Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (157)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = stereotactic body radiation treatment

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
20 pages, 3005 KiB  
Review
EUS-Guided Pancreaticobiliary Ablation: Is It Ready for Prime Time?
by Nina Quirk, Rohan Ahuja and Nirav Thosani
Immuno 2025, 5(3), 30; https://doi.org/10.3390/immuno5030030 - 25 Jul 2025
Viewed by 295
Abstract
Despite advances in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation treatments for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), 5-year survival rates remain at nearly 11%. Cholangiocarcinoma, while not as severe, also possesses similar survival rates. Fewer than 20% of patients are surgical candidates at time of diagnosis; therefore, [...] Read more.
Despite advances in surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation treatments for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), 5-year survival rates remain at nearly 11%. Cholangiocarcinoma, while not as severe, also possesses similar survival rates. Fewer than 20% of patients are surgical candidates at time of diagnosis; therefore, it is imperative that alternative therapies are effective for non-surgical patients. There are several thermal ablative techniques, including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), microwave ablation (MWA), alcohol ablation, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), cryoablation, irreversible electroporation (IRE), biliary intraluminal brachytherapy, and biliary photodynamic therapy (PDT). Emerging literature in animal models and human patients has demonstrated that endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided RFA (EUS-RFA) prevents tumor progression through coagulative necrosis, protein denaturation, and activation of anticancer immunity in local and distant tumor tissue (abscopal effect). RFA treatment has been shown to not only reduce tumor-associated immunosuppressive cells but also increase functional T cells in distant tumor cells not treated with RFA. The remarkable ability to reduce tumor progression and promote tumor microenvironment (TME) remodeling makes RFA a very promising non-surgical therapy technique that has the potential to reduce mortality in this patient population. EUS-RFA offers superior precision and safety compared to other ablation techniques for pancreatic and biliary cancers, due to real-time imaging capabilities and minimally invasive nature. Future research should focus on optimizing RFA protocols, exploring combination therapies with chemotherapy or immunotherapy, and expanding its use in patients with metastatic disease. This review article will explore the current data and underlying pathophysiology of EUS-RFA while also highlighting the role of ablative therapies as a whole in immune activation response. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 589 KiB  
Article
CT-Based Radiomics Enhance Respiratory Function Analysis for Lung SBRT
by Alice Porazzi, Mattia Zaffaroni, Vanessa Eleonora Pierini, Maria Giulia Vincini, Aurora Gaeta, Sara Raimondi, Lucrezia Berton, Lars Johannes Isaksson, Federico Mastroleo, Sara Gandini, Monica Casiraghi, Gaia Piperno, Lorenzo Spaggiari, Juliana Guarize, Stefano Maria Donghi, Łukasz Kuncman, Roberto Orecchia, Stefania Volpe and Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
Bioengineering 2025, 12(8), 800; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12080800 - 25 Jul 2025
Viewed by 452
Abstract
Introduction: Radiomics is the extraction of non-invasive and reproducible quantitative imaging features, which may yield mineable information for clinical practice implementation. Quantification of lung function through radiomics could play a role in the management of patients with pulmonary lesions. The aim of this [...] Read more.
Introduction: Radiomics is the extraction of non-invasive and reproducible quantitative imaging features, which may yield mineable information for clinical practice implementation. Quantification of lung function through radiomics could play a role in the management of patients with pulmonary lesions. The aim of this study is to test the capability of radiomic features to predict pulmonary function parameters, focusing on the diffusing capacity of lungs to carbon monoxide (DLCO). Methods: Retrospective data were retrieved from electronical medical records of patients treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) at a single institution. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) SBRT treatment performed for primary early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (ES-NSCLC) or oligometastatic lung nodules, (2) availability of simulation four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) scan, (3) baseline spirometry data availability, (4) availability of baseline clinical data, and (5) written informed consent for the anonymized use of data. The gross tumor volume (GTV) was segmented on 4DCT reconstructed phases representing the moment of maximum inhalation and maximum exhalation (Phase 0 and Phase 50, respectively), and radiomic features were extracted from the lung parenchyma subtracting the lesion/s. An iterative algorithm was clustered based on correlation, while keeping only those most associated with baseline and post-treatment DLCO. Three models were built to predict DLCO abnormality: the clinical model—containing clinical information; the radiomic model—containing the radiomic score; the clinical-radiomic model—containing clinical information and the radiomic score. For the models just described, the following were constructed: Model 1 based on the features in Phase 0; Model 2 based on the features in Phase 50; Model 3 based on the difference between the two phases. The AUC was used to compare their performances. Results: A total of 98 patients met the inclusion criteria. The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scored as the clinical variable most associated with baseline DLCO (p = 0.014), while the most associated features were mainly texture features and similar among the two phases. Clinical-radiomic models were the best at predicting both baseline and post-treatment abnormal DLCO. In particular, the performances for the three clinical-radiomic models at predicting baseline abnormal DLCO were AUC1 = 0.72, AUC2 = 0.72, and AUC3 = 0.75, for Model 1, Model 2, and Model 3, respectively. Regarding the prediction of post-treatment abnormal DLCO, the performances of the three clinical-radiomic models were AUC1 = 0.91, AUC2 = 0.91, and AUC3 = 0.95, for Model 1, Model 2, and Model 3, respectively. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that radiomic features extracted from healthy lung parenchyma on a 4DCT scan are associated with baseline pulmonary function parameters, showing that radiomics can add a layer of information in surrogate models for lung function assessment. Preliminary results suggest the potential applicability of these models for predicting post-SBRT lung function, warranting validation in larger, prospective cohorts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Engineering the Future of Radiotherapy: Innovations and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 1413 KiB  
Article
NRG Oncology Liver Proton SBRT and Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy: Current Treatment Technical Assessment and Practice Patterns
by Minglei Kang, Paige A. Taylor, Jiajian Shen, Jun Zhou, Jatinder Saini, Theodore S. Hong, Kristin Higgins, Wei Liu, Ying Xiao, Charles B. Simone and Liyong Lin
Cancers 2025, 17(14), 2369; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17142369 - 17 Jul 2025
Viewed by 517
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Proton therapy delivers highly conformal doses to the target area without producing an exit dose, minimizing cumulative doses to healthy liver tissue. This study aims to evaluate current practices, challenges, and variations in the implementation of proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Proton therapy delivers highly conformal doses to the target area without producing an exit dose, minimizing cumulative doses to healthy liver tissue. This study aims to evaluate current practices, challenges, and variations in the implementation of proton stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and hypofractionated therapy for liver malignancies, with the goal of providing a technical assessment to promote broader adoption and support future clinical trials. Methods and Materials: An extensive survey was conducted by NRG Oncology across North American proton treatment centers to assess the current practices of proton liver SBRT and hypofractionated therapy. The survey focused on key aspects, including patient selection, prescription and normal tissue constraints, simulation and motion management, treatment planning, quality assurance (QA), treatment delivery, and the use of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). Results: This survey captures the current practice patterns and status of proton SBRT and hypofractionated therapy in liver cancer treatment.  Proton therapy is increasingly preferred for treating inoperable liver malignancies due to its ability to minimize healthy tissue exposure. However, the precision required for proton therapy presents challenges, particularly in managing uncertainties and target motion during high-dose fractions and short treatment courses. Survey findings revealed significant variability in clinical practices across centers, highlighting differences in motion management, dose fractionation schedules, and QA protocols. Conclusion: Proton SBRT and hypofractionated therapy offer significant potential for treating liver malignancies. A comprehensive approach involving precise patient selection, treatment planning, and QA is essential for ensuring safety and effectiveness. This survey provides valuable insights into current practices and challenges, offering a foundation for technical recommendations to optimize the use of proton therapy and guide future clinical trials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Proton Therapy of Cancer Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2265 KiB  
Review
Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT): Challenging Scenarios and New Frontiers
by Serena Badellino, Francesco Cuccia, Marco Galaverni, Marianna Miele, Matteo Sepulcri, Maria Alessia Zerella, Ruggero Spoto, Emanuele Alì, Emanuela Olmetto, Luca Boldrini, Antonio Pontoriero and Paolo Borghetti
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 4871; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144871 - 9 Jul 2025
Viewed by 672
Abstract
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a pivotal treatment modality for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), offering highly precise, high-dose radiation delivery. However, several clinical challenges remain, particularly in the treatment of central or ultracentral tumors, which are located near critical [...] Read more.
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a pivotal treatment modality for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), offering highly precise, high-dose radiation delivery. However, several clinical challenges remain, particularly in the treatment of central or ultracentral tumors, which are located near critical structures such as the heart, bronchi, and great vessels. The introduction of MRI-guided SBRT has significantly improved targeting precision, allowing for better assessment of tumor motion and adjacent organ structures. Additionally, SBRT has demonstrated efficacy in multifocal NSCLC, providing an effective option for patients with multiple primary tumors. Recent advances also highlight the role of SBRT in locally advanced NSCLC, where it is increasingly used as a complementary approach to concurrent chemotherapy or in cases where surgery is not feasible. Moreover, the combination of SBRT with immunotherapy has shown promising potential, enhancing tumor control and immunological responses. Furthermore, SBRTs application in SCLC is gaining momentum as a palliative and potentially curative option for selected patients. This narrative review explores these evolving clinical scenarios, the technical innovations supporting SBRT, and the integration of immunotherapy, providing an in-depth look at the new frontiers of SBRT in lung cancer treatment. Despite the challenges, the ongoing development of personalized approaches and technological advancements continues to push the boundaries of SBRTs clinical utility in lung cancer. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2036 KiB  
Review
Radiogenomics of Stereotactic Radiotherapy: Genetic Mechanisms Underlying Radiosensitivity, Resistance, and Immune Response
by Damir Vučinić, Ana-Marija Bukovica Petrc, Ivona Antončić, Maja Kolak Radojčić, Matea Lekić and Felipe Couñago
Genes 2025, 16(7), 732; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16070732 - 24 Jun 2025
Viewed by 929
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers ablative radiation doses with sub-millimeter precision. Radiogenomic studies, meanwhile, provide insights into how tumor-intrinsic genetic factors influence responses to such high-dose treatments. This review explores the radiobiological mechanisms underpinning SBRT efficacy, emphasizing the roles of DNA damage response [...] Read more.
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivers ablative radiation doses with sub-millimeter precision. Radiogenomic studies, meanwhile, provide insights into how tumor-intrinsic genetic factors influence responses to such high-dose treatments. This review explores the radiobiological mechanisms underpinning SBRT efficacy, emphasizing the roles of DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, tumor suppressor gene alterations, and inflammatory signaling in shaping tumor radiosensitivity or resistance. SBRT induces complex DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) that robustly activate DDR signaling cascades, particularly via the ATM and ATR kinases. Tumors with proficient DNA repair capabilities often resist SBRT, whereas deficiencies in key repair genes can render them more susceptible to radiation-induced cytotoxicity. Mutations in tumor suppressor genes may impair p53-dependent apoptosis and disrupt cell cycle checkpoints, allowing malignant cells to evade radiation-induced cell death. Furthermore, SBRT provokes the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and activates innate immune pathways, potentially leading to immunogenic cell death and reshaping the tumor microenvironment. Radiogenomic profiling has identified genomic alterations and molecular signatures associated with differential responses to SBRT and immune activation. These insights open avenues for precision radiotherapy approaches, including the use of genomic biomarkers for patient selection, the integration of SBRT with DDR inhibitors or immunotherapies, and the customization of treatment plans based on individual tumor genotypes and immune landscapes. Ultimately, these strategies aim to enhance SBRT efficacy and improve clinical outcomes through biologically tailored treatment. This review provides a comprehensive summary of current knowledge on the genetic determinants of response to stereotactic radiotherapy and discusses their implications for personalized cancer treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics and Genomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 713 KiB  
Article
Ablative Five-Fraction CT Versus MR-Guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer: In Silico Evaluation of Interfraction Anatomic Changes as a Rationale for Online Adaptive Replanning
by Adeel Kaiser, Nicole Luther, Kathryn E. Mittauer, Amna Gul, Robert A. Herrera, Mukesh K. Roy, Ashley Fellows, Amy Rzepczynski, Will Deere, Matthew D. Hall, Rupesh Kotecha, Nema Bassiri-Gharb, Alonso N. Gutierrez and Michael D. Chuong
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2061; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132061 - 20 Jun 2025
Viewed by 694
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Non-ablative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is commonly employed for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) using computed tomography-guided radiotherapy (CTgRT) without online adaptive radiation therapy (oART). The safe delivery of ablative SBRT has been demonstrated using stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiation [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Non-ablative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is commonly employed for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) using computed tomography-guided radiotherapy (CTgRT) without online adaptive radiation therapy (oART). The safe delivery of ablative SBRT has been demonstrated using stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART). We performed an in silico comparison of non-adapted CTgRT versus SMART to better understand the potential benefit of oART for ablative pancreatic SBRT. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated original and daily adapted SMART plans that were previously delivered for 20 consecutive LAPC cases (120 total plans across all patients) treated on a 0.35 T MR-linac prescribed to 50 Gy (gross disease) and 33 Gy (elective sites) simultaneously in five fractions. Six comparative CTgRT plans for each patient (one original, five daily treatment) were retrospectively generated with the same prescribed dose and planning parameters as the SMART plans assuming no oART availability. The impact of daily anatomic changes on CTgRT and SMART plans without oART was evaluated across each treatment day MRI scan acquired for SMART. Results: Ninety percent of cases involved the pancreatic head. No statistically significant differences were seen between CTgRT and SMART with respect to target coverage. Nearly all (96%) fractions planned on either CT or MRI platforms exceeded at least one GI organ at risk (OAR) constraint without oART. Significant differences favoring SMART over non-adaptive CTgRT were observed for the duodenum V35 Gy ≤ 0.5 cc (34.2 vs. 41.9 Gy, p = 0.0035) and duodenum V40 Gy ≤ 0.03 cc (37 vs. 52.5 Gy, p = 0.0006) constraints. Stomach V40 Gy trended towards significance favoring SMART (37 vs. 40.3 Gy, p = 0.057) while no significant differences were seen. Conclusions: This is the first study that quantifies the frequency and extent of GI OAR constraint violations that would occur during ablative five-fraction SBRT using SMART vs. CTgRT. GI OAR constraint violations are expected for most fractions without oART whereas all constraints can be achieved with oART. As such, these data suggest that oART should be required for ablative five-fraction pancreatic SBRT. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 724 KiB  
Article
Planned Liver Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy for Residual Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases After Surgery: A Single-Arm Retrospective Study
by Sixuan Li, Dezuo Dong, Xuan Zheng, Hongzhi Wang, Kun Wang, Baocai Xing and Weihu Wang
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(6), 347; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32060347 - 12 Jun 2025
Viewed by 832
Abstract
Given the promising outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs), we proposed an innovative strategy combining surgery with planned liver SBRT for CRLMs. This retrospective study included patients who underwent curative-intent surgery combined with planned liver [...] Read more.
Given the promising outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLMs), we proposed an innovative strategy combining surgery with planned liver SBRT for CRLMs. This retrospective study included patients who underwent curative-intent surgery combined with planned liver SBRT from July 2019 to October 2023. Planned liver SBRT was delivered to residual unresectable and unablatable lesions with maximum diameters of ≤5 cm. Outcomes included local failure (LF), intrahepatic recurrence-free survival (IHRFS), extrahepatic recurrence-free survival (EHRFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and radiation-related adverse events. A total of 69 patients were included. The 1-, and 2-year cumulative incidence rates of LF after SBRT were 7.7%, and 9.6%, respectively. The median PFS was 6.2 months, and the median OS was 45.8 months. Multivariate analysis identified RAS/BRAF mutations, extrahepatic metastases excluding lung involvement, and higher CEA as independent predictors of poorer OS. Intrahepatic recurrence was the predominant pattern of first disease progression after combination treatment. Acute grade 1–2 radiation-related adverse events occurred in 56.5% of patients, while grade 3 toxicities were reported in 4.3%. This approach offers favorable long-term outcomes, suggesting its potential to broaden the indications for curative-intent local treatments in CRLMs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 2507 KiB  
Case Report
On the Use of 4D-PET/CT for the Safe SBRT Re-Irradiation of Central Lung Recurrence Within Radiation-Induced Fibrosis: A Clinical Case
by Paul Retif, Emilie Verrecchia-Ramos, Motchy Saleh, Abdourahamane Djibo Sidikou, Romain Letellier, Anwar Al Salah, Estelle Pfletschinger, Fabian Taesch, Sinan Ben-Mahmoud and Xavier Michel
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4015; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124015 - 6 Jun 2025
Viewed by 712
Abstract
Background: The re-irradiation of centrally located lung tumors poses substantial risks due to prior dose exposure and proximity to critical structures. Accurate target delineation is crucial to minimize toxicity and ensure tumor coverage. Four-dimensional positron emission tomography/computed tomography (4D-PET/CT) integrates respiratory motion and [...] Read more.
Background: The re-irradiation of centrally located lung tumors poses substantial risks due to prior dose exposure and proximity to critical structures. Accurate target delineation is crucial to minimize toxicity and ensure tumor coverage. Four-dimensional positron emission tomography/computed tomography (4D-PET/CT) integrates respiratory motion and metabolic data, offering improved delineation over static imaging. Its clinical utility in re-irradiation remains under-reported. Methods: A 67-year-old male presented with the central recurrence of squamous cell carcinoma in the right upper lobe, embedded in radiation-induced fibrosis, following prior chemoradiotherapy. Delineation using static PET underestimated tumor motion. A 4D-PET/CT-guided Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) plan was developed with a prescription of 60 Gy in eight fractions. A comparative plan using static PET was generated to assess the dosimetric differences. Results: The internal target volume (ITV) from 4D-PET/CT was nearly double the size of the GTV from static PET, with a 5.1 mm discrepancy in the craniocaudal axis. The 4D-PET-based plan achieved 95.0% PTV coverage, while the static PET-based plan covered only 61.7%, illustrating the risk of underdosage without motion-resolved imaging. The patient completed the treatment without acute or late toxicity and showed a sustained metabolic response at one year (SUVmax from 13.4 to 5.8). Conclusions: This case demonstrates the clinical value of 4D-PET/CT in the SBRT re-irradiation of centrally located lung tumors, particularly in fibrotic regions where anatomical imaging is insufficient. It enabled accurate delineation, improved dosimetric coverage, and safe, effective retreatment. These findings support its integration into planning for complex thoracic re-irradiation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Clinical Role of Imaging in Lung Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 2285 KiB  
Review
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Present and Future Prospectives
by Vikrant Rai
Biomolecules 2025, 15(6), 751; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15060751 - 22 May 2025
Viewed by 1144
Abstract
Prostate cancer, a slow-growing tumor, develops through the over-proliferation of malignant cells in the prostate and is one of the most common types of cancer. Active surveillance, radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation, brachytherapy, cryotherapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, hormone therapy, and chemotherapy are [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer, a slow-growing tumor, develops through the over-proliferation of malignant cells in the prostate and is one of the most common types of cancer. Active surveillance, radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation, brachytherapy, cryotherapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, hormone therapy, and chemotherapy are common treatment strategies for prostate cancer. However, resistance to treatment in advanced prostate cancer is a concerning issue in the use of these therapies. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for prostate cancer is an emerging strategy for the treatment of advanced prostate cancers but the resistance and limited efficacy to ICIs observed in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) raises concerns. The ongoing clinical trials for combination therapies for mCRPC have provided some hope. This review concisely discusses the molecular and cellular mechanisms, immunotherapy, the limitations of ICIs, combination therapies, and the prospects of developing novel therapeutics for prostate cancer. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 9960 KiB  
Article
Histology-Specific Treatment Strategies and Survival Prediction in Lung Cancer Patients with Spinal Metastases: A Nationwide Analysis
by Abdul Karim Ghaith, Xinlan Yang, Taha Khalilullah, Xihang Wang, Melanie Alfonzo Horowitz, Jawad Khalifeh, A. Karim Ahmed, Tej Azad, Joshua Weinberg, Abdel-Hameed Al-Mistarehi, Chase Foster, Meghana Bhimreddy, Arjun K. Menta, Kristin J. Redmond, Nicholas Theodore and Daniel Lubelski
Cancers 2025, 17(8), 1374; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17081374 - 21 Apr 2025
Viewed by 818
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Spinal metastases are a common and severe complication of lung cancer, particularly in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and are associated with poor survival. Despite advancements in treatment, optimal management strategies remain unclear, with significant differences between non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Spinal metastases are a common and severe complication of lung cancer, particularly in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and are associated with poor survival. Despite advancements in treatment, optimal management strategies remain unclear, with significant differences between non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and SCLC. This study evaluates treatment patterns, survival outcomes, and prognostic factors in lung cancer patients with spinal metastases, integrating deep learning survival prediction models. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to identify NSCLC and SCLC patients diagnosed with spinal metastases. Demographics and treatment modalities were analyzed and adjusted for age, sex, and comorbidities. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models assessed overall survival (OS). Five advanced survival prediction models estimated 1-year and 10-year mortality, with feature importance determined via permutation analysis. Results: Among 428,919 lung cancer patients, 5.1% developed spinal metastases, with a significantly higher incidence in SCLC (13.6%) than in NSCLC (5.1%). SCLC patients had poorer OS. Radiation therapy alone was the predominant treatment, and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) predicted better short- and long-term survival compared to other radiation techniques. High-dose radiation (71–150 Gy BED) improved OS in NSCLC, while reirradiation benefited NSCLC but had a limited impact in SCLC. SurvTrace demonstrated the highest predictive accuracy for 1-year and 10-year mortality, identifying age, radiation dose, reirradiation, and race as key prognostic factors. Conclusions: The management of spinal metastases requires a histology-specific approach. Radiation remains the primary treatment, with SBRT predicting better short- and long-term survival. High-dose radiation and reirradiation should be considered for NSCLC, while the benefits are limited in SCLC. These findings support histology-specific treatment strategies to improve survival of patients with metastatic lung cancer to the spine. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Surgical Treatment of Spinal Tumors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 5342 KiB  
Case Report
Hybrid Therapy with SBRT Target-Tailored Tumor Resection for High-Grade Metastatic Epidural Spinal Cord Compression (MESCC): Illustrative Case
by Mario De Robertis, Lorenzo Lo Faro, Linda Bianchini, Ali Baram, Leonardo Anselmi, Elena Clerici, Pierina Navarria, Marco Riva, Marta Scorsetti, Federico Pessina and Carlo Brembilla
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(5), 1688; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051688 - 3 Mar 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 902
Abstract
Background: Spinal metastases affect approximately 40% of patients with systemic cancers; metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) occurs in up to 20% of cases and leads to potential significant morbidity. Recent advancements in high-dose conformal radiation techniques, such as Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy [...] Read more.
Background: Spinal metastases affect approximately 40% of patients with systemic cancers; metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) occurs in up to 20% of cases and leads to potential significant morbidity. Recent advancements in high-dose conformal radiation techniques, such as Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) and Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS), enable histology-independent ablative treatments, yet optimal dose fractionation remains undetermined. Methods and Results: This case of vertebral metastases with high-grade ESCC exemplifies the model of a comprehensive treatment workflow that emphasizes interdisciplinary collaboration, within the framework of a personalized medicine. The “Hybrid Therapy” combines Separation Surgery, aimed at achieving circumferential spinal cord decompression, with SBRT/SRS. The oncologic resection has been performed in a navigation-assisted technique that is tailored to the SBRT target, pre-operatively defined on the neuronavigation station. Conclusions: This seamless integration during initial planning of surgery with the ideal radio-oncological target is aimed at avoiding delays in referral and limitations in subsequent treatment options. This integrative holistic strategy not only prioritizes functional preservation, minimizing surgical invasiveness, but also promotes tumor control, thus offering potential promising new avenues for patient-centered oncologic care. Future high-quality studies are warranted to validate the widespread potential utility and safety of this approach. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 363 KiB  
Review
Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Renal Cell Carcinoma with Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombus
by Ilona Pilosov Solomon, Gal Rinott Mizrahi, Ilan Klein, Yoram Dekel and Yuval Freifeld
Cancers 2025, 17(4), 710; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17040710 - 19 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1018
Abstract
The prognosis for untreated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (IVC TT) is poor, and the only curative treatment option is extirpative surgery. However, radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Historically, [...] Read more.
The prognosis for untreated renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (IVC TT) is poor, and the only curative treatment option is extirpative surgery. However, radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Historically, RCC was considered radioresistant, but it appears to be sensitive to higher doses per fraction. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), which delivers high ablative radiation doses to focal targets, has been shown to be an effective treatment option for both non-metastatic and metastatic RCC. Emerging data also suggest its role in the management of RCC with IVC TT. This article reviews the available evidence on the use of SBRT in RCC patients with IVC TT, considering its application as curative, palliative, and neoadjuvant therapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 1027 KiB  
Review
Targeting Ventricular Arrhythmias in Non-Ischemic Patients: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment
by Laura Adina Stanciulescu, Maria Dorobantu and Radu Vatasescu
Diagnostics 2025, 15(4), 420; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15040420 - 9 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1205
Abstract
Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) present significant clinical challenges due to their diverse etiologies and complex arrhythmogenic substrates, which differ from those in ischemic heart disease. Recent advancements in imaging, electrophysiological mapping, and ablative therapy have improved the management of these [...] Read more.
Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) present significant clinical challenges due to their diverse etiologies and complex arrhythmogenic substrates, which differ from those in ischemic heart disease. Recent advancements in imaging, electrophysiological mapping, and ablative therapy have improved the management of these arrhythmias. This review examines the spectrum of NICM subtypes, discussing their pathophysiology, prevalence, genetic determinants, and associated arrhythmias. It also explores contemporary ablative techniques, including epicardial, bipolar, and irrigated approaches, as well as emerging modalities such as stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The role of novel technologies, including high-resolution mapping and artificial intelligence, is considered in refining diagnosis and treatment. This article provides a comprehensive overview of current management strategies and discusses future directions in the treatment of VAs in NICM patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Arrhythmias)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2212 KiB  
Article
Advanced External Beam Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Skull Base Reirradiation
by He Wang, Fahed M. Alsanea, Dong Joo Rhee, Xiaodong Zhang, Wei Liu, Jinzhong Yang, Zhifei Wen, Yao Zhao, Tyler D. Williamson, Rachel A. Hunter, Peter A. Balter, Tina M. Briere, Ronald X. Zhu, Anna Lee, Amy C. Moreno, Jay P. Reddy, Adam S. Garden, David I. Rosenthal, Gary B. Gunn and Jack Phan
Cancers 2025, 17(3), 540; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17030540 - 5 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1555
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for skull base reirradiation is particularly challenging, as patients have already received substantial radiation doses to the region, and nearby normal organs may have approached their tolerance limit from prior treatments. In this study, we reviewed the [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for skull base reirradiation is particularly challenging, as patients have already received substantial radiation doses to the region, and nearby normal organs may have approached their tolerance limit from prior treatments. In this study, we reviewed the characteristics and capabilities of four advanced external beam radiation delivery systems and four modern treatment planning systems and evaluated the treatment plan quality of each technique using skull base reirradiation patient cases. Methods: SBRT plans were generated for sixteen skull base reirradiation patients using four modalities: the GK plan for the Elekta Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion/ICON, the CyberKnife (CK) plan for the Accuray CyberKnife, the intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan for the Hitachi ProBeat-FR proton therapy machine, and the volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan for the Varian TrueBeam STx. These plans were evaluated and compared using two novel gradient indices in addition to traditional dosimetry metrics for targets and organs at risk (OARs). The steepest border gradient quantified the percent prescription dose fall-off per millimeter at the boundary between the target and adjacent critical structures. This gradient index highlighted the system’s ability to spare nearby critical OARs. The volume gradient assessed the extent of dose spread outside the target toward the patient’s body. Results: All plans achieved comparable target coverage and conformity, while IMPT and VMAT demonstrated significantly better uniformity. The GK plans exhibited the highest border gradient, up to 20.9%/mm, followed by small-spot-size IMPT plans and CK plans. Additionally, IMPT plans showed the benefit of reduced dose spread in low-dose regions and the lowest maximum and mean doses to the brainstem and carotid artery. Conclusions: The advanced external beam radiotherapy modalities evaluated in this study are well-suited for SBRT in skull base reirradiation, which demands precise targeting of tumors with highly conformal doses and steep dose gradients to protect nearby normal structures. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 309 KiB  
Review
Advancements in Locoregional Therapies for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
by Conor D. J. O’Donnell, Umair Majeed, Michael S. Rutenberg, Kristopher P. Croome, Katherine E. Poruk, Beau Toskich and Zhaohui Jin
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(2), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32020082 - 31 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2434
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with rising incidence and poor outcomes. This review examines recent advancements in locoregional therapies for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, focusing on external beam radiotherapy, transarterial radioembolization (TARE), hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy, and liver transplantation. Stereotactic body [...] Read more.
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with rising incidence and poor outcomes. This review examines recent advancements in locoregional therapies for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, focusing on external beam radiotherapy, transarterial radioembolization (TARE), hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy, and liver transplantation. Stereotactic body radiation therapy and proton beam therapy have shown promise in achieving local control and improving survival. TARE, with personalized dosimetry, has demonstrated encouraging results in select patient populations. HAIP chemotherapy, primarily studied using floxuridine, has yielded impressive survival outcomes in phase II trials. Liver transplantation, once contraindicated, is now being reconsidered for carefully selected patients with localized disease. While these locoregional approaches show potential, randomized controlled trials comparing them to standard systemic therapy are lacking. Patient selection remains crucial, with factors such as liver function, tumor burden, and molecular profile influencing treatment decisions. Ongoing research aims to optimize treatment sequencing, explore combination strategies with systemic therapies, and refine phenotype identification and patient selection criteria. As the landscape of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma management evolves, a multidisciplinary approach is essential to tailor treatment strategies and improve outcomes for patients with this challenging disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biliary Tract Cancer Updates: Advancements and Insights)
Back to TopTop