Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (23)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = immunoreactive trypsinogen

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
10 pages, 1084 KB  
Article
Next-Generation Sequencing for Cystic Fibrosis: Florida Newborn Screening Experience
by Deanna M. Green, Jean Polasky, Mark Weatherly, Heather Stalker, Colleen Blanchard, Cheryl Kushner, Marisa Couluris, Patricia Ryland, Iruvanti Sunitha, Joseph Fong, Sandra Crump, Emily Reeves and Kristin Barnette
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2025, 11(4), 94; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11040094 - 14 Oct 2025
Viewed by 1527
Abstract
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive genetic condition affecting nearly 1 in 4000 newborns. Early diagnosis and treatment have been shown to improve the care of individuals with CF, which is enhanced through newborn screening (NBS). The state of Florida has been [...] Read more.
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive genetic condition affecting nearly 1 in 4000 newborns. Early diagnosis and treatment have been shown to improve the care of individuals with CF, which is enhanced through newborn screening (NBS). The state of Florida has been performing CF NBS since 2007, and in 2022, Florida implemented enhanced next generation sequencing (NGS). The goal of this change was to identify individuals from under-represented racial and ethnic groups, who may have rare or de novo variants. NBS screening for CF involved a first tier with immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) ≥ 50 or the top 4% of daily specimens, whichever is lower, reflexing to a second tier. As of 2022, the second tier has evolved to an expanded sequence with an Agena 74-variant panel. Single variants would then reflex to the third tier utilizing NGS. NGS is able to confirm what is detected in second-tier testing, adding variants not included in the Agena panel, and refining the TG replications for Poly-T variants to determine pathogenicity of 5T results. When there is a variant of varying clinical consequence between the two databases, the most conservative classification is selected. Individuals with variants would then be referred to one of the contracted CF NBS referral centers for confirmatory sweat chloride testing (sweat). With implementation of NGS, referrals nearly tripled in 2022–2024, with 538 referrals in 2019; 485 in 2020; and 805 in 2021; followed by 1223 referrals made in 2022; 1146 in 2023; and 1294 in 2024. In 2022–2024, 71% of referrals to the contracted NBS CF referral centers were for single variant results, and no cases of CF were identified from these referrals. The number of CF cases remained about the same, ranging from 23 to 40 through the years 2019–2024. The number of CRMS/CFSPID cases, however, tripled going from 10 to 12 in 2019–2022 to over 100 in 2024. The reason for this change seems to be related to complex heterozygous genetic variants as opposed to abnormal sweat. Implementation of NGS for CF in Florida led to a significant increase in the identification of CFTR variants which affected all aspects of the NBS CF process, from an increased workload on the NBS laboratory and follow-up staff, to an increase in referrals to the NBS CF referral centers. The majority of referrals were for single-variant results, which meant the infants had a very low likelihood of having CF. It is recommended that when an algorithm involving NGS is utilized, one should verify that there are appropriate processes for sweat, including the manner in which single-variant CF results are handled, avoiding unnecessary healthcare utilization. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1531 KB  
Commentary
Reflections on 50 Years of Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Experience with Critical Perspectives, Assessment of Current Status, and Predictions for Future Improvements
by Philip M. Farrell
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2025, 11(4), 88; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11040088 - 30 Sep 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1798
Abstract
The morbidity/mortality risks of cystic fibrosis (CF) with a delayed diagnosis have made newborn screening (NBS) attractive for the past 50 years. Initial efforts focused on meconium analyses, but these proved unsatisfactory. After dried blood spot specimens became valuable for NBS applied to [...] Read more.
The morbidity/mortality risks of cystic fibrosis (CF) with a delayed diagnosis have made newborn screening (NBS) attractive for the past 50 years. Initial efforts focused on meconium analyses, but these proved unsatisfactory. After dried blood spot specimens became valuable for NBS applied to other genetic disorders and immunoassay methods became routine, the discovery of immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) led to numerous CF NBS programs around the world. Excellent laboratorians led the way, but CF clinicians rightly questioned the benefit–risk relationship and unanswered questions about IRT. These issues were resolved by the combination of a positive randomized clinical trial and the discovery of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene (CFTR) and its principal pathogenic variant, F508del. Recommendations for universal screening and then the proliferation of IRT/DNA screening programs followed. But more knowledge has brought more complexity, including an enigmatic, distracting condition known as cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator-related metabolic syndrome (CRMS) or cystic fibrosis screen positive, inconclusive diagnosis (CFSPID). Recently, with the recognition that CF is not a “white person’s disease,” and that over 1000 CFTR pathogenic variants occur, attention has turned to achieving equity and timeliness for all babies. Continuous quality improvement has characterized the past decade, as greatly expanded CFTR panels in the DNA tier through next-generation sequencing offer promise and raise the prospect of a primary genetic screening test. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2219 KB  
Article
Evaluating Georgia’s Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Algorithm to Inform Improvement Recommendations
by Brittany Truitt, Eileen Barr, Angela Wittenauer, Andrew Jergel, Shasha Bai, Rossana Sanchez Russo, Kathryn E. Oliver, Kathleen McKie and Rachel W. Linnemann
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2025, 11(4), 87; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11040087 - 29 Sep 2025
Viewed by 1564
Abstract
Early diagnosis by newborn screening (NBS) has contributed to improved outcomes in children with cystic fibrosis (CwCF). Georgia’s two-tiered algorithm consists of a fixed immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) cut-off followed by a 39-variant CFTR genetic panel. We conducted a retrospective review of CwCF born [...] Read more.
Early diagnosis by newborn screening (NBS) has contributed to improved outcomes in children with cystic fibrosis (CwCF). Georgia’s two-tiered algorithm consists of a fixed immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) cut-off followed by a 39-variant CFTR genetic panel. We conducted a retrospective review of CwCF born in Georgia from 2007 to 2022 to evaluate false negative NBS frequency. We characterized CwCF whose diagnosis was delayed beyond 28 days of age despite positive NBS. Six cases were detailed demonstrating the impact of missed and delayed diagnoses. We examined IRT trends from 2018 to 2022 and cut-off approaches. Missed case detection by expanded CFTR variant assays was assessed. Of 390 CwCF born in Georgia, 18 (4.6%) had false negative NBS—6 due to lack of CFTR variant detection and 12 due to low IRT values. Thirty children had delayed diagnosis, with the majority related to sweat testing. Minoritized children made up 19% of the population but 43% of missed and 44% of delayed diagnoses. Black and Hispanic infants had higher odds of missed or delayed diagnosis compared to non-Hispanic White infants (OR = 2.7, p = 0.027 and OR = 6.1, p < 0.001, respectively). Average IRT values varied across kits and were lower in warmer seasons. Expanded CFTR assays would reduce missed cases. Our results informed recommendations for improvement at multiple steps in the NBS process. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 571 KB  
Article
Evaluation of Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening and Follow-Up Process in Georgia (2022–2023)
by Nino Vardosanidze, Nani Kavlashvili, Lali Margvelashvili, Oleg Kvlividze, Mikheil Diakonidze, Saba Iordanishvili and Dodo Agladze
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2025, 11(2), 43; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11020043 - 4 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2129
Abstract
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a chronic, autosomal-recessive disorder caused by mutations in the CFTR gene, leading to thickened secretions that affect multiple organ systems. This study examines the effectiveness of Georgia’s national CF screening program, which was initiated in 2012 and includes the [...] Read more.
Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a chronic, autosomal-recessive disorder caused by mutations in the CFTR gene, leading to thickened secretions that affect multiple organ systems. This study examines the effectiveness of Georgia’s national CF screening program, which was initiated in 2012 and includes the measurement of immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) levels at birth. An analysis of data from 2022 and 2023 revealed a decrease in follow-up attendance for sweat chloride testing among newborns with elevated IRT levels, from 59.9% to 51.2%. The birth prevalence of cystic fibrosis in Georgia varied, suggesting a need to improve both the accessibility of free testing and the quality of follow-up care. Identified barriers include limited access to screening results for pediatricians and the cost of follow-up tests. Recommendations include incorporating free sweat chloride and genetic testing into the national program, as well as improving community education and coordination with social agencies. The identification of 29 CFTR mutations in patients underscores the importance of continued genetic counseling. Overall, while the screening program shows promise, addressing these barriers is essential to improve outcomes and ensure the timely diagnosis and management of cystic fibrosis in Georgia. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

3 pages, 139 KB  
Commentary
It Takes All of Us: How the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Is Supporting States in Advancing Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening
by Mary Dwight and Albert Faro
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2025, 11(2), 39; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11020039 - 20 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1057
Abstract
The publication of Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening: A Systematic Review-Driven Consensus Guideline from the United States Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) presents the challenge of implementation. CFF is prepared to partner with stakeholders to enhance newborn screening (NBS) practices. Through funding provided to the [...] Read more.
The publication of Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening: A Systematic Review-Driven Consensus Guideline from the United States Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (CFF) presents the challenge of implementation. CFF is prepared to partner with stakeholders to enhance newborn screening (NBS) practices. Through funding provided to the Center for Public Health Innovation (CPHI), the CFF has helped establish two genetic testing resource centers to help states implement CFTR sequencing within the NBS algorithm. CPHI, with CFF funding, is facilitating quality improvement collaboratives that unite CF clinicians and NBS staff nationwide to share best practices in laboratory methods, communication, and education. CFF continues to fund the Screening Improvement Program Award for Optimizing the Diagnosis of Infants and has developed a toolkit to help CF care teams collaborate with NBS programs on guideline implementation. Together, these initiatives aim to support states and CF providers in adapting their algorithms and processes. By identifying current best practices to improve timeliness, sensitivity, and equity in CF NBS, CFF seeks to promote better outcomes for all individuals with CF. Recognizing the competing demands on state public health departments, CFF is committed to partnering with stakeholders to ensure meaningful improvements in CF NBS. Full article
11 pages, 843 KB  
Commentary
India: The Last and Best Frontier for Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening with Perspectives on Special Challenges
by Philip M. Farrell, Grace R. Paul and Sneha D. Varkki
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2025, 11(2), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11020027 - 17 Apr 2025
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2037
Abstract
Because a delayed diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF) is detrimental and may be fatal, screening at birth has become routine in the Western world and has proven beneficial for many reasons, in addition to enabling prompt specialized care. Newborn screening (NBS) programs have [...] Read more.
Because a delayed diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF) is detrimental and may be fatal, screening at birth has become routine in the Western world and has proven beneficial for many reasons, in addition to enabling prompt specialized care. Newborn screening (NBS) programs have elucidated the true incidence of CF in a variety of populations and enabled rapid genotype identification through the analysis of the cystic fibrosis transmembrane regulator (CFTR) gene. NBS studies also have revealed regional and population differences in CFTR variants and refuted the dogma that CF is a “white person’s disease”. But some regions have not yet implemented CF NBS, particularly in Asia where the disease prevalence has been uncertain. While the needs of a few low-and-middle-income countries are being addressed sequentially, one of the regions of greatest current interest is the Indian subcontinent because of recent data suggesting a higher incidence than that previously assumed, and clinical observations indicating tragic outcomes due to delayed diagnoses or failure to diagnose the disorder in young children. Thus, we conclude that the opportunities for research combined with service in the Indian subcontinent are urgent and potentially very impactful. Consequently, India is the last and best frontier for CF NBS, as we argue herein. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 1424 KB  
Guidelines
Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening: A Systematic Review-Driven Consensus Guideline from the United States Cystic Fibrosis Foundation
by Meghan E. McGarry, Karen S. Raraigh, Philip Farrell, Faith Shropshire, Karey Padding, Cambrey White, M. Christine Dorley, Steven Hicks, Clement L. Ren, Kathryn Tullis, Debra Freedenberg, Q. Eileen Wafford, Sarah E. Hempstead, Marissa A. Taylor, Albert Faro, Marci K. Sontag and Susanna A. McColley
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2025, 11(2), 24; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns11020024 - 2 Apr 2025
Cited by 18 | Viewed by 14614
Abstract
Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) has been universal in the US since 2010; however, there is significant variation among newborn screening algorithms. Systematic reviews were used to develop seven recommendations for newborn screening program practices to improve timeliness, sensitivity, and equity in [...] Read more.
Newborn screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) has been universal in the US since 2010; however, there is significant variation among newborn screening algorithms. Systematic reviews were used to develop seven recommendations for newborn screening program practices to improve timeliness, sensitivity, and equity in diagnosing infants with CF: (1) The CF Foundation recommends the use of a floating immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) cutoff over a fixed IRT cutoff; (2) The CF Foundation recommends using a very high IRT referral strategy in CF newborn screening programs whose variant panel does not include all CF-causing variants in CFTR2 or does not have a variant panel that achieves at least 95% sensitivity in all ancestral groups within the state; (3) The CF Foundation recommends that CF newborn screening algorithms should not limit CFTR variant detection to the F508del variant or variants included in the American College of Medical Genetics-23 panel; (4) The CF Foundation recommends that CF newborn screening programs screen for all CF-causing CFTR variants in CFTR2; (5) The CF Foundation recommends conducting CFTR variant screening twice weekly or more frequently as resources allow; (6) The CF Foundation recommends the inclusion of a CFTR sequencing tier following IRT and CFTR variant panel testing to improve the specificity and positive predictive value of CF newborn screening; (7) The CF Foundation recommends that both the primary care provider and the CF specialist be notified of abnormal newborn screening results. Through implementation, it is anticipated that these recommendations will result in improved sensitivity, equity, and timeliness of CF newborn screening, leading to improved health outcomes for all individuals diagnosed with CF following newborn screening and a decreased burden on families. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1690 KB  
Article
Cystic Fibrosis Screening Efficacy and Seasonal Variation in California: 15-Year Comparison of IRT Cutoffs Versus Daily Percentile for First-Tier Testing
by Stanley Sciortino, Steve Graham, Tracey Bishop, Jamie Matteson, Sarah Carter, Cindy H. Wu and Rajesh Sharma
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2024, 10(4), 76; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns10040076 - 22 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2297
Abstract
The California Genetic Disease Screening Program (GDSP) employs a fixed immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) cutoff followed by molecular testing to screen newborns for cystic fibrosis (CF). The cutoffs approximate a 1.6% yearly IRT screen-positive rate; however, seasonal variation in IRT population means has led [...] Read more.
The California Genetic Disease Screening Program (GDSP) employs a fixed immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) cutoff followed by molecular testing to screen newborns for cystic fibrosis (CF). The cutoffs approximate a 1.6% yearly IRT screen-positive rate; however, seasonal variation in IRT population means has led us to develop a model to establish fixed IRT cutoffs that anticipate seasonal variation and minimize missed cases below cutoff. We utilized an ARIMA model to fit monthly IRT screen-positive percentiles and estimated regular seasonal expectations. We established a retrospective cohort followed for at least 1.5 years to capture missed false-negative CF cases. We compared missed CF cases identified by seasonal cutoffs vs. floating cutoffs. GDSP screened 7,410,003 newborns, from July 2007 to December 2022, and missed 36 CF cases below the fixed cutoff; five of the 36 were within 3 ng/mL below the cutoff. There was a regular, seasonal cycle that varied from 1.4% in summer to 1.8% in winter. We would have missed 59 CF cases using a 1.6% daily floating cutoff. California would need to use a 4% daily floating cutoff to improve our current detection rate, which would double the number of specimens sent for costly molecular analysis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 2095 KB  
Article
Biological Reference Intervals for 17α-Hydroxyprogesterone Immunoreactive Trypsinogen, and Biotinidase in Indian Newborns
by E. Maruthi Prasad, Ramesh Kinha and Rajesh Bendre
BioMed 2024, 4(3), 268-276; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomed4030021 - 24 Aug 2024
Viewed by 3656
Abstract
Neonatal deaths, which usually occur in the first week after delivery, account for nearly 75 percent of all deaths of children under 5 years of age. Prematurity, birth difficulties, infections, and birth defects are responsible for about 40 percent of these deaths. Although [...] Read more.
Neonatal deaths, which usually occur in the first week after delivery, account for nearly 75 percent of all deaths of children under 5 years of age. Prematurity, birth difficulties, infections, and birth defects are responsible for about 40 percent of these deaths. Although mortality rates have declined since 2000, access to quality healthcare remains a major problem for mothers and infants worldwide. In perspective, the present study aimed to establish clear biological reference intervals for 17α-hydroxyprogesterone (17-OHP), immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT), and biotinidase in Indian neonates. The statistical analysis of data from up to 3200 dried blood spot (DBS) samples of Indian newborns provided valuable information for the new cut-off values in newborn screening (NBS) programs. We applied correlation analysis to fix the relationship for NBS parameters such as 17-OHP, IRT, and biotinidase. This study provided important information about the distribution and comparison of key cut-offs for biomarkers considering body weights and gestational age in the Indian newborn population for the first time, which can help healthcare experts make easier treatment decisions. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 1158 KB  
Article
Neonatal Screening for Cystic Fibrosis in Hungary—First-Year Experiences
by Andrea Xue, István Lénárt, Judit Kincs, Hajnalka Szabó, Andrea Párniczky, István Balogh, Anna Deák, Péter Béla Monostori, Krisztina Hegedűs, Attila J. Szabó and Ildikó Szatmári
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2023, 9(3), 47; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns9030047 - 23 Aug 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2912
Abstract
The aim of this study is to evaluate the strategy of the cystic fibrosis newborn screening (CFNBS) programme in Hungary based on the results of the first year of screening. A combined immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) and pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) CFNBS protocol (IRT/IRT×PAP/IRT) was [...] Read more.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the strategy of the cystic fibrosis newborn screening (CFNBS) programme in Hungary based on the results of the first year of screening. A combined immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) and pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) CFNBS protocol (IRT/IRT×PAP/IRT) was applied with an IRT-dependent safety net (SN). Out of 88,400 newborns, 256 were tested screen-positive. Fourteen cystic fibrosis (CF) and two cystic fibrosis-positive inconclusive diagnosis (CFSPID) cases were confirmed from the screen-positive cases, and two false-negative cases were diagnosed later. Based on the obtained results, a sensitivity of 88% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 5.9% were calculated. Following the recognition of false-negative cases, the calculation method of the age-dependent cut-off was changed. In purely biochemical CFNBS protocols, a small protocol change, even after a short period, can have a significant positive impact on the performance. CFNBS should be monitored continuously in order to fine-tune the screening strategy and define the best local practices. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 574 KB  
Review
Diagnostic and Communication Challenges in Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening
by Joan Kathleen DeCelie-Germana, Lynn Bonitz, Elinor Langfelder-Schwind, Catherine Kier, Barry Lawrence Diener and Maria Berdella
Life 2023, 13(8), 1646; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13081646 - 28 Jul 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3800
Abstract
As of December 2009, cystic fibrosis (CF) newborn screening (NBS) is performed in all 50 US states and the District of Columbia. Widespread implementation of CF newborn screening (CFNBS) in the US and internationally has brought about new and varied challenges. Immunoreactive trypsinogen [...] Read more.
As of December 2009, cystic fibrosis (CF) newborn screening (NBS) is performed in all 50 US states and the District of Columbia. Widespread implementation of CF newborn screening (CFNBS) in the US and internationally has brought about new and varied challenges. Immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) remains the first, albeit imperfect, biomarker used universally in the screening process. Advances in genetic testing have provided an opportunity for newborn screening programs to add CFTR sequencing tiers to their algorithms. This in turn will enable earlier identification of babies with CF and improve longer-term outcomes through prompt treatment and intervention. CFTR sequencing has led to the ability to identify infants with CF from diverse ethnic and racial backgrounds more equitably while also identifying an increasing proportion of infants with inconclusive diagnoses. Using the evolution of the New York State CF newborn screening program as a guide, this review outlines the basic steps in a universal CF newborn screening program, considers how to reduce bias, highlights challenges, offers guidance to address these challenges and provides recommendations for future consideration. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cystic Fibrosis: A Disease with a New Face)
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 421 KB  
Article
Immunoreactive Trypsinogen in Infants Born to Women with Cystic Fibrosis Taking Elexacaftor–Tezacaftor–Ivacaftor
by Payal Patel, Jana Yeley, Cynthia Brown, Melissa Wesson, Barbara G. Lesko, James E. Slaven, James F. Chmiel, Raksha Jain and Don B. Sanders
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2023, 9(1), 10; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns9010010 - 21 Feb 2023
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 3881
Abstract
Most people with cystic fibrosis (CF) are diagnosed following abnormal newborn screening (NBS), which begins with measurement of immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) values. A case report found low concentrations of IRT in an infant with CF exposed to the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) [...] Read more.
Most people with cystic fibrosis (CF) are diagnosed following abnormal newborn screening (NBS), which begins with measurement of immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) values. A case report found low concentrations of IRT in an infant with CF exposed to the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator, elexacaftor–tezacaftor–ivacaftor (ETI), in utero. However, IRT values in infants born to mothers taking ETI have not been systematically assessed. We hypothesized that ETI-exposed infants have lower IRT values than newborns with CF, CFTR-related metabolic syndrome/CF screen positive, inconclusive diagnosis (CRMS/CFSPID), or CF carriers. IRT values were collected from infants born in Indiana between 1 January 2020, and 2 June 2022, with ≥1 CFTR mutation. IRT values were compared to infants born to mothers with CF taking ETI followed at our institution. Compared to infants identified with CF (n = 51), CRMS/CFSPID (n = 21), and CF carriers (n = 489), ETI-exposed infants (n = 19) had lower IRT values (p < 0.001). Infants with normal NBS results for CF had similar median (interquartile range) IRT values, 22.5 (16.8, 30.6) ng/mL, as ETI-exposed infants, 18.9 (15.2, 26.5). IRT values from ETI-exposed infants were lower than for infants with abnormal NBS for CF. We recommend that NBS programs consider performing CFTR variant analysis for all ETI-exposed infants. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 1377 KB  
Article
Missed Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening Cases due to Immunoreactive Trypsinogen Levels below Program Cutoffs: A National Survey of Risk Factors
by Martin Kharrazi, Charlene Sacramento, Anne Marie Comeau, Jaime E. Hale, Michele Caggana, Denise M. Kay, Rachel Lee, Brendan Reilly, John D. Thompson, Samya Z. Nasr, Mary Kleyn, Gary Hoffman, Mei W. Baker, Colleen Clarke, Cheryl L. Harris, M. Christine Dorley, Hilary Fryman, Ankit Sutaria, Amy Hietala, Holly Winslow, Holly Richards and Bradford L. Therrelladd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2022, 8(4), 58; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijns8040058 - 27 Oct 2022
Cited by 17 | Viewed by 6032
Abstract
Testing immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) is the first step in cystic fibrosis (CF) newborn screening. While high IRT is associated with CF, some cases are missed. This survey aimed to find factors associated with missed CF cases due to IRT levels below program cutoffs. [...] Read more.
Testing immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) is the first step in cystic fibrosis (CF) newborn screening. While high IRT is associated with CF, some cases are missed. This survey aimed to find factors associated with missed CF cases due to IRT levels below program cutoffs. Twenty-nine states responded to a U.S-wide survey and 13 supplied program-related data for low IRT false screen negative cases (CFFN) and CF true screen positive cases (CFTP) for analysis. Rates of missed CF cases and odds ratios were derived for each factor in CFFNs, and two CFFN subgroups, IRT above (“high”) and below (“low”) the CFFN median (39 ng/mL) compared to CFTPs for this entire sample set. Factors associated with “high” CFFN subgroup were Black race, higher IRT cutoff, fixed IRT cutoff, genotypes without two known CF-causing variants, and meconium ileus. Factors associated with “low” CFFN subgroup were older age at specimen collection, Saturday birth, hotter season of newborn dried blood spot collection, maximum ≥ 3 days laboratories could be closed, preterm birth, and formula feeding newborns. Lowering IRT cutoffs may reduce “high” IRT CFFNs. Addressing hospital and laboratory factors (like training staff in collection of blood spots, using insulated containers during transport and reducing consecutive days screening laboratories are closed) may reduce “low” IRT CFFNs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 247 KB  
Article
Immunoreactive Trypsinogen and Free Carnitine Changes on Newborn Screening after Birth in Patients Who Develop Type 1 Diabetes
by Jane Frances Grace Lustre Estrella, Veronica C. Wiley and David Simmons
Nutrients 2021, 13(10), 3669; https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13103669 - 19 Oct 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3177
Abstract
Are free carnitine concentrations on newborn screening (NBS) 48–72 h after birth lower in patients who develop type 1 diabetes than in controls? A retrospective case-control study of patients with type 1 diabetes was conducted. NBS results of patients from a Sydney hospital [...] Read more.
Are free carnitine concentrations on newborn screening (NBS) 48–72 h after birth lower in patients who develop type 1 diabetes than in controls? A retrospective case-control study of patients with type 1 diabetes was conducted. NBS results of patients from a Sydney hospital were compared against matched controls from the same hospital (1:5). Multiple imputation was performed for estimating missing data (gestational age) using gender and birthweight. Conditional logistic regression was used to control for confounding and to generate parameter estimates (α = 0.05). The Hommel approach was used for post-hoc analyses. Results are reported as medians and interquartile ranges. A total of 159 patients were eligible (80 females). Antibodies were detectable in 86. Median age at diagnosis was 8 years. Free carnitine concentrations were lower in patients than controls (25.50 µmol/L;18.98–33.61 vs. 27.26; 21.22–34.86 respectively) (p = 0.018). Immunoreactive trypsinogen was higher in this group (20.24 µg/L;16.15–29–52 vs. 18.71; 13.96–26.92) (p = 0.045), which did not persist in the post-hoc analysis. Carnitine levels are lower and immunoreactive trypsinogen might be higher, within 2–3 days of birth and years before development of type 1 diabetes as compared to controls, although the differences were well within reference ranges and provide insight into the pathogenesis into neonatal onset of type 1 diabetes development rather than use as a diagnostic tool. Given trypsinogen’s use for evaluation of new-onset type 1 diabetes, larger studies are warranted. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Nutrition and Diabetes)
10 pages, 945 KB  
Article
Cystic Fibrosis Newborn Screening in Austria Using PAP and the Numeric Product of PAP and IRT Concentrations as Second-Tier Parameters
by Maximilian Zeyda, Andrea Schanzer, Pavel Basek, Vera Bauer, Ernst Eber, Helmut Ellemunter, Margit Kallinger, Josef Riedler, Christina Thir, Franz Wadlegger, Angela Zacharasiewicz and Sabine Renner
Diagnostics 2021, 11(2), 299; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11020299 - 13 Feb 2021
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3450
Abstract
In Austria, newborns have been screened for cystic fibrosis (CF) by analyzing immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) from dried blood spots (DBS)s for nearly 20 years. Recently, pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) analysis was introduced as a second-tier test with the aim of reducing recalls for second [...] Read more.
In Austria, newborns have been screened for cystic fibrosis (CF) by analyzing immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT) from dried blood spots (DBS)s for nearly 20 years. Recently, pancreatitis-associated protein (PAP) analysis was introduced as a second-tier test with the aim of reducing recalls for second DBS cards while keeping sensitivity high. For 28 months, when IRT was elevated (65–130 ng/mL), PAP was measured from the first DBS (n = 198,927) with a two-step cut-off applied. For the last 12 months of the observation period (n = 85,421), an additional IRT×PAP cut-off was introduced. If PAP or IRT×PAP were above cut-off, a second card was analyzed for IRT and in case of elevated values identified as screen-positive. Above 130 ng/mL IRT in the first DBS, newborns were classified as screen-positive. IRT analysis of first DBS resulted in 1961 (1%) tests for PAP. In the first 16 months, 26 of 93 screen-positive were confirmed to have CF. Two false-negatives have been reported (sensitivity = 92.8%). Importantly, less than 30% of families compared to the previous IRT-IRT screening scheme had to be contacted causing distress. Adding IRT×PAP caused a marginally increased number of second cards and sweat tests to be requested during this period (15 and 3, respectively) compared to the initial IRT-PAP scheme. One case of confirmed CF was found due to IRT×PAP, demonstrating an increase in sensitivity. Thus, the relatively simple and economical algorithm presented here performs effectively and may be a useful model for inclusion of CF into NBS panels or modification of existing schemes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Pathology and Molecular Diagnostics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop