Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (24)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = postlingual hearing loss

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
14 pages, 1377 KB  
Article
Machine Learning Versus Simple Clinical Models for Cochlear Implant Outcome Prediction
by Rieke Ollermann, Nils Strodthoff, Andreas Radeloff and Robert Böscke
Audiol. Res. 2025, 15(6), 161; https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres15060161 - 21 Nov 2025
Viewed by 588
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Cochlear implantation is the most widely used treatment option for patients with severe to profound hearing loss. Despite being a relatively standardized surgical procedure, cochlear implant (CI) outcomes vary considerably among patients. Several studies have attempted to develop predictive models for CI [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Cochlear implantation is the most widely used treatment option for patients with severe to profound hearing loss. Despite being a relatively standardized surgical procedure, cochlear implant (CI) outcomes vary considerably among patients. Several studies have attempted to develop predictive models for CI outcomes but achieving accurate and generalizable predictions remains challenging. The present study aimed to evaluate whether simple and complex statistical and machine learning models could outperform the Null model based on various pre-CI implantation variables. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 236 ears with postlingual profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and measurable residual hearing (WRSmax > 0%) at the time of implantation. The median postoperative word recognition score with CI (WRS65(CI)) was 75% [Q1: 55%, Q3: 80%]. The dataset was divided using a 70:15:15 split into training (n = 165), validation (n = 35) and test (n = 36) cohorts. We evaluated multiple modeling approaches: different Generalized Linear Model (GLM) approaches, Elastic Net, XGBoost, Random Forest, ensemble methods, and a Null model baseline. Results: All models demonstrated similar predictive performance, with root mean squared errors ranging from 26.28 percentage points (pp) to 30.74 and mean absolute errors ranging from 20.62 pp to 23.75 pp. Coefficients of determination (R2) ranged from −0.468 to −0.073. Bland–Altman analyses revealed wide limits of agreement and consistent negative bias, while Passing–Bablok regression indicated calibration errors. Nonetheless, all models incorporating predictors significantly outperformed the Null model. Conclusions: Increasing model complexity yielded only marginal improvements in predictive accuracy compared with simpler statistical models. Pre-implantation clinical variables showed limited evidence of predictive validity for CI outcomes, although further research is needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Hearing)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 964 KB  
Article
A Machine Learning Model to Predict Postoperative Speech Recognition Outcomes in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Development, Validation, and Comparison with Expert Clinical Judgment
by Alexey Demyanchuk, Eugen Kludt, Thomas Lenarz and Andreas Büchner
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(11), 3625; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113625 - 22 May 2025
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1651
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Cochlear implantation (CI) significantly enhances speech perception and quality of life in patients with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss, yet outcomes vary substantially. Accurate preoperative prediction of CI outcomes remains challenging. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Cochlear implantation (CI) significantly enhances speech perception and quality of life in patients with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss, yet outcomes vary substantially. Accurate preoperative prediction of CI outcomes remains challenging. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model predicting postoperative speech recognition using a large, single-center dataset. Additionally, we compared model performance with expert clinical predictions to evaluate potential clinical utility. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 2571 adult patients with postlingual hearing loss who received their cochlear implant between 2000 and 2022 at Hannover Medical School, Germany. A decision tree regression model was trained to predict monosyllabic (MS) word recognition score one to two years post-implantation using preoperative clinical variables (age, duration of deafness, preoperative MS score, pure tone average, onset type, and contralateral implantation status). Model evaluation was performed using a random data split (10%), a chronological future cohort (patients implanted after 2020), and a subset where experienced audiologists predicted outcomes for comparison. Results: The model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 17.3% on the random test set and 17.8% on the chronological test set, demonstrating robust predictive performance over time. Compared to expert audiologist predictions, the model showed similar accuracy (MAE: 19.1% for the model vs. 18.9% for experts), suggesting comparable effectiveness. Conclusions: Our machine learning model reliably predicts postoperative speech outcomes and matches expert clinical predictions, highlighting its potential for supporting clinical decision-making. Future research should include external validation and prospective trials to further confirm clinical applicability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Challenges and Prospects in Cochlear Implantation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 5102 KB  
Article
Bi-Allelic MARVELD2 Variant Identified with Exome Sequencing in a Consanguineous Multiplex Ghanaian Family Segregating Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss
by Elvis Twumasi Aboagye, Samuel Mawuli Adadey, Leonardo Alves de Souza Rios, Kevin K. Esoh, Edmond Wonkam-Tingang, Lettilia Xhakaza, Carmen De Kock, Isabelle Schrauwen, Lucas Amenga-Etego, Dirk Lang, Gordon A. Awandare, Suzanne M. Leal, Shaheen Mowla and Ambroise Wonkam
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(7), 3337; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26073337 - 3 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1346
Abstract
Genetic studies and phenotypic expansion of hearing loss (HL) for people living in Africa are greatly needed. We evaluated the clinical phenotypes of three affected siblings presenting non-syndromic (NS) HL and five unaffected members of a consanguineous Ghanaian family. Analysis of exome sequence [...] Read more.
Genetic studies and phenotypic expansion of hearing loss (HL) for people living in Africa are greatly needed. We evaluated the clinical phenotypes of three affected siblings presenting non-syndromic (NS) HL and five unaffected members of a consanguineous Ghanaian family. Analysis of exome sequence data was performed for all affected and one unaffected family members. In-depth genetic and cellular characterization studies were performed to investigate biological significance of the implicated variant using bioinformatic tools and cell-based experimentation. Audiological examinations showed severe-to-profound, bilateral, symmetrical, and post-lingual onset. The whole-exome sequencing (WES) identified a homozygous frameshift variant: MARVEL domain containing 2 (MARVELD2):c.1058dup;p.(Val354Serfs*5) in all affected siblings. This frameshift variant leads to an early stop codon insertion and predicted to be targeted by nonsense medicated decay (mutant protein predicted to lack conserved C-terminal domain if translated). Cell immunofluorescence and immunocytochemistry studies exposed the functional impact of the mutant protein’s expression, stability, localization, protein–protein binding, barrier function, and actin cytoskeleton architecture. The identified variant segregates with NSHL in the index Ghanaian family. The data support this nonsense variant as pathogenic, likely to impact the homeostasis of ions, solutes, and other molecules, compromising membrane barrier and signaling in the inner ear spaces. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hearing Loss: Recent Progress in Molecular Genomics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1046 KB  
Article
Assessing the Recognition of Social Interactions Through Body Motion in the Routine Care of Patients with Post-Lingual Sensorineural Hearing Loss
by Cordélia Fauvet, Léa Cantini, Aude-Eva Chaudoreille, Elisa Cancian, Barbara Bonnel, Chloé Sérignac, Alexandre Derreumaux, Philippe Robert, Nicolas Guevara, Auriane Gros and Valeria Manera
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(5), 1604; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051604 - 27 Feb 2025
Viewed by 773
Abstract
Background: Body motion significantly contributes to understanding communicative and social interactions, especially when auditory information is impaired. The visual skills of people with hearing loss are often enhanced and compensate for some of the missing auditory information. In the present study, we investigated [...] Read more.
Background: Body motion significantly contributes to understanding communicative and social interactions, especially when auditory information is impaired. The visual skills of people with hearing loss are often enhanced and compensate for some of the missing auditory information. In the present study, we investigated the recognition of social interactions by observing body motion in people with post-lingual sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). Methods: In total, 38 participants with post-lingual SNHL and 38 matched normally hearing individuals (NHIs) were presented with point-light stimuli of two agents who were either engaged in a communicative interaction or acting independently. They were asked to classify the actions as communicative vs. independent and to select the correct action description. Results: No significant differences were found between the participants with SNHL and the NHIs when classifying the actions. However, the participants with SNHL showed significantly lower performance compared with the NHIs in the description task due to a higher tendency to misinterpret communicative stimuli. In addition, acquired SNHL was associated with a significantly higher number of errors, with a tendency to over-interpret independent stimuli as communicative and to misinterpret communicative actions. Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest a misinterpretation of visual understanding of social interactions in individuals with SNHL and over-interpretation of communicative intentions in SNHL acquired later in life. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3903 KB  
Systematic Review
“Do You Hear What I Hear?” Speech and Voice Alterations in Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review
by Arianna Di Stadio, Jake Sossamon, Pietro De Luca, Iole Indovina, Giovanni Motta, Massimo Ralli, Michael J. Brenner, Elliot M. Frohman and Gordon T. Plant
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(5), 1428; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14051428 - 20 Feb 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2055
Abstract
Background: Although hearing loss influences voice characteristics, such changes may be under-recognized during clinical consultations. This systematic review examines voice alterations in adults with post-lingual hearing loss, considering diagnostic and rehabilitative implications. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google [...] Read more.
Background: Although hearing loss influences voice characteristics, such changes may be under-recognized during clinical consultations. This systematic review examines voice alterations in adults with post-lingual hearing loss, considering diagnostic and rehabilitative implications. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, targeting studies reporting quantitative data on vocal parameters in adults with sensorineural hearing loss. Exclusion criteria included pre-lingual hearing loss and non-English studies. Data extraction focused on pitch, loudness, and prosody, with study quality assessed using NIH tools. Results: Eleven case–control studies, involving 594 patients with sensorineural hearing loss and 326 control patients, were analyzed. Patients with untreated hearing loss exhibited elevated fundamental frequency, F0 (males: 158–169 Hz; females: 206–251 Hz) and loudness levels (males: 79–96 dB; females: 89–116 dB) compared to controls (F0—males: 75–150 Hz; females: 150–300 Hz; loudness—males: 30–70 dB; females: 40–68 dB). Alterations in jitter, shimmer, and maximum phonation time (MPT) contributed to the distinct “hearing loss voice”. Cochlear implants (CIs) and hearing aids improved vocal parameters, with CIs reducing F0 by approximately 12–15 Hz. Continuous hearing aid use normalized pitch and loudness within four months. Prosody alterations, such as monotone speech, were reported in long-term cases. In noisy environments, individuals with hearing loss exhibited exaggerated increases in pitch and loudness, indicative of compensatory mechanisms. Conclusions: Post-lingual hearing loss disrupts the central regulation of voice, altering pitch, loudness, and other vocal parameters. Recognizing these changes, particularly in noisy environments, could facilitate the early diagnosis and timely rehabilitation of hearing deficits, potentially mitigating associated risks of cognitive decline. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in the Management of Voice Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 715 KB  
Article
Visual Reliance in Severe Hearing Loss: Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs) Study
by Takwa Gabr, Ahmed Hashem, Sherihan Rezk Ahmed and Mohamed G. Zeinhom
Audiol. Res. 2025, 15(1), 3; https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres15010003 - 13 Jan 2025
Viewed by 1633
Abstract
Peripheral hearing loss is associated with the cross-modal re-organization of the auditory cortex, which can occur in both pre- and post-lingual deaf cases. Background/Objectives: Whether to rely on the visual cues in cases with severe hearing loss with adequate amplification is a matter [...] Read more.
Peripheral hearing loss is associated with the cross-modal re-organization of the auditory cortex, which can occur in both pre- and post-lingual deaf cases. Background/Objectives: Whether to rely on the visual cues in cases with severe hearing loss with adequate amplification is a matter of debate. So, this study aims to study visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in children with severe or profound HL, whether fitted with HAs or CIs. Methods: This study included three groups of children matched in age and gender: normal hearing, children with hearing thresholds >70 dBHL and fitted with power HAs, and children fitted with CIs. All cases were subjected to pure tone audiometry (aided and unaided), speech discrimination scores, ophthalmic examinations, and visual evoked potentials (VEPs). Results: SD% scores significantly improved with the use of VCs in both CI and HL groups, and a significantly higher P100 amplitude of VEPs in both CI and HL groups (more in children fitted with CIs). Conclusions: Cross-modal reorganization in severe degrees of HL is of great benefit whether they are fitted with HAs or CIs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3055 KB  
Article
Cross-Modal Plasticity in Postlingual Hearing Loss Predicts Speech Perception Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation
by Fátima Ávila-Cascajares, Clara Waleczek, Sophie Kerres, Boris Suchan and Christiane Völter
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(23), 7016; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13237016 - 21 Nov 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3262
Abstract
Background: Sensory loss may lead to intra- and cross-modal cortical reorganization. Previous research showed a significant correlation between the cross-modal contribution of the right auditory cortex to visual evoked potentials (VEP) and speech perception in cochlear implant (CI) users with prelingual hearing loss [...] Read more.
Background: Sensory loss may lead to intra- and cross-modal cortical reorganization. Previous research showed a significant correlation between the cross-modal contribution of the right auditory cortex to visual evoked potentials (VEP) and speech perception in cochlear implant (CI) users with prelingual hearing loss (HL), but not in those with postlingual HL. The present study aimed to explore the cortical reorganization induced by postlingual HL, particularly in the right temporal region, and how it correlates with speech perception outcome with a CI. Material and Methods: A total of 53 adult participants were divided into two groups according to hearing ability: 35 had normal hearing (NH) (mean age = 62.10 years (±7.48)) and 18 had profound postlingual HL (mean age = 63.78 years (±8.44)). VEPs, using a 29-channel electroencephalogram (EEG) system, were recorded preoperatively in the 18 patients scheduled for cochlear implantation and in 35 NH adults who served as the control group. Amplitudes and latencies of the P100, N100, and P200 components were analyzed across frontal, temporal, and occipital areas and compared between NH and HL subjects using repeated measures ANOVA. For the HL group, speech perception in quiet was assessed at 6 and 12 months of CI use. Results: No difference was found in amplitudes or latencies of the P100, N100, and P200 VEP components between the NH and HL groups. Further analysis using Spearman correlations between preoperative amplitudes and latencies of the P100, N100, and P200 VEP components at the right temporal electrode position T8 and postoperative speech perception showed that the HL group had either significantly higher or significantly lower amplitudes of the P200 component at the right temporal electrode position T8 compared to the NH controls. The HL subgroup with higher amplitudes had better speech perception than the subgroup with lower amplitudes at 6 months and 12 months of CI use. Conclusions: Preoperative evaluation of cortical plasticity can reveal plasticity profiles, which might help to better predict postoperative speech outcomes and adapt the rehabilitation regimen after CI activation. Further research is needed to understand the susceptibility of each component to cross-modal reorganization and their specific contribution to outcome prediction. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 1563 KB  
Article
Evolving a Model for Cochlear Implant Outcome
by Ulrich Hoppe, Anne Hast, Joachim Hornung and Thomas Hocke
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(19), 6215; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12196215 - 26 Sep 2023
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 2505
Abstract
Background: Cochlear implantation is an efficient treatment for postlingually deafened adults who do not benefit sufficiently from acoustic amplification. Implantation is indicated when it can be foreseen that speech recognition with a cochlear implant (CI) is superior to that with a hearing aid. [...] Read more.
Background: Cochlear implantation is an efficient treatment for postlingually deafened adults who do not benefit sufficiently from acoustic amplification. Implantation is indicated when it can be foreseen that speech recognition with a cochlear implant (CI) is superior to that with a hearing aid. Especially for subjects with residual speech recognition, it is desirable to predict CI outcome on the basis of preoperative audiological tests. Purpose: The purpose of the study was to extend and refine a previously developed model for CI outcome prediction for subjects with preoperative word recognition to include subjects with no residual hearing by incorporating additional results of routine examinations. Results: By introducing the duration of unaided hearing loss (DuHL), the median absolute error (MAE) of the prediction was reduced. While for subjects with preoperative speech recognition, the model modification did not change the MAE, for subjects with no residual speech recognition before surgery, the MAE decreased from 23.7% with the previous model to 17.2% with the extended model. Conclusions: Prediction of word recognition with CI is possible within clinically relevant limits. Outcome prediction is particularly important for preoperative counseling and in CI aftercare to support systematic monitoring of CI fitting. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 523 KB  
Review
Autosomal Dominant Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss (DFNA): A Comprehensive Narrative Review
by Mirko Aldè, Giovanna Cantarella, Diego Zanetti, Lorenzo Pignataro, Ignazio La Mantia, Luigi Maiolino, Salvatore Ferlito, Paola Di Mauro, Salvatore Cocuzza, Jérôme René Lechien, Giannicola Iannella, Francois Simon and Antonino Maniaci
Biomedicines 2023, 11(6), 1616; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines11061616 - 1 Jun 2023
Cited by 47 | Viewed by 10505
Abstract
Autosomal dominant non-syndromic hearing loss (HL) typically occurs when only one dominant allele within the disease gene is sufficient to express the phenotype. Therefore, most patients diagnosed with autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL have a hearing-impaired parent, although de novo mutations should be considered [...] Read more.
Autosomal dominant non-syndromic hearing loss (HL) typically occurs when only one dominant allele within the disease gene is sufficient to express the phenotype. Therefore, most patients diagnosed with autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL have a hearing-impaired parent, although de novo mutations should be considered in all cases of negative family history. To date, more than 50 genes and 80 loci have been identified for autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL. DFNA22 (MYO6 gene), DFNA8/12 (TECTA gene), DFNA20/26 (ACTG1 gene), DFNA6/14/38 (WFS1 gene), DFNA15 (POU4F3 gene), DFNA2A (KCNQ4 gene), and DFNA10 (EYA4 gene) are some of the most common forms of autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL. The characteristics of autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL are heterogenous. However, in most cases, HL tends to be bilateral, post-lingual in onset (childhood to early adulthood), high-frequency (sloping audiometric configuration), progressive, and variable in severity (mild to profound degree). DFNA1 (DIAPH1 gene) and DFNA6/14/38 (WFS1 gene) are the most common forms of autosomal dominant non-syndromic HL affecting low frequencies, while DFNA16 (unknown gene) is characterized by fluctuating HL. A long audiological follow-up is of paramount importance to identify hearing threshold deteriorations early and ensure prompt treatment with hearing aids or cochlear implants. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Research on Hearing Loss 2.0)
11 pages, 1158 KB  
Article
Effectiveness of Expanded Instantaneous Input Dynamic Range Adjustment on Speech Perception
by Toru Sonoyama, Takashi Ishino, Takashi Oda, Yuichiro Horibe, Nobuyuki Chikuie, Takashi Kono, Takayuki Taruya, Takao Hamamoto, Tsutomu Ueda and Sachio Takeno
J. Pers. Med. 2022, 12(11), 1860; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm12111860 - 7 Nov 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2163
Abstract
Instantaneous input dynamic range (IIDR), as defined by Cochlear Ltd. (Sydney, Australia), refers to the acoustic level of short-term input dynamic range (IDR). Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of expanding IIDR to improve speech understanding. We enrolled 11 unilateral Cochlear Ltd. [...] Read more.
Instantaneous input dynamic range (IIDR), as defined by Cochlear Ltd. (Sydney, Australia), refers to the acoustic level of short-term input dynamic range (IDR). Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of expanding IIDR to improve speech understanding. We enrolled 11 unilateral Cochlear Ltd. patients with post-lingual hearing loss. The two types of IIDR settings (T-SPL/C-SPL of 25/65 dB (default IIDR) and 25/80 dB (wide IIDR)) were blindly assigned, and only one IIDR setting selected according to their preference was used for at least three months. Each IIDR group was evaluated with both default and wide IIDR conditions using the recorded word and sentence test materials of the Japanese CD speech discrimination scoring system (CI-2004 test) in quiet and noise with a signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of +10 dB, presented at 65/80 dB SPL. Wide IIDR significantly improved speech perception in all tests, except for sentences in quiet conditions at a presentation level of 65 dB. Improvements during loud conversations in noisy environments were obtained without any adaptation period. Wide IIDR should become a new individual configuration setting method in Cochlear Ltd. devices to improve hearing in loud conversations and noisy environments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Personalized Therapy in Clinical Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 644 KB  
Review
The Effects of Cortical Reorganization and Applications of Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy in Deaf People and Cochlear Implant Users
by Xiaoqing Zhou, Menglong Feng, Yaqin Hu, Chanyuan Zhang, Qingling Zhang, Xiaoqin Luo and Wei Yuan
Brain Sci. 2022, 12(9), 1150; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci12091150 - 28 Aug 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4784
Abstract
A cochlear implant (CI) is currently the only FDA-approved biomedical device that can restore hearing for the majority of patients with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). While prelingually and postlingually deaf individuals benefit substantially from CI, the outcomes after implantation vary greatly. Numerous [...] Read more.
A cochlear implant (CI) is currently the only FDA-approved biomedical device that can restore hearing for the majority of patients with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). While prelingually and postlingually deaf individuals benefit substantially from CI, the outcomes after implantation vary greatly. Numerous studies have attempted to study the variables that affect CI outcomes, including the personal characteristics of CI candidates, environmental variables, and device-related variables. Up to 80% of the results remained unexplainable because all these variables could only roughly predict auditory performance with a CI. Brain structure/function differences after hearing deprivation, that is, cortical reorganization, has gradually attracted the attention of neuroscientists. The cross-modal reorganization in the auditory cortex following deafness is thought to be a key factor in the success of CI. In recent years, the adaptive and maladaptive effects of this reorganization on CI rehabilitation have been argued because the neural mechanisms of how this reorganization impacts CI learning and rehabilitation have not been revealed. Due to the lack of brain processes describing how this plasticity affects CI learning and rehabilitation, the adaptive and deleterious consequences of this reorganization on CI outcomes have recently been the subject of debate. This review describes the evidence for different roles of cross-modal reorganization in CI performance and attempts to explore the possible reasons. Additionally, understanding the core influencing mechanism requires taking into account the cortical changes from deafness to hearing restoration. However, methodological issues have restricted longitudinal research on cortical function in CI. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has been increasingly used for the study of brain function and language assessment in CI because of its unique advantages, which are considered to have great potential. Here, we review studies on auditory cortex reorganization in deaf patients and CI recipients, and then we try to illustrate the feasibility of fNIRS as a neuroimaging tool in predicting and assessing speech performance in CI recipients. Here, we review research on the cross-modal reorganization of the auditory cortex in deaf patients and CI recipients and seek to demonstrate the viability of using fNIRS as a neuroimaging technique to predict and evaluate speech function in CI recipients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Topic Brain, Hearing and Tinnitus Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1552 KB  
Article
Searching for the Molecular Basis of Partial Deafness
by Dominika Oziębło, Natalia Bałdyga, Marcin L. Leja, Henryk Skarżyński and Monika Ołdak
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(11), 6029; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23116029 - 27 May 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2619
Abstract
Hearing is an important human sense for communicating and connecting with others. Partial deafness (PD) is a common hearing problem, in which there is a down-sloping audiogram. In this study, we apply a practical system for classifying PD patients, used for treatment purposes, [...] Read more.
Hearing is an important human sense for communicating and connecting with others. Partial deafness (PD) is a common hearing problem, in which there is a down-sloping audiogram. In this study, we apply a practical system for classifying PD patients, used for treatment purposes, to distinguish two groups of patients: one with almost normal hearing thresholds at low frequencies (PDT-EC, n = 20), and a second group with poorer thresholds at those same low frequencies (PDT-EAS, n = 20). After performing comprehensive genetic testing with a panel of 237 genes, we found that genetic factors can explain a significant proportion of both PDT-EC and PDT-EAS hearing losses, accounting, respectively, for approx. one-fifth and one-half of all the cases in our cohort. Most of the causative variants were located in dominant and recessive genes previously linked to PD, but more than half of the variants were novel. Among the contributors to PDT-EC we identified OSBPL2 and SYNE4, two relatively new hereditary hearing loss genes with a low publication profile. Our study revealed that, for all PD patients, a postlingual hearing loss more severe in the low-frequency range is associated with a higher detection rate of causative variants. Isolating a genetic cause of PD is important in terms of prognosis, therapeutic effectiveness, and risk of recurrence. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Partial Deafness: From Molecular Basis to Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3978 KB  
Article
Clinical Heterogeneity Associated with MYO7A Variants Relies on Affected Domains
by Sun Young Joo, Gina Na, Jung Ah Kim, Jee Eun Yoo, Da Hye Kim, Se Jin Kim, Seung Hyun Jang, Seyoung Yu, Hye-Youn Kim, Jae Young Choi, Heon Yung Gee and Jinsei Jung
Biomedicines 2022, 10(4), 798; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10040798 - 29 Mar 2022
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 4308
Abstract
Autosomal dominant hearing loss (ADHL) manifests as an adult-onset disease or a progressive disease. MYO7A variants are associated with DFNA11, a subtype of ADHL. Here, we examined the role and genotype–phenotype correlation of MYO7A in ADHL. Enrolled families suspected of having post-lingual sensorineural [...] Read more.
Autosomal dominant hearing loss (ADHL) manifests as an adult-onset disease or a progressive disease. MYO7A variants are associated with DFNA11, a subtype of ADHL. Here, we examined the role and genotype–phenotype correlation of MYO7A in ADHL. Enrolled families suspected of having post-lingual sensorineural hearing loss were selected for exome sequencing. Mutational alleles in MYO7A were identified according to ACMG guidelines. Segregation analysis was performed to examine whether pathogenic variants segregated with affected status of families. All identified pathogenic variants were evaluated for a phenotype–genotype correlation. MYO7A variants were detected in 4.7% of post-lingual families, and 12 of 14 families were multiplex. Five potentially pathogenic missense variants were identified. Fourteen variants causing autosomal dominant deafness were clustered in motor and MyTH4 domains of MYO7A protein. Missense variants in the motor domain caused late onset of hearing loss with ascending tendency. A severe audiological phenotype was apparent in individuals carrying tail domain variants. We report two new pathogenic variants responsible for DFNA11 in the Korean ADHL population. Dominant pathogenic variants of MYO7A occur frequently in motor and MyTH4 domains. Audiological differences among individuals correspond to specific domains which contain the variants. Therefore, appropriate rehabilitation is needed, particularly for patients with late-onset familial hearing loss. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Research on Hearing Loss)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 913 KB  
Article
Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of Finnish Patients with Autosomal Recessive and Dominant Non-Syndromic Hearing Loss Due to Pathogenic TMC1 Variants
by Minna Kraatari-Tiri, Maria K. Haanpää, Tytti Willberg, Pia Pohjola, Riikka Keski-Filppula, Outi Kuismin, Jukka S. Moilanen, Sanna Häkli and Elisa Rahikkala
J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11(7), 1837; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071837 - 26 Mar 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2875
Abstract
Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is one of the most common sensory deficits worldwide, and genetic factors contribute to at least 50–60% of the congenital hearing loss cases. The transmembrane channel-like protein 1 (TMC1) gene has been linked to autosomal recessive (DFNB7/11) [...] Read more.
Sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is one of the most common sensory deficits worldwide, and genetic factors contribute to at least 50–60% of the congenital hearing loss cases. The transmembrane channel-like protein 1 (TMC1) gene has been linked to autosomal recessive (DFNB7/11) and autosomal dominant (DFNA36) non-syndromic hearing loss, and it is a relatively common genetic cause of SNHL. Here, we report eight Finnish families with 11 affected family members with either recessively inherited homozygous or compound heterozygous TMC1 variants associated with congenital moderate-to-profound hearing loss, or a dominantly inherited heterozygous TMC1 variant associated with postlingual progressive hearing loss. We show that the TMC1 c.1534C>T, p.(Arg512*) variant is likely a founder variant that is enriched in the Finnish population. We describe a novel recessive disease-causing TMC1 c.968A>G, p.(Tyr323Cys) variant. We also show that individuals in this cohort who were diagnosed early and received timely hearing rehabilitation with hearing aids and cochlear implants (CI) have reached good speech perception in noise. Comparison of the genetic data with the outcome of CI rehabilitation increases our understanding of the extent to which underlying pathogenic gene variants explain the differences in CI rehabilitation outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hearing Disorders: Diagnosis, Management, and Future Opportunities)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 772 KB  
Systematic Review
Metabolomic Studies in Inner Ear Pathologies
by Luc Boullaud, Hélène Blasco, Thuy-Trân Trinh and David Bakhos
Metabolites 2022, 12(3), 214; https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo12030214 - 26 Feb 2022
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 3087
Abstract
Sensorineural hearing loss is the most common sensory deficit. The etiologies of sensorineural hearing loss have been described and can be congenital or acquired. For congenital non-syndromic hearing loss, mutations that are related to sites of cochlear damage have been discovered (e.g., connexin [...] Read more.
Sensorineural hearing loss is the most common sensory deficit. The etiologies of sensorineural hearing loss have been described and can be congenital or acquired. For congenital non-syndromic hearing loss, mutations that are related to sites of cochlear damage have been discovered (e.g., connexin proteins, mitochondrial genes, etc.). For cytomegalovirus infection or auditory neuropathies, mechanisms are also well known and well researched. Although the etiologies of sensorineural hearing loss may be evident for some patients, the damaged sites and pathological mechanisms remain unclear for patients with progressive post-lingual hearing loss. Metabolomics is an emerging technique in which all metabolites present in a sample at a given time are analyzed, reflecting a physiological state. The objective of this study was to review the literature on the use of metabolomics in hearing loss. The findings of this review suggest that metabolomic studies may help to develop objective tests for diagnosis and personalized treatment. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Hearing Loss and Metabolism)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop