Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (18)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = robot-assisted microsurgery

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 254 KB  
Review
Robotic Horizons in Plastic Surgery: A Look Toward the Future
by Ali Foroutan, Diwakar Phuyal, Georgia Babb, Julia Ting, Ghazal Mashhadiagha, Niayesh Najafi, Risal Djohan, Sarah N. Bishop and Graham S. Schwarz
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(2), 602; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020602 - 12 Jan 2026
Viewed by 333
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Robotic technology has transformed several surgical specialties, offering enhanced precision, visualization, and dexterity. In plastic and reconstructive surgery, robotic systems are increasingly utilized across a range of procedures, though their applications remain in early development. Methods: A review of the literature was [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Robotic technology has transformed several surgical specialties, offering enhanced precision, visualization, and dexterity. In plastic and reconstructive surgery, robotic systems are increasingly utilized across a range of procedures, though their applications remain in early development. Methods: A review of the literature was performed to identify studies reporting robot-assisted procedures in plastic and reconstructive surgery. The literature was synthesized thematically to characterize current procedural applications, emerging technologies, and areas of active clinical investigation. Results: Robotic systems have been reported in a broad range of plastic and reconstructive procedures, including flap harvest, microsurgery, breast reconstruction, craniofacial and head and neck reconstruction, esthetic surgery, and gender-affirming surgery. The existing studies primarily consist of case series and case reports with substantial variability in reported indications, techniques, and technological platforms. Comparative clinical outcomes and long-term data are limited. Conclusions: Robot-assisted reconstruction continues to expand across multiple procedural domains. However, current evidence remains largely descriptive, underscoring the need for standardized reporting and prospective studies to better define clinical value, safety, and appropriate indications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plastic Surgery: Challenges and Future Directions)
17 pages, 524 KB  
Review
Redefining Reconstruction: Technological Innovations in Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction
by Nicole E. Speck and Jian Farhadi
Cancers 2025, 17(23), 3739; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17233739 - 22 Nov 2025
Viewed by 815
Abstract
Background: Microsurgical breast reconstruction is advancing rapidly with the integration of innovative technologies that enhance surgical precision, safety, and outcomes. This narrative review highlights recent developments across four key phases: flap planning, flap harvest, microvascular anastomosis, and flap monitoring. Methods: To [...] Read more.
Background: Microsurgical breast reconstruction is advancing rapidly with the integration of innovative technologies that enhance surgical precision, safety, and outcomes. This narrative review highlights recent developments across four key phases: flap planning, flap harvest, microvascular anastomosis, and flap monitoring. Methods: To identify the most updated and relevant data, all content on «Aesthetic and Reconstructive Breast Surgery Network» (ARBS Network, Copyright 2025 Mark Allen Group, United Kingdom) was screened regarding new technology. The contributions were grouped into one of four key phases. More references related to the content viewed were then searched on the electronic database MEDLINE (Bethesda, MD: U.S. National Library of Medicine). Results: 24 contributions regarding new technology were identified on ARBS Network. Of these, 17 were relevant for this paper. Preoperative tools such as CT angiography and AI-based perforator mapping optimize surgical planning and execution. Robotic-assisted or endoscopic techniques for deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap harvest enable minimally invasive dissection with reduced donor-site morbidity and improved muscle preservation. Robotic microsurgery, particularly with the MUSA and Symani® Surgical System, allows for precise, tremor-free suturing of submillimeter vessels. Indocyanine green (ICG) angiography remains the gold standard for intraoperative perfusion evaluation. Postoperative flap surveillance is crucial for detecting vascular compromise early. Devices such as the Cook-Swartz Doppler probe and flow couplers offer continuous monitoring. Wireless oximetry systems like ViOptix® provide non-invasive, real-time perfusion data and support remote monitoring. Conclusions: Collectively, these innovations are transforming microsurgical breast reconstruction by increasing efficiency, consistency, and outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1899 KB  
Case Report
Ruptured Posterior Inferior Cerebellar Artery Aneurysms: Integrating Microsurgical Expertise, Endovascular Challenges, and AI-Driven Risk Assessment
by Matei Șerban, Corneliu Toader and Răzvan-Adrian Covache-Busuioc
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(15), 5374; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14155374 - 30 Jul 2025
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2295
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysms are one of the most difficult cerebrovascular lesions to treat and account for 0.5–3% of all intracranial aneurysms. They have deep anatomical locations, broad-neck configurations, high perforator density, and a close association with the brainstem, which [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Posterior inferior cerebellar artery (PICA) aneurysms are one of the most difficult cerebrovascular lesions to treat and account for 0.5–3% of all intracranial aneurysms. They have deep anatomical locations, broad-neck configurations, high perforator density, and a close association with the brainstem, which creates considerable technical challenges for either microsurgical or endovascular treatment. Despite its acceptance as the standard of care for most posterior circulation aneurysms, PICA aneurysms are often associated with flow diversion using a coil or flow diversion due to incomplete occlusions, parent vessel compromise and high rate of recurrence. This case aims to describe the utility of microsurgical clipping as a durable and definitive option demonstrating the value of tailored surgical planning, preservation of anatomy and ancillary technologies for protecting a genuine outcome in ruptured PICA aneurysms. Methods: A 66-year-old male was evaluated for an acute subarachnoid hemorrhage from a ruptured and broad-necked fusiform left PICA aneurysm at the vertebra–PICA junction. Endovascular therapy was not an option due to morphology and the center of the recurrence; therefore, a microsurgical approach was essential. A far-lateral craniotomy with a partial C1 laminectomy was carried out for proximal vascular control, with careful dissection of the perforating arteries and precise clip application for the complete exclusion of the aneurysm whilst preserving distal PICA flow. Results: Post-operative imaging demonstrated the complete obliteration of the aneurysm with unchanged cerebrovascular flow dynamics. The patient had progressive neurological recovery with no new cranial nerve deficits or ischemic complications. Long-term follow-up demonstrated stable aneurysm exclusion and full functional independence emphasizing the sustainability of microsurgical intervention in challenging PICA aneurysms. Conclusions: This case intends to highlight the current and evolving role of microsurgical practice for treating posterior circulation aneurysms, particularly at a time when endovascular alternatives are limited by anatomy and hemodynamics. Advances in artificial intelligence cerebral aneurysm rupture prediction, high-resolution vessel wall imaging, robotic-assisted microsurgery and new generation flow-modifying implants have the potential to revolutionize treatment paradigms by embedding precision medicine principles into aneurysm management. While the discipline of cerebrovascular surgery is expanding, it can be combined together with microsurgery, endovascular technologies and computational knowledge to ensure individualized, durable, and minimally invasive treatment options for high-risk PICA aneurysms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neurovascular Diseases: Clinical Advances and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 534 KB  
Systematic Review
Evaluating the Clinical Utility of Robotic Systems in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review
by Ishith Seth, Kaiyang Lim, Edmond Chang, Warren M. Rozen and Sally Kiu-Huen Ng
Sensors 2025, 25(10), 3238; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25103238 - 21 May 2025
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4140
Abstract
Background: Robotic surgical systems offer enhanced precision, motion scaling, tremor filtration, and visualization, making them highly suitable for the complex anatomical demands of plastic and reconstructive surgery. While widely implemented in other specialties, their integration in plastic surgery remains limited. This systematic [...] Read more.
Background: Robotic surgical systems offer enhanced precision, motion scaling, tremor filtration, and visualization, making them highly suitable for the complex anatomical demands of plastic and reconstructive surgery. While widely implemented in other specialties, their integration in plastic surgery remains limited. This systematic review evaluates the clinical applications, outcomes, and limitations of robotic-assisted techniques in plastic and reconstructive procedures. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies published between January 1980 and March 2025. Clinical studies reporting robotic applications in plastic surgery were included, while cadaveric, animal, and non-English studies were excluded. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed using Covidence and validated tools including the CARE checklist, NOS, GRADE, and SYRCLE. A total of 1428 studies were screened, and 31 met the inclusion criteria. Results: Robotic systems were primarily applied in microsurgery (n = 16), breast reconstruction (n = 8), and craniofacial/aesthetic surgery (n = 7). Common platforms included the Symani Surgical System, Da Vinci systems, and ARTAS. Robotic-assisted approaches improved precision, aesthetic outcomes, flap survival, and patient satisfaction, particularly in procedures involving lymphaticovenous anastomosis and nipple-sparing mastectomy. However, challenges included steep learning curves, longer operative times, high equipment costs, and the lack of haptic feedback. Quality assessment rated all studies as moderate. Conclusions: Robotic-assisted surgery demonstrates considerable potential in enhancing plastic and reconstructive outcomes. As systems become more compact, cost-effective, and integrated with AI and biomimetic technologies, their broader adoption is anticipated. Further high-quality studies are needed to optimize these systems and support widespread clinical implementation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advance in Sensors Technology for Medical Robotics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2700 KB  
Article
Robot-Assisted Microsurgery Has a Steeper Learning Curve in Microsurgical Novices
by Felix Struebing, Jonathan Weigel, Emre Gazyakan, Laura Cosima Siegwart, Charlotte Holup, Ulrich Kneser and Arne Hendrik Boecker
Life 2025, 15(5), 763; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15050763 - 9 May 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1623
Abstract
Introduction: Mastering microsurgery requires advanced fine motor skills, hand–eye coordination, and precision, making it challenging for novices. Robot-assisted microsurgery offers benefits, such as eliminating physiological tremors and enhancing precision through motion scaling, which may potentially make learning microsurgical skills easier. Materials and Methods: [...] Read more.
Introduction: Mastering microsurgery requires advanced fine motor skills, hand–eye coordination, and precision, making it challenging for novices. Robot-assisted microsurgery offers benefits, such as eliminating physiological tremors and enhancing precision through motion scaling, which may potentially make learning microsurgical skills easier. Materials and Methods: Sixteen medical students without prior microsurgical experience performed 160 anastomoses in a synthetic model. The students were randomly assigned into two cohorts, one starting with the conventional technique (HR group) and one with robotic assistance (RH group) using the Symani surgical system. Results: Both cohorts showed a reduction in procedural time and improvement in SAMS scores over successive attempts, with robotic anastomoses demonstrating a 48.2% decrease in time and a 54.6% increase in SAMS scores. The decreases were significantly larger than the RH group (p < 0.05). The quality of the final anastomoses was comparable in both groups (p > 0.05). Discussion: This study demonstrated a steep preclinical learning curve for robot-assisted microsurgery (RAMS) among novices in a synthetic, preclinical model. No significant differences in SAMS scores between robotic and manual techniques after ten anastomoses. Robot-assisted microsurgery required more time per anastomosis, but the results suggest that experience with RAMS may aid in manual skill acquisition. The study indicates that further exploration into the sequencing of robotic and manual training could be valuable, especially in designing structured microsurgical curricula. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 2079 KB  
Review
From Open, Laparoscopic, or Computerized Surgical Interventions to the Prospects of Image-Guided Involvement
by Adel Razek
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(9), 4826; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15094826 - 26 Apr 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1716
Abstract
This review aims to place open, laparoscopic, computerized (robotic), and image-guided robotic surgical interventions in the context of complex medical surgeries, taking into account patient well-being, staff effort, and task reliability. It deduces the specificities of each technique and subsequently focuses on image-guided [...] Read more.
This review aims to place open, laparoscopic, computerized (robotic), and image-guided robotic surgical interventions in the context of complex medical surgeries, taking into account patient well-being, staff effort, and task reliability. It deduces the specificities of each technique and subsequently focuses on image-guided interventions and their practice in staff training, preparation, and implementation of a possible autonomous intervention. These complex interventions are intended to be minimally invasive (MI), precise, and safe therapies. The accuracy of robotic positioning could be improved by reductions in complexity and uncertainty involved in the intervention procedure. These can be achieved by matching the real controlled procedure and its virtual replica. The contribution discusses considerations for staff training and/or the planning of surgical interventions using real and virtual phantoms, and the use of augmented matched digital twins (DTs) for real interventions. This paper successively approaches open, laparoscopic and robotic surgeries, image-guided robotic interventions, the control and DT monitoring of MRI-assisted interventions, MRI field ruling equations and MRI compatibility, DT monitoring involvements in surgical interventions, and it ends with a discussion and main conclusions. The different topics presented in this article, although explicit, are reinforced by examples from the literature to facilitate a deeper understanding. The outcome of this review highlights the importance of robotic imaging-assisted procedures involving MI, nonionizing, and precise interventions. It also illustrates the potential of DTs combined with digital tools to offer an effective solution for the management of these interventions. The exploitation of such a suitable digital environment allows the planning, forecasting, prospecting, training, and execution, with staff in the loop, of surgical activities in general. This methodology allows for the precise consideration of specific anatomies, particularly in microsurgery and neurosurgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Science and Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

30 pages, 380 KB  
Review
The Transformative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Challenges and Opportunities
by Masab Mansoor and Andrew F. Ibrahim
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(8), 2698; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14082698 - 15 Apr 2025
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 5914
Abstract
Background/Objectives: This study comprehensively examines how artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are transforming clinical practice in plastic and reconstructive surgery across the entire patient care continuum, with the specific objective of identifying evidence-based applications, implementation challenges, and emerging opportunities that will shape the [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: This study comprehensively examines how artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are transforming clinical practice in plastic and reconstructive surgery across the entire patient care continuum, with the specific objective of identifying evidence-based applications, implementation challenges, and emerging opportunities that will shape the future of the specialty. Methods: A comprehensive narrative review was conducted analyzing the integration of AI technologies in plastic surgery, including preoperative planning, intraoperative applications, postoperative monitoring, and quality improvement. Challenges related to implementation, ethics, and regulatory frameworks were also examined, along with emerging technological trends that will shape future practice. Results: AI applications in plastic surgery demonstrate significant potential across multiple domains. In preoperative planning, AI enhances risk assessment, outcome prediction, and surgical simulation. Intraoperatively, AI-assisted robotics enables increased precision and technical capabilities beyond human limitations, particularly in microsurgery. Postoperatively, AI improves complication detection, pain management, and outcomes assessment. Despite these benefits, implementation faces challenges including data privacy concerns, algorithmic bias, liability questions, and the need for appropriate regulatory frameworks. Future directions include multimodal AI systems, federated learning approaches, and integration with extended reality and regenerative medicine technologies. Conclusions: The integration of AI into plastic surgery represents a significant opportunity to enhance surgical precision, improve outcome prediction, and expand the boundaries of what is surgically possible. However, successful implementation requires addressing ethical considerations and maintaining the human elements of surgical care. Plastic surgeons must actively engage with AI development to ensure these technologies address genuine clinical needs while aligning with the specialty’s core values of restoring form and function, alleviating suffering, and enhancing quality of life. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plastic Surgery: Challenges and Future Directions)
20 pages, 5249 KB  
Review
The Current State of the Art in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A Review and Modern/Future Approaches
by Min-Jeong Cho, Michael Schroeder, Jorge Flores Garcia, Abigail Royfman and Andrea Moreira
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(5), 1543; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051543 - 25 Feb 2025
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3078
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Modern breast reconstruction has undergone substantial evolution, with implant-based, pedicled autologous, and free autologous techniques. The purpose of this study is to review the current state of the art in free autologous breast reconstruction, highlighting advancements in the types of flaps, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Modern breast reconstruction has undergone substantial evolution, with implant-based, pedicled autologous, and free autologous techniques. The purpose of this study is to review the current state of the art in free autologous breast reconstruction, highlighting advancements in the types of flaps, donor site selection, techniques, and functional restoration. Methods: A literature review was conducted using PubMed to capture studies related to well-known free flaps that are used for breast reconstruction. Studies for each flap type were reviewed and sorted for inclusion into one of six categories: (1) clinical outcomes, (2) comparison studies of alternative flaps, (3) preoperative planning, (4) flap classifications and perfusion zones, (5) technique descriptions, and (6) time and cost analyses. Results: The majority (77%) of articles included were written on various types of abdominally based free flaps, including TRAM, DIEP, and SIEA flaps. These studies indicated an evolution in technique over time to minimize donor site morbidity, improve patient-reported and functional outcomes, improve efficiency, and expand clinical indications. The remaining 23% of articles discussed alternative flap choices, including PAP, TUG, S/IGAP, and LAP flaps. Studies highlighted technical challenges and the evolution of techniques to make these flaps more accessible, as well as how to combine flaps to expand clinical indications. Conclusions: Autologous breast reconstruction has evolved significantly, with advancements in techniques such as robotic-assisted surgery, multi-flap reconstruction, bipedicled flaps, and neurotization. This review highlights the current best practices while acknowledging ongoing challenges and the potential for future innovations in microsurgery, nerve regeneration, and personalized medicine, which hold promise for further refining outcomes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 659 KB  
Systematic Review
Comparative Evaluation of Major Robotic Systems in Microanastomosis Procedures: A Systematic Review of Current Capabilities and Future Potential
by Delia Cannizzaro, Matteo Scalise, Chiara Zancanella, Stefano Paulli, Stefano Peron and Roberto Stefini
Brain Sci. 2024, 14(12), 1235; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14121235 - 9 Dec 2024
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 4172
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Robotic-assisted surgery has revolutionised modern medicine, enabling greater precision and control, particularly in microsurgical procedures. This systematic review evaluates the current state of robotic-assisted surgery across various specialties, focusing on four major robotic systems: Symani, Da Vinci, ZEUS, and MUSA. Methods: The [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Robotic-assisted surgery has revolutionised modern medicine, enabling greater precision and control, particularly in microsurgical procedures. This systematic review evaluates the current state of robotic-assisted surgery across various specialties, focusing on four major robotic systems: Symani, Da Vinci, ZEUS, and MUSA. Methods: The review systematically analyses the effectiveness of these systems in performing vascular, lymphatic, and nervous anastomoses, comparing key metrics such as procedure time, success rates, and learning curves against manual techniques. It includes 48 studies, highlighting the technological capabilities and limitations of these systems in direct comparisons. Results: Results indicate that while robotic procedures often take longer than manual methods, significant improvements in efficiency are observed as surgeons gain experience. Conclusions: Overall, this study provides insights into the future potential of robotic-assisted surgery and highlights areas that require further research. It ultimately aims to promote the application of robotic systems in cranial neurosurgery, with a particular focus on advancing neurovascular techniques, such as microsuturing for bypass procedures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Neurosurgery and Neuroanatomy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1716 KB  
Article
Hands-On Robotic Microsurgery: Robotic-Assisted Free Flap Reconstruction of the Upper Extremity
by Felix Struebing, Amir Khosrow Bigdeli, Arne Boecker, Jonathan Weigel, Ulrich Kneser and Emre Gazyakan
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(23), 7450; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13237450 - 6 Dec 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1699
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Robot-assisted microsurgery (RAMS) has been introduced into the field of plastic surgery in recent years. It potentially offers enhanced precision and control compared to traditional methods, which is crucial for complex microvascular tasks in free flap reconstructions. We aim to analyze [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Robot-assisted microsurgery (RAMS) has been introduced into the field of plastic surgery in recent years. It potentially offers enhanced precision and control compared to traditional methods, which is crucial for complex microvascular tasks in free flap reconstructions. We aim to analyze our experiences with robotic-assisted microsurgery in the field of upper extremity free flap reconstruction. Methods: This prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the Symani Surgical System for free flap reconstructions in 16 patients with upper extremity defects at our institution from February 2023 to March 2024. Operating times were compared to a matched, historical cohort. We collected data on surgical outcomes, operative times, and complication rates, following strict adherence to the Declaration of Helsinki. Results: Our cohort primarily involved male patients (81%) with defects mostly located on the hand (81%). The anterolateral thigh flap was the most commonly used free flap (14/16, 88%). The average operative time was 368 ± 89 min (range: 216–550 min). No complete or partial flap losses were observed, but one flap required revision surgery due to arterial thrombosis. Major complications occurred in 13% of the cases. The average anastomosis time was 31 ± 12 min (range: 20–35 min) for arterial end-to-end anastomoses and 33 ± 13 min (range: 20–60 min) for arterial end-to-side anastomoses. Venous anastomoses required, on average, 20 ± 6 min. Operating times were not significantly longer when compared to the historical cohort (p = 0.67). Conclusions: We were able to show comparable outcomes to conventional microsurgery, while requiring more time for the microsurgical anastomoses. The study highlights the need for larger, controlled trials to better understand the benefits and limitations of robotic assistance in microsurgical reconstruction of the upper extremity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 4271 KB  
Review
Advances in Modern Microsurgery
by Oliver C. Thamm, Johannes Eschborn, Ruth C. Schäfer and Jeremias Schmidt
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(17), 5284; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13175284 - 6 Sep 2024
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 4768
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Microsurgery employs techniques requiring optical magnification and specialized instruments to operate on small anatomical structures, including small vessels. These methods are integral to plastic surgery, enabling procedures such as free tissue transfer, nerve reconstruction, replantation, and lymphatic surgery. This paper explores [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Microsurgery employs techniques requiring optical magnification and specialized instruments to operate on small anatomical structures, including small vessels. These methods are integral to plastic surgery, enabling procedures such as free tissue transfer, nerve reconstruction, replantation, and lymphatic surgery. This paper explores the historical development, advancements, and current applications of microsurgery in plastic surgery. Methods: The databases MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Web of Science were selectively searched with the term “(((microsurgery) OR (advances)) OR (robotic)) OR (AI)) AND (((lymphatic surgery) OR (peripheral nerve surgery)) OR (allotransplantation))” and manually checked for relevance. Additionally, a supplementary search among the references of all publications included was performed. Articles were included that were published in English or German up to June 2024. Results: Modern microsurgical techniques have revolutionized plastic surgery, enabling precise tissue transfers, improved nerve reconstruction, and effective lymphedema treatments. The evolution of robotic-assisted surgery, with systems like da Vinci and MUSA, has enhanced precision and reduced operative times. Innovations in imaging, such as magnetic resonance (MR) lymphography and near-infrared fluorescence, have significantly improved surgical planning and outcomes. Conclusions: The continuous advancements in microsurgery, including supermicrosurgical techniques and robotic assistance, have significantly enhanced the capabilities and outcomes of plastic surgery. Future developments in AI and robotics promise further improvements in precision and efficiency, while new imaging modalities and surgical techniques expand the scope and success of microsurgical interventions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Plastic Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 35607 KB  
Article
A Lightweight and Affordable Wearable Haptic Controller for Robot-Assisted Microsurgery
by Xiaoqing Guo, Finn McFall, Peiyang Jiang, Jindong Liu, Nathan Lepora and Dandan Zhang
Sensors 2024, 24(9), 2676; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24092676 - 23 Apr 2024
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4198
Abstract
In robot-assisted microsurgery (RAMS), surgeons often face the challenge of operating with minimal feedback, particularly lacking in haptic feedback. However, most traditional desktop haptic devices have restricted operational areas and limited dexterity. This report describes a novel, lightweight, and low-budget wearable haptic controller [...] Read more.
In robot-assisted microsurgery (RAMS), surgeons often face the challenge of operating with minimal feedback, particularly lacking in haptic feedback. However, most traditional desktop haptic devices have restricted operational areas and limited dexterity. This report describes a novel, lightweight, and low-budget wearable haptic controller for teleoperated microsurgical robotic systems. We designed a wearable haptic interface entirely made using off-the-shelf material-PolyJet Photopolymer, fabricated using liquid and solid hybrid 3D co-printing technology. This interface was designed to resemble human soft tissues and can be wrapped around the fingertips, offering direct contact feedback to the operator. We also demonstrated that the device can be easily integrated with our motion tracking system for remote microsurgery. Two motion tracking methods, marker-based and marker-less, were compared in trajectory-tracking experiments at different depths to find the most effective motion tracking method for our RAMS system. The results indicate that within the 4 to 8 cm tracking range, the marker-based method achieved exceptional detection rates. Furthermore, the performance of three fusion algorithms was compared to establish the unscented Kalman filter as the most accurate and reliable. The effectiveness of the wearable haptic controller was evaluated through user studies focusing on the usefulness of haptic feedback. The results revealed that haptic feedback significantly enhances depth perception for operators during teleoperated RAMS. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 876 KB  
Article
Transoral Laser Microsurgery versus Robot-Assisted Surgery for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Tongue Base (Oncological and Functional Results)—A Retrospective GETTEC Multicenter Study
by Ioana Brudasca, Pierre Philouze, Sylvain Morinière, Benjamin Lallemant, Sébastien Vergez, Olivier Malard, Pierre-Eric Roux, Noémie Rossello, Caroline Payen and Philippe Céruse
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(13), 4210; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12134210 - 22 Jun 2023
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2318
Abstract
The base of the tongue (BOT) is the second most common site for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the oropharynx. There are currently no clear guidelines for the management of BOT SCC. Our main objective was to compare the oncological outcomes of two [...] Read more.
The base of the tongue (BOT) is the second most common site for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the oropharynx. There are currently no clear guidelines for the management of BOT SCC. Our main objective was to compare the oncological outcomes of two minimally invasive approaches, transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) and transoral robot-assisted surgery (TORS). This was a retrospective French GETTEC (Groupe d’Études des Tumeurs de la Tête et du Cou) multicenter study of patients with BOT SCC removed surgically either by TLM or TORS between 2005 and 2021. The study group included 16 patients treated by TLM and 38 by TORS, with median follow-up times of 14.4 and 37.2 months, respectively. The overall survival (OS) rates at 2 and 3 years were 67% in the TLM group and 90% at 2 years and 86% at 3 years in the TORS group (p = 0.42, p = 0.20). There was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) between the two techniques after 2 and 3 years. The tumors removed by TORS were significantly larger. Operative times were significantly shorter in the TLM group. There were no differences in feeding resumption; none of the patients in the TLM group required a tracheotomy. Postoperative hemorrhagic complication rates were similar in the two groups (12% for TLM and 13% for TORS). Both TORS and TLM showed encouraging oncological, functional, and safety results in BOT SCC even in recurrence or second primary cancer patients, without a technique being found superior in terms of OS or RFS. Tumors removed by TORS were larger without an increase in postoperative bleeding, extending the possibilities of transoral treatment. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 602 KB  
Review
Laryngeal Cancer Surgery: History and Current Indications of Transoral Laser Microsurgery and Transoral Robotic Surgery
by Stéphane Hans, Robin Baudouin, Marta P. Circiu, Florent Couineau, Quentin Lisan, Lise Crevier-Buchman and Jerome R. Lechien
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(19), 5769; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195769 - 29 Sep 2022
Cited by 26 | Viewed by 8418
Abstract
The development of transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) was an important step in the history of conservative laryngeal surgery. TLM reported comparable oncological outcomes and better functional postoperative and rehabilitation outcomes than open partial laryngectomy. TLM is currently considered as the standard surgical approach [...] Read more.
The development of transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) was an important step in the history of conservative laryngeal surgery. TLM reported comparable oncological outcomes and better functional postoperative and rehabilitation outcomes than open partial laryngectomy. TLM is currently considered as the standard surgical approach for early-stage laryngeal carcinoma. However, TLM has many limitations, including the limited view of the surgical field through the laryngoscope, exposure difficulties for some tumor locations, and a long learning curve. The development of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) appears to be an important issue to overcome these limitations. The current robotic technologies used in surgery benefited from the research of the U.S. Military and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in the 1970s and 1980s. The first application in humans started in the 2000s with the first robotic-assisted cholecystectomy in the US, performed by a surgeon located in France. The use of robots in otolaryngology occurred after the development of the Da Vinci system in digestive surgery, urology, and gynecology, and mainly concerns cT1-T2 and some selected cT3 oropharyngeal and supraglottic carcinomas. With the development of a new robotic system with smaller arms and instruments, TORS indications will probably evolve in the next few years, leading to better outcomes for laryngeal or hypopharyngeal carcinomas. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1686 KB  
Review
Robotic-Assisted Microsurgery and Its Future in Plastic Surgery
by Matthias M. Aitzetmüller, Marie-Luise Klietz, Alexander F. Dermietzel, Tobias Hirsch and Maximilian Kückelhaus
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(12), 3378; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11123378 - 13 Jun 2022
Cited by 47 | Viewed by 6913
Abstract
Within the last 20 years, robotic-assisted surgeries have been implemented as routine procedures in many surgical fields, except in plastic surgery. Although several case series report promising results, technical and economic aspects have prevented its translation into clinical routine. This review is based [...] Read more.
Within the last 20 years, robotic-assisted surgeries have been implemented as routine procedures in many surgical fields, except in plastic surgery. Although several case series report promising results, technical and economic aspects have prevented its translation into clinical routine. This review is based on a PubMed and Google Scholar database search, including case reports, case series, clinical and preclinical trials, as well as patents. Past, recent approaches, ongoing patents, as well as eight specific systems for robotic-assisted microsurgery and their potential to be translated into a clinical routine, are described. They may lay the ground for a novel field within plastic surgery. This review provides an overview of the emerging technologies and clinical and preclinical studies and discusses the potential of robotic assistance in the field of plastic surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Updates in Aesthetic and Reconstructive Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop