Topic Editors

Dr. Shan C. Lin
Glaucoma Center of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
Dr. Sunee Chansangpetch
Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand

New Developments in Glaucoma Diagnostics and Therapeutics

Abstract submission deadline
30 January 2028
Manuscript submission deadline
30 March 2028
Viewed by
6591

Topic Information

Dear Colleagues,

Glaucoma remains a major cause of blindness worldwide and the number of affected individuals continues to grow with each decade. The fields of glaucoma diagnostics and therapeutics have seen significant advancements in the past two decades, including in the areas of OCT imaging, functional testing, laser treatment, innovative minimally invasive surgery, and new medications and delivery methods. More recently, AI has aided in both diagnostics and therapy. The aim of this Topic is to develop updates for practicing doctors and clinician-scientists and present new investigations in the field that advance our knowledge of this important disease closely linked to blindness.

Dr. Shan C. Lin
Dr. Sunee Chansangpetch
Topic Editors

Keywords

  • glaucoma
  • minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries
  • angle closure
  • optical coherence tomography
  • neuroprotection
  • visual fields
  • artificial intelligence

Participating Journals

Journal Name Impact Factor CiteScore Launched Year First Decision (median) APC
Cells
cells
6.0 11.4 2012 14.9 Days CHF 2700 Submit
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
ijms
5.6 10.0 2000 17.5 Days CHF 2900 Submit
Journal of Clinical Medicine
jcm
3.3 5.2 2012 16.6 Days CHF 2600 Submit
Medical Sciences
medsci
5.9 4.6 2013 18.3 Days CHF 1600 Submit
Pharmaceuticals
pharmaceuticals
5.7 9.0 2004 14.3 Days CHF 2900 Submit
Reports
reports
0.5 - 2018 23.2 Days CHF 1400 Submit
Vision
vision
2.7 3.5 2017 21.1 Days CHF 1800 Submit

Preprints.org is a multidisciplinary platform offering a preprint service designed to facilitate the early sharing of your research. It supports and empowers your research journey from the very beginning.

MDPI Topics is collaborating with Preprints.org and has established a direct connection between MDPI journals and the platform. Authors are encouraged to take advantage of this opportunity by posting their preprints at Preprints.org prior to publication:

  1. Share your research immediately: disseminate your ideas prior to publication and establish priority for your work.
  2. Safeguard your intellectual contribution: Protect your ideas with a time-stamped preprint that serves as proof of your research timeline.
  3. Boost visibility and impact: Increase the reach and influence of your research by making it accessible to a global audience.
  4. Gain early feedback: Receive valuable input and insights from peers before submitting to a journal.
  5. Ensure broad indexing: Web of Science (Preprint Citation Index), Google Scholar, Crossref, SHARE, PrePubMed, Scilit and Europe PMC.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Journals
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 371 KB  
Article
Visual Field Loss and Self-Reported Driving Restriction in Glaucoma
by Mladena Radeva, Preslava Encheva, Elitsa Hristova, Daliya Stefanova, Igor Resnick and Zornitsa Zlatarova
Vision 2026, 10(2), 25; https://doi.org/10.3390/vision10020025 - 29 Apr 2026
Viewed by 1011
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the association between glaucomatous visual field loss and self-reported driving limitation, and to explore potential threshold ranges of visual field loss associated with an increased likelihood of driving restriction. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 100 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma [...] Read more.
Background: To evaluate the association between glaucomatous visual field loss and self-reported driving limitation, and to explore potential threshold ranges of visual field loss associated with an increased likelihood of driving restriction. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 100 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma underwent standard automated perimetry. Visual function was assessed using Mean Deviation (MD) and Visual Field Index (VFI) from the better eye. Driving status, driving limitation, and self-reported driving difficulties were assessed using a structured questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine independent associations between visual field parameters and driving limitation, adjusting for age, sex, cataract status, and systemic comorbidities. Because MD and VFI are closely related indices of visual field loss, separate multivariable models were constructed for each parameter. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to explore threshold values associated with driving limitation. Results: Driving limitation increased progressively with worsening functional severity, affecting 17% of participants with preserved function, 48% of those with borderline impairment, and 72% of those with definite impairment (p < 0.001). Reduced VFI was independently associated with driving limitation (OR = 0.972, 95% CI: 0.948–0.996; p = 0.021). In a separate model, more negative MD was also independently associated with driving limitation (OR = 0.924, 95% CI: 0.875–0.976; p = 0.004). Male sex was associated with a lower likelihood of driving limitation. ROC analysis identified threshold values of VFI ≤ 71% (AUC = 0.663) and MD ≤ −13.36 dB (AUC = 0.650), both characterized by high specificity but limited sensitivity. Participants who had ceased driving demonstrated worse visual field indices than active drivers, whereas never-drivers showed no consistent association with visual field loss. Conclusions: Glaucomatous visual field loss was significantly associated with self-reported driving limitation and behavioural self-regulation. Objective perimetric parameters, particularly VFI and MD in the better eye, may help identify patients more likely to report driving difficulties. The reported threshold values should be interpreted as exploratory reference points rather than clinically actionable criteria and require further validation before clinical application. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic New Developments in Glaucoma Diagnostics and Therapeutics)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1317 KB  
Article
An Exploratory Study of Six-Month Niacinamide Supplementation on Macular Structure and Electrophysiology in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma
by Constantin Alin Nicola, Maria Cristina Marinescu, Cristina Alexandrescu, Anne Marie Firan, Walid Alyamani, Mihaela Simona Naidin, Radu Constantin Ciuluvica, Radu Antoniu Patrascu, Anca Maria Capraru and Adina Turcu-Stiolica
Vision 2026, 10(1), 7; https://doi.org/10.3390/vision10010007 - 28 Jan 2026
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2188
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is one of the leading ocular diseases leading to irreversible blindness and is often asymptomatic until advanced cases. While intraocular pressure reduction remains the cornerstone of treatment, neuroprotective strategies targeting retinal ganglion cell metabolism are actively [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) is one of the leading ocular diseases leading to irreversible blindness and is often asymptomatic until advanced cases. While intraocular pressure reduction remains the cornerstone of treatment, neuroprotective strategies targeting retinal ganglion cell metabolism are actively investigated. Niacinamide (nicotinamide, vitamin B3), a precursor of NAD+, has shown neuroprotective potential in preclinical models. This exploratory study evaluated the short-term functional, structural, and electrophysiological effects of oral niacinamide supplementation in POAG. Materials and Methods: In this interventional study, patients with POAG received oral niacinamide 500 mg daily for six months. Visual field (VF) global and localized sensitivity (Mean Deviation [MD], Pattern Standard Deviation [PSD]), Optic Coherence Tomography (OCT)-derived peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and macular ganglion cell complex (GCC), and Visual evoked potentials (VEP) latency parameters (P2 1.4 Hz, P100 1°, and P100 15′) were assessed at baseline and at six months. Because both eyes from some participants were included, primary longitudinal inference was based on clustered analyses using generalized estimating equations and linear mixed-effects models to account for inter-eye correlation. Eye-level paired analyses were used for exploratory comparison. Change–change relationships across modalities were explored using Spearman correlation. Results: After accounting for inter-eye correlation, no statistically significant change in MD was detected (mean ΔMD +0.43 dB; GEE p = 0.099; LME p = 0.101), and PSD remained stable. RNFL thickness showed a small decrease (−1.26 µm; GEE p = 0.046), while GCC did not change significantly. VEP P100 latencies remained stable, whereas P2 latency showed a small increase (+3.9 ms; GEE p = 0.039). Correlation analysis revealed a moderate association between changes in GCC and MD (ρ = 0.44), suggesting concordance between macular structural stability and global visual field performance. Conclusions: When inter-eye correlation is appropriately accounted for, six months of niacinamide supplementation in POAG is associated with overall functional, structural, and electrophysiological stability, without evidence of clinically meaningful improvement or progression. These findings support short-term safety and highlight the importance of clustered analytical approaches and macular-centered biomarkers in future glaucoma neuroprotection trials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic New Developments in Glaucoma Diagnostics and Therapeutics)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop