Next Article in Journal
Applications of Photoinduced Phenomena in Supramolecularly Arranged Phthalocyanine Derivatives: A Perspective
Next Article in Special Issue
Cu(I) Complexes of Multidentate N,C,N- and P,C,P-Carbodiphosphorane Ligands and Their Photoluminescence
Previous Article in Journal
Boron and Silicon-Substituted 1,3-Dienes and Dienophiles and Their Use in Diels-Alder Reactions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Syntheses and Reactivity of New Zwitterionic Imidazolium Trihydridoborate and Triphenylborate Species
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Molecules
Volume 25
Issue 16
10.3390/molecules25163741
molecules-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Mercury(II) Complexes of Anionic N-Heterocyclic Carbene Ligands: Steric Effects of the Backbone Substituent

by
Chandrakanta Dash
*,†,
Animesh Das
‡ and
H. V. Rasika Dias
*
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX 76019, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Current address: Department of Chemistry, School of Chemical Sciences and Pharmacy, Central University of Rajasthan, Bandar Sindri, Ajmer-305817, Rajasthan, India.
‡
Current address: Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Guwahati, Guwahati-781039, Assam, India.
Molecules 2020, 25(16), 3741; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25163741
Submission received: 27 July 2020 / Revised: 11 August 2020 / Accepted: 13 August 2020 / Published: 16 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Carbon Ligands: From Fundamental Aspects to Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Mercury(II) complexes (Me-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (1b), (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (2b) and (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgMe (2c) supported by anionic N-heterocyclic carbenes have been obtained in good yields from the reaction of the potassium salt of N-heterocyclic carbene ligand precursors and mercury(II) salts, HgCl2 and MeHgI. These molecules have been characterized by 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR and IR spectroscopy and elemental analysis. X-ray crystal structures of 1b and 2b are also presented. Interestingly, complex 1b is polymeric {(Me-maloNHCDipp)HgCl}n in the solid state, as a result of inter-molecular Hg-O contacts, and features rare three coordinate mercury sites with a T-shaped arrangement, whereas the (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (2b) is monomeric and has a linear, two-coordinate mercury center. The formation of T-shaped structure and the aggregation of complex 1b is attributable to the reduced steric demand of the N-heterocyclic carbene ligand backbone substituent.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

During the past three decades, considerable attention has been given to the chemistry of metal complexes of N-heterocyclic carbenes [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]. N-heterocyclic carbenes are versatile ligands with extensive applications in coordination chemistry and catalysis, as well as in bioinorganic chemistry [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]. Though traditional N-heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) are neutral “L” type ligands, NHCs bearing tethered anionic donor sites (e.g., alkoxide, aryloxide, amido etc.) have also been reported, along with their metal complexes [18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. In contrast, N-heterocyclic carbene ligands with remote anionic functional groups/moieties within the heterocyclic ligand backbone have been less widely investigated [12,28,29]. Reactions of these anionic NHCs with transition metals afford corresponding zwitterionic complexes. Anionic, six-membered ring NHCs based on a malonate unit (maloNHC), introduced by Cesar, Lavigne and co-workers [30], are particularly interesting as they are attractive ligands to stabilize late transition metal ion complexes such as those involving AgI, AuI, RhI, CuI [30,31,32,33,34,35], as well as FeII [36].
The first known metal-NHC complex was a mercury(II) compound reported by Wanzlick and Schonherr in 1968 [37]. The mercury(II)-NHC complexes have played an important role in the development of N-heterocyclic carbene chemistry, but are still less explored compared to other metals of the d-block [38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48]. Furthermore, to our knowledge, mercury(II) complexes of anionic N-herterocyclic carbene ligands, such as maloNHC, have not been investigated. As a continuation of our interest in the NHCs and their metal chemistry [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60], we have set out to probe the use of anionic N-heterocyclic carbene ligands in mercury chemistry. In particular, we describe the synthesis and spectroscopic data of three new mercury(II) complexes (Figure 1), (Me-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (1b), (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (2b) and (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgMe (2c), involving a bulkier maloNHC. We have also studied the effects of backbone substituent in heterocyclic ring (malonate unit), on the structure of the mercury complexes 1b and 2b.

2. Results and Discussion

Synthesis and Characterization

The anionic, six-membered N-heterocyclic carbene ligand precursor 1a has been reported earlier [32]. The anionic-NHC ligand precursors 1a and 2a were synthesized using the strategy reported by César et al. (from the condensation of N,N’-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)formamidine and monosubstituted malonic acid) [30]. Moreover, 1H NMR spectrum of 2a in CDCl3 at room temperature exhibits a signal corresponding to the NCHN proton at the δ 8.07 ppm (compare for 1a: δ 8.06 ppm [32]). The mercury(II) complexes, (Me-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (1b) and (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (2b), were prepared from in situ generated anionic N-heterocyclic carbene ligand, by using KHMDS as the base and HgCl2 as the mercury source (Scheme 1). The complexes 1b and 2b are yellow crystalline solids, which were characterized by NMR, IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis and X-ray crystallography. They are air and light stable solids, and soluble in dichloromethane, THF and chloroform. The 1H NMR spectra of 1b and 2b in CDCl3 at room temperature showed the absence of NCHN resonance of the starting precursors (1a or 2a). The 13C{1H} NMR spectrum showed the appearance of a highly downfield shifted mercury bound carbene carbon resonance at δ 180.9 and 179.9 ppm, for 1b and 2b, respectively. We did not observe Hg-Ccarbene coupling in the 13C NMR spectrum, although large Ccarbene-Hg coupling in the range 2700–3300 Hz has been reported in the literature [61,62]. Yellow crystals of these molecules could be obtained from dichloromethane solution layering with hexane at −10 °C.
The molecular structures of the complexes 1b and 2b are illustrated in Figure 2 and Figure 3. The complex 1b crystallizes in P-1 space group with two chemically similar molecules of 1b in the asymmetric unit. X-ray structure of 1b shows the presence of three coordinated mercury atoms (and zig-zag polymeric chains resulting from bridging Hg-O contacts involving neighboring molecules) having a distorted T-shaped geometry with bond angles of 86.68(7)°, 157.34(12)°, 115.97(13)° at Hg1 and 86.52(7)°, 156.92(12)°, 116.55(13)° at Hg2. The inter-molecular Hg-O bond distances of 2.537(3) and 2.529(3) Å are shorter than the sum of van der Waals radii of the respective elements, which is 3.07 Å for an Hg…O interaction. For comparison, interactions of similar magnitude have been observed in the complex C6F5HgCl•DMSO [Hg-O = 2.542(2) Å], reported by the Gabbai group [63]. The average Hg-Ccarbene bond distance in 1b is 2.091(4) Å, which is in good agreement with the five membered imidazole based mercury carbene complexes, i.e., [(IDipp)HgCl2] [2.090(4) Å], [(IMes)HgCl2] [2.084(6) Å] [64]. The average Hg-Cl bond distance in 1b (2.3154(11) Å) is comparable to the other three coordinated, T-shaped mercury complexes, namely, [2-(Me2NCH2)C6H4]HgCl [2.319(2) Å], C6F5HgCl•DMSO [2.322(2) Å] [63,65].
The complex (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (2b) crystallizes in P-1 space group with two independent molecules of (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgCl in the asymmetric unit. In contrast to the complex 1b, the mercury complex 2b has a two-coordinate linear mercury center with Ccarbene-Hg-Cl bond angles of 177.50(15)° and 177.74(15)° for the two molecules. This is likely a result of having a bulky t-Bu moiety in the six-membered ring at the remote, apical carbon, in addition to the bulky N-aryl group, which inhibit the interaction of mercury atom with oxygen atom in an adjacent molecule. We should note here that electronic donor properties at the carbene center have been modulated by using electrophiles to interact with oxygen atoms of remote malonate group of Me-maloNHCMes and t-Bu-maloNHCMes in rhodium complexes [35]. The linear geometry at mercury of (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgCl is commonly found in Hg-NHC complexes involving five membered neutral NHCs. The average Ccarbene-Hg bond distance in 2b (2.059(5) Å) is similar to those observed in the other mercury complexes reported in the literature. The Hg-Cl distances in 2b 2.2558(15) and 2.235(2) Å are shorter than in those found in complex 1b [2.3158(10) Å]. This is not surprising, as complex 1b has three coordinate mercury sites, whereas they are two-coordinate in 2b.
The mercury(II) complex, (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgMe (2c) was synthesized from a reaction between in situ generated anionic N-heterocyclic carbene ligand and MeHgI as the metal precursor (Scheme 2) in THF. It was isolated as a yellow colored solid in 70% yield. The 13C resonance of the mercury(II)-bound carbene carbon (NCN) of (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgMe (2c) in CDCl3 was observed as a singlet at δ 205.8 ppm. We have not attempted to obtain crystalline materials of 2c for an X-ray crystallographic study.

3. Experimental Sections

3.1. Materials and General Methods

All manipulations were carried out under an atmosphere of dry nitrogen, using standard Schlenk techniques, or in a glove box. Solvents were purchased from commercial sources, purified using an Innovative Technology SPS-400 PureSolv solvent drying system (Innovative Technology, Inc., Galway, Ireland), degassed by the freeze-pump-thaw method twice prior to use. Glassware was oven-dried at 150 °C overnight. NMR spectra were recorded at 298 K on JEOL Eclipse 500 and 300 spectrometers (Jeol Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). NMR annotations used: br. = broad, d = doublet, m = multiplet, s = singlet, t = triplet, sept = septet. Infrared spectra were recorded on a JASCO FT-IR 410 spectrometer (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan) operating at 2 cm−1 spectral resolution. IR spectroscopic data were collected using KBr pellets. Herein, we use abbreviations based on IUPAC guidelines, that is, ν for frequency and ῡ for wavenumber. Elemental analyses were performed using a Perkin Elmer Series II CHNS/O analyzer. Methylmalonic acid, DCC were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and used without further purification. N,N’-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)formamidine [66] and tert-butylmalonic acid [67] were synthesized as reported, and anionic-NHC ligand precursor (1a) [32] was obtained via a modified literature procedure (noted below). The data of NMR spectrum can be found in the Supplementary Materials.

3.1.1. Synthesis of 1,3-Bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-5-methyl-6-oxo-6H-pyrimidinium-4-olate (1a)

A mixture of N,N’-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)formamidine (1.81 g, 4.96 mmol) and N,N’-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) (2.04 g, 9.92 mmol) in dichloromethane (ca. 35 mL) was placed in a 50 mL Schlenk flask. To this mixture, methylmalonic acid (0.586 g, 4.96 mmol) was added as a solid at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred for 5 h. The solution was filtered and the solvents were evaporated. The residue was purified by flash chromatography (SiO2, 30% EtOAc in hexane), to obtain a yellow crystalline solid (1.62 g, 73% yield). The analytical data agree with the reported values [32].

3.1.2. Synthesis of 1,3-Bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)-5-tert-butyl-6-oxo-6H-pyrimidinium-4-olate (2a)

A mixture of N,N’-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)formamidine (5.18 g, 14.2 mmol) and N,N’-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) (5.86 g, 28.4 mmol) in dichloromethane (ca. 50 mL) was taken in a 100 mL Schlenk flask. To this mixture, tert-butylmalonic acid (2.27 g, 14.2 mmol) was then added as a solid at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred for 6 h. The solution was filtered and the solvents were evaporated. The residue was purified by chromatography (SiO2, 10% EtOAc in hexane) to give a yellow crystalline solid (4.71 g, 68% yield). Mp: 255–260 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500.16 MHz, 298 K): δ 8.07 (s, 1H, NCHN), 7.42 (t, 2H, 3JHH = 8.0 Hz, C6H3), 7.25 (d, 4H, 3JHH = 8.0 Hz, C6H3), 2.80 (sept, 4H, 3JHH = 6.9 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.46 (s, 9H, C(CH3)3), 1.30 (d, 12H, 3JHH = 6.9 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.20 (d, 12H, 3JHH = 6.9 Hz, CH(CH3)2). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 125.77 MHz, 298 K): δ 158.3 (C-O), 146.9, 145.7, 132.5, 130.6, 124.2, 104.2, 34.5, 30.0, 29.2, 24.1, 23.9. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3068, 2991, 2856, 1926, 1778, 1760, 1687, 1598, 1581, 1462, 1425, 1387, 1364, 1351, 1327, 1304, 1282, 1258, 1218, 1183, 1149, 1107, 1059, 1018, 981, 937, 875, 803, 761, 741. Anal. Calcd. for C32H44N2O2: C, 78.65; H, 9.07; N, 5.73. Found: C, 79.01; H, 9.03; N, 6.04%.

3.1.3. Synthesis of (Me-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (1b)

To a solution of 1a (0.491 g, 1.10 mmol) in THF (30 mL), KHMDS (0.5 M in toluene, 2.2 mL, 1.10 mmol, 1.0 equiv.) was added dropwise at 0 °C (ice bath). After 30 min at 0 °C, HgCl2 (0.299 g, 1.10 mmol) was added as a solid. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 6 h. The solvent was removed under vacuum, and the crude residue was dissolved in dichloromethane (30 mL). The mixture was filtered through a pad of Celite, and the filtrate was evaporated under vacuum to obtain a yellow solid. The compound was further washed with hexane and vacuum dried (0.405 g, 54% yield). Mp: 287 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500.16 MHz, 298 K): δ 7.53 (t, 2H, 3JHH = 8.0 Hz, C6H3), 7.33 (d, 4H, 3JHH = 8.0 Hz, C6H3), 2.80 (sept, 4H, 3JHH = 6.9 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 2.02 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.27 (d, 12H, 3JHH = 6.9 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.22 (d, 12H, 3JHH = 6.9 Hz, CH(CH3)2). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 125.77 MHz, 298 K): δ 180.9 (Hg-NCN), 160.1 (C-O), 146.2, 136.7, 131.8, 125.4, 94.4, 29.1, 24.6, 24.4, 10.1. IR (KBr) cm−1: 2963, 2928, 2871, 1727, 1678, 1645, 1610, 1546, 1466, 1447, 1386, 1365, 1345, 1322, 1259, 1222, 1181, 1147, 1107, 1062, 1039, 934, 795, 755. Anal. Calcd. for C29H37N2O2HgCl•THF: C, 52.58; H, 6.02; N, 3.72. Found: C, 52.63; H, 5.81; N, 4.13%.

3.1.4. (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (2b)

To a solution of 2a (0.752 g, 1.54 mmol) in THF (30 mL), KHMDS (0.5 M in toluene, 3.4 mL, 1.70 mmol, 1.1 equiv.) was added dropwise at 0 °C (ice bath). After 30 min at 0 °C, HgCl2 (0.418 g, 1.54 mmol) was added as a solid. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 6 h. The solvent was removed under vacuum, and the crude residue was dissolved in dichloromethane (40 mL). The mixture was filtered through a pad of Celite, and the filtrate was evaporated under vacuum to obtain a yellow solid. The compound was further washed with hexane and vacuum dried (0.657 g, 59% yield). Mp: 250 °C. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500.16 MHz, 298 K): δ 7.51 (t, 2H, 3JHH = 8 Hz, C6H3), 7.33 (d, 4H, 3JHH = 8 Hz, C6H3), 2.85 (sept, 4H, 3JHH = 6.9 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.45 (s, 9H, C(CH3)3), 1.31 (d, 12H, 3JHH = 6.9 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.26 (d, 12H, 3JHH = 6.9 Hz, CH(CH3)2). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 125.77 MHz, 298 K): δ 179.9 (Hg-NCN), 159.1 (C-O), 146.1, 136.9, 131.6, 125.3, 104.1, 34.5, 30.0, 29.2, 24.4, 24.3. IR (KBr) cm−1: 3069, 2990, 2863, 1644, 1465, 1410, 1387, 1365, 1345, 1325, 1301, 1257, 1215, 1181, 1148, 1111, 1056, 1014, 979, 936, 879, 797, 759, 749. Anal. Calcd. for C32H43N2O2HgCl: C, 53.11; H, 5.99; N, 3.87. Found: C, 53.41; H, 6.52; N, 3.87%.

3.1.5. Synthesis of (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgMe (2c)

To a solution of 1,3-diisopropyl-5-tert-butyl-6-oxo-6H-pyrimidinium-4-olate (0.376 g, 0.77 mmol) in THF (20 mL), KHMDS (0.5 M in toluene, 1.92 mL, 0.96 mmol, 1.25 equiv.) was added dropwise at 0 °C (ice bath). After 30 min at 0 °C, MeHgI (0.264 g, 0.77 mmol) was added as a solid. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 12 h. The solvent was removed under vacuum, and the crude residue was dissolved in dichloromethane (20 mL). The mixture was filtered through a pad of Celite, and the filtrate was evaporated under vacuum to obtain a yellow solid. The compound was washed with hexane and vacuum dried (0.380 g, 70% yield). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500.16 MHz, 298 K): δ 7.43 (t, 2H, 3JHH = 8 Hz, C6H3), 7.27 (d, 4H, 3JHH = 7.5 Hz, C6H3), 2.88 (sept, 4H, 3JHH = 6.9 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.45 (s, 9H, C(CH3)3), 1.29 (d, 12H, 3JHH = 6.9 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 1.21 (d, 12H, 3JHH = 6.9 Hz, CH(CH3)2), 0.21 (s, 3H, CH3). 13C{1H} NMR (CDCl3, 125.77 MHz, 298 K): δ 205.8 (HgNCN), 160.3 (C-O), 146.3, 136.2, 130.5, 124.6, 104.0, 34.5, 30.2, 29.0, 24.3, 24.2, 4.9 (HgCH3). Anal. Calcd. for C33H46N2O2Hg: C, 56.35; H, 6.59; N, 3.98. Found: C, 55.98; H, 6.37; N, 4.11%.

3.2. Crystallographic Data Collection and Refinement

A suitable crystal covered with a layer of hydrocarbon/Paratone-N oil was selected and mounted with in a Cryo-loop, and immediately placed in the low-temperature nitrogen stream. Diffraction data were collected at T = 100(2) K. The data sets were collected on a Bruker SMART APEX II CCD detector diffractometer with graphite monochromated Mo Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). The cell parameters were obtained from a least-squares refinement of the spots (from 60 collected frames), using the SMART program. Intensity data were processed using the Bruker ApexII program suite. Absorption corrections were applied by using SADABS. Initial atomic positions were located by direct methods using XS, and the structures of the compounds were refined by the least-squares method using SHELXL [68]. All the hydrogen atoms were refined anisotropically. Hydrogen positions were input and refined in a riding manner, along with the attached carbons. X-ray structural figures were generated using Olex2 [69]. The CCDC 2019022–2019023 contains the supplementary crystallographic data. These data can be obtained free of charge via http://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/conts/retrieving.html or from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC) (12 Union Road, Cambridge, CB2 1EZ, UK).
Crystal data for (Me-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (1b): C58H74Cl2Hg2N4O4 (M = 1363.29 g/mol): triclinic, space group P 1 ¯ (no. 2), a = 10.7845(8) Å, b = 13.9152(11) Å, c = 19.1697(15) Å, α = 106.9910(10)°, β = 91.2040(10)°, γ = 90.0910(10)°, V = 2750.5(4) Å3, Z = 2, T = 100.15 K, μ(MoKα) = 5.721 mm−1, Dcalc = 1.646 g/cm3, 22,195 reflections measured (3.06° ≤ 2Θ ≤ 50.996°), 10,213 unique (Rint = 0.0257, Rsigma = 0.0369), which were used in all calculations. The final R1 was 0.0313 (I > 2σ(I)) and wR2 was 0.0797 (all data).
Crystal data for (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (2b): C32H43ClHgN2O2 (M = 723.72 g/mol): triclinic, space group P 1 ¯ (no. 2), a = 10.9912(9) Å, b = 14.9118(13) Å, c = 19.9787(17) Å, α = 99.9700(10)°, β = 98.6110(10)°, γ = 90.2430(10)°, V = 3187.1(5) Å3, Z = 4, T = 100.15 K, μ(MoKα) = 4.942 mm−1, Dcalc = 1.508 g/cm3, 27,908 reflections measured (2.774° ≤ 2Θ ≤ 53.464°), 13,462 unique (Rint = 0.0260, Rsigma = 0.0407), which were used in all calculations. The final R1 was 0.0405 (I > 2σ(I)) and wR2 was 0.1067 (all data).

4. Conclusions

In summary, we report the isolation of three new mercury(II) complexes supported by anionic maloNHC ligands. Solid state structures of 1b and 2b illustrate the effects of backbone substituent in maloNHC, supplemented by the N-aryl substituent steric demands have on the aggregation of these mercury complexes. The (Me-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (1b) bearing methyl substituent in the malonate unit forms a polymeric mercury(II) complex, with a rare, distorted T-shaped structure, whereas (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (2b) having a t-butyl substituent on the ligand backbone, remains monomeric. The [t-Bu-maloNHCDipp]− is a sterically demanding and useful supporting ligand to stabilize low-coordinate metal complexes.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online. Crystal data, structure refinement, bond distances and angles for (Me-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (1b) and (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (2b), additional figures, and NMR spectra of new molecules.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.V.R.D.; funding acquisition, H.V.R.D.; Data curation, C.D., A.D.; Methodology, C.D. and A.D.; writing and editing, C.D. and H.V.R.D.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the Robert A. Welch Foundation (Grant Y-1289).

Acknowledgments

We thank Muhammed Yousufuddin for collecting the X-ray data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hopkinson, M.N.; Richter, C.; Schedler, M.; Glorius, F. An overview of N-heterocyclic carbenes. Nature 2014, 510, 485–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Díez-González, S.; Marion, N.; Nolan, S.P. N-Heterocyclic carbenes in late transition metal catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 3612–3676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Doddi, A.; Peters, M.; Tamm, M. N-Heterocyclic carbene adducts of main group elements and their use as ligands in transition metal chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 6994–7112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zhao, Q.; Meng, G.; Nolan, S.P.; Szostak, M. N-Heterocyclic carbene complexes in C–H activation reactions. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 1981–2048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Peris, E. Smart N-heterocyclic carbene ligands in catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2017, 118, 9988–10031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, W.; Cui, L.; Sun, P.; Shi, L.; Yue, C.; Li, F. Reusable N-heterocyclic carbene complex catalysts and beyond: A perspective on recycling strategies. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 9843–9929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cheng, J.; Wang, L.; Wang, P.; Deng, L. High-Oxidation-State 3d metal (Ti–Cu) complexes with N-heterocyclic carbene ligation. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118, 9930–9987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Weskamp, T.; Böhm, V.P.; Herrmann, W.A. N-Heterocyclic carbenes: State of the art in transition-metal-complex synthesis. J. Organomet. Chem. 2000, 600, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Herrmann, W.A.; Elison, M.; Fischer, J.; Köcher, C.; Artus, G.R.J. Metal complexes of N-heterocyclic carbenes—A new structural principle for catalysts in homogeneous catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1995, 34, 2371–2374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hahn, F.E.; Jahnke, M.C. Heterocyclic carbenes: Synthesis and coordination chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3122–3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Herrmann, W.A. N-Heterocyclic carbenes: A new concept in organometallic catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1290–1309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Nasr, A.; Winkler, A.; Tamm, M. Anionic N-heterocyclic carbenes: Synthesis, coordination chemistry and applications in homogeneous catalysis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 316, 68–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Peris, E.; Crabtree, R.H. Recent homogeneous catalytic applications of chelate and pincer N-heterocyclic carbenes. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2004, 248, 2239–2246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mercs, L.; Albrecht, M. Beyond catalysis: N-heterocyclic carbene complexes as components for medicinal, luminescent, and functional materials applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 1903–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zou, T.; Lok, C.-N.; Wan, P.-K.; Zhang, Z.-F.; Fung, S.-K.; Che, C.-M. Anticancer metal- N-heterocyclic carbene complexes of gold, platinum and palladium. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2018, 43, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ibáñez, S.; Poyatos, M.; Peris, E. N-heterocyclic carbenes: A door open to supramolecular organometallic chemistry. Acc. Chem. Res. 2020, 53, 1401–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Santini, C.; Pellei, M.; Gandin, V.; Porchia, M.; Tisato, F.; Marzano, C. Advances in copper complexes as anticancer agents. Chem. Rev. 2013, 114, 815–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Aihara, H.; Matsuo, T.; Kawaguchi, H. Titanium N-heterocyclic carbene complexes incorporating an imidazolium-linked bis(phenol). Chem. Commun. 2003, 17, 2204–2205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Arduengo, A.J., III; Dolphin, J.S.; Gurău, G.; Marshall, W.J.; Nelson, J.C.; Petrov, V.A.; Runyon, J.W. Synthesis and complexes of fluoroalkoxy carbenes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 5110–5114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Arnold, P.L.; Mungur, S.A.; Blake, A.J.; Wilson, C. Anionic amido N-heterocyclic carbenes: Synthesis of covalently tethered lanthanide–carbene complexes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 5981–5984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Arnold, P.L.; Rodden, M.; Wilson, C. Thermally stable potassium N-heterocyclic carbene complexes with alkoxide ligands, and a polymeric crystal structure with distorted, bridging carbenes. Chem. Commun. 2005, 13, 1743–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Arnold, P.L.; Scarisbrick, A.C. Di- and trivalent Ruthenium complexes of chelating, anionic N-heterocyclic carbenes. Organometallics 2004, 23, 2519–2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Asay, M.; Donnadieu, B.; Baceiredo, A.; Soleilhavoup, M.; Bertrand, G. Cyclic (amino)[bis(ylide)]carbene as an anionic bidentate ligand for transition-metal complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 3949–3951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Hameury, S.; de Frémont, P.; Breuil, P.-A.R.; Olivier-Bourbigou, H.; Braunstein, P. Synthesis and characterization of palladium(II) and nickel(II) alcoholate-functionalized NHC complexes and of mixed nickel(II)–lithium(I) complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 5189–5200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ketz, B.E.; Cole, A.P.; Waymouth, R.M. Structure and reactivity of an allylpalladium N-heterocyclic carbene enolate complex. Organometallics 2004, 23, 2835–2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Legault, C.Y.; Kendall, C.; Charette, A.B. Structure and reactivity of a new anionic N-heterocyclic carbene silver(i) complex. Chem. Commun. 2005, 30, 3826–3828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Spencer, L.P.; Beddie, C.; Hall, M.B.; Fryzuk, M.D. Synthesis, reactivity, and DFT studies of tantalum complexes incorporating diamido-N-heterocyclic carbene ligands. facile endocyclic C−H bond activation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 12531–12543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Forster, T.D.; Krahulic, K.E.; Tuononen, H.M.; McDonald, R.; Parvez, M.; Roesler, R. A σ-donor with a planar six-π-electron B2N2C2 framework: Anionic N-heterocyclic carbene or heterocyclic terphenyl anion? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 6356–6359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vujkovic, N.; César, V.; Lugan, N.; Lavigne, G. An ambidentate janus-type ligand system based on fused carbene and imidato functionalities. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 13151–13155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. César, V.; Lugan, N.; Lavigne, G. A Stable Anionic N-heterocyclic carbene and its zwitterionic complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 11286–11287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Bastin, S.; Barthes, C.; Lugan, N.; Lavigne, G.; César, V. Anionic N-heterocyclic carbene complexes of gold(I) as precatalysts for silver-free cycloisomerization of enynes. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 13, 2216–2221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. César, V.; Barthes, C.; Farré, Y.C.; Cuisiat, S.V.; Vacher, B.Y.; Brousses, R.; Lugan, N.; Lavigne, G. Anionic and zwitterionic copper(I) complexes incorporating an anionic N-heterocyclic carbene decorated with a malonate backbone: Synthesis, structure and catalytic applications. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 7373–7385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hobbs, M.G.; Knapp, C.J.; Welsh, P.T.; Borau-Garcia, J.; Ziegler, T.; Roesler, R. Anionic N-heterocyclic carbenes with N,N′-bis(fluoroaryl) and N,N′-bis(perfluoroaryl) substituents. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 14520–14533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Chotard, F.; Romanov, A.S.; Hughes, D.L.; Linnolahti, M.; Bochmann, M. Zwitterionic mixed-carbene coinage metal complexes: Synthesis, structures, and photophysical studies. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 2019, 4234–4240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. César, V.; Lugan, N.; Lavigne, G. Electronic Tuning of a carbene center via remote chemical induction, and relevant effects in catalysis. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 11432–11442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. César, V.; Misal Castro, L.C.; Dombray, T.; Sortais, J.-B.; Darcel, C.; Labat, S.; Miqueu, K.; Sotiropoulos, J.-M.; Brousses, R.; Lugan, N.; et al. (Cyclopentadienyl)iron(II) complexes of N-heterocyclic carbenes Bearing a malonate or imidate backbone: Synthesis, structure, and catalytic potential in hydrosilylation. Organometallics 2013, 32, 4643–4655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wanzlick, H.-W.; Schönherr, H.-J. Direct synthesis of a mercury salt-carbene complex. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1968, 7, 141–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yu, M.-H.; Yang, H.-H.; Gu, Y.-C.; Wang, B.-H.; Liu, F.-C.; Lin, I.J.; Lee, G.-H. Formation of anionic NHC complexes through the reaction of benzimidazoles with mercury chloride. Subsequent protonation and transmetallation reactions. J. Organomet. Chem. 2019, 887, 12–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Baker, M.V.; Brown, D.H.; Haque, R.A.; Simpson, P.V.; Skelton, B.W.; White, A.H.; Williams, C.C. Mercury complexes of N-heterocyclic carbenes derived from imidazolium-linked cyclophanes: Synthesis, structure, and reactivity. Organometallics 2009, 28, 3793–3803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Haque, R.A.; Budagumpi, S.; Choo, S.Y.; Choong, M.K.; Lokesh, B.E.; Sudesh, K. Nitrile-functionalized Hg(II)- and Ag(I)- N-heterocyclic carbene complexes: Synthesis, crystal structures, nuclease and DNA binding activities. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2012, 26, 689–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Budagumpi, S.; Haque, R.A.; Salman, A.W.; Ghdhayeb, M.Z. Mercury(II)- and silver(I)-N-heterocyclic carbene complexes of CNC pincer-type ligands: Synthesis, crystal structures and Hofmann-type elimination studies. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2012, 392, 61–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Budagumpi, S.; Endud, S. Group XII metal– N-heterocyclic carbene complexes: Synthesis, structural diversity, intramolecular interactions, and applications. Organometallics 2013, 32, 1537–1562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Scheele, U.J.; Dechert, S.; Meyer, F. Bridged dinucleating N-heterocyclic carbene ligands and their double helical mercury(II) complexes. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2006, 359, 4891–4900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Lee, K.-M.; Chen, J.C.; Lin, I.J. Helical mono and dinuclear mercury(II) N-heterocyclic carbene complexes. J. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 617, 364–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, Q.-X.; Yin, L.-N.; Feng, J.-C. New N-heterocyclic carbene silver(I) and mercury(II) 2-D supramolecular layers by the π–π stacking interactions. J. Organomet. Chem. 2007, 692, 3655–3663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Haque, R.A.; Salman, A.W.; Guan, T.S.; Abdallah, H.H. New N-heterocyclic carbene mercury(II) complexes: Close mercury–arene interaction. J. Organomet. Chem. 2011, 696, 3507–3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, Y.; Wan, X.; Xu, F. An arene−mercury(II) N-heterocyclic carbene complex. Organometallics 2009, 28, 5590–5592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Liu, Q.-X.; Yin, L.-N.; Wu, X.-M.; Feng, J.-C.; Guo, J.; Song, H.-B. New N-heterocyclic carbene mercury(II) and silver(I) complexes. Polyhedron 2008, 27, 87–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Adiraju, V.A.K.; Jin, W.; Yousufuddin, M.; Dias, H.V. Copper(I) complexes of anionic tridentate CNC pincer ligands. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2020, 646, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dash, C.; Wang, G.; Muñoz-Castro, A.; Ponduru, T.T.; Zacharias, A.O.; Yousufuddin, M.; Dias, H.V.R. Organic azide and auxiliary-ligand-free complexes of coinage metals supported by N-heterocyclic carbenes. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 59, 2188–2199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wang, G.; Pecher, L.; Frenking, G.; Dias, H.V. Vinyltrifluoroborate complexes of silver supported by N-heterocyclic carbenes. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 2018, 4142–4152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Adiraju, V.A.K.; Yousufuddin, M.; Dias, H.V. Copper(I), silver(I) and gold(I) complexes of N-heterocyclic carbene-phosphinidene. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 4449–4454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Dash, C.; Yousufuddin, M.; Cundari, T.R.; Dias, H.V.R. Gold-mediated Expulsion of dinitrogen from organic azides. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 15479–15488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Dash, C.; Das, A.; Yousufuddin, M.; Dias, H.V.R. Isolable, copper(I) dicarbonyl complexes supported by N-heterocyclic carbenes. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 1584–1590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Dash, C.; Kroll, P.; Yousufuddin, M.; Dias, H.V.R. Isolable, gold carbonyl complexes supported by N-heterocyclic carbenes. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 4478–4480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Arduengo, A.J.; Dias, H.V.R.; Harlow, R.L.; Kline, M. Electronic stabilization of nucleophilic carbenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 5530–5534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Arduengo, A.J.; Davidson, F.; Dias, H.V.R.; Goerlich, J.R.; Khasnis, D.; Marshall, W.J.; Prakasha, T.K. An Air stable carbene and mixed carbene “dimers”. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 12742–12749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Arduengo, A.J.; Dias, H.V.R.; Dixon, D.A.; Harlow, R.L.; Klooster, W.T.; Koetzle, T.F. Electron distribution in a stable carbene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 6812–6822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Dias, H.V.R.; Jin, W. A stable tridentate carbene ligand. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 1365–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Arduengo, A.J.; Dias, H.V.R.; Calabrese, J.C.; Davidson, F. Homoleptic carbene-silver(I) and carbene-copper(I) complexes. Organometallics 1993, 12, 3405–3409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Buron, C.; Stelzig, L.; Guerret, O.; Gornitzka, H.; Romanenko, V.; Bertrand, G. Synthesis and structure of 1,2,4-triazol-2-ium-5-ylidene complexes of Hg(II), Pd(II), Ni(II), Ni(0), Rh(I) and Ir(I). J. Organomet. Chem. 2002, 664, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Arduengo, A.J., III; Harlow, R.L.; Marshall, W.J.; Prakasha, T.K. Investigation of a mercury(II) carbene complex: Bis(1,3-dimethylimidazol-2-ylidene) mercury chloride. Heteroat. Chem. 1996, 7, 421–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Tschinkl, M.; Schier, A.; Riede, J.; Gabbaï, F.P. Complexation of DMF and DMSO by a monodentate organomercurial lewis acid. Organometallics 1999, 18, 2040–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Pelz, S.; Mohr, F. “Oxide route” for the preparation of mercury(II) N-heterocyclic carbene complexes. Organometallics 2011, 30, 383–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bumbu, O.; Silvestru, C.; Gimeno, M.C.; Laguna, A. New organomercury(II) compounds containing intramolecular N→Hg interactions: Crystal and molecular structure of [2-(Me2NCH2)C6H4]HgCl and [2-(Me2NCH2)C6H4]Hg[S(S)PPh2]. J. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 689, 1172–1179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kolychev, E.L.; Portnyagin, I.A.; Shuntikov, V.V.; Khrustalev, V.N.; Nechaev, M.S. Six- and seven-membered ring carbenes: Rational synthesis of amidinium salts, generation of carbenes, synthesis of Ag(I) and Cu(I) complexes. J. Organomet. Chem. 2009, 694, 2454–2462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Leung-Toung, R.; Wentrup, C. Flash vacuum pyrolysis of tert-butyl β-ketoesters: Sterically protected α-oxoketenes. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 7641–7654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A Found. Crystallogr. 2007, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Dolomanov, O.V.; Bourhis, L.J.; Gildea, R.J.; Howard, J.A.K.; Puschmann, H. OLEX2: A complete structure solution, refinement and analysis program. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 2009, 42, 339–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds are not available from the authors.
Molecules 25 03741 g001 550
Figure 1. Mercury(II) complexes supported by anionic N-heterocyclic carbenes [Me-maloNHCDipp]− and [t-Bu-maloNHCDipp]−.
Figure 1. Mercury(II) complexes supported by anionic N-heterocyclic carbenes [Me-maloNHCDipp]− and [t-Bu-maloNHCDipp]−.
Molecules 25 03741 g001
Molecules 25 03741 sch001 550
Scheme 1. Synthesis of mercury(II) complexes 1b and 2b supported by anionic NHC.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of mercury(II) complexes 1b and 2b supported by anionic NHC.
Molecules 25 03741 sch001
Molecules 25 03741 g002 550
Figure 2. Molecular structure of (Me-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (1b). Hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity. Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°): Hg1-Cl1 2.3157(11), Hg1-O3 2.537(3), Hg1-C1 2.090(4), Hg2-Cl2 2.3152(11), Hg2-O2 2.529(3), Hg2-C30 2.092(4), O1-C2 1.228(5), O2-C4 1.262(5), O3-C31 1.256(5), O4-C33 1.227(5); Cl1-Hg1-O31 86.68(7); C1-Hg1-Cl1 157.34(12), C1-Hg1-O3 1 115.97(13), Cl2-Hg2-O2 86.52(7), C30-Hg2-Cl2 156.92(12), C30-Hg2-O2 116.55(13), C4-O2-Hg2 116.7(3), C31-O3-Hg1 2 117.3(3), where 1 +X, 1 + Y,+Z; 2 +X, −1 + Y, +Z.
Figure 2. Molecular structure of (Me-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (1b). Hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity. Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°): Hg1-Cl1 2.3157(11), Hg1-O3 2.537(3), Hg1-C1 2.090(4), Hg2-Cl2 2.3152(11), Hg2-O2 2.529(3), Hg2-C30 2.092(4), O1-C2 1.228(5), O2-C4 1.262(5), O3-C31 1.256(5), O4-C33 1.227(5); Cl1-Hg1-O31 86.68(7); C1-Hg1-Cl1 157.34(12), C1-Hg1-O3 1 115.97(13), Cl2-Hg2-O2 86.52(7), C30-Hg2-Cl2 156.92(12), C30-Hg2-O2 116.55(13), C4-O2-Hg2 116.7(3), C31-O3-Hg1 2 117.3(3), where 1 +X, 1 + Y,+Z; 2 +X, −1 + Y, +Z.
Molecules 25 03741 g002
Molecules 25 03741 g003 550
Figure 3. Molecular structure of (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (2b). The second molecule in the asymmetric unit and hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity. Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°): Molecule 1, Hg1-Cl1 2.2558(15), Hg1-C1 2.056(5), O1-C4 1.221(7), O2-C2 1.232(7); C1-Hg1-Cl1 177.50(15); Molecule 2 (not shown), Hg2-Cl2 2.235(2), Hg2-C33 2.062(5), O3-C34 1.229(7), O4-C36 1.220(7), C33-Hg2-Cl2 177.74(15).
Figure 3. Molecular structure of (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgCl (2b). The second molecule in the asymmetric unit and hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity. Selected bond distances (Å) and angles (°): Molecule 1, Hg1-Cl1 2.2558(15), Hg1-C1 2.056(5), O1-C4 1.221(7), O2-C2 1.232(7); C1-Hg1-Cl1 177.50(15); Molecule 2 (not shown), Hg2-Cl2 2.235(2), Hg2-C33 2.062(5), O3-C34 1.229(7), O4-C36 1.220(7), C33-Hg2-Cl2 177.74(15).
Molecules 25 03741 g003
Molecules 25 03741 sch002 550
Scheme 2. Synthesis of mercury(II) complex (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgMe (2c).
Scheme 2. Synthesis of mercury(II) complex (t-Bu-maloNHCDipp)HgMe (2c).
Molecules 25 03741 sch002

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dash, C.; Das, A.; Dias, H.V.R. Mercury(II) Complexes of Anionic N-Heterocyclic Carbene Ligands: Steric Effects of the Backbone Substituent. Molecules 2020, 25, 3741. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25163741

AMA Style

Dash C, Das A, Dias HVR. Mercury(II) Complexes of Anionic N-Heterocyclic Carbene Ligands: Steric Effects of the Backbone Substituent. Molecules. 2020; 25(16):3741. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25163741

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dash, Chandrakanta, Animesh Das, and H. V. Rasika Dias. 2020. "Mercury(II) Complexes of Anionic N-Heterocyclic Carbene Ligands: Steric Effects of the Backbone Substituent" Molecules 25, no. 16: 3741. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25163741

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop