Objective: Volleyball athletes require well-developed balance control during spiking, blocking, rapid movement, and landing. Joint range of motion (ROM) may also influence limb extension, support adjustment, and center-of-mass control. Previous studies have usually examined balance ability and joint ROM as separate factors related
[...] Read more.
Objective: Volleyball athletes require well-developed balance control during spiking, blocking, rapid movement, and landing. Joint range of motion (ROM) may also influence limb extension, support adjustment, and center-of-mass control. Previous studies have usually examined balance ability and joint ROM as separate factors related to volleyball performance. However, the associations between dynamic balance, static balance, and multi-joint ROM in the upper and lower limbs remain insufficiently understood. This study therefore aimed to examine the relationship between balance performance and upper- and lower-limb joint ROM in female college volleyball athletes. Methods: Thirty-five female college volleyball athletes were included. Dynamic balance of the upper and lower limbs was assessed using the Y-Balance Test, and static balance was evaluated under eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions using a static balance platform. Upper- and lower-limb ROM was measured using an electronic goniometer and the knee-to-wall test. Paired-sample
t-tests were used to compare bilateral differences and differences between visual conditions. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to examine associations between joint ROM and balance performance, and false discovery rate (FDR) correction was applied to account for multiple comparisons. Results: (1) No significant bilateral difference was observed in upper-limb YBT-UQ performance (
p > 0.05); for lower-limb YBT-LQ performance, a significant difference was found only in the anterior direction, with the right side showing higher values than the left side (
p < 0.01). (2) Static balance parameters under the eyes-closed condition were significantly poorer than those under the eyes-open condition (
p < 0.01); under the same visual condition, only the total sway path length of the right foot was significantly shorter than that of the left foot (
p < 0.05). (3) The ranges of motion of right shoulder flexion, shoulder horizontal adduction, shoulder external rotation, elbow flexion, and knee-to-wall distance were significantly greater than that of the left side (all
p < 0.05), and right hip internal rotation ROM was also significantly greater than that of the left side (
p < 0.01). (4) Dynamic balance was correlated with selected joint ROM measures. Specifically, the anterior reach direction of the right YBT-LQ was positively correlated with hip flexion ROM (r = 0.593,
p < 0.01) and knee-to-wall distance (r = 0.653,
p < 0.01), and these correlations remained statistically significant after FDR correction. (5) Static balance parameters were correlated with selected lower-limb joint ROM measures in the original correlation analysis; however, these correlations did not remain significant after FDR correction. Conclusions: Female college volleyball athletes demonstrated a certain degree of bilateral asymmetry in dynamic balance and a pronounced dependence on visual input during static balance tasks. After FDR correction, the associations between the anterior reach direction of the right YBT-LQ and both hip flexion ROM and knee-to-wall distance remained stable, suggesting that these ROM measures may be related to anterior dynamic balance performance. These findings may provide a reference for postural control assessment and the development of sport-specific training programs for female volleyball athletes.
Full article