Search Results (1,587)

Background/Objectives: Neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and perioperative chemotherapy are both well-established treatment strategies for locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (EAC) and the esophagogastric junction (AEGJ). However, recent knowledge controversially discusses whether neoadjuvant radiotherapy or perioperative chemotherapy represents superior therapeutic options to prolong survival or cause less toxicity. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 76 patients with locally advanced EAC or AEGJ treated at our tertiary cancer center between January 2015 and March 2023. Patients received either perioperative FLOT chemotherapy (n = 36) or neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy following the CROSS protocol (n = 40), followed by surgical resection and standardized follow-up. We compared survival outcomes, toxicity profiles, treatment compliance, and surgical results between the two groups. Results: There were no statistically significant differences between FLOT and CROSS treatments in five-year loco-regional controls (LRC: 61.5% vs. 68.6%; p = 0.81), progression-free survival (PFS: 33.9% vs. 42.8%; p = 0.82), overall survival (OS: 60.2% vs. 63.4%; p = 0.91), or distant controls (DC: 42.1% vs. 56.5%; p = 0.39). High-grade hematologic toxicities did not significantly differ between groups (p > 0.05). Treatment compliance was lower in the FLOT group, with 50% (18/36) not completing all the planned chemotherapy cycles, compared to 17.5% (7/40) in the CROSS group. All the patients in the CROSS group received the full radiotherapy dose. Surgical outcomes and post-surgical tumor status were comparable between the groups. Conclusions: Although perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT has recently become a standard of care for locally advanced EAC and AEGJ, neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy per the CROSS protocol remains a well-tolerated alternative. In appropriately selected patients, both approaches yield comparable oncological outcomes. Full article

Dose-dense chemotherapy shortens the interval between chemotherapy cycles and has shown improved outcomes in high-risk breast cancer patients. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of dose-dense chemotherapy in 80 breast cancer patients treated at our hospital from 2020 to 2024. The regimen included epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel or docetaxel, with pegfilgrastim support. The overall treatment completion rate was 82.5%. Of the 80 patients, 55 underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and the pathological complete response rate was significantly higher in triple-negative breast cancer (59.1%) compared to that in luminal-type cancer (9.1%). Common adverse events included anemia, liver dysfunction, myalgia, and peripheral neuropathy. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 8.8% of patients, with some cases linked to pegfilgrastim body pod use, particularly in individuals with low subcutaneous fat. Notably, two patients developed pneumocystis pneumonia, potentially associated with steroid administration. Despite these toxicities, most were manageable and resolved after treatment. Our findings support the efficacy of dose-dense chemotherapy, particularly in triple-negative breast cancer, while highlighting the importance of individualized supportive care and vigilance regarding hematologic and infectious complications. Full article

Background: Breast cancer is the most prevalent malignancy among women globally. In Romania, it is the most frequent form of cancer affecting women, with approximately 12,000 new cases diagnosed annually, and the second most common cause of cancer-related mortality, second only to lung cancer. Methods: This study looked at 79 breast cancer patients from Oltenia, concentrating on epidemiology, histology, diagnostic features, and treatments. Patients were chosen based on inclusion criteria such as histopathologically verified diagnosis, availability of clinical and treatment data, and follow-up information. The analyzed biological material consisted of tissue samples taken from the breast parenchyma and axillary lymph nodes. Even though not the primary subject of this paper, all patients underwent immunohistochemical (IHC) evaluation both preoperatively and postoperatively. Results: We found invasive ductal carcinoma to be the predominant type, while ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and mixed types were rare. We performed cross-tabulations of metastasis versus nodal status and age versus therapy type; none reached significance (all p > 0.05), suggesting observed differences were likely due to chance. A chi-square test comparing surgical interventions (breast-conserving vs. mastectomy) in patients who did or did not receive chemotherapy showed, χ² = 3.17, p = 0.367, indicating that chemotherapy did not significantly influence surgical choice. Importantly, adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were used at similar rates across age groups, whereas neoadjuvant hormonal (endocrine) therapy was more common in older patients (but without statistical significance). Conclusions: Finally, we discussed the consequences of individualized care and early detection. Romania’s shockingly low screening rate, which contributes to delayed diagnosis, emphasizes the importance of improved population medical examination and tailored treatment options. Also, the country has one of the lowest rates of mammography uptake in Europe and no systematic population screening program. Full article

Background/Objectives: Nonoperative management (NOM) of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who achieve a complete clinical response (cCR) to total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) has been shown to be oncologically safe and is an attractive treatment option for patients. However, identifying responders to TNT that may benefit from nonoperative management is clinically challenging. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing has shown promise in detecting minimal residual disease but has not yet been studied extensively within this clinical context. Methods: This is a single-institution retrospective case series study of LARC patients treated with TNT from 2019 to 2023 who underwent ctDNA testing as an adjunct to standard clinical response assessments. Results: A total of 28 patients had ctDNA testing as part of their response assessments after TNT. In total, 9 patients had positive ctDNA, and 19 patients had negative ctDNA during surveillance. Baseline characteristics of these two groups were not different. In this study, 6/9 (67%) patients who had positive ctDNA required surgery for residual rectal cancer, whereas only 4/19 (21%) patients who had negative ctDNA required surgery (p = 0.035). Conclusions: ctDNA testing has the potential to detect MRD in LARC patients treated with TNT. Full article

High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common and aggressive subtype of ovarian cancer, accounting for approximately 70% of cases. This study investigates genetic mutations and their associations with overall survival (OS), complete cytoreduction (R0), and platinum response in patients undergoing either primary debulking surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (PDS) or neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery (NACT). Genetic analysis was performed on 43 primary HGSOC tumor samples using targeted massive parallel sequencing via next-generation sequencing (NGS). Clinical and molecular data were evaluated collectively and through subgroup comparisons between PDS and NACT cohorts. All analyzed samples harbored genetic alterations. Univariate survival analysis revealed that the total number of mutations (p = 0.0035), as well as mutations in HRAS (p = 0.044), FLT3 (p = 0.023), TP53 (p = 0.03), and ERBB4 (p = 0.007), were significantly associated with poorer OS. Multivariate Cox regression integrating clinical and molecular data confirmed that ERBB4 mutations are independently associated with adverse outcomes. These findings reveal a distinctive mutational landscape between the PDS and NACT groups and suggest that ERBB4 alterations may define a particularly aggressive tumor phenotype. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of HGSOC biology and may support the development of novel therapeutic targets and personalized treatment strategies in the context of precision oncology. Full article

Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains a major clinical challenge due to its high risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis. Although total mesorectal excision (TME) has been established as the gold standard surgical approach, high recurrence rates associated with surgery alone have driven the development of multimodal preoperative strategies, such as radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy. More recently, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT)—which integrates systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy prior to surgery—and non-operative management (NOM) for patients who achieve a clinical complete response (cCR) have further expanded treatment options. These advances aim not only to improve oncologic outcomes but also to enhance quality of life (QOL) by reducing long-term morbidity and preserving organ function. However, several unresolved issues persist, including the optimal sequencing of therapies, precise risk stratification, accurate evaluation of treatment response, and effective surveillance protocols for NOM. The advent of molecular biomarkers, next-generation sequencing, and artificial intelligence (AI) presents new opportunities for individualized treatment and more accurate prognostication. This narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the current status of preoperative treatment for LARC, critically examines emerging strategies and their supporting evidence, and discusses future directions to optimize both oncological and patient-centered outcomes. By integrating clinical, molecular, and technological advances, the management of rectal cancer is moving toward truly personalized medicine. Full article

Background: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common malignancy among women, posing significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges during pregnancy. Case presentation: This case report presents the treatment of a 32-year-old pregnant woman diagnosed with cervical cancer. Following the diagnosis at 7 weeks of gestation, histological and imaging examinations were performed, leading to the initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Due to the tumor progression noticed under therapy, cesarean section was performed at 29 weeks, immediately followed by radical hysterectomy. Conclusions: The management of cervical cancer during pregnancy necessitates a multidisciplinary approach, based on the patient’s condition, tumor stage, and fetal maturity. This case highlights the limitations and complexities of treating cervical cancer during pregnancy and emphasizes the importance of individualized oncological and surgical planning. Full article

Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent malignancy in women worldwide. Despite most cases being diagnosed in the early stages, patients typically require a multimodal treatment approach. This typically involves a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, systemic treatments (including chemotherapy or immunotherapy), targeted therapy, and endocrine therapy, depending on the disease subtype and the risk of recurrence. Moreover, patients with BC and germline mutations in the breast cancer genes 1 or 2 (BRCA1/BRCA2), (gBRCAm), who are typically young women, often require more aggressive therapeutic interventions. These mutations present unique characteristics that necessitate a distinct treatment approach, potentially influencing the side effect profiles of patients with BC. Regardless of the clear benefit observed with these treatments in terms of reduced recurrence and mortality rates, long-term, treatment-related adverse events occur that negatively affect the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of BC survivors. Thus, long-term adverse events need to be factored into the treatment decision algorithm of patients with early BC (eBC). Physical, functional, emotional, and psychosocial adverse events can occur and represent a significant concern and a challenge for clinicians, patients, and their families. This review article provides an overview of the various long-term adverse events that patients with eBC may experience, including their associated risk factors, as well as management and prevention strategies. We also explore the evidence of the long-term impact of treatment on the HRQoL of patients with gBRCAm. By providing a comprehensive overview of current evidence and recommendations regarding patients’ HRQoL, we aim to equip clinicians with scientific and clinical knowledge and provide guidance to optimize care and improve long-term outcomes. Full article

Background/Objectives: Treatment of borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced (LAPC) pancreatic cancer involves neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by complex surgery, posing significant risks of toxicity, complications, and changes in quality of life (QoL). This study aims to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection on overall survival (OS) and QoL. Methods: Consecutive patients with BRPC and LAPC included in a population-based study (NORPACT-2) from January 2018 to December 2020 were reviewed. Results: A total of 54 patients (BRPC; n = 43, LAPC; n = 11) underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by pancreatectomy. The majority (66.7%) received (m)FOLFIRINOX. Forty-six (85.2%) patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. Vascular resection was performed in 32 (59.3%) patients. Fourteen (25.9%) patients experienced major complications. The majority of the resected specimens demonstrated T2 (63%), N+ (79.6%), and R1 (85.2%) status. Median OS was 31 (CI 24.7–37.3) months. In multivariate analysis, only CAP 3 (p = 0.035) predicted worse survival. Forty (74.1%) patients experienced recurrence. Global QoL (p = 0.031), social and role functioning (p = 0.024, p = 0.031), improved three months after surgery. Pain (p = 0.042), dyspnea (p = 0.004), appetite loss (p = 0.028), and diarrhea (p = 0.007) improved post-resection. Conclusions: Patients with BRPC and LAPC undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection have survival comparable to primary resectable pancreatic cancer. Postoperative morbidity was acceptable, and QoL recovered post-surgery. CAP grade was the only independent negative prognostic factor. Full article

Liver transplantation (LT) for hepatic malignancies is becoming increasingly common, largely because it offers superior survival relative to other treatment approaches. LT is well-accepted for primary liver cancers such as hepatocellular carcinoma and perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and is being increasingly accepted for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and metastases of colorectal cancer or neuroendocrine tumors to the liver. Over time, indications for transplant oncology have broadened, as has the acceptable disease burden for transplantation, particularly with the advent of new neoadjuvant therapies. Other current frontiers in the field include expanding the donor pool through living donors, extended criteria donors, machine perfusion and increasing access to LT for people from disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds. Expanding access to LT can offer renewed hope for long-term survival to patients with primary and secondary liver cancer. Full article

Early prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM) following neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is crucial for timely treatment optimization in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). This study developed and validated a computed tomography-based radiomic model for predicting pathologically confirmed LNM status at the time of surgery in ESCC patients after NAT. A total of 469 ESCC patients from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were retrospectively enrolled and randomized into a training cohort (n = 328) and a test cohort (n = 141). Three signatures were constructed: the tumor-habitat-based signature (Habitat_Rad), derived from radiomic features of three tumor subregions identified via K-means clustering; the multiple instance learning-based signature (MIL_Rad), combining features from 2.5D deep learning models; and the clinicoradiological signature (Clinic), developed through multivariate logistic regression. A combined radiomic nomogram integrating these signatures outperformed the individual models, achieving areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.929 (95% CI, 0.901–0.957) and 0.852 (95% CI, 0.778–0.925) in the training and test cohorts, respectively. The decision curve analysis confirmed a high net clinical benefit, highlighting the nomogram’s potential for accurate LNM prediction after NAT and guiding individualized therapy. Full article

Background/Objectives: Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are well-known risk factors for ovarian cancer. They are also associated with response to platinum-based chemotherapy; however, their definitive impact on patient prognosis remains not fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the influence of BRCA mutation status on the age of ovarian cancer onset and on treatment outcomes in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Methods: This single-center retrospective analysis included newly diagnosed FIGO stage III and IV HGSOC patients treated between June 2018 and April 2023. Patients’ age, tumor histology, CA125 levels, BRCA mutation status, type of treatment (neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy), and surgical outcomes were collected and analyzed. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. Results: Pathogenic mutations were identified in 25 patients (15 in BRCA1, 10 in BRCA2). Patients with a BRCA mutation were diagnosed at a significantly younger age (median 58.78 years) compared to non-carriers (66.81 years; p < 0.001), with BRCA1 carriers being diagnosed the youngest (median 46.52 years). The study found no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between BRCA carriers and non-carriers. However, a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) was observed for patients with a BRCA1 mutation (p = 0.036). No significant OS difference was found for BRCA2 carriers. Conclusions: BRCA mutations, particularly in the BRCA1 gene, are associated with an earlier onset ovarian cancer. BRCA1 mutation appears to be a favorable prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with HGSOC. Our findings demonstrate the clinical implications of different BRCA mutations and support the need for further research in larger cohorts to confirm their influence on prognostic effects. Full article

Background: Often, neoadjuvant therapy, which relies on the induction of double-strand breaks (DSBs), is used prior to surgery to shrink tumors by inducing cancer cell apoptosis. However, recent studies have suggested that this treatment may also induce a fluctuating state between senescence and stemness in PA-1 embryonal carcinoma cells, potentially affecting therapeutic outcomes. Thus, the respective epigenetic pathways are up or downregulated over a time period of days. These fluctuations go hand in hand with changes in spatial DNA organization. Methods: By means of Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy in combination with mathematical evaluation tools for pointillist data sets, we investigated the organization of euchromatin and heterochromatin at the nanoscale on the third and fifth day after etoposide treatment. Results: Using fluorescently labeled antibodies against H3K9me3 (heterochromatin tri-methylation sites) and H3K4me3 (euchromatin tri-methylation sites), we found that the induction of DSBs led to the de-condensation of heterochromatin and compaction of euchromatin, with a peak effect on day 3 after the treatment. On day 3, we also observed the co-localization of euchromatin and heterochromatin, which have marks that usually occur in exclusive low-overlapping network-like compartments. The evaluation of the SMLM data using topological tools (persistent homology and persistent imaging) and principal component analysis, as well as the confocal microscopy analysis of H3K9me3- and H3K4me3-stained PA-1 cells, supported the findings that distinct shifts in euchromatin and heterochromatin organization took place in a subpopulation of these cells during the days after the treatment. Furthermore, by means of flow cytometry, it was shown that the rearrangements in chromatin organization coincided with the simultaneous upregulation of the stemness promotors OCT4A and SOX2 and senescence promotors p21Cip1 and p27. Conclusions: Our findings suggest potential applications to improve cancer therapy by inhibiting chromatin remodeling and preventing therapy-induced senescence. Full article

Background/Objectives: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare and biologically distinct subset of urothelial malignancies, comprising approximately 5–10% of urothelial cancers. UTUC presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, with both a higher likelihood of invasive disease at presentation and a less favorable prognosis compared to urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Current treatment strategies for UTUC are largely derived from bladder cancer studies, underscoring the need for UTUC-directed research. This review provides a comprehensive overview of UTUC, encompassing diagnostic approaches, systemic and intraluminal therapies, surgical management, and future directions. Methods: A narrative review was conducted synthesizing evidence from guideline-based recommendations, retrospective and prospective clinical studies, and ongoing trials focused on UTUC. Results: Neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy is increasingly preferred in UTUC due to the risk of postoperative renal impairment that may preclude adjuvant cisplatin use. Surgical management includes kidney-sparing approaches and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), with selection guided by tumor risk and patient comorbidities. While endoscopic management (EM) preserves renal function, it carries a higher recurrence and surveillance burden; RNU remains standard for high-risk cases. Systemic therapy for advanced and metastatic UTUC mirrors that of bladder urothelial carcinoma. Enfortumab vedotin (EV) plus pembrolizumab showed superior efficacy over chemotherapy in the EV-302 trial, with improved response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival across subgroups, including UTUC. For patients ineligible for EV, the CheckMate-901 study supported first-line chemoimmunotherapy with gemcitabine, cisplatin, and nivolumab. Further systemic therapy strategies include maintenance avelumab post-chemotherapy (JAVELIN Bladder 100), targeted therapies such as erdafitinib (THOR trial), and trastuzumab deruxtecan (DESTINY-PanTumor02) in FGFR2/3-altered and HER2-positive disease, respectively. Conclusions: Historically, the therapeutic landscape of UTUC has been extrapolated from bladder cancer; however, ongoing research specific to UTUC is deriving more precise regimens involving the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, antibody–drug conjugates, and biomarker-driven therapies. Full article

Background/Objectives: Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is increasingly utilized in Western countries for the treatment of gastric cancer (GC). While its oncologic benefits are well established, its impact on surgical safety and long-term outcomes remain a matter of debate. This study evaluates the real-world effect of NACT on perioperative and oncologic outcomes in a high-volume Western center. Methods: Data from 254 patients who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for GC between March 2016 and January 2024 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into an upfront surgery group (n = 144, 56.7%) and a NACT group (n = 110, 43.3%). The primary outcome was to compare the two study groups in terms of perioperative outcomes, as well as overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Multivariate analyses were conducted to identify factors associated with perioperative complications and long-term survival. Results: Patients in the NACT group were younger (median age 65 vs. 72 years; p = 0.001) and had fewer comorbidities. NACT was associated with a higher incidence of proximal tumors (54–49.1% vs. 37–25.7%; p = 0.001), diffuse-type tumors (27–45.8% vs. 39–31.7%; p = 0.03), and lymph-node metastases (82–74.1% vs. 84–58%; p = 0.007). No significant differences were observed in median hospital stay (9 (7–16) and 10 (8–22) days for the upfront and NACT groups, respectively; p = 0.26), post-operative mortality (11–7.6% and 5–4.5% for the upfront and NACT groups, respectively; p = 0.32), and major complications (30–20.8% and 23–20.9% for the upfront and NACT groups, respectively; p = 0.99). Among patients receiving NACT, the FLOT regimen was associated with a lower rate of complications (12–16.2% vs. 11–30.5% in the non-FLOT cohort; p = 0.05) and reoperations (4–5.4% vs. 8–22.2% in the non-FLOT group; p = 0.008). Tumor location was identified as an independent predictor of perioperative complications (OR 4.7, 95% C.I.: 1.56–14.18; p = 0.006), while non-FLOT regimens were independently associated with higher reoperation rates (OR 0.22, 95% C.I.: 0.06–0.86; p = 0.003). Five-year OS was comparable between the two groups (44.6% in the NACT group vs. 47.7% in the upfront surgery group; p = 0.96). N+ status (OR 2.5, 95% C.I. 1.42–4.40; p = 0.001) and R+ margins (OR 1.89, 95% C.I. 0.98–3.65; p = 0.006) were negative independent prognostic factors for DFS. Conclusions: Although several selection biases limit the generalizability of our findings, our results suggest that NACT prior to gastrectomy for GC does not increase postoperative morbidity and mortality in appropriately selected patients. However, its use in elderly and polymorbid patients should be carefully considered to determine the safest and most effective therapeutic approach, particularly in selecting the appropriate chemotherapy regimen, to minimize the risk of postoperative complications requiring surgical reintervention. Full article