Search Results (675)

Background/Objectives: While robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has shown potential benefits over open radical cystectomy (ORC), such as reduced blood loss and quicker recovery, its adoption has been limited because of its complexity and long learning curve, especially for urinary diversion. We assessed whether a RARC program with fully intracorporeal urinary diversion could be safely implemented in a hospital with no prior experience in RARC, but with expertise in ORC and other robotic surgeries. We also compared perioperative outcomes and complications between RARC and ORC during the implementation phase. Methods: This retrospective comparative study included 50 consecutive patients who underwent RARC between June 2023 and January 2025 and 50 patients previously treated with ORC. All RARC cases were performed with intracorporeal urinary diversion. A structured proctoring program guided two surgeons through a stepwise training approach by an expert RARC surgeon. Perioperative outcomes and 90-day complications were compared. Results: All RARC procedures were completed fully intracorporeally with no conversions to open surgery. Compared with ORC, RARC was associated with significantly shorter operative times (for ileal conduit diversion) and hospital stays, lower estimated blood loss, and fewer postoperative complications. There were no differences in intraoperative complications. Worst single grade ≥ 3 complications were significantly less frequent in the RARC than the ORC group (11 [11%] versus 21 [21%], p = 0.045). On multivariable analysis, the robotic approach independently predicted fewer any-grade complications (odds ratio 0.81, 95% confidence intervals 0.65–0.95, p = 0.01). Conclusions: A RARC program can be safely and effectively implemented in a previously RARC-naïve centre with existing surgical expertise. The robotic approach offers clear perioperative benefits and may represent a favourable alternative to open surgery. Full article

Background: Automated surgical navigation can be separated into three stages: (1) organ identification and localization, (2) identification of the organs requiring further surgery, and (3) automated planning of the operation path and steps. With its ideal visual and operating system, the da Vinci surgical system provides a promising platform for automated surgical navigation. This study focuses on the first step in automated surgical navigation by identifying organs in gynecological surgery. Methods: Due to the difficulty of collecting da Vinci gynecological endoscopy data, we propose DeepVinci, a novel end-to-end high-performance encoder–decoder network based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for pixel-level organ semantic segmentation. Specifically, to overcome the drawback of a limited field of view, we incorporate a densely multi-scale pyramid module and feature fusion module, which can also enhance the global context information. In addition, the system integrates an edge supervision network to refine the segmented results on the decoding side. Results: Experimental results show that DeepVinci can achieve state-of-the-art accuracy, obtaining dice similarity coefficient and mean pixel accuracy values of 0.684 and 0.700, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed DeepVinci network presents a practical and competitive semantic segmentation solution for da Vinci gynecological surgery. Full article

The management of adult spinal deformity (ASD) has evolved dramatically over the past century, transitioning from external bracing and in situ fusion to complex, technology-driven surgical interventions. This review traces the historical development of spinal deformity correction and highlights contemporary enabling technologies that are redefining the surgical landscape. Advances in stereoradiographic imaging now allow for precise, low-dose three-dimensional assessment of spinopelvic parameters and segmental bone density, facilitating individualized surgical planning. Robotic assistance and intraoperative navigation improve the accuracy and safety of instrumentation, while patient-specific rods and interbody implants enhance biomechanical conformity and alignment precision. Machine learning and predictive modeling tools have emerged as valuable adjuncts for risk stratification, surgical planning, and outcome forecasting. Minimally invasive deformity correction strategies, including anterior column realignment and circumferential minimally invasive surgery (cMIS), have demonstrated equivalent clinical and radiographic outcomes to traditional open surgery with reduced perioperative morbidity in select patients. Despite these advancements, complications such as proximal junctional kyphosis and failure remain prevalent. Adjunctive strategies—including ligamentous tethering, modified proximal fixation, and vertebral cement augmentation—offer promising preventive potential. Collectively, these innovations signal a paradigm shift toward precision spine surgery, characterized by data-informed decision-making, individualized construct design, and improved patient-centered outcomes in spinal deformity care. Full article

Background/Objectives: Posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysms are one of the most difficult cerebrovascular lesions to treat and account for 0.5–3% of all intracranial aneurysms. They have deep anatomical locations, broad-neck configurations, high perforator density, and a close association with the brainstem, which creates considerable technical challenges for either microsurgical or endovascular treatment. Despite its acceptance as the standard of care for most posterior circulation aneurysms, PICA aneurysms are often associated with flow diversion using a coil or flow diversion due to incomplete occlusions, parent vessel compromise and high rate of recurrence. This case aims to describe the utility of microsurgical clipping as a durable and definitive option demonstrating the value of tailored surgical planning, preservation of anatomy and ancillary technologies for protecting a genuine outcome in ruptured PICA aneurysms. Methods: A 66-year-old male was evaluated for an acute subarachnoid hemorrhage from a ruptured and broad-necked fusiform left PICA aneurysm at the vertebra–PICA junction. Endovascular therapy was not an option due to morphology and the center of the recurrence; therefore, a microsurgical approach was essential. A far-lateral craniotomy with a partial C1 laminectomy was carried out for proximal vascular control, with careful dissection of the perforating arteries and precise clip application for the complete exclusion of the aneurysm whilst preserving distal PICA flow. Results: Post-operative imaging demonstrated the complete obliteration of the aneurysm with unchanged cerebrovascular flow dynamics. The patient had progressive neurological recovery with no new cranial nerve deficits or ischemic complications. Long-term follow-up demonstrated stable aneurysm exclusion and full functional independence emphasizing the sustainability of microsurgical intervention in challenging PICA aneurysms. Conclusions: This case intends to highlight the current and evolving role of microsurgical practice for treating posterior circulation aneurysms, particularly at a time when endovascular alternatives are limited by anatomy and hemodynamics. Advances in artificial intelligence cerebral aneurysm rupture prediction, high-resolution vessel wall imaging, robotic-assisted microsurgery and new generation flow-modifying implants have the potential to revolutionize treatment paradigms by embedding precision medicine principles into aneurysm management. While the discipline of cerebrovascular surgery is expanding, it can be combined together with microsurgery, endovascular technologies and computational knowledge to ensure individualized, durable, and minimally invasive treatment options for high-risk PICA aneurysms. Full article

Colorectal surgery has undergone significant advances over the past few decades, driven by the evolution of minimally invasive techniques, particularly laparoscopy and robotics. While laparoscopy is widely recognized for its short-term benefits and oncological safety, the increasing adoption of robot-assisted surgery (RAS) has generated considerable debate regarding its clinical benefits, economic implications, and overall impact on patient outcomes. This narrative review synthesizes the existing evidence, highlighting the clinical and economic aspects of RAS in colorectal surgery, while exploring areas for future research. The findings suggest that RAS offers potential technical advantages, including increased precision, three-dimensional visualization, and improved ergonomics, particularly in anatomically complex scenarios such as low rectal resections. Still, its superiority over laparoscopy remains inconclusive and current evidence is mixed. For colon cancer, meta-analyses and analyses of large cohorts suggest lower conversion rates and faster recovery with RAS, although data are mostly retrospective and lack long-term oncological endpoints. In rectal cancer, emerging evidence from randomized controlled trials demonstrates improved short-term outcomes. Additionally, the recently published three-year results of the REAL trial are the first to demonstrate enhanced oncological outcomes following RAS. However, findings remain inconsistent due to methodological heterogeneity, the absence of patient stratification, and limited data on long-term survival and cost-effectiveness. The available evidence indicates that RAS may offer advantages in selected patient populations, particularly for anatomically complex procedures. Yet, its overall utility remains uncertain. Future studies should emphasize high-quality randomized trials, stratified subgroup analyses, and standardized economic evaluations to better define the role of RAS in colorectal surgery. Full article

Background: Robotic deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) flap surgery is a technique used for autologous breast reconstruction to maintain the integrity of the rectus abdominis muscle while also utilizing robotic assistance for flap harvest. This study assesses postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing robotic DIEP flap reconstruction through the measurement of postoperative pain, narcotics use, and antiemetic usage. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for patients undergoing robotic DIEP flap breast reconstruction between March 2024 and March 2025. Postoperative pain scores (1–10 scale), narcotics usage (measured in oral morphine equivalents), antiemetic usage, and complications were recorded. Patient outcomes were compared to a control group of 40 patients who had undergone abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction. Results: Overall, 14 patients underwent robotic DIEP flap breast reconstruction, representing 24 breasts. The average patient age was 56.5 (range: 30–73). Ten patients underwent bilateral breast reconstruction, and four underwent unilateral breast reconstruction. The average length of stay postoperatively was 4.86 days (±1.23 days), and the return of bowel function occurred in 1.29 days (±0.47 days). No patients experienced an unplanned return to the OR or flap failure. Average pain scores on postoperative day 1 (POD1), 2 (POD2), and 3 (POD3) were 4.0 (±0.6), 3.4 (±0.6), and 2.93 (±0.5), respectively. Average antiemetic usage totalled 1.25 doses (±0.25). Average daily OME use was 27.7 (±5.0) for POD1, 25.96 (±6.3) for POD2, and 21.23 (±7.11) for POD3. This averaged to a total hospital OME use of 74.9 (±15.7) per patient. Patients undergoing robotic DIEP flap reconstruction required a significantly lower narcotics dosage, as well as a lower antiemetic dosage, during the first three days postoperatively compared to the control abdominal free flap group. Average pain scores in the robotic DIEP flap reconstruction patient group were also significantly decreased, specifically in POD2 and POD3. Conclusions: The robotic DIEP flap offers advantages in autologous breast reconstruction compared to other abdominal free flap reconstructive methods. In this limited retrospective study, the use of the robotic DIEP flap lowers chances of flap failure and complications, while also improving narcotics use, antiemetic use, and postoperative pain. Full article

Background: Iatrogenic nerve injuries (NIs) are an under-recognized complication of urological surgery. Though less common than vascular or organ damage, they may cause lasting sensory and motor deficits, significantly affecting patients’ quality of life. With increasing complexity in pelvic procedures, a consolidated understanding of nerve injuries is essential. Purpose: This review aims to synthesize current knowledge regarding peripheral and autonomic NIs in urological surgery, highlighting mechanisms of injury, associated procedures, preventative strategies, and treatment options. Scope: Focused on common urological interventions such as radical prostatectomy, cystectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, and reconstructive techniques, the review explores injuries from positional compression, traction, and intraoperative transection to their surgical management. Key Findings: The review categorizes nerve injuries into crush and transection types and details intraoperative signs and repair techniques. Skeletonization of nerves, avoidance of energy devices near neural structures, and prompt end-to-end anastomosis using 7-0 polypropylene are central to management. Adoption of novel sutureless nerve coaptation devices have also been described with promising outcomes. Early repair offers a better prognosis. New intraoperative technologies like NeuroSAFE during robotic-assisted procedures may enhance nerve preservation. Conclusion: Iatrogenic NIs, although rare, are clinically significant and often preventable. Prompt intraoperative recognition and repair are critical. Further research is warranted to develop standardized preventative protocols and enhance intraoperative nerve monitoring. A multidisciplinary approach, extended across surgical specialties, could improve outcomes and guide timely treatment of nerve injuries. Full article

Background: This study was designed to evaluate and contrast the surgical outcomes between coaxial robotic single-site myomectomy (RSSM) performed using the da Vinci Xi system and da Vinci SP system. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 81 women who underwent coaxial RSSM and 108 women who underwent myomectomy with the da Vinci SP system between October 2020 and January 2024. Propensity score matching was performed based on myoma count, the dominant myoma’s maximum diameter, and the myoma type according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification. Patient characteristics and surgical outcomes were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Results: Compared to the SP group, the coaxial RSSM group showed significantly lower estimated blood loss (102.33 ± 61.01 vs. 203.98 ± 163.15 mL, p < 0.001), shorter operative time (91.22 ± 18.25 vs. 148.69 ± 45.62 min, p < 0.001), and smaller hemoglobin decrement (1.69 ± 0.93 vs. 2.85 ± 1.30, p < 0.001). However, hospital stay was shorter in the SP group than in the coaxial group (2.06 ± 0.24 vs. 4.07 ± 0.76 days, p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative complications, including ileus, fever, or wound dehiscence. Additional comparisons using cases performed by four different surgeons yielded results consistent with the one-to-one surgeon comparison. Conclusions: Coaxial RSSM was associated with a shorter operative time and lower blood loss compared to SP myomectomy. A prospective study is warranted to validate and further compare the surgical outcomes of the two techniques. Full article

Background: While there is an abundance of comparative studies on open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomies (RDPs) available in the literature, direct comparisons between RDP and hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (HALDP) are limited. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of RDPs in comparison to HALDPs in the treatment of pancreatic lesions. Methods: This study reviewed 97 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy at Carmel Medical Center between 2008 and 2024. After excluding 40 patients (24 open and 16 pure laparoscopic resections), the final cohort comprised 57 patients: 20 RDPs and 37 HALDPs. The primary outcomes included peri-operative parameters, while secondary outcomes encompassed 90-day morbidity and mortality. Results: RDPs led to significantly longer operative times (3.9 vs. 2.5 h, p < 0.001) but resulted in shorter hospital stays (4.7 vs. 5.8 days, p = 0.02) and a higher number of harvested lymph nodes (11 vs. 5.4, p = 0.01). While clinically significant pancreatic fistula rates were numerically higher in the RDP group (35% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.18), this difference was not statistically significant. Overall, complication rates were comparable (55% vs. 43.2%, p = 0.39). Severe morbidity (Clavien–Dindo ≥ IIIa) was absent in the RDP group compared to 8% in the HALDP group (p = 0.04). No 90-day mortality was observed in either group. Conclusions: This study indicates that although RDP involves longer operative times, it may provide certain advantages for patients, such as shorter hospital stays, better lymph node retrieval, and a notable decrease in postoperative morbidity when compared to HALDP. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these results and to determine the most effective surgical approach for distal pancreatectomy. Full article

Background/Objectives: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has become the primary approach for treating bladder cancer, replacing the traditional open procedure. The robotic approach, when combined with ureterocutaneostomy (UCS), offers significant advantages for octogenarians, who are at increased risk for perioperative complications. Methods: This observational, prospective, multicenter analysis is based on data from the Italian Radical Cystectomy Registry (RIC), collected from January 2017 to June 2020 across 28 major urological centers in Italy. We analyzed consecutive male and female patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC) and urinary diversion via the open, laparoscopic, or robot-assisted technique. Inclusion criteria: patients aged 80 years or older, with a WHO Performance Status (PS) of 2–3, an American Society of Anesthesiologist score ≥3, a Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 4, and a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 mL/min. Results: A total of 128 consecutive patients were included: 41 underwent RARC with UCS (Group 1), 65 open RC (ORC) with UCS (Group 2), and 22 laparoscopic RC (LRC) with UCS (Group 3). The cystectomy operative time was longer in robotic surgeries, while the lymph node dissection time was shorter. RARC with UCS showed statistically significant advantages in terms of lower median estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion rate, and length of hospital stay (LOS) compared to open and laparoscopic procedures. Intra- and postoperative complications were also lower in the RARC groups. Conclusions: Robotic cystectomy in high-volume referral centers (≥20 cystectomies per year) provides the best outcome for fragile patients. Beyond addressing the baseline pathology, RARC with UCS may represent a leading option, offering oncological control while reducing complications in this vulnerable age group. Full article

Background and Objectives: To evaluate the feasibility and clinical outcomes of a novel non-mesh robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy (RSC) using autologous round ligament (ARL) grafts in patients with pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 92 patients who underwent non-mesh RSC with ARL grafts at Kagoshima University Hospital between August 2020 and June 2024. All patients met the inclusion criteria for symptomatic POP-Q stage II or higher and elected to undergo non-mesh RSC. The procedures were performed using the da Vinci^® Xi or the hinotori™ Surgical Robot System. The clinical characteristics, operative data, complications, and recurrence rates were analyzed. Results: ARL harvesting was feasible in all patients, and the non-mesh RSC procedure was completed without conversion to open surgery or any intraoperative complications. The median operative time was 251 min, and the median blood loss was 30 mL. Postoperative complications of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 occurred in five patients (5%), all of whom developed pelvic infections. De novo stress urinary incontinence was observed in one patient (1%). POP recurrence occurred in seven patients (8%) during a median follow-up of 3 months (range, 3–18 months), all of whom presented with cystocele. Five patients underwent reoperation, and two were managed conservatively. All patients experienced postoperative symptomatic improvement. A higher BMI and advanced POP-Q stage were significant predictors of recurrence. Conclusions: This is the first report of non-mesh RSC using an ARL graft. The procedure is feasible and effective, avoids the use of synthetic mesh, and offers short-term outcomes comparable to those of mesh-based RSC. ARL-based RSC represents a promising alternative, especially for patients at risk of mesh-related complications. Long-term follow-up is required to confirm durability. Full article

Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most commonly performed surgical procedures worldwide, with over 20 million cases annually. The evolution of hernia surgery has transitioned from tension-based techniques to tension-free approaches, significantly reducing recurrence rates. This review explores the history, advancements, and current trends in minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair, focusing on laparoscopic techniques such as transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), totally extraperitoneal (TEP), single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), and robotic-assisted repair. The importance of prosthetic meshes is emphasized, detailing their mechanical properties, pore size, weight classifications, and biocompatibility. Additionally, various mesh fixation methods—including tacks, sutures, and glues—are analyzed, with a discussion on their impact on postoperative complications such as chronic pain, adhesions, and infection risk. The debate between TAPP and TEP techniques is examined, highlighting the ongoing quest to determine the most effective approach. Emerging advancements, including drug-loaded meshes and dual-layered prosthetics, aim to improve integration and reduce complications. Despite significant progress, no universally superior technique or mesh exists, underscoring the need for individualized surgical approaches. Future research should focus on optimizing materials, refining fixation strategies, and enhancing patient outcomes in minimally invasive hernia repair. Full article

Background/Objectives: The aim of this case series is to evaluate the outcomes and safety of video-assisted mastectomy, illustrating the harmonious collaboration of oncologic and plastic surgery. This novel minimally invasive technique allows immediate prosthetic reconstruction and represents a cost-effective alternative to robotic breast surgery. Methods: Video-assisted, single-port nipple-sparing mastectomies were performed in patients with small to medium-sized breasts, followed by immediate direct-to-implant reconstruction with either prepectoral or dual plane implant placement. The patients’ electronic medical records were analyzed, including demographic characteristics, operative times and histopathology reports. Results: A total of 18 patients underwent successful video-assisted mastectomy, without conversion to traditional open procedure. Fifteen of the operations were risk-reducing mastectomies. Twelve patients had complementary procedures performed concurrently on the previously operated contralateral breast (delayed reconstruction/expander-to-implant exchange). Moreover, three patients benefited from additional minimally invasive techniques during the same surgery (prophylactic laparoscopic hysterectomy). Immediate breast reconstruction with polyurethane or microtextured breast implants up to 450 cc was performed, with satisfactory aesthetic outcomes and no cancer recurrences at 6 to 12 months postoperative follow-up. Early complications included transient hypercapnia, areolar congestion and cellulitis. No skin necrosis or implant-related complications were reported. The most frequently encountered late issues were contour irregularities. Conclusions: Video-assisted mastectomy facilitates the safe removal of proven pathologic or healthy breast tissue with minimal damage to the breast’s skin envelope, facilitating single-stage breast reconstruction. Full article

Background/Objectives: The potential advantages of robotic assistance in spinal procedures are a growing area of interest, and patient perception plays a key role in its broader acceptance. However, public perception of robotic surgery in spinal operations remains unexplored. This study aims to assess the general public’s perceptions, expectations, and concerns regarding robot-assisted spine surgery. Methods: In the fall of 2024, a questionnaire was distributed to attendees at a public open day at the Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, where the Globus ExcelsiusGPS™ spine surgery robot was demonstrated live on a mannequin. The 15-item questionnaire assessed demographic data, prior knowledge of medical robots, mental representations of surgical robots, expectations, and emotions after witnessing the demonstration. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square, Wilcoxon, McNemar tests, and logistic regression analysis. Results: A total of 109 questionnaires were collected. Most participants were female (64.4%) and had no direct experience with spinal pathology (79.8%). While 87.2% were aware of robotic surgery in general, only 65.1% specifically knew about its use in spine surgery. After witnessing the live demonstration, 81.9% felt reassured by the robot′s presence in surgery, compared to 61.3% before the demonstration (p = 0.007). Preference for robot-assisted surgery increased from 50.5% to 64.5% (p < 0.001). Notably, individuals with back-related issues showed greater confidence in the robot’s capabilities (p = 0.032). Conclusions: The general public perceives robotic spine surgery positively, viewing it as faster, more precise, and capable of performing tasks not readily performed by humans. The study highlights the importance of live demonstrations in enhancing trust and acceptance of robotic systems. Its findings have economic implications, as patients may be more likely to choose hospitals offering robot-assisted spine surgery. However, it is essential to also acknowledge alternative methods, such as computer-assisted navigation, which has demonstrated efficacy in spine surgery. Full article

Sensorineural hearing loss occurs when cochlear hair cells fail to convert mechanical sound waves into electrical signals transmitted via the auditory nerve. Cochlear implants (CIs) restore hearing by directly stimulating the auditory nerve with electrical impulses, often while preserving residual hearing. Over the past two decades, robotic-assisted techniques in otologic surgery have gained prominence for improving precision and safety. Robotic systems support critical procedures such as mastoidectomy, cochleostomy drilling, and electrode array (EA) insertion. These technologies aim to minimize trauma and enhance hearing preservation. Despite the outpatient nature of most CI surgeries, surgeons still face challenges, including anatomical complexity, imaging demands, and rising costs. Robotic systems help address these issues by streamlining workflows, reducing variability, and improving electrode placement accuracy. This review evaluates robotic systems developed for cochlear implantation, focusing on their design, surgical integration, and clinical outcomes. This review concludes that robotic systems offer low insertion speed, which leads to reduced insertion forces and lower intracochlear pressure. However, their impact on trauma, long-term hearing preservation, and speech outcome remains uncertain. Further research is needed to assess clinical durability, cost-effectiveness, and patient-reported outcomes. Full article