. Recent evidence links mitochondrial biogenesis defects, fusion-fission imbalance, and mitochondrial DNA mutations to POI pathogenesis, thereby disrupting energy metabolism and calcium homeostasis, which are critical for follicular development [51,52,53]. Thus, mitochondrial dysfunction is emerging as a central mechanism in ovarian aging and POI, bridging the gap between environmental insults and cellular senescence [3,54,55].

4. Genetic Basis of POI

4.1. General Principles of POI Genetics

Genetic factors contribute significantly to the etiology of POI, accounting for approximately 25% of cases, with both X-linked and autosomal genes implicated [2,3,28,56,57,58]. These genes regulate essential molecular processes, including DNA repair, meiosis, folliculogenesis, and oocyte maturation, all of which are critical for maintaining ovarian function throughout the reproductive lifespan. The prolonged arrest of oocytes in prophase I makes them especially reliant on these pathways [34], highlighting the vulnerability of the ovarian reserve to genetic disruption. Importantly, the variants associated with POI are predominantly constitutional (germline) mutations, present in all somatic and germ cells, rather than somatic mutations typical of neoplastic processes.
The genetic architecture of POI is heterogeneous, ranging from macroscopic chromosomal abnormalities to single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and copy number variations (CNVs). Chromosomal defects [56,59], such as Turner syndrome (monosomy X) [60] and X-autosome translocations [61], have historically accounted for a significant portion (approximately 10–13%) of diagnosed POI cases [3,39,62], primarily by disrupting the “critical region” on the X chromosome (Xq13-q26) necessary for ovarian maintenance.

4.2. Known Genetic Contributors to POI

Advances in high-throughput sequencing have revealed a rapidly expanding set of autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X-linked genes implicated in POI, highlighting an increasingly complex genetic landscape. Hundreds of candidates continue to emerge as sequencing cohorts expand. In this review, we focus on major functional pathways and representative gene defects, directing readers to comprehensive catalogs in recent genetic reviews such as Nie et al. [63]. Below, we summarize key genetic contributors organized by biological function, with Table 1 providing a non-exhaustive overview of genes implicated in POI.
a. DNA Repair and Genome Integrity: Oocytes arrested in prophase I are particularly reliant on robust DNA repair mechanisms to maintain genomic fidelity over decades [64]. Mutations in genes central to homologous recombination (HR), the primary pathway for repairing meiotic DSBs, are strongly associated with POI [65,66]. Key genes in this pathway include BRCA2, where compound heterozygous mutations impair HR, leading to oocyte apoptosis and gonadal dysgenesis, and FANCA and FANCM, which are critical for DNA damage repair and genomic stability during oogenesis [67,68,69,70,71]. Mutations in DMC1 disrupt the repair of meiotic DSBs [72,73], while defects in mismatch repair (MMR) genes like MSH5 (e.g., p.D486Y mutation) and MSH4 (e.g., c.2355+1G>A mutation) impair meiotic crossover formation, leading to meiotic arrest at prophase I and oocyte depletion [74,75]. Genes involved in non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) also contribute to genomic instability when mutated [66,76]. The transcription factor TP63 also plays a pivotal role in safeguarding oocyte genome integrity; gain-of-function mutations in TP63 induce oocyte apoptosis and accelerate oocyte depletion [77].
b. Meiotic Regulation and Chromosomal Stability: Proper chromosomal segregation during meiosis depends on the cohesin complex and synaptonemal complex formation [78]. Mutations in genes encoding these components, such as STAG3 (sister chromatid cohesion) and SYCE1 (synaptonemal complex), disrupt chromosome pairing and are linked to ovarian atrophy and primary amenorrhea [79,80,81]. Similarly, mutations in HFM1 and MEIOB, which impair single-strand DNA binding during DSB repair, result in incomplete meiotic recombination and oocyte loss [82,83,84]. Other meiotic regulators like SHOC1, KASH5, and MCMDC2 have also been implicated in disrupting meiotic efficiency [57,65,72].
c. Folliculogenesis, Oocyte Maturation, and Signaling: A large network of genes regulates the development of the follicle and oocyte, including many previously classified as “non-syndromic” causes of POI [85,86]. Early establishment and maintenance of the primordial follicle pool depend on transcription factors essential for gonadal development and follicle specification, such as FIGLA, NOBOX, LHX8, and NR5A1 [87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94]. Disruption of these factors compromises folliculogenesis at its earliest stages.
Follicle activation and survival are further regulated by signaling pathways and cell-intrinsic factors. Mutations in GPR3, WT1, FOXO3α, and SOHLH1 lead to premature follicular activation, apoptosis, and impaired granulosa cell development [95,96,97,98]. Components of the Wnt signaling pathway, including LRP5 and LGR4, are similarly critical for ovarian development, with pathogenic variants associated not only with POI but also with systemic phenotypes such as osteoporosis [99].
Gonadotropin responsiveness represents a key checkpoint in follicle recruitment and growth. FSHR mutations (e.g., p.A189V) are a well-known cause of follicular recruitment failure and often exhibit ethnic associations [100,101,102,103,104]. Proper follicle growth also depends on bidirectional communication between the oocyte and surrounding granulosa cells, mediated by oocyte-derived growth factors such as GDF9 and the X-linked BMP15, which are indispensable for granulosa cell function and coordination [105,106,107,108,109,110].
As follicles progress, oocyte maturation and specialization rely on genes responsible for structural integrity and germ cell identity. ZAR1, ZP3 (critical for zona pellucida formation), and PRDM1 (a regulator of primordial germ cell development) are essential at this stage [57,111]. Germ cell survival further depends on transcriptional regulators such as POF1B, DACH2, SOHLH2, and SALL4 [89,112]. Finally, underscoring the complexity of transcriptional control during meiosis, heterozygous loss-of-function variants in MGA, a key regulator of meiotic gene expression, have been linked to reduced ovarian reserve [113].
d. Syndromic Genes: In these cases, POI is one feature of a multi-system disorder. Key examples include FOXL2 (linked to Blepharophimosis-Ptosis-Epicanthus Inversus Syndrome (BPES) Type II), GALT (associated with galactosemia), AIRE (part of autoimmune polyglandular syndrome), POLG (linked to mitochondrial repair deficits), and PMM2 (disrupting glycosylation) [114,115,116,117,118,119,120]. The FMR1 premutation (55-200 CGG repeats), associated with Fragile X syndrome, is the most common single-gene cause and is found in 0.8–7.5% of sporadic cases and up to 13% of familial POI [117,121,122], highlighting its relevance in genetic screening.
e. New Risk and Candidate Genes: Large-scale sequencing efforts continue to identify novel POI candidate genes [57,58,123]. These include genes involved in fundamental cellular processes such as protein regulation (USP36, NPM2, VCP), mRNA processing (WDR33, EIF4ENIF1), germline integrity (PIWIL3), and transcriptional regulation (POLR2C, POLR2E, POLR2H).
f. Androgen Metabolism: Beyond the well-characterized DNA repair and meiotic genes, androgen metabolism pathways also contribute to POI risk. Polymorphisms in genes regulating androgen metabolism, such as SULT2A1, CYP19A1, SRD5A2, and AR, that influence DHEA conversion to testosterone, a process essential for early folliculogenesis [124]. Extended CAG repeats in the AR gene reduce receptor activity and are associated with diminished ovarian reserve [125]. These findings highlight the importance of integrating hormonal and metabolic profiling into genetic screening strategies for POI.
Table 1. Key Genes Implicated in Primary Ovarian Insufficiency.
Table 1. Key Genes Implicated in Primary Ovarian Insufficiency.
CategoryGeneFunction/PathwayKey Findings and Phenotypes
a. DNA Repair and Genome IntegrityDMC1Meiotic DSB repair, HRMissense mutations associated with POI [73]. One study found over 50% of its sub-Saharan African cohort had a variant, suggesting a potential biomarker in Black populations [126].
BRCA2HR, RAD51 recruitmentCompound heterozygous mutations caused primary amenorrhea, short stature, and gonad dysgenesis [69].
FANCAFA pathway, DNA
repair, meiosis
Mutations implicated in sporadic POI [67]. Heterozygous mice had reduced fertility and smaller ovaries [71].
FANCMDNA damage repair (HR)Homozygous mutation identified in familial POI cases. Defective repair can lead to accelerated follicle depletion [127].
MSH5Mismatch repair (MMR), HRHomozygous missense mutations (p.D487Y) in a Han Chinese family led to amenorrhea and atrophic ovaries. The mouse model showed meiosis arrest [74].
MSH4Meiotic recombinationRare cause of POI. A specific mutation (c.2355+1G>A) may alter the protein, preventing it from binding MSH5 [68,75].
CSB-PGBD3Transcription-coupled DNA repairMutations associated with POI impaired DNA damage repair and affected ovarian development [128].
TP63Transcription factor, safeguards germline genome integrityHeterozygous variants (0.78% of POI cases) disrupt autoinhibition, leading to activation of proapoptotic genes and oocyte depletion [77].
b. Meiotic RegulationSTAG3Cohesin complex, sister chromatid pairingVariants associated with primary amenorrhea underdeveloped breasts [81,129]. Deficient mice had fibrotic ovaries with no follicles [81].
SYCE1Synaptonemal complex componentDeficient mice are infertile [79]. A homozygous missense mutation was found in affected sisters in a Middle Eastern family [80].
HFM1ATP-dependent DNA helicase, HRVariants observed in 2% of POI patients [130]. Missense mutations linked to splicing abnormalities affecting oocyte development [82,130,131].
MEIOBSingle-strand DNA binding during meiotic DSB repairHomozygous variant led to protein truncation [84]. An estimated 1 in 11,000 women with POI have a variant [84]. Knockout mice lacked oocytes [132].
MCMDC2Homolog alignment, crossover formationVariants disrupt functional domains and reduce HR efficiency, contributing to POI [57].
SPIDRDNA damage repair (interacts with BLM)A novel heterozygous deletion (p. IIe616_Asp618del) potentially disrupts DNA repair [57,133].
SLX4, SHOC1, RFWD3, NUP43, MEIOSIN, KASH5, CPEB1Meiotic initiation, homologous pairing, and HRAnimal models show infertility, ovarian atrophy, and meiotic arrest [57,65,112]. SHOC1 and KASH5 variants also linked to male non-obstructive azoospermia [134,135].
c. Folliculogenesis and SignalingFSHRFSH signaling, follicle growthFirst gene linked to non-syndromic POI [103]. rs6166 polymorphism linked to POI in Asian populations [104]; p.A189V mutation in Finnish cohort [103].
GDF9Follicular development, granulosa cell maturationHeterozygous transversion (S186Y) found in a Caucasian woman with atrophic ovaries [107]. A homozygous truncating variant (c.604C>T; p.(Gln202Ter) also reported [110].
BMP15Oocyte-specific, granulosa cell growthVariants reduce synergy with GDF9, leading to poor oocyte quality [105,107]. Homozygous mutations linked to folliculogenesis failure [136].
FIGLAGerm-cell-specific transcription factorHeterozygous deletions linked to smaller uteruses and atrophic ovaries [87,88].
NOBOXTranscription factor, ovarian developmentFirst autosomal gene linked to POI [91]; 42% of patients with a NOBOX variant were of sub-Saharan African descent [126].
LHX8Germ-cell-specific transcription factorDeficiency in mice disrupted oocyte-specific gene expression [92]. A rare variant (p.Ala444Thr) found in POI patient [126].
NR5A1Transcriptional regulator, gonadal developmentMutations identified in POI patients [57,137] and other disorders of sex development [138].
FOXO3αRegulates ovarian oocytes, follicular developmentDecreased mRNA expression seen in POI ovarian tissues [139]. Phosphorylation may reactivate primordial follicles [140].
ZAR1Folliculogenesis, oocyte maturationSeven LoF variants identified, disrupting the conserved C-terminal ZNF domain [57]. ZAR1 expression is negatively correlated with FSH levels in women with POI [141].
d. Syndromic GenesFMR1Encodes Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein (FMRP)The first single-gene cause of premature ovarian failure [142,143,144]. Premutation (55–200 CGG repeats) associated with syndromic POI [121,145]. ~15% of premutation carriers develop POI [145].
FOXL2Transcription factor, ovarian developmentFirst autosomal gene implicated in syndromic POI [146]. Mutations linked to Blepharophimosis/Ptosis/Epicanthus Inversus Syndrome (BPES) Type I, which presents with POI [147].
GALTGalactose processingMutations cause galactosemia; women frequently exhibit small ovaries and reduced follicle count GALT [115,148].
AIREAutoimmune regulator, immune toleranceMutations linked to autoimmune polyglandular syndromes (APS) and hypogonadism [47,149].
POLGMitochondrial DNA replication/repairMutations linked to mtDNA depletion and ovarian insufficiency in syndromic cases [118,150].
PMM2GlycosylationBiallelic mutation can cause POI as part of PMM2-congenital disorder of glycosylation (PMM2-CDG) [119]; mutations reduce enzymatic activity, affecting oogenesis [112,120].
e. Androgen
Metabolism
ARAndrogen ReceptorExtended CAG repeats reduce receptor activity and are associated with diminished ovarian reserve [125].
SULT2A1DHEA sulfationPolymorphisms impair DHEA metabolism, common in African American women [124].
f. New Risk Genes (Various Functions)USP36Deubiquitinase, rRNA processingA rare variant linked to POI and knockdown in Drosophila resulted in atrophic ovaries [123].
POLR2CRNA Polymerase II SubunitNonsense mutation in a family with dominant inheritance caused reduced mRNA levels, impairing germ cell proliferation [151].
WDR33mRNA processing (polyadenylation)Highly expressed in oocytes; knockdown in Drosophila revealed atrophic ovaries [123].
PIWIL3Germline integrity, suppresses transposable elementsExpressed in oocytes; variants disrupting the PIWI domain linked to ovarian insufficiency [123].
NPM2Oocyte maturation, embryonic developmentVariant linked to POI risk [123]. Highly expressed in oocytes; knockout models are infertile [152].
VCPATPase, germinal vesicle breakdownMissense mutations associated with POI and ovarian atrophy [123].
EIF4ENIF1Translational regulationDominant-inherited heterozygous EIF4ENIF1 mutations in some POI cases [153,154]. Haploinsufficiency impairs fertility in the mouse model [155]

4.3. Epigenetic Regulation in POI

Epigenetic mechanisms, including DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs, play a critical role in ovarian development, folliculogenesis, and reproductive aging [156]. Unlike genetic mutations, epigenetic changes alter gene expression without modifying the DNA sequence [157], offering dynamic and reversible control. In POI, these changes disrupt granulosa cell function, oocyte maturation, and follicular survival [158]. Specifically, epigenetic reprogramming during oogenesis involves genome-wide demethylation followed by de novo methylation to establish maternal imprints, a process essential for oocyte competence that is susceptible to disruption by environmental and genetic factors [159].
a. DNA Methylation and Oocyte Senescence: DNA methylation is the most extensively studied epigenetic mechanism in female reproductive aging [160]. Aberrant methylation patterns have been identified in both granulosa cells and oocytes from women with diminished ovarian reserve, a known precursor to POI [161]. These alterations disrupt gene regulatory networks essential for follicular development, hormone responsiveness, and oocyte competence.
Several genes critical to reproductive function are particularly sensitive to methylation changes [162,163,164]. For instance, proper methylation of HOXA10 [165,166] and the progesterone receptor (PGR) [167,168] is required for endometrial receptivity and oocyte competency, and aberrant methylation at these loci has been significantly linked to implantation failure. Similarly, hypermethylation of the ESR1 promoter can silence estrogen receptor expression, mimicking the hypoestrogenic state of POI [163,169]. Furthermore, altered methylation and expression of MEG3, a maternally expressed imprinted lncRNA, regulates oxidative stress and apoptosis in granulosa cells, directly impacting follicular reserve [158,170]. In addition, hypermethylation of CpG islands in genes such as AMH and IGF2 suppresses hormone production and impairs oocyte development [164].
Notably, age-related methylation changes are increasingly recognized as determinants of oocyte quality and reproductive potential [162]. Experimental studies in mice demonstrate that aging alters DNMT1 and DNMT3a/b expression, leading to hypermethylation and impaired gene activation, while hypomethylation in regions like the P73 promoter correlates with oocyte senescence [158], underscoring the dual and context-dependent role of methylation dynamics in ovarian aging
b. Histone Modifications and Chromatin Remodeling: Histone modifications, including acetylation, methylation, and phosphorylation, play a central role in regulating chromatin accessibility and gene transcription [171]. In POI, reduced levels of the activating histone marks H3K27ac and H3K4me3 have been observed in lymphoblastoid cell lines derived from patients with X-autosome translocations, indicating a global disruption of chromatin regulation [5]. Notably, these epigenetic alterations extend beyond chromosomal breakpoints, supporting the “position effect” hypothesis whereby chromosomal rearrangements perturb higher-order nuclear architecture and regulatory landscapes [5]. In animal models, HDAC6 regulates primordial follicle activation through mTOR signaling, with HDAC6 overexpression extending reproductive lifespan in mice [172]. In contrast, increased H4K12 and H4K16 acetylation in aged oocytes correlates with chromatin relaxation, compromised chromosomal integrity, and meiotic defects, highlighting histone acetylation as a key regulator of higher-order chromatin organization and meiotic fidelity, rather than gene expression alone [158,173,174].
c. Non-Coding RNAs and Follicular Atresia: Non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs)are emerging as key regulators of ovarian function and follicular fate [162,175,176]. In POI, dysregulated microRNAs (miRNAs), including miR-23a, miR-146a, and miR-181a, promote granulosa cell apoptosis by targeting anti-apoptotic pathways and DNA repair mechanisms [177]. In addition, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been increasingly implicated in POI pathogenesis [176,178,179]. LncRNAs such as NEAT1, HOTAIR, and BBOX1-AS1 modulate granulosa cell survival by interacting with miRNAs or directly regulating transcription factors involved in hormone synthesis, cell-cycle control, and apoptotic signaling [158,179]. For instance, NEAT1 downregulation increases p53-mediated apoptosis in granulosa cells [180], whereas HOTAIR overexpression restores Notch-1 signaling and mitigates cell death [181]. These findings highlight the coordinated role of lncRNA-miRNA regulatory networks in follicular atresia.
Beyond miRNAs and lncRNAs, other classes of ncRNAs are emerging as vital regulators of POI [182,183]. PIWI-interacting RNAs (piRNAs) are essential for maintaining germline genome integrity by silencing transposable elements [184] and are implicated in POI pathogenesis [185]. Additionally, small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs) and small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs) participate in RNA splicing and modification critical for oocyte maturation [186]. Recent analyses also highlight the role of tRNA-derived small RNAs (tsRNAs) [187] and rRNA-derived small RNAs (rsRNAs) [188] in transmitting metabolic information, suggesting their dysregulation may contribute to POI risk [182,189]
d. Environmental and Transgenerational Epigenetic Effects: Environmental pollutants, including BPA, phthalates, and ionizing radiation, induce epigenetic alterations that impair ovarian function by modifying DNA methylation patterns, histone marks, and ncRNA profiles [163]. These changes disrupt steroidogenesis, compromise granulosa cell function, and ultimately reduce ovarian reserve [24,28,42,43,158,190,191]. In parallel, environmental exposures and chemotherapeutic agents further alter miRNA expression, exacerbating granulosa cell loss and accelerating follicular depletion [158,191,192]. Importantly, transgenerational inheritance of environmentally induced epigenetic alterations has been documented, suggesting ancestral exposures can predispose subsequent generations to POI through heritable disruptions of gene regulatory networks critical for ovarian function [158,190,193,194].

4.4. Genotype-Phenotype Correlations

Genetic mutations in POI are increasingly recognized to correlate with the clinical presentation of amenorrhea [57,112]. For example, FSHR mutations are predominantly associated with primary amenorrhea [195], reflecting early disruption in follicular recruitment. In contrast, mutations in AIRE, BLM, and SPIDR have been found in secondary amenorrhea cases, suggesting a later-onset ovarian dysfunction [7,63]. Other genes, including HFM1, MSH4, and POLG, span both subtypes, indicating variable expressivity and penetrance [57,196]. These genotype-phenotype distinctions offer valuable insights into disease mechanisms and hold promise for personalized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies [2,3,57].

5. Racial and Ethnic Susceptibility in POI

Genetic variants associated with POI differ across racial and ethnic groups, yet most populations remain underrepresented in genomic research. This underrepresentation constrains understanding of differential susceptibility and impedes the development of equitable diagnostic, preventative, and therapeutic strategies.
Ethnic differences in ovarian reserve are well documented across the lifespan. For example, Indian women exhibit ovarian reserve markers comparable to those of Spanish women six years older [197], suggesting underlying genetic or environmental influences on ovarian aging trajectories. African women tend to demonstrate higher ovarian reserve during early reproductive years but experience more rapid age-related declines, whereas Asian women typically show slower declines despite lower baseline reserve levels [198,199,200]. Collectively, these findings indicate that both the timing and rate of ovarian aging vary substantially across populations.
Environmental and lifestyle factors also contribute to racial disparities in POI risk. For example, vitamin D deficiency, more prevalent among African American women due to reduced sunlight exposure, and smoking are both associated with diminished ovarian reserve and accelerated follicular loss [201,202]. These exposures may interact with genetic susceptibility to compound the risk of POI in affected populations.
Systemic and structural barriers also significantly influence POI diagnosis and management. High costs of infertility care, limited insurance coverage, cultural stigma, and healthcare access disparities disproportionately affect minority women, shaping illness perception, help-seeking behaviors, and treatment utilization [203,204]. Stigma surrounding infertility is particularly pronounced among Asian American women, especially those of Chinese descent [205,206,207]. Hispanic, Asian, and Black women express significantly greater concern about others discovering their infertility compared to White women [205]. Specifically, Black women report heightened fears of personal failure and disappointing partners [205], while many Latina women view childlessness as a marital failure [208]. These psychosocial stressors can delay diagnosis and hinder treatment engagement, and are further compounded by language, immigration status, and communication barriers that disproportionately affect non-citizens and recent immigrants [209].
Disparities extend into clinical outcomes, particularly with assisted reproductive technologies (ART) [210,211]. Black, Hispanic, and Asian women experience significantly lower live birth rates compared to White women, with Black women showing the poorest outcomes despite comparable embryo quality and treatment protocols [203,204]. These findings underscore systemic inequities in reproductive care delivery and outcomes rather than biological differences alone.
Genetic predispositions contributing to POI also vary by race and ethnicity. Multiple gene variants affecting ovarian reserve and follicular maintenance have been implicated in population-level differences in POI susceptibility [2,112,212]. The Study of Women Across the Nation reported a POI prevalence of 1.1% among women aged 40–55 years overall; prevalence in Chinese and Japanese women (0.5%) was markedly lower than in Caucasian (1.0%), African American (1.4%), and Hispanic women (1.4%), supporting population-specific genetic and epigenetic influences [213].
Further evidence of ethnic variation in ovarian reserve comes from hormonal biomarker studies. A 2009 study by Seifer et al. demonstrated that Anti Müllerian Hormone (AMH) levels were 25.2% lower in Black women and 24.6% lower in Hispanic women compared with White women among HIV infected cohorts [200]. Subsequent studies confirmed persistently lower AMH levels in Black and Hispanic women, even after adjustment for body mass index, smoking status, and age, suggesting intrinsic biological differences in ovarian reserve dynamics [198]. These disparities are further compounded by historical inequities, cultural mistrust of the medical system, and patterns of “stratified re-production” that continue to constrain reproductive autonomy among minority populations [203,204].
Ethnic disparities in androgen metabolism may also contribute to differential POI risk. African American women exhibit higher frequencies of polymorphisms in SULT2A1, which impair DHEA metabolism, as well as elevated SHBG levels that reduce bioavailable testosterone [124]. Together, these metabolic differences may influence follicular survival and ovarian aging trajectories. Collectively, these findings underscore the need to refine diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to account for genetic, metabolic, environmental, and sociocultural variability across populations, reinforcing the importance of truly personalized and equitable reproductive care.

6. Systemic Conditions and Consequences of POI

Beyond reproductive dysfunction, POI exerts profound effects on systemic health [18,63,214]. These effects arise through two main mechanisms: pleiotropy, where POI is one of the features of a multi-system disorder caused by a single gene mutation [3,63,123], and hypoestrogenism, the prolonged estrogen deficiency resulting from ovarian failure, regardless of its etiology [1,15,18,21,214].

6.1. Pleiotropic Associations: POI as a Multi-System Disorder

Many genes implicated in POI function in ubiquitous cellular pathways, leading to syndromic and/or systemic presentations (Table 2).
a. Cancer Predisposition: Defects in DNA damage repair pathways are frequently observed in POI due to pathogenic gene variants [64,65] and are well known to predispose affected individuals to malignancies [215,216]. This shared vulnerability is exemplified by several inherited human syndromes. Fanconi anemia, resulting from mutations in FANC and BRCA genes, and ataxia telangiectasia, caused by ATM mutations, are characterized by genomic instability, increased cancer susceptibility, and ovarian failure or infertility [24,67,70,71,112,217]. Similarly, Bloom Syndrome, caused by mutations in BLM, features short stature, cancer risk, and female infertility [218]. Animal models further support this association. For example, BRCA2 knockout mice recapitulate key features of human POI, including accelerated oocyte loss and infertility, underscoring the essential role of DNA repair pathways in maintaining ovarian reserve [69,70]. Clinically, the relationship between POI and cancer appears bidirectional. Women with POI exhibit an increased risk of certain reproductive cancers [219,220] while the risk of POI is reportedly increased in adolescent and young adult cancer survivors, particularly following gonadotoxic therapies [214,221]. Together, these observations highlight the complex interplay between genomic instability, ovarian failure, and cancer susceptibility.
b. Neurological Links: Several POI-associated genes intersect with neurological pathways, exemplifying pleiotropy. Perrault Syndrome, an autosomal recessive disorder, combines sensorineural hearing loss with POI and is linked to genes like CLPP and HARS2 [222]. It can also involve progressive neurological symptoms like ataxia [222]. Variants in POLG, a key regulator of mitochondrial DNA replication and repair, have been linked to both POI and Parkinson’s disease, reflecting shared vulnerabilities related to mitochondrial dysfunction and accumulated cellular damage [118,150,223]. Similarly, GPR3 has been implicated in POI and independently associated with Alzheimer’s disease, although the underlying mechanisms may differ between ovarian and neuronal contexts [96,224]. Developmental and metabolic syndromes further illustrate the systemic reach of POI. Blepharophimosis-Ptosis-Epicanthus Inversus Syndrome (BPES), caused by FOXL2 mutations, combines POI (Type 1 BPES) with distinctive eyelid malformations [114,225]. Galactosemia, due to GALT mutations, leads to toxic galactose accumulation and POI, even in treated individuals, alongside neurodevelopmental delays [115,226,227]. Together, these examples underscore the convergence of reproductive and neurological phenotypes through shared genetic pathways and reinforce the concept of POI as part of broader systemic and neurodevelopmental networks.
c. Autoimmunity: Autoimmune mechanisms account for up to 20–30% of POI cases, with increased risk in conditions such as Hashimoto thyroiditis, Graves’ disease, and type 1 and type 2 diabetes [3,47]. Mutations in AIRE cause autoimmune polyglandular syndrome (APS), presenting with a triad of Addison’s disease, hypoparathyroidism, and POI [228]. Reduced expression of FOXO3α has been observed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and inflammatory bowel disease [139,229,230]. Additional autoimmune disorders associated with this condition include hypophysitis, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, vitiligo, alopecia, autoimmune hemolytic anemia, pernicious anemia, Sjogren’s syndrome, primary biliary cirrhosis, and chronic active hepatitis [3,13,15,47,62,116].
Table 2. Representative Systemic Health Conditions Associated with POI-Related Genes.
Table 2. Representative Systemic Health Conditions Associated with POI-Related Genes.
Associated
Condition
Key POI-Related GenesSummary of Findings
CancersBRCA2, MSH4, WT1Associated with Breast Cancer. BRCA2 mutations are a well-established risk factor [231]. Polymorphisms in MSH4 [232] and WT1 [233] are also linked.
DMC1, RECQL, BRCAAssociated with Ovarian Cancer [234]. BRCA mutations increase the risk of serous ovarian cancer [235].
MCM9, LHX8, POLGImplicated in Cervical Cancer progression, especially in HPV-positive cases [236,237,238].
MCM8, POLGOverexpression of MCM8 correlates with poor Gastric Cancer prognosis [239]; POLG underexpression is linked to reduced survival [240].
BRCA2, MCM8, WT1Mutations have been associated with various forms of Leukemia [57,69,233].
Neurological ComplicationsMCM8, GPR3Linked to Alzheimer’s Disease pathology, especially in estrogen-deficient states [224,241].
POLGVariants identified in Parkinson’s Disease patients, reflecting its role in mitochondrial dysfunction [118,223].
MCM9Variants associated with meiosis I errors in maternal oocytes, increasing the risk of Down Syndrome [242].
AutoimmunityAIREMutations contribute to Autoimmune Polyglandular Syndromes (APS) and Addison’s disease [46].
FOXO3αDecreased expression observed in Rheumatoid Arthritis, Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD), and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) [229].

6.2. Consequences of Hypoestrogenism

Separate from genetic syndromes, the loss of ovarian function itself imposes systemic health risks due to the prolonged absence of estrogen [18,20,243]. These effects can occur in any woman with POI, regardless of the cause. Major health impacts include osteoporosis due to rapid bone loss, increased cardiovascular risk through endothelial dysfunction and adverse lipid changes, and a range of neurological and psychosocial effects (discussed below). These findings underscore the need to view POI not only as a reproductive disorder but as a systemic condition with broad clinical implications requiring long-term multidisciplinary management [3,18].

7. Psychosocial Impact of POI

POI exerts a profound and multifaceted impact on mental and emotional well-being, extending well beyond reproductive concerns [244,245,246] (Figure 2).
Women with POI frequently report impaired quality of life, often driven by the life-altering diagnosis of infertility [247]. In a cross-sectional study by Singer et al. [248], most participants described the diagnosis as traumatic, a reaction compounded by limited awareness of POI and inadequate guidance from healthcare professionals. As a consequence, many women turned to online resources rather than medical experts for information and support. Younger patients expressed heightened anxiety about physical development and growth, underscoring the strong influence of age and life stage on the psychosocial burden of POI.
Recent meta-analyses and large cohort studies confirm that POI is strongly associated with mental health disorders [244,245,249]. A 2024 systematic review and meta-analysis by Tian et al. [245] found that women with POI have a 2.7-fold higher risk of depression and a 3.7-fold higher risk of anxiety compared to age-matched controls. POI was also linked to a 2.6-fold increased risk of poor quality of life, encompassing fatigue, guilt, grief, loneliness, insomnia, and impaired self-esteem. These findings were consistent across idiopathic and iatrogenic POI subtypes, with unmarried women showing particularly elevated risks for depression [245]. In a 2025 cross-sectional study of 345 women [244], 29.9% reported clinically significant depressive symptoms, with severity strongly associated with younger age at diagnosis, severe menopausal symptoms, lack of emotional support, and fertility-related grief. Notably, estradiol levels and hormone therapy did not correlate with depression [244], emphasizing the primacy of psychosocial over hormonal determinants of mental health outcomes in POI.
Delays in diagnosis further exacerbate emotional distress [250,251]. Alzubaidi et al. [252] reported that 25% of women waited over five years for a confirmed diagnosis, with more than half consulting at least three clinicians before appropriate testing. During this prolonged diagnostic journey, many experienced shock, denial, anger, and grief, reflecting the psychological toll of uncertainty and misdiagnosis.
The diagnosis of POI also affects self-perception, identity, and confidence [245,253,254], with 78% of women reporting long-term emotional consequences [245]. Lifetime depression rates in POI approach 54.5%, often intensified by the intersection of infertility, familial expectations, and societal roles [245]. The concept of biographical disruption, a sudden break in life trajectory and identity, emerges as a central theme in POI-related distress [244,255]. Loss of fertility, altered life goals, and perceived social stigma amplify vulnerability to depression and anxiety [253]. Comparable psychosocial patterns are observed in Turner syndrome, where delayed diagnosis is associated with increased odds of depressive symptoms, poor self-image, and higher rates of substance use, underscoring shared mechanisms of chronic reproductive disruption [256].
Cultural norms and socioeconomic pressures further amplify the emotional burden of POI [251,257]. In many societies, reproductive capacity is closely tied to identity and social value, making POI not only a medical condition but also a source of stigma and isolation [257]. Cross-cultural studies confirm that infertility stigma and reduced perceived social support are significant contributors to poor quality of life in POI patients [244]. Importantly, nearly 69% of participants in the Singer et al. study expressed a strong interest in peer support groups and educational workshops [248], emphasizing the unmet need for structured, culturally sensitive psychosocial interventions.
Emerging evidence also suggests a bidirectional relationship between psychosocial stressors and POI risk [39,246,258]. Large-scale meta-analyses indicate that Type A personality traits, characterized by competitiveness, time urgency, and perfectionism, are associated with a six-fold increased risk of POI [38]. Chronic stress, sleep deprivation, and negative mood states were also identified as significant risk factors, with odds ratios ranging from 3.3 to 4.7 [39]. Together, these findings suggest that psychological distress may not only arise as a consequence of POI but may also contribute to its onset, potentially through dysregulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis and stress-induced epigenetic modifications.

8. Discussion and Future Directions

POI research is shifting from single-gene etiologies toward broader epigenetic, environmental, microbial, and lifestyle determinants [39]. Despite these advances, most POI cases remain idiopathic, indicating that current diagnostic frameworks incompletely capture its multifactorial and polygenic nature [62]. As reviewed here, POI frequently arises from complex gene-gene interactions or syndromic involvement, complicating genotype-phenotype correlations and limiting clinical translation [28,196,259]. Advances in high-throughput sequencing, spatial transcriptomics, and CRISPR-Cas9 are redefining ovarian aging biology and enabling earlier detection and more personalized interventions [260].
Host-microbiome interactions represent an emerging frontier in POI research [45,261]. The gut and vaginal microbiome influence ovarian function through effects on estrogen metabolism, immune signaling, oxidative stress, and follicular development [39,45,261]. Dysbiosis may therefore represent a modifiable risk factor, offering opportunities for preventative and adjunctive interventions such as dietary modulation and probiotic therapy.
A major unmet need in POI care is the identification of robust biomarkers that predict ovarian decline before irreversible follicular loss, alongside effective fertility-preserving or restorative strategies [3,28]. The DNA repair-POI axis presents a particularly promising path for biomarker discovery [59,64,65,112]. Regulators of HR, including RAD51 and the meiosis-specific DMC1, maintain oocyte genome integrity and merit systematic biochemical and cellular validation as candidate biomarkers and therapeutic targets [262]. Integrating functional assays with longitudinal clinical cohorts and multi-omics approaches spanning genomics, epigenomics, and microbiomics will be essential to improve diagnostic precision and elucidate disease mechanisms.
Epigenetic profiling also offers opportunities for both risk stratification and intervention. DNA-methylation-based epigenetic clocks may forecast ovarian reserve and reproductive-aging trajectories [161]. Preclinical studies demonstrate that epigenetic therapies, including histone deacetylase inhibitors [38,162], miRNA modulators [263], and stem cell-derived exosomes [27,264], can partially restore ovarian function [28,265]. For example, bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell exosomes carrying miR-144-5p [266] or miR-644-5p [267] reduce granulosa cell apoptosis and improve ovarian outcomes in animal models. Lifestyle interventions such as regular physical activity and vegetable-rich diets may further mitigate POI risk by modulating oxidative stress and hormonal homeostasis [44].
Clinically, translating genetic insights into proactive care is critical. Women carrying pathogenic variants in DNA repair pathways may benefit from earlier fertility preservation, including oocyte cryopreservation before substantial ovarian reserve depletion [18]. Given evidence that mitochondrial dysfunction contributes to ovarian aging and infertility [52,55], and that menopausal hormone therapy may help mitigate aspects of accelerated biological aging [22,268], further mechanistic and clinical studies of these interventions are warranted.
Beyond its immediate clinical relevance, POI provides insight into the physiology of ovarian aging. Large-scale genomic studies identify signals in DNA repair genes that influence both age at natural menopause and ovarian reserve [7,269], reinforcing the central role of genome stability in reproductive lifespan [270]. Understanding these shared mechanisms may inform strategies to extend fertility potential and improve long-term health.
Alongside biological discovery, future research must address persistent gaps in population representation and the interplay between psychological and biological factors. A large proportion of genomic studies have focused on Han Chinese cohorts; inclusion of underrepresented African American and Hispanic populations is essential for clarifying ethnic-specific pathways, such as androgen metabolism and stress responsiveness [124]. Equally important is elucidating the bidirectional relationship between POI and mental health [258,271]. Recent evidence that chronic psychological stress may contribute to POI pathogenesis in some individuals necessitates integrative models linking sustained stress, hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis dysregulation, and epigenetic remodeling to ovarian dysfunction [39].
Integrating biological understanding with equity-focused approaches is central to advancing POI care toward early intervention, precision prevention, and lifelong reproductive health. Priorities include early risk detection, fertility-preserving strategies, inclusive genomic research, and culturally tailored support. Mechanistic insights into genome stability, mitochondrial function, epigenetic remodeling, and lifestyle factors can drive the development of actionable biomarkers and targeted therapies. Leveraging POI as a model of ovarian aging can shift care from late-stage management to proactive, precision interventions that safeguard reproductive potential and extend women’s health span.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and supervision, R.A., C.H.-S., and S.S.; writing—original draft preparation, C.H.-S. and R.A.; writing—review and editing, S.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Institute on Aging under Award Number 1R25AG047843.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Acknowledgments

Research and training in the Sharma lab are supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award Number SC1GM093999, the National Science Foundation under Award Number NSF1832163, and the National Institute on Aging of the NIH under Award Numbers 1R25AG047843 and R25AG086106. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the funding agencies. During the preparation of this manuscript, the authors used Microsoft 365 Copilot (Version number: 2.20260115.41.0) and Google Gemini 3 Pro for assistance with language editing, formatting, and structural organization. The authors have reviewed and edited the output and take full responsibility for the content of this publication.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Muhammad, Y.A. Reproductive aging in biological females: Mechanisms and immediate consequences. Front. Endocrinol. 2025, 16, 1658592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Federici, S.; Rossetti, R.; Moleri, S.; Munari, E.V.; Frixou, M.; Bonomi, M.; Persani, L. Primary ovarian insufficiency: Update on clinical and genetic findings. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 15, 1464803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Touraine, P.; Chabbert-Buffet, N.; Plu-Bureau, G.; Duranteau, L.; Sinclair, A.H.; Tucker, E.J. Premature ovarian insufficiency. Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers 2024, 10, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Li, M.; Zhu, Y.; Wei, J.; Chen, L.; Chen, S.; Lai, D. The global prevalence of premature ovarian insufficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Climacteric 2023, 26, 95–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Di-Battista, A.; Favilla, B.P.; Zamariolli, M.; Nunes, N.; Defelicibus, A.; Armelin-Correa, L.; da Silva, I.T.; Reymond, A.; Moyses-Oliveira, M.; Melaragno, M.I. Premature ovarian insufficiency is associated with global alterations in the regulatory landscape and gene expression in balanced X-autosome translocations. Epigenetics Chromatin 2023, 16, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cui, J.; Wang, Y. Premature ovarian insufficiency: A review on the role of tobacco smoke, its clinical harm, and treatment. J. Ovarian Res. 2024, 17, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ruth, K.S.; Day, F.R.; Hussain, J.; Martínez-Marchal, A.; Aiken, C.E.; Azad, A.; Thompson, D.J.; Knoblochova, L.; Abe, H.; Tarry-Adkins, J.L.; et al. Genetic insights into biological mechanisms governing human ovarian ageing. Nature 2021, 596, 393–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chon, S.J.; Umair, Z.; Yoon, M. Premature Ovarian Insufficiency: Past, Present, and Future. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 9, 672890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kalantaridou, S.N.; Nelson, L.M. Premature ovarian failure is not premature menopause. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2000, 900, 393–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yatsenko, S.A.; Witchel, S.F.; Gordon, C.M. Primary Amenorrhea and Premature Ovarian Insufficiency. Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. N. Am. 2024, 53, 293–305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Klein, D.A.; Paradise, S.L.; Reeder, R.M. Amenorrhea: A Systematic Approach to Diagnosis and Management. Am. Fam. Physician 2019, 100, 39–48. [Google Scholar]
  12. Nelson, L.M. Clinical practice. Primary ovarian insufficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 606–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kovanci, E.; Schutt, A.K. Premature ovarian failure: Clinical presentation and treatment. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. N. Am. 2015, 42, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sun, B.; Li, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, F.; Sun, Y. Pregnancy outcomes in women with primary ovarian insufficiency in assisted reproductive technology therapy: A retrospective study. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 15, 1343803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ishizuka, B. Current Understanding of the Etiology, Symptomatology, and Treatment Options in Premature Ovarian Insufficiency (POI). Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 12, 626924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Anonymous. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 760: Dysmenorrhea and Endometriosis in the Adolescent. Obstet. Gynecol. 2018, 132, e249–e258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. European Society for Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) Guideline Group on POI; Webber, L.; Davies, M.; Anderson, R.; Bartlett, J.; Braat, D.; Cartwright, B.; Cifkova, R.; de Muinck Keizer-Schrama, S.; Hogervorst, E.; et al. ESHRE Guideline: Management of women with premature ovarian insufficiency. Hum. Reprod. 2016, 31, 926–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Panay, N.; Anderson, R.A.; Bennie, A.; Cedars, M.; Davies, M.; Ee, C.; Gravholt, C.H.; Kalantaridou, S.; Kallen, A.; Kim, K.Q.; et al. Evidence-based guideline: Premature ovarian insufficiency. Hum. Reprod. Open 2024, 2024, hoae065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rebar, R.W. Premature ovarian failure. Obstet. Gynecol. 2009, 113, 1355–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. De Vos, M.; Devroey, P.; Fauser, B.C.J.M. Primary ovarian insufficiency. Lancet 2010, 376, 911–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Webber, L.; Anderson, R.A.; Davies, M.; Janse, F.; Vermeulen, N. HRT for women with premature ovarian insufficiency: A comprehensive review. Hum. Reprod. Open 2017, 2017, hox007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhou, J.; Fan, M.; Lett, A.M.; Jin, G.; You, Q.; Zeng, J.; Chen, B.; Wu, Y.; Xing, H.; Xu, S. Association between premature ovarian insufficiency and biological aging. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2025, 192, 744–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tesarik, J.; Galán-Lázaro, M.; Mendoza-Tesarik, R. Ovarian Aging: Molecular Mechanisms and Medical Management. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Huang, Y.; Liu, Z.; Geng, Y.; Li, F.; Hu, R.; Song, Y.; Zhang, M.; Song, K. The risk factors, pathogenesis and treatment of premature ovarian insufficiency. J. Ovarian Res. 2025, 18, 134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Jafarzade, A.; Anadol, E.; Çaydere, M.; Burgucu, D.; Yılmaz, C.; Ergişi, S.; Mungan, T. Investigation of the Efficacy of Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell and Melatonin Treatment in Premature Ovarian Failure Model. Reprod. Sci. 2025, 32, 2985–2996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yan, L.; Tu, W.; Zhao, X.; Wan, H.; Wu, J.; Zhao, Y.; Wu, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhu, L.; Qin, Y.; et al. Stem cell transplantation extends the reproductive life span of naturally aging cynomolgus monkeys. Cell Discov. 2024, 10, 111–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ali, I.; Padhiar, A.A.; Wang, T.; He, L.; Chen, M.; Wu, S.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, G. Stem Cell-Based Therapeutic Strategies for Premature Ovarian Insufficiency and Infertility: A Focus on Aging. Cells 2022, 11, 3713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guo, T.; Liu, H.; Xu, B.; Qi, Y.; Xu, K.; Wu, X.; He, X.; Qin, Y.; Chen, Z. Epidemiology, Genetic Etiology, and Intervention of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency. Endocr. Rev. 2025, 46, 621–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ahmadi, F.; Gharaei, R.; Shirali, E.; Adabi, K.; Alishahi, V.; Tajaldini, M. The impact of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on ovarian function and oocyte quality: A comprehensive review. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2025, 172, 104649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Picton, H.M.; Harris, S.E.; Muruvi, W.; Chambers, E.L. The in vitro growth and maturation of follicles. Reproduction 2008, 136, 703–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Grive, K.J. Pathways coordinating oocyte attrition and abundance during mammalian ovarian reserve establishment. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 2020, 87, 843–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Telfer, E.E.; Grosbois, J.; Odey, Y.L.; Rosario, R.; Anderson, R.A. Making a good egg: Human oocyte health, aging, and in vitro development. Physiol. Rev. 2023, 103, 2623–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Stringer, J.M.; Alesi, L.R.; Winship, A.L.; Hutt, K.J. Beyond apoptosis: Evidence of other regulated cell death pathways in the ovary throughout development and life. Hum. Reprod. Update 2023, 29, 434–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zussman, J.W.; Skinner, D.J.; Wagner, D.E.; Shvartsman, S.Y.; Laird, D.J. Evaluating Selective Quality Control in Mammalian Oogenesis: Evidence and Opportunities. Annu. Rev. Genet. 2025, 59, 237–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Anderson, R.A.; Marston, A.L.; Telfer, E.E. Oocyte development: It’s all about quality. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2025, 50, 104804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ata, B.; Seyhan, A.; Seli, E. Diminished ovarian reserve versus ovarian aging: Overlaps and differences. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2019, 31, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wu, J.; Liu, Y.; Song, Y.; Wang, L.; Ai, J.; Li, K. Aging conundrum: A perspective for ovarian aging. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 952471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhu, Z.; Xu, W.; Liu, L. Ovarian aging: Mechanisms and intervention strategies. Med. Rev. 2022, 2, 590–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lin, S.; Chen, S.; Zhang, Q. Factors influencing premature ovarian insufficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2025, 45, 2469331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dong, R.; Abazarikia, A.; Luan, Y.; Yu, S.; Kim, S. Molecular Mechanisms Determining Mammalian Oocyte Quality with the Treatment of Cancer Therapy. Adv. Anat. Embryol. Cell Biol. 2024, 238, 97–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kashi, O.; Meirow, D. Overactivation or Apoptosis: Which Mechanisms Affect Chemotherapy-Induced Ovarian Reserve Depletion? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Wang, L.; Ma, X.; Liu, J. Adverse Effects of Pesticides on the Ovary: Evidence from Epidemiological and Toxicological Studies. Environ. Health 2025, 3, 575–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Pandey, A.N.; Yadav, P.K.; Premkumar, K.V.; Tiwari, M.; Antony, M.M.; Pandey, A.K.; Chaube, S.K. Damage mechanisms of bisphenols on the quality of mammalian oocytes. Hum. Reprod. 2025, 40, 186–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Shelling, A.N.; Ahmed Nasef, N. The Role of Lifestyle and Dietary Factors in the Development of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency. Antioxidants 2023, 12, 1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Huang, F.; Cao, Y.; Liang, J.; Tang, R.; Wu, S.; Zhang, P.; Chen, R. The influence of the gut microbiome on ovarian aging. Gut Microbes 2024, 16, 2295394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Perniola, R.; Fierabracci, A.; Falorni, A. Autoimmune Addison’s Disease as Part of the Autoimmune Polyglandular Syndrome Type 1: Historical Overview and Current Evidence. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 606860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Szeliga, A.; Calik-Ksepka, A.; Maciejewska-Jeske, M.; Grymowicz, M.; Smolarczyk, K.; Kostrzak, A.; Smolarczyk, R.; Rudnicka, E.; Meczekalski, B. Autoimmune Diseases in Patients with Premature Ovarian Insufficiency—Our Current State of Knowledge. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cai, W.; Luo, X.; Wu, W.; Song, J.; Xie, N.; Duan, C.; Wu, X.; Xu, J. Metabolic differences in women with premature ovarian insufficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Ovarian Res. 2022, 15, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ağaçayak, E.; Yaman Görük, N.; Küsen, H.; Yaman Tunç, S.; Başaranoğlu, S.; İçen, M.S.; Yıldızbakan, A.; Yüksel, H.; Kalkanlı, S.; Gül, T. Role of inflammation and oxidative stress in the etiology of primary ovarian insufficiency. Turk. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 13, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, V.; Walsh, J.A.; Zell, J.; Verrilli, L.E.; Letourneau, J.M.; Johnstone, E.B.; Allen-Brady, K.; Welt, C.K. Autoimmune Disease is Increased in Women with Primary Ovarian Insufficiency. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2025, 110, e2614–e2620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. May-Panloup, P.; Boucret, L.; Chao de la Barca, J.; Desquiret-Dumas, V.; Ferré-L’Hotellier, V.; Morinière, C.; Descamps, P.; Procaccio, V.; Reynier, P. Ovarian ageing: The role of mitochondria in oocytes and follicles. Hum. Reprod. Update 2016, 22, 725–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ju, W.; Zhao, Y.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, S.; Xiang, S.; Lian, F. Mechanisms of mitochondrial dysfunction in ovarian aging and potential interventions. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 15, 1361289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Chen, A.; Tiosano, D.; Guran, T.; Baris, H.N.; Bayram, Y.; Mory, A.; Shapiro-Kulnane, L.; Hodges, C.A.; Akdemir, Z.C.; Turan, S.; et al. Mutations in the mitochondrial ribosomal protein MRPS22 lead to primary ovarian insufficiency. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2018, 27, 1913–1926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Tiosano, D.; Mears, J.A.; Buchner, D.A. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in Primary Ovarian Insufficiency. Endocrinology 2019, 160, 2353–2366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhang, X.; Zhang, L.; Xiang, W. The impact of mitochondrial dysfunction on ovarian aging. J. Transl. Med. 2025, 23, 211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Yang, X.; Yang, L. Current understanding of the genomic abnormities in premature ovarian failure: Chance for early diagnosis and management. Front. Med. 2023, 10, 1194865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ke, H.; Tang, S.; Guo, T.; Hou, D.; Jiao, X.; Li, S.; Luo, W.; Xu, B.; Zhao, S.; Li, G.; et al. Landscape of pathogenic mutations in premature ovarian insufficiency. Nat. Med. 2023, 29, 483–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Yang, Q.; Mumusoglu, S.; Qin, Y.; Sun, Y.; Hsueh, A.J. A kaleidoscopic view of ovarian genes associated with premature ovarian insufficiency and senescence. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Katari, S.; Aarabi, M.; Kintigh, A.; Mann, S.; Yatsenko, S.A.; Sanfilippo, J.S.; Zeleznik, A.J.; Rajkovic, A. Chromosomal instability in women with primary ovarian insufficiency. Hum. Reprod. 2018, 33, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Fukami, M. Ovarian dysfunction in women with Turner syndrome. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1160258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Di-Battista, A.; Moysés-Oliveira, M.; Melaragno, M.I. Genetics of premature ovarian insufficiency and the association with X-autosome translocations. Reproduction 2020, 160, R55–R64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Csehely, S.; Kun, A.; Orbán, E.; Katona, T.; Orosz, M.; Krasznai, Z.T.; Deli, T.; Jakab, A. Changing Etiological Spectrum of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency over the Past Decades: A Comparative Analysis of Two Cohorts from a Single Center. Diagnostics 2025, 15, 1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Nie, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, S.; Hong, Z.; Wang, M. Genetic insights into the complexity of premature ovarian insufficiency. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2024, 22, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Stringer, J.M.; Winship, A.; Liew, S.H.; Hutt, K. The capacity of oocytes for DNA repair. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2018, 75, 2777–2792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Veitia, R.A. Primary ovarian insufficiency, meiosis and DNA repair. Biomed. J. 2020, 43, 115–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ding, X.; Gong, X.; Fan, Y.; Cao, J.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, X.; Meng, K. DNA double-strand break genetic variants in patients with premature ovarian insufficiency. J. Ovarian Res. 2023, 16, 135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yang, X.; Zhang, X.; Jiao, J.; Zhang, F.; Pan, Y.; Wang, Q.; Chen, Q.; Cai, B.; Tang, S.; Zhou, Z.; et al. Rare variants in FANCA induce premature ovarian insufficiency. Hum. Genet. 2019, 138, 1227–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. França, M.M.; Mendonca, B.B. Genetics of Primary Ovarian Insufficiency in the Next-Generation Sequencing Era. J. Endocr. Soc. 2019, 4, bvz037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Weinberg-Shukron, A.; Rachmiel, M.; Renbaum, P.; Gulsuner, S.; Walsh, T.; Lobel, O.; Dreifuss, A.; Ben-Moshe, A.; Zeligson, S.; Segel, R.; et al. Essential Role of BRCA2 in Ovarian Development and Function. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 379, 1042–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rodríguez-Marí, A.; Wilson, C.; Titus, T.A.; Cañestro, C.; BreMiller, R.A.; Yan, Y.; Nanda, I.; Johnston, A.; Kanki, J.P.; Gray, E.M.; et al. Roles of brca2 (fancd1) in oocyte nuclear architecture, gametogenesis, gonad tumors, and genome stability in zebrafish. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7, e1001357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Alavattam, K.G.; Kato, Y.; Sin, H.; Maezawa, S.; Kowalski, I.J.; Zhang, F.; Pang, Q.; Andreassen, P.R.; Namekawa, S.H. Elucidation of the Fanconi Anemia Protein Network in Meiosis and Its Function in the Regulation of Histone Modifications. Cell Rep. 2016, 17, 1141–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Mandon-Pépin, B.; Touraine, P.; Kuttenn, F.; Derbois, C.; Rouxel, A.; Matsuda, F.; Nicolas, A.; Cotinot, C.; Fellous, M. Genetic investigation of four meiotic genes in women with premature ovarian failure. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2008, 158, 107–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. He, W.; Tu, C.; Liu, Q.; Meng, L.; Yuan, S.; Luo, A.; He, F.; Shen, J.; Li, W.; Du, J.; et al. DMC1 mutation that causes human non-obstructive azoospermia and premature ovarian insufficiency identified by whole-exome sequencing. J. Med. Genet. 2018, 55, 198–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Guo, T.; Zhao, S.; Zhao, S.; Chen, M.; Li, G.; Jiao, X.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, Y.; Qin, Y.; Gao, F.; et al. Mutations in MSH5 in primary ovarian insufficiency. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2017, 26, 1452–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Carlosama, C.; Elzaiat, M.; Patiño, L.C.; Mateus, H.E.; Veitia, R.A.; Laissue, P. A homozygous donor splice-site mutation in the meiotic gene MSH4 causes primary ovarian insufficiency. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2017, 26, 3161–3166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Li, G.; Yang, X.; Wang, L.; Pan, Y.; Chen, S.; Shang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Chen, Q.; et al. Haploinsufficiency in non-homologous end joining factor 1 induces ovarian dysfunction in humans and mice. J. Med. Genet. 2022, 59, 579–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Huang, C.; Zhao, S.; Yang, Y.; Guo, T.; Ke, H.; Mi, X.; Qin, Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, S. TP63 gain-of-function mutations cause premature ovarian insufficiency by inducing oocyte apoptosis. J. Clin. Investig. 2023, 133, e162315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Petronczki, M.; Siomos, M.F.; Nasmyth, K. Un ménage à quatre: The molecular biology of chromosome segregation in meiosis. Cell 2003, 112, 423–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Bolcun-Filas, E.; Hall, E.; Speed, R.; Taggart, M.; Grey, C.; de Massy, B.; Benavente, R.; Cooke, H.J. Mutation of the mouse Syce1 gene disrupts synapsis and suggests a link between synaptonemal complex structural components and DNA repair. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5, e1000393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. de Vries, L.; Behar, D.M.; Smirin-Yosef, P.; Lagovsky, I.; Tzur, S.; Basel-Vanagaite, L. Exome sequencing reveals SYCE1 mutation associated with autosomal recessive primary ovarian insufficiency. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2014, 99, 2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Caburet, S.; Arboleda, V.A.; Llano, E.; Overbeek, P.A.; Barbero, J.L.; Oka, K.; Harrison, W.; Vaiman, D.; Ben-Neriah, Z.; García-Tuñón, I.; et al. Mutant cohesin in premature ovarian failure. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 943–949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Zhe, J.; Chen, S.; Chen, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Zhou, X.; Zhang, J. A novel heterozygous splice-altering mutation in HFM1 may be a cause of premature ovarian insufficiency. J. Ovarian Res. 2019, 12, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Guiraldelli, M.F.; Eyster, C.; Wilkerson, J.L.; Dresser, M.E.; Pezza, R.J. Mouse HFM1/Mer3 is required for crossover formation and complete synapsis of homologous chromosomes during meiosis. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Caburet, S.; Todeschini, A.; Petrillo, C.; Martini, E.; Farran, N.D.; Legois, B.; Livera, G.; Younis, J.S.; Shalev, S.; Veitia, R.A. A truncating MEIOB mutation responsible for familial primary ovarian insufficiency abolishes its interaction with its partner SPATA22 and their recruitment to DNA double-strand breaks. eBioMedicine 2019, 42, 524–531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Zhang, Y.; Yan, Z.; Qin, Q.; Nisenblat, V.; Chang, H.; Yu, Y.; Wang, T.; Lu, C.; Yang, M.; Yang, S.; et al. Transcriptome Landscape of Human Folliculogenesis Reveals Oocyte and Granulosa Cell Interactions. Mol. Cell 2018, 72, 1021–1034.e4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sperduti, S.; Baschieri, L.; Cimadomo, D.; Lazzaretti, C.; Davolio, F.; Innocenti, F.; Taggi, M.; Albricci, L.; Rienzi, L.; Vaiarelli, A.; et al. Gene expression pattern predictive of human ovarian follicle development and maturation. Reproduction 2025, 170, e250176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Zhao, H.; Chen, Z.; Qin, Y.; Shi, Y.; Wang, S.; Choi, Y.; Simpson, J.L.; Rajkovic, A. Transcription factor FIGLA is mutated in patients with premature ovarian failure. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2008, 82, 1342–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Soyal, S.M.; Amleh, A.; Dean, J. FIGalpha, a germ cell-specific transcription factor required for ovarian follicle formation. Development 2000, 127, 4645–4654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Pangas, S.A.; Choi, Y.; Ballow, D.J.; Zhao, Y.; Westphal, H.; Matzuk, M.M.; Rajkovic, A. Oogenesis requires germ cell-specific transcriptional regulators Sohlh1 and Lhx8. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 8090–8095. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cattoni, A.; Spano, A.; Tulone, A.; Boneschi, A.; Masera, N.; Maitz, S.; Di Blasio, A.M.; Persani, L.; Guizzardi, F.; Rossetti, R. The Potential Synergic Effect of a Complex Pattern of Multiple Inherited Genetic Variants as a Pathogenic Factor for Ovarian Dysgenesis: A Case Report. Front. Endocrinol. 2020, 11, 540683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bouilly, J.; Bachelot, A.; Broutin, I.; Touraine, P.; Binart, N. Novel NOBOX loss-of-function mutations account for 6.2% of cases in a large primary ovarian insufficiency cohort. Hum. Mutat. 2011, 32, 1108–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Choi, Y.; Ballow, D.J.; Xin, Y.; Rajkovic, A. Lim homeobox gene, lhx8, is essential for mouse oocyte differentiation and survival. Biol. Reprod. 2008, 79, 442–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Camats, N.; Pandey, A.V.; Fernández-Cancio, M.; Andaluz, P.; Janner, M.; Torán, N.; Moreno, F.; Bereket, A.; Akcay, T.; García-García, E.; et al. Ten novel mutations in the NR5A1 gene cause disordered sex development in 46,XY and ovarian insufficiency in 46,XX individuals. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, 1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Achermann, J.C.; Ito, M.; Ito, M.; Hindmarsh, P.C.; Jameson, J.L. A mutation in the gene encoding steroidogenic factor-1 causes XY sex reversal and adrenal failure in humans. Nat. Genet. 1999, 22, 125–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Ledent, C.; Demeestere, I.; Blum, D.; Petermans, J.; Hämäläinen, T.; Smits, G.; Vassart, G. Premature ovarian aging in mice deficient for Gpr3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 8922–8926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ren, S.; Zhang, F.; Shang, L.; Yang, X.; Pan, Y.; Zhang, X.; Wu, Y. Rare variants in GPR3 in POI patients: A case series with review of literature. J. Ovarian Res. 2023, 16, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Wang, H.; Li, G.; Zhang, J.; Gao, F.; Li, W.; Qin, Y.; Chen, Z. Novel WT1 Missense Mutations in Han Chinese Women with Premature Ovarian Failure. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wang, B.; Mu, Y.; Ni, F.; Zhou, S.; Wang, J.; Cao, Y.; Ma, X. Analysis of FOXO3 mutation in 114 Chinese women with premature ovarian failure. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2010, 20, 499–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Mehta, P.; Sharma, A.; Goswami, A.; Gupta, S.K.; Singhal, V.; Srivastava, K.R.; Chattopadhyay, N.; Singh, R. Case report: Exome sequencing identified mutations in the LRP5 and LGR4 genes in a case of osteoporosis with recurrent fractures and extraskeletal manifestations. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 15, 1475446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. He, W.; Du, J.; Yang, X.; Li, W.; Tang, W.; Dai, C.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Lu, G.; Lin, G.; et al. Novel inactivating mutations in the FSH receptor cause premature ovarian insufficiency with resistant ovary syndrome. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2019, 38, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Liu, H.; Xu, X.; Han, T.; Yan, L.; Cheng, L.; Qin, Y.; Liu, W.; Zhao, S.; Chen, Z. A novel homozygous mutation in the FSHR gene is causative for primary ovarian insufficiency. Fertil. Steril. 2017, 108, 1050–1055.e2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Jiang, M.; Aittomäki, K.; Nilsson, C.; Pakarinen, P.; Iitiä, A.; Torresani, T.; Simonsen, H.; Goh, V.; Pettersson, K.; de la Chapelle, A.; et al. The frequency of an inactivating point mutation (566C→T) of the human follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene in four populations using allele-specific hybridization and time-resolved fluorometry. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 1998, 83, 4338–4343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  103. Aittomäki, K.; Lucena, J.L.; Pakarinen, P.; Sistonen, P.; Tapanainen, J.; Gromoll, J.; Kaskikari, R.; Sankila, E.M.; Lehväslaiho, H.; Engel, A.R.; et al. Mutation in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor gene causes hereditary hypergonadotropic ovarian failure. Cell 1995, 82, 959–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Huang, W.; Cao, Y.; Shi, L. Effects of FSHR polymorphisms on premature ovarian insufficiency in human beings: A meta-analysis. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2019, 17, 80–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Patiño, L.C.; Walton, K.L.; Mueller, T.D.; Johnson, K.E.; Stocker, W.; Richani, D.; Agapiou, D.; Gilchrist, R.B.; Laissue, P.; Harrison, C.A. BMP15 Mutations Associated with Primary Ovarian Insufficiency Reduce Expression, Activity, or Synergy with GDF9. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2017, 102, 1009–1019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Hussein, T.S.; Thompson, J.G.; Gilchrist, R.B. Oocyte-secreted factors enhance oocyte developmental competence. Dev. Biol. 2006, 296, 514–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Laissue, P.; Christin-Maitre, S.; Touraine, P.; Kuttenn, F.; Ritvos, O.; Aittomaki, K.; Bourcigaux, N.; Jacquesson, L.; Bouchard, P.; Frydman, R.; et al. Mutations and sequence variants in GDF9 and BMP15 in patients with premature ovarian failure. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2006, 154, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Hanrahan, J.P.; Gregan, S.M.; Mulsant, P.; Mullen, M.; Davis, G.H.; Powell, R.; Galloway, S.M. Mutations in the genes for oocyte-derived growth factors GDF9 and BMP15 are associated with both increased ovulation rate and sterility in Cambridge and Belclare sheep (Ovis aries). Biol. Reprod. 2004, 70, 900–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Galloway, S.M.; McNatty, K.P.; Cambridge, L.M.; Laitinen, M.P.; Juengel, J.L.; Jokiranta, T.S.; McLaren, R.J.; Luiro, K.; Dodds, K.G.; Montgomery, G.W.; et al. Mutations in an oocyte-derived growth factor gene (BMP15) cause increased ovulation rate and infertility in a dosage-sensitive manner. Nat. Genet. 2000, 25, 279–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Verma, K.P.; Thompson, B.; Wolfe, J.; Price, S.; Djukiadmodjo, F.; Trainer, A. A homozygous truncating variant in GDF9 in siblings with primary ovarian insufficiency. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2021, 38, 1539–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhou, L.; Yang, X.; Ren, S.; Pan, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Liu, Y.; Mo, J.; Zhang, F.; Zhang, X.; Wu, Y. Novel Loss-of-function Variants of ZP3 Associated with Premature Ovarian Insufficiency. Reprod. Sci. 2024, 31, 3919–3928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. França, M.M.; Mendonca, B.B. Genetics of ovarian insufficiency and defects of folliculogenesis. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022, 36, 101594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Tang, S.; Guo, T.; Song, C.; Wang, L.; Zhang, J.; Rajkovic, A.; Lin, X.; Chen, S.; Liu, Y.; Tian, W.; et al. MGA loss-of-function variants cause premature ovarian insufficiency. J. Clin. Investig. 2024, 134, e183758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Harris, S.E.; Chand, A.L.; Winship, I.M.; Gersak, K.; Aittomäki, K.; Shelling, A.N. Identification of novel mutations in FOXL2 associated with premature ovarian failure. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2002, 8, 729–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Fridovich-Keil, J.L.; Gubbels, C.S.; Spencer, J.B.; Sanders, R.D.; Land, J.A.; Rubio-Gozalbo, E. Ovarian function in girls and women with GALT-deficiency galactosemia. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 2011, 34, 357–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Jasti, S.; Warren, B.D.; McGinnis, L.K.; Kinsey, W.H.; Petroff, B.K.; Petroff, M.G. The autoimmune regulator prevents premature reproductive senescence in female mice. Biol. Reprod. 2012, 86, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Shen, J.; Qu, D.; Gao, Y.; Sun, F.; Xie, J.; Sun, X.; Wang, D.; Ma, X.; Cui, Y.; Liu, J.; et al. Genetic etiologic analysis in 74 Chinese Han women with idiopathic premature ovarian insufficiency by combined molecular genetic testing. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2021, 38, 965–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Luoma, P.; Melberg, A.; Rinne, J.O.; Kaukonen, J.A.; Nupponen, N.N.; Chalmers, R.M.; Oldfors, A.; Rautakorpi, I.; Peltonen, L.; Majamaa, K.; et al. Parkinsonism, premature menopause, and mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma mutations: Clinical and molecular genetic study. Lancet 2004, 364, 875–882. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Masunaga, Y.; Mochizuki, M.; Kadoya, M.; Wada, Y.; Okamoto, N.; Fukami, M.; Kato, F.; Saitsu, H.; Ogata, T. Primary ovarian insufficiency in a female with phosphomannomutase-2 gene (PMM2) mutations for congenital disorder of glycosylation. Endocr. J. 2021, 68, 605–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Peng, T.; Lv, C.; Tan, H.; Huang, J.; He, H.; Wang, Y.; Zeng, M.; Yi, D.; Li, J.; Deng, H.; et al. Novel PMM2 missense mutation in a Chinese family with non-syndromic premature ovarian insufficiency. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2020, 37, 443–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Sullivan, A.K.; Marcus, M.; Epstein, M.P.; Allen, E.G.; Anido, A.E.; Paquin, J.J.; Yadav-Shah, M.; Sherman, S.L. Association of FMR1 repeat size with ovarian dysfunction. Hum. Reprod. 2005, 20, 402–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Macpherson, J.N.; Murray, A. Development of Genetic Testing for Fragile X Syndrome and Associated Disorders, and Estimates of the Prevalence of FMR1 Expansion Mutations. Genes 2016, 7, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Gorsi, B.; Hernandez, E.; Moore, M.B.; Moriwaki, M.; Chow, C.Y.; Coelho, E.; Taylor, E.; Lu, C.; Walker, A.; Touraine, P.; et al. Causal and Candidate Gene Variants in a Large Cohort of Women with Primary Ovarian Insufficiency. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2022, 107, 685–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Shohat-Tal, A.; Sen, A.; Barad, D.H.; Kushnir, V.; Gleicher, N. Genetics of androgen metabolism in women with infertility and hypoandrogenism. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2015, 11, 429–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Lledó, B.; Llácer, J.; Turienzo, A.; Ortiz, J.A.; Guerrero, J.; Morales, R.; Ten, J.; Bernabeu, R. Androgen receptor CAG repeat length is associated with ovarian reserve but not with ovarian response. Reprod. Biomed. Online 2014, 29, 509–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Eskenazi, S.; Bachelot, A.; Hugon-Rodin, J.; Plu-Bureau, G.; Gompel, A.; Catteau-Jonard, S.; Molina-Gomes, D.; Dewailly, D.; Dodé, C.; Christin-Maitre, S.; et al. Next Generation Sequencing Should be Proposed to Every Woman with “Idiopathic” Primary Ovarian Insufficiency. J. Endocr. Soc. 2021, 5, bvab032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Fouquet, B.; Pawlikowska, P.; Caburet, S.; Guigon, C.; Mäkinen, M.; Tanner, L.; Hietala, M.; Urbanska, K.; Bellutti, L.; Legois, B.; et al. A homozygous FANCM mutation underlies a familial case of non-syndromic primary ovarian insufficiency. eLife 2017, 6, e30490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Qin, Y.; Guo, T.; Li, G.; Tang, T.; Zhao, S.; Jiao, X.; Gong, J.; Gao, F.; Guo, C.; Simpson, J.L.; et al. CSB-PGBD3 Mutations Cause Premature Ovarian Failure. PLoS Genet. 2015, 11, e1005419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. He, W.; Banerjee, S.; Meng, L.; Du, J.; Gong, F.; Huang, H.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y.; Lu, G.; Lin, G.; et al. Whole-exome sequencing identifies a homozygous donor splice-site mutation in STAG3 that causes primary ovarian insufficiency. Clin. Genet. 2018, 93, 340–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Pu, D.; Wang, C.; Cao, J.; Shen, Y.; Jiang, H.; Liu, J.; Wu, B.L.; Zhang, W.; Wu, J. Association analysis between HFM1 variation and primary ovarian insufficiency in Chinese women. Clin. Genet. 2016, 89, 597–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Wang, J.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, H.; Wu, B. Primary Ovarian Insufficiency Collaboration Mutations in HFM1 in recessive primary ovarian insufficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 2014, 370, 972–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Luo, M.; Yang, F.; Leu, N.A.; Landaiche, J.; Handel, M.A.; Benavente, R.; La Salle, S.; Wang, P.J. MEIOB exhibits single-stranded DNA-binding and exonuclease activities and is essential for meiotic recombination. Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 2788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Luo, W.; Ke, H.; Tang, S.; Jiao, X.; Li, Z.; Zhao, S.; Zhang, F.; Guo, T.; Qin, Y. Next-generation sequencing of 500 POI patients identified novel responsible monogenic and oligogenic variants. J. Ovarian Res. 2023, 16, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Wang, W.; Meng, L.; He, J.; Su, L.; Li, Y.; Tan, C.; Xu, X.; Nie, H.; Zhang, H.; Du, J.; et al. Bi-allelic variants in SHOC1 cause non-obstructive azoospermia with meiosis arrest in humans and mice. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2022, 28, gaac015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Hou, X.; Zeb, A.; Dil, S.; Zhou, J.; Zhang, H.; Shi, B.; Muhammad, Z.; Khan, I.; Zaman, Q.; Shah, W.A.; et al. A homozygous KASH5 frameshift mutation causes diminished ovarian reserve, recurrent miscarriage, and non-obstructive azoospermia in humans. Front. Endocrinol. 2023, 14, 1128362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Rossetti, R.; Ferrari, I.; Bestetti, I.; Moleri, S.; Brancati, F.; Petrone, L.; Finelli, P.; Persani, L. Fundamental role of BMP15 in human ovarian folliculogenesis revealed by null and missense mutations associated with primary ovarian insufficiency. Hum. Mutat. 2020, 41, 983–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Lourenço, D.; Brauner, R.; Lin, L.; De Perdigo, A.; Weryha, G.; Muresan, M.; Boudjenah, R.; Guerra-Junior, G.; Maciel-Guerra, A.T.; Achermann, J.C.; et al. Mutations in NR5A1 associated with ovarian insufficiency. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009, 360, 1200–1210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Kouri, C.; Sommer, G.; Martinez de Lapiscina, I.; Elzenaty, R.N.; Tack, L.J.W.; Cools, M.; Ahmed, S.F.; Flück, C.E.; SF1next study group. Clinical and genetic characteristics of a large international cohort of individuals with rare NR5A1/SF-1 variants of sex development. eBioMedicine 2024, 99, 104941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Thanatsis, N.; Kaponis, A.; Koika, V.; Georgopoulos, N.A.; Decavalas, G.O. Reduced Foxo3a, FoxL2, and p27 mRNA expression in human ovarian tissue in premature ovarian insufficiency. Hormones 2019, 18, 409–415, Correction in Hormones 2019, 18, 537–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42000-019-00162-0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Lee, H.N.; Chang, E.M. Primordial follicle activation as new treatment for primary ovarian insufficiency. Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med. 2019, 46, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Zhao, X.; Mao, B.; Wang, J.; Wang, H.; Ma, X.; Yang, K.; Yang, Y. The Regulation of ZAR1 on Apoptosis and Mitophagy in Ovarian Granular Cells and Primary Ovarian Insufficiency (POI) Mice. Reprod. Sci. 2025, 32, 3429–3441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Cronister, A.; Schreiner, R.; Wittenberger, M.; Amiri, K.; Harris, K.; Hagerman, R.J. Heterozygous fragile X female: Historical, physical, cognitive, and cytogenetic features. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1991, 38, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Turner, G.; Robinson, H.; Wake, S.; Martin, N. Dizygous twinning and premature menopause in fragile X syndrome. Lancet 1994, 344, 1500–1501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Conway, G.S.; Hettiarachchi, S.; Murray, A.; Jacobs, P.A. Fragile X premutations in familial premature ovarian failure. Lancet 1995, 346, 309–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Barasoain, M.; Barrenetxea, G.; Huerta, I.; Télez, M.; Criado, B.; Arrieta, I. Study of the Genetic Etiology of Primary Ovarian Insufficiency: FMR1 Gene. Genes 2016, 7, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Cocquet, J.; Pailhoux, E.; Jaubert, F.; Servel, N.; Xia, X.; Pannetier, M.; De Baere, E.; Messiaen, L.; Cotinot, C.; Fellous, M.; et al. Evolution and expression of FOXL2. J. Med. Genet. 2002, 39, 916–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Méjécase, C.; Nigam, C.; Moosajee, M.; Bladen, J.C. The Genetic and Clinical Features of FOXL2-Related Blepharophimosis, Ptosis and Epicanthus Inversus Syndrome. Genes 2021, 12, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Kaufman, F.R.; Kogut, M.D.; Donnell, G.N.; Goebelsmann, U.; March, C.; Koch, R. Hypergonadotropic hypogonadism in female patients with galactosemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 1981, 304, 994–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Reato, G.; Morlin, L.; Chen, S.; Furmaniak, J.; Smith, B.R.; Masiero, S.; Albergoni, M.P.; Cervato, S.; Zanchetta, R.; Betterle, C. Premature ovarian failure in patients with autoimmune Addison’s disease: Clinical, genetic, and immunological evaluation. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2011, 96, 1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Pagnamenta, A.T.; Taanman, J.; Wilson, C.J.; Anderson, N.E.; Marotta, R.; Duncan, A.J.; Bitner-Glindzicz, M.; Taylor, R.W.; Laskowski, A.; Thorburn, D.R.; et al. Dominant inheritance of premature ovarian failure associated with mutant mitochondrial DNA polymerase gamma. Hum. Reprod. 2006, 21, 2467–2473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Moriwaki, M.; Moore, B.; Mosbruger, T.; Neklason, D.W.; Yandell, M.; Jorde, L.B.; Welt, C.K. POLR2C Mutations Are Associated with Primary Ovarian Insufficiency in Women. J. Endocr. Soc. 2017, 1, 162–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Burns, K.H.; Viveiros, M.M.; Ren, Y.; Wang, P.; De Mayo, F.J.; Frail, D.E.; Eppig, J.J.; Matzuk, M.M. Roles of NPM2 in chromatin and nucleolar organization in oocytes and embryos. Science 2003, 300, 633–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Kasippillai, T.; MacArthur, D.G.; Kirby, A.; Thomas, B.; Lambalk, C.B.; Daly, M.J.; Welt, C.K. Mutations in eIF4ENIF1 are associated with primary ovarian insufficiency. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 98, 1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Ding, Y.; Chen, S.; Jin, J.; Sun, Y.; Chu, C.; Kee, K.; Xin, M.; Li, L. POI-associated EIF4ENIF1 mutations exhibit impaired translation regulation abilities. Gene 2024, 917, 148456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Ding, Y.; He, Z.; Sha, Y.; Kee, K.; Li, L. Eif4enif1 haploinsufficiency disrupts oocyte mitochondrial dynamics and leads to subfertility. Development 2023, 150, dev202151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Reddi, H.V. Editorial: Genetics and epigenetics in ovarian aging. Front. Endocrinol. 2025, 16, 1555914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Gibney, E.R.; Nolan, C.M. Epigenetics and gene expression. Heredity 2010, 105, 4–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Wang, J.; Sun, X.; Yang, Z.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Ren, R.; Liu, Z.; Yu, D. Epigenetic regulation in premature ovarian failure: A literature review. Front. Physiol. 2023, 13, 998424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Sindik, N.; Pereza, N.; Dević Pavlić, S. Epigenetics of oogenesis. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2025, 311, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Knight, A.K.; Spencer, J.B.; Smith, A.K. DNA methylation as a window into female reproductive aging. Epigenomics 2024, 16, 175–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Garg, A.; Seli, E. Leukocyte telomere length and DNA methylome as biomarkers of ovarian reserve and embryo aneuploidy: The intricate relationship between somatic and reproductive aging. Fertil. Steril. 2024, 121, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Voros, C.; Varthaliti, A.; Mavrogianni, D.; Athanasiou, D.; Athanasiou, A.; Athanasiou, A.; Papahliou, A.; Zografos, C.G.; Topalis, V.; Kondili, P.; et al. Epigenetic Alterations in Ovarian Function and Their Impact on Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Systematic Review. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Yu, X.; Xu, J.; Song, B.; Zhu, R.; Liu, J.; Liu, Y.F.; Ma, Y.J. The role of epigenetics in women’s reproductive health: The impact of environmental factors. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 15, 1399757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Caniçais, C.; Vasconcelos, S.; Santos, F.; Dória, S.; Marques, C.J. DNA methylation mechanisms in the maturing and ageing oocyte. Epigenetics Chromatin 2025, 18, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Wu, Y.; Halverson, G.; Basir, Z.; Strawn, E.; Yan, P.; Guo, S. Aberrant methylation at HOXA10 may be responsible for its aberrant expression in the endometrium of patients with endometriosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005, 193, 371–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Xue, P.; Zhou, W.; Fan, W.; Jiang, J.; Kong, C.; Zhou, W.; Zhou, J.; Huang, X.; Yang, H.; Han, Q.; et al. Increased METTL3-mediated m(6)A methylation inhibits embryo implantation by repressing HOXA10 expression in recurrent implantation failure. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2021, 19, 187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Yang, S.C.; Park, M.; Hong, K.; La, H.; Park, C.; Wang, P.; Li, G.; Chen, Q.; Choi, Y.; DeMayo, F.J.; et al. CFP1 governs uterine epigenetic landscapes to intervene in progesterone responses for uterine physiology and suppression of endometriosis. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 3220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Rocha-Junior, C.V.; Da Broi, M.G.; Miranda-Furtado, C.L.; Navarro, P.A.; Ferriani, R.A.; Meola, J. Progesterone Receptor B (PGR-B) Is Partially Methylated in Eutopic Endometrium from Infertile Women with Endometriosis. Reprod. Sci. 2019, 26, 1568–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Maekawa, R.; Mihara, Y.; Sato, S.; Okada, M.; Tamura, I.; Shinagawa, M.; Shirafuta, Y.; Takagi, H.; Taketani, T.; Tamura, H.; et al. Aberrant DNA methylation suppresses expression of estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) in ovarian endometrioma. J. Ovarian Res. 2019, 12, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Xiong, Y.; Liu, T.; Wang, S.; Chi, H.; Chen, C.; Zheng, J. Cyclophosphamide promotes the proliferation inhibition of mouse ovarian granulosa cells and premature ovarian failure by activating the lncRNA-Meg3-p53-p66Shc pathway. Gene 2017, 596, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Bannister, A.J.; Kouzarides, T. Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res. 2011, 21, 381–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Zhang, T.; He, M.; Zhao, L.; Qin, S.; Zhu, Z.; Du, X.; Zhou, B.; Yang, Y.; Liu, X.; Xia, G.; et al. HDAC6 regulates primordial follicle activation through mTOR signaling pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2021, 12, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. van den Berg, I.M.; Eleveld, C.; van der Hoeven, M.; Birnie, E.; Steegers, E.A.P.; Galjaard, R.; Laven, J.S.E.; van Doorninck, J.H. Defective deacetylation of histone 4 K12 in human oocytes is associated with advanced maternal age and chromosome misalignment. Hum. Reprod. 2011, 26, 1181–1190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Akiyama, T.; Nagata, M.; Aoki, F. Inadequate histone deacetylation during oocyte meiosis causes aneuploidy and embryo death in mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 7339–7344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Borji, A.; Aram, C.; Ziyadloo, F.; Zadeh, M.R.; Rouzbahani, K.A.; Kazemi, M.; Barancheshmeh, M.; Alishvandi, A.; Daraei, A. Gene regulation by non-Coding RNAs in infertility: A mechanistic review. J. Ovarian Res. 2025, 18, 265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Liu, L.; Fang, Y. The Role of Ovarian Granulosa Cells Related-ncRNAs in Ovarian Dysfunctions: Mechanism Research and Clinical Exploration. Reprod. Sci. 2025, 32, 2098–2120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Dong, L.; Wu, H.; Qi, F.; Xu, Y.; Chen, W.; Wang, Y.; Cai, P. Non-coding RNA-mediated granulosa cell dysfunction during ovarian aging: From mechanisms to potential interventions. Noncoding RNA Res. 2025, 12, 102–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Zhao, Q.; Li, X.; Lin, G.; Sui, C.; Zhang, B.; Bai, Y.; Xu, L. The implications of LncRNAs and premature ovarian insufficiency. J. Ovarian Res. 2025, 18, 282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Tu, J.; Chen, Y.; Li, Z.; Yang, H.; Chen, H.; Yu, Z. Long non-coding RNAs in ovarian granulosa cells. J. Ovarian Res. 2020, 13, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Dong, L.; Wu, H.; Qi, F.; Chen, W.; Xu, Y.; Li, M.; Wang, Y.; Yan, R.; Cai, P. LncRNA NEAT1 participates in diminished ovarian reserve by affecting granulosa cell apoptosis and estradiol synthesis via the miR-204-5p/ESR1 axis. J. Ovarian Res. 2025, 18, 102–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Zhao, W.; Dong, L. Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR overexpression improves premature ovarian failure by upregulating Notch-1 expression. Exp. Ther. Med. 2018, 16, 4791–4795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  182. Pankiewicz, K.; Laudański, P.; Issat, T. The Role of Noncoding RNA in the Pathophysiology and Treatment of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 9336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Zhang, J.; Chen, J.; Guo, B.; Fang, Y.; Xu, Z.; Zhan, L.; Cao, Y. Recent Insights into Noncoding RNAs in Primary Ovarian Insufficiency: Focus on Mechanisms and Treatments. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2023, 108, 1898–1908, Correction in J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2023, 108, e651. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgad304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Roovers, E.F.; Rosenkranz, D.; Mahdipour, M.; Han, C.; He, N.; Chuva de Sousa Lopes, S.M.; van der Westerlaken, L.A.J.; Zischler, H.; Butter, F.; Roelen, B.A.J.; et al. Piwi proteins and piRNAs in mammalian oocytes and early embryos. Cell Rep. 2015, 10, 2069–2082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Ding, H.; Qin, X.; Li, Y.; Fang, Y.; Wu, L. Deciphering the role of hsa-piR-775 in primary ovarian insufficiency through FOXG1 modulation. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2025, 41, 2532615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Prather, R.; Simerly, C.; Schatten, G.; Pilch, D.R.; Lobo, S.M.; Marzluff, W.F.; Dean, W.L.; Schultz, G.A. U3 snRNPs and nucleolar development during oocyte maturation, fertilization and early embryogenesis in the mouse: U3 snRNA and snRNPs are not regulated coordinate with other snRNAs and snRNPs. Dev. Biol. 1990, 138, 247–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Zhou, Q.; He, M.; Liu, M.; Sun, G.; Li, J. Emerging roles and therapeutic potential of tRNA-Derived small RNAs in reproductive system diseases: A review. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2025, 13, 1698265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Lambert, M.; Benmoussa, A.; Provost, P. Small Non-Coding RNAs Derived From Eukaryotic Ribosomal RNA. Noncoding RNA 2019, 5, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Zhu, Q.; Kirby, J.A.; Chu, C.; Gou, L. Small Noncoding RNAs in Reproduction and Infertility. Biomedicines 2021, 9, 1884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Sobral, A.F.; Cunha, A.; Costa, I.; Silva-Carvalho, M.; Silva, R.; Barbosa, D.J. Environmental Xenobiotics and Epigenetic Modifications: Implications for Human Health and Disease. J. Xenobiot. 2025, 15, 118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Song, J.; Ma, X.; Li, F.; Liu, J. Exposure to multiple pyrethroid insecticides affects ovarian follicular development via modifying microRNA expression. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 828, 154384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  192. Szymanska, K.J.; Tan, X.; Oktay, K. Unraveling the mechanisms of chemotherapy-induced damage to human primordial follicle reserve: Road to developing therapeutics for fertility preservation and reversing ovarian aging. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 2020, 26, 553–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  193. Legoff, L.; D’Cruz, S.C.; Tevosian, S.; Primig, M.; Smagulova, F. Transgenerational Inheritance of Environmentally Induced Epigenetic Alterations during Mammalian Development. Cells 2019, 8, 1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Nilsson, E.E.; Skinner, M.K. Environmentally Induced Epigenetic Transgenerational Inheritance of Reproductive Disease. Biol. Reprod. 2015, 93, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Achrekar, S.K.; Modi, D.N.; Meherji, P.K.; Patel, Z.M.; Mahale, S.D. Follicle stimulating hormone receptor gene variants in women with primary and secondary amenorrhea. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2010, 27, 317–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Bouilly, J.; Beau, I.; Barraud, S.; Bernard, V.; Azibi, K.; Fagart, J.; Fèvre, A.; Todeschini, A.L.; Veitia, R.A.; Beldjord, C.; et al. Identification of Multiple Gene Mutations Accounts for a new Genetic Architecture of Primary Ovarian Insufficiency. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2016, 101, 4541–4550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Iglesias, C.; Banker, M.; Mahajan, N.; Herrero, L.; Meseguer, M.; Garcia-Velasco, J.A. Ethnicity as a determinant of ovarian reserve: Differences in ovarian aging between Spanish and Indian women. Fertil. Steril. 2014, 102, 244–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Kotlyar, A.M.; Seifer, D.B. Ethnicity/Race and Age-Specific Variations of Serum AMH in Women—A Review. Front. Endocrinol. 2021, 11, 593216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Tal, R.; Seifer, D.B. Potential mechanisms for racial and ethnic differences in antimüllerian hormone and ovarian reserve. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2013, 2013, 818912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Seifer, D.B.; Golub, E.T.; Lambert-Messerlian, G.; Benning, L.; Anastos, K.; Watts, D.H.; Cohen, M.H.; Karim, R.; Young, M.A.; Minkoff, H.; et al. Variations in serum müllerian inhibiting substance between white, black, and Hispanic women. Fertil. Steril. 2009, 92, 1674–1678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Xu, L.; Fang, L.; Gao, M.; Wang, G.; Peng, Y.; Ma, Y.; Pan, F. Association Between the Concentration of Serum Vitamin D and Ovarian Reserve Among Women Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technology. J. Nutr. 2025, 155, 3336–3343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  202. Ames, B.N.; Grant, W.B.; Willett, W.C. Does the High Prevalence of Vitamin D Deficiency in African Americans Contribute to Health Disparities? Nutrients 2021, 13, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Tierney, K.I.; Greil, A.L.; Bell, A.V. Socioeconomic and Racial/Ethnic Inequalities in Infertility Prevalence, Help-Seeking, and Help Received Since 1995. Womens Health Issues 2024, 34, 401–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Greil, A.L.; McQuillan, J.; Shreffler, K.M.; Johnson, K.M.; Slauson-Blevins, K.S. Race-ethnicity and medical services for infertility: Stratified reproduction in a population-based sample of U.S. women. J. Health Soc. Behav. 2011, 52, 493–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Missmer, S.A.; Seifer, D.B.; Jain, T. Cultural factors contributing to health care disparities among patients with infertility in Midwestern United States. Fertil. Steril. 2011, 95, 1943–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Korkidakis, A.; Wang, V.; Sabbagh, R.; Heyward, Q.; Hacker, M.R.; Thornton, K.L.; Penzias, A.S. Determinants of utilization of infertility services by race and ethnicity in a state with a comprehensive infertility mandate. Fertil. Steril. 2025, 123, 709–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Vu, M.H.; Nguyen, A.A.; Alur-Gupta, S. Asian Americans and infertility: Genetic susceptibilities, sociocultural stigma, and access to care. F S Rep. 2021, 3, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Becker, G.; Castrillo, M.; Jackson, R.; Nachtigall, R.D. Infertility among low-income Latinos. Fertil. Steril. 2006, 85, 882–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Kelley, A.S.; Qin, Y.; Marsh, E.E.; Dupree, J.M. Disparities in accessing infertility care in the United States: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013–2016. Fertil Steril 2019, 112, 562–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Seifer, D.B.; Simsek, B.; Wantman, E.; Kotlyar, A.M. Status of racial disparities between black and white women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in the US. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2020, 18, 113, Correction in Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2020, 18, 125. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-020-00683-z. Correction in Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2021, 19, 117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-021-00806-0. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Shapiro, A.J.; Darmon, S.K.; Barad, D.H.; Albertini, D.F.; Gleicher, N.; Kushnir, V.A. Effect of race and ethnicity on utilization and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology in the USA. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2017, 15, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Pastore, L.M.; Young, S.L.; Manichaikul, A.; Baker, V.L.; Wang, X.Q.; Finkelstein, J.S. Distribution of the FMR1 gene in females by race/ethnicity: Women with diminished ovarian reserve versus women with normal fertility (SWAN study). Fertil. Steril. 2017, 107, 205–211.e1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  213. Luborsky, J.L.; Meyer, P.; Sowers, M.F.; Gold, E.B.; Santoro, N. Premature menopause in a multi-ethnic population study of the menopause transition. Hum. Reprod. 2003, 18, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Podfigurna-Stopa, A.; Czyzyk, A.; Grymowicz, M.; Smolarczyk, R.; Katulski, K.; Czajkowski, K.; Meczekalski, B. Premature ovarian insufficiency: The context of long-term effects. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2016, 39, 983–990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Scarbrough, P.M.; Weber, R.P.; Iversen, E.S.; Brhane, Y.; Amos, C.I.; Kraft, P.; Hung, R.J.; Sellers, T.A.; Witte, J.S.; Pharoah, P.; et al. A Cross-Cancer Genetic Association Analysis of the DNA Repair and DNA Damage Signaling Pathways for Lung, Ovary, Prostate, Breast, and Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2016, 25, 193–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Moraes, M.C.S.; Neto, J.B.C.; Menck, C.F.M. DNA repair mechanisms protect our genome from carcinogenesis. Front. Biosci. (Landmark Ed.) 2012, 17, 1362–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Alter, B.P.; Frissora, C.L.; Halpérin, D.S.; Freedman, M.H.; Chitkara, U.; Alvarez, E.; Lynch, L.; Adler-Brecher, B.; Auerbach, A.D. Fanconi’s anaemia and pregnancy. Br. J. Haematol. 1991, 77, 410–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  218. Cunniff, C.; Bassetti, J.A.; Ellis, N.A. Bloom’s Syndrome: Clinical Spectrum, Molecular Pathogenesis, and Cancer Predisposition. Mol. Syndromol. 2017, 8, 4–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Allen-Brady, K.; Moore, B.; Verrilli, L.E.; Alvord, M.A.; Kern, M.; Camp, N.; Kelley, K.; Letourneau, J.; Cannon-Albright, L.; Yandell, M.; et al. Breast Cancer Is Increased in Women with Primary Ovarian Insufficiency. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2025, 110, e1678–e1686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Coelingh Bennink, H.J.T.; Egberts, J.F.M.; Stanczyk, F.Z. Premature ovarian insufficiency and the risk of breast cancer. Hum. Reprod. Open 2025, 2025, hoaf017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Flatt, S.B.; Baillargeon, A.; McClintock, C.; Pudwell, J.; Velez, M.P. Premature ovarian insufficiency in female adolescent and young adult survivors of non-gynecological cancers: A population-based cohort study. Reprod. Health 2023, 20, 4–8, Correction in Reprod. Health 2023, 20, 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-023-01579-y. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  222. Faridi, R.; Rea, A.; Fenollar-Ferrer, C.; O’Keefe, R.T.; Gu, S.; Munir, Z.; Khan, A.A.; Riazuddin, S.; Hoa, M.; Naz, S.; et al. New insights into Perrault syndrome, a clinically and genetically heterogeneous disorder. Hum. Genet. 2022, 141, 805–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  223. Illés, A.; Balicza, P.; Gál, A.; Pentelényi, K.; Csabán, D.; Gézsi, A.; Molnár, V.; Molnár, M.J. Hereditary Parkinson’s disease as a new clinical manifestation of the damaged POLG gene. Orvosi Hetil. 2020, 161, 821–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  224. Huang, Y.; Skwarek-Maruszewska, A.; Horré, K.; Vandewyer, E.; Wolfs, L.; Snellinx, A.; Saito, T.; Radaelli, E.; Corthout, N.; Colombelli, J.; et al. Loss of GPR3 reduces the amyloid plaque burden and improves memory in Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015, 7, 309ra164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  225. Grzechocińska, B.; Warzecha, D.; Wypchło, M.; Ploski, R.; Wielgoś, M. Premature ovarian insufficiency as a variable feature of blepharophimosis, ptosis, and epicanthus inversus syndrome associated with c.223C > T p.(Leu75Phe) FOXL2 mutation: A case report. BMC Med. Genet. 2019, 20, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Waggoner, D.D.; Buist, N.R.; Donnell, G.N. Long-term prognosis in galactosaemia: Results of a survey of 350 cases. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 1990, 13, 802–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Gubbels, C.S.; Land, J.A.; Rubio-Gozalbo, M.E. Fertility and impact of pregnancies on the mother and child in classic galactosemia. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2008, 63, 334–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Capalbo, D.; De Martino, L.; Giardino, G.; Di Mase, R.; Di Donato, I.; Parenti, G.; Vajro, P.; Pignata, C.; Salerno, M. Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy candidiasis ectodermal dystrophy: Insights into genotype-phenotype correlation. Int. J. Endocrinol. 2012, 2012, 353250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Xu, S.; Zhang, X.; Ma, Y.; Xu, S.; Pan, F. The Expression Level of FOXO3a in Patients with Autoimmune Diseases: A Meta-analysis. J. Clin. Rheumatol. 2022, 28, e228–e233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Fei, M.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lu, M.; Cheng, C.; Huang, X.; Zhang, D.; Lu, J.; He, S.; Shen, A. Low expression of Foxo3a is associated with poor prognosis in ovarian cancer patients. Cancer Investig. 2009, 27, 52–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. King, M.; Marks, J.H.; Mandell, J.B.; New York Breast Cancer Study Group. Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science 2003, 302, 643–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Conde, J.; Silva, S.N.; Azevedo, A.P.; Teixeira, V.; Pina, J.E.; Rueff, J.; Gaspar, J.F. Association of common variants in mismatch repair genes and breast cancer susceptibility: A multigene study. BMC Cancer 2009, 9, 344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  233. Qi, X.; Zheng, X.; Zong, B.; Chen, Q.; Zhang, F.; Yang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, J.; Jiang, J. Association between WT1 polymorphisms and susceptibility to breast cancer: Results from a case-control study in a southwestern Chinese population. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2015, 5, 1234–1250. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  234. Sun, H.; Cao, D.; Ma, X.; Yang, J.; Peng, P.; Yu, M.; Zhou, H.; Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Huo, X.; et al. Identification of a Prognostic Signature Associated with DNA Repair Genes in Ovarian Cancer. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. McLaughlin, J.R.; Rosen, B.; Moody, J.; Pal, T.; Fan, I.; Shaw, P.A.; Risch, H.A.; Sellers, T.A.; Sun, P.; Narod, S.A. Long-term ovarian cancer survival associated with mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2013, 105, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Helderman, N.C.; Terlouw, D.; Bonjoch, L.; Golubicki, M.; Antelo, M.; Morreau, H.; van Wezel, T.; Castellví-Bel, S.; Goldberg, Y.; Nielsen, M. Molecular functions of MCM8 and MCM9 and their associated pathologies. iScience 2023, 26, 106737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Verhoef, L.; Bleeker, M.C.G.; Polman, N.; Steenbergen, R.D.M.; Ebisch, R.M.F.; Melchers, W.J.G.; Bekkers, R.L.M.; Molijn, A.C.; Quint, W.G.; van Kemenade, F.; et al. Evaluation of DNA methylation biomarkers ASCL1 and LHX8 on HPV-positive self-collected samples from primary HPV-based screening. Br. J. Cancer 2023, 129, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Golubickaite, I.; Ugenskiene, R.; Ziliene, E.; Beniusyte, J.; Inciura, A.; Poskiene, L.; Juozaityte, E. POLG Gene Variants in Cervical Cancer Patients and Their Associations with Clinical and Pathomorphological Tumor Characteristics. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 1838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Huang, B.; Lin, M.; Lu, L.; Chen, W.; Tan, J.; Zhao, J.; Cao, Z.; Zhu, X.; Lin, J. Identification of mini-chromosome maintenance 8 as a potential prognostic marker and its effects on proliferation and apoptosis in gastric cancer. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2020, 24, 14415–14425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Lv, M.; Zhang, S.; Dong, Y.; Cao, L.; Guo, S. PolG Inhibits Gastric Cancer Glycolysis and Viability by Suppressing PKM2 Phosphorylation. Cancer Manag. Res. 2021, 13, 1559–1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Ratnakumar, A.; Zimmerman, S.E.; Jordan, B.A.; Mar, J.C. Estrogen activates Alzheimer’s disease genes. Alzheimer’s Dement 2019, 5, 906–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  242. Pal, U.; Halder, P.; Ray, A.; Sarkar, S.; Datta, S.; Ghosh, P.; Ghosh, S. The etiology of Down syndrome: Maternal MCM9 polymorphisms increase risk of reduced recombination and nondisjunction of chromosome 21 during meiosis I within oocyte. PLoS Genet. 2021, 17, e1009462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  243. Faubion, S.S.; Kuhle, C.L.; Shuster, L.T.; Rocca, W.A. Long-term health consequences of premature or early menopause and considerations for management. Climacteric 2015, 18, 483–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  244. van Zwol-Janssens, C.; Louwers, Y.V.; Laven, J.S.E.; Schipper, J.; Jiskoot, G. Depressive symptoms in women with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI): A cross-sectional observational study. Menopause 2025, 32, 1129–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Tian, Y.; Zhang, X.; Xin, Z.; Li, C.R.; Zhang, F.; Deng, H.; Yang, X. Premature Ovarian Insufficiency Is Associated with Increased Risk of Depression, Anxiety, and Poor Life Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Alpha Psychiatry 2024, 25, 132–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Sun, J.; Fan, Y.; Guo, Y.; Pan, H.; Zhang, C.; Mao, G.; Huang, Y.; Li, B.; Gu, T.; Wang, L.; et al. Chronic and Cumulative Adverse Life Events in Women with Primary Ovarian Insufficiency: An Exploratory Qualitative Study. Front. Endocrinol. 2022, 13, 856044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. McDonald, I.R.; Welt, C.K.; Dwyer, A.A. Health-related quality of life in women with primary ovarian insufficiency: A scoping review of the literature and implications for targeted interventions. Hum. Reprod. 2022, 37, 2817–2830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Singer, D.; Mann, E.; Hunter, M.S.; Pitkin, J.; Panay, N. The silent grief: Psychosocial aspects of premature ovarian failure. Climacteric 2011, 14, 428–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Xi, D.; Chen, B.; Tao, H.; Xu, Y.; Chen, G. The risk of depressive and anxiety symptoms in women with premature ovarian insufficiency: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Womens Ment. Health 2023, 26, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Newson, L.R.; Lewis, R. Premature ovarian insufficiency: Why is it not being diagnosed enough in primary care? Br. J. Gen. Pract. 2018, 68, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Hammond, J.; Marczak, M. Women’s experiences of premature ovarian insufficiency: A thematic synthesis. Psychol. Health 2025, 40, 192–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  252. Alzubaidi, N.H.; Chapin, H.L.; Vanderhoof, V.H.; Calis, K.A.; Nelson, L.M. Meeting the needs of young women with secondary amenorrhea and spontaneous premature ovarian failure. Obstet. Gynecol. 2002, 99, 720–725. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  253. Driscoll, M.A.; Davis, M.C.; Aiken, L.S.; Yeung, E.W.; Sterling, E.W.; Vanderhoof, V.; Calis, K.A.; Popat, V.; Covington, S.N.; Nelson, L.M. Psychosocial Vulnerability, Resilience Resources, and Coping with Infertility: A Longitudinal Model of Adjustment to Primary Ovarian Insufficiency. Ann. Behav. Med. 2016, 50, 272–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  254. Sterling, E.W.; Nelson, L.M. From victim to survivor to thriver: Helping women with primary ovarian insufficiency integrate recovery, self-management, and wellness. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2011, 29, 353–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Johnston-Ataata, K.; Flore, J.; Kokanović, R.; Hickey, M.; Teede, H.; Boyle, J.A.; Vincent, A. ‘My relationships have changed because I’ve changed’: Biographical disruption, personal relationships and the formation of an early menopausal subjectivity. Sociol. Health Illn. 2020, 42, 1516–1531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Reimann, G.E.; Bernad Perman, M.M.; Ho, P.; Parks, R.A.; Comis, L.E. Psychosocial Characteristics of Women with a Delayed Diagnosis of Turner Syndrome. J. Pediatr. 2018, 199, 206–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Boro, H. Addressing the Emotional, Social and Ethical Aspects of Premature Ovarian Insufficiency (POI): A Personal Narrative. Indian. J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2025, 29, 168–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Xu, Y.; Fu, J.; Hong, Z.; Zeng, D.; Guo, C.; Li, P.; Wu, J. Psychological stressors involved in the pathogenesis of premature ovarian insufficiency and potential intervention measures. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2024, 40, 2360085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Long, P.; Wang, L.; Tan, H.; Quan, R.; Hu, Z.; Zeng, M.; Deng, Z.; Huang, H.; Greenbaum, J.; Deng, H.; et al. Oligogenic basis of premature ovarian insufficiency: An observational study. J. Ovarian Res. 2024, 17, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Hirano, M.; Onodera, T.; Takasaki, K.; Takahashi, Y.; Ichinose, T.; Nishida, H.; Hiraike, H.; Nagasaka, K. Ovarian aging: Pathophysiology and recent developments in maintaining ovarian reserve. Front. Endocrinol. 2025, 16, 1619516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Zhao, X.; Shi, W.; Li, Z.; Zhang, W. Linking reproductive tract microbiota to premature ovarian insufficiency: Pathophysiological mechanisms and therapies. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2024, 166, 104325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Witham, M.; Hengel, S.R. The role of RAD51 regulators and variants in primary ovarian insufficiency, endometriosis, and polycystic ovary syndrome. NAR Mol. Med. 2024, 1, ugae010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Xinyue, W.; Hongli, L.; Chunhui, G.; Jibing, C.; Hua, Y. Potential MiRNA therapies for premature ovarian failure: New challenges and opportunities. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2025, 16, 364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. Zhang, X.; Wang, S. Current status and future prospects of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes therapy for premature ovarian insufficiency. J. Ovarian Res. 2025, 18, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Huang, Q.; Chen, S.; Chen, J.; Shi, Q.; Lin, S. Therapeutic options for premature ovarian insufficiency: An updated review. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2022, 20, 28, Correction in Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2023, 21, 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12958-023-01133-2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  266. Yang, M.; Lin, L.; Sha, C.; Li, T.; Zhao, D.; Wei, H.; Chen, Q.; Liu, Y.; Chen, X.; Xu, W.; et al. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal miR-144-5p improves rat ovarian function after chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure by targeting PTEN. Lab. Investig. 2020, 100, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Sun, B.; Ma, Y.; Wang, F.; Hu, L.; Sun, Y. miR-644-5p carried by bone mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes targets regulation of p53 to inhibit ovarian granulosa cell apoptosis. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2019, 10, 360–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Liu, Y.; Li, C. Hormone Therapy and Biological Aging in Postmenopausal Women. JAMA Netw. Open 2024, 7, e2430839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Day, F.R.; Ruth, K.S.; Thompson, D.J.; Lunetta, K.L.; Pervjakova, N.; Chasman, D.I.; Stolk, L.; Finucane, H.K.; Sulem, P.; Bulik-Sullivan, B.; et al. Large-scale genomic analyses link reproductive aging to hypothalamic signaling, breast cancer susceptibility and BRCA1-mediated DNA repair. Nat. Genet. 2015, 47, 1294–1303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Laven, J.S.E.; Visser, J.A.; Uitterlinden, A.G.; Vermeij, W.P.; Hoeijmakers, J.H.J. Menopause: Genome stability as new paradigm. Maturitas 2016, 92, 15–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Hu, Y.; Wang, W.; Ma, W.; Wang, W.; Ren, W.; Wang, S.; Fu, F.; Li, Y. Impact of psychological stress on ovarian function: Insights, mechanisms and intervention strategies (Review). Int. J. Mol. Med. 2025, 55, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Pathogenesis and Etiology of Primary Ovarian Insufficiency. (A) Accelerated Ovarian Aging Trajectory. Physiological ovarian reserve (green) supports reproductive function until natural menopause (~51 years). Pathogenic insults, including germline variants and altered epigenetics, accelerate follicular atresia, shifting the trajectory (red dashed line) toward premature ovarian exhaustion before age 40, resulting in POI. (B) Etiological Landscape. Genetic defects account for ~20–25% of POI cases, autoimmune factors for ~20–30%, and environmental/iatrogenic causes for ~5–10%. The idiopathic fraction (~40–50%) is depicted as a gradient interface to reflect ongoing reclassification of cases as genetic, polygenic, or epigenetic with emerging genomic data.
Figure 1. Pathogenesis and Etiology of Primary Ovarian Insufficiency. (A) Accelerated Ovarian Aging Trajectory. Physiological ovarian reserve (green) supports reproductive function until natural menopause (~51 years). Pathogenic insults, including germline variants and altered epigenetics, accelerate follicular atresia, shifting the trajectory (red dashed line) toward premature ovarian exhaustion before age 40, resulting in POI. (B) Etiological Landscape. Genetic defects account for ~20–25% of POI cases, autoimmune factors for ~20–30%, and environmental/iatrogenic causes for ~5–10%. The idiopathic fraction (~40–50%) is depicted as a gradient interface to reflect ongoing reclassification of cases as genetic, polygenic, or epigenetic with emerging genomic data.
Ijms 27 01353 g001
Figure 2. The Multifaceted Psychosocial Burden of POI. A concept map illustrating the emotional and social consequences of a POI diagnosis, highlighting the key domains of patient impact and underscoring the need for tailored psychosocial interventions.
Figure 2. The Multifaceted Psychosocial Burden of POI. A concept map illustrating the emotional and social consequences of a POI diagnosis, highlighting the key domains of patient impact and underscoring the need for tailored psychosocial interventions.
Ijms 27 01353 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abujaber, R.; Henry-Smith, C.; Sharma, S. From Genes to Lives: Integrating the Complexities of Primary Ovarian Insufficiency. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27031353

AMA Style

Abujaber R, Henry-Smith C, Sharma S. From Genes to Lives: Integrating the Complexities of Primary Ovarian Insufficiency. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(3):1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27031353

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abujaber, Rand, Charnae Henry-Smith, and Sudha Sharma. 2026. "From Genes to Lives: Integrating the Complexities of Primary Ovarian Insufficiency" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 3: 1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27031353

APA Style

Abujaber, R., Henry-Smith, C., & Sharma, S. (2026). From Genes to Lives: Integrating the Complexities of Primary Ovarian Insufficiency. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(3), 1353. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27031353

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop