Search Results (41)

The incorporation of nucleoside analogs into DNA by polymerases, followed by their removal through base excision repair (BER), represents a promising strategy for cancer chemotherapy. In this study, we investigated the incorporation and cytotoxic effects of several nucleoside analogs—some of which are epigenetic reprogramming intermediates—in the U87 glioblastoma cell line. We found that two analogs, 5-hydroxymethyl-2′-deoxyuridine (5HmdU) and trifluorothymidine (TFT), are both cytotoxic and are efficiently incorporated into genomic DNA. In contrast, the 5-carboxy analogs—5-carboxy-2′-deoxyuridine (5CadU) and 5-carboxycytidine (5CadC)—showed no cytotoxicity and were not incorporated into DNA. Interestingly, 5-hydroxymethyl-2′-deoxycytidine (5HmdC) was cytotoxic but was not directly incorporated into DNA. Instead, it was deaminated into 5HmdU, which was then incorporated and likely responsible for the observed toxicity. 5HmdU is actively removed from DNA through the BER pathways. In contrast, TFT remains stably incorporated and is neither excised by BER nor does it hydrolyze into 5CadU—a known substrate for the DNA glycosylase SMUG1. We also found that N⁶-benzyladenosine (BzAdo), an inhibitor of the enzyme 2′-deoxynucleoside 5′-phosphate N-hydrolase (DNPH1), enhances the cytotoxicity of 5HmdU. However, the thymidine phosphorylase inhibitor tipiracil hydrochloride (TPI) does not increase the cytotoxic effect of TFT in U87 cells. Together, these findings highlight 5HmdU and TFT as promising chemotherapeutic agents for glioblastoma, each with distinct mechanisms of action and cellular processing. Full article

Background: Regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) are approved treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in refractory cases. However, the optimal sequencing of these agents is unknown. The ReTrITA study planned to assess the real-world efficacy of R and T, administered either sequentially or as monotherapy, in a large Italian multicentre population. Methods: This retrospective observational analysis comprised 1156 mCRC patients treated between 2012 and 2023 at 17 Italian cancer centres. Patients were divided into four groups: sequential T/R (n = 261), sequential R/T (n = 155), R monotherapy (n = 313), and T monotherapy (n = 427). The primary objectives were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary goals being disease control rate, objective response rate, and treatment-related toxicity. Results: The monotherapy cohorts showed no significant difference in OS (R: 5.0 months; T: 5.9 months; p = 0.8371) or PFS (R: 3.2 months; T: 3.3 months; p = 0.6531). Compared to T/R, the sequential R/T group had significantly better outcomes: median OS was 16.6 vs. 12.6 months (HR = 0.67; p = 0.0004), and median PFS was 11.5 vs. 8.5 months (HR = 0.60; p < 0.0001). The survival advantage of R/T was consistent across clinical subgroups. The toxicity profiles were comparable with known safety data, with a lower prevalence of neutropenia reported in the R/T sequence. Conclusions: ReTrITA confirms the efficacy of R and T as monotherapies and provides compelling real-world evidence that the R/T sequence improves survival in refractory mCRC. These findings support a regorafenib-first approach in patients who are eligible, and they emphasise the need for future research into combination strategies and comparisons with newer drugs such as fruquintinib. Full article

Background/Objectives: Patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who are refractory to standard chemotherapy face limited treatment options. While trifluridine–tipiracil (FTD–TPI) and regorafenib have shown modest efficacy in prior clinical trials, recent data from the SUNLIGHT trial demonstrated that combining FTD–TPI with bevacizumab (FTD–TPI+BEV) may improve overall survival compared to FTD–TPI alone. However, supporting evidence from real-world populations remains scarce. Methods: This retrospective study assessed the real-world effectiveness and safety of FTD–TPI+BEV versus FTD–TPI monotherapy in patients with refractory mCRC treated at two institutions from June 2020 to October 2024. Results: A total of 106 patients were included, with 47 treated with FTD–TPI+BEV and 59 with FTD–TPI alone. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer with FTD–TPI+BEV compared to FTD–TPI alone (4.1 vs. 2.1 months; HR = 0.56; p = 0.004), while median overall survival showed a non-significant trend favoring FTD–TPI+BEV (8.4 vs. 6.3 months; HR = 0.74; p = 0.189). The disease control rate was also significantly higher with FTD–TPI+BEV (59.6% vs. 25.4%, p = 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed consistent PFS benefits. Grade 3–5 adverse events occurred at comparable rates between groups. Conclusions: FTD–TPI+BEV may represent a preferred salvage treatment option for refractory mCRC. Full article

Background: Regorafenib (R) and Trifluridine/Tipiracil ± bevacizumab (T) are approved for treating refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) but their optimal sequence is unclear. This study describes the characteristics/clinical outcomes of patients with mCRC in U.S. clinical practice treated sequentially with R-T or T-R. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of 818 patients treated with R-T or T-R between January 2015 and November 2022 was conducted using an electronic health record-derived database. The primary objective was to describe the demographic/clinical characteristics and biomarker status of patients treated with R-T or T-R, stratified by treatment line/age. Secondary objectives were to evaluate/estimate the frequency of neutropenia and myelosuppression-related treatments, the number/type of subsequent therapies, time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), and overall survival (OS). Results: Baseline characteristics were similar among patients who received R-T (n = 393) or T-R (n = 425). Lower rates of moderate/severe neutropenia (26%/12% vs. 32%/16%) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor/erythropoietin use (22% vs. 24%) were observed with R-T versus T-R. The median TTD was 8.7 months and 8.5 months with R-T versus 8.1 months and 7.9 months with T-R as third- and fourth-line treatment, respectively. The median OS was 13.1 months and 11.6 months with R-T versus 11.5 months and 10.3 months with T-R as third- and fourth-line treatment, respectively. Conclusions: This study did not show a statistically significant difference in OS with R-T versus T-R. Although limited by its retrospective nature, the study suggested R-T may be preferable to T-R given the observed reduction in neutropenia/myelosuppression-related treatments. Full article

The treatment landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has undergone significant evolution, with the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy dramatically altering the management of microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. However, the majority of patients, particularly those with microsatellite-stable (MSS) disease, remain refractory to immunotherapy, necessitating the exploration of alternative therapeutic strategies. This review summarizes the current treatment options for heavily pretreated mCRC patients who are not eligible for targeted therapies or clinical trials. Approved therapies for refractory mCRC, including regorafenib, trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI), and fruquintinib, demonstrate modest survival benefits but are often associated with significant toxicities. Additionally, innovative approaches targeting specific mutations such as KRAS G12C, HER2 amplification, and BRAF V600E are discussed, highlighting emerging combination regimens with immune checkpoint inhibitors and other agents to overcome resistance mechanisms. The potential of rechallenge strategies using previously administered therapies, such as oxaliplatin and anti-EGFR agents, is examined, supported by retrospective and prospective studies. Furthermore, the role of older drugs like mitomycin C in combination with capecitabine is revisited, offering insights into their viability in advanced treatment settings. Ongoing clinical trials with novel agents and combinations are expected to provide further clarity on optimizing sequential treatment regimens and personalizing therapy for mCRC patients. This review emphasizes the need for comprehensive molecular profiling and shared decision-making to improve outcomes and quality of life in this challenging patient population. Full article

Background: For patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD–TPI) has been associated with a significant improvement in overall survival (OS). However, data are lacking regarding the activity of FTD–TPI in patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter, international cohort included patients with BRAF-mutated mCRC treated with FTD–TPI in a real-life setting in Spain and Italy. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier methods and Cox proportional hazard models and according to established prognostic groups: good prognosis characteristics (GPC; < 3 metastatic sites and time from metastases to FTD–TPI ≥ 18 months) and poor prognosis characteristics (PPC; ≥ 3 metastatic sites or time from metastases to FTD–TPI < 18 months). Results: In the 26 patients included, the median age was 61 years, 13 (50%) were female, and 20 (77%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1. Fourteen (56%) patients had right-sided tumors, six (23%) had microsatellite instability tumors, and thirteen (50%) had liver metastases. Median progression-free survival was 2.3 months (95% CI 2.0–3.2), and median OS (mOS) was 6.6 months (95% CI 4.4–12.0). mOS was 7.6 vs. 4.2 months (HR 1.64, 95% CI 0.65–4.10, p = 0.3) for GPC and PPC patients, respectively. Exploratory analyses identified ECOG as the only feature associated with survival. The most frequent grade 3–4 adverse events were neutropenia (8%), anemia (8%), and asthenia (4%). Conclusions: Patients with BRAF mutant mCRC achieved modest benefits with FTD–TPI; however, patients with GPC and ECOG 0 achieved longer OS compared with those with PPC or ECOG 1–2, thus warranting further exploration in prospective cohorts. Full article

Background: There is ongoing discussion around the optimal course of treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) following the second line. Trifluridine/tipiracil (T) and regorafenib (R) have been the mainstay of therapy in this situation, as they both increased overall survival (OS) in comparison to a placebo. Despite the paucity of evidence, therapy rechallenge is also recognized as an option for practical use. In the third-line scenario of mCRC, we planned to investigate the survival outcomes using (T) and (R), both with and without prior rechallenge treatment. Materials and methods: Between 2012 and 2023, we examined the medical records of 1156 patients with refractory mCRC who were enrolled in the multicenter retrospective ReTrITA study. We then separated the patients into two cohorts based on the rechallenge therapy that was given before regorafenib and/or trifluridine/tipiracil at 17 Italian centres. Results: A total of 981 patients underwent T and/or R therapy, while 175 patients had therapy rechallenge before T and/or R. The median overall survival (mOS) for patients treated with T/R and R/T sequences in the rechallenge therapy cohort was 14.5 months and 17.6 months, respectively (p = 0.1955). A statistically significant survival benefit was observed in patients who received monotheraphy with R (mOS: 6 months) compared to the T group (mOS: 4.2 months) (p = 0.0332). In the same cohort, a median progression-free survival (mPFS) benefit was demonstrated in favour of the R/T group (11.3 months) vs. 9 months of the reverse sequence (p = 0.4004). In the no-rechallenge cohort, the mOS was statistically longer in the R/T sequence than in the T/R sequence (16.2 months vs. 12.3 months, respectively; p = 0.0014). In terms of the mPFS, we saw the same significant result for the adoption of R/T treatment (11.5 months vs. 8.4 months, respectively; p < 0.0001). The two monotherapy groups did not reveal any significant differences. Conclusions: This study suggests that rechallenge therapy may improve survival rates in the third-line treatment of mCRC, particularly if it is administered before sequential R/T treatment. This could allow for the extension of mCRC treatment choices until prospective studies are finished or randomised trials are performed. Full article

In advanced-stage colorectal cancer (CRC), a strategy based on a sequence of systemic therapies brings survival benefits in most patients. Trifluridine and tipiracil hydrochloride (TT) is a chemotherapy drug effective in patients in the third- or later line setting. No highly specific biomarkers have been established for TT therapy so far. However, a systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), which is based on platelet, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts is applied to predict prognosis. In this retrospective, multicenter study, clinical data on 179 metastatic CRC patients treated with TT were collected. To evaluate factors predicting TT therapy response and overall survival, univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted. Subsequently, factors with p < 0.05 in univariate analysis were included in multivariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis of progression-free survival (PFS), three favorable parameters were significant: good to moderate histological differentiation (p = 0.0038), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) < 5 ng/L (p = 0.0316) and SII ≤ 550 (p = 0.007). Favorable prognostic factors revealed in the multivariate analysis of overall survival (OS) were: <3 prior lines of treatment (p = 0.02), good to moderate histological differentiation (p = 0.0003), CEA < 5 ng/L (p = 0.0227) and SII ≤ 550 (p = 0.0001). Our study indicated that pre-treatment SII may be clinically useful for selecting likely responder patients and assessing the prognosis for mCRC patients treated with TT. Full article

Kirsten rat sarcoma virus oncogene homolog (KRAS) is the most frequently mutated oncogene in human cancer. In colorectal cancer (CRC), KRAS mutations are present in more than 50% of cases, and the KRAS glycine-to-cysteine mutation at codon 12 (KRAS G12C) occurs in up to 4% of patients. This mutation is associated with short responses to standard chemotherapy and worse overall survival compared to non-G12C mutations. In recent years, several KRAS G12C inhibitors have demonstrated clinical activity, although all patients eventually progressed. The identification of negative feedback through the EGFR receptor has led to the development of KRAS inhibitors plus an anti-EGFR combination, thus boosting antitumor activity. Currently, several KRAS G12C inhibitors are under development, and results from phase I and phase II clinical trials are promising. Moreover, the phase III CodeBreaK 300 trial demonstrates the superiority of sotorasib-panitumumab over trifluridine/tipiracil, establishing a new standard of care for patients with colorectal cancer harboring KRAS G12C mutations. Other combinations such as adagrasib-cetuximab, divarasib-cetuximab, or FOLFIRI-panitumumab-sotorasib have also shown a meaningful response rate and are currently under evaluation. Nonetheless, most of these patients will eventually relapse. In this setting, liquid biopsy emerges as a critical tool to characterize the mechanisms of resistance, consisting mainly of acquired genomic alterations in the MAPK and PI3K pathways and tyrosine kinase receptor alterations, but gene fusions, histological changes, or conformational changes in the kinase have also been described. In this paper, we review the development of KRAS G12C inhibitors in colorectal cancer as well as the main mechanisms of resistance. Full article

A novel liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method has been developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of tipiracil (TIP), trifluridine (FTD), and their metabolites, 5-trifluoromethyluracil (FTY) and 5-carboxy-2′-deoxyuridine (5CDU), in rat plasma. This method is highly sensitive, specific, and fast. Paracetamol (PAR) is used as an internal standard (IS). Using acetonitrile-induced protein precipitation, the analytes were extracted from a plasma sample and separated on a Waters BEH C18 (1.7 μm particle size, 50 mm × 2.1 mm ID) column protected by a security guard cartridge (C18, 4 × 2.0 mm). The isocratic mobile phase was made up of methanol and water containing 0.1% formic acid (80:20, v/v) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min for 4 min. The quantification was performed using a positive electrospray ionization (ESI) interface and a multiple-reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The MRM transitions employed were m/z 242.96 → 182.88 for TIP, 296.96 → 116.86 for FTD, 180.98 → 139.85 for FTY, 272.96 → 156.86 for 5CDU, and 151.97 → 92.68 for IS. The validated method complied with the guidelines set by the US-FDA over on a linear concentration range of 5–4000 ng/mL for FTD, FTY, and 5CDU, and 5–1000 ng/mL for TIP. The coefficient of determination (r2) was equal to or greater than 0.997. The corresponding lower limits of detection (LLOD) were 1.5 ng/mL for FTD, FTY, and 5CDU and 1.0 ng/mL for TIP. The recoveries of all analytes from rat plasma ranged from 88.67% to 112.18%, and the mean relative standard deviation (RSD) of accuracy and precision result was less than or equal to 6.84%. FTD, FTY, 5CDU, and TIP demonstrated adequate stability throughout the various circumstances examined. Additionally, no matrix effects were identified for any of the analytes. The assay was effectively utilized to conduct a pharmacokinetic study in rats following the oral administration of FTD and TIP at a dosage of 5.6 mg/kg, with a ratio of 1:0.5 for FTD and TIP, respectively. This indicates that the suggested approach is suitable for future clinical research. The pharmacokinetic parameters C_max (maximum concentration), T_max (time to reach maximum concentration), t1/2 (half-life), AUC_0-24 (area under the concentration–time curve from 0 to 24 h), AUC total (total area under the concentration–time curve), Ke (elimination rate constant), Vd (volume of distribution), and CL (clearance) of all analytes were assessed. The assay developed exhibits significant advancements compared to earlier bioanalytical methods documented in the literature. These improvements include high sensitivity, specificity, and efficacy in high throughput analysis of complex matrices. Additionally, the assay offers a shorter run time and smaller sample volume (50 μL). Full article

Systemic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) has improved considerably over the past 20 years. First- and second-line combinations of 5FU, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan, with or without anti-angiogenic and/or anti-EGFR antibodies, were approved shortly after the turn of the millennium. Further triumphs were not seen for almost 10 years, until the approval of initially regorafenib and shortly after trifluridine/tipiracil. A growing understanding of tumor biology through molecular profiling has led to further treatment options. Here, we review the most recent clinical data for late-line treatment options in mCRC, focusing on randomized trials if available. We include recommendations for options in unselected patients and therapies that should only be offered in patients with distinct tumor profiles (e.g., BRAF mutations, KRAS G12C mutations, HER2 amplification, deficient MMR, or NTRK gene fusions). Full article

Introduction: Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) and fruquintinib are novel antitumor agents for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We conducted a retrospective study to explore the clinical efficacy and drug toxicities of combination therapy with TAS-102 and fruquintinib in real-life clinical practice. Methods: Between March 2021 and February 2023, patients at two different centers with mCRC who failed two or more lines of prior therapy and received TAS-102 in combination with fruquintinib were recruited. Results: In total, 32 mCRC patients were included in the analysis. The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were 9.4% and 75%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.3 (95% CI: 5.3–7.3) and 13.5 (95% CI: 9.5–17.5) months, respectively. Patients without liver metastasis or peritoneal metastasis obtained better median PFS (7.1 m vs. 5.6 m, p = 0.03 and 6.3 m vs. 3.4 m, p = 0.04), and OS (15.2 m vs. 10.4 m, p = 0.01 and 13.6 m vs. 7.1 m, p = 0.03), respectively. Other clinicopathological features, including age, tumor site, KRAS status, dosage of fruquintinib, and treatment line, did not affect the clinical efficacy of TAS-102 combined with fruquintinib. The most common grade three–four toxicities were neutropenia (46.9%), anemia (21.9%), diarrhea (15.6%), nausea (12.5%), and hand–foot syndrome rash (12.5%). Conclusions: Our results suggest that TAS-102 combined with fruquintinib has promising clinical efficacy and manageable safety for refractory mCRC patients in a real-world clinical setting. Further prospective trials are warranted to confirm our results. Full article

Background: Patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) rarely receive third-line or further treatment. In this context, regorafenib (R) and trifluridine/tipiracil (T) are two important novel therapeutic choices with statistically significant increases in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and disease control, with different toxicity profiles. This study is a subgroup analysis of our larger retrospective study, already published, whose objective was to assess the outcomes of patients when R and T were given sequentially. Patients and Methods: The study involved thirteen Italian cancer centers on a 10-year retrospective observation (2012–2022). In this subgroup analysis, we focused our attention on the correlation between the first drug treatment duration (<3 months, 3 to <6 months and ≥6 months) and survival outcomes in patients who had received the sequence regorafenib-to-trifluridine/tipiracil, or vice versa. Results: The initial study included 866 patients with mCRC who received sequential T/R, or R/T, or T or R alone. This analysis is focused on evaluating the impact of the duration of the first treatment in the sequence on clinical outcomes (OS, PFS) and includes 146 and 116 patients of the T/R and R/T sequences, respectively. Based on the duration of the first drug treatment, subgroups for the T/R sequence included 27 patients (18.4%) who received T for <3 months, 86 (58.9%) treated for 3 to <6 months, and 33 (22.6%) treated for ≥6 months; in the reverse sequence (R as the first drug), subgroups included 18 patients (15.5%) who received their first treatment for <3 months, 62 (53.4%) treated for 3 to <6 months, and 35 (31.0%) treated for ≥6 months. In patients who received their first drug treatment for a period of 3 to <6 months, the R/T sequence had a significantly longer median OS (13.7 vs. 10.8 months, p = 0.0069) and a longer median PFS (10.8 vs. 8.5 months, p = 0.0003) than the T/R group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups with first drug treatment durations of <3 months and ≥6 months. Conclusions: Our analysis seems to suggest that the administration of R for a period of 3 to <6 months before that of T can prolong both OS and PFS, as compared to the opposite sequence. Full article

In the landscape of colorectal cancer treatment, classical chemotherapeutic agents such as 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, trifluridine, and tipiracil have historically played a pivotal role. This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of the top 100 most influential articles focusing on these classic chemotherapy drugs in the management of colorectal cancer. With this, we shed light on their current importance, despite the emergence of new therapeutic targets and treatments in the field of oncology. Systematically evaluating research outputs, this analysis reveals a prevalence of co-authorship among institutions, countries (led by the United States, China, and Europe), and researchers highlighting the global and collaborative nature of efforts in research, utilization, and development of these drugs. Three thematic axes lead the research: pharmacogenetics, the development of new pharmaceutical forms, and the use of adjuvants. This research serves as a foundation for future endeavors, aiding researchers, clinicians, and policymakers in making informed decisions about the direction of research and development in the dynamic field of colorectal cancer therapy. Full article

Trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) is an oral chemotherapy approved for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. The efficacy and tolerability of TAS-102 were shown in phase II-III clinical trials and in several real-life studies. The elderly and other special subgroups are underrepresented in published literature. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study to assess the effectiveness and safety of TAS-102 in consecutive patients with pretreated mCRC. In particular, we estimated the effectiveness and safety of TAS-102 in elderly patients (aged ≥70, ≥75 and ≥80 years) and in special subgroups, e.g., patients with concomitant heart disease. One hundred and sixty patients were enrolled. In particular, 71 patients (44%) were 70 years of age or older, 50 (31%) were 75 years of age or older, and 23 (14%) were 80 years of age or older. 19 patients (12%) had a concomitant chronic heart disease, three (2%) patients were HIV positive, and one (<1%) patient had a DPYD gene polymorphism. In 115 (72%) cases TAS-102 was administered as a third-line treatment. The median overall survival (OS) in the overall population was 8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 6–9), while the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3 months (95% CI, 3–4). No significant age-related reduction in effectiveness was observed in the subpopulations of elderly patients included. The toxicity profile was acceptable in both the whole and subgroups’ population. Our study confirms the effectiveness and safety of TAS-102 in patients with pretreated mCRC, suggesting a similar risk-benefit profile in the elderly. Full article