Next Article in Journal
The Relationship Between Psychophysiological and Psychological Parameters of Job Stress and Working Capacity of Loggers During the Fly-In Period
Previous Article in Journal
Access to Orphan Medicinal Products in Bulgaria: An Analysis of the Positive Drug List and Individual Access Schemes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Five-Year Trends in SSRI Consumption: A Precision Medicine Approach to Comparative Analysis Between Serbia and European Countries
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Healthcare
Volume 13
Issue 18
10.3390/healthcare13182259
healthcare-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Real-World Safety Concerns of Tirzepatide: A Retrospective Analysis of FAERS Data (2022–2025)

by
Hadi A. Almansour
1,2,
Hilal A. Thaibah
1,2,
Moaddey Alfarhan
1,2,
Saeed A. Al-Qahtani
1,2,
Amani A. Khardali
1,2 and
Thamir M. Alshammari
1,2,*
1
Department of Clinical Practice, College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia
2
Pharmacy Practice Research Unit, College of Pharmacy, Jazan University, Jazan 45142, Saudi Arabia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Healthcare 2025, 13(18), 2259; https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182259
Submission received: 21 July 2025 / Revised: 24 August 2025 / Accepted: 6 September 2025 / Published: 9 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Technological Advances, Precision Medicine and Regulatory Improvements in Drug Safety and Pharmacy Support)
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

Background: Tirzepatide (Mounjaro or Zepbound), a dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonist, is approved for type 2 diabetes and weight management. Despite its efficacy, real-world safety data remain limited. This study analyzed post-marketing adverse events (AEs) associated with tirzepatide using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) to identify emerging safety concerns. Methods: FAERS reports from 2022 to Q1 2025 were analyzed. Disproportionality analyses (proportional reporting ratio [PRR], reporting odds ratio [ROR], empirical Bayes geometric mean [EBGM], and information component [IC]) were performed to detect safety signals. Reports were stratified by year, demographics, and AE type, focusing on cases in which tirzepatide was the primary suspect. Results: Among 65,974 reports, the majority originated from the U.S. (96%), with middle-aged females (40–59 years; 67%) most frequently affected. Incorrect dose administration was the top AE, increasing 8-fold from 1248 (2022) to 9800 (2024), with strong risk signals (ROR 22.15, 95% CI (20.75–23.65), and ROR 23.43, 95% CI (22.82–24.05), respectively, and PRR 16.80, 95% CI (15.74–17.93), and PRR 17.62, 95% CI (17.16–18.09), respectively). Other common AEs included injection-site reactions (e.g., pain [5273 cases in 2024]), gastrointestinal issues (nausea [3602 in 2024]), and off-label use. Class-related AEs (e.g., decreased appetite and blood glucose fluctuations) were also reported. Conclusions: Tirzepatide is associated with significant dosing errors, injection-site reactions, and gastrointestinal AEs in real-world use. The rising trend in reports underscores the need for enhanced provider and patient education, clearer dosing guidelines, and proactive monitoring. Further research is warranted to explore causative factors and optimize risk mitigation strategies.

1. Introduction

Tirzepatide (Mounjaro or Zepbound) is a medication used for managing type 2 diabetes, after it was approved by the FDA in May 2022, and, more recently (November 2023), for weight management [1,2]. It is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist used to regulate blood glucose levels [2]. Clinical trials have demonstrated that tirzepatide can lead to substantial weight loss in individuals with and without diabetes [3]. However, long-term safety data on it for this indication are still being collected [3,4]. There have been many social media advertisements and influencers promoting the use of tirzepatide for weight loss [5]. It has attracted attention both for its effectiveness and for possible side effects [5]. Thus, the safety of tirzepatide needs to be understood by healthcare providers and patients.
Medication errors remain a major concern in healthcare, affecting patient safety, treatment efficacy, and healthcare cost [6,7]. Since medication errors can cause avoidable adverse drug events (ADEs), it is important to know the factors that cause such medication errors to enhance patient safety [7]. Medication errors are possible at all phases of the medication therapy process, including prescribing, transcribing, dispensing, administering, and monitoring, and at all levels of these processes [8]. Such errors may result in ADEs, which are frequently avoidable. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) has worked to prevent these mistakes, with a principal focus on system-level changes in, as well to improve, hospitals [9]. In a systematic review, Assiri et al. (2018) defined the epidemiology of medication errors and types of common errors and risk factors at the level of the community-care environment [10]. It was indicated that there is a need for better reporting and monitoring of errors to better grasp the size of the problem.
There are reports of medication errors and safety concerns in the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. The FAERS is a system that aids the FDA’s post-marketing safety surveillance program for all marketed drugs and therapeutic biologic products [11]. It includes adverse event reports that are provided by manufacturers as required by regulation, in addition to reports provided directly by healthcare providers and consumers/patients. Using the FAERS data, investigators can identify and describe adverse events (AEs) unique to tirzepatide to build its safety profile in relation to other drugs sharing common side effect profiles.
Several studies have underlined the importance of discovering drug combinations that mitigate ADEs [12,13]. Since tirzepatide can potentially be used in combination with several adjunctive diabetes therapies, knowledge of possible drug interactions is relevant [12]. This could suggest that analysis of FAERS data on tirzepatide may provide insights into interactions that either worsen or mitigate ADEs [14] and, therefore, have implications for developing clinical guidelines for safer prescribing practices. Although there are barriers that may impact medication error reporting, the resolution of these barriers is critical for the appropriate characterization of the safety record of tirzepatide in the FAERS database, in turn, paving the way for more stringent policies to protect patients [15,16].
Pharmacological safety is an absolute concern in clinical settings. Various research studies describe the growing adoption of herbal medicines, and the issue of how adverse reactions are monitored demonstrates the need for strong methodologies to evaluate them [17]. This is consistent in many studies, which report a substantial prevalence of underreporting of AEs for novel drugs, such as tirzepatide [18]. Development of integrated surveillance systems is urgent, and especially relevant for drugs with new mechanisms of action like tirzepatide. Thus, the aim of this study is to provide an overview of the safety profile of tirzepatide, including medication errors, ADEs, and other safety issues using the FAERS database.

2. Methods

The study utilized data from the FAERS, covering reports from 2022 to 2025. Reports are submitted by various sources globally, including healthcare professionals, pharmaceutical manufacturers, lawyers, and patients. This database is freely accessible on the FDA’s website and is updated every three months [19]. The FAERS database is structured into the following seven distinct file types: Demographic and Administrative Information (DEMO), Adverse Events (REAC), Patient Outcomes (OUTC), Report Sources (RPSR), Drug Information (DRUG), Indications for Use (INDI), and Start and End Dates for Reported Drugs (THER). These sub-databases are classified based on the reporter type, including consumers, physicians, pharmacists, other healthcare professionals, or lawyers. Reported patient outcomes include death, hospitalization, disability, or other unspecified outcomes, all of which require intervention to be prevented. The country of the reporters indicates the basis of the latest report version, which can be inside or outside the U.S. Patient age is recorded numerically at the time of the event [19,20]. To link all datasets for the study, a unique identifier called “primaryid” was used. It is important to note that the U.S. FDA requires pharmaceutical manufacturers to report adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for their products. Consumers/patients and healthcare professionals are also recommended to submit ADR reports, despite their location [21,22].
The data retrieved from the FAERS for this study, from 2022 to the first quarter of 2025, are meant to demonstrate the safety concerns of tirzepatide use. The FAERS database uses the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities’ (MedDRA) coding system, which employs preferred terms (PTs) to categorize AEs. The study was conducted in two phases to (1) find all AEs related to the drug of interest and (2) perform a disproportionality analysis on the most reported AEs. Reports were retrieved using the “drugname” and “prod_ai” variables. To minimize bias from other medications, only reports where tirzepatide was listed as the primary suspected (PS) cause of the adverse event were included. In addition, duplicate reports were identified and removed using the “primaryid”, event date (event_dt), and “pt” variables.
A non-case disproportionate/pharmacovigilance case analysis was performed to assess the risk of the most reported AEs linked to tirzepatide. In this analysis, “cases” were defined as potential AE reports associated with tirzepatide, while “non-cases” included all other AE reports for tirzepatide.
Both Bayesian and traditional statistical methods were used to evaluate possible safety concerns. A 2 × 2 contingency table was utilized to analyze the following four key metrics: “a” (cases for the studied medication), “b” (non-cases for the studied medication), “c” (cases for other medications), and “d” (non-cases for other medications) (Table 1). A dual-method approach was used to improve the reliability of the analysis and decrease the chance of inaccurate results. The disproportionality metrics calculated included the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), reporting odds ratio (ROR), information component (IC), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM). A safety signal was indicated if the results met specific criteria across the following metrics: an ROR above one, a PRR of two or higher, an EBGM exceeding two, or an IC value greater than zero [22,23].
To ensure reliability and minimize false associations, significant signals were required to meet the criteria for all four metrics. All statistical analyses were conducted using R software (version 4.2.2) and R Studio (version 2024.04.2+764).

3. Results

A total of 65,974 tirzepatide reports were retrieved from the U.S. FAERS database (Table 2). The majority of reports were submitted by females (44,120; 66.9%), followed by males (13,410; 20.3%), while 8444 (12.8%) were by an unspecified sex. Regarding age, the highest number of reports came from individuals aged 40 to 59 years (21,809; 33.1%), followed by those aged 60 to 89 years (12,943; 19.6%) and those aged 18 to 39 years (7519; 11.4%). Reports involving children under 18 were infrequent (16; 0.02%). Notably, 23,666 reports (35.9%) did not specify age.
Regarding reporter types, consumers (61,838; 93.7%) were the predominant source of reports. Among healthcare professionals, medical doctors submitted 1110 (1.7%) reports, pharmacists submitted 691 (1.0%), and other healthcare professionals contributed 2062 (3.1%). A smaller portion of reports originated from lawyers (222; 0.3%), and 51 (0.1%) were from other or unknown sources.
The most frequently reported outcomes were categorized as unknown (59,171; 89.7%). Among the known outcomes, hospitalization (2418; 3.7%) was the most common, followed by other outcomes (3983; 6.0%), death (221; 0.3%), and disability (181; 0.3%).
Geographically, the majority of reports came from the United States (63,664; 96.5%), followed by the United Kingdom (1187; 1.8%), Japan (522; 0.8%), and other countries (601; 0.9%).
Report submissions increased significantly over time, with 4931 (7.5%) in 2022; 20,600 (31.2%) in 2023; 37,854 (57.4%) in 2024; and 2589 (3.9%) in the first quarter of 2025.
Table 3 shows a significant increase in the AE reports linked to tirzepatide from 2022 to the first quarter of 2025, particularly related to incorrect dose administration. The AE reports surged from 4931 (2022) to 37,854 (2024). Furthermore, the risk signals remained high, i.e., reporting odds ratio (ROR), as it consistently increased (22.15–27.31), peaking in 2023. Also, proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) were similarly high (16.80–19.87), indicating a strong association. However, EBGM and IC slightly declined in 2024 but still signaled significant risk.

3.1. Most Reported Adverse Events (Consistently Top 5)

Reviewing individual adverse events from 2022 to Q1 2025 showed that “Incorrect Dose Administered” was the most common, with 19,461 reports (Table 4). This event type saw a significant increase over the years, rising from 1248 in 2022 to 9800 in 2024, as well as adding 2589 more reports in Q1 2025. “Injection-site Pain” was the second most reported event, with 9849 reports. This adverse event saw a steady increase each year, reaching its peak at 5273 reports in 2024. Nausea ranked third, with 7678 reports from 2022 to Q1 2025. It remained a consistent gastrointestinal complaint, increasing from 655 in 2022 to 3602 in 2024. The fourth most reported event was “Off-label Use”, with 6993 total reports, which peaked in 2023 (3162 reports). The fifth was “Extra Dose Administered”, which accounted for 5044 reports. This event also showed a sharp increase from 283 in 2022 to 2984 reports in 2024.

3.2. Class-Effective AEs

Some AEs might be related to the class of the GLP-1/GIP agonists including decreased appetite and weight loss. Also, blood glucose fluctuations were reported in 2023–2024 and may reflect variability in glycemic control in some patients.
As part of our effort to categorize adverse events, we grouped them into the following four main categories: dosing errors, injection-site reactions, gastrointestinal (GI) events, and other adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The most common category was dosing errors, with a total of 30,075 reports during the study period. Dosing errors included incorrect doses, extra doses, accidental underdoses, missed doses, and improper schedules for product administration. There was a significant year-over-year increase in this category, rising from 1715 in 2022 to 15,887 in 2024 and 4241 in Q1 2025 (Figure 1).
Injection-site reactions included 19,334 reports, the second most common category. These reactions included injection-site pain, bleeding, redness, and bruising, with the most reports coming in at 10,245 in 2024.
Gastrointestinal (GI) events, including nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, decreased appetite, and abdominal pain, resulted in a total of 18,018 reports. These events increased consistently over the years, rising from 1423 in 2022 to 8133 in 2024, with 2771 already recorded in Q1 2025.
Other adverse reactions to tirzepatide included off-label use, fatigue, headache, weight loss, and increased blood sugar, totaling 9995 reports. Although this category was the least common overall, it experienced a steady increase from 1153 reports in 2022 to 4532 in 2024.

4. Discussion

This study reveals several critical insights into the safety profile and real-world use of tirzepatide. The data highlight a significant increase in reported ADEs from 2022 to 2025, with incorrect dose administration emerging as the most prominent issue. This trend aligns with the growing use of tirzepatide, particularly in the United States, which accounted for 96% of the country-specified reports. While there was a study that focused on the AE reports for tirzepatide in the U.S. FAERS database for the period of 2022–2023 [24], our study explored such reported AEs from 2022 through to the first quarter of 2025, providing a more comprehensive view covering the overall safety profile of this medication. The demographics indicate that females were the most frequent reporters, suggesting a potential sex difference (67% female), which aligns with the previous literature showing that females report more ADEs than males [25,26]. Given that tirzepatide is approved by the FDA for the management of type 2 diabetes and obesity, the predominance of reports originating from individuals aged 40–59 years is likely attributable to the high burden of these chronic conditions within this age group [27,28]. However, it is important to note that, as is the nature of the database, there are reports that do not include age information, which limits the detail of age-specific analyses—a common issue in spontaneous reporting systems. One notable trend was the high number of reports submitted by consumers, which accounted for 93.7%. This indicates that there is awareness among consumers/patients about the adverse events that they experienced or the errors that occurred during the usage of the products. Also, since these errors are related to administration, consumers are the most accurate population to describe these events. Moreover, we acknowledge the issue of underreporting by healthcare professionals, especially pharmacists and physicians. Therefore, there is a need to encourage more active reporting from physicians and pharmacists to improve the clinical validity of pharmacovigilance data and support earlier signal detection.
The high number of U.S.-origin reports (96.5%) indicates a regional imbalance that can skew global safety signal detection. This highlights the need for more balanced international participation in pharmacovigilance systems [20,21]. There was a significant increase in report submissions over time, jumping from 5462 in 2022 to 23,497 in 2023, 38,797 in 2024, and 9666 in the first quarter of 2025. The growth in AE reports from 2022 to 2024 could be due to a greater awareness of drug safety, more widespread use of newer medications like tirzepatide, and easier online reporting systems.
In previously published research, there were no reported dose-dependent ADEs [24]. However, the surge in ADEs reported in our study, especially incorrect dose administration, is concerning. The nearly 8-fold increase in such reports from 2022 to 2024 underscores the challenges in prescribing and administering tirzepatide. The consistently elevated risk signals, as evidenced by the high ROR and PRR, further emphasize the strong association between tirzepatide and dosing errors. Although the EBGM and IC showed slight declines in 2024, they remained significant, indicating ongoing safety concerns. The nature and frequency of dosing errors—such as double-dosing, missed doses, or incorrect titration—with tirzepatide mirror those documented for semaglutide and dulaglutide. These errors are primarily attributable to the following two class-wide features: the once-weekly administration schedule, which can cause patients to lose track of their injection day, and the mandatory dose-escalation protocols designed to improve gastrointestinal tolerability [29]. For instance, tirzepatide’s titration from 2.5 mg up to 15 mg is analogous in complexity to semaglutide’s escalation from 0.25 mg to 2.0 mg. There is no evidence to suggest that tirzepatide’s pre-filled pen device, which is similar to that of dulaglutide, or its formulation contributes to a higher rate of user error compared to other agents in the class [30]. Such safety concerns, especially for dose-dependent ADEs of tirzepatide, could lead to severe gastrointestinal AEs, as evident by related clinical trials [31]. These findings suggest a need for enhanced education and training for healthcare providers (e.g., prescribers, pharmacists, and nurses) and patients to mitigate dosing errors and improve medication safety. Such strategies could also mitigate injection-site issues and help such medication users. As the American Diabetes Association has issued practical guidelines for GLP-1 medications’ administration [32], it would be better for clinicians to update their knowledge and educate their patients based on these guidelines to minimize such ADEs.
Injection-site reactions were also among the top reported AEs, with injection-site pain particularly prevalent. These events are consistent with the known side effects of GLP-1/GIP agonists, the class to which tirzepatide belongs [33]. Injection-site reactions, such as erythema, pruritus, and swelling, were reported at a low and consistent frequency across the tirzepatide SURPASS clinical trials, occurring in approximately ≤1–2% of participants [34]. This incidence is directly comparable to the rates observed with other established GLP-1 RAs, including approximately 1% with semaglutide in the SUSTAIN program and 1–2% with dulaglutide in the AWARD trials [30]. These events are typically mild and transient in nature. Their similar prevalence across different molecules indicates they are a consequence of the subcutaneous administration of peptide-based therapies rather than a specific issue related to tirzepatide’s dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and GLP-1 receptor agonism [29]. These events have persisted over the years, underscoring the importance of proactive management strategies. Providing patient counseling on injection techniques, along with standardized training and clear guidance, can help minimize discomfort, improve tolerability, and boost adherence in long-term injectable therapies.
The third major category was gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events. This is particularly relevant to tirzepatide, as clinical trials (e.g., SURPASS and SURMOUNT studies) and post-marketing surveillance have consistently reported nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and constipation as the most frequent adverse effects [35]. These symptoms, although often transient, may lead to discontinuation of treatment or dose interruption [36]. A 2024 pharmacovigilance study noted a dose-dependent increase in GI adverse events among tirzepatide users, especially during the initiation and titration phases [37]. These GI adverse events are similar to GLP-1 agonists [33]. Therefore, such surveillance studies are crucial for identifying any major safety concerns with tirzepatide or similar medications as soon as possible. By proactively managing GI side effects through strategies such as dose adjustments, dietary changes, and anti-nausea medication, healthcare providers can help prevent patients treated with tirzepatide from having to discontinue treatment.
The other ADRs category, including fatigue, headache, weight changes, and blood glucose abnormalities, totaled 9995 reports in the EudraVigilance database [38]. The introduction of new AEs, such as blood glucose fluctuations from 2022 to 2024, suggests evolving patterns in tirzepatide use and associated risks [38]. The class-effective adverse events align with the pharmacodynamic effects of tirzepatide. However, the reports of blood glucose variability in some patients indicate the need for careful monitoring, particularly in individuals with diabetes, to ensure optimal glycemic control [35]. These results may reflect broader trends in prescribing practices or challenges in patient adherence and warrant further investigation. Regulatory bodies and institutions should track off-label prescribing patterns, particularly with newer agents like tirzepatide, to ensure appropriate patient selection and risk–benefit analysis.

Limitations

Like most spontaneous reporting systems, this study has several limitations, including underreporting, a lack of denominator data, and missing clinical details, which impact the interpretation of the findings. A large number of reports were missing key demographic and clinical information, as follows: age was unknown in 35.9%, sex was not reported in 12.8%, and clinical outcomes were missing in 89.7% of reports. These gaps may limit the ability to conduct in-depth analyses, estimate incidence rates, or draw firm conclusions about causality and severity. Furthermore, the data show a strong geographic concentration, with 96.5% of reports coming from the United States. This regional bias may limit the applicability of the findings and could mask potential safety signals in other populations or healthcare systems. Additionally, causality cannot be deduced from the FAERS data, and duplicated or incomplete reports might affect signal strength. Due to the spontaneous nature of the FAERS reports, the causality between tirzepatide and the reported adverse events cannot be established. The data reflect associations that may suggest a potential safety signal but do not confirm direct cause–effect relationships. Therefore, future research might be needed to explore the underlying causes of these AEs and evaluate the effectiveness of mitigation strategies in real-world settings. Furthermore, qualitative research investigating the underlying reasons and factors that may lead to such safety concerns from users’ and healthcare providers’ perspectives may be essential to reduce these concerns for these medications or similar ones.

5. Conclusions

Tirzepatide’s increasing use in the management of diabetes and obesity is reflected in emerging pharmacovigilance trends. The findings underscore the importance of vigilant monitoring and targeted interventions to address the safety concerns associated with tirzepatide, particularly dosing errors and injection-site reactions. Healthcare providers should prioritize patient education, clear dosing instructions, and regular follow-ups to minimize risks.

Author Contributions

H.A.A. and T.M.A.: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, writing—original draft, and writing—review and editing. H.A.T., A.A.K., M.A. and S.A.A.-Q.: writing—original draft and writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study did not involve human subjects or animal experimentation. The data used in this research were obtained from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), which is a publicly accessible database containing de-identified post-marketing safety reports submitted by consumers, healthcare professionals, and pharmaceutical companies. As such, this retrospective analysis involves secondary data analysis of anonymous, publicly available data and does not meet the regulatory definition of human subject research under the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations (45 CFR 46). Therefore, approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) is not applicable, and a waiver is hereby requested.

Informed Consent Statement

Similarly, this study did not involve the collection, use, or analysis of identifiable private information. The FAERS database contains no personally identifiable information (PII), and all analyses were conducted in aggregate. In accordance with ethical guidelines and data protection laws, including the Declaration of Helsinki and global best practices for retrospective secondary data analysis, the requirement for informed consent is deemed not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) quarterly data extract files are publicly available and can be obtained at the following: https://fis.fda.gov/extensions/FPD-QDE-FAERS/FPD-QDE-FAERS.html (accessed on 5 April 2025).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Garvey, W.T.; Frias, J.P.; Jastreboff, A.M.; le Roux, C.W.; Sattar, N.; Aizenberg, D.; Mao, H.; Zhang, S.; Ahmad, N.N.; Bunck, M.C.; et al. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity in people with type 2 diabetes (SURMOUNT-2): A double-blind, randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2023, 402, 613–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chavda, V.P.; Ajabiya, J.; Teli, D.; Bojarska, J.; Apostolopoulos, V. Tirzepatide, a new era of dual-targeted treatment for diabetes and obesity: A mini-review. Molecules 2022, 27, 4315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moiz, A.; Khan, T.; Masood, Q.; Malik, B.H. Efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight loss among adults without diabetes: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Ann. Intern. Med. 2025, 178, 199–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Zupec, J.; Munger, R.; Scaletta, A.; Quinn, D.H. Use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and incretin mimetics for type 2 diabetes and obesity: A narrative review. Nutr. Clin. Pract. 2025, 40, 327–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Febrey, S.; Jones, L.; Jones, D.; Hicks, K. What are the experiences, views and perceptions of patients, carers and clinicians of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs)? A scoping review. Health Expect. 2025, 28, e70251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Ruder, K. Patients are flocking to compounded weight-loss drugs, but are they safe? JAMA 2025, 333, 652–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Takyi, A.K.; Gaffey, R.H.; Shukla, A.P. Optimizing the efficacy of anti-obesity medications: A practical guide to personalizing incretin-based therapies. Curr. Treat. Options Gastroenterol. 2025, 23, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ntani, S.N.; Sangha, Y.M.N. Prevalence and causes of medication transcription errors among hospitalized patients: An observational study and survey of nurses at a faith-based hospital in Cameroon. Glob. Health Econ. Sustain. 2024, 2, 2457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Vest, T.A.; Gazda, N.P.; O’Neil, D.P.; Eckel, S.F. Practice-enhancing publications about the medication-use process in 2021. Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm. 2024, 81, e489–e519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Assiri, G.A.; Shebl, N.A.; Mahmoud, M.A.; Aloudah, N.; Grant, E.; Aljadhey, H.; Sheikh, A. What is the epidemiology of medication errors, error-related adverse events and risk factors for errors in adults managed in community care contexts? A systematic review of the international literature. BMJ Open 2018, 8, e019101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. George, J.; Dsouza, P.L.; Jahnavi, Y.; Singh, H.; Kumar, P.A. Databases and tools for signal detection of drugs in post-marketing surveillance. In Signal Analysis in Pharmacovigilance; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2024; pp. 32–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Christaki, E.; Protopapa, C.; Siamidi, A.; Vlachou, M. Obesity management: An update on the available pharmacotherapy. Innov. Med. Omics 2025, 2, 8316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lupianez-Merly, C.; Dilmaghani, S.; Vosoughi, K.; Camilleri, M. Review article: Pharmacologic management of obesity—Updates on approved medications, indications and risks. Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. 2024, 59, 475–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Abi Zeid Daou, C.; Aboul Hosn, O.; Ghzayel, L.; Mourad, M. Exploring connections between weight-loss medications and thyroid cancer: A look at the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. Endocrinol. Diabetes Metab. 2025, 8, e70038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. McIntyre, R.S.; Kwan, A.T.H. Increased reporting of accidental overdose with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: A population-based study. In Expert Opinion on Drug Safety; 2024. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39552465/ (accessed on 5 September 2025). [CrossRef]
  16. Chiappini, S.; Guirguis, A.; John, A.; Corkery, J.M.; Schifano, F. Is there a risk for semaglutide misuse? Focus on the Food and Drug Administration’s FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) pharmacovigilance dataset. Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16, 994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Barnes, J. Advances in methods and techniques in pharmacovigilance for herbal and traditional medicines and other natural health products. In Pharmacovigilance for Herbal and Traditional Medicines: Advances, Challenges and International Perspectives; 2022; pp. 93–139. Available online: https://www.scribd.com/document/766337469/Joanne-Barnes-Pharmacovigilance-for-Herbal-and-Traditional-Medicines-Advances-Challenges-and-International-Perspectives-Adis-2022 (accessed on 5 September 2025). [CrossRef]
  18. Chen, W.; Cai, P.; Zou, W.; Fu, Z. Psychiatric adverse events associated with GLP-1 receptor agonists: A real-world pharmacovigilance study based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. Front. Endocrinol. 2024, 15, 1330936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. FAERS Quarterly Data Extract Files [Internet]. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Available online: https://fis.fda.gov/extensions/FPD-QDE-FAERS/FPD-QDE-FAERS.html (accessed on 4 June 2025).
  20. Alenzi, K.A.; Alsuhaibani, D.; Batarfi, B.; Alshammari, T.M. Pancreatitis with use of new diabetic medications: A real-world data study using the post-marketing FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1364110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Alshammari, T.M.; Ata, S.I.; Mahmoud, M.A.; Alhawassi, T.M.; Aljadhey, H.S. Signals of bleeding among direct-acting oral anticoagulant users compared to those among warfarin users: Analyses of the post-marketing FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, 2010–2015. Ther. Clin. Risk Manag. 2018, 14, 803–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Altebainawi, A.F.; Alfaraj, L.A.; Alharbi, A.A.; Alkhuraisi, F.F.; Alshammari, T.M. Association between proton pump inhibitors and rhabdomyolysis risk: A post-marketing surveillance using FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database. Ther. Adv. Drug Saf. 2023, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Thaibah, H.A.; Banji, O.J.F.; Banji, D.; Alshammari, T.M. Diabetic ketoacidosis and the use of new hypoglycemic groups: Real-world evidence utilizing the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chen, H.; Ding, Y.; Shan, Y. Post-marketing safety monitoring of tirzepatide: A pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database. Expert Opin. Drug Saf. 2025, 8, 959–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zopf, Y.; Rabe, C.; Neubert, A.; Gassmann, K.G.; Rascher, W.; Hahn, E.G.; Brune, K.; Dormann, H. Women encounter ADRs more often than do men. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2008, 64, 999–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Watson, S.; Caster, O.; Rochon, P.A.; den Ruijter, H. Reported adverse drug reactions in women and men: Aggregated evidence from globally collected individual case reports during half a century. EClinicalMedicine 2019, 17, 100188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Adult Obesity Prevalence Maps [Internet]. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data-and-statistics/adult-obesity-prevalence-maps.html (accessed on 1 June 2025).
  28. Goyal, R.; Singhal, M.; Jialal, I. Type 2 Diabetes [Internet]. StatPearls, 2023. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK513253/ (accessed on 1 June 2025).
  29. Farzam, K.; Patel, P. Tirzepatide. In StatPearls [Internet]; StatPearls Publishing: St. Petersburg, FL, USA, 2024. [Google Scholar]
  30. Karagiannis, T.; Malandris, K.; Avgerinos, I.; Stamati, A.; Kakotrichi, P.; Liakos, A.; Vasilakou, D.; Kakaletsis, N.; Tsapas, A.; Bekiari, E. Subcutaneously administered tirzepatide vs. semaglutide for adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Diabetologia 2024, 67, 1206–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yao, H.; Liu, J.; Zhang, R.; Li, R.; Wang, Y.; Sun, X.; Yuan, C.S. Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists on glycaemic control, body weight, and lipid profile for type 2 diabetes: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 2024, 384, e076410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee. 7. Diabetes Technology: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2024. Diabetes Care 2024, 47 (Suppl. 1), S126–S144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Filippatos, T.D.; Panagiotopoulou, T.V.; Elisaf, M.S. Adverse effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists. Rev. Diabet. Stud. 2015, 11, 202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Karagiannis, T.; Avgerinos, I.; Liakos, A.; Del Prato, S.; Matthews, D.R.; Tsapas, A.; Bekiari, E. Management of type 2 diabetes with the dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist tirzepatide: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 2022, 65, 1251–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liu, L. A real-world data analysis of tirzepatide in the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database. Front. Pharmacol. 2024, 15, 1397029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jastreboff, A.M.; Aronne, L.J.; Ahmad, N.N.; Wharton, S.; Connery, L.; Alves, B.; Kiyosue, A.; Zhang, S.; Liu, B.; Bunck, M.C.; et al. Tirzepatide once weekly for the treatment of obesity. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 387, 205–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Caruso, I.; Cari, L.; Berardicurti, O.; Di Nisio, C.; Di Michele, L.; Di Giovanni, P.; Laviola, L.; Giorgino, F. The real-world safety profile of tirzepatide: Pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2024, 47, 2671–2678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Khurana, A.; Kaur, R.; Sharma, S.; Singh, G.; Kapoor, D. Safety profile of tirzepatide: A real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of EudraVigilance database. Clin. Epidemiol. Glob. Health 2024, 30, 101805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Healthcare 13 02259 g001
Figure 1. Trends in adverse event categories (2022—Q1 2025).
Figure 1. Trends in adverse event categories (2022—Q1 2025).
Healthcare 13 02259 g001
Table 1. Contingency table for disproportionality analyses.
Table 1. Contingency table for disproportionality analyses.
Adverse Drug Reaction of InterestOther Adverse Drug Reactions
Drug of interestab
All other drugs in the databasecd
Table 2. Demographics of tirzepatide adverse event reports.
Table 2. Demographics of tirzepatide adverse event reports.
CharacteristicCategoryNumber of Reports (%)
SexFemale (F)44,120 (66.9)
Male (M)13,410 (20.3)
Unknown (UNK)8444 (12.8)
Age(<18 years)16 (0.02)
(18–39 years)7519 (11.4)
(40–59 years)21,809 (33.1)
(60–89 years)12,943 (19.6)
(≥90 years)21 (0.04)
Unknown (UNK)23,666 (35.9)
Reporter
Type		Healthcare Professional (HP)2062 (3.1)
Medical Doctor (MD)1110 (1.7)
Pharmacist (PH)691 (1.0)
Consumer (CN)61,838 (93.7)
Lawyer (LW)222 (0.3)
Other/Unknown51 (0.1)
OutcomeDeath (DE)221 (0.3)
Hospitalization (HO)2418 (3.7)
Disability (DS)181 (0.3)
Other (OT)3983 (6.0)
Unknown (UNK)59,171 (89.7)
Reporting CountryUnited States (US)63,664 (96.5)
United Kingdom (GB)1187 (1.8)
Japan (JP)522 (0.8)
Others (20+ countries)601 (0.9)
Reporting Year20224931 (7.5)
202320,600 (31.2)
202437,854 (57.4)
Q1 2025 2589 (3.9)
Table 3. Risk of incorrect dose administered and the use of tirzepatide during 2022 to Q1 2025.
Table 3. Risk of incorrect dose administered and the use of tirzepatide during 2022 to Q1 2025.
YearNumber of Incorrect Dose Administration ADEsReported ADEs for the Drug of InterestROR
(95% CI)		PRR
(95% CI)		EBGMIC
20221248493122.15
(20.75–23.65)		16.80
(15.74–17.93)		16.014.00
2023582420,60027.31
(26.43–28.23)		19.87
(19.23–20.54)		16.104.00
2024980037,85423.43
(22.82–24.05)		17.62
(17.16–18.09)		12.683.66
Q1 2025258911,20617.61
(16.75–18.52)		13.78
(13.10–14.49)		10.133.34
Table 4. The most frequent adverse event signals associated with tirzepatide between 2022 and Q1 2025.
Table 4. The most frequent adverse event signals associated with tirzepatide between 2022 and Q1 2025.
Adverse Event202220232024Q1 2025Total
Incorrect dose administered124858249800258919,461
Injection-site pain5922946527310389849
Nausea6552390360210317678
Off-label use748316227043796993
Extra dose administered283107829846995044
Injection-site hemorrhage289134420563704059
Diarrhea286105617876193748
Injection-site erythema15398717473763263
Vomiting26888515735153241
Accidental underdose——19814852466
Constipation—70311713702244
Product dose omission issue—59311224682183
Injection-site bruising13758811692692163
Blood glucose increased—5471019—1566
Fatigue111—8092221142
Inappropriate schedule of product administration184737——921
Decreased appetite214657——871
Abdominal pain upper———236236
Weight decreased192———192
Headache102———102
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Almansour, H.A.; Thaibah, H.A.; Alfarhan, M.; Al-Qahtani, S.A.; Khardali, A.A.; Alshammari, T.M. Real-World Safety Concerns of Tirzepatide: A Retrospective Analysis of FAERS Data (2022–2025). Healthcare 2025, 13, 2259. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182259

AMA Style

Almansour HA, Thaibah HA, Alfarhan M, Al-Qahtani SA, Khardali AA, Alshammari TM. Real-World Safety Concerns of Tirzepatide: A Retrospective Analysis of FAERS Data (2022–2025). Healthcare. 2025; 13(18):2259. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182259

Chicago/Turabian Style

Almansour, Hadi A., Hilal A. Thaibah, Moaddey Alfarhan, Saeed A. Al-Qahtani, Amani A. Khardali, and Thamir M. Alshammari. 2025. "Real-World Safety Concerns of Tirzepatide: A Retrospective Analysis of FAERS Data (2022–2025)" Healthcare 13, no. 18: 2259. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182259

APA Style

Almansour, H. A., Thaibah, H. A., Alfarhan, M., Al-Qahtani, S. A., Khardali, A. A., & Alshammari, T. M. (2025). Real-World Safety Concerns of Tirzepatide: A Retrospective Analysis of FAERS Data (2022–2025). Healthcare, 13(18), 2259. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182259

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop