Search Results (69)

Current approaches to gaming disorder prevention remain comparatively narrow, and prevention efforts are frequently underdeveloped and fragmented. Using the socio-ecological model (SEM), this qualitative study mapped frontline practitioners’ perceived obstacles and opportunities to develop a multi-level, practice-grounded framework for policy and implementation. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 prevention professionals in Flanders (Dutch-speaking Belgium), recruited via purposive and snowball sampling. A hybrid inductive–deductive analysis—iterative coding guided by Layder’s adaptive theory—organized findings across SEM levels. At the public policy level, participants highlighted insufficient sustainable funding but saw potential in coordinated frameworks moving prevention beyond substance-focused agendas. At the community level, a clear knowledge gap emerged, with opportunities in integrating gaming within broader digital well-being efforts. Institutionally, the absence of practical tools and clear referral pathways was noted, in addition to high participation barriers, whereas accessible programs with targeted outreach were viewed as promising. Interpersonally, parental disengagement was common, but early involvement and pedagogical guidance were seen as key levers. At the intrapersonal level, limited self-insight and emotion regulation impeded change, while resilience, self-confidence, and offline activities were protective. This first empirical application of the SEM to gaming disorder prevention highlights the need for a multi-level, context-sensitive framework that bridges public health and digital media perspectives. Full article

This paper investigates a service-oriented hybrid supply chain involving a manufacturer, a service provider, and an integrator, where product demand is jointly influenced by service level and retail price. To address the increasing dominance of service providers in value creation, we construct two Stackelberg game models under different power structures: manufacturer-dominant and service-provider dominant. The models characterize the equilibrium pricing and service decisions across supply chain members considering service sensitivity. Analytical results indicate that the service-provider dominant structure outperforms in high-sensitivity markets, resulting in higher service levels, demand, and overall supply chain profits. Numerical experiments further validate the theoretical findings and offer managerial insights into the design of power structures in service-integrated supply chains. The results offer guidance for optimizing pricing and service strategies in complex, service-sensitive environments. Full article

Moving Target Defense (MTD) has been proposed as a dynamic defense strategy to address the static and isomorphic vulnerabilities of networks. Recent research in MTD has focused on enhancing its effectiveness by combining it with cyber deception techniques. However, there is limited research on evaluating and quantifying this hybrid defence framework. Existing studies on MTD evaluation often overlook the deployment of deception, which can expand the potential attack surface and introduce additional costs. Moreover, a unified model that simultaneously measures security, reliability, and defense cost is lacking. We propose a novel hybrid defense effectiveness evaluation method that integrates queuing and evolutionary game theories to tackle these challenges. The proposed method quantifies the safety, reliability, and defense cost. Additionally, we construct an evolutionary game model of MTD and deception, jointly optimizing triggering and deployment strategies to minimize the attack success rate. Furthermore, we introduce a hybrid strategy selection algorithm to evaluate the impact of various strategy combinations on security, resource consumption, and availability. Simulation and experimental results demonstrate that the proposed approach can accurately evaluate and guide the configuration of hybrid defenses. Demonstrating that hybrid defense can effectively reduce the attack success rate and unnecessary overhead while maintaining Quality of Service (QoS). Full article

Assessing the accessibility of urban metro stations is essential for optimizing metro system planning and improving travel efficiency for residents. This study proposes an innovative evaluation framework—the CWM-GRA-TOPSIS model—for comprehensive metro station accessibility assessment. First, a multi-dimensional indicator system is established, encompassing three key dimensions, to-metro accessibility, by-metro accessibility, and land use accessibility, which are further refined into 14 secondary indicators for detailed analysis. A Combination Weighting Method (CWM) is then introduced, integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for subjective weighting and the Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) method for objective weighting, with their integration optimized through Game Theory. Subsequently, the overall accessibility of metro stations is evaluated and ranked using a hybrid Grey Relational Analysis (GRA) and Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) approach. The proposed method is applied to Wuhan, China, to demonstrate its effectiveness and applicability. Results show that the CWM-GRA-TOPSIS model, by balancing objectivity and practical relevance, provides a more reliable and systematic approach for identifying accessibility disparities and formulating targeted improvement strategies for urban metro systems. Full article

The global energy transition, characterized by the proliferation of intermittent renewables and the evolution of electricity markets, has positioned virtual power plants (VPPs) as crucial aggregators of distributed energy resources. However, their participation in competitive markets is fraught with multifaceted uncertainties stemming from price volatility, renewable generation intermittency, and unpredictable prosumer behavior, which necessitate sophisticated, risk-averse bidding strategies to ensure financial viability. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the state-of-the-art in risk-averse bidding for VPPs. It first establishes a resource-centric taxonomy, categorizing VPPs into four primary archetypes: DER-driven, demand response-oriented, electric vehicle-integrated, and multi-energy systems. The paper then delivers a comparative assessment of different optimization techniques—from stochastic programming with conditional value-at-risk and robust optimization to emerging paradigms such as distributionally robust optimization, game theory, and artificial intelligence. It critically evaluates their application contexts and effectiveness in mitigating specific risks across diverse market types. Finally, the review synthesizes these insights to identify persistent challenges—including computational bottlenecks, data privacy, and a lack of standardization—and outlines a forward-looking research agenda. This agenda emphasizes the development of hybrid AI–physical models, interoperability standards, multi-domain risk modeling, and collaborative VPP ecosystems to advance the field towards a resilient and decarbonized energy future. Full article

With the widespread application of artificial intelligence in real estate price prediction, model explainability has become a critical factor influencing its acceptability and trustworthiness. The Shapley value, as a classic cooperative game theory method, quantifies the average marginal contribution of each feature, ensuring global fairness in the explanation allocation. However, its focus on average fairness lacks robustness under data perturbations, model changes, and adversarial attacks. To address this limitation, this paper proposes a hybrid explainability framework that integrates the Shapley value and Least Core attribution. The framework leverages the Least Core theory by formulating a linear programming problem to minimize the maximum dissatisfaction of feature subsets, providing bottom-line fairness. Furthermore, the attributions from the Shapley value and Least Core are combined through a weighted fusion approach, where the weight acts as a tunable hyperparameter to balance the global fairness and worst-case robustness. The proposed framework is seamlessly integrated into mainstream machine learning models such as XGBoost. Empirical evaluations on real-world real estate rental data demonstrate that this hybrid attribution method not only preserves the global fairness of the Shapley value but also significantly enhances the explanation consistency and trustworthiness under various data perturbations. This study provides a new perspective for robust explainable AI in high-risk decision-making scenarios and holds promising potential for practical applications. Full article

Designing fair and sustainable pricing mechanisms for health insurance requires accurate risk assessment and the formulation of incentive-compatible strategies among stakeholders. This study proposes a hybrid framework that integrates machine learning with game theory to determine optimal, risk-based premium rates. Using a comprehensive dataset of insured individuals, the XGBoost algorithm is employed to predict medical claim costs and calculate corresponding premiums. To enhance transparency and explainability, SHAP analysis is conducted across four risk-based groups, revealing key drivers, including healthcare utilization and demographic features. The strategic interactions among the insurer, insured, and employer are modeled as a repeated game. Using the Folk Theorem, the conditions under which long-term cooperation becomes a sustainable Nash equilibrium are explored. The results demonstrate that XGBoost achieves high predictive accuracy (R² ≈ 0.787) along with strong performance in error measures (RMSE ≈ 1.64 × 10⁷ IRR, MAE ≈ 1.08 × 10⁶ IRR), while SHAP analysis offers interpretable insights into the most influential predictors. Game-theoretic analysis further reveals that under appropriate discount rates, stable cooperation between stakeholders is achievable. These findings support the development of equitable, transparent, and data-driven health insurance systems that effectively align the incentives of all stakeholders. Full article

This study compares the Stackelberg game model and the entropy weight method for allocating intercity water rights in Heilongjiang Province (2014–2021). The entropy method objectively determines indicator weights, while the Stackelberg framework simulates leader–follower interactions between the water authority and users to balance efficiency and satisfaction. Under the same total water rights cap, the Stackelberg scheme achieves a comprehensive benefit of CNY 14,966 billion, 4% higher than the entropy method (CNY 14,436 billion). The results and comprehensive benefits of the two schemes are close to each other in the cities of Qiqihaer, Daqing, Hegang, etc., but the allocation method of the game theory is more in line with the practical needs and can meet the water demand of each region, and the entropy right method is more useful for the cities of Jiamusi, Jixi, and Heihe, while for other cities the water rights allocation appeared to be unreasonable. While the entropy approach is transparent and data-driven, it lacks dynamic feedback and may under- or over-allocate in rapidly changing contexts. The Stackelberg model adapts to varying demands, better aligning allocations with actual needs. We discuss parameter justification, sensitivity, governance assumptions, and potential extensions, including hybrid modeling, climate change integration, stakeholder participation, and real-time monitoring. The findings provide methodological insights for adaptive and equitable water allocation in regions with strong regulatory capacity. Full article

As global energy systems transition towards greater reliance on renewable energy sources, the integration of energy storage systems (ESSs) becomes increasingly critical to managing the intermittency and variability associated with renewable generation. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the application of evolutionary game theory (EGT) to optimize ESSs, emphasizing its role in enhancing decision-making processes, operation scheduling, and multi-agent coordination within dynamic, decentralized energy environments. A significant contribution of this paper is the incorporation of negotiation mechanisms and collaborative decision-making frameworks, which are essential for effective multi-agent coordination in complex systems. Unlike traditional game-theoretic models, EGT accounts for bounded rationality and strategic adaptation, offering a robust tool for modeling the interactions among stakeholders such as energy producers, consumers, and storage operators. The paper first addresses the key challenges in integrating ESS into modern power grids, particularly with high penetration of intermittent renewable energy. It then introduces the foundational principles of EGT and compares its advantages over classical game theory in capturing the evolving strategies of agents within these complex environments. A key innovation explored in this review is the hybridization of game-theoretic models, combining the stability of classical game theory with the adaptability of EGT, providing a comprehensive approach to resource allocation and coordination. Furthermore, this paper highlights the importance of deliberative democracy and process-based negotiation decision-making mechanisms in optimizing ESS operations, proposing a shift towards more inclusive, transparent, and consensus-driven decision-making. The review also examines several case studies where EGT has been successfully applied to optimize both local and large-scale ESSs, demonstrating its potential to enhance system efficiency, reduce operational costs, and improve reliability. Additionally, hybrid models incorporating evolutionary algorithms and particle swarm optimization have shown superior performance compared to traditional methods. The future directions for EGT in ESS optimization are discussed, emphasizing the integration of artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and blockchain technologies to address current challenges such as data scarcity, computational complexity, and scalability. These interdisciplinary innovations are expected to drive the development of more resilient, efficient, and flexible energy systems capable of supporting a decarbonized energy future. Full article

The complex interdependencies among numerous safety risk factors influencing oil tanker loading/unloading operations constitute a focal point in academic research. To enhance safety management in oil port operations, this study conducts a risk analysis of oil tanker berthing and cargo transfer safety. Initially, safety risk factors are identified based on the Wu-li Shi-li Ren-li (WSR) systems methodology. Subsequently, a hybrid weighting approach integrating the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP), G2 method, and modified CRITIC technique is employed to calculate indicator weights. These weights are then synthesised into a combined weight (GVW) using cooperative game theory and variable weight theory. Further, by integrating grey theory with the cloud model (GCM), a risk assessment is performed using Tianjin Port as a case study. Results indicate that the higher-risk indicators for Tianjin Port include vessel traffic density, safety of berthing/unberthing operations, safety of cargo transfer operations, safety of pipeline transfer operations, psychological resilience, proficiency of pilots and captains, and emergency management capability. The overall comprehensive risk evaluation value for Tianjin Port is 0.403, corresponding to a “Moderate Risk” level. Comparative experiments demonstrate that the results generated by this model align with those obtained through Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Methods. However, the proposed GVW-GCM framework provides a more objective and accurate reflection of safety risks during tanker operations. Based on the computational outcomes, targeted recommendations for risk mitigation are presented. The integrated weighting model—incorporating game theory and variable weight concepts—coupled with the grey cloud methodology, establishes an interpretable and reusable analytical framework for the safety assessment of oil port operations under diverse port conditions. This approach provides critical decision support for constructing comprehensive management systems governing oil tanker loading/unloading operations. Full article

Modern traffic management requires sophisticated approaches to address the complexities of urban road networks, which continue to grow in complexity due to increasing urbanization and vehicle usage. Traditional methods often fall short in mitigating congestion and optimizing traffic flow, inducing the exploration of innovative traffic control strategies based on advanced theoretical frameworks. In this sense, we explore different game theory-based control strategies in an eight-intersection traffic network modeled by means of hybrid systems and graph theory, using a software simulator that combines the multi-modal traffic simulation software VISSIM and MATLAB to integrate traffic network parameters and population game criteria. Across five distinct network scenarios with varying saturation conditions, we explore a fixed-time scheme of signaling by means of fictitious play dynamics and adaptive schemes, using dynamics such as Smith, replicator, Logit and Brown–Von Neumann–Nash (BNN). Results show better performance for Smith and replicator dynamics in terms of traffic parameters both for fixed and variable signaling times, with an interesting outcome of fictitious play over BNN and Logit. Full article

As the integration of renewable energy sources into microgrid operations deepens, their inherent uncertainty poses significant challenges for dispatch scheduling. This paper proposes a hybrid game-theoretic optimization strategy to address the uncertainty of renewable energy in microgrid scheduling. An energy trading framework is developed, involving integrated energy microgrids (IEMS), shared energy storage operators (ESOS), and user aggregators (UAS). A mixed game model combining master–slave and cooperative game theory is constructed in which the ESO acts as the leader by setting electricity prices to maximize its own profit, while guiding the IEMs and UAs—as followers—to optimize their respective operations. Cooperative decisions within the IEM coalition are coordinated using Nash bargaining theory. To enhance the generality of the user aggregator model, both electric vehicle (EV) users and demand response (DR) users are considered. Additionally, the model incorporates renewable energy output uncertainty through distributionally robust chance constraints (DRCCs). The resulting two-level optimization problem is solved using Karush–Kuhn–Tucker (KKT) conditions and the Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM). Simulation results verify the effectiveness and robustness of the proposed model in enhancing operational efficiency under conditions of uncertainty. Full article

This study examines how international mega-events have adapted to post-pandemic conditions, with a focus on sustainability, resilience, and the integration of public health. Employing a qualitative comparative case study design, the analysis spans events such as the Olympic Games, FIFA World Cup, Lollapalooza, and NASCAR’s Chicago Street Race. Drawing on numerous secondary sources, the study explores shifts in infrastructure planning, socio-cultural engagement, marketing strategies, and environmental practices. The findings reveal a pivot toward modular infrastructure, hybrid formats, and community-centered governance. The research contributes to event management theory by highlighting emergent adaptive strategies and offering a framework for more resilient, inclusive, and sustainable mega-event planning. Full article

Implementing hybrid carbon policies is crucial for supply chains’ low-carbon transition. However, the downstream retailer is often passive in low-carbon strategies, leading to fair issues that may influence the decision-making of channel members. Therefore, this study integrates green technology, remanufacturing, retailer’s fairness concerns, low-carbon preference, and hybrid carbon policies into a manufacturer-led supply chain through differential game theory. Then, the equilibrium solutions for each member are analyzed under the centralized case and decentralized case involving a cost-sharing contract for low-carbon promotion. Our results show that centralized decision-making can optimize both the economic and environmental performances of channel members; retailer’s fairness concerns can enhance low-carbon promotional efforts and the cost-sharing ratio for such initiatives, but do not impact low-carbon production efforts. Additionally, a threshold exists on the relationship between retailer’s fairness concerns and the cost-sharing ratio; increased low-carbon preference motivates more efforts in low-carbon production and promotion. Moreover, stricter carbon policies motivate the manufacturer to increase low-carbon efforts, but the retailer tailors its low-carbon promotional strategy according to the unit carbon emissions of products to maintain an adequate level of low-carbon goodwill. Full article

The power system, which is also one of the most crucial parts of fuel cell cars, marks the biggest distinction between them and conventional automobiles. Fuel cell hybrid power systems are reviewed in this paper along with their current state of research. Three different kinds of fuel cell hybrid power systems—fuel cell–battery, fuel cell–supercapacitor, and fuel cell–battery–supercapacitor—are thoroughly compared and analyzed, and they are systematically explained in the three areas of passenger cars, buses, and heavy duty trucks. Existing fuel cell hybrid systems and energy strategies are systematically reviewed and summarized, including predictive control strategies based on game theory, power allocation strategies, fuzzy control strategies, and adaptive super twisted sliding mode control (ASTSMC) energy management techniques. This study offers recommendations and direction for the future direction of fuel cell hybrid power system research and development. Full article