Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (64)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = tirzepatide

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
19 pages, 397 KiB  
Review
Effects of Blood-Glucose Lowering Therapies on Body Composition and Muscle Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes: A Narrative Review
by Ioana Bujdei-Tebeică, Doina Andrada Mihai, Anca Mihaela Pantea-Stoian, Simona Diana Ștefan, Claudiu Stoicescu and Cristian Serafinceanu
Medicina 2025, 61(8), 1399; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61081399 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 196
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) extends beyond glycemic control, requiring a more global strategy that includes optimization of body composition, even more so in the context of sarcopenia and visceral adiposity, as they contribute to poor outcomes. [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) extends beyond glycemic control, requiring a more global strategy that includes optimization of body composition, even more so in the context of sarcopenia and visceral adiposity, as they contribute to poor outcomes. Past reviews have typically been focused on weight reduction or glycemic effectiveness, with limited inclusion of new therapies’ effects on muscle and fat distribution. In addition, the emergence of incretin-based therapies and dual agonists such as tirzepatide requires an updated synthesis of their impacts on body composition. This review attempts to bridge the gap by taking a systematic approach to how current blood-glucose lowering therapies affect lean body mass, fat mass, and the risk of sarcopenia in T2D patients. Materials and Methods: Between January 2015 and March 2025, we conducted a narrative review by searching the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for English-language articles. The keywords were combinations of the following: “type 2 diabetes,” “lean body mass,” “fat mass,” “body composition,” “sarcopenia,” “GLP-1 receptor agonists,” “SGLT2 inhibitors,” “tirzepatide,” and “antidiabetic pharmacotherapy.” Reference lists were searched manually as well. The highest precedence was assigned to studies that aimed at adult type 2 diabetic subjects and reported body composition results. Inclusion criteria for studies were: (1) type 2 diabetic mellitus adult patients and (2) reporting measures of body composition (e.g., lean body mass, fat mass, or muscle function). We prioritized randomized controlled trials and large observational studies and excluded mixed diabetic populations, non-pharmacological interventions only, and poor reporting of body composition. Results: Metformin was widely found to be weight-neutral with minimal effects on muscle mass. Insulin therapy, being an anabolic hormone, often leads to fat mass accumulation and increases the risk of sarcopenic obesity. Incretin-based therapies induced substantial weight loss, mostly from fat mass. Notable results were observed in studies with tirzepatide, demonstrating superior reduction not only in fat mass, but also in visceral fat. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2 inhibitors) promote fat loss but are associated with a small yet significant decrease in lean muscle mass. Conclusions: Blood-glucose lowering therapies demonstrated clinically relevant effects on body composition. Treatment should be personalized, balancing glycemic control, cardiovascular, and renal benefits, together with optimal impact on muscle mass along with glycemic, cardiovascular, and renal benefits. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Endocrinology)
22 pages, 1317 KiB  
Review
Obesity: Clinical Impact, Pathophysiology, Complications, and Modern Innovations in Therapeutic Strategies
by Mohammad Iftekhar Ullah and Sadeka Tamanna
Medicines 2025, 12(3), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicines12030019 - 28 Jul 2025
Viewed by 700
Abstract
Obesity is a growing global health concern with widespread impacts on physical, psychological, and social well-being. Clinically, it is a major driver of type 2 diabetes (T2D), cardiovascular disease (CVD), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and cancer, reducing life expectancy by 5–20 years [...] Read more.
Obesity is a growing global health concern with widespread impacts on physical, psychological, and social well-being. Clinically, it is a major driver of type 2 diabetes (T2D), cardiovascular disease (CVD), non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and cancer, reducing life expectancy by 5–20 years and imposing a staggering economic burden of USD 2 trillion annually (2.8% of global GDP). Despite its significant health and socioeconomic impact, earlier obesity medications, such as fenfluramine, sibutramine, and orlistat, fell short of expectations due to limited effectiveness, serious side effects including valvular heart disease and gastrointestinal issues, and high rates of treatment discontinuation. The advent of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (e.g., semaglutide, tirzepatide) has revolutionized obesity management. These agents demonstrate unprecedented efficacy, achieving 15–25% mean weight loss in clinical trials, alongside reducing major adverse cardiovascular events by 20% and T2D incidence by 72%. Emerging therapies, including oral GLP-1 agonists and triple-receptor agonists (e.g., retatrutide), promise enhanced tolerability and muscle preservation, potentially bridging the efficacy gap with bariatric surgery. However, challenges persist. High costs, supply shortages, and unequal access pose significant barriers to the widespread implementation of obesity treatment, particularly in low-resource settings. Gastrointestinal side effects and long-term safety concerns require close monitoring, while weight regain after medication discontinuation emphasizes the need for ongoing adherence and lifestyle support. This review highlights the transformative potential of incretin-based therapies while advocating for policy reforms to address cost barriers, equitable access, and preventive strategies. Future research must prioritize long-term cardiovascular outcome trials and mitigate emerging risks, such as sarcopenia and joint degeneration. A multidisciplinary approach combining pharmacotherapy, behavioral interventions, and systemic policy changes is critical to curbing the obesity epidemic and its downstream consequences. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1004 KiB  
Article
Beyond Weight Loss: Comparative Effects of Tirzepatide Plus Low-Energy Ketogenic Versus Low-Calorie Diet on Hepatic Steatosis and Stiffness in MASLD
by Luigi Schiavo, Biagio Santella, Monica Mingo, Gianluca Rossetti, Marcello Orio and Vincenzo Pilone
Nutrients 2025, 17(15), 2409; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17152409 - 24 Jul 2025
Viewed by 432
Abstract
Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the most common chronic liver condition globally, strongly linked to obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Tirzepatide (TZP), a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist, improves glycemic control and reduces body weight and the [...] Read more.
Background: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the most common chronic liver condition globally, strongly linked to obesity, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Tirzepatide (TZP), a dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist, improves glycemic control and reduces body weight and the liver fat content in patients with obesity and T2D. However, its effect on liver-specific outcomes such as steatosis and fibrosis remains incompletely characterized. Low-energy ketogenic therapy (LEKT), a nutritional strategy characterized by carbohydrate restriction and nutritional ketosis, may enhance hepatic β-oxidation and reduce hepatic lipogenesis. To date, however, the combination of TZP and LEKT has not been studied in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). This study aimed to compare the hepatic and metabolic effects of TZP combined with either LEKT or a conventional low-calorie diet (LCD) over a 12-week period. Methods: Sixty adult patients with MASLD undergoing TZP therapy were prospectively assigned to either an LEKT or a conventional LCD, with 30 participants per group. As primary endpoints, the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP, an index of hepatic steatosis) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM, an index of liver fibrosis) were assessed at the baseline and after 12 weeks using FibroScan®. Secondary outcomes included changes in body mass index (BMI), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and liver enzymes. Adherence to both diet and pharmacological treatment, as well as tolerability, were systematically monitored throughout the intervention period. Results: Both groups showed significant reductions in body weight (TZP + LEKT, p = 0.0289; TZP + LCD, p = 0.0278), with no significant intergroup difference (p = 0.665). CAP and LSM improved significantly in both groups, but reductions were greater in the TZP + LEKT group (CAP −12.5%, p < 0.001; LSM −22.7%, p < 0.001) versus LCD (CAP −6.7%, p = 0.014; LSM −9.2%, p = 0.022). Between-group differences were statistically significant for both CAP (p = 0.01) and LSM (p = 0.03). Conclusions: Based on these preliminary findings, we support the hypothesis that the combination of TZP and LEKT may be superior to TZP with an LCD in reducing hepatic steatosis and stiffness in individuals with obesity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 351 KiB  
Review
Obesity and Pancreatic Diseases: From Inflammation to Oncogenesis and the Impact of Weight Loss Interventions
by Mariana Souto, Tiago Cúrdia Gonçalves and José Cotter
Nutrients 2025, 17(14), 2310; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu17142310 - 14 Jul 2025
Viewed by 840
Abstract
Background: Obesity is a growing global health concern and a modifiable risk factor for multiple pancreatic diseases, including acute pancreatitis (AP), chronic pancreatitis (CP), and pancreatic cancer (PC). While these conditions have distinct clinical courses, obesity contributes to their pathogenesis through shared [...] Read more.
Background: Obesity is a growing global health concern and a modifiable risk factor for multiple pancreatic diseases, including acute pancreatitis (AP), chronic pancreatitis (CP), and pancreatic cancer (PC). While these conditions have distinct clinical courses, obesity contributes to their pathogenesis through shared mechanisms, such as visceral adiposity, systemic inflammation, insulin resistance, and ectopic pancreatic fat deposition. Methods: This narrative review synthesizes current evidence from clinical, epidemiological, and mechanistic studies exploring the relationship between obesity and pancreatic diseases. We also critically evaluate the effects of weight loss interventions—including lifestyle modifications, pharmacologic therapies, endoscopic approaches, and bariatric surgery—on the risk and progression of disease. Results: Obesity increases the risk and severity of AP via mechanisms such as gallstone formation, hypertriglyceridemia, and lipotoxicity. In CP, obesity-related intrapancreatic fat and metabolic dysfunction may influence disease progression, although some data suggest a paradoxical protective effect. In PC, obesity accelerates tumorigenesis through chronic inflammation, adipokine imbalance, and activation of oncogenic signaling pathways. Weight loss interventions, particularly bariatric surgery and incretin-based therapies (e.g., GLP-1 receptor agonists and dual agonists such as tirzepatide), show promising effects in reducing disease burden and improving metabolic and inflammatory profiles relevant to pancreatic pathology. Conclusions: Obesity plays a multifaceted role in the pathophysiology of pancreatic diseases. Therapeutic strategies targeting weight loss may alter disease trajectories, improve outcomes, and reduce cancer risk. Further research is needed to define optimal intervention strategies and to identify and validate biomarkers for personalized risk assessment and prevention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dietary and Nutritional Therapies to Improve Digestive Disorders)
19 pages, 3309 KiB  
Review
Obesity-Related Glomerulosclerosis—How Adiposity Damages the Kidneys
by Justyna Zbrzeźniak-Suszczewicz, Agata Winiarska, Agnieszka Perkowska-Ptasińska and Tomasz Stompór
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(13), 6247; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26136247 - 28 Jun 2025
Viewed by 712
Abstract
Obesity, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) constitute the deadly trinity of modern threats for populations of both developed and developing countries. These diseases (together with type 2 diabetes) are closely linked in their pathophysiology and result in increasing cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and [...] Read more.
Obesity, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease (CKD) constitute the deadly trinity of modern threats for populations of both developed and developing countries. These diseases (together with type 2 diabetes) are closely linked in their pathophysiology and result in increasing cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and premature death from CV causes. In this review, we focused on the kidney as the target of obesity-related disorders. Obesity-related glomerulosclerosis (ORG) represents a pattern of renal injury caused solely or predominantly by obesity; usually, it is superimposed on chronic kidney disease (CKD) from other causes, such as diabetic kidney disease, hypertensive kidney disease, type 2 cardiorenal syndrome, primary or secondary glomerulopathies, and others. Adipose tissue contributes to kidney injury in several ways: it releases proinflammatory cytokines and growth factors, leading to podocyte and mesangial cell injury and glomerulosclerosis. In particular, perirenal adipose tissue (PRAT), besides exerting paracrine and endocrine effects on the kidney, modifies its function via compression on renal parenchyma and vessels. The intrinsic ability of the kidneys in obesity to increase the reabsorption of sodium warrants intraglomerular hypertension and hyperfiltration, followed by progressive renal injury. Lifestyle interventions and pharmacological agents, as well as metabolic (bariatric) surgery resulting in weight reduction, may also be beneficial for the kidneys. Using GLP1 receptor agonists (with a special focus on subcutaneous semaglutide and tirzepatide) seems to be the most promising treatment strategy for preventing kidney injury in obese individuals. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 602 KiB  
Systematic Review
Addressing the Shortage of GLP-1 RA and Dual GIP/GLP-1 RA-Based Therapies—A Systematic Review
by Velimir Altabas, Zrinka Orlović and Maja Baretić
Diabetology 2025, 6(6), 52; https://doi.org/10.3390/diabetology6060052 - 5 Jun 2025
Viewed by 2348
Abstract
Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide/glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GIP/GLP-1 RAs) have transformed disease management, particularly in diabetes and obesity. However, recent shortages have disrupted patient care. This review explores the current evidence regarding their direct impact [...] Read more.
Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide/glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GIP/GLP-1 RAs) have transformed disease management, particularly in diabetes and obesity. However, recent shortages have disrupted patient care. This review explores the current evidence regarding their direct impact on patient populations and reviews the mitigation strategies recommended by relevant health organizations. Materials and Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published from the earliest available data to 10 January 2025, using these terms: “GLP-1 AND shortage”, “liraglutide AND shortage”, “dulaglutide AND shortage”, “semaglutide AND shortage”, “exenatide AND shortage”, and “tirzepatide AND shortage”. Eligible studies needed to report measurable outcomes like prescription counts, specific laboratory findings, or the proportion of a study population achieving a defined outcome related to the shortage. Only English-language clinical research was considered, while other manuscripts were not included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist. Study characteristics and findings were summarized in tables. Results: Out of 295 identified manuscripts, 85 works were retained for further screening. Consequently, 8 studies met the inclusion criteria, covering 1036 participants with type 2 diabetes and 573 treated for obesity. In addition, two studies reported prescription prevalence, and one examined prescription counts. Key findings included reduced prescription rates and shifts in treatment practices. No studies assessed impacts on cardiovascular, renal outcomes, or mortality. Discussion and Conclusions: Evidence on the health effects of these shortages is limited. Existing studies highlight disruptions in diabetes and obesity care, but broader impacts remain unclear. Preventing future shortages requires coordinated efforts among all stakeholders. Therefore, we advocate for ethical planning, sustainable production, and fair distribution strategies to mitigate long-term consequences. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 704 KiB  
Review
The Premise of the Paradox: Examining the Evidence That Motivated GIPR Agonist and Antagonist Drug Development Programs
by Jonathan D. Douros, Stephanie A. Mowery and Patrick J. Knerr
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(11), 3812; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113812 - 29 May 2025
Viewed by 1344
Abstract
Emerging clinical data support the paradoxical notion that glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor (GIPR) agonism and antagonism can provide additive weight loss when combined with a glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor (GLP-1R) agonist. In this review, we examine data that motivated the initiation [...] Read more.
Emerging clinical data support the paradoxical notion that glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor (GIPR) agonism and antagonism can provide additive weight loss when combined with a glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor (GLP-1R) agonist. In this review, we examine data that motivated the initiation of these seemingly contradictory drug discovery programs. We focus on the physiologic role of GIP in humans, human genetics evidence, rodent genetic models, and preclinical rodent and non-human primate pharmacology studies. Furthermore, we highlight where early preclinical findings translated into relevant clinical efficacy in the development of tirzepatide and maridebart cafraglutide (MariTide). Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Endocrinology & Metabolism)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 392 KiB  
Review
Weight Regain After Liraglutide, Semaglutide or Tirzepatide Interruption: A Narrative Review of Randomized Studies
by Massimo Quarenghi, Silvia Capelli, Giulia Galligani, Arianna Giana, Giorgia Preatoni and Rosamaria Turri Quarenghi
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(11), 3791; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113791 - 28 May 2025
Viewed by 4365
Abstract
Objectives: The primary objective of this review is to analyze the effects on body weight of discontinuing therapy with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) or tirzepatide in patients treated for obesity. In recent months, there has been a considerable increase in the [...] Read more.
Objectives: The primary objective of this review is to analyze the effects on body weight of discontinuing therapy with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) or tirzepatide in patients treated for obesity. In recent months, there has been a considerable increase in the utilization of GLP-1 RAs and GIP/GLP-1 RAs. However, the paucity of available data regarding their medium- to long-term safety remains a salient concern. Of particular significance is the observation of the weight curve following their suspension, a subject that has received scant attention to date. Methods: For this, a bibliographic search was carried out in three electronic databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar. The following filters were applied: in the last 10 years, Randomized Controlled Trial, Adult: 19+ years. The review was restricted to randomized controlled trials to reduce bias and ensure the high quality of the studies examined. A total of 427 references were identified, 178 articles were read in full, and 13 articles were included in the analysis. Results and Conclusions: The analysis showed a rapid regain of weight after cessation of therapy, regardless of the duration of the treatment with GLP-1 RA or GIP/GLP-1 RA. This rebound is likely to substantially mitigate the metabolic benefits attained through weight loss. Given the efficacy of these drugs, it is essential for future research to focus on elucidating the optimal duration of these treatments or identifying techniques or schemes that involve a reduction in dosages to prevent weight regain. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section General Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1665 KiB  
Article
Survival Benefits of GLP-1 Receptor Agonists in Patients with Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Large-Scale Propensity-Matched Cohort Study
by Manal S. Fawzy, Awwad Alenezy, Jessan A. Jishu, Issa Khan, Ahmad Dessouky, Ahmed Abdelmaksoud, Kristen E. Limbach and Eman A. Toraih
Cancers 2025, 17(9), 1593; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17091593 - 7 May 2025
Viewed by 1422
Abstract
Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies that consist of two major subtypes: neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ra) have demonstrated favorable results in preclinical studies, but their impact on NEN outcomes remains unexplored. [...] Read more.
Background: Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) represent a heterogeneous group of malignancies that consist of two major subtypes: neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) and neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ra) have demonstrated favorable results in preclinical studies, but their impact on NEN outcomes remains unexplored. Methods: Using the TriNetX US Research Network, we identified adult patients with NEN and either diabetes or obesity. After 1:1 propensity score matching based on demographics, comorbidities, procedures, and medication use, we compared survival outcomes between patients who received GLP-1Ra after NEN diagnosis and those who did not. Results: Among 32,464 eligible patients, 3139 received GLP-1Ra and 29,325 did not. After propensity matching, each cohort included 3043 patients with well-balanced baseline characteristics. During follow-up periods extending up to 15 years, all-cause mortality occurred in 356 (11.7%) GLP-1Ra users versus 753 (24.7%) non-users, representing a 13.0% absolute risk reduction (p < 0.001). GLP-1Ra use was associated with significantly improved survival (HR = 0.56, 95%CI = 0.49–0.63, p < 0.001). Both well-differentiated (HR = 0.52) and poorly differentiated tumors (HR = 0.56) showed significant improvement. Among primary sites, lung NENs demonstrated the most pronounced benefit (HR = 0.42). Tirzepatide showed the strongest association with reduced mortality (HR = 0.16), followed by semaglutide (HR = 0.27) and dulaglutide (HR = 0.52). Results: In this large propensity-matched study, GLP-1Ra use was associated with a 44.3% reduction in mortality risk among NEN patients with diabetes or obesity. The magnitude of the observed benefit suggests a potential role for GLP-1Ra as adjunctive therapy in this patient population. Prospective clinical trials are warranted to confirm these findings and explore underlying mechanisms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Clinical Research of Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 650 KiB  
Review
Exploring the Protective Effects of Traditional Antidiabetic Medications and Novel Antihyperglycemic Agents in Diabetic Rodent Models
by Cosmin Gabriel Tartau, Ianis Kevyn Stefan Boboc, Liliana Mititelu-Tartau, Maria Bogdan, Beatrice Rozalina Buca, Liliana Lacramioara Pavel and Cornelia Amalinei
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(5), 670; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18050670 - 1 May 2025
Viewed by 909
Abstract
Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) is a complex metabolic disorder that affects multiple organs, leading to severe complications in the pancreas, kidneys, liver, and heart. Prolonged hyperglycemia, along with oxidative stress and chronic inflammation, plays a crucial role in accelerating tissue damage, significantly increasing [...] Read more.
Type 2 Diabetes (T2D) is a complex metabolic disorder that affects multiple organs, leading to severe complications in the pancreas, kidneys, liver, and heart. Prolonged hyperglycemia, along with oxidative stress and chronic inflammation, plays a crucial role in accelerating tissue damage, significantly increasing the risk of diabetic complications such as nephropathy, hepatopathy, and cardiovascular disease. This review evaluates the protective effects of various antidiabetic treatments on organ tissues affected by T2D, based on findings from experimental animal models. Metformin, a first-line antidiabetic agent, has been widely recognized for its ability to reduce inflammation and oxidative stress, thereby mitigating diabetes-induced organ damage. Its protective role extends beyond glucose regulation, offering benefits such as improved mitochondrial function and reduced fibrosis in affected tissues. In addition to traditional therapies, new classes of antidiabetic drugs, including sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists not only improve glycemic control but also exhibit nephroprotective and cardioprotective properties by reducing glomerular hyperfiltration, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Similarly, GLP-1 receptor agonists have been associated with reduced hepatic steatosis and enhanced cardiovascular function. Preclinical studies suggest that tirzepatide, a dual GLP-1/gastric inhibitory polypeptide receptor agonist may offer superior metabolic benefits compared to conventional GLP-1 agonists by improving β-cell function, enhancing insulin sensitivity, and reducing fatty liver progression. Despite promising preclinical results, differences between animal models and human physiology pose a challenge. Further clinical research is needed to confirm these effects and refine treatment strategies. Future T2D management aims to go beyond glycemic control, emphasizing organ protection and long-term disease prevention. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The 20th Anniversary of Pharmaceuticals—Advances in Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 538 KiB  
Systematic Review
The Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide in Patients with Diabetes and/or Obesity: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
by Ligang Liu, Hekai Shi, Merilyn Xie, Yuxiao Sun and Milap C. Nahata
Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18(5), 668; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18050668 - 30 Apr 2025
Viewed by 4277
Abstract
Background: Obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are major public health concerns. Tirzepatide has shown promise in recent clinical trials. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide in adults with obesity or type 2 diabetes, compared [...] Read more.
Background: Obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are major public health concerns. Tirzepatide has shown promise in recent clinical trials. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide in adults with obesity or type 2 diabetes, compared to placebo, GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), and insulin. Method: PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched on 17 January 2024, focusing on phase II and III randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We included studies involving adults with T2D or obesity, comparing tirzepatide to placebo, GLP-1 RAs, or insulin. The primary outcomes were the proportion of participants achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, and ≥15% weight loss targets. Secondary outcomes included changes in body weight, waist circumference, HbA1c levels, and blood pressure. Safety outcomes focused on adverse event rates. Meta-analyses were performed, and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk-of-Bias tool version 2. Results: Fourteen RCTs involving 14,713 patients were included. Tirzepatide significantly increased the proportion of participants achieving weight loss targets, and reduced body weight, waist circumference, HbA1c, and blood pressure versus placebo and insulin. Compared with GLP-1 RAs, tirzepatide provided comparable or better outcomes in weight loss, waist circumference, and glycemic control. The incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events was significantly higher at all doses of tirzepatide compared to placebo and insulin. When compared with GLP-1 RAs, higher doses of tirzepatide were associated with increased risk of nausea, diarrhea, and decreased appetite, but not vomiting. Conclusions: Tirzepatide is an effective option for managing weight and improving metabolic outcomes in patients with T2D or obesity. However, it is associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal adverse events, especially at higher doses. Therefore, close monitoring should be considered in clinical practice. Registration: PROSPERO CRD42021283449. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pharmacology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2759 KiB  
Article
The Risk of Vestibular Disorders with Semaglutide and Tirzepatide: Findings from a Large Real-World Cohort
by Eman A. Toraih, Awwad Alenezy, Mohammad H. Hussein, Shahmeer Hashmat, Saitej Mummadi, Nawaf Farhan Alrawili, Ahmed Abdelmaksoud and Manal S. Fawzy
Biomedicines 2025, 13(5), 1049; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13051049 - 26 Apr 2025
Viewed by 3134
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have revolutionized the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. While their metabolic benefits are well-established, their potential effects on vestibular function remain unexplored. This study investigated the association between GLP-1RA use and the risk of [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have revolutionized the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity. While their metabolic benefits are well-established, their potential effects on vestibular function remain unexplored. This study investigated the association between GLP-1RA use and the risk of vestibular disorders. Methods: Using the TriNetX research network (accessed 3 November 2024), we conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults prescribed semaglutide (n = 419,497) or tirzepatide (n = 77,259) between January 2018 and October 2024. Cases were matched 1:1 with controls using propensity scores based on demographics and comorbidities. The primary outcome was new-onset vestibular disorders, analyzed at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years after treatment initiation. Results: Both medications were associated with an increased risk of vestibular disorders. Semaglutide users showed a higher cumulative incidence (0.12% at 6 months to 0.41% at 3 years) compared to controls (0.03% to 0.16%, p < 0.001), with hazard ratios ranging from 4.02 (95% CI: 3.33–4.86) at 6 months to 4.95 (95% CI: 4.51–5.43) at 3 years. Tirzepatide users demonstrated similar patterns but lower absolute rates (0.10% at 6 months to 0.19% at 3 years vs. controls 0.04% to 0.15%), with hazard ratios from 3.19 (95% CI: 2.11–4.81) to 4.55 (95% CI: 3.43–6.03). The direct comparison showed a higher risk with semaglutide versus tirzepatide (RR 1.53–2.04, p < 0.001). Conclusions: GLP-1RA therapy is associated with an increased risk of vestibular disorders, with a higher risk observed with semaglutide compared to tirzepatide. These findings suggest the need for vestibular symptom monitoring in patients receiving these medications and warrant further investigation into underlying mechanisms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diabetes: Comorbidities, Therapeutics and Insights (2nd Edition))
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 3261 KiB  
Systematic Review
Symptomatic Adverse Events and Quality of Life Related to Incretin-Based Medicines for Obesity: A Systematic Review Involving >400,000 Subjects
by Robert F. Kushner, Odd Erik Johansen, Krysmaru Araujo Torres, Trà-Mi Phan and Agnieszka Marczewska
Obesities 2025, 5(2), 29; https://doi.org/10.3390/obesities5020029 - 24 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1168
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Obesity is a chronic, progressive, recurrent disease associated with impaired health, affecting an increasing proportion of the population worldwide. Newer-generation incretin-based therapies (IBTs) (liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide) have shown greater efficacy than older anti-obesity medications. This systematic literature review provides an overview [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Obesity is a chronic, progressive, recurrent disease associated with impaired health, affecting an increasing proportion of the population worldwide. Newer-generation incretin-based therapies (IBTs) (liraglutide, semaglutide, and tirzepatide) have shown greater efficacy than older anti-obesity medications. This systematic literature review provides an overview of the evidence on the symptomatic adverse events (AEs) and patient-reported outcomes of IBTs to facilitate clinical decision-making. Methods: A systematic search was conducted using a predefined search strategy to identify controlled trials and real-world evidence (RWE) studies assessing IBTs. Results: Among 4414 publications identified, 81 (>400,000 participants) were included. Liraglutide (n = 49), semaglutide (n = 34), and tirzepatide (n = 7) were used in 48 clinical and 33 RWE studies. Gastrointestinal (GI) AEs were most common: placebo-subtracted incidences were 5–39% for nausea, −7–39% for diarrhea, 2–31% for constipation, 0–26% for vomiting, and 2–20% for abdominal pain, with no clear difference across IBTs. Most AEs were mild or moderate and mainly occurred during dose escalation. Quality of life outcomes were reported in 27 publications and generally showed improvements with IBTs. Conclusions: This study confirms that GI AEs are common with IBTs. Clinicians should keep the AE profile of IBTs in mind and consider where additional preventative measures may be required. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 1185 KiB  
Review
Current and Emerging Parenteral and Peroral Medications for Weight Loss: A Narrative Review
by Abdullah Al Lawati, Ayman Alhabsi, Rhieya Rahul, Maria-Luisa Savino, Hamed Alwahaibi, Srijit Das and Hanan Al Lawati
Diseases 2025, 13(5), 129; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13050129 - 22 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1645
Abstract
Obesity is a growing global health challenge, necessitating effective treatment options beyond lifestyle interventions. This narrative review explores established and emerging pharmacotherapies for weight management, including parenteral agents like Liraglutide, Semaglutide, Setmelanotide, and Tirzepatide, as well as peroral medications such as Phentermine, Phentermine/Topiramate, [...] Read more.
Obesity is a growing global health challenge, necessitating effective treatment options beyond lifestyle interventions. This narrative review explores established and emerging pharmacotherapies for weight management, including parenteral agents like Liraglutide, Semaglutide, Setmelanotide, and Tirzepatide, as well as peroral medications such as Phentermine, Phentermine/Topiramate, Bupropion/Naltrexone, Orlistat, and Metformin. Newer treatments like Cagrilintide and Bimagrumab show promise for enhancing weight loss outcomes. Parenteral GLP-1 receptor agonists demonstrate superior efficacy compared to traditional peroral medications, with gastrointestinal side effects being the most common. Artificial intelligence presents intriguing opportunities to enhance weight loss strategies; however, its integration into clinical practice remains investigational and requires rigorous clinical validation. While current anti-obesity medications deliver significant benefits, future research must determine the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of AI-driven approaches. This includes exploring how AI can complement combination therapies and tailor personalized interventions, thereby grounding its potential benefits in robust clinical evidence. Future directions will focus on integrating AI into clinical trials to refine and personalize obesity management strategies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 994 KiB  
Review
Efficacy and Safety of Tirzepatide for Weight Management in Non-Diabetic Obese Individuals: A Narrative Review
by Mohammed Sallam, Johan Snygg, Sara El Ghandour and Malik Sallam
Obesities 2025, 5(2), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/obesities5020026 - 18 Apr 2025
Viewed by 6205
Abstract
Obesity represents a global health challenge, with a critical and urgent need for long-term, sustainable management strategies. Tirzepatide is a novel dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist. At first approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, [...] Read more.
Obesity represents a global health challenge, with a critical and urgent need for long-term, sustainable management strategies. Tirzepatide is a novel dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist. At first approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, tirzepatide represents one of the latest clinically approved and commercially available pharmacological options for obesity management. This narrative review aimed to synthesize existing clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide in non-diabetic obese individuals. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar databases to identify relevant clinical trials, meta-analyses, and original studies assessing the weight-loss impact of tirzepatide from 2022 onwards. Synthesized evidence indicated that tirzepatide achieved up to 20.9% weight loss over 72 weeks (SURMOUNT-1), 18.4% after lifestyle intervention (SURMOUNT-3), 17.5% in Chinese adults (SURMOUNT-CN), and 25.3% with continued treatment over 88 weeks (SURMOUNT-4). Meta-analyses confirmed higher odds of ≥5–20% weight loss versus semaglutide and liraglutide, significantly reducing body mass index, waist circumference, blood pressure, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. Health-related quality of life improved with greater weight loss, and gastrointestinal side effects (nausea, diarrhea, constipation) were common but mild to moderate, with <5% treatment discontinuation. Tirzepatide achieved significant weight loss, cardiometabolic benefits, and improved quality of life in non-diabetic obese individuals, but further research is needed on long-term efficacy, safety, and clinical application. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop