Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (196)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = posterior fixation

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 3728 KiB  
Technical Note
Cervical Lateral Mass and Pedicle Fracture Reduced with a Herbert Screw: A Technical Note
by Antonio Colamaria, Francesco Carbone, Augusto Leone, Giuseppe Palmieri, Savino Iodice, Bianca Maria Baldassarre, Giovanni Cirrottola, Valeria Ble, Uwe Spetzger and Giuseppe Di Perna
Med. Sci. 2025, 13(3), 92; https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci13030092 - 19 Jul 2025
Viewed by 311
Abstract
Background: Traumatic fractures of the cervical spine pose significant challenges in management, particularly in young patients, where preserving mobility is crucial. Patient Characteristics: A 30-year-old woman presented with a C3 lateral mass and pedicle fracture following a motor vehicle collision. Initial conservative management [...] Read more.
Background: Traumatic fractures of the cervical spine pose significant challenges in management, particularly in young patients, where preserving mobility is crucial. Patient Characteristics: A 30-year-old woman presented with a C3 lateral mass and pedicle fracture following a motor vehicle collision. Initial conservative management with a rigid cervical collar for three months failed to reduce the diastasis, and the debilitating neck pain worsened. Preoperative imaging confirmed fracture instability without spinal cord compression. Intervention and Outcome: Preoperative screw trajectory planning was conducted with the My Spine MC system (Medacta), and fine-tuning was achieved on a 3D-printed model of the vertebra. A posterior midline approach was employed to expose the C3 vertebra, and a Herbert screw was inserted under fluoroscopic guidance. Imaging at three months demonstrated significant fracture reduction and early bone fusion. The patient achieved substantial improvement in functional mobility without complications. Conclusion: Herbert screw fixation holds potential as a less-invasive alternative to conventional posterior stabilization for selected cervical fractures. This technical note provides the reader with the required information to support surgical planning and execution. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 4725 KiB  
Tutorial
Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis—Current Understanding and Open Questions
by Amber Gordon, Michela Saracco, Peter V. Giannoudis and Nikolaos K. Kanakaris
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 5122; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14145122 - 18 Jul 2025
Viewed by 839
Abstract
Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs) are common in elderly patients, particularly those with osteoporosis. FFPs can be associated with high mortality, morbidity, and functional decline. Known risk factors include being over 80 years old and delays in surgical intervention when this is [...] Read more.
Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs) are common in elderly patients, particularly those with osteoporosis. FFPs can be associated with high mortality, morbidity, and functional decline. Known risk factors include being over 80 years old and delays in surgical intervention when this is required. While the role of surgery in FFPs remains less defined than in proximal femoral fractures in the elderly, studies indicate that surgical fixation offers improved survival and functional outcomes. Similarly, the choice of fixation method, whether posterior or anterior, and their combinations, vary between clinicians. It depends on the fracture type and patient-specific factors, such as bone quality and comorbidities, as well as the surgeon’s experience and the availability of resources. Additionally, orthobiologic adjuncts such as cement augmentation and sacroplasty can enhance the stability of an osteoporotic fracture during surgical intervention. Furthermore, medical treatments for osteoporosis, especially the use of teriparatide, have demonstrated beneficial effects in reducing fractures and promoting healing of the FFPs. Return to pre-injury activities is often limited, with independence rates remaining low at mid-term follow-up. Factors that influence clinical outcomes include fracture type, with Type III and IV fractures generally leading to poorer outcomes, and patient age, functional reserve, and comorbidities. The present tutorial aims to summarise the relevant evidence on all aspects of FFPs, inform an updated management strategy, and provide a template of the reconstruction ladder referring to the most available surgical techniques and treatment methods. Further research, based on large-scale studies, is needed to address the open questions described in this manuscript and refine surgical techniques, as well as determine optimal treatment pathways for this vulnerable patient population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The “Orthogeriatric Fracture Syndrome”—Issues and Perspectives)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 514 KiB  
Article
Mechanical and Biological Complications Two Years After Full-Arch Implant-Supported Prosthetic Rehabilitation: A Retrospective Clinical Study
by Denisa Tabita Sabău, Petra Saitos, Rahela Tabita Moca, Raluca Iulia Juncar and Mihai Juncar
Clin. Pract. 2025, 15(7), 134; https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15070134 - 18 Jul 2025
Viewed by 337
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Full-arch implant-supported prostheses have become a widely accepted solution for edentulous patients, yet long-term biological and mechanical complications remain a clinical concern. Methods: This retrospective study included 70 fully edentulous patients (362 implants) rehabilitated with either fixed or removable implant-supported prostheses. [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Full-arch implant-supported prostheses have become a widely accepted solution for edentulous patients, yet long-term biological and mechanical complications remain a clinical concern. Methods: This retrospective study included 70 fully edentulous patients (362 implants) rehabilitated with either fixed or removable implant-supported prostheses. Data were collected on demographics, medical status, type and location of prostheses, implant type, abutments, method of fixation, and complications. Statistical analysis included Fisher’s exact test, the Mann–Whitney U test, and chi-squared tests, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Results: Mechanical complications occurred in 41.4% of patients (29 out of 70), with framework fractures reported in eight cases (27.6%), ceramic chipping in six cases (20.7%), and resin discoloration in four cases (13.8%). The prostheses were fabricated using monolithic zirconia, metal–ceramic crowns, zirconia on titanium bars, and hybrid resin/PMMA on cobalt–chromium frameworks. Gingival inflammation was also noted in 41.4% of cases (n = 29), predominantly in posterior implant regions. Younger patients and those without systemic diseases showed a significantly higher incidence of mechanical complications. Conclusions: Two years post-treatment, mechanical and biological complications appear to be independent phenomena, not significantly associated with most prosthetic variables. Patient-specific factors, particularly age and general health status, may have greater predictive value than prosthetic design. Limitations of the study include its retrospective design and the lack of radiographic data to assess peri-implant bone changes. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 396 KiB  
Systematic Review
Minimally Invasive Techniques in Posterior Atlanto-Axial Fixation: State of the Art and Systematic Review
by Gianpaolo Jannelli, Luca Paun, Cédric Y. Barrey, Paola Borrelli, Karl Schaller, Enrico Tessitore and Ivan Cabrilo
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4657; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134657 - 1 Jul 2025
Viewed by 415
Abstract
Background: The atlanto-axial segment is highly mobile and, therefore, prone to instability in the setting of inflammatory disease, infection, tumor or trauma. While minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques have gained acceptance in the thoracolumbar spine due to their advantages over traditional approaches, their [...] Read more.
Background: The atlanto-axial segment is highly mobile and, therefore, prone to instability in the setting of inflammatory disease, infection, tumor or trauma. While minimally invasive surgical (MIS) techniques have gained acceptance in the thoracolumbar spine due to their advantages over traditional approaches, their use at the atlanto-axial segment is controversial due to the surgical risk associated with its complex anatomy. To evaluate the current evidence on MIS atlanto-axial fixation, we carried out a systematic review of the literature and compared the reported results with those of open procedures. Methods: This systematic review follows PRISMA-DTA 2020 guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted in November 2023 across PubMed/Medline, Google Scholar and clinicaltrials.gov using specific keywords related to minimally invasive atlanto-axial fixation. Data regarding study characteristics, patient demographics, surgical techniques, and outcomes were extracted from included studies. Results: This systematic review included 13 articles reporting on the results of surgery in 305 patients, in whom a total of 683 screws were inserted through a posterior MIS approach. N = 162 screws were inserted using the Harms–Goel technique, while N = 521 were placed using the Magerl technique. N = 40 screws were inserted using navigation guidance, while N = 643 were introduced with fluoroscopy assistance. Eight screws were misplaced. A Vertebral Artery (VA) injury was reported in three patients. With a mean value of 26.2 ± 15.3 months, the rate of fusion ranged between 80% and 100%. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of MIS for posterior atlanto-axial fixation, which was achieved using Magerl transarticular screws in a large majority of cases. Despite technical challenges, MIS approaches appear to achieve satisfactory clinical and radiological outcomes with complication rates similar to those of open techniques. Future studies may help refine the indications for MIS and identify those cases better suited for open approaches. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Emerging Trends in Cervical Spine Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1367 KiB  
Article
Instrumentation-Related Complications Following Nonfusion Posterior Fixation in Patients with Metastatic Spinal Tumors: Incidence and Risk Factors
by Yunjin Nam, Jin-Sung Park, Dong-Ho Kang, Chong-Suh Lee, Seung Woo Suh and Se-Jun Park
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4629; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134629 - 30 Jun 2025
Viewed by 355
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Previous studies have reported satisfactory outcomes and low rates of instrumentation-related complications (IRCs) following nonfusion posterior fixation in patients with metastatic spinal tumors (MSTs). However, to adequately assess the longevity and durability of nonfusion instrumentation in patients with longer life expectancy, [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Previous studies have reported satisfactory outcomes and low rates of instrumentation-related complications (IRCs) following nonfusion posterior fixation in patients with metastatic spinal tumors (MSTs). However, to adequately assess the longevity and durability of nonfusion instrumentation in patients with longer life expectancy, an extended follow-up period is essential. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of and risk factors for IRCs in patients with MSTs who underwent nonfusion posterior fixation and had radiographic follow-up data available for at least one year postoperatively. Methods: Consecutive data were collected from patients who underwent pedicle screw-based posterior fixation without fusion for MSTs in the thoracic and/or lumbar region from 2005 to 2018. The IRCs included screw loosening, screw pull-out, and metal breakage. The IRC-free survival and related factors were analyzed by Kaplan–Meier survivorship analysis with the log-rank test within a minimum follow-up period of one year. A multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox proportional-hazards regression model. Results: In total, 61 patients were included. The mean follow-up period was 28.3 months (range: 12.0–102.6 months). There were 27 cases (44.2%) of IRCs, including 22 cases of screw loosening, four cases of screw pull-out, and one case of rod breakage, at an average of 9.6 months (range: 1.0–38.1 months). The median IRC-free survival was 38.1 months (range: 1.0–102.6 months). Only three patients experienced pain aggravation with IRCs. No revision surgery was performed. A multivariate analysis identified that fixation length was a risk factor for IRCs (odds ratio: 0.358, 95% confidence interval: 0.114–0.888; p = 0.027). Conclusions: IRCs are frequent but mostly asymptomatic after nonfusion posterior fixation in patients with MSTs followed up for at least one year. Overall, the IRC-free survival was long enough considering the patient survival. Fixation length was a significant risk factor for IRCs regardless of MST location. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Spine Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 1132 KiB  
Article
Ligamentotaxis Effect of Lateral Lumber Interbody Fusion and Cage Subsidence
by Ryosuke Tomio
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4554; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134554 - 26 Jun 2025
Viewed by 327
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) has gained popularity as an effective technique for indirect decompression through ligamentotaxis. Despite the perceived importance of using appropriately sized cages for achieving optimal decompression, comprehensive reports on cage size and its impact on indirect decompression [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) has gained popularity as an effective technique for indirect decompression through ligamentotaxis. Despite the perceived importance of using appropriately sized cages for achieving optimal decompression, comprehensive reports on cage size and its impact on indirect decompression are limited. This study aimed to assess the ligamentotaxis effect by measuring the “backward bulging” length in pre- and postoperative MRIs and examining its correlation with cage size and subsidence. Methods: T2 images of 270 patients with lumbar herniated disc and/or lumbar spondylolisthesis (June 2022 to March 2025) were analyzed for 530 intervertebral spaces. Data on gender, age, length of hospital stay, preoperative and postoperative lumbar JOA scores, and the level of the disease were collected. Measurements included backward bulging length, intervertebral height, and cage subsidence. Statistical analysis was performed using StatMate. Surgical procedures involved oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) to minimize impact on the iliopsoas and lumbar plexus. Trial cages starting from 8 mm were sequentially inserted, with confirmation through lateral fluoroscopy. Posterior fixation was performed using percutaneous pedicle screws. Results: Analysis of 530 intervertebral spaces revealed that 70% could accommodate a cage 3 mm or larger than the preoperative intervertebral height. Significant backward bulging shortening (3 mm or more) occurred in 339 spaces, predominantly with larger cages. Only 8.8% of cases (14/159) with a large backward bulging shortening had an intervertebral height extension of 3 mm or less. On the other hand, a large reduction in backward bulging was observed in 91.3% of cases (339/371) with an intervertebral height extension of 3 mm or more. Postoperative cage subsidence was observed in 9.2% (49/530) of all intervertebral spaces and 8.6% (32/371) in spaces where a cage larger than 3 mm was used. There was no statistically significant difference between these two groups. Conclusions: To achieve a sufficient ligamentotaxis effect, it is necessary to select a cage size that allows for an intervertebral height increase of at least 3 mm compared to the preoperative measurement. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Progress and Future Directions of Spine Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1902 KiB  
Communication
Innovative Pedicle Screw Insertion with Mixed Reality Technology Improves Insertion Accuracy in Spinal Surgery
by Shintaro Obata, Akira Shinohara, Daigo Arimura, Shunsuke Katsumi, Hiroki Wakiya and Mitsuru Saito
Sensors 2025, 25(13), 3939; https://doi.org/10.3390/s25133939 - 24 Jun 2025
Viewed by 1271
Abstract
The accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in pediatric scoliosis correction surgery using augmented reality technology in combination with a conventional navigation system was evaluated, and its usefulness was verified. A retrospective study of patients who underwent mixed reality technology-assisted posterior scoliosis correction and [...] Read more.
The accuracy of pedicle screw insertion in pediatric scoliosis correction surgery using augmented reality technology in combination with a conventional navigation system was evaluated, and its usefulness was verified. A retrospective study of patients who underwent mixed reality technology-assisted posterior scoliosis correction and fixation was conducted. In total, 361 pedicle screws inserted with a mixed reality technology-assisted navigation system were analyzed; 25 pedicle screws (6.9%) showed Rao Classification Grade 1 deviation, whereas 0.83% showed Rao Classification Grade 2.3 deviation, which is a clinical deviation. In terms of the relationship between the rotation of the vertebral body and the deviation of the pedicle screw, the pedicle screw tended to deviate more easily when it was necessary to insert the pedicle screw in a more strongly oblique position due to the rotation of the vertebral body. The results suggest that the pedicle screw insertion accuracy with augmented reality technology may be superior to that with conventional navigation alone in scoliosis correction and fusion surgery for scoliosis in children. This system is expected to become a standard support tool for spine surgery and will contribute to improving the success rate of surgery and reducing the burden on the surgeon. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 752 KiB  
Article
Flexible Syndesmotic Reconstruction with Two Suture Buttons Provides Equal Stability Compared to Syndesmotic Screws: A Biomechanical Study
by Alexander Milstrey, Vivienne Hoell, Ann-Sophie C. Weigel, Jens Wermers, Stella Gartung, Julia Evers, Michael J. Raschke and Sabine Ochman
Bioengineering 2025, 12(7), 685; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12070685 - 23 Jun 2025
Viewed by 347
Abstract
Background: This study investigated syndesmotic stability after transection and the effects of stabilization using rigid and dynamic reconstruction techniques. Methods: Syndesmotic stability was analyzed using a six-degree-of-freedom robotic arm on 14 human specimens. Stability was analyzed in the neutral position and [...] Read more.
Background: This study investigated syndesmotic stability after transection and the effects of stabilization using rigid and dynamic reconstruction techniques. Methods: Syndesmotic stability was analyzed using a six-degree-of-freedom robotic arm on 14 human specimens. Stability was analyzed in the neutral position and during dorsiflexion and plantar flexion using an external rotation stress test under an axial load of 200 Newtons. The examination was performed on intact and sequentially transected syndesmosis in the following order: (1) anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL); (2) interosseous ligament (IOL); and (3) posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL). Then, reconstruction was performed using different syndesmotic screw techniques or a dynamic Suture Button system (Arthrex TightRope; n = 7). Results: A syndesmotic transection mainly caused sagittal instability of the fibula. While both static and dynamic reconstruction provided stabilization, screw fixation, particularly with two screws and a plate, demonstrated superior control of the fibular movement, especially in the sagittal and transverse planes, compared to one Suture Button. Conclusions: The results suggest that syndesmotic stabilization with one Suture Button may be insufficient for cases involving three-ligamentous injuries, whereas two Suture Buttons may offer comparable biomechanical stability to syndesmotic screws. Additionally, the study suggests that lateral radiographs may provide additional clinical value in assessing syndesmotic stability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomechanics and Sports Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 2375 KiB  
Article
Stand-Alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L3-L4 with 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cages: A Safe and Effective Alternative in the Treatment of Degenerative Disc Disease (DDD)
by Luca Ricciardi, Andrea Perna, Sokol Trungu, Massimo Miscusi, Alba Scerrati, Annamaria Narciso, Salvatore Cracchiolo, Sara Favarato and Antonino Raco
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4233; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124233 - 14 Jun 2025
Viewed by 535
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) remains a debated approach in spinal surgery, with limited published evidence supporting its efficacy without supplemental fixation. This prospective study presents the institutional case series on single-level L3-L4 stand-alone LLIF, using next-generation 3D-printed titanium cages, as [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) remains a debated approach in spinal surgery, with limited published evidence supporting its efficacy without supplemental fixation. This prospective study presents the institutional case series on single-level L3-L4 stand-alone LLIF, using next-generation 3D-printed titanium cages, as treatment for degenerative disc disease (DDD). Methods: A cohort of 49 patients with symptomatic DDD, unresponsive to conservative therapy, underwent stand-alone LLIF at L3-L4 (neither posterior pedicle screws nor lateral plating). Clinical outcomes (VAS and ODI) and radiological parameters (disc height, segmental/lumbar lordosis) were collected preoperatively and at 1, 6, and 12 months. Repeated-measures ANOVA with Bonferroni correction was adopted for statistical analysis. Results: Significant improvements were observed in pain and disability scores at all time points, with the mean VAS score decreasing from 6.53 to 0.29, and ODI from 27.6% to 3.84% at one year (p < 0.001). Radiographic analysis confirmed durable increases in disc height and segmental lordosis. Solid fusion was achieved in 97.9% of cases. No patient required posterior revision; transient neurological symptoms were mild and self-limiting. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that stand-alone LLIF at L3-L4 is safe and effective in achieving stable fusion and clinical–radiological improvement. These results challenge the necessity of supplemental fixation and support the broader adoption of a less invasive fusion paradigm. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advances in Spine Disorders)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 601 KiB  
Review
Impact of Dual Antibiotic Prophylaxis on 90-Day Surgical Site Infection Rates Following Posterior Spinal Fusion for Juvenile Scoliosis: A Single-Center Study of 296 Cases
by Paolo Brigato, Davide Palombi, Leonardo Oggiano, Sergio De Salvatore, Alessandro Rogani, Sergio Sessa and Pier Francesco Costici
Medicina 2025, 61(6), 1046; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina61061046 - 6 Jun 2025
Viewed by 644
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Surgical site infections (SSIs) significantly impact pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Considering the increased risk of Gram-negative infections in neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS), broader antibiotic coverage could be advantageous. Some studies suggest extending this approach to all scoliosis etiologies to reduce SSI [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Surgical site infections (SSIs) significantly impact pediatric spinal deformity surgery. Considering the increased risk of Gram-negative infections in neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS), broader antibiotic coverage could be advantageous. Some studies suggest extending this approach to all scoliosis etiologies to reduce SSI rates. This study evaluates whether a dual antibiotic prophylaxis with cephalosporin and aminoglycoside reduces SSI incidence within 90 days postsurgery in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), NMS, and syndromic scoliosis (SS) patients. Materials and Methods: This study included pediatric patients with AIS, NMS, or SS curves, treated with posterior spinal fusion between January 2019 and December 2022, with a minimum two-year follow-up. The primary outcome was early SSI incidence and its correlation with dual antibiotic prophylaxis in pediatric scoliosis surgery. Secondary outcomes included operative data, blood loss, hemoglobin levels, hospital stay, complications, pelvic fixation, and radiographic correction and how these factors could be identified as potential risk factors for SSIs. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze antibiotic regimen, SSI risk, and perioperative variables using chi-square, Mann–Whitney U, ANOVA, and Cox regression. Significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: The study included 296 patients: 222 with AIS, 46 with NMS, and 28 with SS. Ninety days postsurgery, SSI rates were 1.2% in AIS (0.8% deep, 0.4% superficial), 6.5% in NMS (all superficial), and 3.5% in SS (all superficial). Deep SSIs in AIS were associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). None of the cases required implant removal. Univariate Cox regression did not reveal any statistically significant predictors for SSIs. However, older age at surgery showed a protective trend, while higher preoperative ASA scores seemed to be a negative prognostic factor (respectively p = 0.051 and p = 0.08). Conclusions: Dual antibiotic prophylaxis with cefazolin and amikacin was associated with a lower SSI rate after posterior spinal fusion for scoliosis, with no adverse events. Further studies are needed to refine dosage, timing, and duration. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Diagnosis and Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 976 KiB  
Article
Sutureless Scleral-Fixated Soleko Fil Carlevale Intraocular Lens and Associated Pars Plana Vitrectomy in Aphakia Management: A National Multicenter Audit
by Lorena Ferrer-Alapont, Carolina Bernal-Morales, Manuel J. Navarro, Diego Ruiz-Casas, Claudia García-Arumí, Juan Manuel Cubero-Parra, Jose Vicente Dabad-Moreno, Daniel Velázquez-Villoria, Joaquín Marticorena, Julián Zarco-Bosquet, Félix Armada-Maresca, Cristina Irigoyen, Juan-Francisco Santamaría-Álvarez, Pablo Carnota-Méndez, Idaira Sánchez-Santos, Nuria Olivier-Pascual, Francisco Javier Ascaso and Javier Zarranz-Ventura
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(11), 3963; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113963 - 4 Jun 2025
Viewed by 850
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of sutureless scleral-fixated (SSF) Soleko Fil Carlevale intraocular lens (SC-IOL) implants associated with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in patients with aphakia secondary to complicated cataract surgery or IOL luxation nationwide. Methods: [...] Read more.
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of sutureless scleral-fixated (SSF) Soleko Fil Carlevale intraocular lens (SC-IOL) implants associated with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in patients with aphakia secondary to complicated cataract surgery or IOL luxation nationwide. Methods: A multicenter, national, retrospective study of 268 eyes (268 patients) which underwent simultaneous PPV and SC-IOL implantation was conducted. Demographics; ocular data; pre-surgical, surgical and post-surgical details; and refractive results were collected. Intra- and postoperative complications and management details were described. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were collected at 1 week and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months post-surgery. Kaplan–Meier curves were constructed to assess the cumulative probability of postoperative BCVA, IOP levels, macular edema (ME) and corneal decompensation. Results: The cumulative probability of final VA ≤ 0.3 logMAR was 64.4% at 12 months follow-up. The probability of IOP > 21, ≥25 and ≥30 mmHg was 29.8%, 16.9% and 10.1%, respectively, and the cumulative probability of IOP-lowering treatment was 42.3% at 12 months. Glaucoma surgery was required in 3.7% of the eyes (10/268). The cumulative probability of postoperative ME development was 26.6% at 12 months, managed with topical treatment alone (73.5%) and intravitreal injections (26.5%). Corneal transplantation was required in 3.7% of the eyes (10/268). Conclusions: Sutureless scleral-fixated SC-IOL is an adequate therapeutic alternative in the management of aphakia with good visual results and an acceptable safety profile in routine clinical care. Longer-term studies are needed to evaluate its results and complications compared to other therapeutic alternatives. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Ophthalmology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 6708 KiB  
Article
Lateral Cortical Fixation as the Optimal Strategy for Achieving Stability in Rib Fractures: A Patient-Specific Finite Element Analysis
by Xiang Zhang, Xuejun Lan, Wang Shen and Qinghua Zhou
Bioengineering 2025, 12(6), 594; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12060594 - 31 May 2025
Viewed by 535
Abstract
The surgical stabilization of rib fractures helps maintain chest wall stability and reduces respiratory complications. This study aimed to identify the key biomechanical parameters for evaluating the stability of rib fracture fixation using finite element analysis (FEA) and compare four rib fixation configurations—intramedullary [...] Read more.
The surgical stabilization of rib fractures helps maintain chest wall stability and reduces respiratory complications. This study aimed to identify the key biomechanical parameters for evaluating the stability of rib fracture fixation using finite element analysis (FEA) and compare four rib fixation configurations—intramedullary rib splint (IRS), locking plate (LP), claw-shape plate, and intrathoracic plate (IP)—using biomechanical analysis. Forty patient-specific FEA models of fourth-rib fractures were constructed using the computed tomography scans of 10 patients. Maximum implant displacement (MID), maximum rib fracture displacement, maximum implant von Mises stress (MIVMS), maximum rib von Mises stress, maximum rib strain, and maximum interfragmentary gap (MIG) were assessed by simulating the anterior and posterior loads on the ribs during postoperative frontal collision. The fixation stabilities were evaluated using entropy scores. MIVMS, MIG, and MID exhibited the highest weighting coefficients. Lateral cortical fixation strategies, particularly LP configuration, demonstrated superior biomechanical performance compared with IRS and IP systems. The composite score of the LP was significantly higher than that of the other modalities. MIVMS, MIG, and MID were identified as critical parameters for evaluating the rib fracture fixation stability, and the lateral cortical fixation strategy (LP) enhanced the structural stability of rib fracture fixation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomechanics and Sports Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

8 pages, 829 KiB  
Brief Report
Unicortical Locking Screws Provide Comparable Rigidity to Bicortical Compression Screws in Tranverse Mid-Shaft Clavicle Fracture Plate Fixation Constructs
by Curtis W. Hartman, Nicholas C. Branting, Matthew A. Mormino, Timothy J. Lackner, Bradford P. Zitsch, Edward V. Fehringer and Hani Haider
Clin. Pract. 2025, 15(6), 101; https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15060101 - 26 May 2025
Viewed by 316
Abstract
Background: Mid-shaft clavicle fracture fixation carries neurovascular injury risk. The purpose of this study was to compare bicortical compression and unicortical locked clavicle plate constructs biomechanically. Materials and Methods: Ten fourth-generation composite transverse mid-shaft clavicle osteotomy specimens were assigned to two [...] Read more.
Background: Mid-shaft clavicle fracture fixation carries neurovascular injury risk. The purpose of this study was to compare bicortical compression and unicortical locked clavicle plate constructs biomechanically. Materials and Methods: Ten fourth-generation composite transverse mid-shaft clavicle osteotomy specimens were assigned to two groups, and each clavicle was fixed with an eight-hole second-generation 3.5 mm pelvic reconstruction plate placed superiorly. Group one included five fixed with bicortical compression screws and group two included five fixed with unicortical locking screws. All were tested on a four-axis servohydraulic testing frame in three modes: axial rotation, anterior/posterior bending, and cephalad/caudad bending. Results: Mean construct stiffness for AP bending was 1.255 ± 0.058 Nm/deg (group 1) and 1.442 ± 0.065 Nm/deg (group 2) (p = 0.001). Mean construct stiffness for axial rotation was 0.701 ± 0.08 Nm/deg (1) and 0.726 ± 0.03 Nm/deg (2) (p = 0.581). Mean construct stiffness for cephalad bending was 0.889 ± 0.064 Nm/deg (1) and 0.880 ± 0.044 Nm/deg (2) (p = 0.807). Mean construct stiffness for caudal bending was 2.523 ± 0.29 Nm/deg (1) and 2.774 ± 0.25 Nm/deg (2) (p = 0.182). Conclusions: With transverse mid-shaft clavicle fractures, unicortical locking fixation provided comparable rigidity to bicortical compression fixation in axial rotation, cephalad bending, and caudal bending; it provided greater rigidity in AP bending. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 2023 KiB  
Article
Comparison of the Isometric Position of the External Elbow Fixator: Self-Centering Versus Traditional Techniques, Postoperative CT Evaluation, and 3D Motion Analysis
by Prospero Bigazzi, Chiara Suardi, Anna Rosa Rizzo, Irene Felici, Marco Biondi, Andrea Poggetti and Sandra Pfanner
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(11), 3653; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14113653 - 23 May 2025
Viewed by 304
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The external hinged elbow fixator is a surgical choice both in the case of simple dislocations and elbow dislocation fractures. The correct positioning with respect to the elbow’s center of rotation is demanding. Authors developed a self-centering external fixator that does [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The external hinged elbow fixator is a surgical choice both in the case of simple dislocations and elbow dislocation fractures. The correct positioning with respect to the elbow’s center of rotation is demanding. Authors developed a self-centering external fixator that does not require a pin in the elbow’s center of rotation. The aim of this study was to analyze the margin of error in its positioning. Methods: We subjected 16 patients to a CT-3D study reconstruction using 3D motion software to analyze the divergence angle and offset between the elbow’s center of rotation and that of the external fixator. The results were compared to those published on traditional implants. Results: All elbows were correctly reduced without re-dislocation. The average distance was 2° in relation to the center of rotation in the antero-posterior view, 3° in the cranio-caudal, and 2° in the medio-lateral. The divergence angle was 3.5° (min 0.4°; max 9.3°) and the offset 6.8 mm (min 0.06; max 17.5). The average range of motion was 10–145 (range 0–155). Discussion: The traditional hinged elbow external fixator creates severe complexity for surgeons in the necessary positioning of the elbow axial rod to correctly align the implant. The self-centering device avoids this step, making the procedure faster and easier. Although the alignment is still not perfect, the results are still comparable with traditional devices. Conclusions: The self-centering external fixator allows for correct alignment with the elbow’s center of rotation. It is less invasive and simpler, with a shorter learning curve, faster operating time, and less radiographic exposure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2404 KiB  
Systematic Review
Are Implant-Supported Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns a Viable Alternative to Metal-Ceramics? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Liandra Constantina da Mota Fonseca, Daniele Sorgatto Faé, Beatriz Neves Fernandes, Izabela da Costa, Jean Soares Miranda and Cleidiel Aparecido Araujo Lemos
Ceramics 2025, 8(2), 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/ceramics8020063 - 22 May 2025
Viewed by 765
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate prosthetic complications, implant survival rates, and marginal bone loss in implant-supported monolithic restorations compared to metal-ceramic restorations. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251022336) and conducted following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and PRISMA guidelines. [...] Read more.
This study aimed to evaluate prosthetic complications, implant survival rates, and marginal bone loss in implant-supported monolithic restorations compared to metal-ceramic restorations. The study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251022336) and conducted following the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions and PRISMA guidelines. A systematic search was conducted in the electronic databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and ProQuest for articles published up to December 2024. The inclusion criteria comprised studies evaluating only randomized clinical trials that evaluated implant-supported monolithic restorations directly compared to metal-ceramic restorations, considering any type of ceramic material and regardless of the fixation system (screw-retained or cemented), with a minimum follow-up of one year. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software, and the risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using the RoB 2.0 and GRADE tools, respectively. A total of six studies were included, all of which exclusively evaluated monolithic zirconia single crowns over follow-up periods ranging from 1 to 3 years. None of the included studies evaluated fixed partial dentures or restorative materials other than monolithic zirconia. In total, 267 patients (mean age range: 18–57 years) were analyzed, with a total of 174 implant-supported monolithic zirconia crowns and 165 metal-ceramic single crowns in the posterior region (premolars and molars). The meta-analysis revealed that implant-supported monolithic zirconia single crowns exhibited significantly fewer prosthetic complications compared to metal-ceramic single crowns (p < 0.0001; Risk Ratio [RR]: 0.26; Confidence Interval [CI]: 0.14–0.47). However, no statistically significant differences were observed between implant-supported monolithic zirconia and metal-ceramic single crowns regarding implant survival rates (p = 0.36; RR: 1.66; CI: 0.56–4.94) or marginal bone loss (p = 0.15; Mean Difference [MD]: −0.05; CI: −0.11–0.02). The risk of bias assessment indicated that four studies had a low risk of bias. However, the certainty of evidence was classified as low for prosthetic complications and implant survival rates and very low for marginal bone loss. Within the limitations of this review, it can be concluded that implant-supported monolithic zirconia single crowns can be considered a favorable treatment option as they show comparable implant survival and bone stability to metal-ceramic crowns, with a potential reduction in short-term prosthetic complications such as screw loosening and ceramic chipping. However, due to the limited number of studies included and low certainty of evidence, further long-term research is still needed to confirm their clinical performance over time. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop