Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Search Results (261)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = non-innovating firms

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 307 KiB  
Article
Who Is Manipulating Corporate Wallets Amid the Ever-Changing Circumstances? Digital Clues, Information Truths and Risk Mysteries
by Cheng Tao, Roslan Ja’afar and Wan Mohd Hirwani Wan Hussain
J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res. 2025, 20(3), 206; https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20030206 (registering DOI) - 7 Aug 2025
Abstract
Digital transformation (DT) has emerged as a key strategic lever for enhancing firm resilience and competitiveness, yet its influence on non-productive investment behaviors, such as corporate financial investment, remains underexplored. Existing studies have largely focused on DT’s role in innovation and operational efficiency, [...] Read more.
Digital transformation (DT) has emerged as a key strategic lever for enhancing firm resilience and competitiveness, yet its influence on non-productive investment behaviors, such as corporate financial investment, remains underexplored. Existing studies have largely focused on DT’s role in innovation and operational efficiency, leaving a significant gap in understanding how DT reshapes firms’ financial asset allocation. Drawing on a unique panel dataset of A-share main board-listed firms in China from 2011 to 2023, this study provides novel empirical evidence that DT significantly restrains financial investment, with pronounced heterogeneity across ownership types. More importantly, this paper uncovers a multi-layered mechanism: DT enhances the corporate information environment, which subsequently reduces financial investment. In addition, the analysis reveals a moderated mediation mechanism wherein economic uncertainty dampens the information-enhancing effect of DT. Unlike previous research that treats corporate risk-taking as a parallel mediator, this study identifies a sequential mediation pathway, where improved information environments suppress financial investment indirectly by influencing firms’ risk-taking behavior. These findings offer new theoretical insights into the financial implications of DT and contribute to the broader understanding of enterprise behavior in the context of digitalization and economic volatility. Full article
29 pages, 1413 KiB  
Article
The Impact of VAT Credit Refunds on Enterprises’ Sustainable Development Capability: A Socio-Technical Systems Theory Perspective
by Jinghuai She, Meng Sun and Haoyu Yan
Systems 2025, 13(8), 669; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13080669 (registering DOI) - 7 Aug 2025
Abstract
We investigate whether China’s Value-Added Tax (VAT) Credit Refund policy influences firms’ sustainable development capability (SDC), which reflects innovation-driven growth and green development. Exploiting the 2018 implementation of the VAT Credit Refund policy as a quasi-natural experiment, we employ a difference-in-differences (DID) approach [...] Read more.
We investigate whether China’s Value-Added Tax (VAT) Credit Refund policy influences firms’ sustainable development capability (SDC), which reflects innovation-driven growth and green development. Exploiting the 2018 implementation of the VAT Credit Refund policy as a quasi-natural experiment, we employ a difference-in-differences (DID) approach and find causal evidence that the policy significantly enhances firms’ SDC. This suggests that fiscal instruments like VAT refunds are valued by firms as drivers of long-term sustainable and high-quality development. Our mediating analyses further reveal that the policy promotes firms’ SDC by strengthening artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities and facilitating intelligent transformation. This mechanism “AI Capability Building—Intelligent Transformation” aligns with the socio-technical systems theory (STST), highlighting the interactive evolution of technological and social subsystems in shaping firm capabilities. The heterogeneity analyses indicate that the positive effect of VAT Credit Refund policy on SDC is more pronounced among small-scale and non-high-tech firms, firms with lower perceived economic policy uncertainty, higher operational diversification, lower reputational capital, and those located in regions with a higher level of marketization. We also find that the policy has persistent long-term effects, with improved SDC associated with enhanced ESG performance and green innovation outcomes. Our findings have important implications for understanding the SDC through the lens of STST and offer policy insights for deepening VAT reform and promoting intelligent and green transformation in China’s enterprises. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Systems Practice in Social Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 4506 KiB  
Article
Interpretable Machine Learning Framework for Corporate Financialization Prediction: A SHAP-Based Analysis of High-Dimensional Data
by Yanhe Wang, Wei Wei, Zhuodong Liu, Jiahe Liu, Yinzhen Lv and Xiangyu Li
Mathematics 2025, 13(15), 2526; https://doi.org/10.3390/math13152526 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
High-dimensional prediction problems with complex non-linear feature interactions present significant algorithmic challenges in machine learning, particularly when dealing with imbalanced datasets and multicollinearity issues. This study proposes an innovative Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)-enhanced machine learning framework that integrates SHAP with advanced ensemble methods [...] Read more.
High-dimensional prediction problems with complex non-linear feature interactions present significant algorithmic challenges in machine learning, particularly when dealing with imbalanced datasets and multicollinearity issues. This study proposes an innovative Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP)-enhanced machine learning framework that integrates SHAP with advanced ensemble methods for interpretable financialization prediction. The methodology simultaneously addresses high-dimensional feature selection using 40 independent variables (19 CSR-related and 21 financialization-related), multicollinearity issues, and model interpretability requirements. Using a comprehensive dataset of 25,642 observations from 3776 Chinese A-share companies (2011–2022), we implement nine optimized machine learning algorithms with hyperparameter tuning via the Hippopotamus Optimization algorithm and five-fold cross-validation. XGBoost demonstrates superior performance with 99.34% explained variance, achieving an RMSE of 0.082 and R2 of 0.299. SHAP analysis reveals non-linear U-shaped relationships between key predictors and financialization outcomes, with critical thresholds at approximately 10 for CSR_SocR, 1.5 for CSR_S, and 5 for CSR_CV. SOE status, EPU, ownership concentration, firm size, and housing prices emerge as the most influential predictors. Notable shifts in factor importance occur during the COVID-19 pandemic period (2020–2022). This work contributes a scalable, interpretable machine learning architecture for high-dimensional financial prediction problems, with applications in risk assessment, portfolio optimization, and regulatory monitoring systems. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

29 pages, 1867 KiB  
Article
Exploring the Triple Dividend Effect and Threshold Effect of Environmental Protection Tax: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies
by Chenghao Ye, Hongjie Gao and Igor A. Mayburov
Sustainability 2025, 17(15), 7038; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17157038 - 3 Aug 2025
Viewed by 298
Abstract
This study uses financial data from 872 Chinese listed companies (2018–2022). It tests the triple dividend effect and threshold effect of China’s environmental protection tax (EPT) using high-dimensional fixed effects models and panel threshold models. We document that (1) EPT creates an environmental [...] Read more.
This study uses financial data from 872 Chinese listed companies (2018–2022). It tests the triple dividend effect and threshold effect of China’s environmental protection tax (EPT) using high-dimensional fixed effects models and panel threshold models. We document that (1) EPT creates an environmental dividend for Chinese listed companies. It significantly reduces pollution emissions. A 1-unit tax increase reduces LnTPPE by 2.5%. (2) EPT creates a significant innovation dividend. It forces enterprises to improve the quality of authorized patents. A 1-unit tax increase raises patent technological complexity by 0.79%. (3) EPT creates an economic dividend. It significantly improves firm performance. A 1-unit tax increase raises relative corporate revenue by 38.1%. (4) EPT exerts significant threshold effects on micro-level triple dividend outcomes among Chinese listed companies. A heterogeneity analysis shows significant differences in threshold effects between non-heavily polluting and heavily polluting industries. This study confirms that China’s EPT generates a micro-level triple dividend effect alongside coexisting threshold effects for listed companies. This provides literature references for China to design and implement differentiated policies and offers a quantitative empirical case for implementing globally sustainable EPT strategies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Air, Climate Change and Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 771 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Preferential Policy on Corporate Green Innovation: A Resource Dependence Perspective
by Chenshuo Li, Shihan Feng, Qingyu Yuan, Jiahui Wei, Shiqi Wang and Dongdong Huang
Sustainability 2025, 17(15), 6834; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156834 - 28 Jul 2025
Viewed by 532
Abstract
Government support has long been viewed as a key driver of sustainable transformation and green technological progress. However, the underlying mechanisms (“how”) through which preferential policies influence green innovation, as well as the contextual conditions (“when”) that shape their [...] Read more.
Government support has long been viewed as a key driver of sustainable transformation and green technological progress. However, the underlying mechanisms (“how”) through which preferential policies influence green innovation, as well as the contextual conditions (“when”) that shape their effectiveness, remain insufficiently understood. Drawing on resource dependence theory, this study develops a dual-mediation framework to investigate how preferential tax policies promote both the quantity and quality of green innovation—by enhancing R&D investment as an internal mechanism and alleviating financing constraints as an external mechanism. These effects are especially salient among non-state-owned enterprises, firms in resource-constrained industries, and those situated in environmentally challenged regions—contexts that entail higher dependence on external support for sustainable development. Leveraging China’s 2017 R&D tax reduction policy as a quasi-natural experiment, this study uses a sample of high-tech small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to test the hypotheses. The findings provide robust evidence on how preferential policies contribute to corporate sustainability through green innovation and identify the conditions under which policy tools are most effective. This research offers important implications for designing targeted, sustainability-oriented innovation policies that support SMEs in transitioning toward more sustainable practices. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 2016 KiB  
Article
Is Digital Industry Agglomeration a New Engine for Firms’ Green Innovation? A New Micro-Evidence from China
by Yaru Yang, Yingming Zhu, Luxiu Zhang and Jiazhen Du
Systems 2025, 13(8), 627; https://doi.org/10.3390/systems13080627 - 24 Jul 2025
Viewed by 258
Abstract
The rapid development of the digital economy and the pursuit of green transformation are reshaping the innovation landscape of Chinese firms. However, limited attention has been paid to how digital industry agglomeration (DIA) influences corporate green innovation (CGI) at the firm level. Drawing [...] Read more.
The rapid development of the digital economy and the pursuit of green transformation are reshaping the innovation landscape of Chinese firms. However, limited attention has been paid to how digital industry agglomeration (DIA) influences corporate green innovation (CGI) at the firm level. Drawing on panel data from China’s A-share listed firms between 2017 and 2021, this study examines the differential effects of specialized agglomeration and diversified agglomeration of digital industry on CGI. The results indicate that DIA can promote CGI, with a 1% increase in DIA associated with a 1.503% increase in green innovation output. Further analysis reveals that specialized agglomeration exerts a significant positive effect, while diversified agglomeration has no evident impact. Our mechanism analysis indicates that knowledge spillovers serve as the key channel through which DIA fosters CGI. Moreover, heterogeneous effects analysis indicates that DIA exerts a stronger influence on non-high-tech enterprises and in regions where environmental regulation is less stringent. Drawing on these insights, fostering specialized digital clusters and strengthening knowledge-sharing mechanisms can help alleviate existing constraints on innovation diffusion, accelerating green innovation and supporting long-term sustainability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Systems Practice in Social Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 485 KiB  
Article
The Green Finance Reform Pilot Zone Policy and Corporate Sustainable Development Performance: A Quasi-Natural Experiment from China
by Shunping Teng and Haslindar Ibrahim
Sustainability 2025, 17(15), 6674; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156674 - 22 Jul 2025
Viewed by 259
Abstract
This study investigates the effect of the Green Finance Reform Pilot Zone Policy (GFRPZP) on corporate sustainable development performance (SDP) using a multi-period difference-in-differences (DIDs) regression model. This model incorporates control variables, reflecting firm-level characteristics and regional economic conditions. The results show that [...] Read more.
This study investigates the effect of the Green Finance Reform Pilot Zone Policy (GFRPZP) on corporate sustainable development performance (SDP) using a multi-period difference-in-differences (DIDs) regression model. This model incorporates control variables, reflecting firm-level characteristics and regional economic conditions. The results show that GFRPZP significantly enhances corporate SDP, with stronger effects observed among non-state-owned enterprises (Non-SOEs), companies situated in eastern regions, those in non-heavily polluting industries, and high-tech companies. Mediation analysis indicates that the policy enhances sustainable development through four main channels: improving the quality and quantity of green innovation, easing financing constraints, and increasing analyst attention. Moderation analysis further demonstrates that digital transformation and internal control strengthen the policy’s effect. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

32 pages, 1432 KiB  
Article
From Carbon to Capability: How Corporate Green and Low-Carbon Transitions Foster New Quality Productive Forces in China
by Lili Teng, Yukun Luo and Shuwen Wei
Sustainability 2025, 17(15), 6657; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17156657 - 22 Jul 2025
Viewed by 423
Abstract
China’s national strategies emphasize both achieving carbon peaking and neutrality (“dual carbon” objectives) and fostering high-quality economic development. This dual focus highlights the critical importance of the Green and Low-Carbon Transition (GLCT) of the economy and the development of New Quality Productive Forces [...] Read more.
China’s national strategies emphasize both achieving carbon peaking and neutrality (“dual carbon” objectives) and fostering high-quality economic development. This dual focus highlights the critical importance of the Green and Low-Carbon Transition (GLCT) of the economy and the development of New Quality Productive Forces (NQPF). Firms are central actors in this transformation, prompting the core research question: How does corporate engagement in GLCT contribute to the formation of NQPF? We investigate this relationship using panel data comprising 33,768 firm-year observations for A-share listed companies across diverse industries in China from 2012 to 2022. Corporate GLCT is measured via textual analysis of annual reports, while an NQPF index, incorporating both tangible and intangible dimensions, is constructed using the entropy method. Our empirical analysis relies primarily on fixed-effects regressions, supplemented by various robustness checks and alternative econometric specifications. The results demonstrate a significantly positive relationship: corporate GLCT robustly promotes the development of NQPF, with dynamic lag structures suggesting delayed productivity realization. Mechanism analysis reveals that this effect operates through three primary channels: improved access to financing, stimulated collaborative innovation and enhanced resource-allocation efficiency. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that the positive impact of GLCT on NQPF is more pronounced for state-owned enterprises (SOEs), firms operating in high-emission sectors, those in energy-efficient or environmentally friendly industries, technology-intensive sectors, non-heavily polluting industries and companies situated in China’s eastern regions. Overall, our findings suggest that corporate GLCT enhances NQPF by improving resource-utilization efficiency and fostering innovation, with these effects amplified by specific regional advantages and firm characteristics. This study offers implications for corporate strategy, highlighting how aligning GLCT initiatives with core business objectives can drive NQPF, and provides evidence relevant for policymakers aiming to optimize environmental governance and foster sustainable economic pathways. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 851 KiB  
Article
How Does Digital Trade Affect a Firm’s Green Total Factor Productivity? A Life Cycle Perspective
by Jianbo Hu, Wenxin Cai, Yu Shen and Faustino Dinis
Sustainability 2025, 17(14), 6435; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146435 - 14 Jul 2025
Viewed by 519
Abstract
It is increasingly recognized that the twin transitions of digitalization and green transformation are pivotal to achieving sustainable development. This study examines how digital trade affects corporate green total factor productivity (GTFP), using panel data from Chinese A-share listed firms and 287 prefecture-level [...] Read more.
It is increasingly recognized that the twin transitions of digitalization and green transformation are pivotal to achieving sustainable development. This study examines how digital trade affects corporate green total factor productivity (GTFP), using panel data from Chinese A-share listed firms and 287 prefecture-level cities in Mainland China from 2012 to 2022. The results demonstrate that digital trade exerts a significant positive impact on GTFP, primarily through improvements in technical efficiency, with heterogeneous effects across different stages of the corporate life cycle. Endogeneity concerns are carefully addressed through instrumental variable estimation and quasi-experimental designs, and robustness checks confirm the reliability of the findings. Mechanism analyses further reveal that digital trade enhances GTFP by stimulating green technological innovation and optimizing supply chain management. Importantly, threshold regression reveals non-linear effects. Both the level of digital trade and institutional factors, such as environmental regulation, intellectual property protection, and market integration, moderate the relationship between digital trade and GTFP in U-shaped, N-shaped, and other positive non-linear patterns. These insights enhance the understanding of how digitalization interacts with institutional contexts to drive sustainable productivity growth, providing practical implications for policymakers seeking to optimize digital trade strategies and complementary regulatory frameworks. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

27 pages, 344 KiB  
Article
Unveiling the Dual Mechanisms of Public Environmental Concern on Green Innovation Quality: The Interplay Between External Pressure and Internal Motivation
by Guomin Song and Fengyan Wang
Sustainability 2025, 17(14), 6398; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146398 - 12 Jul 2025
Viewed by 413
Abstract
Numerous studies have examined how environmental restrictions affect innovation behavior; however, there has not been enough research focused on how public environmental concerns affect green innovation. This paper utilizes panel data of 4607 Chinese A-share listed companies (29,877 firm-year observations) over the period [...] Read more.
Numerous studies have examined how environmental restrictions affect innovation behavior; however, there has not been enough research focused on how public environmental concerns affect green innovation. This paper utilizes panel data of 4607 Chinese A-share listed companies (29,877 firm-year observations) over the period of 2011–2022 and constructs a dual fixed-effects model to investigate the impact of public environmental concern (PEC) on green innovation quality. Furthermore, we explore the mechanisms underlying this influence through the lenses of external pressure and internal motivation, and the moderating effect of digital transformation. The findings reveal the following: (1) Public concern about environmental issues is positively correlated with the green innovation quality. For every 1% increase in PEC, the companies’ green innovation quality will increase by 0.013%. (2) PEC forces firms to improve the green innovation quality through pressure from institutional investors, while pushing firms to boost the green innovation quality by stimulating ESG performance. (3) Digital transformation reinforces the impact of PEC on the green innovation quality. (4) PEC is more sensitive to the impact of green innovation quality in high-tech and non-heavy-polluting companies, and the enhancement effect is more pronounced in the eastern and western districts. Besides expanding the insights into the factors influencing the green innovation quality, this study also gives pragmatic guidance for governments and companies to enhance the green innovation quality, address environmental challenges, and achieve sustainable development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pollution Prevention, Mitigation and Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 338 KiB  
Article
Systemic Gaps in Circular Plastics: A Role-Specific Assessment of Quality and Traceability Barriers in Australia
by Benjamin Gazeau, Atiq Zaman, Roberto Minunno and Faiz Shaikh
Sustainability 2025, 17(14), 6323; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17146323 - 10 Jul 2025
Viewed by 326
Abstract
The effective adoption of quality assurance and traceability systems is increasingly recognised as a critical enabler of circular economy (CE) outcomes in the plastics sector. This study examines the factors that influence the implementation of such systems within Australia’s recycled plastics industry, with [...] Read more.
The effective adoption of quality assurance and traceability systems is increasingly recognised as a critical enabler of circular economy (CE) outcomes in the plastics sector. This study examines the factors that influence the implementation of such systems within Australia’s recycled plastics industry, with a focus on how these factors vary by company size, supply chain role, and adoption of CE strategy. Recycled plastics are defined here as post-consumer or post-industrial polymers that have been reprocessed for reintegration into manufacturing applications. A mixed-methods survey was conducted with 65 stakeholders across the Australian plastics value chain, comprising recyclers, compounders, converters, and end-users. Respondents assessed a structured set of regulatory, technical, economic, and systemic factors, identifying whether each currently operates as an enabler or barrier in their organisational context. The analysis employed a comparative framework adapted from a 2022 European study, enabling a cross-regional interpretation of patterns and a comparison between CE-aligned and non-CE firms. The results show that firms with CE strategies report greater alignment with innovation-oriented enablers such as digital traceability, standardisation, and closed-loop models. However, these firms also express heightened sensitivity to systemic weaknesses, particularly in areas such as infrastructure limitations, inconsistent material quality, and data fragmentation. Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) highlighted compliance costs and operational uncertainty as primary barriers, while larger firms frequently cited frustration with regulatory inconsistency and infrastructure underperformance. These findings underscore the need for differentiated policy mechanisms that account for sectoral and organisational disparities in capacity, scale, and readiness for traceability. The study also cautions against the direct transfer of European circular economy models into the Australian context without consideration of local structural, regulatory, and geographic complexities. Full article
25 pages, 365 KiB  
Article
The Impact of ESG Ratings on Corporate Sustainability: Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms
by Qi Gong, Jiahui Gu, Zhaoyang Kong, Siyan Shen, Xiucheng Dong, Yang Li and Chade Li
Sustainability 2025, 17(13), 5942; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135942 - 27 Jun 2025
Viewed by 554
Abstract
As participants in sustainable development, corporations face the important and controversial issue of whether they can promote corporate sustainability through environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices. To address this issue, we examine the relationship between ESG performance and corporate sustainability, measured by green [...] Read more.
As participants in sustainable development, corporations face the important and controversial issue of whether they can promote corporate sustainability through environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices. To address this issue, we examine the relationship between ESG performance and corporate sustainability, measured by green total factor productivity (GTFP). Using a panel dataset of 17,559 firm-year observations from non-financial firms listed on the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges in China between 2011 and 2019, we employ fixed-effects regression models and two-stage least squares (2SLS) with instrumental variables to empirically test the impact of ESG ratings on GTFP, identify the underlying mechanisms, and examine potential heterogeneity across firms. The results show that higher ESG ratings are significantly associated with increased GTFP. Mediation analysis further reveals that this positive relationship operates through reduced financing constraints and enhanced green innovation. Notably, the mediating role of financing constraints is more pronounced for firms with greater reliance on external capital. Heterogeneity analysis indicates that ESG ratings exert stronger effects in eastern regions, pollution-intensive sectors, and state-owned enterprises. These findings provide empirical support for the role of ESG performance as an effective mechanism to advance corporate sustainability through ethics-driven financial access and innovation capability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sustainable Management)
31 pages, 525 KiB  
Article
Environmental Policy Shocks and Manufacturing Resilience: A Multi-Path Mechanism and Regional Heterogeneity Analysis
by Xingyuan Yao, Zheqiu Wang, Kangze Zheng, Qingfan Lin, Weiming Lin and Yufen Zhong
Sustainability 2025, 17(13), 5932; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135932 - 27 Jun 2025
Viewed by 362
Abstract
Environmental regulation has become a central policy tool for reconciling the tensions between ecological sustainability and industrial development. Although most existing studies focus on its impact on green innovation or firm behavioral change, attention to how environmental regulation affects the structural resilience of [...] Read more.
Environmental regulation has become a central policy tool for reconciling the tensions between ecological sustainability and industrial development. Although most existing studies focus on its impact on green innovation or firm behavioral change, attention to how environmental regulation affects the structural resilience of manufacturing systems under external shocks remains limited. This paper constructs a balanced panel dataset covering 287 prefecture-level cities in mainland China from 2006 to 2021 to quantify the impact of environmental regulation intensity on the resilience of manufacturing development. Manufacturing resilience is assessed through a comprehensive indicator system, including the dimensions of adaptive capacity, recovery potential, and industrial continuity. The empirical results show that environmental regulation has a significant inhibitory effect on manufacturing resilience, and this effect is supported in a number of robustness analyses using instrumental variable estimation and lagged structural tests. Mechanism analysis suggests that, despite the overall negative effect, environmental regulations can indirectly enhance resilience performance by promoting industrial autonomy and digital transformation under certain conditions. Heterogeneity analysis further reveals that the negative effect is more pronounced in regions with higher regulatory intensity, in non-self-employed firms, in industries not subject to U.S. sanctions, and in eastern China. These findings suggest that the dynamic needs of the industrial system should be taken into account in the formulation of environmental policies, and that digital capacity building and autonomy upgrading should be the key paths to mitigate regulatory shocks. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Sustainability and Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 866 KiB  
Article
Two-Pronged Approach: Capital Market Openness Promotes Corporate Green Total Factor Productivity
by Ziyang Zhan, Junfeng Li, Dongxing Jia and Kai Wu
Sustainability 2025, 17(13), 5901; https://doi.org/10.3390/su17135901 - 26 Jun 2025
Viewed by 428
Abstract
This study examines the impact of capital market openness on corporate green total factor productivity (GTFP) using a quasi-natural experiment based on the Shanghai-Hong Kong and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect policies. Employing a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) approach, the findings reveal that capital market [...] Read more.
This study examines the impact of capital market openness on corporate green total factor productivity (GTFP) using a quasi-natural experiment based on the Shanghai-Hong Kong and Shenzhen-Hong Kong Stock Connect policies. Employing a multi-period difference-in-differences (DID) approach, the findings reveal that capital market openness significantly enhances corporate GTFP through two primary mechanisms: strengthening firms’ green financial resources and technological innovation (green “hard strength”) and improving corporate environmental governance, green information disclosure, and managerial green expertise (green “soft strength”). Further heterogeneity analysis suggests that firms with greater institutional investor engagement, higher market competition, and non-state ownership exhibit stronger responses. These results provide policy insights into leveraging financial liberalization to drive corporate sustainability and green economic growth. This study highlights the role of financial markets in supporting global carbon neutrality and sustainable development goals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Economic and Business Aspects of Sustainability)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 389 KiB  
Article
From Greenwashing to Sustainability: The Mediating Effect of Green Innovation in the Agribusiness Sector on Financial Performance
by Zhongping Wang and Xiaoying Tian
Agriculture 2025, 15(12), 1316; https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture15121316 - 19 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 536
Abstract
This study analyses the impact of agricultural greenwashing on financial performance via green innovation. To this end, it employs data from Chinese A-share agribusinesses from 2012 to 2022. The study indicates the following results: (1) the practice of greenwashing (ESG disclosure–performance gap, GW) [...] Read more.
This study analyses the impact of agricultural greenwashing on financial performance via green innovation. To this end, it employs data from Chinese A-share agribusinesses from 2012 to 2022. The study indicates the following results: (1) the practice of greenwashing (ESG disclosure–performance gap, GW) has a significant negative impact on ROA, particularly in non-state firms; (2) green innovation (patents, GI) partially mediates this relationship, with a percentage of 9.09%, as GW diverts research and development resources toward image management. Robustness checks are employed to confirm the results obtained using ROE and lagged models. Property rights moderate the effects: non-state firms are more adversely affected by innovation dependency, while state firms are protected by policies. The “double-edged” mechanism elucidates GW’s short-term legitimacy gains in contrast to long-term innovation suppression and financial decline. The report calls for the establishment of standardised ESG metrics (for example, the disclosure of pesticide residue) and targeted green incentives (for example, SME R&D subsidies) to be aligned with UN SDGs 9.4 (green tech) and 12.6 (responsible production). The present study offers insights into the governance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters within the context of agriculture in China. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Agricultural Economics, Policies and Rural Management)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop