Search Results (257)

Background and Aims: Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (S-AKI) is common and is associated with poor outcomes. This prospective observational study aimed to assess the predictive value of four novel biomarkers—syndecan-1 (SDC1), neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), proenkephalin (PENK), and presepsin (PSPN)—for renal outcomes and mortality in septic ICU patients. Methods: Serum biomarker levels were measured in serum samples collected at the time of sepsis diagnosis on the basis of the Sepsis-3 criteria. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined according to the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines, and patients were grouped by the presence of AKI, renal replacement therapy requirement (RRT), and intensive care unit (ICU) survival. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, and severity score data were compared between groups to evaluate the predictive performance of biomarkers and clinical parameters. Results: Of the 140 septic patients included, 55.0% developed AKI, 17.2% required RRT, and the ICU mortality rate was 50.0%. SDC1 was independently associated with both AKI (OR: 1.201; p = 0.024) and RRT initiation (OR: 1.260; p = 0.004). It also demonstrated the highest predictive performance for RRT (AUC: 0.715; p = 0.001) and a significant AUC for AKI evaluation (AUC: 0.659; p = 0.002). NGAL levels were significantly elevated in patients with AKI and higher SOFA scores but were not independently predictive. PENK and PSPN were not significantly associated with any renal outcome or mortality. The combined SOFA–SDC1 model improved discrimination for both AKI (AUC: 0.770) and RRT (AUC: 0.737), surpassing individual predictors. Conclusions: SDC1 emerged as the most reliable biomarker for assessing AKI and predicting the need for RRT, highlighting its potential role in early renal risk stratification among critically ill patients. Full article

Background and Objectives: Severe sepsis complicated by refractory shock is associated with high mortality. Adding continuous hemofiltration to venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may accelerate clearance of inflammatory mediators and improve haemodynamic stability, but evidence remains limited. We analysed 44 consecutive septic-shock patients treated with combined ECMO-hemofiltration (ECMO group) and compared them with 92 septic-shock patients managed without ECMO or renal replacement therapy (non-ECMO group). Methods: This retrospective single-centre study reviewed adults admitted between January 2018 and March 2025. Demographic, haemodynamic, laboratory and outcome data were extracted from electronic records. Primary outcome was 28-day mortality; secondary outcomes included intensive-care-unit (ICU) length-of-stay, vasopressor-free days, and change in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at 72 h. Results: Baseline age (49.2 ± 15.3 vs. 52.6 ± 16.1 years; p = 0.28) and APACHE II (27.8 ± 5.7 vs. 26.9 ± 6.0; p = 0.41) were comparable. At 24 h, mean arterial pressure rose from 52.3 ± 7.4 mmHg to 67.8 ± 9.1 mmHg in the ECMO group (mean change [∆] + 15.5 mmHg, p < 0.001). Controls exhibited a modest 4.9 mmHg rise that did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.07). Inflammatory markers decreased more sharply with ECMO (IL-6 ∆ −778 pg mL⁻¹ vs. −248 pg mL⁻¹, p < 0.001). SOFA fell by 3.6 ± 2.2 points with ECMO versus 1.6 ± 2.4 in controls (p = 0.01). Twenty-eight-day mortality did not differ (40.9% vs. 48.9%, p = 0.43), but ICU stay was longer with ECMO (median 12.5 vs. 9.3 days, p = 0.002). ΔIL-6 correlated with ΔSOFA (ρ = 0.46, p = 0.004). Conclusions: ECMO-assisted hemofiltration improved early haemodynamics and organ-failure scores and accelerated cytokine clearance, although crude mortality remained unchanged. Larger prospective trials are warranted to clarify survival benefit and optimal patient selection. Full article

Objective: To evaluate the prognostic utility of the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 (SAPS 3) in COVID-19 patients and assess whether incorporating C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, lactate, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) enhances their predictive accuracy. Methods: Single-center, observational, cohort study. We analyzed a database of adult ICU patients with severe or critical COVID-19 treated at a large academic center. We used binary logistic regression for all analyses. We assessed the predictive performance of SAPS 3 and SOFA scores within 24 h of admission, individually and in combination with serum lactate, LDH, CRP, and procalcitonin. We examined the independent association of these biomarkers with hospital mortality. We evaluated discrimination using the C-statistic and determined clinical utility with decision curve analysis. Results: We included 1395 patients, 66% of whom required mechanical ventilation, and 59.7% needed vasopressor support. Patients who died (39.7%) were significantly older (61.1 ± 15.9 years vs. 50.1 ± 14.5 years, p < 0.001) and had more comorbidities than survivors. Among the biomarkers, only procalcitonin was independently associated with higher mortality in the multivariable analysis, in a non-linear pattern. The AUROC for predicting hospital mortality was 0.771 (95% CI: 0.746–0.797) for SAPS 3 and 0.781 (95% CI: 0.756–0.805) for the SOFA score. A model incorporating the SOFA score, age, and procalcitonin demonstrated high AUROC of 0.837 (95% CI: 0.816–0.859). These associations with the SOFA score showed greater clinical utility. Conclusions: The SOFA score may aid clinical decision-making, and incorporating procalcitonin and age could further enhance its prognostic utility. Full article

Background and Objectives: Immunodeficiency associated with aging comorbidities increases the vulnerability of geriatric patients to sepsis. Early recognition and management of sepsis are essential in this population. This study evaluated the relationships between RDW, MPV, and MPV/PLT ratios and mortality in geriatric sepsis patients. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted between 2020 and 2024 in the Intensive Care Unit of the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation at a university hospital. Patients aged ≥ 65 years with a SOFA score of ≥2 were included. Demographic data (sex, age, height, weight, and BMI), hemogram parameters (RDW, MPV, and PLT), blood gas, and biochemical values were analyzed. Furthermore, their comorbidities; site of infection; ICU length of stay; vital signs; and SOFA, APACHE II, and SAPS II scores, recorded within the first 24 h following ICU admission, were evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed using the chi-square test, Student’s t-test, the Mann–Whitney U test, the Monte Carlo exact test, and ROC analysis. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: A total of 247 patients were included, with 46.2% (n = 114) classified as non-survivors during the 28-day follow-up period. Among them, 64.9% (n = 74) were male, with a mean age of 78.22 ± 8.53 years. Significant differences were also found in SOFA, APACHE-II, and SAPS-II scores between non-survivors and survivors (SOFA: 7.64 ± 3.16 vs. 6.78 ± 2.78, p = 0.023; APACHE-II: 21.31 ± 6.36 vs. 19.27 ± 5.88, p = 0.009; SAPS-II: 53.15 ± 16.04 vs. 46.93 ± 14.64, p = 0.002). On days 1, 3, and 5, the MPV/PLT ratio demonstrated a statistically significant predictive value for 28-day mortality. The optimal cut-off values were >0.03 on day 1 (AUC: 0.580, 95% CI: 0.516–0.642, sensitivity: 72.81%, specificity: 65.91%, p = 0.027), >0.04 on day 3 (AUC: 0.602, 95% CI: 0.538–0.663, sensitivity: 60.53%, specificity: 60.61%, p = 0.005), and >0.04 on day 5 (AUC: 0.618, 95% CI: 0.554–0.790, sensitivity: 66.14%, specificity: 62.88%, p = 0.001). Conclusions: The MPV and MPV/PLT ratios demonstrated statistically significant but limited predictive value for 28-day mortality in geriatric patients with sepsis. In contrast, the limited prognostic value of RDW may be related to variability in the inflammatory response and other underlying conditions. The correlations found between SOFA, APACHE II, and SAPS II scores highlight their importance in mortality risk prediction. Full article

Background/Objectives: Hospitalized peripartum patients who later decompensate and require an upgrade to the intensive care unit (ICU) may have an increased risk for poor outcomes. Most of the literature regarding the need for ICU involves Modified Early Warning Scores in already hospitalized patients or the evaluation of specific comorbid conditions or diagnoses. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the differences in clinical scores at admission among adult peripartum patients to identify the later need for ICU. Methods: We systematically searched Ovid-Medline, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Google Scholar for randomized and observational studies of adult patients ≥18 years of age who were ≥20 weeks pregnant or up to 40 days post-partum, were admitted to the wards from the emergency department and later required critical care services. The primary outcome was the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. Secondary outcomes included other clinical scores, the hospital length of stay (HLOS) and mortality. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale was utilized to grade quality. Descriptive analyses were performed to report demographic data, with means (±standard deviation [SD]) for continuous data and percentages for categorical data. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for all outcomes when at least two studies reported a common outcome. Results: Seven studies met the criteria, with a total of 1813 peripartum patients. The mean age was 27.2 (±2.36). Patients with ICU upgrades were associated with larger differences in mean SOFA scores. The pooled difference in means was 2.76 (95% CI 1.07–4.46, p < 0.001). There were statistically significant increases in Sepsis in Obstetrics Scores, APACHE II scores, and HLOS in ICU upgrade patients. There was a non-significantly increased risk of mortality in ICU upgrade patients. There was high overall heterogeneity between patient characteristics and management in our included studies. Conclusions: This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated higher SOFA or other physiologic scores in ICU upgrade patients compared to those who remained on the wards. ICU upgrade patients were also associated with a longer HLOS and higher mortality compared with control patients. Full article

Background/Objectives: Acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is a significant condition commonly seen in intensive care units (ICUs), yet specific prognostic markers related to it for mortality remain largely unstudied. This study aimed to identify parameters that influence mortality in ICU patients diagnosed with type 1 respiratory failure. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital, including patients admitted to the ICU between March 2016 and March 2020. The study included patients with type 1 respiratory failure, while exclusion criteria were prior long-term respiratory support, type 2 respiratory failure, and early mortality (<24 h). Data on demographics, comorbidities, support requirements, laboratory values, and ICU scoring systems (APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS II, NUTRIC) were collected. Binomial regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors of 30-day mortality. Results: Out of 657 patients screened, 253 met the inclusion criteria (mean age 70.6 ± 15.6 years; 65.6% male). Non-survivors (n = 131) had significantly higher CCI scores; greater vasopressor requirements; and elevated SAPS II, APACHE, SOFA, and NUTRIC scores. Laboratory findings indicated higher inflammatory markers and lower nutritional markers (albumin and prealbumin, respectively) among non-survivors. In the regression model, SAPS II (OR: 13.38, p = 0.003), the need for inotropic support (OR: 1.11, p = 0.048), NUTRIC score (OR: 2.75, p = 0.014), and serum albumin (inverse; OR: 1.52, p = 0.001) were independently associated with mortality. The model had an AUC of 0.926 and classified 83.2% of cases correctly. When combined, SAPS II and mNUTRIC had more AUC compared to either standalone scoring. Conclusions: SAPS II, vasopressor requirements, mNUTRIC score, and low serum albumin are independent predictors of 30-day mortality in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. These findings support the integration of nutritional assessment, a combination of available scoring systems and comprehensive scoring into routine ICU evaluations for this patient group. Full article

Background: Pressure ulcers (PUs) remain a prevalent complication in intensive care unit (ICU) settings, especially among immobilized patients. The impact of structured, nursing-led mobilization protocols on PU prevention and recovery remains underexplored. Objective: To evaluate the impact of nursing-led mobilization protocols on the incidence and progression of PUs in critically ill patients. Methods: In this retrospective observational cohort study, 188 ICU patients were admitted during one of two consecutive periods of care: conventional care (6-hourly repositioning) and an advanced nursing-led protocol (3-hourly repositioning with support surfaces and specialized nurse training), which replaced conventional care as standard in our institution. The primary outcome included new PU development for patients with no pre-existing ulcers or worsening/non-progression of pre-existing ulcers at discharge; ICU mortality was evaluated as a secondary outcome. Results: Among patients without pre-existing ulcers (n = 155), new PU incidence did not significantly differ between groups, even after adjusting for SOFA score (OR 0.40, 95% CI: 0.05 TO 3.17; p = 0.374). However, in patients with pre-existing ulcers (n = 33), the advanced care group showed improvement (53.3% versus 0% in the conventional group, OR 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01–0.64; p = 0.012); this effect was independent of initial SOFA score. Mortality was associated with the SOFA score, but not with the type of care. Conclusions: While advanced nursing-led mobilization did not reduce PU incidence, it significantly improved existing ulcer outcomes. Findings support the integration of structured protocols for high-risk ICU patients, especially those with existing ulcers. Full article

Background/Objectives: ST-segment deviation (STD) on electrocardiography (ECG) may reflect myocardial injury in critically ill patients. However, its prognostic significance in non-cardiac intensive care unit (ICU) populations remains unclear. We aimed to assess the association between STD on ICU admission and 30-day mortality and to evaluate its incremental prognostic value beyond the SOFA score. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, we included 307 consecutive ICU patients (median age: 64.0 years; 65.5% men). Patients with acute cardiac conditions were excluded. STD was defined as ≥1 mm ST elevation or depression in any lead on standard 12-lead ECG performed on admission. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Prognostic associations were assessed using multivariable Cox regression adjusted for SOFA score. Discriminative performance was evaluated by comparing ROC curves for models with and without STD, with bootstrap-based testing (1000 iterations) to assess significance. Results: STD was present in 126 patients (41.0%) and occurred more frequently in non-survivors (47.6% vs. 36.5%, p = 0.033. In Cox regression, STD was independently associated with 30-day mortality (HR = 1.534; 95% CI: 1.081–2.177; p = 0.017), even after adjustment for SOFA score. This association remained statistically robust in bootstrap validation. The addition of STD amplitude to the SOFA score modestly improved model discrimination with a borderline significant difference between the areas under the curve (ΔAUC = 0.005, p = 0.0581). Conclusions: ST-segment deviation on the admission ECG is an independent predictor of 30-day mortality in non-cardiac critically ill patients and may enhance risk stratification beyond the SOFA score. Full article

Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) plays a vital role in cellular growth, development, and survival. Incorporating IGFBP-3 into baseline prognostic evaluations may enhance the prediction of mortality in patients with sepsis. In this study, serum levels of IGFBP-3, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, lactate, interleukin-6, and mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin were measured upon admission to the internal medicine unit (IMU) in 139 patients with microbiologically confirmed sepsis. The objectives were as follows: (1) to classify septic patient phenotypes based on optimal thresholds of independent prognostic biomarkers and (2) to evaluate whether these biomarkers improve the predictive accuracy of a clinical model (Model 1), which includes the clinical predictors of 1-year mortality. Age, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, multiple sources of infection, and IGFBP-3 levels independently predicted 1-year mortality. Patients with IGFBP-3 levels below 10.64 had significantly lower median body temperature (p = 0.008), reduced lymphocyte count (p = 0.001), and higher 1-year mortality (p < 0.001). Model 1 included age, SOFA score, and the presence of multiple sources of sepsis as predictor variables. Model 2 incorporated the same variables as Model 1, with the addition of IGFBP-3 levels. When comparing their prognostic performance, Model 2 demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for mortality at 60, 90, and 365 days following admission to the IMU. Low IGFBP-3 levels at IMU admission are strongly associated with worse outcomes in septic patients, supporting its potential use as a prognostic biomarker. Full article

Background: Prognostic scoring systems are applied in intensive care units (ICUs) to monitor patients’ responses to treatment and guide treatment modalities. These scoring systems are also used as predictors in sepsis, where mortality rates are high. This study aims to compare the scores (APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS II, OASIS) in terms of their role in predicting overall mortality in patients admitted to ICUs with a diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock. Methods: Among 740 patients admitted to the tertiary intensive care unit within a 2-year period, 165 patients diagnosed with sepsis and septic shock were included in the study. Demographic data, comorbidities, SOFA, SAPSII, OASIS, and APACHE II scores, invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation requirements and durations, ICU admissions, hospital stays, and 28-day mortalities were retrospectively evaluated. Results: All scoring systems were positively correlated with mortality and CCI score. SAPS II and OASIS showed a higher correlation with mortality compared to other scoring systems, correlated with ICU admission and mechanical ventilation, unlike other scoring systems. The AUC values for the APACHE II, SOFA, SAPS II, and OASIS were 0.803, 0.873, 0.902, and 0.879, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found between the scores (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Compared to commonly used scoring systems, OASIS is a practical tool and serves as a robust scoring system for assessing mortality in ICU patients diagnosed with sepsis. Full article

Background: Septic shock is a heterogeneous syndrome with diverse clinical presentations and pathophysiology, yet current management guidelines largely treat it as a homogenous entity. Early risk stratification relies on lactate and different predictive scoring systems, which may not capture the underlying heterogeneity in host responses. Aim: To identify discrete subphenotypes of septic shock using admission demographics and laboratory parameters, and to evaluate their relationship with in-hospital outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of 10,462 adult patients with ICD-10-defined septic shock admitted to intensive care units between 2014 and 2015. We used Two-Step Cluster Analysis using log-likelihood distance and the Bayesian Information Criterion to identify two distinct phenotypes. We compared clusters on baseline characteristics, in-hospital outcomes including mortality, days on mechanical ventilation, vasopressor use, acute kidney injury (AKI), AKI requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT), and ICU and hospital lengths of stay. Results: We identified two clusters (Cluster 1, n = 5355 and Cluster 2, n = 5107) in our study. Cluster 1 showed greater biochemical severity at presentation, including higher median lactate (2.40 vs. 2.20 mmol L⁻¹; p < 0.001), serum creatinine (1.39 vs. 1.20 mg dL⁻¹; p < 0.001), blood urea nitrogen (28 vs. 25 mg dL⁻¹; p < 0.001), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (11.12 vs. 10.38; p < 0.001), and a higher mean SOFA score (7.05 ± 3.85 vs. 6.76 ± 3.87; p < 0.001). Despite this, Cluster 1 required mechanical ventilation more frequently (46.1% vs. 42.2%; p < 0.001) and had a higher incidence of AKI (58.1% vs. 55.6%; p = 0.009), including more stage 3 AKI (17.2% vs. 15.2%; p < 0.001) and dialysis (6.6% vs. 5.2%; p = 0.005), yet experienced similar in-hospital mortality (15.4% vs. 15.8%; p = 0.615) and comparable ICU (2.18 vs. 2.26 days; p = 0.254) and hospital lengths of stay (6.63 vs. 6.80 days; p = 0.251). Conclusions: Two septic shock phenotypes were identified, one with marked early organ dysfunction (Cluster 1) and another with milder initial derangements (Cluster 2), yet both showed convergent short-term mortality and lengths of stay despite divergent support needs. These results challenge reliance on single-parameter severity markers and underscore the need for phenotype-guided risk stratification and personalized management strategies in septic shock. Full article

Background/Objectives: Weaning failure remains a major challenge in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. This study aimed to describe outcomes in patients ventilated for >14 days and identify specific predictors of weaning success. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 88 patients from the Soroka University Medical Center database was conducted. Outcomes in the successful weaning (SW) group were compared to those in the failed weaning (FW) group. Predictors of weaning success were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Results: Forty patients (45%) were successfully weaned and discharged to rehabilitation or home. In-hospital mortality was 28%, with deaths occurring exclusively in the FW group (p < 0.001). One-month and one-year post-discharge all-cause mortality rates were 11% and 28%, respectively, with no group differences. Hypoalbuminemia and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at admission significantly predicted weaning failure (odds ratio: 5.71 and 0.54, respectively). Demographics, comorbidities, ventilation indications, admission data, and diuretic use were not predictive. Conclusions: Hypoalbuminemia and the SOFA score at admission were key predictors of weaning success in patients ventilated for more than 2 weeks. Age and comorbidities were not significant. Prospective studies on albumin supplementation and high-protein diets are warranted to assess their impact on weaning outcomes. Full article

Background/Objectives: The phase angle (PhA) is an emerging biomarker reflecting the cellular integrity and nutritional status. This study aimed to explore potential associations between the PhA, clinical severity scores, and 60-day survival outcomes following an admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Methods: This prospective, single-center study included 43 critically ill patients admitted to the ICU at Evangelismos General Hospital between May and November 2024. Patients were stratified by their PhA (≤5.4° vs. >5.4°). The PhA was measured at admission and subsequently on days 5–7, 10–11, 13–14, and until discharge. Severity scores (SOFA and APACHE II) were recorded. Between-group differences were assessed using independent samples t-tests and Mann–Whitney U tests, as appropriate. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: The mean age was 54.6 ± 17 years; 63.6% were male. At ICU admission, patients with a PhA > 5.4° were significantly younger (p < 0.001) and had a higher fat-free mass (p < 0.001), greater calf circumference (p < 0.001), higher extracellular water (p < 0.001), larger mid-upper arm circumference (p = 0.009), and higher resting energy expenditure per kilogram (27.4 vs. 23.1 kcal/kg, p = 0.002). The PhA declined significantly during the ICU stay (p < 0.001). The Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a significantly shorter survival in patients with a PhA ≤ 5.4° (HR: 6.32, p = 0.019), which remained significant after adjusting for sepsis (p = 0.017). In a multivariable Cox regression, both PhA and APACHE II scores independently predicted mortality. Conclusions: While limited by a small sample size and single-center design, these findings support the further exploration of the PhA as a monitoring tool in critical care. Full article

Background and Objectives: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) triggers a dysregulated host response that may culminate in refractory hypoxaemic shock. Whether veno-venous ECMO modifies the inflammatory cascade more effectively in COVID-19 than in other septic states, and how it compares with conventional ventilatory support for COVID-19, remains uncertain. We compared three groups: COVID-19 patients supported with ECMO (COVID-ECMO, n = 25), non-COVID-19 septic shock patients on ECMO (SEPSIS-ECMO, n = 19) and critically ill COVID-19 patients managed without ECMO (COVID-CONV, n = 74). Methods: This retrospective study (January 2018–January 2025) extracted demographic, laboratory and clinical data at baseline, 48 h and 72 h. The primary end-point was the 72 h change in SOFA score (ΔSOFA). The secondary end-points included the evolution of interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer and ferritin; haemodynamic variables; and 28 day mortality. A post hoc inverse-probability-of-treatment weighting (IPTW) sensitivity analysis adjusted for between-group severity imbalances. Results: Baseline APACHE II differed significantly (29.5 ± 5.8 COVID-ECMO, 27.4 ± 6.1 SEPSIS-ECMO, 18.2 ± 4.9 COVID-CONV; p < 0.001). At 48 h, IL-6 fell by 51.8% in COVID-ECMO (−1 116 ± 473 pg mL⁻¹) versus 32.4% in SEPSIS-ECMO and 18.7% in COVID-CONV (p < 0.001). The ΔSOFA values at 72 h were −4.6 ± 2.2, −3.1 ± 2.5 and −1.4 ± 1.9, respectively (p < 0.001). ECMO groups achieved larger mean arterial pressure rises (+16.8 and +14.2 mmHg) and greater norepinephrine reduction than COVID-CONV. The twenty-eight-day mortality was 36.0% (COVID-ECMO), 42.1% (SEPSIS-ECMO) and 39.2% (COVID-CONV) (p = 0.88). Across all patients, IL-6 clearance correlated with ΔSOFA (ρ = 0.48, p < 0.001) and with vasopressor-free days (ρ = 0.37, p = 0.002). Conclusions: ECMO, regardless of aetiology, accelerates inflammatory-marker decline and organ failure recovery compared with conventional COVID-19 management, but survival advantage remains elusive. COVID-19 appears to display a steeper cytokine-response curve to ECMO than bacterial sepsis, suggesting phenotype-specific benefits that merit confirmation in prospective trials. Full article

Introduction: Sleep disturbances are a common and often underestimated complication during intensive care unit (ICU) stays. These disturbances can significantly impact patients’ recovery and overall well-being. This study aimed to assess the sleep quality of ICU patients and investigate the environmental and clinical factors that affect sleep quality during their ICU stay. Methods: We conducted a six-month cross-sectional study involving patients who had stayed in the ICU for at least three nights and were oriented to time and place upon discharge. Sleep quality was assessed using the Arabic version of the Freedman Sleep Questionnaire. Both environmental factors (e.g., noise, light, and nursing interventions) and clinical variables (illness severity and pain) were examined. The differences across three time periods were analyzed using the Wilcoxon test and Spearman’s correlation. Multiple regression analysis identified the factors influencing sleep quality. Statistical analyses were performed using JAMOVI software (version 2.3.28). Results: The study enrolled 328 patients, with an average age of 49.74 ± 17.89 years. Of the participants, 75.3% were adults. The primary reasons for admission were circulatory distress (45.73%) and metabolic disorders (24.09%). Sleep quality was significantly lower in the ICU compared to patients’ sleep at home (Z = −14.870, p < 0.001). The EVA and APACHE II scores had a statistically significant effect on sleep quality (p < 0.001 and p = 0.015, respectively). In contrast, the Charlson and Quick SOFA scores did not show significant effects (p = 0.128 and p = 0.894). Environmental factors, including noise (p = 0.008), light (p = 0.009), and nursing interventions (p = 0.009), significantly impacted sleep quality. Conclusions: Patients in the ICU generally reported poor sleep quality. Our findings suggest that improving pain management, minimizing environmental noise, and reducing staff-related disturbances could significantly enhance sleep quality for patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Full article