Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (157)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = venous thrombotic risk

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
21 pages, 2014 KB  
Systematic Review
Interventional Procedures in Deep Venous Thrombosis Treatment: A Review of Techniques, Outcomes, and Patient Selection
by Arkadiusz Kacała, Mateusz Dorochowicz, Jędrzej Fischer, Adrian Korbecki, Aleksander Truszyński, Anna Madura, Krzysztof Dyś, Andrzej Szuba and Maciej Guziński
Medicina 2025, 61(8), 1476; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081476 - 18 Aug 2025
Viewed by 649
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is associated with pulmonary embolism and long-term complications such as post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Anticoagulation prevents thrombus extension but does not actively remove clot. Interventional techniques, including catheter-directed thrombolysis, mechanical and pharmacomechanical thrombectomy, and venous stenting, have [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is associated with pulmonary embolism and long-term complications such as post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Anticoagulation prevents thrombus extension but does not actively remove clot. Interventional techniques, including catheter-directed thrombolysis, mechanical and pharmacomechanical thrombectomy, and venous stenting, have been introduced to restore venous patency and reduce complications. This systematic review summarizes current evidence on outcomes, safety, and patient selection for these procedures. Materials and Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was conducted for studies published between January 2000 and February 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and observational studies with ≥20 patients. Extracted outcomes were technical success, thrombus clearance, venous patency, PTS, quality of life, and complications. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool, Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and AMSTAR-2. Results: Of 456 records screened, 35 studies were included. Randomized trials (CaVenT, ATTRACT, CAVA) showed that catheter-directed and pharmacomechanical approaches improved venous patency and reduced moderate-to-severe PTS in selected patients with iliofemoral DVT, though overall benefit was variable. Mechanical thrombectomy devices (e.g., AngioJet, ClotTriever, FlowTriever) achieved high thrombus clearance and shorter procedural times, with device-specific complication profiles. Observational data demonstrated venous stenting patency rates of 74–89% at 12 months. Study heterogeneity limited direct comparisons. Conclusions: Interventional procedures can reduce PTS and improve outcomes in carefully selected patients, particularly those with acute iliofemoral DVT. Modern mechanical and pharmacomechanical techniques enhance efficiency and safety, while venous stenting addresses underlying obstructions. Further high-quality trials with long-term follow-up are needed to define optimal patient selection and comparative effectiveness. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Progress in Venous Thromboembolism Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 249 KB  
Review
Update on Thromboembolic Events After Vaccination Against COVID-19
by Theocharis Anastasiou, Elias Sanidas, Thekla Lytra, Georgios Mimikos, Helen Gogas and Marina Mantzourani
Vaccines 2025, 13(8), 833; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13080833 - 5 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1282
Abstract
The association between COVID-19 vaccination and thromboembolic events has garnered significant research attention, particularly with the advent of vaccines based on adenoviral vectors, including AstraZeneca’s and Johnson & Johnson’s vaccines. This review underscores the uncommon occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), arterial thromboembolism (ATE), [...] Read more.
The association between COVID-19 vaccination and thromboembolic events has garnered significant research attention, particularly with the advent of vaccines based on adenoviral vectors, including AstraZeneca’s and Johnson & Johnson’s vaccines. This review underscores the uncommon occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), arterial thromboembolism (ATE), and vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) following COVID-19 vaccination. Although these complications are extremely rare compared to the heightened risk of thrombosis from COVID-19 infection, elements like age, biological sex, type of vaccine and underlying health conditions may contribute to their development. In addition, rare renal complications such as acute kidney injury and thrombotic microangiopathy have been documented, broadening the spectrum of potential vaccine-associated thrombotic manifestations. Current guidelines emphasize early detection, individualized risk assessment, and use of anticoagulation therapy to mitigate risks. Despite these events, the overwhelming majority of evidence supports the continued use of COVID-19 vaccines, given their proven efficacy in reducing severe illness and mortality. In addition, recent comparative data confirm that mRNA-based vaccines are associated with a significantly lower risk of serious thrombotic events compared to adenoviral vector platforms. Ongoing research is essential to further refine preventive and therapeutic strategies, particularly for at-risk populations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)
19 pages, 348 KB  
Review
Venous Thromboembolic Events in Cancer Immunotherapy: A Narrative Review
by Cosmo Fowler and Stephen M. Pastores
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 4926; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144926 - 11 Jul 2025
Viewed by 691
Abstract
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a significant complication of cancer immunotherapy, with emerging evidence suggesting distinct pathophysiological mechanisms compared to traditional chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. This narrative review examines the epidemiology and pathogenesis of VTE in patients receiving immunotherapies for cancer including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), [...] Read more.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a significant complication of cancer immunotherapy, with emerging evidence suggesting distinct pathophysiological mechanisms compared to traditional chemotherapy-associated thrombosis. This narrative review examines the epidemiology and pathogenesis of VTE in patients receiving immunotherapies for cancer including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, bispecific T-cell engagers (BiTEs), among others. Real-world studies demonstrate a wide range of VTE incidence rates in ICI recipients, with potential mechanisms including exacerbated underlying interleukin-8-mediated inflammatory pathways and consequent neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation. CAR T-cell therapy is associated with unique hemostatic challenges, including concurrent thrombotic and bleeding risks related to cytokine release syndrome. Current risk assessment tools show limited predictive utility in patients receiving immunotherapies for cancer, highlighting the need for novel stratification models. Future research priorities include developing immunotherapy-specific risk prediction tools, elucidating mechanistic pathways linking immune activation to thrombosis, and establishing evidence-based and tailored thromboprophylaxis strategies. As cancer immunotherapy continues to evolve, understanding and mitigating thrombotic complications remains crucial for optimizing patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thrombosis: Latest Advances and Prospects)
15 pages, 307 KB  
Article
Matrix Metalloproteinases Family Gene Polymorphisms Are Associated with Thrombosis Risk in Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
by Roberta Vadeikienė, Aistė Savukaitytė, Danguolė Laukaitienė, Rūta Dambrauskienė, Rolandas Gerbutavičius, Elona Juozaitytė and Rasa Ugenskienė
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(14), 6646; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26146646 - 11 Jul 2025
Viewed by 283
Abstract
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal hematopoietic disorders characterized by excessive proliferation of one or more myeloid lineages, frequently accompanied by an elevated risk of thrombotic events. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), a family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases, are implicated in numerous inflammatory and vascular pathophysiological processes. [...] Read more.
Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal hematopoietic disorders characterized by excessive proliferation of one or more myeloid lineages, frequently accompanied by an elevated risk of thrombotic events. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), a family of zinc-dependent endopeptidases, are implicated in numerous inflammatory and vascular pathophysiological processes. In this study, we analyzed the association between selected MMP polymorphisms, rs1799750, rs243865, rs3025058, rs3918242, and rs17576, and thrombotic risk as well as clinical characteristics in patients with MPNs. Genotyping was performed using the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) method. Among the polymorphisms analyzed, a statistically significant association was identified between the MMP-9 rs3918242 CT genotype and an increased risk of arterial thrombosis (OR = 4.206, CI 1.337–13.234, p = 0.014). Moreover, rs3918242 CT was associated with thrombotic events (both arterial and venous thrombosis combined), suggesting a potential contributory role in the prothrombotic phenotype observed in MPNs (OR = 3.200, CI 1.110–9.258, p = 0.031). These findings indicate that genetic variation in MMP-9, particularly rs3918242, may serve as a predictive marker for vascular complications in MPN patients. Further studies with larger cohorts are warranted to confirm these associations and to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the contribution of MMP polymorphisms to thrombosis in MPNs. Full article
9 pages, 550 KB  
Case Report
Psychotic Disorder Secondary to Cerebral Venous Thrombosis Caused by Primary Thrombophilia in a Pediatric Patient with Protein S Deficiency and an MTHFR p.Ala222Val Variant: A Case Report
by Darío Martínez-Pascual, Alejandra Dennise Solis-Mendoza, Jacqueline Calderon-García, Bettina Sommer, Eduardo Calixto, María E. Martinez-Enriquez, Arnoldo Aquino-Gálvez, Hector Solis-Chagoyan, Luis M. Montaño, Bianca S. Romero-Martinez, Ruth Jaimez and Edgar Flores-Soto
Hematol. Rep. 2025, 17(4), 34; https://doi.org/10.3390/hematolrep17040034 - 3 Jul 2025
Viewed by 568
Abstract
Background and Clinical Significance: Herein, we describe the clinical case of a 17-year-old patient with psychotic disorder secondary to cerebral venous thrombosis due to primary thrombophilia, which was related to protein S deficiency and a heterozygous MTHFR gene mutation with the p.Ala222Val variant. [...] Read more.
Background and Clinical Significance: Herein, we describe the clinical case of a 17-year-old patient with psychotic disorder secondary to cerebral venous thrombosis due to primary thrombophilia, which was related to protein S deficiency and a heterozygous MTHFR gene mutation with the p.Ala222Val variant. Case presentation: A 17-year-old female, with no history of previous illnesses, was admitted to the emergency service department due to a psychotic break. Psychiatric evaluation detected disorganized thought, euphoria, ideas that were fleeting and loosely associated, psychomotor excitement, and deviant judgment. On the fifth day, an inflammatory process in the parotid gland was detected, pointing out a probable viral meningoencephalitis, prompting antiviral and antimicrobial treatment. One week after antiviral and steroidal anti-inflammatory treatments, the symptoms’ improvement was minimal, which led to further neurological workup. MRI venography revealed a filling defect in the transverse sinus, consistent with cerebral venous thrombosis. Consequently, anticoagulation treatment with enoxaparin was initiated. The patient’s behavior improved, revealing that the encephalopathic symptoms were secondary to thrombosis of the venous sinus. Hematological studies indicated the cause of the venous sinus thrombosis was a primary thrombophilia caused by a heterozygous MTHFR mutation variant p.Ala222Val and a 35% decrease in plasmatic protein S. Conclusions: This case highlights the possible relationship between psychiatric and thrombotic disorders, suggesting that both the MTHFR mutation and protein S deficiency could lead to psychotic disorders. Early detection of thrombotic risk factors in early-onset psychiatric disorders is essential for the comprehensive management of patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 423 KB  
Article
An Analysis of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events, Other Adverse Events, and Efficacy in Patients with Rheumatic Disease Receiving Targeted Therapy: Experience from a Third-Level Hospital
by Marta Rojas-Giménez, Paloma Muñoz-Reinoso, María Dolores Arcila-Durán, Virginia Moreira-Navarrete, Manuel Maqueda López, María Dolores Fernández-Alba, Rafael Ariza-Ariza, Maria Daniela Decan-Bardasz, Blanca Hernández Cruz, Francisco Javier Toyos, Dolores Virginia Mendoza Mendoza and José Javier Pérez Venegas
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4693; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134693 - 2 Jul 2025
Viewed by 415
Abstract
Objectives: We wished to evaluate the safety profile of the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors used in the Spanish population; to study the onset of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and thrombotic events (arterial and venous); and to analyze the factors associated with the [...] Read more.
Objectives: We wished to evaluate the safety profile of the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors used in the Spanish population; to study the onset of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and thrombotic events (arterial and venous); and to analyze the factors associated with the onset of these events. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study of a cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA), and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) included in the biological therapy registry of the Rheumatology Department of Virgen Macarena University Hospital (HUVM), Seville, Spain, who started targeted treatment between 2019 and late 2024. We collected data on disease activity, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, the Charlson comorbidity index, previous synthetic or biologic drug therapy, the use of corticosteroids (and their dose), severity data (structural damage, extra-articular manifestations), and adverse events at the end of follow-up (e.g., MACEs, infections, neoplasms, and herpes zoster). We performed a descriptive bivariate analysis and a multivariate logistic regression analysis (dependent variable: MACEs) to identify factors that were independently associated with MACEs. Results: The study population comprised 137 patients (110 with RA, 18 with PsA, and 9 with SpA) who were followed up for a mean of 3.9 (2.6) years. Most patients had received JAK inhibitors as their second-line or subsequent treatment. At the end of the follow-up, 82 patients (66.7%) continued their treatment. Nine patients (6.6%) experienced a MACE, and five experienced a heart attack. All of these patients had RA. We found no differences between JAK inhibitors in terms of the incidence of the adverse events studied. Patients who experienced MACEs were more often male and smokers (current or former) and more often had hypertension and diabetes. No significant differences were found in the association with disease activity or previous or concomitant treatment. The factors that were independently associated with MACEs were a previous cardiovascular event (OR, 10.74; 95%CI, 1.05–113.7; p = 0.036), male sex (OR, 9.7; 95%CI, 1.6–76.5; p = 0.016), diabetes mellitus (OR, 10.3; 95%CI, 1.75–83; p = 0.013), and the duration of treatment with JAK inhibitors (OR, 1.47; 95%CI, 1.13–2.01; p = 0.005). Conclusions: We found no differences in the onset of adverse events, specifically MACEs, between the different JAK inhibitors analyzed. These events are more common in patients who already have cardiovascular risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus, or who have already experienced a cardiovascular event. JAK inhibitors broadly suppress cytokines in patients whose disease is refractory to other treatments. However, we must continue to evaluate their long-term safety in real-world studies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 586 KB  
Article
The Safety of Apixaban Compared to Warfarin in Hospitalized Patients with Acute Kidney Injury
by Majed S. Al Yami, Lama Alfehaid, Abdulmajeed M. Alshehri, Norah Alqahtani, Ghadah Almuaither, Shaden H. Alonazi, Mohammed Y. Alzahrani, Amal M. Badawoud and Omar A. Almohammed
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4685; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134685 - 2 Jul 2025
Viewed by 738
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Apixaban is favored over warfarin for atrial fibrillation (Afib) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to its effectiveness, safety, and lack of routine monitoring. However, managing anticoagulation in hospitalized patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) is challenging due to altered pharmacokinetics and [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Apixaban is favored over warfarin for atrial fibrillation (Afib) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to its effectiveness, safety, and lack of routine monitoring. However, managing anticoagulation in hospitalized patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) is challenging due to altered pharmacokinetics and limited safety data. This study assesses the safety and efficacy of apixaban versus warfarin in these patients. Methods: This retrospective chart review at King Abdulaziz Medical City in Riyadh included adult patients (≥18 years) with AKI, as defined by the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) guideline. Primary outcomes were rates of major and minor bleeding within 30 days, as defined by the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), and thrombotic events. Secondary outcomes included 30-day rates of all-cause mortality and hospital readmissions. Results: Among 513 patients, 294 received apixaban and 219 received warfarin. Major bleeding within 30 days was significantly lower in the apixaban group (3.4%) compared to warfarin (7.3%) (p = 0.0461). Minor bleeding rates were similar (6.5% apixaban vs. 5.5% warfarin; p = 0.616). Thrombotic events occurred in 6.8% of patients, with no significant difference between apixaban (6.5%) and warfarin (7.3%) (p = 0.739). Mortality rates were 8.0%, with no significant difference (8.8% apixaban vs. 6.8% warfarin; p = 0.3846). Readmission rates were comparable (38.8% for apixaban vs. 39.7% for warfarin; p = 0.9499). Conclusions: In hospitalized AKI patients, apixaban was associated with a lower major bleeding risk compared to warfarin, with similar rates of thrombotic events, mortality, and readmissions, suggesting apixaban may be a safer option, warranting further research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thromboembolic Disease and Antithrombotic Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 792 KB  
Article
Cryofibrinogenemia in PRECOVID-19 and COVID-19 Periods: Single University Study in Northern Spain
by María del Amparo Sánchez López, Carmen Lasa-Teja, Mónica Renuncio-García, Cristina Abraira-Meriel, Saray Simón-Coloret, Inmaculada Bertomeu-Genis, Adrián Martín-Gutiérrez, Carmen Secada-Gómez, Carmen González-Vela, Juan Irure-Ventura, Marcos López-Hoyos, Marcos A. González-López and Ricardo Blanco
Sci 2025, 7(2), 81; https://doi.org/10.3390/sci7020081 - 6 Jun 2025
Viewed by 396
Abstract
Cryofibrinogenemia (CF) may be secondary to COVID-19. To establish this relationship, in PRECOVID-19 and COVID-19 periods we assess: (a) frequency and clinical features in patients with CF; (b) study of CF syndrome. We study all cryofibrinogen tests performed in a single university hospital [...] Read more.
Cryofibrinogenemia (CF) may be secondary to COVID-19. To establish this relationship, in PRECOVID-19 and COVID-19 periods we assess: (a) frequency and clinical features in patients with CF; (b) study of CF syndrome. We study all cryofibrinogen tests performed in a single university hospital in Northern Spain, comparing two periods: PRECOVID-19 (July 2017–February 2020) and COVID-19 (March 2020–October 2022). CF syndrome was established with two positive cryofibrinogen tests plus compatible cutaneous manifestations and/or thrombotic events (TE). CF was found in 129/279 patients. In the COVID-19 period, they had more positive tests (50.2% vs. 28%; p = 0.0047), younger age (33 vs. 55 years, p = 0.054) and fewer cardiovascular (CV) risk factors (39.1% vs. 78.6%, p = 0.005). Cutaneous manifestations were the most frequent in both periods (81.4%), particularly purpuric macules (29.5%). Skin ulcers showed statistically significant differences, being more frequent in the PRECOVID-19 era (35.7% vs. 7.8%, p = 0.008). Thrombotic CV events were also observed (13.2%), particularly venous thromboembolisms (12.2%). Severe complications were more frequent in the PRECOVID-19 era, although this difference did not reach statistical significance (35.7% vs. 19.1%; p = 0.169). CF was secondary in 68/129 cases, mainly to SARS-CoV-2 (n = 45). CF syndrome was found in 27.9% of patients. After one year, most patients were clinically stable or in remission. Mild dermatological lesions were the most frequent manifestations, and most patients recovered. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biology Research and Life Sciences)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 781 KB  
Review
Exploring the Emerging Association Between Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Thrombosis
by Hassan Fawaz, Hasan Numan, Mohamad Hadi El Charif, Nicole Charbel, Sacha El Khoury, Joe Rizkallah, Amal El Masri, Arafat Tfayli and Firas Kreidieh
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(10), 3451; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103451 - 15 May 2025
Viewed by 1267
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, but their association with thrombosis presents significant clinical challenges. Patients with cancer already exhibit elevated risks for venous thromboembolism and arterial thrombosis, with treatment modalities like chemotherapy further exacerbating this risk. Emerging evidence suggests that [...] Read more.
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, but their association with thrombosis presents significant clinical challenges. Patients with cancer already exhibit elevated risks for venous thromboembolism and arterial thrombosis, with treatment modalities like chemotherapy further exacerbating this risk. Emerging evidence suggests that ICIs contribute to thrombotic events through multifactorial mechanisms, including immune dysregulation, T cell activation, endothelial dysfunction, elevated tissue factor expression, and impaired fibrinolysis. Additional risk factors such as obesity, smoking, prior thrombotic events, and combination ICI therapy further increase thrombosis susceptibility. The literature reports varying incidence rates of ICI-associated thrombosis, with some studies indicating comparable risks to chemotherapy, while others highlight higher rates, particularly during the initial treatment phase. Management aligns with standard protocols for cancer-associated thrombosis, using low-molecular-weight heparin or direct oral anticoagulants, though optimal treatment duration and the role of prophylactic anticoagulation require further investigation. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms, incidence rates, and clinical management strategies of ICI-associated thrombosis, emphasizing the importance of proactive risk assessment to optimize patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vascular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 1638 KB  
Review
From Circulating Biomarkers to Polymorphic Variants: A Narrative Review of Challenges in Thrombophilia Evaluation
by Giuseppe Miceli, Anna Maria Ciaccio and Antonino Tuttolomondo
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(10), 3448; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103448 - 15 May 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 920
Abstract
Thrombophilia is characterized by a hypercoagulable state that predisposes individuals to venous and arterial thrombotic events, posing significant challenges for clinical evaluation and management. This narrative review critically examines the current landscape of thrombophilia testing, focusing on the utility and limitations of both [...] Read more.
Thrombophilia is characterized by a hypercoagulable state that predisposes individuals to venous and arterial thrombotic events, posing significant challenges for clinical evaluation and management. This narrative review critically examines the current landscape of thrombophilia testing, focusing on the utility and limitations of both circulating and genetic biomarkers. Circulating biomarkers—such as D-dimer, antithrombin, protein C, and protein S—offer dynamic insights into the coagulation process yet often suffer from low specificity in varied clinical settings. In contrast, genetic biomarkers, notably Factor V Leiden and the prothrombin G20210A mutation, provide stable risk stratification but are limited by their low prevalence in the general population. Emerging markers, including selectins, Factor VIII, Factor XI, neutrophil extracellular traps, and extracellular vesicles, are also discussed for their potential to refine thrombotic risk assessment. By integrating evidence-based guidelines from international health organizations, this review underscores the need for a personalized approach to thrombophilia evaluation that balances comprehensive risk assessment with the avoidance of over-testing. Such an approach is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes and informing the duration and intensity of anticoagulant therapy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1974 KB  
Systematic Review
Outcomes of Different Regimens of Rivaroxaban and Aspirin in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Network Meta-Analysis
by Mohammed Maan Al-Salihi and Adnan I. Qureshi
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(10), 3437; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103437 - 14 May 2025
Viewed by 812
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Rivaroxaban is widely used to prevent thrombotic events in cardiovascular diseases (CVD). While various doses and combinations with aspirin have been evaluated across CVD subtypes, the optimal regimen remains unclear. This network meta-analysis aims to identify the most effective and safe rivaroxaban [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Rivaroxaban is widely used to prevent thrombotic events in cardiovascular diseases (CVD). While various doses and combinations with aspirin have been evaluated across CVD subtypes, the optimal regimen remains unclear. This network meta-analysis aims to identify the most effective and safe rivaroxaban regimens, with or without aspirin, for patients with CVD. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science identified randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) assessing rivaroxaban, with or without aspirin, in CVD. Key outcomes included thromboembolic, hemorrhagic, and mortality events. A frequentist network meta-analysis (MetaInsight tool) was performed, using aspirin monotherapy as the reference. Subgroup analyses for coronary artery disease (CAD) were conducted. Results: Seven RCTs were included. Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily (“bis in die” (BID)) with aspirin showed the most significant venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention (RR = 0.61, 95% CI [0.43–0.86]) but had the highest major bleeding risk (RR = 1.58, 95% CI [1.26–2]). Rivaroxaban 5 mg BID with aspirin showed the lowest myocardial infarction risk (RR = 0.78). Higher doses (20 mg BID) with aspirin were associated with an increased fatal bleeding risk (RR = 7.14, 95% CI [2.83–17.98]). Rivaroxaban 5 mg BID monotherapy had the highest hemorrhagic stroke risk (RR = 2.7, 95% CI [1.31–5.58]). In CAD, rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID plus aspirin offered the lowest all-cause mortality (RR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.63–0.93]). Conclusions: Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg BID plus aspirin reduces VTE and lowers mortality in CAD but carries higher bleeding risks. Optimal regimen selection requires a careful risk–benefit balance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 515 KB  
Article
Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis vs. Anticoagulation in Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Comparative Study
by Mehmet Cahit Saricaoglu, Ali Ihsan Hasde, Ali Fuat Karacuha, Ahmet Kayan, Onur Buyukcakır, Fatma Akca, Evren Ozcinar, Cagdas Baran, Mustafa Bahadir Inan, Mustafa Sirlak, Levent Yazicioglu, Ahmet Ruchan Akar and Sadik Eryilmaz
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(10), 3298; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103298 - 9 May 2025
Viewed by 1133
Abstract
Background: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is an important component of venous thromboembolism and can lead to pulmonary embolism with high morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulant therapy alone (AC) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) are commonly used strategies for the management of DVT. Although CDT has [...] Read more.
Background: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is an important component of venous thromboembolism and can lead to pulmonary embolism with high morbidity and mortality. Anticoagulant therapy alone (AC) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) are commonly used strategies for the management of DVT. Although CDT has been reported to be effective in reducing the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), it remains unclear in which patient groups it should be preferred due to the risk of bleeding. Methods: This retrospective study included 175 patients diagnosed with DVT between 2015 and 2024 (98 AC, 77 CDT). Patients with a diagnosis of proximal DVT, aged ≥18 years, and with at least 30 days of follow-up data were included. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality and secondary endpoints were the length of hospitalization, pulmonary embolism, and bleeding complications. Results: The CDT group was superior to AC in thrombus clearance rates, especially in iliac vein thrombosis (97.7% vs. 78%, p = 0.003). Clinical symptoms improved faster in the CDT group, but total hospitalization was longer. There were no significant differences in bleeding complications and mortality rates between the two groups. Conclusions: The optimal approach to DVT treatment should be based on the patient’s individual risk factors. Although CDT provides a higher thrombus clearance rate, especially in iliac vein thrombosis, it may not be suitable for all patients. Future large-scale studies will contribute to a better understanding of the long-term outcomes of interventional therapies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiovascular Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3214 KB  
Case Report
Severe Postoperative Complications Following Bilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction in a High-Risk Patient: A Case Report
by Francesco Marena, Marco Grosso, Alessia De Col, Franco Bassetto and Tito Brambullo
Complications 2025, 2(2), 12; https://doi.org/10.3390/complications2020012 - 2 May 2025
Viewed by 2082
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction is considered the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction due to its favorable aesthetic results and low donor site morbidity. Nevertheless, it remains associated with potentially life-threatening complications such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap reconstruction is considered the gold standard for autologous breast reconstruction due to its favorable aesthetic results and low donor site morbidity. Nevertheless, it remains associated with potentially life-threatening complications such as deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE). This report aims to describe a complex clinical case in which severe thromboembolic and ischemic complications occurred despite adherence to standard prophylactic protocols. Methods: We present the case of a 65-year-old female with multiple thromboembolic risk factors—including obesity, a history of heavy smoking, hormone therapy, and prior COVID-19 infection—who underwent immediate bilateral breast reconstruction with DIEP flaps following mastectomy. Results: Within the first 24 h postoperatively, the patient developed a massive pulmonary embolism requiring intensive care management. Despite appropriate anticoagulation and supportive measures, she subsequently experienced full-thickness necrosis of the central portion of the abdominal flap. Thrombophilia screening and diagnostic imaging did not reveal peripheral venous thrombosis, raising the hypothesis of a hypercoagulable state potentially related to prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. Conclusions: This case underscores the importance of individualized risk stratification and suggests that current prophylaxis protocols may be insufficient for patients with overlapping thrombotic risk factors. The findings advocate for further investigation into the long-term vascular effects of COVID-19 and support reconsidering extended or intensified prophylaxis in high-risk populations undergoing complex microsurgical procedures. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 3837 KB  
Review
Challenges and Opportunities of Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC) Therapy in Complex Clinical Scenarios: A Comprehensive Review and Practical Guide
by Giuseppe Miceli, Anna Maria Ciaccio and Antonino Tuttolomondo
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(9), 2914; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14092914 - 23 Apr 2025
Viewed by 5447
Abstract
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as a preferred alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders, offering improved safety, predictable pharmacokinetics, and ease of administration. Despite these advantages, their use in complex clinical scenarios presents significant [...] Read more.
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as a preferred alternative to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the prevention and treatment of thromboembolic disorders, offering improved safety, predictable pharmacokinetics, and ease of administration. Despite these advantages, their use in complex clinical scenarios presents significant challenges that necessitate individualized therapeutic strategies. This comprehensive review explores the efficacy, safety, and limitations of DOAC therapy in special populations, including patients with renal or hepatic impairment, obesity, cancer-associated thrombosis, and antiphospholipid syndrome. Additionally, we examine their role in uncommon thrombotic conditions such as superficial venous thrombosis, embolic stroke of undetermined source, upper extremity vein thrombosis, inferior vena cava thrombosis, pelvic vein thrombosis, and cerebral vein thrombosis. The pharmacokinetic variability of DOACs in renal and hepatic dysfunction requires caution to balance the bleeding and thrombotic risks. In obesity, altered drug distribution and metabolism raise concerns regarding appropriate dosing and therapeutic efficacy. Cancer-associated thrombosis presents a complex interplay of prothrombotic mechanisms, necessitating careful selection of anticoagulant therapy. Furthermore, the use of DOACs in antiphospholipid syndrome remains controversial due to concerns about recurrent thrombotic events. Finally, in some unusual scenarios like inferior vena cava, pelvic vein, and cerebral vein thrombosis, the use of DOACs has scarce evidence. This review aims to guide clinicians in optimizing anticoagulation management in challenging patient populations by synthesizing current evidence and providing practical recommendations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Thromboembolic Disease and Antithrombotic Therapy)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 3118 KB  
Review
Effects of B Vitamins on Homocysteine Lowering and Thrombotic Risk Reduction—A Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Published Since January 1996
by Mengyan Li, Ruodi Ren, Kunkun Wang, Shan Wang, Allison Chow, Andrew K. Yang, Yun Lu and Christopher Leo
Nutrients 2025, 17(7), 1122; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17071122 - 24 Mar 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3750
Abstract
Homocysteine is an amino acid derived from methionine which is metabolized via vitamin B6 (pyridoxine)- and vitamin B12 (cobalamin)-dependent pathways. Supplementation of B vitamins has been shown to effectively reduce plasma homocysteine levels. Previous research has also demonstrated an association between [...] Read more.
Homocysteine is an amino acid derived from methionine which is metabolized via vitamin B6 (pyridoxine)- and vitamin B12 (cobalamin)-dependent pathways. Supplementation of B vitamins has been shown to effectively reduce plasma homocysteine levels. Previous research has also demonstrated an association between lower plasma homocysteine levels and decreased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke, and venous thromboembolism. However, whether supplementation of B vitamins is associated with risk reduction in thromboembolic events and confers clinical benefits remains inconclusive. This review examines clinical trials published over the past 29 years to assess the effects of B vitamin supplementation on thrombotic risk reduction and homocysteine metabolism. The findings from these studies are inconsistent, and the impact of B vitamins on thrombosis prevention remains uncertain. Given the conflicting evidence, further clinical and translational research is necessary to clarify the role of B vitamin supplementation in thrombosis risk reduction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vitamins and Human Health: 2nd Edition)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop