Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (22)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = rectal brachytherapy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
12 pages, 955 KB  
Article
Single-Center Preliminary Experience Treating Endometrial Cancer Patients with Fiducial Markers
by Francesca Titone, Eugenia Moretti, Alice Poli, Marika Guernieri, Sarah Bassi, Claudio Foti, Martina Arcieri, Gianluca Vullo, Giuseppe Facondo, Marco Trovò, Pantaleo Greco, Gabriella Macchia, Giuseppe Vizzielli and Stefano Restaino
Life 2025, 15(8), 1218; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15081218 - 1 Aug 2025
Viewed by 830
Abstract
Purpose: To present the findings of our preliminary experience using daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) supported by implanted fiducial markers (FMs) in the radiotherapy of the vaginal cuff, in a cohort of post-surgery endometrial cancer patients. Methods: Patients with vaginal cuff cancer [...] Read more.
Purpose: To present the findings of our preliminary experience using daily image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) supported by implanted fiducial markers (FMs) in the radiotherapy of the vaginal cuff, in a cohort of post-surgery endometrial cancer patients. Methods: Patients with vaginal cuff cancer requiring adjuvant radiation with external beams were enrolled. Five patients underwent radiation therapy targeting the pelvic disease and positive lymph nodes, with doses of 50.4 Gy in twenty-eight fractions and a subsequent stereotactic boost on the vaginal vault at a dose of 5 Gy in a single fraction. One patient was administered 30 Gy in five fractions to the vaginal vault. These patients underwent external beam RT following the implantation of three 0.40 × 10 mm gold fiducial markers (FMs). Our IGRT strategy involved real-time 2D kV image-based monitoring of the fiducial markers during the treatment delivery as a surrogate of the vaginal cuff. To explore the potential role of FMs throughout the treatment process, we analyzed cine movies of the 2D kV-triggered images during delivery, as well as the image registration between pre- and post-treatment CBCT scans and the planning CT (pCT). Each CBCT used to trigger fraction delivery was segmented to define the rectum, bladder, and vaginal cuff. We calculated a standard metric to assess the similarity among the images (Dice index). Results: All the patients completed radiotherapy and experienced good tolerance without any reported acute or long-term toxicity. We did not observe any loss of FMs during or before treatment. A total of twenty CBCTs were analyzed across ten fractions. The observed trend showed a relatively emptier bladder compared to the simulation phase, with the bladder filling during the delivery. This resulted in a final median Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.90, indicating strong performance. The rectum reproducibility revealed greater variability, negatively affecting the quality of the delivery. Only in two patients, FMs showed intrafractional shift > 5 mm, probably associated with considerable rectal volume changes. Target coverage was preserved due to a safe CTV-to-PTV margin (10 mm). Conclusions: In our preliminary study, CBCT in combination with the use of fiducial markers to guide the delivery proved to be a feasible method for IGRT both before and during the treatment of post-operative gynecological cancer. In particular, this approach seems to be promising in selected patients to facilitate the use of SBRT instead of BRT (brachytherapy), thanks to margin reduction and adaptive strategies to optimize dose delivery while minimizing toxicity. A larger sample of patients is needed to confirm our results. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1047 KB  
Article
Patients with a Short Distance Between the Prostate and the Rectum Are Appropriate Candidates for Hydrogel Spacer Placement to Prevent Short-Term Rectal Hemorrhage After External-Beam Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer
by Shunsuke Owa, Takeshi Sasaki, Akito Taniguchi, Kazuki Omori, Taketomo Nishikawa, Momoko Kato, Shinichiro Higashi, Yusuke Sugino, Yutaka Toyomasu, Akinori Takada, Kouhei Nishikawa, Yoshihito Nomoto and Takahiro Inoue
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(7), 385; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32070385 - 3 Jul 2025
Viewed by 2088
Abstract
Radiation therapy, including external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy, is curative for localized prostate cancer. Hydrogel spacer (HS) placement between the rectum and prostate is popular for reducing radiation-related complications. Criteria to identify patients who benefit from HS placement would be clinically valuable. [...] Read more.
Radiation therapy, including external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and brachytherapy, is curative for localized prostate cancer. Hydrogel spacer (HS) placement between the rectum and prostate is popular for reducing radiation-related complications. Criteria to identify patients who benefit from HS placement would be clinically valuable. In a retrospective analysis of 430 patients with localized prostate cancer treated between November 2010 and March 2023 with ≥2 years of follow-up, we evaluated the incidence of rectal hemorrhage and its association with the median distance at the midpoint between the prostate and the rectum (mDPR) on pretreatment MRI. Rectal hemorrhage occurred in 6% of HS cases and 18% of non-HS cases (p < 0.001). Among 268 patients who received EBRT (±brachytherapy), the incidence was 9% with HS and 30% without HS (p < 0.001). In non-HS cases, the rate in patients with mDPR ≤ 1.62 mm was higher than in those with mDPR > 1.62 mm (24% vs. 12%, respectively; p = 0.04). In patients with EBRT and mDPR ≤ 1.62 mm, HS significantly reduced hemorrhage (9% vs. 39%, respectively; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified mDPR and HS as independent predictors of rectal hemorrhage (both p = 0.02). Thus, HS placement may be safely omitted in non-EBRT cases with mDPR ≥ 1.62 mm. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Genitourinary Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3238 KB  
Article
Dosimetric Comparison of VMAT Alone and VMAT with HDR Brachytherapy Boost Using Clinical and Biological Dose Models in Localized Prostate Cancer
by Manuel Guhlich, Olga Knaus, Arne Strauss, Laura Anna Fischer, Jann Fischer, Stephanie Bendrich, Sandra Donath, Leif Hendrik Dröge, Martin Leu, Stefan Rieken, Annemarie Uhlig, Markus Anton Schirmer and Andrea Hille
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(6), 360; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32060360 - 19 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1543
Abstract
Background: Combining external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) enables biologically effective dose escalation in prostate cancer. However, comparative evaluation of such regimens using radiobiological modeling remains limited. Methods: Dose regimens based on clinical practice were analyzed using α/β values of [...] Read more.
Background: Combining external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) enables biologically effective dose escalation in prostate cancer. However, comparative evaluation of such regimens using radiobiological modeling remains limited. Methods: Dose regimens based on clinical practice were analyzed using α/β values of 1.5 and 3 Gy for the prostate. Ten patients with available planning CT, pelvic MRI, and ultrasound-guided BT plans were retrospectively evaluated. Physical and biological dose distributions were recalculated for various EBRT and HDR-BT combinations. Biological effective dose (BED) values were determined for the prostate and organs at risk (OARs: anterior rectal wall, bladder base, urethra). Regimens yielding the highest ΔBED between prostate and OARs were considered most favorable. Results: All regimens met clinical dose constraints. The most favorable ΔBED profiles for bladder and rectum were observed with HDR-BT regimens (2 × 15 Gy) combined with either 23 × 2 Gy or 15 × 2.5 Gy EBRT, independent of the assumed α/β value. EBRT-only regimens achieved superior urethral sparing, while higher HDR doses led to increased urethral exposure. Conclusions: This study underscores the value of radiobiological modeling in differentiating and optimizing prostate cancer radiotherapy strategies. While the trade-offs between dose escalation and OAR sparing are clinically known, our biologically driven analysis provides a more quantitative foundation for selecting and tailoring combined EBRT/HDR-BT regimens in practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiotherapy for Genitourinary Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2057 KB  
Article
Patient-Reported Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life After Contact X-Ray Brachytherapy (CXB) in Organ-Preserving Management of Rectal Cancer
by Ngu Wah Than, D. Mark Pritchard, David M. Hughes, Carrie A. Duckworth, Muneeb Ul Haq, Thomas Cummings, Charlotte Jardine, Sarah Stead, Rajaram Sripadam and Arthur Sun Myint
Cancers 2025, 17(9), 1560; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17091560 - 3 May 2025
Viewed by 1048
Abstract
Background/Objectives: With recent advancements in rectal cancer management leading to longer patient survival, the impact of various treatment approaches on patients’ quality of life (QOL) becomes an important focus of attention. While QOL studies exist for watch-and-wait after (chemo)radiation with/without local excision, data [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: With recent advancements in rectal cancer management leading to longer patient survival, the impact of various treatment approaches on patients’ quality of life (QOL) becomes an important focus of attention. While QOL studies exist for watch-and-wait after (chemo)radiation with/without local excision, data on health-related QOL (HRQOL) outcomes after contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) remain limited. This study evaluated functional and HRQOL outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing CXB and (chemo)radiation over one year. Methods: This prospective observational study (enrolment January–October 2023) with one-year follow-up assessed functional and HRQOL outcomes after CXB and (chemo)radiation using EORTC-QLQ-CR29, HADS, and EQ-5D-3L questionnaires. Longitudinal analyses were conducted using linear mixed-effects models, incorporating both fixed and random effects, following data processing based on relevant scoring manuals. Results: QOL was assessed in 53 patients who attended our centre for CXB for various clinical indications, with 51, 47, and 42 remaining at the end of treatment, 6-month, and 12-month follow-ups, respectively. Overall, symptom and functional scores from EORTC-QLQ-CR29 remained stable throughout the follow-up period. Significant improvements were observed in abdominal pain, flatulence, urinary frequency, and body weight at 12 months. HADS and EQ-5D-3L scores remained stable, while EQ-VAS scores showed improvement, indicating a good overall quality of life following CXB treatment. Conclusions: CXB treatment combined with (chemo)radiation maintained stable HRQOL, with some improvements in symptoms and QOL noted during the subsequent year. These findings will help rectal cancer patients understand the benefits and limitations of CXB as a treatment option. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Tumors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 3095 KB  
Article
Long-Term Outcomes of Patients with Poor Prognostic Factors Following Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery (TEMS) for Early Rectal Cancer
by Muneeb Ul Haq, Khaled Noureldin, David Mark Pritchard, Arthur Sun Myint, Carrie A. Duckworth, Ngu Wah Than, David M. Hughes, Shakil Ahmed and Muhammad Ahsan Javed
Biomedicines 2025, 13(2), 521; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13020521 - 19 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1301
Abstract
Background: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is an organ-preserving approach for treatment of early rectal cancer (ERC). However, adverse histopathological features identified post-TEMS often necessitate adjuvant therapy. This study aims to compare the long-term oncological outcomes of patients who underwent TEMS and were offered [...] Read more.
Background: Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) is an organ-preserving approach for treatment of early rectal cancer (ERC). However, adverse histopathological features identified post-TEMS often necessitate adjuvant therapy. This study aims to compare the long-term oncological outcomes of patients who underwent TEMS and were offered adjuvant treatments with total mesorectal excision (TME), chemoradiotherapy (CRT), radiotherapy (RT), active surveillance, or dose escalation with contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB). Methods: This study included patients treated with TEMS for ERC between September 2012 and December 2022, with follow-up until December 2023. Patients with adverse histopathological features (extra-mural venous invasion, lympho-vascular invasion, R1 margins, tumour budding) were assigned to adjuvant treatments. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to mitigate selection bias. Results: Of the 117 patients, 24 underwent TME, 17 received CRT, 25 received RT, 14 underwent active surveillance, and 37 patients received CXB boost along with CRT. The median follow-up was 60 months (IQR 52–73). During this time, 29 patients developed recurrence, and 15 died. The 5-year overall survival (OS) was 78.6%, and disease-free survival (DFS) was 70.9%. Compared to CXB, the mortality risk for CRT (HR = 0.81; 95% CI: 0.20–3.28; p = 0.77) and TME (HR = 3.68; 95% CI: 0.46–29.79; p = 0.22) was not significantly different. However, TME was associated with a significantly higher recurrence risk compared to CXB (HR = 7.57; 95% CI: 1.23–46.84; p = 0.029). Conclusions: An organ-preserving strategy with CRT or CRT combined with a CXB boost may offer comparable long-term outcomes and reduced recurrence risks for patients undergoing TEMS for ERC with poor prognostic features. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to validate these results. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 251 KB  
Review
Current Status and Future Directions of Image-Guided Adaptive Brachytherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer
by Nicholas Eustace, Jason Liu, Colton Ladbury, Andrew Tam, Scott Glaser, An Liu and Yi-Jen Chen
Cancers 2024, 16(5), 1031; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16051031 - 2 Mar 2024
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 5580
Abstract
Purpose: The standard of care for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer is definitive chemoradiation followed by a brachytherapy boost. This review describes the current status and future directions of image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Methods: A systematic search of [...] Read more.
Purpose: The standard of care for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer is definitive chemoradiation followed by a brachytherapy boost. This review describes the current status and future directions of image-guided adaptive brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. Methods: A systematic search of the PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov databases was performed, focusing on studies published within the last 10 years. The search queried “cervical cancer [AND] image-guided brachytherapy [OR] magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [OR] adaptive brachytherapy”. Discussion: The retroEMBRACE and EMBRACE-I trials have established the use of MRI as the standard imaging modality for brachytherapy application and planning. Quantitative imaging and radiomics have the potential to improve outcomes, with three ongoing prospective studies examining the use of radiomics to further risk-stratify patients and personalize brachytherapy. Another active area of investigation includes utilizing the superior soft tissue contrast provided by MRI to increase the dose per fraction and decrease the number of fractions needed for brachytherapy, with several retrospective studies demonstrating the safety and feasibility of three-fraction courses. For developing countries with limited access to MRI, trans-rectal ultrasound (TRUS) appears to be an effective alternative, with several retrospective studies demonstrating improved target delineation with the use of TRUS in conjunction with CT guidance. Conclusions: Further investigation is needed to continue improving outcomes for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with image-guided brachytherapy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Image-Guided Radiotherapy for Cancers)
15 pages, 4360 KB  
Review
Rectal Cancer after Prostate Radiation: A Complex and Controversial Disease
by Dana M. Omer, Hannah M. Thompson, Floris S. Verheij, Jonathan B. Yuval, Roni Rosen, Nathalie R. A. Beets, Anisha Luthra, Paul B. Romesser, Philip B. Paty, Julio Garcia-Aguilar and Francisco Sanchez-Vega
Cancers 2023, 15(8), 2214; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15082214 - 9 Apr 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 5097
Abstract
A small proportion of rectal adenocarcinomas develop in patients many years after the treatment of a previous cancer using pelvic radiation, and the incidence of these rectal cancers depends on the length of follow-up from the end of radiotherapy. The risk of radiation-associated [...] Read more.
A small proportion of rectal adenocarcinomas develop in patients many years after the treatment of a previous cancer using pelvic radiation, and the incidence of these rectal cancers depends on the length of follow-up from the end of radiotherapy. The risk of radiation-associated rectal cancer (RARC) is higher in patients treated with prostate external beam radiotherapy than it is in patients treated with brachytherapy. The molecular features of RARC have not been fully investigated, and survival is lower compared to non-irradiated rectal cancer patients. Ultimately, it is unclear whether the worse outcomes are related to differences in patient characteristics, treatment-related factors, or tumor biology. Radiation is widely used in the management of rectal adenocarcinoma; however, pelvic re-irradiation of RARC is challenging and carries a higher risk of treatment complications. Although RARC can develop in patients treated for a variety of malignancies, it is most common in patients treated for prostate cancer. This study will review the incidence, molecular characteristics, clinical course, and treatment outcomes of rectal adenocarcinoma in patients previously treated with radiation for prostate cancer. For clarity, we will distinguish between rectal cancer not associated with prostate cancer (RCNAPC), rectal cancer in non-irradiated prostate cancer patients (RCNRPC), and rectal cancer in irradiated prostate cancer patients (RCRPC). RARC represents a unique but understudied subset of rectal cancer, and thus requires a more comprehensive investigation in order to improve its treatment and prognosis. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gastrointestinal Oncology: Clinical Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 680 KB  
Article
Dose Distribution of High Dose-Rate and Low Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy at Different Intervals—Impact of a Hydrogel Spacer and Prostate Volume
by Hathal Haddad, Horst Hermani, Herbert Hanitzsch, Albert Heidrich and Michael Pinkawa
Cancers 2023, 15(5), 1396; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15051396 - 22 Feb 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3254
Abstract
The study aimed to compare the dose distribution in permanent low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT), specifically focusing on the impact of a spacer and prostate volume. The relative dose distribution of 102 LDR-BT patients (prescription dose 145 Gy) at different intervals [...] Read more.
The study aimed to compare the dose distribution in permanent low-dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR-BT) and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT), specifically focusing on the impact of a spacer and prostate volume. The relative dose distribution of 102 LDR-BT patients (prescription dose 145 Gy) at different intervals was compared with the dose distribution of 105 HDR-BT patients (232 HDR-BT fractions with prescription doses of 9 Gy, n = 151, or 11.5 Gy, n = 81). A hydrogel spacer (10 mL) was only injected before HDR-BT. For the analysis of dose coverage outside the prostate, a 5 mm margin was added to the prostate volume (PV+). Prostate V100 and D90 of HDR-BT and LDR-BT at different intervals were comparable. HDR-BT was characterized by a considerably more homogenous dose distribution and lower doses to the urethra. The minimum dose in 90% of PV+ was higher for larger prostates. As a consequence of the hydrogel spacer in HDR-BT patients, the intraoperative dose at the rectum was considerably lower, especially in smaller prostates. However, prostate volume dose coverage was not improved. The dosimetric results well explain clinical differences between these techniques reported in the literature review, specifically comparable tumor control, higher acute urinary toxicity rates in LDR-BT in comparison to HDR-BT, decreased rectal toxicity after spacer placement, and improved tumor control after HDR-BT in larger prostate volumes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Brachytherapy in the Treatment of Tumors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 271 KB  
Article
A Contemporary Report of Low-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Prostate Cancer Using MRI for Risk Stratification: Disease Outcomes and Patient-Reported Quality of Life
by Mira Patel, William Tyler Turchan, Christopher G. Morris, Dana Augustine, Tianming Wu, Aytek Oto, Gregory P. Zagaja and Stanley L. Liauw
Cancers 2023, 15(4), 1336; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041336 - 20 Feb 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3804
Abstract
Purpose: We examined a prospective consecutive cohort of low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer to evaluate the efficacy of monotherapy for unfavorable-intermediate risk (UIR) disease, and explore factors associated with toxicity and quality of life (QOL). Methods: 149 men with prostate [...] Read more.
Purpose: We examined a prospective consecutive cohort of low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy for prostate cancer to evaluate the efficacy of monotherapy for unfavorable-intermediate risk (UIR) disease, and explore factors associated with toxicity and quality of life (QOL). Methods: 149 men with prostate cancer, including 114 staged with MRI, received Iodine-125 brachytherapy alone (144–145 Gy) or following external beam radiation therapy (110 Gy; EBRT). Patient-reported QOL was assessed by the Expanded Prostate Index Composite (EPIC) survey, and genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity were prospectively recorded (CTC v4.0). Global QOL scores were assessed for decline greater than the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Univariate analysis (UVA) was performed, with 30-day post-implant dosimetry covariates stratified into quartiles. Median follow-up was 63 mo. Results: Men with NCCN low (n = 42) or favorable-intermediate risk (n = 37) disease were treated with brachytherapy alone, while most with high-risk disease had combined EBRT (n = 17 of 18). Men with UIR disease (n = 52) were selected for monotherapy (n = 42) based on clinical factors and MRI findings. Freedom from biochemical failure-7 yr was 98%. Of 37 men with MRI treated with monotherapy for UIR disease, all 36 men without extraprostatic extension were controlled. Late Grade 2+/3+ toxicity occurred in 55/3% for GU and 8/2% for GI, respectively. Fifty men were sexually active at baseline and had 2 yr sexual data; 37 (74%) remained active at 2 yr. Global scores for urinary incontinence (UC), urinary irritation/obstruction (UIO), bowel function, and sexual function (SF) showed decreases greater than the MCID (p < 0.05) in UC at 2 mo, UIO at 2 and 6 mo, and SF at 2–24 mo, and >5 yr. Analysis did not reveal any significant associations with any examined rectal or urethral dosimetry for late toxicity or QOL. Conclusion: Disease outcomes and patient-reported QOL support LDR brachytherapy, including monotherapy for UIR disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy)
14 pages, 2796 KB  
Article
Features on Endoscopy and MRI after Treatment with Contact X-ray Brachytherapy for Rectal Cancer: Explorative Results
by Petra A. Custers, Monique Maas, Doenja M. J. Lambregts, Regina G. H. Beets-Tan, Geerard L. Beets, Femke P. Peters, Corrie A. M. Marijnen, Monique E. van Leerdam, Inge L. Huibregtse and Baukelien van Triest
Cancers 2022, 14(22), 5565; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14225565 - 13 Nov 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2322
Abstract
After neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer, contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) can be applied aiming at organ preservation. This explorative study describes the early features on endoscopy and MRI after CXB. Patients treated with CXB following (chemo)radiotherapy and a follow-up of ≥12 months were [...] Read more.
After neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for rectal cancer, contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) can be applied aiming at organ preservation. This explorative study describes the early features on endoscopy and MRI after CXB. Patients treated with CXB following (chemo)radiotherapy and a follow-up of ≥12 months were selected. Endoscopy and MRI were performed every 3 months. Expert readers scored all the images according to structured reporting templates. Thirty-six patients were included, 15 of whom obtained a cCR. On endoscopy, the most frequently observed feature early in follow-up was an ulcer, regardless of whether patients developed a cCR. A flat, white scar and tumor mass were common at 6 months. Focal tumor signal on T2W-MRI and mass-like high signal on DWI were generally absent in patients with a cCR. An ulceration on T2W-MRI and “reactive” mucosal signal on DWI were observed early in follow-up regardless of the final tumor response. The distinction between a cCR and a residual tumor generally can be made at 6 months. Features associated with a residual tumor are tumor mass on endoscopy, focal tumor signal on T2W-MRI, and mass-like high signal on DWI. Early recognition of these features is necessary to identify patients who will not develop a cCR as early as possible. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Radiotherapy and Prognosis of Rectal Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 690 KB  
Article
Image-Guided Brachytherapy for Rectal Cancer: Reviewing the Past Two Decades of Clinical Investigation
by Te Vuong, Aurelie Garant, Veronique Vendrely, Remi Nout, André-Guy Martin, Shirin A. Enger, Ervin Podgorsak, Belal Moftah and Slobodan Devic
Cancers 2022, 14(19), 4846; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14194846 - 4 Oct 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3364
Abstract
(1) Background: The introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer has led to improvement in local recurrence (LR) outcomes. Furthermore, the addition of preoperative external beam radiotherapy to TME reduces LR to less than 6%. As a trade-off to these gradual [...] Read more.
(1) Background: The introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer has led to improvement in local recurrence (LR) outcomes. Furthermore, the addition of preoperative external beam radiotherapy to TME reduces LR to less than 6%. As a trade-off to these gradual improvements in local therapies, the oncology community’s work is now focusing on mitigating treatment-related toxicities. In other words, if a small proportion of 4–6% of rectal cancer patients benefit from additional local therapy beyond TME, the burden of acute and long-term side effects must be considered with care. (2) Methods: With the introduction of better-quality imaging for tumor visualization and treatment planning, a new conformed radiation treatment was introduced with high-dose-rate endorectal brachytherapy. The treatment concept was tested in phase I and II studies: first in the pre-operative setting, and then as a boost after external beam radiation therapy, as a dose-escalation study, to achieve higher local tumor control. (3) Results: HDREBT is safe and effective in achieving a high tumor regression rate and was well tolerated in a phase II multicenter and two matched-pair studies. (4) Conclusions: HDREBT is a conformed radiation therapy that is safe and effective, and is presently explored in a phase III dose-escalation study in the NOM of patients with operable rectal cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Non Operative Management of Patients with Rectal Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 879 KB  
Article
MORPHEUS Phase II–III Study: A Pre-Planned Interim Safety Analysis and Preliminary Results
by Aurelie Garant, Carol-Ann Vasilevsky, Marylise Boutros, Farzin Khosrow-Khavar, Petr Kavan, Hugo Diec, Sylvain Des Groseilliers, Julio Faria, Emery Ferland, Vincent Pelsser, André-Guy Martin, Slobodan Devic and Te Vuong
Cancers 2022, 14(15), 3665; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14153665 - 28 Jul 2022
Cited by 46 | Viewed by 4708
Abstract
Background: We explored image-guided adaptive endorectal brachytherapy patients electing non-operative management for rectal cancer. We present the first pre-planned interim analysis. Methods: In this open-label phase II–III randomized study, patients with operable cT2-3ab N0 M0 rectal cancer received 45 Gy in 25 fractions [...] Read more.
Background: We explored image-guided adaptive endorectal brachytherapy patients electing non-operative management for rectal cancer. We present the first pre-planned interim analysis. Methods: In this open-label phase II–III randomized study, patients with operable cT2-3ab N0 M0 rectal cancer received 45 Gy in 25 fractions of pelvic external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with 5-FU/Capecitabine. They were randomized 1:1 to receive either an EBRT boost of 9 Gy in 5 fractions (Arm A) or three weekly adaptive brachytherapy (IGAEBT) boosts totaling 30 Gy (Arm B). Patient characteristics and toxicity are presented using descriptive analyses; TME-free survival between arms with the intention to treat the population is explored using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: A total of 40 patients were in this analysis. Baseline characteristics were balanced; acute toxicities were similar. Complete clinical response (cCR) was 50% (n = 10/20) in Arm A and 90% in Arm B (n = 18/20). Median follow-up was 1.3 years; 2-year TME-free survival was 38.6% (95% CI: 16.5–60.6%) in the EBRT arm and 76.6% (95% CI: 56.1–97.1%) in the IGAEBT arm. Conclusions: Radiation intensification with IGAEBT is feasible. This interim analysis suggests an improvement in TME-free survival when comparing IGAEBT with EBRT, pending confirmation upon completion of this trial. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Non Operative Management of Patients with Rectal Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 4399 KB  
Article
Use of Image-Guided Surgical Navigation during Resection of Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer
by Harald C. Groen, Anne G. den Hartog, Wouter J. Heerink, Koert F. D. Kuhlmann, Niels F. M. Kok, Ruben van Veen, Marijn A. J. Hiep, Petur Snaebjornsson, Brechtje A. Grotenhuis, Geerard L. Beets, Arend G. J. Aalbers and Theo J. M. Ruers
Life 2022, 12(5), 645; https://doi.org/10.3390/life12050645 - 27 Apr 2022
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 3370 | Correction
Abstract
Surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) presents several challenges, which is why the percentage of inadequate resections of these tumors is high. In this exploratory study, we evaluate the use of image-guided surgical navigation during resection of LRRC. Patients who were scheduled [...] Read more.
Surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) presents several challenges, which is why the percentage of inadequate resections of these tumors is high. In this exploratory study, we evaluate the use of image-guided surgical navigation during resection of LRRC. Patients who were scheduled to undergo surgical resection of LRRC who were deemed by the multidisciplinary team to be at a high risk of inadequate tumor resection were selected to undergo surgical navigation. The risk of inadequate surgery was further determined by the proximity of the tumor to critical anatomical structures. Workflow characteristics of the surgical navigation procedure were evaluated, while the surgical outcome was determined by the status of the resection margin. In total, 20 patients were analyzed. For all procedures, surgical navigation was completed successfully and demonstrated to be accurate, while no complications related to the surgical navigation were discerned. Radical resection was achieved in 14 cases (70%). In five cases (25%), a tumor-positive resection margin (R1) was anticipated during surgery, as extensive radical resection was determined to be compromised. These patients all received intraoperative brachytherapy. In one case (5%), an unexpected R1 resection was performed. Surgical navigation during resection of LRRC is thus safe and feasible and enables accurate surgical guidance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances and Applications of Image-Guided Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 32118 KB  
Article
Targeted Radiotherapy Using Contact X-ray Brachytherapy 50 kV
by Jean-Pierre Gerard, Arthur Sun Myint, Nicolas Barbet, Catherine Dejean, Brice Thamphya, Jocelyn Gal, Lucile Montagne and Te Vuong
Cancers 2022, 14(5), 1313; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051313 - 3 Mar 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 5179
Abstract
Rectal adenocarcinoma is a quite radioresistant tumor. In order to achieve non-operative management (NOM) radiotherapy plays a major role. Targeted radiotherapy aiming at high precision 3D radiotherapy uses stereotactic image-guided external beam radiotherapy machines. To further safely increase the tumor dose, endocavitary brachytherapy [...] Read more.
Rectal adenocarcinoma is a quite radioresistant tumor. In order to achieve non-operative management (NOM) radiotherapy plays a major role. Targeted radiotherapy aiming at high precision 3D radiotherapy uses stereotactic image-guided external beam radiotherapy machines. To further safely increase the tumor dose, endocavitary brachytherapy (ECB) is an original approach. There are two different ways to perform such an ECB: contact X-ray brachytherapy (CXB) using a 50 kV X-ray generator with an X-ray tube positioned under eye guidance into the rectal cavity and high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRB) using iridium-192 sources positioned into the rectal cavity under image guidance. This study focused on CXB. CXB uses a small mobile generator that produces 50 kV X-rays with limited penetration. This technique is well adapted to accessible tumors of limited size and especially needs a high dose rate (≥15 Gy/minutes) for rectal tumors. It is performed on an ambulatory basis. A total dose between 80–110 Gy is delivered in 3–4 fractions over 3 to 6 weeks into a small volume (5 cm3). CXB was pioneered in the 1970s by Papillon using the Philips RT 50TM. Since 2009, the Papillon P50TM has been used in 11 institutions in Europe. The OPERA Phase III trial tested the hypothesis that a CXB boost (90 Gy/3 fr) compared to an EBRT boost (9 Gy/5 fr) for T2–T3 ab < 5 cm and N0–N1 < 8 mm will increase the 3-year organ preservation (OP) rate when combined with 45 Gy/5 weeks with concomitant capecitabine. Out of more than 300 patients with tumors < 3 cm (1962–1992), Papillon reported a long-term local control close to 85%. Similar results were published in Europe and USA at that time. The Lyon R96-2 Phase III trial (2004) demonstrated that, when combined with preoperative EBRT, a CXB boost (90 Gy/3 fr) significantly increased the rate of clinical complete response (cCR) and sphincter preservation, with some patients having OP at 10 years. With more than 2000 patients treated in Europe (2010–2020) using the Papillon 50TM, organ preservation appears possible in close to 80% of cases in selected early T2–T3. The OPERA trial closed after 141 inclusions (2015–2020) after an independent data monitoring committee recommendation because of promising results. At the 2-year follow-up (blinded data), the rate of cCR and OP were 77% and 72%, respectively, for the 141 tumors, and for T < 3 cm (61 pts), they were 86% and 85%, respectively, with good bowel function. The final results should be available in 2022. Organ preservation using NOM appears to be a promising approach for rectal cancer. A CXB boost with chemoradiotherapy in selected early T2–T3 could become an attractive option to achieve a planned OP. This approach should be proposed to well-informed patients after discussion in an MDT. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Non Operative Management of Patients with Rectal Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 1033 KB  
Case Report
Diagnostic Framework of Pelvic Massive Necrosis with Peritonitis following Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: When Is the Surgery Not Demandable? A Case Report and Literature Review
by Elisabetta Sanna, Giacomo Chiappe, Fabrizio Lavra, Sonia Nemolato, Sara Oppi, Antonio Macciò and Clelia Madeddu
Diagnostics 2022, 12(2), 440; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics12020440 - 9 Feb 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3911
Abstract
Concurrent platinum-based chemoradiation (CCRT) is the established treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer and has an acceptable toxicity. Radiation-induced necrosis of the uterus and pelvic tissue is a rare and usually late potential complication. Limited data are available about its management. Here, we [...] Read more.
Concurrent platinum-based chemoradiation (CCRT) is the established treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer and has an acceptable toxicity. Radiation-induced necrosis of the uterus and pelvic tissue is a rare and usually late potential complication. Limited data are available about its management. Here, we describe a case of a patient affected by a locally advanced cervical cancer (stage IVA) who received CCRT, obtaining a partial response with persistence of bladder and rectal infiltration. Unfortunately, after the first brachytherapy dose, the patient developed a worsening clinical picture with fever and altered laboratory data indicative of sepsis; the computed tomography revealed a massive necrosis of the uterus with pelvic abscess and peritonitis. We performed a laparoscopic emergency surgery with removal of the necrotic tissue, supracervical hysterectomy, bilateral-oophorectomy, and abscess drainage. Thereafter, once the severe inflammatory condition was resolved, the patient underwent pelvic exenteration with palliative/curative intent. The postoperative PET/CT was negative for residual disease. However, the patient needed further hospitalization for re-occurrence of peritonitis with multiple abscesses. A careful diagnosis is crucial in locally advanced cervical cancer patients who, after CCRT, present persistent pain and problematic findings at imaging and laboratory parameters. In these cases, radiation-induced necrosis of the pelvis should be suspected. This case helps to clarify the central role of surgery, especially when actinic necrosis leads to complications such as abscess, fistulae, and extensive tissue destruction that cannot be conservatively medically handled. Laparoscopy represents an ideal approach to realizing the correct diagnosis, as well as enabling the performance of important therapeutic surgical procedures. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Management of Gynecological Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop