You are currently viewing a new version of our website. To view the old version click .
MDPIMDPI
Search all articles
Molecules
Download PDF
  • Review
  • Open Access

4 February 2021

Development and Effects of Influenza Antiviral Drugs

,
,
,
,
,
and
Key Laboratory of Fujian-Taiwan Animal Pathogen Biology, College of Animal Sciences (College of Bee Science), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou 350002, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules2021, 26(4), 810;https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26040810
This article belongs to the Special Issue Successfully Fighting Viruses with Love for Chemistry: A Commemorative Issue in Honor of Prof. Dr. Erik De Clercq on the Occasion of His 80th Anniversary
Version Notes
Order Reprints

Abstract

Influenza virus is a highly contagious zoonotic respiratory disease that causes seasonal outbreaks each year and unpredictable pandemics occasionally with high morbidity and mortality rates, posing a great threat to public health worldwide. Besides the limited effect of vaccines, the problem is exacerbated by the lack of drugs with strong antiviral activity against all flu strains. Currently, there are two classes of antiviral drugs available that are chemosynthetic and approved against influenza A virus for prophylactic and therapeutic treatment, but the appearance of drug-resistant virus strains is a serious issue that strikes at the core of influenza control. There is therefore an urgent need to develop new antiviral drugs. Many reports have shown that the development of novel bioactive plant extracts and microbial extracts has significant advantages in influenza treatment. This paper comprehensively reviews the development and effects of chemosynthetic drugs, plant extracts, and microbial extracts with influenza antiviral activity, hoping to provide some references for novel antiviral drug design and promising alternative candidates for further anti-influenza drug development.

1. Background

Influenza virus is a negative-sense, single-stranded RNA virus belonging to the Orthomyxovirus family, influenza virus genus. Influenza viruses can be classified according to their antigenicity into four types—A, B, C and D []. Of these, influenza A viruses are the most pathogenic to humans and have a wide range of hosts. Influenza A virus has 18 different hemagglutinin (HA) subtypes (H1–H18) and 11 different neuraminidase (NA) subtypes (N1–N11), which together define the influenza A virus subtype [,,]. The host range of influenza B virus is relatively limited and its pathogenicity to humans is relatively weak. According to epidemiological investigation, no influenza B virus pandemic has ensued so far [,,,]. Type C influenza virus causes only mild respiratory disease in humans, while type D influenza virus does not appear to be pathogenic to humans [,]. The most important characteristic of influenza virus is its variability due to its segmental RNA genome contributing to antigen variation, which makes it extremely difficult to develop vaccines and drugs [,,].
Influenza A virus causes seasonal epidemics worldwide every year and has been responsible for several global outbreaks in history, such as the 1918 Spanish flu and the 2009 H1N1 pandemic [,]. Seasonal transmission of influenza virus varies according to geographical location, population size, and population movement in different climatic regions. Understanding the seasonal transmission of influenza virus in different climatic regions can provide theoretical support for optimizing the efficiency of influenza vaccination programs []. The annual financial impact of seasonal influenza in China and the world is very large, but not as large as the financial impact of influenza pandemics, such as the worldwide H5N1 and H1N1 outbreaks, which cost countries affected by the influenza virus more than $80 billion in financial losses []. Therefore, it can be said that the influenza virus is a serious threat to the safety of public health. Thus far, the World Health Organization still believes that vaccines are the best way to prevent and control an influenza pandemic; however, influenza viruses constantly undergo genetic changes and require vaccines that match the circulating influenza strains to be effective, so seasonal influenza vaccines have to be modified annually [,,,]. In addition, the application of vaccines has also been limited due to the side effects and storage difficulty []. Therefore, the study of antiviral drugs is increasingly imperative [,]. In this paper, the development and effects of anti-influenza drugs from different sources are reviewed in order to provide new ideas for the prevention and control of influenza in future.

2. Influenza Virus Invades Host Mechanisms

When influenza virus invades host cells, the HA protein of the virus first binds to cellular receptors with α-2,3-linked or α-2,6-linked sialic acid. After that, influenza virus is internalized through a variety of endocytic pathways, including cypermethrin-dependent and non-cypermethrin-dependent pathways [,,]. The cation channel of the M2 ion channel protein of the virus then opens, reducing the pH value inside the virus, allowing the viral envelope to fuse with the endosomal membrane in a low pH-dependent manner, and the viral genome is released into the cytoplasm, where it is further transported to the nucleus to begin genome replication [,]. During this process, influenza virus HA, NA, M2, and vRNP complex play critical roles, making them potential targets for the development of anti-influenza drugs. HA is a membrane protein that exists on the surface of the virus and is composed of HA1 and HA2 [,,]. Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus strains (H5 and H7 subtypes) have the ability to infect humans due to their HA receptor binding site (RBS) mutation, thereby enhancing the affinity of the virus to the cell surface receptor (α-2,6-linked sialic acid) [,]. In addition to binding to host cells, the second major function of HA is to mediate viral and cell membrane fusion [,]. This fusion process is essential for the introduction of the viral genome into cells [,,]. Indeed, new antiviral drugs have been developed using HA as an antiviral target [].
As an important weapon for influenza virus to destroy host cell receptor, NA can prevent the accumulation of virus particles on the surface of host cells caused by the adsorption function of HA, and can promote the release of virus progeny particles, which also play an important role in the process of influenza virus infection of host cells [,]. HA-mediated attachment and NA-mediated release of influenza viruses need to keep a balance in order to allow productive influenza virus infection [,,]. NA inhibitors are extensively used in the treatment and prophylaxis of influenza virus infection presently.
The vRNP complex consists of eight negative-sense, single-stranded RNAs, nuclear protein, and RNA polymerases, which are the basic units of influenza virus replication []. The viral proteins that make up vRNP all have nuclear localization sequences (NLS). vRNP is assembled in the cytoplasm and then enters the nucleus through nuclear localization to complete viral replication and transcription [,]. The influenza virus polymerase plays a major role in the replication and transcription of influenza virus. Polymerase synthesizes viral mRNA via a unique “cap snapping” mechanism using short-end primers from cellular transcripts []. Interference with the activity of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) is an effective means to reduce viral resistance and inhibit viral replication, and viral RdRP is one of the most promising targets for the development of novel influenza antiviral drugs [,,,,]. As a non-structural protein of the influenza virus, NS1 protein can regulate the viral life cycle, the immune function of the host, and play an auxiliary role in the process of influenza virus infection of host cells []. It has been reported that compounds A9 and A22 inhibit the replication of influenza virus and the function of NS1 by blocking the interaction between CPSF30 and the NS1 effector domain, and the NS1 protein is also expected to be an important target for the development of new influenza antiviral drugs [,,]. The replication cycle of influenza virus and targets of anti-influenza drugs are depicted in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Replication cycle of influenza virus and targets of anti-influenza drugs. (a) Influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) binds to sialylated host cell receptors, and then is internalised into endosomes through multiple endocytosis pathways. (b) Acidification of the endosome leads to activation of the M2 proton channel and virion acidification, resulting in virus uncoating and the release of viral genome into the cytoplasm, where it is further transported to the nucleus to begin genome replication. (c) In the nucleus, influenza virus begins to synthesize viral mRNAs. (d) HA, neuraminidase (NA) and M2 are processed in the Golgi body and the endoplasmic reticulum, and then transported to the cell surface. (e) Influenza virus polymerase can synthesize both viral mRNAs and vRNAs. vRNAs are first converted into positive-stranded cRNAs, and then new vRNAs can be synthesized using cRNAs as templates. (f) Viral proteins and genomic RNA are transported to the cell surface to assemble progeny viruses. Then, influenza virus neuraminidase (NA) cuts off the HA-receptor bond to allow progeny viruses to be released from the surface of the infected cell and proceed to infect new cells. The sites of action of antiviral drugs are shown in red.

3. Development and Effects of Influenza Antiviral Drugs

Influenza viruses pose a significant threat to public health, strongly associated with their high variability and recombination [,,]. The known influenza virus strains constantly mutate and the genomic segments may undergo reassortment to form new virus subtypes [,]. Because of the variable nature of the viruses themselves, the development of vaccines and drugs is facing great challenges. Nevertheless, research has led to the development of two main types of compound drugs in clinical treatment of influenza virus—NA inhibitors and M2 channel ion blockers [,]. NA inhibitors can inhibit the NA activity of influenza viruses, weaken the release of influenza virus particles from infected cells, and thus effectively inhibit the replication of the viruses. Among them, the most representative NA inhibitors are oseltamivir, peramivir, and zanamivir [,]. M2 channel ion blockers mainly inhibit viral replication by blocking the hydrogen ion channel activity of M2 protein of influenza virus. Representative drugs are amantadine and rimantadine [].
Because of resistance problems faced with the influenza virus for NA inhibitors and M2 channel blocker drugs, research has focused on the influenza virus RNA polymerase as a drug target due to its important role in regulating influenza virus replication and transcription and the highly conserved RNA polymerases between different strains []. There are multiple potential antiviral drugs that could lead to effective antiviral activity, including ribavirin and favipiravir []. In addition, because of the overuse of compound drugs, a large number of drug-resistant strains have emerged. Natural antiviral drugs are also being explored; in clinical application, traditional Chinese medicine has shown ideal antiviral activity for drug-resistant strains, without the development of drug resistance problems. These medicines include honeysuckle, Radix isatidis, Terminalia chebula, puerarin, and Yinqiao powder, among others.

3.1. Development and Effects of Chemical Synthesis Drugs on Influenza Virus Resistance

Oseltamivir has been widely used in the treatment of influenza virus. Oseltamivir can inhibit the replication of influenza virus by binding to the NA active site as competitive inhibitors [,]. However, due to the evolution of influenza virus and the abuse of influenza antiviral drugs, a large number of drug-resistant strains have emerged, for example, the H274Y/H1N1 influenza virus, which is the culprit leading to the H1N1 pandemic, causing huge economic losses [,,]. Therefore, the development of new drugs is urgent. In addition, adverse effects after the clinical use of oseltamivir, such as inhibiting the production of viral antigens, leading to the reduction of acquired antiviral humoral immunity and increasing the probability of re-infection [], have been observed. In order to reduce the impact of adverse effects, Takahashi et al. demonstrated that Lactobacillus bulgaricus OLL1073R-1YC has the ability to stimulate host humoral immunity against influenza virus and can assist oseltamivir in the treatment of influenza virus []. L-NMMA, nitazoxanide, etc., have emerged to synergistically fight against influenza viruses in order to make the use of drugs more efficient []. L-NMMA is a nitric oxide inhibitor that can be used in collaboration with oseltamivir in the treatment of the H1N1 influenza virus. Smee et al. demonstrated, through animal experiments, that the synergistic effect of the two drugs can significantly reduce the mortality []. Nitazoxanide is a thiazole compound that works in conjunction with NA inhibitors against influenza viruses. Different from other influenza antiviral drugs, it does not inhibit the expression of viral proteins but inhibits the replication of influenza virus by blocking HA terminal glycosylation and intracellular transport []. An ongoing clinical trial has shown the significant antiviral activity of Nitazoxanide against a wide range of human and avian IAVs as well as various non-influenza respiratory viruses, indicating a wide and bright application foreground for the treatment of respiratory infections [,]. Some drugs have also been developed to target current strains resistant to oseltamivir, such as pyridine-containing oseltamivir derivative compounds 23B and sodium baicalin. Compound 23B had a significant inhibitory effect on H5N1 NA as well as a strong inhibitory effect on oseltamivir-resistant A/Liaoning Zhenxin/1109/2010 (H1N1) virus []. Like oseltamivir, sodium baicalin is also an inhibitor of viral NA. Jin et al. confirmed that sodium baicalin has an obvious inhibitory ability against the H1N1-H275Y virus strain that is oseltamivir-resistant. However, the use of sodium baicalin in clinical practice is hindered because of its poor water-solubility [].
The most critical step for influenza virus to infect the host is the interaction between the viral membrane protein HA and the host cell surface receptor mediating the entry of the virus, and certain drugs can interact with the HA protein to alter the biological structure and function of HA, thus preventing the virus from infecting the host [,]. As a derivative of oleanolic acid that possesses notable antiviral activity, OA-10 also has a significant inhibitory effect on influenza virus, including H5N1, PR8 (H1N1), H9N2, and H3N2 []. It acts by blocking the conformational changes of the HA2 subunit required for viral–endosomal membrane fusion, which is necessary for the release of viral genome from its protective capsid to enable the nucleic acid to be transported into the nucleus, thereby inhibiting the replication of influenza virus [].
When M2 channel blockers are widely used in clinical practice, they also face the same disadvantages as NA inhibitors such as oseltamivir, producing drug-resistant strains such as the S31N influenza strains that are prevalent in influenza viruses []. The replication process of influenza virus requires the activity of the M2 ion channel; amantadine has the ability to inhibit the replication of influenza virus by inhibiting the activity of the M2 protein [,,]. However, due to the mutation of the 31st amino acid in the M2 protein, amantadine loses its ability to inhibit the virus and cannot be used in the clinic [,,]. Therefore, addressing drug resistance is an important issue in the research and development of new drugs.
The emergence of RNA polymerase inhibitors, such as ribavirin and favipiravir, has an exciting impact on the spread and drug resistance of influenza viruses []. Ribavirin, a nucleoside compound, has a wide antiviral activity range, and has a good inhibitory ability against A/Vietnam/1203/04 (H5N1) virus and A/Turkey/15/06 (H5N1) virus []. Its mechanism involves a reduction in the content of GTP in cells by competitively inhibiting IMP dehydrogenase and a reduction in the replication ability of influenza virus by inhibiting the function of influenza RNA polymerase []. Of note, the drug is particularly effective against the H5N1 influenza virus and its combination with oseltamivir is more effective than the single drug []. However, the anti-influenza virus effect of ribavirin was only performed in a mouse model, and its effect in human clinical trials was less clear []. As an emerging antiviral drug against influenza virus, favipiravir has good antiviral ability against the whole RNA virus, and has been licensed as an anti-influenza drug in Japan [,]. It acts by inhibiting the activity of influenza virus RNA polymerase and reducing its conservatism, so that the virus gene mutates []. There have been no reports of drug resistance to favipiravir. There are two hypotheses for this—first, it can increase the deleterious mutation rate of the entire genome of the virus and lead to virus extinction; second, the powerful antiviral ability of favipiravir enables the influenza virus to be destroyed before it mutates []. Ormond et al. demonstrated that the combination of favipiravir and oseltamivir could explore potential genes for resistance to oseltamivir strains []. Because of its nature, favipiravir is likely to become a core drug during the next pandemic and stockpiling of novel drugs is now an important strategy for dealing with future influenza pandemics []. In addition, Baloxavir marboxil, which has been approved for the treatment of uncomplicated influenza in otherwise healthy and high-risk patients in numerous countries, can potently inhibit influenza virus production by selectively blocking the catalytic center of polymerase acid (PA) protein in the RNA polymerase complex. However, amino acid substitutions such as I38N/R, E23K/G, A37T, and E199G in the PA subunit bring about new challenges for effectiveness of the drug [,,,,].
There are also drugs that have multiple functions, such as leflunomide. As a well-known anti-inflammatory drug primarily used for treating rheumatoid arthritis, leflunomide also shows influenza antiviral activity []. Wang et al. found that leflunomide’s metabolite A77 1726 has an inhibitory effect on JAK2 activity. JAK2 not only regulates the function of immune cells, but also plays a significant role in the process of influenza virus replication, indicating that the inhibition of JAK2 activity by drugs is directly related to their antiviral activity []. The details of chemical synthesis drugs with anti-influenza activity are listed in Table 1, and their molecular structures are shown in Figure 2.
Table 1. List of chemical synthesis drugs.
Figure 2. The molecular structures of chemical synthesis drugs.

3.2. Development and Effects of Plant Extracts on Influenza Virus Resistance

Due to the limitations in the development of compound drugs, the combination of natural drugs of medicinal plants with empirical knowledge provides a new platform for the development of new antivirals []. Honeysuckle, Radix isatidis, T. chebula and puerarin, as representatives of natural drugs, have had a long history in treating influenza virus in China [] (Table 2). Studies have shown that honeysuckle has many antiviral active extracts, such as acids extract, flavonoids extract, honeysuckle acids-flavonoids mixture, etc. []. In particular, honeysuckle acids-flavonoids mixture showed the strongest antiviral activity against H1N1, H3N2 and the oseltamivir-resistant strain H1N1-H275Y, the flavonoids extract exerted the strongest inhibitory effect on H7N9 influenza virus in vitro, while honeysuckle acids extract was demonstrated to exhibit the most potent therapeutic efficacy against H1N1 influenza virus infection in vivo []. The mechanism underlying the inhibitory effects of the extracts on influenza viruses is similar to that of oseltamivir [].
Table 2. List of plant extracts.
The polysaccharide extract of Radix isatidis has strong influenza antiviral activity and ideal effects on the inhibition of H1N1 and H9N2 influenza viruses []. Isatidis polysaccharide has a strong inhibitory effect on the expression of host TLR3 protein, which further reduces the expression of virus-induced pro-inflammatory cytokines and the inflammatory response []. As a virus pattern recognition receptor, TLR3 plays a major role in the process of virus infection. It can not only stimulate the production of interferons and some antiviral substances but also induce the spread of the virus, leading to deterioration of the disease [,].
In addition, T. chebula, as a common Chinese medicine, has a strong influenza antiviral activity. Li et al. determined that chebulagic acid and chebulinic acid in T. chebula Retz had strong influenza antiviral activity with IC50 values of 1.36 ± 0.36 µM and 1.86 ± 0.98 µM, respectively []. It acts by inhibiting the activity of virus NA protein and blocking the release of virus progeny particles to inhibit virus replication []. Puerarin is a flavonoid extracted from Pueraria lobata, which has many functions, including a significant effect against influenza virus, especially against H1N1 influenza virus []. According to animal experiments using a mouse model, Puerarin exhibited effective antiviral activity and had shown no significant side effects after two months of treatment []. It acts by inhibiting the NA activity of influenza virus and blocking the nuclear output of the nuclear protein []. Some plants that are not included in traditional Chinese medicine, such as pomegranate and ginger, can also exert antiviral activity. Punicalagin, a broad-spectrum influenza inhibitor derived from pomegranate, has an inhibitory effect on different subtypes of influenza virus by inhibiting the NA protein activity of influenza virus and then blocking the release of progeny virus []. It is worth noting that Punicalagin also had a significant inhibitory effect on oseltamivir-resistant strains []. In addition, the ginger extract Gingerenone A acts as a dual inhibitor of JAK2 and p70S6 kinase (S6K1) to inhibit influenza virus replication by inhibiting JAK2 activity and interfering with viral assembly [].
As a mixture of various plant extracts, Chinese herbal formulae, such as Gegen Qinlian soup, Lianhua-qingwen capsule, and Yinqiao powder, have been shown to have potent antiviral activity in the clinic [,,] (Table 3).
Table 3. List of Traditional Chinese Medicine mixtures.
It has been reported that Gegen Qinlian decoction can downregulate the expression of some signaling pathway factors and the activity of NF-κB, inhibiting the expression of inflammatory factors and the cytokine storm, affecting the differentiation of CD4+ T cells and thereby increasing the antiviral immunity of the host [,]. The Gegen Qinlian decoction activates the host’s homeostatic inflammatory response, limits immunopathological damage, and improves clinical symptoms [,]. Similarly, Lianhua-qingwen is a traditional Chinese medicine prescription for the treatment of respiratory diseases that can relieve clinical symptoms such as fever, cough, sore throat, and fatigue and has a broad-spectrum inhibitory effect on influenza virus []. Lianhua-qingwen acts by inhibiting the nuclear output of virus RNP by inhibiting the activity of NF-κB as well as by regulating the immune response after virus infection []. Yinqiao powder also has a good inhibitory effect on H1N1 influenza virus and can relieve respiratory symptoms such as cough, headache, fever and so on. It can be used in combination with the Xijiao Dihuang decoction to enhance its antiviral activity []. Yinqiao powder exerts influenza antiviral activity by regulating the TLR7/NF-κB signaling pathway []. It can also modulate the dysregulated miRNA and mRNA involved in the ERK/JNK-AP-1, IFN-β/STAT signaling pathways, thus improving the host’s antiviral immunity and reducing the damage induced by the inflammatory response [].

3.3. Development and Role of Microbial Metabolites in Influenza Virus Resistance

Besides the plant extracts with good influenza antiviral activity, a large number of effective active antiviral substances have been found in microbial metabolites (Table 4).
Table 4. List of microbial extracts.
The metabolites of actinomycetes have always played an important role in the discovery of new drugs, and most antibiotic drugs are derived from them []. Recently, it has been found that the metabolites of actinomycetes also have good antiviral ability []. For example, Streptomyces sp (SMU-03) found in Yunnan can produce an antiviral substance, dichloromethane extract (DCME), with a very good inhibitory effect on H1N1 and H3N2 influenza viruses []. DCME can block the binding of viral HA protein to the cell surface receptors, thus preventing the virus from entering host cells to produce an antiviral effect []. In addition, an extract of extreme thermophilic actinomycetes was found to have a broad-spectrum effect against influenza virus in the harsh environment of Kazakhstan []. Berezin et al. proved that the extracts of extremophilic actinomycetes strains K-192-2S, K-340-2S, and K-362-2N had significant antiviral activity through the inhibition of NA activity of all tested strains of influenza A virus, indicating that their commercial value may be higher than that of oseltamivir [].
In recent years, metabolites of marine organisms have also attracted extensive attention owing to their greater diversity in structure and function compared to terrestrial organisms []. Actinomycetes are widely distributed in the ocean and can produce metabolites with diverse biological activities. For example, the sea Verrucosispora is a rare actinomycetes that can secrete a variety of biologically active metabolites, such as Compounds 1–3, with a good inhibitory effect on H1N1 influenza virus []. In addition, Wang et al. isolated a new sesterterpene called L435-3 from the phytopathogenic fungus Bipolaris oryzae and proved that L435-3 has strong antiviral activity against influenza, including against WSN and PR8 viruses [,]. L435-3 acts by inhibiting the replication of influenza virus through increasing the production of type III interferon and some interferon-stimulated genes (ISGs) in the host, thus enhancing the antiviral ability of the host [].

4. Conclusions

Although the development of influenza antiviral drugs has greatly reduced the mortality rate, influenza virus still poses a great threat to public health worldwide due to the emergence of synthetic drug-resistant strains. Therefore, new drugs that do not induce resistance and with unique pharmacological activity need to be discovered and developed. Natural antiviral drugs have many advantages over synthetic drugs, mainly manifested in a lower resistance and mild adverse clinical reactions. Further research and development and more appropriate management of traditional Chinese medicines are required such that these products can be accepted by medical systems worldwide. Meanwhile, more attention should be paid to microbial metabolites for the discovery of new antiviral drugs with high efficiency and safety. Importantly, a better understanding of the mechanisms by which plant extracts and microbial metabolites achieve the anti-influenza action will be beneficial to the development and improvement of antiviral drugs. We have herein summarized the development and effects of three kinds of anti-influenza virus drugs, hoping to provide new ideas for future drug design and development of innovative drugs.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.W., H.Y.; writing—original draft preparation H.Y.; writing—review and editing, H.Y., N.J., W.S., X.C., S.L., J.-L.C., and S.W.; visualization, H.Y.; supervision, S.W., N.J., W.S., and J.-L.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0500205, 2018YFD0500100), Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China (2020J06016), Major Science and Technology Program of Fujian Province of China (2019NZ09002), Program for Outstanding Youth Scientific Research of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (xjq201605).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Durães-Carvalho, R.; Salemi, M. In-depth phylodynamics, evolutionary analysis and in silico predictions of universal epitopes of Influenza A subtypes and Influenza B viruses. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2018, 121, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huang, S.S.H.; Banner, D.; Paquette, S.G.; Leon, A.J.; Kelvin, A.A.; Kelvin, D.J. Pathogenic influenza B virus in the ferret model establishes lower respiratory tract infection. J. Gen. Virol. 2014, 95, 2127–2139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bodewes, R.; Morick, D.; de Mutsert, G.; Osinga, N.; Bestebroer, T.; van der Vliet, S.; Smits, S.L.; Kuiken, T.; Rimmelzwaan, G.F.; Fouchier, R.A.; et al. Recurring influenza B virus infections in seals. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2013, 19, 511–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Mäkelä, S.M.; Österlund, P.; Westenius, V.; Latvala, S.; Diamond, M.S.; Gale, M., Jr.; Julkunen, I. RIG-I Signaling Is Essential for Influenza B Virus-Induced Rapid Interferon Gene Expression. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 12014–12025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sharabi, S.; Drori, Y.; Micheli, M.; Friedman, N.; Orzitzer, S.; Bassal, R.; Glatman-Freedman, A.; Shohat, T.; Mendelson, E.; Hindiyeh, M.; et al. Epidemiological and Virological Characterization of Influenza B Virus Infections. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0161195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  6. Ping, J.; Lopes, T.J.; Neumann, G.; Kawaoka, Y. Development of high-yield influenza B virus vaccine viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2016, 113, E8296–E8305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, L.; Xia, H.; Huang, J.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, C.; Su, J.; Ping, J. Features of Nuclear Export Signals of NS2 Protein of Influenza D Virus. Viruses 2020, 12, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Wang, M.; Veit, M. Hemagglutinin-esterase-fusion (HEF) protein of influenza C virus. Protein Cell 2016, 7, 28–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Lewnard, J.A.; Cobey, S. Immune History and Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness. Vaccines 2018, 6, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. White, M.C.; Lowen, A.C. Implications of segment mismatch for influenza A virus evolution. J. Gen. Virol. 2018, 99, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Brooke, C.B. Population Diversity and Collective Interactions during Influenza Virus Infection. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e01164-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Hussain, M.; Galvin, H.D.; Haw, T.Y.; Nutsford, A.N.; Husain, M. Drug resistance in influenza A virus: The epidemiology and management. Infect. Drug Resist. 2017, 10, 121–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Szymański, K.; Łuniewska, K.; Hallmann-Szelińska, E.; Sałamatin, R.; Masny, A.; Brydak, L.B. Regional Activity and Spread of Influenza Viruses in Poland in the Context of Neighboring Countries in the Epidemic Season 2017-2018: An Epidemiological Review. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020, 1271, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhu, A.; Liu, J.; Ye, C.; Yu, J.; Peng, Z.; Feng, L.; Wang, L.; Qin, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Li, Z. Characteristics of Seasonal Influenza Virus Activity in a Subtropical City in China, 2013–2019. Vaccines 2020, 8, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zambon, M. Influenza and other emerging respiratory viruses. Medicine 2014, 42, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Nyhan, B.; Reifler, J. Does correcting myths about the flu vaccine work? An experimental evaluation of the effects of corrective information. Vaccine 2015, 33, 459–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Elbahesh, H.; Gerlach, T.; Saletti, G.; Rimmelzwaan, G.F. Response Modifiers: Tweaking the Immune Response Against Influenza A Virus. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yoo, S.J.; Kwon, T.; Lyoo, Y.S. Challenges of influenza A viruses in humans and animals and current animal vaccines as an effective control measure. Clin. Exp. Vaccine Res. 2018, 7, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Meineke, R.; Rimmelzwaan, G.F.; Elbahesh, H. Influenza Virus Infections and Cellular Kinases. Viruses 2019, 11, 171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wang, W.; Wu, J.; Zhang, X.; Hao, C.; Zhao, X.; Jiao, G.; Shan, X.; Tai, W.; Yu, G. Inhibition of Influenza A Virus Infection by Fucoidan Targeting Viral Neuraminidase and Cellular EGFR Pathway. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 40760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Muñoz-Moreno, R.; Martínez-Romero, C.; García-Sastre, A. Induction and Evasion of Type-I Interferon Responses during Influenza A Virus Infection. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Luo, M. Influenza virus entry. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2012, 726, 201–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Sun, X.; Whittaker, G.R. Entry of influenza virus. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2013, 790, 72–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Wohlgemuth, N.; Lane, A.P.; Pekosz, A. Influenza A Virus M2 Protein Apical Targeting Is Required for Efficient Virus Replication. J. Virol. 2018, 92, e01425-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Vanderlinden, E.; Naesens, L. Emerging antiviral strategies to interfere with influenza virus entry. Med. Res. Rev. 2014, 34, 301–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Jakubcová, L.; Vozárová, M.; Hollý, J.; Tomčíková, K.; Fogelová, M.; Polčicová, K.; Kostolanský, F.; Fodor, E.; Varečková, E. Biological properties of influenza A virus mutants with amino acid substitutions in the HA2 glycoprotein of the HA1/HA2 interaction region. J. Gen. Virol. 2019, 100, 1282–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Righetto, I.; Milani, A.; Cattoli, G.; Filippini, F. Comparative structural analysis of haemagglutinin proteins from type A influenza viruses: Conserved and variable features. BMC Bioinform. 2014, 15, 363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Jiang, S.; Li, R.; Du, L.; Liu, S. Roles of the hemagglutinin of influenza A virus in viral entry and development of antiviral therapeutics and vaccines. Protein Cell 2010, 1, 342–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hutchinson, E.C. Influenza Virus. Trends Microbiol. 2018, 26, 809–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Galloway, S.E.; Reed, M.L.; Russell, C.J.; Steinhauer, D.A. Influenza HA subtypes demonstrate divergent phenotypes for cleavage activation and pH of fusion: Implications for host range and adaptation. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9, e1003151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kubiszewski-Jakubiak, S.; Worch, R. Influenza A H1 and H3 Transmembrane Domains Interact Differently with Each Other and with Surrounding Membrane Lipids. Viruses 2020, 12, 1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wang, S.; Chen, C.; Yang, Z.; Chi, X.; Zhang, J.; Chen, J.L. Targeted disruption of influenza A virus hemagglutinin in genetically modified mice reduces viral replication and improves disease outcome. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Hamilton, B.S.; Whittaker, G.R.; Daniel, S. Influenza virus-mediated membrane fusion: Determinants of hemagglutinin fusogenic activity and experimental approaches for assessing virus fusion. Viruses 2012, 4, 1144–1168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jakubcová, L.; Hollý, J.; Varečková, E. The role of fusion activity of influenza A viruses in their biological properties. Acta Virol. 2016, 60, 121–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yang, J.; Li, M.; Shen, X.; Liu, S. Influenza A virus entry inhibitors targeting the hemagglutinin. Viruses 2013, 5, 352–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Guo, H.; Rabouw, H.; Slomp, A.; Dai, M.; van der Vegt, F.; van Lent, J.W.M.; McBride, R.; Paulson, J.C.; de Groot, R.J.; van Kuppeveld, F.J.M.; et al. Kinetic analysis of the influenza A virus HA/NA balance reveals contribution of NA to virus-receptor binding and NA-dependent rolling on receptor-containing surfaces. PLoS Pathog. 2018, 14, e1007233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Kwak, D.K.; Kim, J.S.; Lee, M.K.; Ryu, K.S.; Chi, S.W. Probing the Neuraminidase Activity of Influenza Virus Using a Cytolysin A Protein Nanopore. Anal. Chem. 2020, 92, 14303–14308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wagner, R.; Wolff, T.; Herwig, A.; Pleschka, S.; Klenk, H.D. Interdependence of hemagglutinin glycosylation and neuraminidase as regulators of influenza virus growth: A study by reverse genetics. J. Virol. 2000, 74, 6316–6323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Du, W.; de Vries, E.; van Kuppeveld, F.J.M.; Matrosovich, M.; de Haan, C.A.M. Second sialic acid-binding site of influenza A virus neuraminidase: Binding receptors for efficient release. FEBS J. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Vahey, M.D.; Fletcher, D.A. Influenza A virus surface proteins are organized to help penetrate host mucus. Elife 2019, 8, e43764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Han, C.W.; Jeong, M.S.; Jang, S.B. Structure and Function of the Influenza A Virus Non-Structural Protein 1. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 29, 1184–1192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Makau, J.N.; Watanabe, K.; Otaki, H.; Mizuta, S.; Ishikawa, T.; Kamatari, Y.O.; Nishida, N. A Quinolinone Compound Inhibiting the Oligomerization of Nucleoprotein of Influenza A Virus Prevents the Selection of Escape Mutants. Viruses 2020, 12, 337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Massari, S.; Desantis, J.; Nizi, M.G.; Cecchetti, V.; Tabarrini, O. Inhibition of Influenza Virus Polymerase by Interfering with Its Protein-Protein Interactions. ACS Infect. Dis. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Zhou, Y.; Wu, X.; Yan, D.; Chen, C.; Liu, X.; Huang, C.; Fu, X.; Tian, G.; Ding, C.; Wu, J.; et al. V292I mutation in PB2 polymerase induces increased effects of E627K on influenza H7N9 virus replication in cells. Virus Res. 2021, 291, 198186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Song, W.; Wang, P.; Mok, B.W.; Lau, S.Y.; Huang, X.; Wu, W.L.; Zheng, M.; Wen, X.; Yang, S.; Chen, Y.; et al. The K526R substitution in viral protein PB2 enhances the effects of E627K on influenza virus replication. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 5509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Te Velthuis, A.J.; Fodor, E. Influenza virus RNA polymerase: Insights into the mechanisms of viral RNA synthesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016, 14, 479–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Davis, A.M.; Chabolla, B.J.; Newcomb, L.L. Emerging antiviral resistant strains of influenza A and the potential therapeutic targets within the viral ribonucleoprotein (vRNP) complex. Virol. J. 2014, 11, 167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  48. Wang, S.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, R.; Chi, X.; Yang, Z.; Xie, Y.; Shu, S.; Liao, Y.; Chen, J.L. Identification of two residues within the NS1 of H7N9 influenza A virus that critically affect the protein stability and function. Vet. Res. 2018, 49, 98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ai, H.; Zhang, L.; Chang, A.K.; Wei, H.; Che, Y.; Liu, H. Virtual screening of potential inhibitors from TCM for the CPSF30 binding site on the NS1A protein of influenza A virus. J. Mol. Model. 2014, 20, 2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Twu, K.Y.; Noah, D.L.; Rao, P.; Kuo, R.L.; Krug, R.M. The CPSF30 binding site on the NS1A protein of influenza A virus is a potential antiviral target. J. Virol. 2006, 80, 3957–3965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Webster, R.G.; Bean, W.J.; Gorman, O.T.; Chambers, T.M.; Kawaoka, Y. Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Microbiol. Rev. 1992, 56, 152–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Yoon, S.W.; Webby, R.J.; Webster, R.G. Evolution and ecology of influenza A viruses. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 2014, 385, 359–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Wille, M.; Holmes, E.C. The Ecology and Evolution of Influenza Viruses. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2020, 10, a038489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lyons, D.M.; Lauring, A.S. Mutation and Epistasis in Influenza Virus Evolution. Viruses 2018, 10, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Jiang, D.; Wang, Q.; Bai, Z.; Qi, H.; Ma, J.; Liu, W.; Ding, F.; Li, J. Could Environment Affect the Mutation of H1N1 Influenza Virus? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shen, Z.; Lou, K.; Wang, W. New small-molecule drug design strategies for fighting resistant influenza A. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 2015, 5, 419–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  57. Yen, H.L. Current and novel antiviral strategies for influenza infection. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2016, 18, 126–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Bassetti, M.; Castaldo, N.; Carnelutti, A. Neuraminidase inhibitors as a strategy for influenza treatment: Pros, cons and future perspectives. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 2019, 20, 1711–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Cohen, M.; Zhang, X.Q.; Senaati, H.P.; Chen, H.W.; Varki, N.M.; Schooley, R.T.; Gagneux, P. Influenza A penetrates host mucus by cleaving sialic acids with neuraminidase. Virol. J. 2013, 10, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Vorobjev, Y.N. An effective molecular blocker of ion channel of M2 protein as anti-influenza a drug. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Müller, K.H.; Kakkola, L.; Nagaraj, A.S.; Cheltsov, A.V.; Anastasina, M.; Kainov, D.E. Emerging cellular targets for influenza antiviral agents. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2012, 33, 89–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Pagadala, N.S. AZT acts as an anti-influenza nucleotide triphosphate targeting the catalytic site of A/PR/8/34/H1N1 RNA dependent RNA polymerase. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2019, 33, 387–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Georgel, A.F.; Cayet, D.; Pizzorno, A.; Rosa-Calatrava, M.; Paget, C.; Sencio, V.; Dubuisson, J.; Trottein, F.; Sirard, J.C.; Carnoy, C. Toll-like receptor 5 agonist flagellin reduces influenza A virus replication independently of type I interferon and interleukin 22 and improves antiviral efficacy of oseltamivir. Antivir. Res. 2019, 168, 28–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Renzette, N.; Caffrey, D.R.; Zeldovich, K.B.; Liu, P.; Gallagher, G.R.; Aiello, D.; Porter, A.J.; Kurt-Jones, E.A.; Bolon, D.N.; Poh, Y.P.; et al. Evolution of the influenza A virus genome during development of oseltamivir resistance in vitro. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 272–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Boianelli, A.; Sharma-Chawla, N.; Bruder, D.; Hernandez-Vargas, E.A. Oseltamivir PK/PD Modeling and Simulation to Evaluate Treatment Strategies against Influenza-Pneumococcus Coinfection. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2016, 6, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Ait-Aissa, A.; Derrar, F.; Hannoun, D.; Gradi, E.A.; Scaravelli, D.; Bouslama, Z. Surveillance for antiviral resistance among influenza viruses circulating in Algeria during five consecutive influenza seasons (2009–2014). J. Med. Virol. 2018, 90, 844–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Takahashi, E.; Sawabuchi, T.; Kimoto, T.; Sakai, S.; Kido, H. Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus OLL1073R-1 feeding enhances humoral immune responses, which are suppressed by the antiviral neuraminidase inhibitor oseltamivir in influenza A virus-infected mice. J. Dairy Sci. 2019, 102, 9559–9569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, S.; Li, R.; Zhang, R.; Chan, C.C.; Xi, B.; Zhu, Z.; Yang, J.; Poon, V.K.; Zhou, J.; Chen, M.; et al. CL-385319 inhibits H5N1 avian influenza A virus infection by blocking viral entry. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2011, 660, 460–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Smee, D.F.; Dagley, A.; Tarbet, E.B. Combinations of L-N(G)-monomethyl-arginine and oseltamivir against pandemic influenza A virus infections in mice. Antivir. Chem. Chemother. 2017, 25, 11–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  70. Belardo, G.; Cenciarelli, O.; La Frazia, S.; Rossignol, J.F.; Santoro, M.G. Synergistic effect of nitazoxanide with neuraminidase inhibitors against influenza A viruses in vitro. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2015, 59, 1061–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Fernandes, A.C.L.; Vale, A.J.M.; Guzen, F.P.; Pinheiro, F.I.; Cobucci, R.N.; de Azevedo, E.P. Therapeutic Options Against the New Coronavirus: Updated Clinical and Laboratory Evidences. Front. Med. 2020, 7, 546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Wang, K.; Lei, Z.; Zhao, L.; Chen, B.; Yang, F.; Liu, K.; Zhu, H.; Zhao, H.; Cao, R.; Zhang, K.; et al. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of oseltamivir derivatives containing pyridyl group as potent inhibitors of neuraminidase for influenza A. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 185, 111841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Jin, J.; Chen, Y.; Wang, D.; Ma, L.; Guo, M.; Zhou, C.; Dou, J. The inhibitory effect of sodium baicalin on oseltamivir-resistant influenza A virus via reduction of neuraminidase activity. Arch. Pharm. Res. 2018, 41, 664–676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. White, M.C.; Tao, H.; Steel, J.; Lowen, A.C. H5N8 and H7N9 packaging signals constrain HA reassortment with a seasonal H3N2 influenza A virus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 4611–4618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Limburg, H.; Harbig, A.; Bestle, D.; Stein, D.A.; Moulton, H.M.; Jaeger, J.; Janga, H.; Hardes, K.; Koepke, J.; Schulte, L.; et al. TMPRSS2 Is the Major Activating Protease of Influenza A Virus in Primary Human Airway Cells and Influenza B Virus in Human Type II Pneumocytes. J. Virol. 2019, 93, e00649-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Ye, M.; Liao, Y.; Wu, L.; Qi, W.; Choudhry, N.; Liu, Y.; Chen, W.; Song, G.; Chen, J. An Oleanolic Acid Derivative Inhibits Hemagglutinin-Mediated Entry of Influenza A Virus. Viruses 2020, 12, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Scott, C.; Kankanala, J.; Foster, T.L.; Goldhill, D.H.; Bao, P.; Simmons, K.; Pingen, M.; Bentham, M.; Atkins, E.; Loundras, E.; et al. Site-directed M2 proton channel inhibitors enable synergistic combination therapy for rimantadine-resistant pandemic influenza. PLoS Pathog. 2020, 16, e1008716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Manzoor, R.; Igarashi, M.; Takada, A. Influenza A Virus M2 Protein: Roles from Ingress to Egress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Jalily, P.H.; Duncan, M.C.; Fedida, D.; Wang, J.; Tietjen, I. Put a cork in it: Plugging the M2 viral ion channel to sink influenza. Antivir. Res. 2020, 178, 104780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Radosevic, D.; Sencanski, M.; Perovic, V.; Veljkovic, N.; Prljic, J.; Veljkovic, V.; Mantlo, E.; Bukreyeva, N.; Paessler, S.; Glisic, S. Virtual Screen for Repurposing of Drugs for Candidate Influenza a M2 Ion-Channel Inhibitors. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2019, 9, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Li, N.; Zhang, Y.; Wu, S.; Xu, R.; Li, Z.; Zhu, J.; Wang, H.; Li, X.; Tian, M.; Lu, H.; et al. Tauroursodeoxycholic acid (TUDCA) inhibits influenza A viral infection by disrupting viral proton channel M2. Sci. Bull. 2019, 64, 180–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Vanderlinden, E.; Vrancken, B.; Van Houdt, J.; Rajwanshi, V.K.; Gillemot, S.; Andrei, G.; Lemey, P.; Naesens, L. Distinct Effects of T-705 (Favipiravir) and Ribavirin on Influenza Virus Replication and Viral RNA Synthesis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2016, 60, 6679–6691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ilyushina, N.A.; Hay, A.; Yilmaz, N.; Boon, A.C.; Webster, R.G.; Govorkova, E.A. Oseltamivir-ribavirin combination therapy for highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus infection in mice. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2008, 52, 3889–3897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Jordan, P.C.; Stevens, S.K.; Deval, J. Nucleosides for the treatment of respiratory RNA virus infections. Antivir. Chem. Chemother. 2018, 26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Shiraki, K.; Daikoku, T. Favipiravir, an anti-influenza drug against life-threatening RNA virus infections. Pharmacol. Ther. 2020, 209, 107512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Brendish, N.J.; Clark, T.W. Antiviral treatment of severe non-influenza respiratory virus infection. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. 2017, 30, 573–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Bank, C.; Renzette, N.; Liu, P.; Matuszewski, S.; Shim, H.; Foll, M.; Bolon, D.N.; Zeldovich, K.B.; Kowalik, T.F.; Finberg, R.W.; et al. An experimental evaluation of drug-induced mutational meltdown as an antiviral treatment strategy. Evolution 2016, 70, 2470–2484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Ormond, L.; Liu, P.; Matuszewski, S.; Renzette, N.; Bank, C.; Zeldovich, K.; Bolon, D.N.; Kowalik, T.F.; Finberg, R.W.; Jensen, J.D.; et al. The Combined Effect of Oseltamivir and Favipiravir on Influenza A Virus Evolution. Genome Biol. Evol. 2017, 9, 1913–1924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Hashimoto, T.; Baba, K.; Inoue, K.; Okane, M.; Hata, S.; Shishido, T.; Naito, A.; Wildum, S.; Omoto, S. Comprehensive assessment of amino acid substitutions in the trimeric RNA polymerase complex of influenza A virus detected in clinical trials of baloxavir marboxil. Influenza Other Respir. Viruses 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ison, M.G.; Portsmouth, S.; Yoshida, Y.; Shishido, T.; Mitchener, M.; Tsuchiya, K.; Uehara, T.; Hayden, F.G. Early treatment with baloxavir marboxil in high-risk adolescent and adult outpatients with uncomplicated influenza (CAPSTONE-2): A randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2020, 20, 1204–1214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Ando, Y.; Noshi, T.; Sato, K.; Ishibashi, T.; Yoshida, Y.; Hasegawa, T.; Onishi, M.; Kitano, M.; Oka, R.; Kawai, M.; et al. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analysis of baloxavir marboxil, a novel cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor, in a murine model of influenza virus infection. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2021, 76, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Mishin, V.P.; Patel, M.C.; Chesnokov, A.; De La Cruz, J.; Nguyen, H.T.; Lollis, L.; Hodges, E.; Jang, Y.; Barnes, J.; Uyeki, T.; et al. Susceptibility of Influenza A, B, C, and D Viruses to Baloxavir(1). Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2019, 25, 1969–1972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Noshi, T.; Kitano, M.; Taniguchi, K.; Yamamoto, A.; Omoto, S.; Baba, K.; Hashimoto, T.; Ishida, K.; Kushima, Y.; Hattori, K.; et al. In vitro characterization of baloxavir acid, a first-in-class cap-dependent endonuclease inhibitor of the influenza virus polymerase PA subunit. Antivir. Res. 2018, 160, 109–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wang, J.; Sun, J.; Hu, J.; Wang, C.; Prinz, R.A.; Peng, D.; Liu, X.; Xu, X. A77 1726, the active metabolite of the anti-rheumatoid arthritis drug leflunomide, inhibits influenza A virus replication in vitro and in vivo by inhibiting the activity of Janus kinases. FASEB J. 2020, 34, 10132–10145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Rajasekaran, D.; Palombo, E.A.; Chia Yeo, T.; Lim Siok Ley, D.; Lee Tu, C.; Malherbe, F.; Grollo, L. Identification of traditional medicinal plant extracts with novel anti-influenza activity. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e79293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Ti, H. Phytochemical profiles and their anti-inflammatory responses against influenza from Traditional Chinese medicine or herbs. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Li, M.; Wang, Y.; Jin, J.; Dou, J.; Guo, Q.; Ke, X.; Zhou, C.; Guo, M. Inhibitory Activity of Honeysuckle Extracts against Influenza A Virus In Vitro and In Vivo. Virol. Sin. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Li, Z.; Li, L.; Zhou, H.; Zeng, L.; Chen, T.; Chen, Q.; Zhou, B.; Wang, Y.; Chen, Q.; Hu, P.; et al. Radix isatidis Polysaccharides Inhibit Influenza a Virus and Influenza A Virus-Induced Inflammation via Suppression of Host TLR3 Signaling In Vitro. Molecules 2017, 22, 116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Wong, J.P.; Christopher, M.E.; Viswanathan, S.; Dai, X.; Salazar, A.M.; Sun, L.Q.; Wang, M. Antiviral role of toll-like receptor-3 agonists against seasonal and avian influenza viruses. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2009, 15, 1269–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Li, P.; Du, R.; Wang, Y.; Hou, X.; Wang, L.; Zhao, X.; Zhan, P.; Liu, X.; Rong, L.; Cui, Q. Identification of Chebulinic Acid and Chebulagic Acid as Novel Influenza Viral Neuraminidase Inhibitors. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wang, H.X.; Zeng, M.S.; Ye, Y.; Liu, J.Y.; Xu, P.P. Antiviral activity of puerarin as potent inhibitor of influenza virus neuraminidase. Phytother. Res. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Li, P.; Du, R.; Chen, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhan, P.; Liu, X.; Kang, D.; Chen, Z.; Zhao, X.; Wang, L.; et al. Punicalagin is a neuraminidase inhibitor of influenza viruses. J. Med. Virol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Wang, J.; Prinz, R.A.; Liu, X.; Xu, X. In Vitro and In Vivo Antiviral Activity of Gingerenone A on Influenza A Virus Is Mediated by Targeting Janus Kinase 2. Viruses 2020, 12, 1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Xiong, Y.; Li, N.X.; Duan, N.; Liu, B.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, C.; Li, L.; Lu, C.; Huang, L. Traditional Chinese Medicine in Treating Influenza: From Basic Science to Clinical Applications. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 575803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Kang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Cui, Q.; Gong, L.; Yang, Y.; Jiang, H.; Rong, L.; Rong, R.; Du, R. Screening for Anti-Influenza Actives of Prefractionated Traditional Chinese Medicines. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2020, 2020, 4979850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Huang, S.H.; Feng, X.L.; Zhang, L.L.; Xu, S.P.; Wu, C.Y.; Wei, W. Antiviral effects of an effective section of a prescription of traditional Chinese medicine on influenza virus A in vitro. Zhong Yao Cai 2009, 32, 391–394. [Google Scholar]
  107. Shi, Y.; Xu, H.; Xiao, Y.; Liu, P.; Pang, P.; Wu, S.; Deng, L.; Chen, X. Gegen Qinlian Decoction Downregulates the TLR7 Signalling Pathway to Control Influenza A Virus Infection. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 121, 109471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Lu, H.; Zhang, L.; Xiao, J.; Wu, C.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Y.; Hu, Z.; Lin, W.; Xie, Q.; Li, H. Effect of feeding Chinese herb medicine ageratum-liquid on intestinal bacterial translocations induced by H9N2 AIV in mice. Virol. J. 2019, 16, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Ding, Y.; Zeng, L.; Li, R.; Chen, Q.; Zhou, B.; Chen, Q.; Cheng, P.L.; Yutao, W.; Zheng, J.; Yang, Z.; et al. The Chinese prescription lianhuaqingwen capsule exerts anti-influenza activity through the inhibition of viral propagation and impacts immune function. BMC Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 17, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Fu, Y.J.; Yan, Y.Q.; Qin, H.Q.; Wu, S.; Shi, S.S.; Zheng, X.; Wang, P.C.; Chen, X.Y.; Tang, X.L.; Jiang, Z.Y. Effects of different principles of Traditional Chinese Medicine treatment on TLR7/NF-κB signaling pathway in influenza virus infected mice. Chin. Med. 2018, 13, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Li, K.; Chen, X.; Zhong, J.; Ye, H.; Zhang, S.; Ge, D.; Wang, X.; Wu, Y. The effects of the Xijiao Dihuang decoction combined with Yinqiao powder on miRNA-mRNA profiles in mice infected with influenza a virus. BMC Complement. Med. Ther. 2020, 20, 286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Jakubiec-Krzesniak, K.; Rajnisz-Mateusiak, A.; Guspiel, A.; Ziemska, J.; Solecka, J. Secondary Metabolites of Actinomycetes and their Antibacterial, Antifungal and Antiviral Properties. Pol. J. Microbiol. 2018, 67, 259–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Li, F.; Lu, S.; Xie, X.; Fan, S.; Chen, D.; Wu, S.; He, J. Antiviral properties of extracts of Streptomyces sp. SMU 03 isolated from the feces of Elephas maximus. Fitoterapia 2020, 143, 104600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Berezin, V.; Abdukhakimova, D.; Trenozhnikova, L.; Bogoyavlenskiy, A.; Turmagambetova, A.; Issanov, A.; Azizan, A. Antiviral activities of extremophilic actinomycetes extracts from Kazakhstan’s unique ecosystems against influenza viruses and paramyxoviruses. Virol. J. 2019, 16, 150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Zhang, J.; Li, B.; Qin, Y.; Karthik, L.; Zhu, G.; Hou, C.; Jiang, L.; Liu, M.; Ye, X.; Liu, M.; et al. A new abyssomicin polyketide with anti-influenza A virus activity from a marine-derived Verrucosispora sp. MS100137. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 104, 1533–1543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Wang, S.; Luo, X.; Yan, R.; Wang, Q.; Qi, Q.; Chi, X.; Zhang, L.; Yu, Z.; Cai, B.; Chen, J.L.; et al. 3-Anhydro-6-hydroxy-ophiobolin A displays high in vitro and in vivo efficacy against influenza A virus infection. Protein Cell 2016, 7, 839–843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Wang, Q.X.; Yang, J.L.; Qi, Q.Y.; Bao, L.; Yang, X.L.; Liu, M.M.; Huang, P.; Zhang, L.X.; Chen, J.L.; Cai, L.; et al. 3-Anhydro-6-hydroxy-ophiobolin A, a new sesterterpene inhibiting the growth of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and inducing the cell death by apoptosis on K562, from the phytopathogenic fungus Bipolaris oryzae. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23, 3547–3550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Article Metrics

Citations

Article Access Statistics

Journal Statistics
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.
Download PDF
Chemical Profiles and Pharmacological Properties with in Silico Studies on Elatostema papillosum Wedd
Previous
Enhanced Sensitivity of CO on Two-Dimensional, Strained, and Defective GaSe
Next