Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Apigenin Derivatives as Antibacterial and Antiproliferative Agents

Liu, Rui; Zhang, Hongchi; Yuan, Maosen; Zhou, Jiao; Tu, Qin; Liu, Jian-Jun; Wang, Jinyi

doi:10.3390/molecules180911496

Open AccessArticle

Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Apigenin Derivatives as Antibacterial and Antiproliferative Agents

by

^1,2,

²,

¹,

¹,

¹,

^1,* and

^1,*

¹

Colleges of Science and Forestry, Northwest A&F University, Yangling 712100, Shaanxi, China

²

College of Agronomy and Life Sciences, Shanxi Datong University, Datong 037009, Shanxi, China

^*

Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Molecules 2013, 18(9), 11496-11511; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules180911496

Received: 8 July 2013 / Revised: 2 September 2013 / Accepted: 12 September 2013 / Published: 17 September 2013

Download

Browse Figure

Versions Notes

Abstract

:

Two series of apigenin [5,7-dihydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one] derivatives, 3a–3j and 4a–4j, were synthesized. The apigenin and alkyl amines moieties of these compounds were separated by C₂ or C₃ spacers, respectively. The chemical structures of the apigenin derivatives were confirmed using ¹H-NMR, ¹³C-NMR, and electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy. The in vitro antibacterial and antiproliferative activities of all synthesized compounds were determined. Among the tested compounds, 4a–4j displayed significant antibacterial activity against the tested strains (Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus subtilis, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa). Additionally, 4i showed the best inhibitory activity with minimum inhibitory concentrations of 1.95, 3.91, 3.91, and 3.91 μg/mL against S. aureus, B. subtilis, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa, respectively. The antiproliferative activity of the apigenin derivatives was evaluated by an MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide] assay. We determined that 4a–4j displayed better growth inhibition activity against four human cancer cell lines, namely, human lung (A549), human cervical (HeLa), human hepatocellular liver (HepG2), and human breast (MCF-7) cancer cells, than the parent apigenin. Compound 4j was found to be the most active antiproliferative compound against the selected cancer cells. Structure-activity relationships were also discussed based on the obtained experimental data.

Keywords:

synthesis; biological evaluation; apigenin derivatives; antibacterial activity; antiproliferative activity; MTT assay

1. Introduction

The battle against cancer is one of the biggest social problems encountered worldwide, because cancer is one of the most dreadful diseases, and the second leading cause of death in developing as well as developed countries [1,2]. The World Health Organization reported that cancer accounted for 7.6 million deaths (around 13% of all deaths) in 2008, and 13.1 million deaths is estimated for 2030. In the past few decades, various drugs have been developed in cancer research to reduce mortality and improve survival of cancer patients. However, the majority of these studies failed because of low selectivity and frequency of adverse events. Therefore, the development of novel anticancer agents that selectively act on the target without side effects has become a primary objective for medicinal chemists [3]. A dramatic increase in the investigation of naturally occurring products in terms of their potential for treating cancers is recently observed [4]. One promising group of natural products for cancer therapy comprises the flavonoids. These compounds play an important role in cancer treatment. Multiple epidemiological studies have reported that flavonoids can reduce or prevent the incidence of various cancers [5,6]. For instance, quercetin was reported to induce apoptosis via the mitochondrial pathway in KB and KBv200 cells [7]. Valdameri et al. discovered that chalcones are selective inhibitors of the breast cancer resistance protein [8].

Flavonoids are important natural products that are universally found in fruits, cereals, legumes, vegetables, seeds, spices, and medicinal plants [9]. Apigenin (1), a type of flavonoid, is abundant in various fruits, vegetables, and medicinal plants, such as parsley, onion, orange, paper mulberry, Veronica linariifolia, and Rhizoma Polygoni Cuspidati [ 10]. Apigenin is widely distributed and also found to be useful as pharmaceutical agents. In addition to its anti-inflammatory and antioxidation activities, apigenin has been used as a dietary supplement because of its anticancer properties [11]. Previous studies have shown that apigenin has anticancer activity in numerous human cancer cells, such as prostate cancer, colon carcinoma, and breast cancer, with low cytotoxicity and no mutagenic activity [12].

Multi-drug resistance is drawing much attention in recent years because of the extensive use of antibiotics. The resistant strains curtail the life span of drugs. These shortcomings lead to an urgent global need for finding new antimicrobial drugs, particularly from natural resources [13]. Naturally derived apigenin was reported to have potential antimicrobial activity [14]. Meanwhile, various compounds possessing aminoalkylation at the 7-O position have been shown to have significant biological activities [15,16]. In view of these findings and in continuation of our study on apigenin, we report the synthesis of two series of apigenin derivatives, in which the apigenin ring system is linked to different amines separated by 2-carbon or 3-carbon spacers at C-7 position to enhance their lipophilicity. The antiproliferative activities of these derivatives were tested against four human cancer cell lines, namely, the human lung (A549), human cervical (HeLa), human hepatocellular liver (HepG2), and human breast (MCF-7) cancer cells, using a standard 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. The antibacterial activities of these derivatives were also investigated.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

The synthesis of compounds 3a–3j and 4a–4j was accomplished according to the general pathway illustrated in Scheme 1. Compounds 2a and 2b were the key intermediates for the synthesis of the target compounds. They were prepared from alkylation of 7-hydroxy group using excessive amounts of 1,2-dibromoethane or 1,3-dibromopropane in the presence of potassium carbonate (K₂CO₃) as base in anhydrous N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) at 120 °C for 2 h [17,18,19,20]. To increase the biological activities of apigenin, we synthesized apigenin derivatives, in which the apigenin ring system was linked to the alkyl amines moieties by different spacers at C-7 position to enhance their lipophilicity. Reaction of 2a and 2b with different cyclic and non-cyclic alkyl amines in anhydrous DMF at 80 °C for 2 h to 4 h yielded 3a–3j and 4a–4j, respectively. Compounds in series 1 (3a–3j) contained a 2-carbon spacer between apigenin and the substituent moieties, whereas compounds in series 2 (4a–4j) contained a 3-carbon spacer. These compounds were designated to test the importance of the substitution, together with the size of the connected groups. All synthetic compounds gave satisfactory analytical and spectroscopic data, which were in full accordance with their depicted structures.

Scheme 1. Synthesis of C-7-modified apigenin derivatives.

Reagents and conditions: (i) BrCH₂CH₂Br or BrCH₂CH₂CH₂Br, K₂CO₃, DMF, 120 °C, 2 h; (ii) R-amines, DMF, 80 °C, 2 h to 4 h.

2.2. Antibacterial Activity

All synthesized compounds were preliminary screened for their in vitro antibacterial activity against two Gram-positive bacteria [Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 25923) and Bacillus subtilis (ATCC 6633)] and two Gram-negative bacteria [Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ATCC 27853)] through disk diffusion method [21]. Ampicillin and tetracycline were used as positive controls [22], and dimethylsulphoxide (DMSO)-poured disk was used as negative control. Most of the synthesized compounds displayed moderate to excellent antibacterial activities against the four bacteria used at a dose of 1,000 μg/mL (Table 1). Compounds showing inhibition zones of at least 10 mm were considered active and were further evaluated for their minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) [23].

Table 1. Inhibition zones (IZ, in millimeters) (mean ^a ± SD ^b) of the synthesized apigenin derivatives.

**Table 1.** Inhibition zones (IZ, in millimeters) (mean ^a ± SD ^b) of the synthesized apigenin derivatives.
Compounds	S. aureus	B. subtilis	E. coli	P. aeruginosa
Compounds	ATCC 25923	ATCC 6633	ATCC 25922	ATCC 27853
Apigenin (1)	11.1 ± 0.3	11.0 ± 1.0	10.1 ± 0.3	10.3 ± 0.2
2a	11.8 ± 0.2	11.2 ± 0.3	10.2 ± 0.1	10.5 ± 0.2
2b	11.5 ± 0.1	11.3 ± 0.5	11.8 ± 0.3	11.9 ± 0.2
3a	17.0 ± 0.9	17.5 ± 0.4	12.5 ± 0.2	14.0 ± 0.3
3b	17.3 ± 0.3	16.5 ± 0.5	15.5 ± 0.4	14.8 ± 0.4
3c	17.1 ± 0.5	17.5 ± 0.3	17.0 ± 0.3	19.5 ± 0.5
3d	17.3 ± 0.1	17.5 ± 0.2	16.0 ± 0.3	17.5 ± 0.3
3e	17.5 ± 0.7	19.0 ± 0.8	16.5 ± 0.5	15.5 ± 0.2
3f	17.2 ± 0.4	17.5 ± 0.5	14.5 ± 0.4	15.0 ± 0.3
3g	21.0 ± 0.2	21.5 ± 0.7	15.5 ± 0.4	17.5 ± 0.4
3h	21.4 ± 0.8	21.6 ± 0.9	15.0 ± 0.6	17.2 ± 0.5
3i	21.7 ± 1.0	21.8 ± 1.0	19.0 ± 0.6	18.5 ± 0.6
3j	21.2 ± 0.5	21.0 ± 0.6	16.5 ± 0.2	17.5 ± 0.4
4a	21.0 ± 0.4	20.0 ± 0.4	15.0 ± 0.3	15.0 ± 0.3
4b	18.5 ± 0.3	19.0 ± 0.4	16.0 ± 0.1	17.5 ± 0.5
4c	21.1 ± 0.6	21.8 ± 0.5	18.0 ± 0.4	19.0 ± 0.6
4d	22.0 ± 0.8	20.0 ± 0.3	18.0 ± 0.3	21.0 ± 0.8
4e	18.1 ± 0.2	21.0 ± 0.2	17.5 ± 0.3	15.5 ± 0.7
4f	21.0 ± 0.7	17.5 ± 0.3	18.0 ± 0.5	17.5 ± 0.5
4g	21.9 ± 0.9	18.0 ± 0.2	18.5 ± 0.6	18.7 ± 0.9
4h	21.6 ± 1.0	19.0 ± 0.5	17.0 ± 0.4	17.6 ± 0.6
4i	24.8 ± 1.0	22.0 ± 0.7	21.0 ± 0.3	21.3 ± 1.0
4j	24.5 ± 0.8	21.5 ± 0.6	17.5 ± 0.3	18.0 ± 0.9
Ampicillin	37.3 ± 0.6	36.7 ± 1.5	28.9 ± 0.1	33.7 ± 0.5
Tetracycline	26.3 ± 0.5	21.0 ± 1.0	21.7 ± 1.1	24.3 ± 1.1

^a Mean value of measured diameters of IZs; ^b SD denotes standard deviation.

The MIC values are listed in Table 2. All synthesized apigenin derivatives showed higher antibacterial activities than the parent apigenin. They exhibited relatively better inhibition of Gram-positive bacteria than Gram-negative bacteria, with MIC values from 1.95 μg/mL to 15.63 μg/mL. Among 3a–3j, which contained a 2-carbon spacer, 3g–3j with N-heterocyclic rings at C-7 position displayed a potent zone of antibacterial activities ranging from 3.91 μg/mL to 15.63 μg/mL. In addition, 3i exhibited prominent antibacterial activity with MICs of 3.91, 3.91, 7.81, and 7.81 μg/mL against S. aureus, B. subtilis, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa, respectively. These results were close to the antibacterial property of broad-spectrum, antibiotic tetracycline, with corresponding MICs of 1.95, 3.91, 3.91, and 3.91 μg/mL, respectively. Other 2-carbon spacer compounds (3a–3f), with aliphatic chain substituents, showed lower inhibitory activity than 3g–3j. This result suggested that compounds with heterocyclic moieties at C-7 position of apigenin had much higher activity than compounds with aliphatic chains. Compounds 4a–4j exhibited similar results. The N-heterocyclic rings displaced 4g–4j, which showed better antibacterial activity than other compounds, namely, 4a–4f, in 3-carbon spacer apigenin derivatives. Additionally, 4i presented remarkable inhibitory activity with MIC values of 1.95, 3.91, 3.91, and 3.91 μg/mL against S. aureus, B. subtilis, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa, respectively, which is comparable with the positive control, tetracycline (1.95, 3.91, 3.91, and 3.91 μg/mL), although lower than ampicillin (0.06, 0.12, 0.98, and 0.49 μg/mL) [22]. Compounds 4a–4j, which contained a 3-carbon spacer, showed higher antibacterial activity than 3a–3j. This phenomenon may have been caused by the superior lipophilicity of 4a–4j to 3a–3j, which may have increased cell membrane permeability. The biological activity of a particular substance depends on a complex sum of individual properties including compound structure, affinity for the target site, and survival in the medium of application, survival within the biological system, transport properties, and state of the target organism [17]. Further structure-activity relationships (SARs) studies on this class of antibacterial compounds are currently under active investigation and will be reported in due course.

Table 2. MIC values of the synthesized apigenin derivatives against four bacterial strains.

**Table 2.** MIC values of the synthesized apigenin derivatives against four bacterial strains.
Compounds	MIC (μg/mL) ^a
Compounds	S. aureus ATCC 25923	B. subtilis ATCC 6633	E. coli ATCC 25922	P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853
Apigenin (1)	31.25	31.25	62.5	62.5
2a	31.25	31.25	62.5	62.5
2b	31.25	31.25	31.25	31.25
3a	7.81	7.81	31.25	15.63
3b	7.81	15.63	15.63	15.63
3c	7.81	7.81	15.63	7.81
3d	7.81	7.81	15.63	7.81
3e	7.81	7.81	15.63	15.63
3f	7.81	7.81	15.63	15.63
3g	3.91	3.91	15.63	7.81
3h	3.91	3.91	15.63	7.81
3i	3.91	3.91	7.81	7.81
3j	3.91	3.91	15.63	7.81
4a	3.91	7.81	15.63	15.63
4b	7.81	7.81	15.63	7.81
4c	3.91	3.91	7.81	7.81
4d	3.91	3.91	7.81	3.91
4e	7.81	3.91	7.81	15.63
4f	3.91	7.81	7.81	7.81
4g	3.91	7.81	7.81	7.81
4h	3.91	7.81	7.81	7.81
4i	1.95	3.91	3.91	3.91
4j	1.95	3.91	7.81	7.81
Ampicillin	0.06	0.12	0.98	0.49
Tetracycline	1.95	3.91	3.91	3.91

^a Average of three parallel experiments.

2.3. Antiproliferative Activity

The inhibitory effects of all the synthesized apigenin derivatives, 3a–3j and 4a–4j, were assayed by evaluating cell proliferation on A549, HeLa, HepG2, and MCF-7 cell lines. The results are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3. Antiproliferative activities (IC₅₀) of the synthesized apigenin derivatives against A549, HeLa, HepG2, and MCF-7 cell lines.

**Table 3.** Antiproliferative activities (IC₅₀) of the synthesized apigenin derivatives against A549, HeLa, HepG2, and MCF-7 cell lines.
Compounds	IC₅₀ (μg/mL)
Compounds	A549	HeLa	HepG2	MCF-7
Apigenin (1)	1,740 ± 3.4	450 ± 2.0	460 ± 2.2	>2,000 ± 3.6
2a	643 ± 4.2	590 ± 4.1	408 ± 3.8	534 ± 3.4
2b	251 ± 3.4	233 ± 2.2	176 ± 2.1	209 ± 2.8
3a	101 ± 3.0	110 ± 2.0	116 ± 2.3	125 ± 2.2
3b	94 ± 2.5	109 ± 1.9	103 ± 1.9	102 ± 2.1
3c	87 ± 2.2	98 ± 1.5	105 ± 1.4	114 ± 1.9
3d	80 ± 1.5	117 ± 2.1	112 ± 2.0	137 ± 2.6
3e	78 ± 1.6	97 ± 1.8	92 ± 1.8	99 ± 2.0
3f	83 ± 2.3	89 ± 1.4	96 ± 1.5	92 ± 2.0
3g	42 ± 2.1	32 ± 1.2	33 ± 1.2	71 ± 1.2
3h	45 ± 1.7	46 ± 1.0	43 ± 1.7	70 ± 1.8
3i	39 ± 0.9	42 ± 0.9	36 ± 1.0	54 ± 1.1
3j	26 ± 1.0	17 ± 0.8	29 ± 1.2	49 ± 1.4
4a	91 ± 2.4	99 ± 2.3	100 ± 2.8	99 ± 2.1
4b	85 ± 2.1	83 ± 1.7	94 ± 2.2	87 ± 2.3
4c	72 ± 1.8	81 ± 1.3	82 ± 1.8	95 ± 2.8
4d	63 ± 1.1	101 ± 2.6	83 ± 1.7	103 ± 3.1
4e	62 ± 1.5	86 ± 2.0	90 ± 2.0	88 ± 2.9
4f	70 ± 2.2	75 ± 1.3	89 ± 1.4	89 ± 3.3
4g	32 ± 1.4	27 ± 1.1	31 ± 1.0	59 ± 2.0
4h	35 ± 2.0	34 ± 1.5	44 ± 1.2	50 ± 2.3
4i	27 ± 1.3	19 ± 1.0	28 ± 1.1	47 ± 1.9
4j	16 ± 1.0	11 ± 1.1	25 ± 1.6	32 ± 1.8

All the synthesized derivatives, 3a–3j and 4a–4j, showed relatively higher antiproliferative activity compared with the parent apigenin. Compounds 3a–3j, which contained a 2-carbon spacer, had moderate activities against the four selected cancer cell lines. In this series, 3g–3j, with half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC₅₀) ranging from 17 μg/mL to 71 μg/mL, showed better activities than 3a–3f. Notable effect was exerted by 3j, which had the lowest IC₅₀ values against the four cancer cells, especially against HeLa cells (IC₅₀ = 17 μg/mL). Similarly, in 4a–4j, 4g–4j exhibited stronger activities than 4a–4f. Compound 4j showed notable activity against the four cancer cell lines. As shown in Table 3, compared with the compounds with 2-carbon spacer, 3-carbon-spacer-containing compounds 4a–4j, showed a slight increase in antiproliferative activity against the four cancer cell lines. This result may have been caused by the elongation of the alkyl side chain from two to three C-atoms that retained the modulating activity, with C₃-bridge derivatives being the most active [15]. The compounds containing N-heterocyclic-ring amino side chains (3g–3j and 4g–4j) displayed better activities against the four cancer cell lines than those containing alkyl amino side chains. As reference [15] described, this result may be attributed to the increasing lipophilicity of these compounds, which could influence their ability to reach the target via transmembrane diffusion. In most cases, the presence or introduction of various functional groups in a compound does not allow to accurately explain the type and intensity of its biological activity [15]. So further studies on the mechanism of action will be in the succeeding work.

3. Experimental

3.1. General

Reagents and solvents were purchased commercially and used without further purification, unless otherwise stated. Reactions were monitored by thin layer chromatography, performed on silica gel glass plates (GF₂₅₄, Qingdao Haiyang Chemical Co., Ltd., Shandong, China). Plates were visualized under UV light using ZF-6 type III UV analyzer (Shanghai Jiapeng Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China). Column chromatography was performed on silica gel (200–300 mesh) to purify the compounds. Melting points were measured using a digital melting point apparatus (Zhengzhou Mingze Technology Co., Ltd, Zhengzhou, China) and were uncorrected. The NMR spectra were obtained using a Bruker Avance DMX 500 MHz or 400 MHz instrument (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). ¹H-NMR (500 or 400 MHz) and ¹³C-NMR (125 or 100 MHz) were run in deuterated DMSO (DMSO-d₆). Chemical shifts were related to those of the solvent. Mass spectra (MS) were acquired using electrospray ionization (ESI) technique on a Thermo Scientific LCQ FLEET mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). MIC was detected using BIO-RAD 680 microplate reader (Beijing Yuanye Bio Co., Ltd, Beijing, China). Deionized water (Milli-Q, Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) was used to prepare aqueous solutions. Primary and secondary amines were obtained from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). DMF was purified by distillation under vacuum over CaH₂ before utilization. Apigenin (>98%) was purchased from Xi’an Spring-chem Bio-tech Co., Ltd. (Xi’an, Shaanxi, China) and was used without further purification. Ampicillin and MTT were purchased from Amersco Inc. (Solon, OH, USA). Tetracycline was acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). Yeast extract and tryptone were obtained from Oxoid Ltd. (Basingstoke, Hampshire, UK).

Apigenin (1). Yellow powder, m.p. 347–348 °C; ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 6.20 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-6), 6.48 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-8), 6.79 (1H, s, H-3), 6.93 (2H, d, J = 10.0 Hz, H-3′ and H-5′), 7.93 (2H, d, J = 10.0 Hz, H-2′ and H-6′), 10.35 (1H, s, 4′-OH), 10.82 (1H, s, 7-OH), 12.97 (1H, s, 5-OH). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 94.87, 99.74, 103.76, 104.61, 116.87, 122.09, 129.39, 158.22, 162.08, 162.37, 164.65, 165.04, 182.66. ESI-MS (−) for C₁₅H₁₀O₅: [M-H]^–_(found) = 269.0 [M-H]^–_(calcd) = 269.0.

3.2. Synthesis of Compounds 2a, 2b, 3a–3j, and 4a–4j

7-(2-Bromoethoxy)-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2a). To a solution of 1 (1.35 g, 5 mmol) in 100 mL of anhydrous DMF, 1,2-dibromoethane (23.5 g, 125 mmol) and anhydrous potassium carbonate (0.7 g, 5 mmol) were added, followed by heating at 120 °C for 2 h. After the completion of reaction, the resulting mixture was cooled to room temperature and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated, and the residue was purified by column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 2:1) to obtain 2a in 70% yield, pale yellow needle, m.p. 226–228 °C; ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 3.86 (t, 2H, OCH₂CH₂, J = 5.3 Hz), 4.47 (t, 2H, OCH₂CH₂, J = 5.3 Hz), 6.42 (d, 1H, 6-H, J = 2.1 Hz), 6.84 (d, 1H, 8-H, J = 2.1 Hz), 6.88 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.95 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.98 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 10.41 (s, 1H, 4’-OH), 12.99 (s, 1H, 5-OH). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 31.37, 68.91, 93.76, 98.83, 103.49, 105.39, 116.45, 121.48, 129.05, 157.64, 161.70, 161.79, 164.09, 164.62, 182.39. ESI-MS (−) for C₁₇H₁₃BrO₅: [M-H]^–_(found) = 376.0 [M-H]^–_(calcd) = 376.0.

7-(3-Bromopropoxy)-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (2b). To a solution of 1 (1.35 g, 5 mmol) in 100 mL of anhydrous DMF, 1,3-dibromopropane (25.5 g, 125 mmol) and anhydrous potassium carbonate (0.7 g, 5 mmol) were added, followed by heating at 120 °C for 2 h. After the completion of reaction, the resulting mixture was cooled to room temperature and filtered. The filtrate was concentrated and the residue was purified using column chromatography (petroleum ether/ethyl acetate = 2:1) to obtain 2b in 68% yield, pale yellow needle, m.p. 204–205 °C; ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 2.29 (m, 2H, OCH₂CH₂CH₂), 3.69 (t, 2H, OCH₂CH₂CH₂, J = 5.0 Hz), 4.21 (s, 2H, OCH₂CH₂CH₂), 6.38 (s, 1H, 6-H), 6.80 (s, 1H, 8-H), 6.85 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.95 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.96 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 7.9 Hz), 12.97 (s, 1H, 5-OH). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 31.47, 32.01, 66.70, 93.53, 98.81, 103.39, 105.24, 116.50, 121.29, 129.02, 157.68, 161.66, 162.09, 164.58, 164.66, 182.37. ESI-MS (−) for C₁₈H₁₅BrO₅: [M-H]^–_(found) = 390.1 [M-H]^–_(calcd) = 390.0.

7-[2-(Diethylamino)ethoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (3a). To a solution of 2a (0.37 g, 1 mmol) in 30 mL of anhydrous DMF, diethylamine (0.73 g, 10 mmol) was added, followed by heating at 80 °C for 3 h. The solvent was evaporated, and the residue was purified using column chromatography to obtain 3a in 70% yield, pale yellow powder, m.p. 237–238 °C; ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 0.98 (t, 6H, N(CH₂CH₃)₂, J = 7.0 Hz), 2.56 (q, 4H, N(CH₂CH₃)₂, J = 7.0 Hz), 2.80 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 5.4 Hz), 4.13 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 5.4 Hz), 6.33 (s, 1H, 6-H), 6.76 (s, 1H, 8-H), 6.81 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.93 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.94 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.4 Hz). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 12.27, 47.38, 51.49, 67.66, 93.51, 98.74, 103.28, 105.06, 116.52, 121.23, 128.98, 157.65, 161.61, 162.14, 164.55, 164.82, 182.31. ESI-MS (-) for C₂₁H₂₃NO₅: [M-H]^–_(found) = 368.2 [M-H]^–_(calcd) = 368.1.

7-[2-(Ethylamino)ethoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (3b). Prepared as described for 3a, with 2a (0.37 g, 1 mmol) and ethylamine (0.45 g, 10 mmol). Yield 67%, pale yellow powder, m.p. 202–203 °C; ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 1.23 (t, 3H, NCH₂CH₃, J = 7.2 Hz), 2.99 (q, 2H, NCH₂CH₃, J = 7.2 Hz), 3.31 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 4.9 Hz), 4.36 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 4.9 Hz), 6.41 (s, 1H, 6-H), 6.80 (s, 1H, 8-H), 6.83 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.95 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.94 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 11.93, 43.08, 46.02, 65.13, 93.61, 98.96, 103.51, 105.51, 116.45, 121.40, 128.91, 157.62, 161.69, 161.85, 163.92, 164.67, 182.35. ESI-MS (−) for C₁₉H₁₉NO₅: [M-H]^–_(found) = 340.0 [M-H]^–_(calcd) = 340.1.

7-[2-(Propylamino)ethoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (3c). Prepared as described for 3a, with 2a (0.37 g, 1 mmol) and propylamine (0.59 g, 10 mmol). Yield 75%, pale yellow powder, m.p. 242–244 °C; ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 0.94 (t, 3H, NCH₂CH₂CH₃, J = 7.4 Hz), 1.63–1.68 (m, 2H, NCH₂CH₂CH₃), 2.96 (t, 2H, NCH₂CH₂CH₃, J = 7.4 Hz), 3.37 (t, 2 H, CH₂, J = 5.0 Hz), 4.38 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 5.0 Hz), 6.45 (d, 1H, 6-H, J = 2.1 Hz), 6.86 (d, 1H, 8-H, J = 2.1 Hz), 6.90 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.96 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.99 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 12.92 (s, 1H, 5-OH). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 11.47, 19.72, 46.26, 49.41, 64.99, 93.77, 99.01, 103.59, 105.51, 116.49, 121.44, 129.10, 157.64, 161.66, 161.88, 163.93, 164.69, 182.44. ESI-MS (−) for C₂₀H₂₁NO₅: [M-H]^–_(found) = 354.1 [M-H]^–_(calcd) = 354.3.

7-[2-(n-Butylamino)ethoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (3d). Prepared as described for 3a, with 2a (0.37 g, 1 mmol) and n-butylamine (0.73 g, 10 mmol). Yield 73%, pale yellow powder, m.p. 247–248 °C; ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 0.92 (t, 3H, NCH₂CH₂CH₂CH₃, J = 7.4 Hz), 1.34–1.38 (m, 4H, NCH₂CH₂CH₂CH₃), 1.58 (t, 2H, NCH₂CH₂CH₂CH₃, J = 7.4 Hz), 2.91 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 7.5 Hz), 4.34 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 7.5 Hz), 6.44 (d, 1H, 6-H, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.85 (d, 1H, 8-H, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.90 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.96 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 7.99 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 12.91 (s, 1H, 5-OH). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 14.08, 19.92, 28.89, 46.62, 47.87, 65.64, 93.73, 98.99, 103.56, 105.43, 116.49, 121.45, 129.07, 157.65, 161.64, 161.88, 164.11, 164.67, 182.41. ESI-MS (−) for C₂₁H₂₃NO₅: [M-H]^–_(found) = 368.1 [M-H]^–_(calcd) = 368.1.

7-[2-(tert-Butylamino)ethoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (3e). Prepared as described for 3a, with 2a (0.37 g, 1 mmol) and tert-butylamine (0.73 g, 10 mmol). Yield 71%, pale yellow powder, m.p. 263–265 °C; ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 1.34(s, 9H, (CH₃)₃), 2.91 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 5.0 Hz), 4.38 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 5.0 Hz), 6.46 (d, 1H, 6-H, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.87 (d, 1H, 8-H, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.91 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.96 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 8.00 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.7 Hz), 13.03 (s, 1H, 5-OH). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 25.64, 27.61, 51.61, 65.26, 93.81, 99.01, 103.58, 105.53, 116.49, 121.43, 129.10, 157.64, 161.66, 161.89, 163.94, 164.72, 182.43. ESI-MS (−) for C₂₁H₂₃NO₅: [M-H]^–_(found) = 368.1 [M-H]^–_(calcd) = 368.1.

7-[2-(2′-Hydroxyethylamino)ethoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (3f). Prepared as described for 3a, with 2a (0.37 g, 1 mmol) and ethanolamine (0.61 g, 10 mmol). Yield 73%, pale yellow powder, m.p. 224–226 °C; ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 3.10 (s, 2H, NCH₂CH₂OH), 3.38 (s, 2H, NCH₂CH₂OH), 3.70 (s, 2H, CH₂), 4.41 (s, 2H, CH₂), 6.44 (s, 1H, 6-H), 6.86 (s, 1H, 8-H), 6.89 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.96 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.98 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.5 Hz), 12.97 (s, 1H, 5-OH). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 46.28, 49.90, 57.08, 64.97, 93.78, 99.03, 103.48, 105.49, 116.49, 121.44, 129.08, 157.65, 161.65, 161.89, 163.96, 164.68, 182.43. ESI-MS (−) for C₁₉H₁₉NO₆: [M-H]^–_(found) = 356.1 [M-H]^–_(calcd) = 356.1.

7-[2-(Cyclohexylamino)ethoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (3g). Prepared as described for 3a, with 2a (0.37 g, 1 mmol) and cyclohexylamine (0.99 g, 10 mmol). Yield 68%, pale yellow powder, m.p. 269–270 °C; ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 1.13 (d, 2H, CH₂, J = 10.0 Hz), 1.26–1.29 (m, 6H), 1.63 (d, 2H, CH₂, J = 10.0 Hz), 2.05 (s, 2H, CH₂), 3.00 (d, 2H, CH₂, J = 5.0 Hz), 4.35 (d, 2H, CH₂, J = 4.9 Hz), 6.44 (d, 1H, 6-H, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.86 (d, 1H, 8-H, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.90 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.96 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.99 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 12.92 (s, 1H, 5-OH). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 24.49, 25.37, 30.84, 43.55, 49.79, 56.88, 93.76, 98.97, 103.60, 105.49, 116.48, 121.45, 129.10, 157.65, 161.67, 161.88, 164.04, 164.68, 182.44. ESI-MS (−) for C₂₃H₂₅NO₅: [M-H]^–_(found) = 394.1 [M-H]^–_(calcd) = 394.2.

7-[2-(Pyrrolidin-1-yl)ethoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (3h). Prepared as described for 3a, with 2a (0.37 g, 1 mmol) and pyrrolidine (0.71 g, 10 mmol). Yield 70%, pale yellow powder, m.p. 252–254 °C; ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 1.90 (br s, 2H, CH₂), 2.01 (s, 4H), 3.14 (s, 2H, CH₂), 3.64 (s, 2H, CH₂), 4.46 (s, 2H, CH₂), 6.44 (d, 1H, 6-H, J = 1.8 Hz), 6.78 (d, 2H, 8-H, 3-H, J = 1.8 Hz), 6.94 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.90 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 10.27 (s, 1H, 4’-OH), 12.98 (s, 1H, 5-OH). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 22.63, 44.89, 52.77, 54.03, 93.19, 98.40, 103.11, 105.22, 115.95, 120.97, 128.30, 157.15, 161.39, 161.46, 163.09, 164.24, 181.88. ESI-MS (−) for C₂₁H₂₁NO₅: [M-H]^–_(found) = 366.1 [M-H]^–_(calcd) = 366.1.

7-[2-(Morpholin-4-yl)ethoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (3i). Prepared as described for 3a, with 2a (0.37 g, 1 mmol) and morpholine (0.87 g, 10 mmol). Yield 75%, pale yellow powder, m.p. 199–200 °C; ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 2.74 (s, 4H), 2.90 (s, 2H, CH₂), 3.59 (d, 4H, J = 5.6 Hz), 4.22 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 5.6 Hz), 6.39 (s, 1H, 6-H), 6.81 (s, 1H, 8-H), 6.86 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.95 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.5 Hz), 7.97 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.5 Hz), 10.41 (s, 1H, 4’-OH), 12.96 (s, 1H, 5-OH). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 45.58, 54.02, 57.14, 66.64, 93.67, 98.84, 103.49, 105.15, 116.45, 121.55, 129.02, 157.67, 161.79, 162.78, 163.76, 164.76, 182.38. ESI-MS (−) for C₂₁H₂₁NO₆: [M-H]^–_(found) = 382.1 [M-H]^–_(calcd) = 382.1.

7-[2-(Piperazin-1-yl)ethoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (3j). Prepared as described for 3a, with 2a (0.37 g, 1 mmol) and piperazine (0.86 g, 10 mmol). Yield 65%, pale yellow powder, m.p. 229–230 °C; ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 2.81 (s, 2H, CH₂), 2.84–2.86 (m, 1H, NH), 2.91 (d, 2H, CH₂, J = 5.3 Hz), 3.09 (s, 4H), 3.46 (d, 2H, CH₂, J = 4.3 Hz), 4.23 (s, 2H, CH₂), 6.39 (s, 1H, 6-H), 6.81 (s, 1H, 8-H), 6.87 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.96 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.97 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.6 Hz), 12.95 (s, 1H, 5-OH). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 43.49, 50.13, 56.32, 66.81, 93.71, 98.86, 103.49, 105.18, 116.48, 121.47, 129.02, 157.67, 161.49, 161.65, 164.56, 164.64, 182.38. ESI-MS (−) for C₂₁H₂₂N₂O₅: [M-H]^–_(found) = 381.1 [M-H]^–_(calcd) = 381.1.

7-[3-(Diethylamino)propoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (4a). Prepared as described for 3a, with 2b (0.39 g, 1 mmol) and diethylamino (0.73 g, 10 mmol). Yield 73%, pale yellow powder, m.p. 227–229 °C; ¹H-NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 1.24 (t, 6H, N(CH₂CH₃)₂, J = 7.1 Hz), 2.15 (s, 2H, CH₂), 3.17–3.22 (m, 6H), 4.21 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 5.8 Hz), 6.39 (s, 1H, 6-H), 6.79 (s, 1H, 8-H), 6.86 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.96 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.6 Hz), 7.97 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.6 Hz), 10.42 (s, 1H, 4’-OH), 12.98 (s, 1H, 5-OH). ¹³C-NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 9.16, 23.55, 46.93, 48.28, 66.13, 93.67, 98.77, 103.51, 105.25, 116.46, 121.47, 129.02, 157.63, 161.69, 161.83, 164.45, 164.58, 182.38. ESI-MS (+) for C₂₂H₂₅NO₅: [M+H]⁺_(found) = 384.2 [M+H]⁺_(calcd) = 384.2.

7-[3-(Ethylamino)propoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (4b). Prepared as described for 3a, with 2b (0.39 g, 1 mmol) and ethylamine (0.45 g, 10 mmol). Yield 75%, pale yellow powder, m.p. 226–228 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 1.20 (t, 3H, NCH₂CH₃, J = 7.2 Hz), 2.11 (q, 2H, NCH₂CH₃, J = 7.2 Hz), 2.95–3.01 (m, 2H, CH₂), 3.06 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 6.0 Hz), 4.21 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 6.0 Hz), 6.39 (d, 1H, 6-H, J = 2.2 Hz), 6.79 (d, 1H, 8-H, J = 2.2 Hz), 6.87 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.95 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.96 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz). ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 11.60, 25.87, 42.58, 44.04, 66.09, 93.67, 98.81, 103.49, 105.21, 116.48, 121.45, 129.03, 157.64, 161.66, 161.84, 164.51, 164.59, 182.39. ESI-MS (+) for C₂₀H₂₁NO₅: [M+H]⁺_(found) = 356.1 [M+H]⁺_(calcd) = 356.1.

7-[3-(Propylamino)propoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (4c). Prepared as described for 3a, with 2b (0.39 g, 1 mmol) and propylamine (0.59 g, 10 mmol). Yield 78%, pale yellow powder, m.p. 220–221 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 0.93 (t, 3H, NCH₂CH₂CH₃, J = 7.4 Hz), 1.59–1.68 (m, 2H, CH₂), 2.08–2.15 (m, 2H, CH₂), 2.90 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 7.4 Hz), 3.08 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 6.1 Hz), 4.21 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 6.1 Hz), 6.39 (d, 1H, 6-H, J = 2.2 Hz), 6.78 (d, 1H, 8-H, J = 2.2 Hz), 6.86 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.95 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.96 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 12.97 (s, 1H, 5-OH). ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 11.40, 19.54, 25.73, 44.51, 48.97, 66.09, 93.68, 98.81, 103.51, 105.22, 116.48, 121.47, 129.02, 157.65, 161.66, 161.82, 164.50, 164.61, 182.38. ESI-MS (+) for C₂₁H₂₃NO₅: [M+H]⁺_(found) = 370.1 [M+H]⁺_(calcd) = 370.2.

7-[3-(n-Butylamino)propoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (4d). Prepared as described for 3a, with 2b (0.39 g, 1 mmol) and n-butylamine (0.73 g, 10 mmol). Yield 71%, pale yellow powder, m.p. 246–248 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 0.91 (t, 3H, NCH₂CH₂CH₂CH₃, J = 7.3 Hz), 1.32–1.37 (m, 2H, CH₂), 1.55–1.62 (m, 2H, CH₂), 2.09–2.12 (m, 2H, CH₂), 2.93 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 7.3 Hz), 3.08 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 6.0 Hz), 4.20 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 6.0 Hz), 6.38 (d, 1H, 6-H, J = 2.1 Hz), 6.79 (d, 1H, 8-H, J = 2.1 Hz), 6.86 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.95 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.96 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz). ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 13.98, 19.75, 25.79, 28.10, 44.55, 47.16, 66.09, 93.66, 98.79, 103.59, 105.21, 116.47, 121.45, 129.02, 157.63, 161.65, 161.82, 164.49, 164.58, 182.38. ESI-MS (+) for C₂₂H₂₅NO₅: [M+H]⁺_(found) = 384.1 [M+H]⁺_(calcd) = 384.2.

7-[3-(tert-Butylamino)propoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (4e). Prepared as described for 3a, with 2b (0.39 g, 1 mmol) and tert-butylamine (0.73 g, 10 mmol). Yield 69%, pale yellow powder, m.p. 163–165 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 1.32 [s, 9H, (CH₃)₃], 2.14 (s, 2H, CH₂), 3.06 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 6.1 Hz), 4.23 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 6.1 Hz), 6.40 (s, 1H, 6-H), 6.80 (s, 1H, 8-H), 6.86 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.95 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.96 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 12.97 (s, 1H, 5-OH). ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 25.65, 26.41, 56.80, 58.35, 66.09, 93.70, 98.78, 103.49, 105.21, 116.46, 121.46, 129.02, 157.63, 161.68, 161.82, 164.50, 164.57, 182.38. ESI-MS (+) for C₂₂H₂₅NO₅: [M+H]⁺_(found) = 384.1 [M+H]⁺_(calcd) = 384.2.

7-[3-(2′-Hydroxyethylamino)propoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (4f). Prepared as described for 3a, with 2b (0.39 g, 1 mmol) and ethanolamine (0.61 g, 10 mmol). Yield 67%, pale yellow powder, m.p. 244–246 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 2.15 (t, 2H, NCH₂CH₂OH, J = 5.2 Hz), 3.05 (t, 2H, NCH₂CH₂OH, J = 5.2 Hz), 3.12–3.15 (m, 2H, CH₂), 3.69 (s, 2H, CH₂), 4.21 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 6.0 Hz), 6.38 (d, 1H, 6-H, J = 2.1 Hz), 6.79 (d, 1H, 8-H, J = 2.1 Hz), 6.85 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.96 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.96 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 12.96 (s, 1H, 5-OH). ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 44.65, 49.49, 56.81, 60.16, 66.22, 93.69, 98.83, 103.52, 105.23, 116.48, 121.48, 129.01, 157.64, 161.66, 161.84, 164.52, 164.60, 182.37. ESI-MS (+) for C₂₀H₂₁NO₆: [M+H]⁺_(found) = 372.1 [M+H]⁺_(calcd) = 372.1.

7-[3-(Cyclohexylamino)propoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (4g). Prepared as described for 3a, with 2b (0.39 g, 1 mmol) and cyclohexylamine (0.99 g, 10 mmol). Yield 62%, pale yellow powder, m.p. 160–162 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 1.10–1.16 (m, 2H), 1.21–1.34 (m, 6H), 1.76–1.79 (m, 3H), 2.14 (d, 2H, J = 6.4 Hz), 3.10 (t, 2H, J = 6.1 Hz), 4.21 (t, 2H, J = 6.1 Hz), 6.38 (d, 1H, 6-H, J = 2.1 Hz), 6.78 (d, 1H, 8-H, J = 2.1 Hz), 6.84 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.95 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.95 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 12.89 (s, 1H, 5-OH). ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 24.35, 25.23, 29.11, 30.79, 41.38, 56.50, 66.15, 93.67, 98.79, 103.50, 105.22, 116.47, 121.47, 129.00, 157.63, 161.68, 161.83, 164.52, 164.58, 182.36. ESI-MS (+) for C₂₄H₂₇NO₅: [M+H]⁺_(found) = 410.2 [M+H]⁺_(calcd) = 410.2.

7-[3-(Pyrrolidin-1-yl)propoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (4h). Prepared as described for 3a, with 2b (0.39 g, 1 mmol) and pyrrolidine (0.71 g, 10 mmol). Yield 66%, pale yellow powder, m.p. 269–270 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 1.97 (s, 4H), 2.15–2.22 (m, 2H), 2.98 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 6.1 Hz), 3.30–3.33 (m, 4H), 4.21 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 6.1 Hz,), 6.37 (d, 1H, 6-H, J = 2.1 Hz), 6.78 (d, 1H, 8-H, J = 2.1 Hz), 6.85 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.96 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.9 Hz), 7.96 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 10.40 (s, 1H, 4’-OH), 12.97 (s, 1H, 5-OH). ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 23.15, 25.57, 51.63, 53.73, 66.19, 93.64, 98.82, 103.51, 105.25, 116.47, 121.47, 129.01, 157.63, 161.65, 161.83, 164.45, 164.57, 182.37. ESI-MS (+) for C₂₂H₂₃NO₅: [M+H]⁺_(found) = 382.2 [M+H]⁺_(calcd) = 382.2.

7-[3-(Morpholin-4-yl)propoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (4i). Prepared as described for 3a, with 2b (0.39 g, 1 mmol) and morpholine (0.87 g, 10 mmol). Yield 65%, pale yellow powder, m.p. 178–180 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 1.87–1.94 (m, 2H, CH₂), 2.37 (s, 4H), 2.42 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 7.0 Hz), 3.57–3.60 (m, 4H), 4.14 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 6.4 Hz), 6.35 (d, 1H, 6-H, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.76 (d, 1H, 8-H, J = 2.0 Hz), 6.83 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.94 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.96 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 12.94 (s, 1H, 5-OH). ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 26.10, 53.83, 55.07, 66.69, 67.22, 93.48, 98.78, 103.44, 105.09, 116.45, 121.48, 129.01, 157.70, 161.64, 161.86, 164.52, 164.95, 182.36. ESI-MS (−) for C₂₂H₂₃NO₆: [M-H]^–_(found) = 396.1 [M-H]^–_(calcd) = 396.2.

7-[3-(Piperazin-1-yl)propoxy]-5-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-4H-chromen-4-one (4j). Prepared as described for 3a, with 2b (0.39 g, 1 mmol) and piperazine (0.86 g, 10 mmol). Yield 70%, pale yellow powder, m.p. 164–166 °C; ¹H-NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 1.89–1.92 (m, 2H, CH₂), 2.50–2.51 (m, 2H), 2.61 (br s, 4H), 3.08–3.10 (m, 4H), 4.14 (t, 2H, CH₂, J = 6.2 Hz), 6.36 (d, 1H, 6-H, J = 2.1 Hz), 6.76 (d, 1H, 8-H, J = 2.1 Hz,), 6.84 (s, 1H, 3-H), 6.95 (d, 2H, 3′,5′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.96 (d, 2H, 2′,6′-2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 12.94 (s, 1H, 5-OH). ¹³C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d₆) δ: 26.16, 43.48, 49.76, 54.22, 67.05, 93.55, 98.77, 103.47, 105.10, 116.46, 121.50, 129.01, 157.69, 161.64, 161.80, 164.54, 164.91, 182.35. ESI-MS (+) for C₂₂H₂₄N₂O₅: [M+H]⁺_(found) = 397.2 [M+H]⁺_(calcd) = 397.2.

3.3. Antibacterial Assay

Screening of the synthesized compounds for antibacterial activity was performed using the disk diffusion method, according to the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) [23,24], which is normally used as a preliminary test. Prior to the experiment, sterile paper discs (6.0 mm in diameter), impregnated with compound dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 1000 μg/mL, were prepared. Sterile LB agar medium (10 mL) was then mixed with 10 μL of bacterial suspension at 40 °C and poured onto an agar plate. The impregnated paper discs were placed on the surface of the media inoculated with the microorganism. Ampicillin and tetracycline were used as positive controls, and DMSO was used as negative control. After 18 h of incubation at 37 °C, the diameter of the zone of growth inhibition around the disc was measured. The average of three parallel experiments was recorded.

MIC was defined as the lowest concentration of compound in which bacterial growth after incubation was completely inhibited. MIC values for the synthesized compounds were determined by NCCLS method using LB medium in 96-well tissue culture plates [25]. Antibacterial activity was evaluated against two Gram-positive bacteria, namely, S. aureus and B. subtilis, and two Gram-negative bacteria, namely, E. coli and P. aeruginosa. Tetracycline and ampicillin were also used as positive controls. They were dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 2.5 mg/mL, and 20 μL of this solution was pipetted to the first well of each line in 96-well tissue culture plate with 180 μL LB medium. The solution was then serially diluted to afford two-fold serial dilutions of the test compounds and positive controls in the subsequent wells which contain 100 μL LB medium. Afterwards, 100 μL bacterial suspension (10⁶ CFU/mL) was added to each well and kept for incubation. One well containing bacterial cells and DMSO without any test compound was used as growth control, and another well containing only growth medium was used as blank control. The maximum concentration of tested compounds was 125 μg/mL. MIC values were recorded spectrophotometrically in 630 nm after 24 h incubation at 37 °C.

3.4. Antiproliferative Assay

The antiproliferative activities of all the synthesized apigenin derivatives were evaluated against A549, HeLa, HepG2, and MCF-7 cells by MTT staining according to the procedures reported previously [26,27], with slight modification.

Briefly, target cancer cells were grown to log phase in a suitable medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin at 37 °C and 5% CO₂ with 95% humidity. The cells were harvested through trypsinization with 0.25% trypsin in Ca²⁺- and Mg²⁺-free Hanks’ balanced salt solution at 37 °C. Trypsinization was stopped by adding fresh supplemented medium. The cell suspension was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min, and then the cells were resuspended in supplemented medium (1.0 × 10⁶ cells/well in 6-well plates) for further use. Afterward, the cells were seeded into 96-well microtiter plates (4.0 × 10³ cells/well) with fresh medium (150 μL). Subsequent incubation was permitted for 24 h before the antiproliferative assessments. Tested compounds of 150 μL (final concentrations of 62.5, 125, 250, 500, 1,000, or 2,000 μg/mL in the culture medium) were added to each well. After 24 h incubation, MTT (20 μL, 5 mg/mL) was added to each well. After 4 h, DMSO (150 μL) was added to terminate the reaction. The survival rate of the cancer cells was evaluated by measuring the optical density (A) on a microplate reader at 490 nm. All in vitro results were expressed as the cancer cell proliferation inhibition ratio according to the following formula:

[(A_control − A_test)/A_control] × 100%

where A_control and A_test are the optical densities of the control and the test groups, respectively. All tests were performed in triplicate.

4. Conclusions

In summary, two series of apigenin derivatives, which contains 2- or 3-carbon spacers, were synthesized, and their antibacterial and antiproliferative activities were assessed. Most of the synthesized derivatives showed potential antibacterial and antiproliferative activities. Among these derivatives, 4a–4j, which contain a C₃ spacer between apigenin and the different amines, displayed greater activity than 3a–3j. Compound 4i was found to be the most active derivative, with MIC values of 1.95, 3.91, 3.91, and 3.91 μg/mL against S. aureus, B. subtilis, E. coli, and P. aeruginosa, respectively. Compound 4j showed notable activity against A549, HeLa, HepG2, and MCF-7 cancer cell lines, with the lowest IC₅₀ values among all the synthesized compounds. These findings have encouraged us to continue the development and testing of apigenin derivatives and conduct further studies to investigate SARs and their mechanisms of action.

Supplementary Materials

¹H-NMR and ¹³C-NMR spectra of the compounds 1, 2a, 2b, 3a–3j, and 4a–4j are available in the supplementary materials: https://www.mdpi.com/1420-3049/18/9/11496/s1.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the State Forestry Administration of the People’s Republic of China (Grant No. 200904004), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 21175107, 21375106, and 21202132), the Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China (Grant No. NCET-08-0464), and the Northwest A&F University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

Eckhardt, S. Recent progress in the development of anticancer agents. Curr. Med. Chem.-Anti-Cancer Agents 2002, 2, 419–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lee, C.W.; Hong, D.H.; Han, S.B.; Jung, S.H.; Kim, H.C.; Fine, R.L.; Lee, S.H.; Kim, H.M. A novel stereo-selective sulfonylurea, 1-[1-(4-aminobenzoyl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-indol-6-sulfonyl]-4-phenyl-imidazolidin-2-one, has antitumor efficacy in in vitro and in vivo tumor model. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2002, 64, 473–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Moorthy, N.S.H.N.; Cerqueira, N.S.; Ramos, M.J.; Fernandes, P.A. Title QSAR analysis of 2-benzoxazolyl hydrazone derivatives for anticancer activity and its possible target prediction. Med. Chem. Res. 2012, 21, 133–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Cooper, E.L. Drug discovery, CAM and natural products. Evid. Based Complement Altern. Med. 2004, 1, 215–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Wesołowska, O. Interaction of phenothiazines, stilbenes and flavonoids with multidrug resistance-associated transporters, P-glycoprotein and MRP1. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2011, 58, 433–448. [Google Scholar]
Kandaswami, C.; Lee, L.T.; Lee, P.P.H.; Hwang, J.J.; Ke, F.C.; Huang, Y.T.; Lee, M.T. The antitumor activities of flavonoids. In Vivo 2005, 19, 895–909. [Google Scholar]
Zhang, J.Y.; Yi, T.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Z.Z.; Chen, H.B. Quercetin induces apoptosis via the mitochondrial pathway in KB and KBv200 cells. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 2188–2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Valdameri, G.; Gauthier, C.; Terreux, R.; Kachadourian, R.; Day, B.J.; Winnischofer, S.M.B.; Rocha, M.E.M.; Frachet, V.; Ronot, X.; Pietro, A.D.; et al. Investigation of chalcones as selective inhibitors of the breast cancer resistance protein: Critical role of methoxylation in both inhibition potency and cytotoxicity. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 3193–3200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Egert, S.; Rimbach, G. Which sources of flavonoids: Complex diets or dietary supplements? Adv. Nutr. 2011, 2, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Miean, K.H.; Mohamed, S. Flavonoid (myricetin, quercetin, kaempferol, luteolin, and apigenin) content of edible tropical plants. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 3106–3112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Fotsis, T.; Pepper, M.S.; Aktas, E.; Breit, S.; Rasku, S.; Adlercreutz, H.; Wahala, K.; Montesano, R.; Schweigerer, L. Flavonoids, dietary-derived inhibitors of cell proliferation and in vitro angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 2916–2921. [Google Scholar]
Lin, C.C.; Chuang, Y.J.; Yu, C.C.; Yang, J.S.; Lu, C.C.; Chiang, J.H.; Lin, J.P.; Tang, N.Y.; Huang, A.C.; Chung, J.G. Apigenin induces apoptosis through mitochondrial dysfunction in U-2 OS human osteosarcoma cells and inhibits osteosarcoma xenograft tumor growth in vivo. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 11395–11402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Sundaram, S.; Dwivedi, P.; Purwar, S. In vitro evaluation of antibacterial activities of crude extracts of Withania somnifera (Ashwagandha) to bacterial pathogens. Asian J. Biotechnol. 2011, 3, 194–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Stojanovic, G.; Radulovi, N.; Hashimoto, T.; Palic, R. In vitro antimicrobial activity of extracts of four Achillea species: The composition of Achillea clavennae L. (Asteraceae) extract. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 101, 185–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Zhang, L.N.; Xiao, Z.P.; Ding, H.; Ge, H.M.; Xu, C.; Zhu, H.L.; Tan, R.X. Synthesis and cytotoxic evaluation of novel 7-O-modified genistein derivatives. Chem. Biodivers. 2007, 4, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Li, H.Q.; Shi, L.; Li, Q.S.; Liu, P.G.; Luo, Y.; Zhao, J.; Zhu, H.L. Synthesis of C(7) modified chrysin derivatives designing to inhibit β-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthase III (FabH) as antibiotics. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2009, 17, 6264–6269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Lv, P.C.; Li, H.Q.; Xue, J.Y.; Shi, L.; Zhu, H.L. Synthesis and biological evaluation of novel luteolin derivatives as antibacterial agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 908–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kim, B.G.; Kim, H.; Hur, H.G.; Lim, Y.; Ahn, J.H. Regioselectivity of 7-O-methyltransferase of poplar to flavones. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 126, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kim, B.G.; Jung, B.R.; Lee, Y.; Hur, H.G.; Lim, Y.; Ahn, J.H. Regiospecific flavonoid 7-O-methylation with Streptomyces avermitilis O-methyltransferase expressed in Escherichia coli. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 823–828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Kim, J.; Park, K.S.; Lee, C.; Chong, Y. Synthesis of a complete series of O-methyl analogues of naringenin and apigenin. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2007, 28, 2527–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Prabuseenivasan, S.; Jayakumar, M.; Ignacimuthu, S. In vitro antibacterial activity of some plant essential oils. BMC Complement Altern. Med. 2006, 6, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Liu, R.; Zhao, B.; Wang, D.E.; Yao, T.Y.; Pang, L.; Tu, Q.; Ahmed, S.M.; Liu, J.J.; Wang, J.J. Nitrogen-containing apigenin analogs: Preparation and biological activity. Molecules 2012, 17, 14748–14764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Hassan Hilmy, K.M.; Khalifa, M.M.A.; Allah Hawata, M.A.; AboAlzeen Keshk, R.M.; El-Torgman, A.A. Synthesis of new pyrrolo[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives as antibacterial and antifungal agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 45, 5243–5250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS), Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Disk Susceptibility Tests, 7th ed.; Approved standard, M2–A7; NCCLS: Wayne, PA, USA, 2000.
National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS), Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Document M100–S12; NCCLS: Wayne, PA, USA, 2002.
Liu, J.Y.; Pang, Y.; Chen, J.; Huang, P.; Huang, W.; Zhu, X.Y.; Yan, D.Y. Hyperbranched polydiselenide as a self assembling broad spectrum anticancer agent. Biomaterials 2012, 33, 7765–7774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Xie, J.H.; Liu, X.; Shen, M.Y.; Nie, S.P.; Zhang, H.; Li, C.; Gong, D.M.; Xie, M.Y. Purification, physicochemical characterisation and anticancer activity of a polysaccharide from Cyclocarya paliurus leaves. Food Chem. 2013, 136, 1453–1460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 1, 2a, 2b, 3a–3j, and 4a–4j are available from the authors.

© 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Liu, R.; Zhang, H.; Yuan, M.; Zhou, J.; Tu, Q.; Liu, J.-J.; Wang, J. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Apigenin Derivatives as Antibacterial and Antiproliferative Agents. Molecules 2013, 18, 11496-11511. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules180911496

AMA Style

Liu R, Zhang H, Yuan M, Zhou J, Tu Q, Liu J-J, Wang J. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Apigenin Derivatives as Antibacterial and Antiproliferative Agents. Molecules. 2013; 18(9):11496-11511. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules180911496

Chicago/Turabian Style

Liu, Rui, Hongchi Zhang, Maosen Yuan, Jiao Zhou, Qin Tu, Jian-Jun Liu, and Jinyi Wang. 2013. "Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Apigenin Derivatives as Antibacterial and Antiproliferative Agents" Molecules 18, no. 9: 11496-11511. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules180911496

Article Menu

Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Apigenin Derivatives as Antibacterial and Antiproliferative Agents

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Chemistry

2.2. Antibacterial Activity

2.3. Antiproliferative Activity

3. Experimental

3.1. General

3.2. Synthesis of Compounds 2a, 2b, 3a–3j, and 4a–4j

3.3. Antibacterial Assay

3.4. Antiproliferative Assay

4. Conclusions

Supplementary Materials

Acknowledgments

Conflicts of Interest

References

Share and Cite

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI