Search Results (293)

Background: Postoperative recurrence of sacrococcygeal chordomas presents significant clinical challenges due to unusual recurrence patterns. This study aimed to characterize these patterns of recurrence to inform improved adjuvant radiotherapy planning. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 31 patients with recurrent sacrococcygeal chordoma following surgery, assessing recurrence locations considering initial tumor extent, resection levels, and postoperative anatomical changes on MRI. In 18 patients, pre- and postoperative imaging enabled the spatial mapping of early recurrence origins relative to the initial tumor volume using isotropic expansions. The median initial gross tumor volume was 113 mL. Results: Recurrences were mostly multifocal and predominantly involved soft tissues (e.g., mesorectal/perirectal space (80.6%), piriformis and gluteal muscles (80.6% and 67.7%, respectively) and osseous structures, particularly the sacrum (87.1%)). The median time to recurrence was 15 months. The initial surgery was R0 in 17 patients (55%). The highest infiltrated sacral vertebra was S1 in 3%, S2 in 10%, S3 in 35%, S4 in 23%, S5 in 10%, and coccygeal in 19%. Anatomical changes post-resection, including rectal herniation into gluteal and subcutaneous tissues, significantly affected radiotherapy planning. Expansion of the initial tumor volume by 2 cm failed to encompass all recurrence origins in 72% of cases. A 5 cm expansion was required to achieve full coverage in 56% of patients, though 22% of recurrences still lay beyond this margin and the remaining were covered only partially. Conclusions: Recurrent sacrococcygeal chordomas exhibit complex, soft-tissue-dominant patterns and are influenced by significant anatomical displacement post-surgery. Standard target volume expansions are often insufficient to cover the predominantly multifocal recurrences. Full article

Colorectal surgery has undergone significant advances over the past few decades, driven by the evolution of minimally invasive techniques, particularly laparoscopy and robotics. While laparoscopy is widely recognized for its short-term benefits and oncological safety, the increasing adoption of robot-assisted surgery (RAS) has generated considerable debate regarding its clinical benefits, economic implications, and overall impact on patient outcomes. This narrative review synthesizes the existing evidence, highlighting the clinical and economic aspects of RAS in colorectal surgery, while exploring areas for future research. The findings suggest that RAS offers potential technical advantages, including increased precision, three-dimensional visualization, and improved ergonomics, particularly in anatomically complex scenarios such as low rectal resections. Still, its superiority over laparoscopy remains inconclusive and current evidence is mixed. For colon cancer, meta-analyses and analyses of large cohorts suggest lower conversion rates and faster recovery with RAS, although data are mostly retrospective and lack long-term oncological endpoints. In rectal cancer, emerging evidence from randomized controlled trials demonstrates improved short-term outcomes. Additionally, the recently published three-year results of the REAL trial are the first to demonstrate enhanced oncological outcomes following RAS. However, findings remain inconsistent due to methodological heterogeneity, the absence of patient stratification, and limited data on long-term survival and cost-effectiveness. The available evidence indicates that RAS may offer advantages in selected patient populations, particularly for anatomically complex procedures. Yet, its overall utility remains uncertain. Future studies should emphasize high-quality randomized trials, stratified subgroup analyses, and standardized economic evaluations to better define the role of RAS in colorectal surgery. Full article

Background: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has emerged as a promising strategy for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). By administering both chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and systemic chemotherapy (CHT) pre-surgery, TNT is associated with improved disease-free survival (DFS), reduced distant metastases, and higher pathological complete response (pCR) rates. Materials and Methods: This study included patients with LARC who received various TNT schedules: induction chemotherapy (iCHT), consolidation chemotherapy (cCHT), or a combination of both (sandwichCHT). We analyzed treatment adherence, toxicity, and pathological response. Local and distant disease recurrence, as well as survival outcomes, were also evaluated. Results: Between May 2021 and January 2025, 70 patients received TNT. Treatment included iCHT (41%), sandwichCHT (49%), and cCHT (10%). Most patients (94%) received long-course radiotherapy (LCRT). Overall, TNT was well tolerated, with grade 2 gastrointestinal toxicity during CRT being the most common frequent adverse event (33%). Disease progression during TNT was noted in five patients (7%); three of these patients were receiving chemotherapy, while two underwent surgical resection of the primary tumor. A watch-and-wait strategy was adopted for five patients (7%) following TNT. Surgical procedures performed included anterior resection (92%), abdominoperineal resection (7%), and local excision (1%). Pathological assessment revealed an overall pCR rate of 30%. With a median follow-up of 17 months, no patients experienced local recurrence. Post-surgery, 10 patients (17%) developed disease progression. The median DFS was 14.7 months. Five patients (7%) died during the follow-up period, with only one death attributed to causes other than disease progression. Conclusions: In this cohort of LARC patients, TNT demonstrated favorable tolerability and encouraging short-term efficacy. Full article

Objectives: The aim of the present study was to investigate the impact of postoperative morbidity on mid-term quality of life and patient-related outcome (PRO) parameters after colorectal surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Methods: Quality of life and perioperative data were prospectively collected from 99 adult patients treated for colorectal carcinoma—56 patients with colonic carcinoma and 43 with rectal carcinoma, all of whom underwent R0 colorectal resection, at the University Hospital Erlangen between 2018 and 2021. Quality of life data (EQL C29 and C30) were assessed before the start of treatment and one year after. Patients were grouped based on the presence or absence of postoperative morbidity, and their quality of life was compared between the two groups. Results: In the colonic carcinoma cohort, global quality of life and emotional functioning showed significant improvement from pre-treatment to the one-year follow-up (63 vs. 72, p = 0.012 and 63 vs. 76, p = 0.009, respectively). Among the symptom scales, five items improved, while two worsened. Patients who experienced postoperative morbidity (32% in the colonic carcinoma group) did not exhibit worse outcomes in functioning or symptom scales compared to those without morbidity (4 items improved and 1 worsened in the morbidity group vs. 3 improved and 1 worsened in the no-morbidity group). The rectal carcinoma cohort demonstrated a decline in quality of life from pre-treatment to the one-year follow-up. Two functioning scales worsened significantly (physical function: 89 vs. 83, p < 0.001; role function: 81 vs. 68, p = 0.009), and twelve symptom scales showed deterioration, with only two symptom scales improving. Postoperative morbidity (33% in the rectal carcinoma group) did not result in more pronounced impairments compared to those without morbidity. The morbidity group experienced 2 worsened and 0 improved items, while the no-morbidity group had 10 worsened and 1 improved item. Conclusions: Postoperative morbidity was not significantly associated with a worse quality of life at one-year follow-up after treatment of colorectal carcinomas, including colorectal resections, compared to patients who did not develop postoperative morbidity. Full article

Background: Systemic inflammatory markers have emerged as accessible and reproducible tools for oncologic risk stratification, yet their prognostic value in rectal cancer remains incompletely defined, particularly in acute surgical settings. This study aimed to assess six inflammation-based indices—NLR, PLR, MLR, SII, SIRI, and AISI—in relation to tumor stage, recurrence, and outcomes among patients undergoing emergency versus elective resection for rectal cancer. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 174 patients treated between 2018 and 2024. Pre-treatment blood counts were used to calculate inflammatory indices. Clinical and pathological parameters were correlated with biomarker levels using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: Pre-treatment inflammation markers were significantly elevated in patients requiring emergency surgery (e.g., NLR: 3.34 vs. 2.4, p = 0.001; PLR: 204.1 vs. 137.8, p < 0.001; SII: 1008 vs. 693, p = 0.007), reflecting advanced tumor biology and immune activation. Notably, these patients also had higher rates of stage IV disease (p = 0.029) and permanent stoma (p = 0.002). Post-treatment, recurrence was paradoxically associated with significantly lower levels of SII (p = 0.021), AISI (p = 0.036), and PLR (p = 0.003), suggesting a potential role for immune exhaustion rather than hyperinflammation in early relapse. Conclusions: Inflammatory indices provide valuable insights into both tumor local invasion and host immune status in rectal cancer. Their integration into perioperative assessment could improve prognostication, particularly in emergency presentations. Post-treatment suppression of these markers may identify patients at high risk for recurrence despite initial curative intent. Full article

Background: Rectal cancer management involves surgery, chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), and patient care strategies, all of which significantly affect health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Understanding these effects is critical for optimizing treatment protocols. This review aimed to systematically analyze the impact of rectal cancer treatment on HRQoL. Methods: Four databases, Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 2013 and December 2023. RCTs specifically focusing on rectal cancer treatments (surgical interventions, pre- and/or post-CT and/or RT, and patient care strategies) were included. An abstract review, data extraction, and a risk-of-bias assessment were independently conducted by two reviewers. Results: The 41 included studies comprised 9240 patients: 16 evaluated surgical interventions (3507 patients), 15 evaluated pre- and/or post-CT and/or RT protocols (5114 patients), and 10 focused on patient-care strategies (619 patients). Sphincter-sparing procedures were associated with better HRQoL than abdominoperineal resection, and rectal-sparing techniques were associated with better overall HRQoL than rectal resection. RT was associated with a poorer HRQoL. Continuity-of-care interventions improved HRQoL in ostomy patients, whereas transanal irrigation improved HRQoL after ostomy closure. Conclusions: This systematic review of RCTs underscores the importance of organ-sparing strategies, such as rectum-sparing approaches and continuity-of-care packages, in improving HRQoL in patients with rectal cancer. Although RT negatively affects HRQoL, treatment regimens should be individualized. Tailored organ-preservation approaches and structured follow-up care are essential for optimizing HRQoL in patients with rectal cancer. Full article

Background/Objectives: Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is a promising treatment option for unresectable locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC). However, CIRT is contraindicated in cases where recurrent tumors are attached to the intestine. To address this limitation, we developed a novel treatment strategy involving curative-dose CIRT to recurrent tumors, including the adjacent intestine, without dose constraints, followed by surgical resection of the irradiated intestine. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of this approach. Methods: Patients were eligible for this study if the distance between the unresectable recurrent tumor and the adjacent intestines was less than 3 mm. Between 2019 and 2023, twelve patients were enrolled. CIRT was administered at curative doses of 70.4 or 73.6 Gy (relative biologic effectiveness (RBE)), including the adjacent intestines, without dose constraints. Surgical resection was not intended to excise the tumor itself, but was performed solely to remove the irradiated intestines. Irradiated intestine resection was planned within eight weeks after the completion of CIRT. Results: All patients completed the scheduled treatment course. The median interval between completing CIRT and surgery was 4 (3–8) weeks. No patients experienced acute AEs related to CIRT. Regarding late AEs, two patients developed Grade I sciatic neuralgia, and one patient developed Grade III neuralgia. We considered this symptom, which later resulted in a limp in his left leg, acceptable because this patient could ambulate with assistance. Clavien–Dindo Grade III postoperative complications occurred in one patient. The median follow-up duration was 40 (20–60) months. One patient was diagnosed with in-field recurrence, and three patients were diagnosed with out-of-field recurrence. These patients received reirradiation with CIRT. Four patients experienced lung recurrence, and one patient died from rectal-cancer-specific causes. Conclusions: This novel treatment strategy may provide favorable outcomes for patients with unresectable LRRC. This approach can be applied to the currently accepted indications for CIRT, and we believe that CIRT is a feasible treatment option for future patients. Full article

Background: The impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) on outcomes in real-world patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains uncertain. Methods: Consecutive patients with LARC (stage II/III) undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation before curative-intent surgery from 2005 to 2013 were identified in the Canadian Health Outcomes Research Database. The impact of AC on clinical outcomes, including disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS), was evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Results: A total of 1448 patients had sufficient data available to be included for analysis with 1085 (74.9%) receiving AC. Of AC patients, 40.5% received oxaliplatin-based treatments. With a median follow-up of 66.43 months, the 5-year DFS rate was 67.7% (95% CI: 64.5–70.1%) vs. 58.7% (95% CI: 52.8–64.2%) in the AC group and non-AC group, respectively (p < 0.001). The 5-year OS rate of the whole cohort was 74.3% (95% CI: 71.5–76.85%) while the 5-year OS rate of the AC group was 77.8% (95% CI: 74.7–80.6%) compared with 63.8% (95% CI: 57.9–69.2%) for the non-AC group (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, patients who received AC had improved DFS (HR 0.6, 95% CI: 0.49–0.73, p < 0.001) and OS (HR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.36–0.58, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This large multi-institutional database analysis supports the use of AC in real-world LARC patients treated with nCRT followed by surgical resection. Full article

Traditionally, the therapeutic approach to rectal cancer has involved neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection, and, in some cases, adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aims to present current advances and ongoing controversies in the management of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), with a particular focus on clarifying the role of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in contemporary treatment strategies. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review in Medline/PubMed using various keyword combinations, including “rectal cancer/neoplasia” and“therapy” or “neoadjuvant therapy” or “TNT”, and included articles published between 2015 and 2025. Results: The association of neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with preoperative systemic chemotherapy has led to the current concept of total neoadjuvant therapy. The advantages of preoperative chemotherapy include better patient compliance, a decrease in the rate of local recurrence and distant metastases via the early destruction of infra-clinical micrometastases, and higher rates of pathological complete response. All of these have led to the inclusion of this strategy in treatment guidelines for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Conclusions: However, the selection of patients with advanced rectal tumors for optimal therapy requires comprehensive imaging assessments, molecular and genetic testing, and a multidisciplinary team to determine the most appropriate total neoadjuvant therapy approach. Full article

Rectal cancer management necessitates a rigorous multidisciplinary strategy, emphasizing precise staging and detailed risk stratification to inform optimal therapeutic decision-making. Obtaining an accurate histological diagnosis before initiating treatment is essential. Comprehensive staging integrates clinical evaluation, thorough medical history analysis, assessment of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, and computed tomography (CT) imaging of the abdomen and thorax. High-resolution pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), utilizing dedicated rectal protocols, is critical for identifying recurrence risks and delineating precise anatomical relationships. Endoscopic ultrasound further refines staging accuracy by determining the tumor infiltration depth in early-stage cancers, while preoperative colonoscopy effectively identifies synchronous colorectal lesions. In early-stage rectal cancers (T1–T2, N0, and M0), radical surgical resection remains the standard of care, although transanal local excision can be selectively indicated for certain T1N0 tumors. In contrast, locally advanced rectal cancers (T3, T4, and N+) characterized by microsatellite stability or proficient mismatch repair are optimally managed with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), which combines chemoradiotherapy with oxaliplatin-based systemic chemotherapy. Additionally, tumors exhibiting high microsatellite instability or mismatch repair deficiency respond favorably to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The evaluation of tumor response following neoadjuvant therapy, utilizing MRI and endoscopic assessments, facilitates individualized treatment planning, including non-operative approaches for patients with confirmed complete clinical responses who comply with rigorous follow-up. Recent advancements in molecular characterization, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy highlight a significant evolution towards personalized medicine. The effective integration of these innovations requires enhanced interdisciplinary collaboration to improve patient prognosis and quality of life. Full article

Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant therapy and surgery for locally advanced rectal cancer is associated with improved prognosis. Accurately predicting who will achieve pCR could theoretically eliminate the need for surgery for these patients. We aimed to compare pCR and non-pCR rectal cancer patients following neoadjuvant therapy, searching for clinical predictors for pCR and comparing oncological outcomes between these groups. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent a curative-intent rectal resection between 2010 and 2020 for primary non-metastatic rectal cancer following neoadjuvant therapy. The cohort (263 patients) was divided into two groups according to the pathological results from surgery: the pCR group (53 patients) and the non-pCR group (210 patients). Results: The groups were similar in terms of baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, and staging, but tumors of the pCR group were significantly higher in the rectum (mean distance from the anal verge 7.92 cm versus 6.9 cm respectively, p = 0.04), and more of them were located at the posterior rectal wall (37.7% versus 24.3%, p = 0.049). Multivariate analysis found posterior location and tumor height to be significantly associated with pCR (OR 2.23, 95% CI 1.11–4.45, p = 0.023), (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03–1.27, p = 0.015). The 5-year overall survival was 95.6% in the pCR group compared with 87.5% in the non-pCR group (p = 0.09), and the 5-year disease-free survival was 92.7% versus 64.5%, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Tumor location at the posterior wall of the rectum and higher tumor location were found to be associated with pCR. Patients achieving pCR demonstrate improved prognosis compared with non-pCR patients. Full article

Background: Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) is a possible approach for rectal anterior resection (RAR). However, evidence supporting this technique remains limited. This study aims to evaluate the perioperative and oncological outcomes of HALS for RAR at a single tertiary oncology center. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using a prospectively maintained database. Patients with primary adenocarcinoma of the rectosigmoid junction and rectum who underwent HALS for RAR between 1 January 2013 and 31 December 2022 were included. All surgeries were performed by a dedicated colorectal team composed of three surgeons. Results: Among the 1911 surgeries for primary colorectal cancer performed, 469 met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 66 (57–74) years and 63% of the patients were male. Most tumors were cT3-4 (78.9%) and cN+ (71.2%), and neoadjuvant therapy was administered in 70.0% of cases. Low RAR was performed in 73.1% of cases, and an anastomosis was constructed in 95% of cases. The median operative time was 152 (135–180) min, and the conversion rate was 3.8%. Major morbidity occurred in 10.0% of cases, with 30-day and 90-day mortality rates of 0.9% and 1.3%, respectively. The overall anastomotic leak rate was 12.1%, with 9.0% early leaks and 3.1% late leaks. A complete/near-complete mesorectal excision was achieved in 89.6% of cases and an R0 resection in 96.2% of cases. With a median follow-up of 87 months, the locoregional recurrence rate was 2.5%, whereas the distant recurrence rate was 5.9%. The 5-year overall survival was 82.6%. Conclusions: When performed by experienced teams, HALS for RAR is safe and feasible and is associated with a short operative time, low conversion rate, minimal morbidity, and optimal oncologic performance. Full article

Sexual dysfunction following abdominal or pelvic surgery is a significant concern that impacts the quality of life (QoL) for both men and women. This paper explores the multifaceted challenges and re-educational strategies associated with post-surgical sexual dysfunction. It highlights the physical and psychological repercussions of surgeries such as hysterectomies, pelvic organ prolapse repairs, radical prostatectomies, and rectal cancer resections. These procedures often lead to complications like dyspareunia, erectile dysfunction, and altered body image, necessitating comprehensive re-educational approaches. The review emphasizes the importance of tailored interventions, including pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), biofeedback, manual therapy, and advanced techniques like botulinum toxin injections and sacral neuromodulation. For men, strategies such as phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5i), vacuum erection devices (VEDs), intracavernosal injections, and penile prostheses are explored for their efficacy in restoring erectile function. Psychological support, including cognitive–behavioral therapy and couples counseling, is underscored as essential to addressing emotional and relational aspects of recovery. A multidisciplinary approach involving physiatrists, urologists, gynecologists, physiotherapists, psychologists, and sexual health counselors is advocated for to optimize outcomes. Integrating physical therapy modalities, as well as psychological and relational therapies, into individual rehabilitation projects is crucial for improving sexual function and overall QoL post-surgery. Future research should focus on refining these established strategies and investigating the potential of innovative therapeutic modalities. Full article

Today, endoscopy plays a crucial role not only in the detection of precancerous and malignant colorectal lesions, but also in the treatment of even widespread adenomas and T1 early cancers. In addition to classic polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) using a snare, in recent years, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has become increasingly important. Marking, submucosal injection, circumferential incision of the mucosa around the lesion, tunneling, and submucosal dissection using a short diathermic knife facilitate the ‘en bloc’ resection of lesions larger than 3 cm, difficult to resect in one piece using a snare. Lesions with high-grade dysplasia or mucosal carcinoma are other good candidates aside from widespread adenomata with a high risk of recurrence after piecemeal resection. ESD allows R0 resection rates of more than 90% in specialized centers. Lesions of 20 cm have been removed ‘en bloc’ by expert endoscopists. ESD provides an optimal histopathologic yield and has a risk of recurrence as low as 3%. Endoscopic full-thickness resection using a special device (eFTRD) is another addition to the resection armamentarium. It is especially suitable for circumscribed lesions up to 2 cm in the middle and upper rectum. Endoscopic intermuscular dissection (EID) is a recent modification of ESD primarily in the rectum, including the inner, circular muscular layer into the resection specimen. In this way, it allows a histopathologic analysis of the entire submucosa beyond the mucosal and upper submucosal layer such as in ESD. This is especially important for T1 cancers invading the submucosa without any other risk factors of invasion. Full article

Background/Aim: Perineal, pelvic and urogenital reconstruction presents a challenge, not only due to defect size but also due to high morbidity resulting from surgery and post-operative complications. The purpose of this study is to review the surgical approach and evaluate the results regarding pelvic/perineal reconstruction after advanced tumor resection. Patients and Methods: The total number of patients was 34 (11 males, 23 females). The histology varied, including sixteen rectal-anal squamous cell carcinomas, five Buschke-Lowenstein tumors, four vulvar-vaginal carcinomas, four sacral chordomas, two cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas, two soft tissue sarcomas and a case of Paget’s disease. Most patients had previously been treated with colectomies and/or gynecological resections and received a full dose of radiotherapy. Reconstruction was performed with the following flaps: oblique/vertical rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap (ORAM/VRAM), gracilis myocutaneous flap, inferior gluteal artery perforator flap (IGAP), internal pudendal artery perforator flap (IPAP) and lotus petal flaps. Results: Most patients had a relatively uncomplicated post-operative course. Surgical site infection and wound dehiscence occurred more commonly with the thigh flaps rather than the abdominal flaps. However, the aggression and the frequent recurrences of these tumors had as a result, only 15 out of 34 patients achieved a five-year disease-free survival. Conclusions: Pelvic and perineal defects are usually massive and the use of myocutaneous flaps to eliminate the dead space is of paramount importance. Although these are mainly salvage operations with a low survival rate, they promote patients’ quality of life. A frequent challenge is the simultaneous achievement of tumor radical resection and pelvis functionality. Full article