Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (946)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = vaccine side effects

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 284 KiB  
Article
Is Inhaled Colostrum as Effective as Inhaled Lavender Essential Oil for Pain Control in Neonatal Frenotomies? A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial
by Silvia Maya-Enero, Júlia Candel-Pau, Beatriz Valle-Del Barrio, Montserrat Fàbregas-Mitjans, Sandra Prieto-Paja and María Ángeles López-Vílchez
Children 2025, 12(8), 982; https://doi.org/10.3390/children12080982 - 26 Jul 2025
Viewed by 127
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Neonatal pain must be treated due to its potential short- and long-term adverse effects. A frenotomy is a painful procedure where common strategies to relieve pain (oral sucrose solutions and sucking) cannot be used because the technique is performed on the tongue. [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Neonatal pain must be treated due to its potential short- and long-term adverse effects. A frenotomy is a painful procedure where common strategies to relieve pain (oral sucrose solutions and sucking) cannot be used because the technique is performed on the tongue. Lavender essential oil (LEO) is useful in treating pain during blood sampling, heel punctures, vaccination, and frenotomies. We aimed to determine whether smelling colostrum had similar effects as inhaled LEO during frenotomies. Methods: A prospective, randomized clinical trial was carried out with neonates who underwent a frenotomy for ankyloglossia between September 2023 and June 2024. We assessed pain using the NIPS score, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and crying time. After obtaining parental informed consent, we randomized patients into experimental and control groups. In both groups, we performed swaddling, administered 1 mL of oral sucrose, and let the newborn suck for 2 min. In the experimental group, we placed a gauze pad with two drops of colostrum, whereas in the control group, we used one drop of LEO 2 cm under the neonate’s nose prior to and during the frenotomy. Results: We enrolled 142 patients (71 experimental cases and 71 controls). The experimental group showed lower crying times (28.0 vs. 40.2 s, p = 0.03). Both groups showed similar NIPS scores (1.4 vs. 1.5, p = 0.28). We observed no side effects in either of the groups. Conclusions: Inhaled colostrum and LEO help relieve pain in neonates who undergo a frenotomy for ankyloglossia and have no side effects. Aromatherapy with colostrum may decrease crying time during the frenotomy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Neonatology)
11 pages, 242 KiB  
Review
Varicella-Zoster Virus Infection and Varicella-Zoster Virus Vaccine-Related Ocular Complications
by Jing Yu, Huihui Li, Yuying Ji and Hailan Liao
Vaccines 2025, 13(8), 782; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13080782 - 23 Jul 2025
Viewed by 270
Abstract
The varicella-zoster virus is a human herpesvirus that causes varicella as the primary infection and HZ as the reactivation of a latent infection. Ten to twenty percent of cases of herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) involve the ophthalmic branch of the fifth cranial nerve. [...] Read more.
The varicella-zoster virus is a human herpesvirus that causes varicella as the primary infection and HZ as the reactivation of a latent infection. Ten to twenty percent of cases of herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO) involve the ophthalmic branch of the fifth cranial nerve. Any area of the eye may be affected by the condition. HZ has a lifetime risk of more than 30%. Complications from herpes zoster can significantly lower quality of life. The goal of HZ vaccinations is to stop HZ activation and PHN formation. Despite the uncommon possibility of side effects such as eye problems, the majority of vaccines on the market now are safe. The purpose of this review is to discuss VZV infection and analyze and summarize the ocular complications following VZV vaccination. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Varicella and Zoster Vaccination)
15 pages, 452 KiB  
Systematic Review
The Efficacy of Neoantigen-Loaded Dendritic Cell Vaccine Immunotherapy in Non-Metastatic Gastric Cancer
by Menelaos Papakonstantinou, Paraskevi Chatzikomnitsa, Areti Danai Gkaitatzi, Athanasia Myriskou, Alexandros Giakoustidis, Dimitrios Giakoustidis and Vasileios N. Papadopoulos
Med. Sci. 2025, 13(3), 90; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030090 - 11 Jul 2025
Viewed by 830
Abstract
Introduction: Gastric cancer (GC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Even though surgery and chemotherapy are the mainstay of treatment, immunotherapy, and more specifically anti-tumor vaccination, has gained popularity over the past years due to the lower related toxicity and [...] Read more.
Introduction: Gastric cancer (GC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Even though surgery and chemotherapy are the mainstay of treatment, immunotherapy, and more specifically anti-tumor vaccination, has gained popularity over the past years due to the lower related toxicity and fewer long-term side effects. Dendritic cell (DC) vaccines have been shown to induce tumor specific cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) responses both in vitro and in vivo; however, due to the nature of the disease, resistance to immunotherapy is often developed. Various modifications, such as the implementation of viral vectors, tumor RNA, or even tumor-specific peptides (neoantigens), have been studied as a means to avoid resistance and enhance the effectiveness of the vaccines. In this review, we aim to assess the effects of neoantigen-loaded DC vaccines (naDCVs) on the immune response against gastric cancer cells. Materials and methods: A thorough literature search was conducted on PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov for studies assessing the efficacy of naDCVs against gastric cancer both in vivo and in vitro. The studies were assessed for eligibility by two independent reviewers based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The search was completed following the PRISMA guidelines. Results: Eleven studies were included in our systematic review. In five of the studies, the effects of the naDCVs were tested in vitro; in two and in four they were examined both in vitro and in vivo. The in vitro studies showed that the naDCVs resulted in a more robust immune response against the cancer cells in the study groups compared to the control groups. The in vivo studies conducted on mice showed that tumor volume was reduced in the groups treated with the naDCV compared to the untreated groups. What is more, the cytotoxic effect of CTLs against tumor cells was also increased in the vaccine groups. One of the studies was conducted on humans as a phase I study. The results show increased CTL proliferation and cytokine production in the vaccinated group compared to the control, but no difference regarding the tumor size was observed. Conclusions: Neoantigen-loaded DC vaccines can stimulate a strong immune response against specific gastric cancer cell peptides and enhance tumor cell lysis, therefore hindering or even reversing disease progression, offering great potential for the treatment of patients with gastric cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Feature Papers in Section Cancer and Cancer-Related Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 492 KiB  
Review
Research Progress on Varicella-Zoster Virus Vaccines
by Hongjing Liu, Lingyan Cui, Sibo Zhang, Hong Wang, Wenhui Xue, Hai Li, Yuyun Zhang, Lin Chen, Ying Gu, Tingting Li, Ningshao Xia and Shaowei Li
Vaccines 2025, 13(7), 730; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13070730 - 4 Jul 2025
Viewed by 836
Abstract
Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) poses significant public health challenges as the etiological agent of varicella (chickenpox) and herpes zoster (HZ), given its high transmissibility and potential for severe complications. The introduction of VZV vaccines—particularly the vOka-based live attenuated and glycoprotein gE-based recombinant subunit vaccines—has [...] Read more.
Varicella-zoster virus (VZV) poses significant public health challenges as the etiological agent of varicella (chickenpox) and herpes zoster (HZ), given its high transmissibility and potential for severe complications. The introduction of VZV vaccines—particularly the vOka-based live attenuated and glycoprotein gE-based recombinant subunit vaccines—has substantially reduced the global incidence of these diseases. However, live attenuated vaccines raise concerns regarding safety and immunogenicity, especially in immunocompromised populations, while recombinant subunit vaccines, such as Shingrix, exhibit high efficacy but are associated with side effects and adjuvant limitations. Recent advancements in vaccine technology, including mRNA vaccines, viral vector vaccines, and virus-like particle (VLP) vaccines, offer promising alternatives with improved safety profiles and durable immunity. This review synthesizes current knowledge on VZV vaccine mechanisms, clinical applications, and immunization strategies, while also examining future directions in vaccine development. The findings underscore the pivotal role of VZV vaccines in disease prevention and highlight the need for continued research to enhance their public health impact. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Varicella and Zoster Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 944 KiB  
Review
An In Vitro Approach to Prime or Boost Human Antigen-Specific CD8+ T Cell Responses: Applications to Vaccine Studies
by Hoang Oanh Nguyen, Mariela P. Cabral-Piccin, Victor Appay and Laura Papagno
Vaccines 2025, 13(7), 729; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13070729 - 4 Jul 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 555
Abstract
Although vaccine development has primarily focused on inducing neutralizing antibodies, increasing evidence supports an important role of CD8+ T cell responses in vaccine effectiveness. Routine assays, which are mainly based on antibody titers, may therefore not accurately reflect the full immune response [...] Read more.
Although vaccine development has primarily focused on inducing neutralizing antibodies, increasing evidence supports an important role of CD8+ T cell responses in vaccine effectiveness. Routine assays, which are mainly based on antibody titers, may therefore not accurately reflect the full immune response elicited by vaccination. Assessing antigen-specific T cell responses upon vaccination poses several challenges. A common issue in studying T cells specific to a vaccine antigen is their low frequency in circulation, which can limit their ex vivo analysis. Moreover, the use of human cell-based models is crucial for studying and optimizing the induction of T cell responses to design effective vaccines. We developed an innovative in vitro approach of human CD8+ T cell priming, based on the rapid mobilization of dendritic cells (DCs) directly from unfractionated peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). This simple and original method allows for side-by-side comparisons of multiple test parameters in a standardized system, providing both quantitative and qualitative readouts of primed antigen-specific CD8+ T cells. Here, we discuss the genesis of this approach and its versatile applications, including monitoring antigen-specific T cell responses, evaluating an individual’s T cell priming capacity, and conducting preclinical studies on potential adjuvants and vaccine candidates. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Analysis of Vaccine-Induced Adaptive Immune Responses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 567 KiB  
Review
International Patterns in Public Perceptions and Hesitancy Towards a Combined COVID-19 and Influenza Vaccination: A Scoping Review of Five Studies
by Karan Varshney, Ivana Skakic, Prerana Ghosh, Maya V. Raj and Darshan Shet
COVID 2025, 5(7), 103; https://doi.org/10.3390/covid5070103 - 1 Jul 2025
Viewed by 382
Abstract
Introduction: COVID-19 and influenza are viruses that have been major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. While a combination vaccine for these two viruses is currently in development, little is known about public perceptions and attitudes towards such a vaccine. Therefore, we have [...] Read more.
Introduction: COVID-19 and influenza are viruses that have been major causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. While a combination vaccine for these two viruses is currently in development, little is known about public perceptions and attitudes towards such a vaccine. Therefore, we have aimed to conduct a scoping review to evaluate the attitudes and reasons for the acceptance/rejection of a combination COVID-19 and influenza vaccination. Material and Methods: Our review has followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. Search terms included those on COVID-19, influenza, and combination vaccines. Searches were conducted in a total of 10 different databases, as follows: Embase, Global Health, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Medline, Scopus, ScienceDirect, PubMed, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. Results: Searches across all databases produced a total of 1763 results, of which five studies were deemed to be eligible for this review. Data from included studies encompassed a total of 20,581 participants across 14 countries. Generally, participants had favorable views towards a combination vaccine. However, attitudes varied by region, demographics, and prior vaccine exposure. Reasons provided for accepting a combination vaccine include low cost, reasonable effectiveness, fewer injections, and higher safety. However, reasons for rejection of a potential combination vaccine include a potential lack of evidence and studies regarding its effectiveness and a fear of possible side effects. Conclusions: There are generally positive attitudes and perceptions towards a combination vaccination for COVID-19 and influenza, and there are also specific segments of populations that may show hesitancy towards such a vaccine. Vaccination delivery programs should clearly demonstrate that these vaccines are safe and must concurrently address false rumors and misinformation. Ensuring that as many people as possible can receive the vaccination without barriers via equity in access should be a public health priority. It is also important to recognize the limitations of this work, especially that the review was limited to five studies, the majority of which were cross-sectional and relied on self-reporting. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID Public Health and Epidemiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1853 KiB  
Systematic Review
Safety, Immunogenicity, and Efficacy of COVID-19 Vaccines in Radiation–Oncology Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Paul Thöne, Margot Egger, Michael Stephan Gruber, Georg Gruber, Christina Kasassov, Dalma Nyiri, Eva Weis, Helene Werl, Leonhard Trinkl, Wolfgang Lilleby, Martin Clodi, Elisabeth Bräutigam, Benjamin Dieplinger, Annette Aigner and Hans Geinitz
Vaccines 2025, 13(7), 715; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13070715 - 30 Jun 2025
Viewed by 376
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly threatened cancer patients and oncologic care. The rollout of vaccines emerged as a critical milestone, despite the initial lack of evidence regarding their safety and efficacy in this population. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the current [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly threatened cancer patients and oncologic care. The rollout of vaccines emerged as a critical milestone, despite the initial lack of evidence regarding their safety and efficacy in this population. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the current evidence on COVID-19 vaccination in patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT). Methods: PubMed, Livivo, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were systematically reviewed for relevant publications on COVID-19 vaccination in the context of radiation oncology, published by 19 April 2024. The treatment effects were calculated as the proportion of seroconverted individuals. Results: A total of 22 studies published between 2021 and 2024 were included, covering various aspects of vaccination, including safety, tolerability, qualitative and quantitative humoral responses, cellular responses, vaccination efficacy, and booster vaccinations. Notably, patients undergoing RT exhibited a high willingness to receive vaccination. Vaccination was overall well tolerated and safe, with a low incidence of side effects, which were primarily mild. The primary meta-analysis showed a seroconversion proportion of 91% [95% CI: 84–96%] overall, with a somewhat higher proportion of 93% in patients receiving RT alone, compared to 90% in patients receiving either RT or RT combined with chemotherapy. Furthermore, immunization during RT led to a sustained increase in antibody titers, with a notable long-term persistence of IgG. Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccines demonstrate excellent safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy in patients receiving RT, who also exhibit a high willingness to be vaccinated. The outcomes observed are comparable to those in healthy controls and superior to those seen in patients receiving other cancer treatments, such as chemotherapy. The vaccination of radiation oncology patients in future pandemics or epidemics is strongly advocated even during active treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

9 pages, 5714 KiB  
Case Report
Rapid Progression of Cutaneous Lymphoma Following mRNA COVID-19 Vaccination: A Case Report and Pathogenetic Insights
by Berenika Olszewska, Anna Zaryczańska, Michał Bieńkowski, Roman J. Nowicki and Małgorzata Sokołowska-Wojdyło
Vaccines 2025, 13(7), 678; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13070678 - 25 Jun 2025
Viewed by 3315
Abstract
Background: Reports of primary cutaneous lymphomas (CLs) following COVID-19 vaccines are extremely rare. Nevertheless, clinicians should be aware of a potential association between these events. Here, we report a case of the development and rapid progression of mycosis fungoides (MF) with lymph node [...] Read more.
Background: Reports of primary cutaneous lymphomas (CLs) following COVID-19 vaccines are extremely rare. Nevertheless, clinicians should be aware of a potential association between these events. Here, we report a case of the development and rapid progression of mycosis fungoides (MF) with lymph node involvement after COVID-19 vaccination. Case presentation: A 75-year-old female developed disseminated plaques and patches shortly after receiving the first dose of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Within one month following the second dose of the mRNA vaccine, she additionally experienced rapid progression, leading to the development of tumors and inguinal lymphadenopathy. Blood and visceral involvement were excluded. The clinicopathological findings were consistent with the diagnosis of MF, and systemic methotrexate with topical treatment was implemented, resulting in remission of the lesions. Conclusions: The presented case of the development and rapid progression of MF after the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine raises the question of the possible immunomodulatory or oncomodulatory effects of mRNA vaccines. It prompted us to conduct a review outlining the mechanisms potentially causing the mRNA vaccine-associated CLs. We have performed an extensive literature search to determine an explanation for the observed phenomenon. Accumulated evidence suggests a link between CL occurrence and immunization with an mRNA vaccine. The proposed hypothesis revolves around shared signaling pathways that are enhanced by SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines, thus driving the pathogenesis of MF. We want to raise clinicians’ attention to the rare side effects of COVID-19 vaccines and emphasize the need for thorough monitoring of patients with altered immunity in the course of various lymphoproliferative disorders. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Safety and Side Effects in SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 3669 KiB  
Article
Factors Associated with Impaired Humoral Immune Response to mRNA Vaccines in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Matched-Cohort Analysis from the RisCoin Study
by Katarina Csollarova, Leandra Koletzko, Thu Giang Le Thi, Paul R. Wratil, Ana Zhelyazkova, Simone Breiteneicher, Marcel Stern, Gaia Lupoli, Tobias Schwerd, Alexander Choukér, Veit Hornung, Oliver T. Keppler, Kristina Adorjan, Helga Paula Török and Sibylle Koletzko
Vaccines 2025, 13(7), 673; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13070673 - 23 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 503
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic challenged patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) under immunosuppressive therapies. We used data from the RisCoin cohort to investigate factors associated with a poor immune response to mRNA vaccination in these patients. Methods: From 4115 RisCoin participants, we [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic challenged patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) under immunosuppressive therapies. We used data from the RisCoin cohort to investigate factors associated with a poor immune response to mRNA vaccination in these patients. Methods: From 4115 RisCoin participants, we matched 110 IBD patients by age and time interval since the second mRNA vaccination with 306 healthcare workers (HCW) without comorbidities (HCW-healthy) and 292 with medical conditions (HCW-plus); all were SARS-CoV-2 infection naïve. Basic questionnaires collected data on medication, COVID-19 vaccinations and side-effects, dietary patterns, lifestyle factors, and self-perceived stress. Main outcomes included anti-spike immunoglobulin levels and antibody-mediated live-virus neutralization immunity (NT) to the Omicron BA.1 variant (threshold NT ≥ 10 defined as IC50 values ≥1:10 serum dilution) after the second (baseline) and third vaccinations. Results: At baseline, IBD patients treated with anti-TNF but not those under vedolizumab or ustekinumab therapy had lower anti-spike levels compared to HCW-healthy and HCW-plus (166 versus 1384 and 1258 BAU/mL, respectively; p < 0.0001). Anti-TNF compared to vedolizumab/ustekinumab-treated patients reached NT titers above threshold in 17% versus 64%, respectively, and HCW-subgroups in 73% and 79% (all p < 0.0001). Current smokers showed a four to five times increased risk for non-neutralizing immunity compared to non-smokers. After the third vaccination, NT titers did not reach threshold in 15% anti-TNF compared to 5% vedolizumab/ustekinumab-treated patients and none of HCW (p < 0.01). Patients with IBD reported fewer clinical symptoms after vaccination. Perceived stress was not increased. Conclusions: Our findings support individualized schedules for mRNA-based vaccines in IBD patients with different immunosuppressive therapies and enforcement of non-smoking. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section COVID-19 Vaccines and Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2633 KiB  
Review
Implications of Anaphylaxis Following mRNA-LNP Vaccines: It Is Urgent to Eliminate PEG and Find Alternatives
by Jinxing Song, Dihan Su, Hongbing Wu and Jeremy Guo
Pharmaceutics 2025, 17(6), 798; https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics17060798 - 19 Jun 2025
Viewed by 2315
Abstract
The mRNA vaccine has protected humans from the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and has taken the lead in reversing the epidemic efficiently. However, the Centre of Disease Control (CDC) reported and raised the alarm of allergic or acute inflammatory adverse reactions after vaccination [...] Read more.
The mRNA vaccine has protected humans from the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and has taken the lead in reversing the epidemic efficiently. However, the Centre of Disease Control (CDC) reported and raised the alarm of allergic or acute inflammatory adverse reactions after vaccination with mRNA-LNP vaccines. Meanwhile, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has added four black-box warnings in the instructions for mRNA-LNP vaccines. Numerous studies have proven that the observance of side effects after vaccination is indeed positively correlated to the level of anti-PEG antibodies (IgM or IgG), which are enhanced by PEGylated preparations like LNP vaccine and environmental exposure. After literature research and review in the past two decades, it was found that the many clinical trial failures (BIND-014, RB006 fell in phase II) of PEG modified delivery system or PEGylated drug were related to the high expression of anti-PEG IgM and IgG. In the background of shooting multiple mRNA-LNP vaccines in billions of people around the world in the past three years, the level of anti-PEG antibodies in the population may have significantly increased, which brings potential risks for PEG-modified drug development and clinical safety. This review summarizes the experience of using mRNA-LNP vaccines from the mechanism of the anti-PEG antibodies generation, detection methods, clinical failure cases of PEG-containing products, harm analysis of abuse of PEGylation, and alternatives. In light of the increasing prevalence of anti-PEG antibodies in the population and the need to avoid secondary injuries, this review article holds greater significance by offering insights for drug developers. It suggests avoiding the use of PEG excipients when designing PEGylated drugs or PEG-modified nano-formulations and provides references for strategies such as utilizing PEG-free or alternative excipients. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 778 KiB  
Article
Assessing Postnatal Immunisation Services in a Low-Resource Setting: A Cross-Sectional Survey
by Alhassan Sibdow Abukari, Rejoice Gaddah, Emmanuella Vincentia Ayivor, Ibrahim Sadik Haruna and Emmanuel Kwame Korsah
Healthcare 2025, 13(12), 1389; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13121389 - 11 Jun 2025
Viewed by 381
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Postnatal immunisation is critical for maternal and child health, particularly in low-income countries. Despite international efforts, maternal awareness and access to care remain limited. Understanding the drivers behind postnatal immunisation services is critical for improving neonatal and maternal healthcare interventions. Methods: A [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Postnatal immunisation is critical for maternal and child health, particularly in low-income countries. Despite international efforts, maternal awareness and access to care remain limited. Understanding the drivers behind postnatal immunisation services is critical for improving neonatal and maternal healthcare interventions. Methods: A tertiary healthcare facility’s postpartum mothers who were seeking immunisation services participated in a prospective cross-sectional electronic survey. Convenience sampling was used to select respondents, who then answered a structured electronic questionnaire intended to obtain information on immunisation practices. To evaluate important trends and correlations, data was analysed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. A factor analysis was performed using the principal component analysis method, eigenvalue criteria, communalities, and confirmatory factor analysis. The study adhered to the STROBE guidelines. Results: We found that postnatal mothers’ good immunisation practices were influenced by their adherence to immunisation schedules (% variance: 56.407; Eigenvalue: 7.33), and significant satisfaction with communication (% variance: 8.338; Eigenvalue: 1.084); giving a cumulative variance explained of 64.745% of the total variance of variables under study. However, suboptimal practices include limited resource availability, poor record maintenance, insufficient support for side effects, a lack of support from healthcare providers, and a decline in immunisation recommendations, all of which had Eigenvalue <1 and insignificant percentage of variance contribution to the total variance explained. We developed a two-factor model of postnatal immunisation practices, focusing on adherence and effective communication. The model showed high loadings and adequate fit indices (χ2(34) = 91.333, p < 0.001; CFI = 0.945; TLI = 0.927; RMSEA = 0.071; SRMR = 0.042), good evidence of internal consistency (α = 0.823–0.877), and composite reliability (ω = 0.832–0.877). Conclusions: The study recommends a comprehensive approach to increasing newborn vaccine coverage, which includes health education, improved service delivery, and culturally sensitive communication strategies. Future research should focus on digital health interventions, community-based initiatives, and policy-driven postnatal care. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 255 KiB  
Article
Navigating Vaccine Misinformation: Assessing Newly Licensed Physicians’ Ability to Distinguish Facts from Fake News
by Elena Maria Ticozzi, Giovanni Gaetti, Luca Gambolò, Dario Bottignole, Pasquale Di Fronzo, Daniele Solla and Giuseppe Stirparo
Epidemiologia 2025, 6(2), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia6020027 - 10 Jun 2025
Viewed by 519
Abstract
Background: Newly licensed physicians play a significant role in healthcare systems. However, they often lack knowledge about vaccine practices. This study aims to evaluate their ability to distinguish between fake news and the actual side effects of vaccines. Methods: We distributed a questionnaire [...] Read more.
Background: Newly licensed physicians play a significant role in healthcare systems. However, they often lack knowledge about vaccine practices. This study aims to evaluate their ability to distinguish between fake news and the actual side effects of vaccines. Methods: We distributed a questionnaire to assess newly licensed physicians’ knowledge of side effects of vaccines and widespread fake news about them. We enrolled 317 newly licensed Italian physicians. Results: The average questionnaire score was 6.21/10 (SD = ±1.25). Work experience and age did not correlate with scores. Conclusions: Many participants were not able to distinguish between fake news and real vaccines’ side effects (e.g., the possible association between varicella vaccine and seizures). Furthermore, many physicians have been shown to believe in fake news. This lack of knowledge could lead to the inability to scientifically respond to anti-vaccinationists, thus increasing mistrust in medical counseling. Addressing knowledge gaps among recently licensed physicians is crucial to improving proper counseling and increasing public adherence to vaccination campaigns. Full article
17 pages, 636 KiB  
Article
A Multi-Center Study on Sensitization to Thimerosal in North-Eastern Italy, 1997–2023: Prevalence, Risk Factors, the Role of Occupation and the Impact of Vaccinations
by Luca Cegolon, Emilia Patriarca and Francesca Larese Filon
Vaccines 2025, 13(6), 622; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13060622 - 9 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1554
Abstract
Background: Thimerosal has been widely used as a preservative to prevent microbial growth in medications and vaccines. However, in 1999 its removal from vaccine formulations was called for due to concerns about its potential side effects on humans, with subsequent reduced sensitizations [...] Read more.
Background: Thimerosal has been widely used as a preservative to prevent microbial growth in medications and vaccines. However, in 1999 its removal from vaccine formulations was called for due to concerns about its potential side effects on humans, with subsequent reduced sensitizations at patch tests. The present multi-center study investigated the epidemiological, occupational and temporal pattern of sensitization to Thimerosal in North-Eastern Italy during 1997–2023 and associated factors. Methods: Due to variability in patch testing and positive reactions by the centers, this study was broken down by three periods: 1997–2004 (including all centers but Trieste); 1997–2015 (considering only Padua and Pordenone); and 2010–2023 (considering only Trieste and Pordenone). Multiple logistic regression was used to investigate prevalence of sensitization to Thimerosal and associated factors. Results were expressed as adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Results: Prevalence of positive patch test reactions to Thimerosal decreased from (8.13%) in 1997 to 0.95% in 2023 across all centers combined. Prevalence of positivity to Thimerosal was 9.49% during 1997–2004 (in all centers yet excluding Trieste), 8.41% during 1997–2015 (considering only Padua and Pordenone) and 4.01% during 2010–2023 (considering only Trieste and Pordenone). A significantly decreasing trend of Thimerosal sensitization was observed during 1997–2015 (aOR = 0.94; 95%CI: 0.92; 0.95). Regardless of the study period, sensitization to Thimerosal was consistently and significantly higher among health care workers (HCWs) and in patients born during 1981–1990. Conclusions: The significantly decreasing prevalence of sensitization to Thimerosal over time likely reflected removal policies from vaccines and medications after 1999. Likewise, the higher prevalence of patch test reactions in patients born during 1981–1990 may mirror the widespread presence of this hapten in vaccines and medications in the 1980ies. Moreover, the increased prevalence of patch test reactions positive to Thimerosal in HCWs probably reflected higher influenza vaccination uptake in this group compared to other occupational categories. Positive patch test reactions to Thimerosal after 2000 were likely clinically irrelevant though. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Epidemiology and Vaccination)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1626 KiB  
Article
A Comparison of Tests for Detecting Prior Exposure to Coxiella burnetii for Use with Q-VAX in Australian Human Q Fever Vaccination
by Stephen Graves, Jennifer Robson, Anja Scholzen, Richard Dzeng, Francisca Powell-Romero, Jennifer Evans, John Stenos, Meg Jeppesen, Milou L. C. E. Kouwijzer, Jordi Lankhof, Susan Raju Paul, Tatiana Proboste Ibertti, Lauren Ball, Helen Powell, Stephanie Wilkinson, Evi van Schuppen, Willemijn J. Anker-Op den Brouw, Rowland Cobbold, Anja Garritsen, Mark C. Poznansky and Ann E. Sluderadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Vaccines 2025, 13(6), 615; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines13060615 - 6 Jun 2025
Viewed by 656
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Q-VAX vaccine, approved in Australia, prevents Q fever. However, individuals with prior Coxiella burnetii (Cb) infection have an increased risk of adverse reactions, requiring pre-vaccination screening by an intradermal hypersensitivity skin test for cell-mediated immune memory and a serological assay [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Q-VAX vaccine, approved in Australia, prevents Q fever. However, individuals with prior Coxiella burnetii (Cb) infection have an increased risk of adverse reactions, requiring pre-vaccination screening by an intradermal hypersensitivity skin test for cell-mediated immune memory and a serological assay for anti-Cb antibodies. The week-long interval for skin test assessment limits efficient vaccination. This study evaluated a standardized interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) as a potential skin test alternative. Methods: Immune assays were compared in Australian populations with different incidences of prior Cb exposure. Cell-mediated immunity was assessed by the Q-VAX skin test and IGRA. Serological status was evaluated with established diagnostic assays. Hypothetical vaccine eligibility decisions using combined IGRA and serology results were compared with actual clinical decisions made using current guidelines. Results: All tests performed better in detecting prior infection than in detecting prior vaccination. Only the IGRA identified all individuals with a known history of Q fever. Agreement between the skin test and IGRA was limited. Moderate agreement was observed between hypothetical vaccine eligibility determinations based on IGRA plus serology results and actual clinical decisions. IGRA-positive but serology- and skin test-negative individuals received Q-VAX without clinically significant side effects, suggesting that elevated IGRA responses alone are not predictive of susceptibility to vaccine reactogenicity. Conclusions: The IGRA is not yet a suitable skin test replacement when assessing eligibility for Q fever vaccination, despite the significant limitations of the latter. We offer recommendations for designing future studies that might allow the development of appropriate guidelines for IGRA use in vaccine eligibility screening. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Vaccines against Infectious Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 547 KiB  
Review
The Immunomodulatory Role of Galectin-1 in the Tumour Microenvironment and Strategies for Therapeutic Applications
by Alice Griffiths, Palita Udomjarumanee, Andrei-Stefan Georgescu, Muruj Barri, Dmitry A. Zinovkin and Md Zahidul I. Pranjol
Cancers 2025, 17(11), 1888; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17111888 - 5 Jun 2025
Viewed by 751
Abstract
With the morbidity of cancer currently on a perpetual rise, there is a critical need for new treatment options. Current therapeutic options, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, are frequently employed; however, the high rate of recurrence underscores the incomplete understanding of tumour growth, [...] Read more.
With the morbidity of cancer currently on a perpetual rise, there is a critical need for new treatment options. Current therapeutic options, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy, are frequently employed; however, the high rate of recurrence underscores the incomplete understanding of tumour growth, progression, and the intricacies of their microenvironments. In this study, we review the roles that galectin-1 (Gal1) plays in suppressing immune surveillance in the tumour microenvironment. Studies have shown that Gal1 changes the immune system parameters: suppressing T cell function, sensitising resting T lymphocytes to Fas/FasL, decreasing cell proliferation, reducing adhesion to extracellular matrix, inhibiting Th1 cytokines, increasing M2 phenotype macrophages, and promoting angiogenesis. Gal1 has garnered increasing attention as a potential therapeutic target due to its involvement in tumour progression and immune evasion. Given the limitations and toxic side effects associated with current treatment options, alternative strategies targeting Gal1 have been explored for their therapeutic potential. Approaches such as OTX008, anti-Gal1 monoclonal antibodies, and Gal1-targeted vaccines have demonstrated the ability to downregulate tumour progression by inhibiting Gal1 activity. These findings highlight the therapeutic promise of Gal1 not only as a novel target for cancer therapy but also as a potential prognostic biomarker, offering opportunities for the development of more effective and less toxic treatment strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Targeting the Tumor Microenvironment (Volume II))
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop